1
|
Ding L, Yu X, Zhang R, Qian J, Zhang W, Wu Q, Zhou L, Yang Z, Zheng S. Full-Right Full-Left Split Liver Transplantation for Two Adult Recipients: A Single-Center Experience in China. J Clin Med 2023; 12:3782. [PMID: 37297977 PMCID: PMC10253538 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12113782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Revised: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The most effective treatment for end-stage liver diseases is liver transplantation, which is impeded by the shortage of donor livers. Split liver transplantation (SLT) is important for addressing the donor liver shortage. However, full-right full-left SLT for two adult recipients is globally rarely conducted. This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of this technique. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 22 recipients who underwent full-right full-left SLT at Shulan (Hangzhou) Hospital between January, 2021 and September, 2022. The graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR), cold ischemia time, operation time, length of the anhepatic phase, intraoperative blood loss, and red blood cell transfusion amount were all analyzed. The differences in liver function recovery after transplantation were compared between the left and right hemiliver groups. The postoperative complications and prognosis of the recipients were also analyzed. RESULTS The livers of 11 donors were transplanted into 22 adult recipients. The GRWR ranged from 1.16-1.65%, the cold ischemia time was 282.86 ± 134.87 min, the operation time was 371.32 ± 75.36 min, the anhepatic phase lasted 60.73 ± 19.00 min, the intraoperative blood loss was 759.09 ± 316.84 mL, and the red blood cell transfusion amount was 695.45 ± 393.67 mL. No significant difference in the levels of liver function markers, total bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, or alanine aminotransferase between left and right hemiliver groups at 1, 3, 5, 7, 14, and 28 d postoperatively was observed (both p > 0.05). One recipient developed bile leakage 10 d after transplantation, which improved with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-guided nasobiliary drainage and stent placement. Another developed portal vein thrombosis 12 d after transplantation and underwent portal vein thrombectomy and stenting to restore portal vein blood flow. A color Doppler ultrasound performed 2 d after transplantation revealed hepatic artery thrombosis in one patient, and thrombolytic therapy was administered to restore hepatic artery blood flow. The liver function of other patients recovered quickly after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS Full-right full-left SLT for two adult patients is an efficient way to increase the donor pool. It is safe and feasible with careful donor and recipient selection. Transplant hospitals with highly experienced surgeons in SLT are recommended to promote using full-right full-left SLT for two adult recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Limin Ding
- Division of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China; (L.D.); (X.Y.); (J.Q.); (Q.W.)
- NHFPC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Hangzhou 310003, China;
- Key Laboratory of the Diagnosis and Treatment of Organ Transplantation, CAMS, Hangzhou 310003, China
- Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Xizhi Yu
- Division of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China; (L.D.); (X.Y.); (J.Q.); (Q.W.)
- NHFPC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Hangzhou 310003, China;
- Key Laboratory of the Diagnosis and Treatment of Organ Transplantation, CAMS, Hangzhou 310003, China
- Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Rui Zhang
- Fuzhou Medical College, Nanchang University, Fuzhou 344000, China;
| | - Junjie Qian
- Division of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China; (L.D.); (X.Y.); (J.Q.); (Q.W.)
- NHFPC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Hangzhou 310003, China;
- Key Laboratory of the Diagnosis and Treatment of Organ Transplantation, CAMS, Hangzhou 310003, China
- Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Wu Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Shulan (Hangzhou) Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, China;
| | - Qinchuan Wu
- Division of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China; (L.D.); (X.Y.); (J.Q.); (Q.W.)
- NHFPC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Hangzhou 310003, China;
- Key Laboratory of the Diagnosis and Treatment of Organ Transplantation, CAMS, Hangzhou 310003, China
- Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Lin Zhou
- NHFPC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Hangzhou 310003, China;
- Key Laboratory of the Diagnosis and Treatment of Organ Transplantation, CAMS, Hangzhou 310003, China
- Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Hangzhou 310003, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis Treatment of Infectious Diseases, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Zhe Yang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Shulan (Hangzhou) Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, China;
| | - Shusen Zheng
- Division of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China; (L.D.); (X.Y.); (J.Q.); (Q.W.)
- NHFPC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Hangzhou 310003, China;
- Key Laboratory of the Diagnosis and Treatment of Organ Transplantation, CAMS, Hangzhou 310003, China
- Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Hangzhou 310003, China
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Shulan (Hangzhou) Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, China;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lozanovski VJ, Adigozalov S, Khajeh E, Ghamarnejad O, Aminizadeh E, Schleicher C, Hackert T, Müller-Stich BP, Merle U, Picardi S, Lund F, Chang DH, Mieth M, Fonouni H, Golriz M, Mehrabi A. Declined Organs for Liver Transplantation: A Right Decision or a Missed Opportunity for Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma? Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:1365. [PMID: 36900157 PMCID: PMC10000136 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15051365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Revised: 02/11/2023] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver transplantation is the only promising treatment for end-stage liver disease and patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. However, too many organs are rejected for transplantation. METHODS We analyzed the factors involved in organ allocation in our transplant center and reviewed all livers that were declined for transplantation. Reasons for declining organs for transplantation were categorized as major extended donor criteria (maEDC), size mismatch and vascular problems, medical reasons and risk of disease transmission, and other reasons. The fate of the declined organs was analyzed. RESULTS 1086 declined organs were offered 1200 times. A total of 31% of the livers were declined because of maEDC, 35.5% because of size mismatch and vascular problems, 15.8% because of medical reasons and risk of disease transmission, and 20.7% because of other reasons. A total of 40% of the declined organs were allocated and transplanted. A total of 50% of the organs were completely discarded, and significantly more of these grafts had maEDC than grafts that were eventually allocated (37.5% vs. 17.7%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Most organs were declined because of poor organ quality. Donor-recipient matching at time of allocation and organ preservation must be improved by allocating maEDC grafts using individualized algorithms that avoid high-risk donor-recipient combinations and unnecessary organ declination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vladimir J. Lozanovski
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Said Adigozalov
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elias Khajeh
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Omid Ghamarnejad
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ehsan Aminizadeh
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christina Schleicher
- German Organ Procurement Organization (Deutsche Stiftung Organtransplantation, DSO), 60594 Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Beat Peter Müller-Stich
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Uta Merle
- Department of Internal Medicine IV, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Susanne Picardi
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Frederike Lund
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - De-Hua Chang
- Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus Mieth
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hamidreza Fonouni
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mohammad Golriz
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arianeb Mehrabi
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Xu M, Dong C, Sun C, Wang K, Zhang W, Qin H, Han C, Yang Y, Zhang F, Wang Z, Zheng W, Wei X, Gao W, Shen Z. Impact of donor age on short-term outcomes after pediatric split liver transplantation. Front Pediatr 2023; 11:1131629. [PMID: 37114006 PMCID: PMC10126406 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2023.1131629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Donor shortage is an important limitation of liver transplantation (LT). Split liver transplantation (SLT) may increase the sources of donors and reduce the problem of organ shortage. However, there are no standard criteria of the selection of SLT donor, especially regarding the donor age. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of children who received initial SLT between January 2015 and December 2021. Based on the age of donors, the patients were divided into groups A (1-10 years old; n = 26), B (10-45 years old; n = 87), and C (45-55 years old; n = 27). The short-term (<1 year after SLT) outcomes of the recipients were analyzed. Results A total of 140 patients received SLT from 122 donors. The 1-, 3- and 12-month patient survival rates in group A were 100.0%, and the graft survival rates were 92.3%. The 1-, 3- and 12-month survival rates of patient and graft in group B were 97.7%, 96.6%, and 95.0%, respectively, and in group C were 85.2%, 85.2%, and 81.1%, respectively. The patient survival rate was significantly lower in group C than in groups A and B (p = 0.0082). There was no significant difference in graft survival between the three groups (p = 0.0545). Conclusions Similar results were obtained for pediatric SLT with donors <10 years old and 10-45 years old. Pediatric SLT can be performed with older donors (45-55 years) after strict donor selection and selection of appropriate recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Xu
- Department of Pediatric Transplantation, Organ Transplantation Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Chong Dong
- Department of Pediatric Transplantation, Organ Transplantation Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Chao Sun
- Department of Pediatric Transplantation, Organ Transplantation Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Kai Wang
- Department of Pediatric Transplantation, Organ Transplantation Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Wei Zhang
- Department of Pediatric Transplantation, Organ Transplantation Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Hong Qin
- Department of Pediatric Transplantation, Organ Transplantation Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Chao Han
- Department of Pediatric Transplantation, Organ Transplantation Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Yang Yang
- Department of Pediatric Transplantation, Organ Transplantation Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Fubo Zhang
- Department of Pediatric Transplantation, Organ Transplantation Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Zhen Wang
- Department of Pediatric Transplantation, Organ Transplantation Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Weiping Zheng
- Department of Pediatric Transplantation, Organ Transplantation Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Xinzhe Wei
- Department of Pediatric Transplantation, Organ Transplantation Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Wei Gao
- Department of Pediatric Transplantation, Organ Transplantation Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
- Correspondence: Wei Gao
| | - Zhongyang Shen
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
- Organ Transplantation Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vargas PA, Dalzell C, Robinson T, Cunningham M, Henry Z, Stotts MJ, Su F, Argo C, Pelletier S, Oberholzer J, Goldaracena N. Split liver transplantation with extended right grafts on adult recipients: A propensity score matching analysis. Clin Transplant 2022; 36:e14801. [PMID: 35997030 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Revised: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Split liver transplantation (SLT) emerged due to its potential to contribute to the organ pool and reduce organ shortage. However, SLT is technically challenging and has been associated with higher rates of postoperative complications leading to concerns about graft and patient survival. Moreover, there are few studies on matched-pair adult recipients of SLT and whole-liver transplant (WLT), with conflicting results. METHODS This retrospective study analyze outcomes among adults who underwent SLT at our institution from 2010 to 2019. A 1:1 propensity score matching analysis was performed based on important donor and recipient variables. Baseline characteristics and postoperative outcomes were analyzed and compared between groups. Actuarial graft and patient survival were analyzed by KM curves. RESULTS Out of 592 adults receiving a LT in our institution, 21 SLT adult recipients were identified and matched with 21 adults undergoing WLT. As expected donor age was significantly lower in SLT recipients (16 (15-22) vs. 32 (17-47), P = .012). Additional donor characteristics, including anthropometrics, and ischemic times were similar between groups. Baseline recipient characteristics and postoperative outcomes, including length of stay, vascular complications, biliary complications, and re-transplantation were comparable between SLT and WLT recipients. Graft (95/95/95 vs. 100/94/94, P = .98) and patient (100/100/100 vs. 100/94/94, P = .30) survival at 1-, 3-, 5-years, were similar between the SLT- and WLT group, respectively. CONCLUSION Split liver transplantation has the potential to increase the availability of organs for adult recipients without compromising individual outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paola A Vargas
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Christina Dalzell
- School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Todd Robinson
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Michaela Cunningham
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Zachary Henry
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Matthew J Stotts
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Feng Su
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Curtis Argo
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Shawn Pelletier
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Jose Oberholzer
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Nicolas Goldaracena
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rossignol G, Muller X, Mohkam K, Dubois R, Lesurtel M, Mabrut JY. Full left/full right liver graft ex situ split during hypothermic oxygenated perfusion. Pediatr Transplant 2022; 26:e14284. [PMID: 35437884 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Revised: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ex vivo split liver transplantation in pediatric recipients has shown inferior results compared with whole grafts. One factor among others contributing to split grafts being considered as marginal is the prolonged static cold storage time related to ex vivo liver splitting. End ischemic hypothermic oxygenated perfusion is a validated strategy to improve outcomes of marginal whole grafts and may thus also benefit split liver grafts. METHOD We present the first case of full left/full right split procedure performed during hypothermic oxygenated perfusion. RESULTS We present a standardized surgical two-step approach where parenchymal transection was performed during end ischemic hypothermic oxygenated perfusion via the portal vein to shorten static cold storage duration. Both split grafts were successfully transplanted in a 4-year-old pediatric and a 38-year-old adult recipient. Despite high-risk procedure (retransplantation), extended donor criteria including a prolonged cardiac arrest and high donor risk index (2,25), both grafts showed early recovery of hepatic function and low serum transaminase release. At 6 months, both recipients were alive with a normal liver biology and a functioning graft. CONCLUSION Although challenging, full left/full right liver split procedure during end ischemic hypothermic oxygenated perfusion can be successfully performed and is a promising strategy to improve post-transplant outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillaume Rossignol
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Femme Mere Enfant University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, France.,Department of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Croix-Rousse University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, France.,The Lyon Cancer Research Centre, INSERM U1052, UMR 5286, Lyon, France
| | - Xavier Muller
- Department of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Croix-Rousse University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, France.,The Lyon Cancer Research Centre, INSERM U1052, UMR 5286, Lyon, France
| | - Kayvan Mohkam
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Femme Mere Enfant University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, France.,Department of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Croix-Rousse University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, France.,The Lyon Cancer Research Centre, INSERM U1052, UMR 5286, Lyon, France
| | - Remi Dubois
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Femme Mere Enfant University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, France
| | - Mickaël Lesurtel
- Department of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Croix-Rousse University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, France.,The Lyon Cancer Research Centre, INSERM U1052, UMR 5286, Lyon, France
| | - Jean-Yves Mabrut
- Department of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Croix-Rousse University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, France.,The Lyon Cancer Research Centre, INSERM U1052, UMR 5286, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Herden U, Nadalin S, Scherer MN, Mehrabi A, Braun F, Paul A, Gül-Klein S, Pratschke J, Fischer L. Multicenter Matched-pair Analysis of Extended Right Lobe Versus Whole Organ Liver Transplantation: A Snap Shot of the Tragic Situation in Germany. Transplantation 2022; 106:1510-2. [PMID: 35881518 DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
7
|
Lozanovski VJ, Unterrainer C, Döhler B, Süsal C, Mehrabi A. Outcome of Extended Right Lobe Liver Transplantations. Liver Transpl 2022; 28:807-818. [PMID: 34806843 DOI: 10.1002/lt.26374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Revised: 10/23/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Split-liver transplantation offers a solution to the organ shortage problem. However, the outcomes of extended right lobe liver transplantation (ERLT) and whether it is a suitable alternative to full-size liver transplantation (FSLT) remain controversial. We compared the outcomes of ERLT and FSLT in adult recipients of 43,409 first deceased donor liver transplantations using Cox regression. We also analyzed 612 ERLT and 1224 FSLT 1:2 matched cases to identify factors that affect ERLT outcome. The risk of graft loss was significantly higher following ERLT than following FSLT during the first posttransplantation year in the matched and unmatched collective (hazard ratio [HR], 1.39 and 1.27 and P = 0.01 and 0.006, respectively). Every additional hour of cold ischemia time (CIT) increased the risk of 1-year graft loss by 10% in the ERLT group compared with only 3% in the FSLT group (P = 0.003 and <0.001, respectively). Importantly, the outcome of ERLT and FSLT did not differ significantly if the CIT was below 10 hours (HR, 0.71; P = 0.22). One-year graft and patient survival were lower in high-risk ERLT recipients with a Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score of ≥20 (HR, 1.88; P = 0.03 and HR, 2.03; P = 0.02). In the male recipient-male donor combination, ERLT recipients had a higher risk of 1-year graft loss than FSLT recipients (HR, 2.44; P = 0.006). This was probably because of the significantly higher MELD score in ERLT recipients (P = 0.004). ERLT in adults is an adequate alternative to FSLT and offers an elegant solution to the problem of organ shortage as long as the cold storage is less than 10 hours and the recipient's MELD score is <20.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vladimir J Lozanovski
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Bernd Döhler
- Institute of Immunology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Caner Süsal
- Institute of Immunology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Transplant Immunology Research Center of Excellence, Koç University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Arianeb Mehrabi
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ngee-Soon L, Mark L, Ken L, Avik M, SimoneI S, Raaj K B, Geoffrey W M, Michael C, Carlo P. Is it safe to expand the indications for split liver transplantation in adults? A single-centre analysis of 155 in-situ splits. Clin Transplant 2022; 36:e14673. [PMID: 35441379 PMCID: PMC9541812 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Revised: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Split liver transplantation (SLT) enables two recipients to be transplanted using a single donor liver; typically, an adult and a child. Despite equivalent long-term outcomes to whole grafts in selected adults, the use of these grafts in high-risk adult recipients with high model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores (≥30), a poor pre-transplant clinical status (ICU or hospital-bound), acute liver failure or retransplantation remains controversial. METHODS We retrospectively analysed all deceased donor adult liver transplants performed between July 2002 and November 2019 at a single high-volume centre and performed a propensity score-matched analysis. A subgroup analysis was performed to assess utility of these grafts for high-risk recipients. RESULTS A total of 1090 adult liver transplants were performed, including 155 SLT (14%). Graft survival at 1-, 3- and 5-years were comparable between recipients of split and whole liver grafts (82%, 79% and 74% vs 86%, 81% and 77% respectively, log rank p = 0.537), as was patient survival at 1-, 3- and 5-years. Recipients of split grafts were more likely to have biliary complications and hepatic artery thrombosis, but equivalent long-term survival. Recipients with high MELD scores or a poor pre-transplant clinical status had similar patient and graft survival and complication profiles irrespective of whether they received split or whole grafts. CONCLUSIONS SLT is an important method for addressing donor shortages and provides comparable long-term outcomes in adult recipients despite an increase in short-term complications. SLT use in high-risk recipients should be considered to allow for sickest-first allocation policies. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lau Ngee-Soon
- Australian National Liver Transplantation Unit, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, 2050, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, 2006, Australia
| | - Ly Mark
- Australian National Liver Transplantation Unit, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, 2050, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, 2006, Australia
| | - Liu Ken
- Australian National Liver Transplantation Unit, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, 2050, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, 2006, Australia
| | - Majumdar Avik
- Australian National Liver Transplantation Unit, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, 2050, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, 2006, Australia
| | - Strasser SimoneI
- Australian National Liver Transplantation Unit, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, 2050, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, 2006, Australia
| | - Biswas Raaj K
- Sydney Local Health District Clinical Research Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, 2050, Australia
| | - McCaughan Geoffrey W
- Australian National Liver Transplantation Unit, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, 2050, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, 2006, Australia
| | - Crawford Michael
- Australian National Liver Transplantation Unit, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, 2050, Australia
| | - Pulitano Carlo
- Australian National Liver Transplantation Unit, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, 2050, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, 2006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lozanovski VJ, Ramouz A, Aminizadeh E, Al-Saegh SAH, Khajeh E, Probst H, Picardi S, Rupp C, Chang DH, Probst P, Mehrabi A. Prognostic role of selection criteria for liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a network meta-analysis. BJS Open 2022; 6:6536147. [PMID: 35211739 PMCID: PMC8874238 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2021] [Revised: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 11/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are selected for transplantation if they have a low tumour burden and low risk of recurrence. The morphometric Milan criteria have been the cornerstone for patient selection, but dynamic morphological and biological tumour characteristics surfaced as an encouraging tool to refine the selection of patients with HCC and to support the expansion of the Milan criteria. The outcomes of the most prevalent models that select patients with HCC for liver transplantation were analysed in this study, which aimed to identify the selection model that offered the best recurrence-free and overall survival after transplantation. METHODS Studies that compared Milan, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), up-to-seven (UPTS), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and MetroTicket 2.0 (MT2) models were included. One-year, 3-year, and 5-year recurrence-free and overall survival rates of patients selected for transplantation using different models were analysed. RESULTS A total of 60 850 adult patients with HCC selected for liver transplantation using Milan, UCSF, UPTS, AFP, or MT2 criteria were included. Patients selected for transplantation using the MT2 model had the highest 1-, 3-, and 5-year recurrence-free survival. In addition, patients selected for transplantation using MT2 criteria had the best 1- and 3-year overall survival, whereas patients selected for transplantation using the Milan criteria had the best 5-year overall survival rates. CONCLUSION The MT2 model offered the best post-transplant outcomes in patients with HCC, highlighting the importance of considering tumour morphology and biology when selecting patients with HCC for liver transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vladimir J Lozanovski
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ali Ramouz
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ehsan Aminizadeh
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sadeq Ali-Hasan Al-Saegh
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elias Khajeh
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Heike Probst
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Susanne Picardi
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Rupp
- Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine IV, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - De-Hua Chang
- Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Pascal Probst
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arianeb Mehrabi
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lau NS, Liu K, McCaughan G, Crawford M, Pulitano C. Are split liver grafts a suitable option in high-risk liver transplant recipients? Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2021; 26:675-680. [PMID: 34653087 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000000938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To assess the outcomes of split liver transplantation (SLT) in adults and children and evaluate its role in high-risk recipients with a high model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, an urgent indication or requiring retransplantation. RECENT FINDINGS Split liver grafts in general have equivalent long-term survival outcomes to whole grafts despite an increase in biliary complications. Recent success and technical advances have encouraged use of these grafts in high-risk recipients. Split liver grafts can be used successfully in recipients with a high MELD score if there is adequate weight-matching. There are mixed results in urgent indication recipients and for retransplantation such that use in this group of patients remains controversial. SUMMARY SLT addresses donor shortages by facilitating the transplant of two recipients from the same donor liver. By using careful donor and recipient selection criteria, SLT can achieve equivalent long-term outcomes to whole grafts. These grafts have been used successfully in recipients with a high MELD score, but should be used selectively in urgent indication recipients and for retransplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ngee-Soon Lau
- Australian National Liver Transplantation Unit, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ken Liu
- Australian National Liver Transplantation Unit, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Geoffrey McCaughan
- Australian National Liver Transplantation Unit, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael Crawford
- Australian National Liver Transplantation Unit, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
| | - Carlo Pulitano
- Australian National Liver Transplantation Unit, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lozanovski VJ, Probst P, Arefidoust A, Ramouz A, Aminizadeh E, Nikdad M, Khajeh E, Ghamarnejad O, Shafiei S, Ali-Hasan-Al-Saegh S, Seide SE, Kalkum E, Nickkholgh A, Czigany Z, Lurje G, Mieth M, Mehrabi A. Prognostic role of the Donor Risk Index, the Eurotransplant Donor Risk Index, and the Balance of Risk score on graft loss after liver transplantation. Transpl Int 2021; 34:778-800. [PMID: 33728724 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Revised: 02/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
This study aimed to identify cutoff values for donor risk index (DRI), Eurotransplant (ET)-DRI, and balance of risk (BAR) scores that predict the risk of liver graft loss. MEDLINE and Web of Science databases were searched systematically and unrestrictedly. Graft loss odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were assessed by meta-analyses using Mantel-Haenszel tests with a random-effects model. Cutoff values for predicting graft loss at 3 months, 1 year, and 3 years were analyzed for each of the scores. Measures of calibration and discrimination used in studies validating the DRI and the ET-DRI were summarized. DRI ≥ 1.4 (six studies, n = 35 580 patients) and ET-DRI ≥ 1.4 (four studies, n = 11 666 patients) were associated with the highest risk of graft loss at all time points. BAR > 18 was associated with the highest risk of 3-month and 1-year graft loss (n = 6499 patients). A DRI cutoff of 1.8 and an ET-DRI cutoff of 1.7 were estimated using a summary receiver operator characteristic curve, but the sensitivity and specificity of these cutoff values were low. A DRI and ET-DRI score ≥ 1.4 and a BAR score > 18 have a negative influence on graft survival, but these cutoff values are not well suited for predicting graft loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vladimir J Lozanovski
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Pascal Probst
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alireza Arefidoust
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ali Ramouz
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ehsan Aminizadeh
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mohammadsadegh Nikdad
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elias Khajeh
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Omid Ghamarnejad
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Saeed Shafiei
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sadeq Ali-Hasan-Al-Saegh
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Svenja E Seide
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics (IMBI), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Kalkum
- The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arash Nickkholgh
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Zoltan Czigany
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Georg Lurje
- Department of Surgery, Charité -Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Markus Mieth
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arianeb Mehrabi
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|