1
|
Pawłowski P, Ziętara KJ, Michalczyk J, Fryze M, Buchacz A, Zaucha-Prażmo A, Zawitkowska J, Torres A, Samardakiewicz M. Fertility Preservation in Children and Adolescents during Oncological Treatment-A Review of Healthcare System Factors and Attitudes of Patients and Their Caregivers. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4393. [PMID: 37686669 PMCID: PMC10487203 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15174393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Revised: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Oncofertility is any therapeutic intervention to safeguard the fertility of cancer patients. Anti-cancer therapies (chemotherapy, radiation therapy, etc.) entail the risk of reproductive disorders through cytotoxic effects on gamete-building cells, especially those not yet fully developed. This literature review analyzes the available data on securing fertility in pediatric and adolescent populations to identify the methods used and describe aspects related to financing, ethics, and the perspective of patients and their parents. Topics related to oncofertility in this age group are relatively niche, with few peer-reviewed articles available and published studies mostly on adults. Compared to pubertal individuals, a limited number of fertility preservation methods are used for prepubertal patients. Funding for the procedures described varies from country to country, but only a few governments choose to reimburse them. Oncofertility of pediatric and adolescent patients raises many controversies related to the decision, parents' beliefs, having a partner, ethics, as well as the knowledge and experience of healthcare professionals. As the fertility of young cancer patients is at risk, healthcare professionals should make every effort to provide them with an opportunity to fulfill their future reproductive plans and to have a family and offspring. Systemic solutions should form the basis for the development of oncofertility in pediatric and adolescent populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piotr Pawłowski
- Student Scientific Association at the Department of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland; (P.P.); (J.M.)
| | - Karolina Joanna Ziętara
- Student Scientific Association at the Department of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland; (P.P.); (J.M.)
| | - Justyna Michalczyk
- Student Scientific Association at the Department of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland; (P.P.); (J.M.)
| | - Magdalena Fryze
- Department of Psychology, Psychosocial Aspects of Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland; (M.F.); (M.S.)
| | - Anna Buchacz
- Youth Cancer Europe, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
| | - Agnieszka Zaucha-Prażmo
- Department of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Transplantology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland; (A.Z.-P.); (J.Z.)
| | - Joanna Zawitkowska
- Department of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Transplantology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland; (A.Z.-P.); (J.Z.)
| | - Anna Torres
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland;
| | - Marzena Samardakiewicz
- Department of Psychology, Psychosocial Aspects of Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland; (M.F.); (M.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sauerbrun-Cutler MT, Pandya S, Recabo O, Raker C, Clark MA, Robison K. Survey of young women with breast cancer to identify rates of fertility preservation (FP) discussion and barriers to FP care. J Assist Reprod Genet 2023:10.1007/s10815-023-02850-8. [PMID: 37329421 PMCID: PMC10371949 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-023-02850-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To identify the proportion of reproductive age women with breast cancer that engaged in a fertility preservation discussion and reproductive endocrinology and infertility (REI) consultation. METHODS This cross-sectional survey recruited women 18-42 years who were diagnosed with breast cancer from 2006 to 2016 by phone or email and asked them to complete an online survey. Demographic characteristics, barriers to FP, utilization of FP consultation, and FP procedures (oocyte and embryo cryopreservation) were analyzed. RESULTS A majority of women (64%) did not have FP discussed by any provider. Older women and those who were parents at the time of diagnosis were less likely to engage in a FP discussion. However, there were no significant differences in partner status or cancer stage between women with or without FP discussions. Of the women who desired future children prior to the cancer diagnosis, 93% received chemotherapy; however, only 34% of these women had a consultation with an REI. The most common reasons for declining FP consultation were already having their desired number of children (41%), financial barriers (14%), and concern about delaying cancer treatment and cancer recurrence (12%). Forty percent of women who desired future children and met with an REI pursued FP procedures. CONCLUSION Younger women were more likely to receive FP counseling. FP consultations and procedures were low even in women who desired future fertility, with the predominant barriers being cost, fears concerning a delay in cancer treatment, and future cancer recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- May-Tal Sauerbrun-Cutler
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Women & Infants Hospital, 90 Plain Street, Providence, RI, 02905, USA.
| | | | - Olivia Recabo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA
| | - Christina Raker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Women & Infants Hospital, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Melissa A Clark
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Women & Infants Hospital, Providence, RI, USA
- Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Katina Robison
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Martinet-Kosinski F, Lamy S, Bauvin E, Dalenc F, Vaysse C, Grosclaude P. Access to information and oncofertility consultation for young women with breast cancer: a population-based study. Sci Rep 2023; 13:3313. [PMID: 36849808 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-30423-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Non-menopausal women with breast cancer treated with chemotherapy are at intermediate risk of post-treatment amenorrhea and decreased fertility. Although they should receive appropriate information, studies until now show that this is inadequate. We investigated the proportion of women who received information about this risk during the pre-treatment consultation, and those who received an oncofertility consultation to preserve their gametes. We also analysed the medical and non-medical factors influencing the transmission of information to patients and their uptake of oncofertility consultations. We included women aged 18-40 years treated with chemotherapy for breast cancer between 2012 and 2017 in the Midi-Pyrénées region (ca. 3 million inhabitants), France. Studied variables were included in a multilevel model. Among the 575 women, 41% of the women received information and 28% received an oncofertility consultation. These two steps on the care pathway were significantly influenced by the type of care structure, the woman's age, her parity at the time of diagnosis, and the metastatic status of the cancer. Female oncologist gender was significantly associated with higher transmission rate. We found no association between neoadjuvant chemotherapy status, level of deprivation (EDI), triple-negative status, marital status, and first-degree family history of cancer and information transmission or uptake of oncofertility consultation. Our study shows that not enough women are informed and have recourse to an oncofertility consultation. Despite a legal obligation, the health care system does not offer the necessary conditions for access to oncofertility care.
Collapse
|
4
|
Rives N, Courbière B, Almont T, Kassab D, Berger C, Grynberg M, Papaxanthos A, Decanter C, Elefant E, Dhedin N, Barraud-Lange V, Béranger MC, Demoor-Goldschmidt C, Frédérique N, Bergère M, Gabrel L, Duperray M, Vermel C, Hoog-Labouret N, Pibarot M, Provansal M, Quéro L, Lejeune H, Methorst C, Saias J, Véronique-Baudin J, Giscard d'Estaing S, Farsi F, Poirot C, Huyghe É. What should be done in terms of fertility preservation for patients with cancer? The French 2021 guidelines. Eur J Cancer 2022; 173:146-166. [PMID: 35932626 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2022] [Revised: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
AIM To provide practice guidelines about fertility preservation (FP) in oncology. METHODS We selected 400 articles after a PubMed review of the literature (1987-2019). RECOMMENDATIONS Any child, adolescent and adult of reproductive age should be informed about the risk of treatment gonadotoxicity. In women, systematically proposed FP counselling between 15 and 38 years of age in case of treatment including bifunctional alkylating agents, above 6 g/m2 cyclophosphamide equivalent dose (CED), and for radiation doses on the ovaries ≥3 Gy. For postmenarchal patients, oocyte cryopreservation after ovarian stimulation is the first-line FP technique. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation should be discussed as a first-line approach in case of treatment with a high gonadotoxic risk, when chemotherapy has already started and in urgent cases. Ovarian transposition is to be discussed prior to pelvic radiotherapy involving a high risk of premature ovarian failure. For prepubertal girls, ovarian tissue cryopreservation should be proposed in the case of treatment with a high gonadotoxic risk. In pubertal males, sperm cryopreservation must be systematically offered to any male who is to undergo cancer treatment, regardless of toxicity. Testicular tissue cryopreservation must be proposed in males unable to cryopreserve sperm who are to undergo a treatment with intermediate or severe risk of gonadotoxicity. In prepubertal boys, testicular tissue preservation is: - recommended for chemotherapy with a CED ≥7500 mg/m2 or radiotherapy ≥3 Gy on both testicles. - proposed for chemotherapy with a CED ≥5.000 mg/m2 or radiotherapy ≥2 Gy. If several possible strategies, the ultimate choice is made by the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathalie Rives
- Normandie Univ, UNIROUEN, Team "Adrenal and Gonadal Physiopathology" Inserm U1239 Nordic, Rouen University Hospital, Biology of Reproduction-CECOS Laboratory, Rouen, France
| | - Blandine Courbière
- Reproductive Medicine and Biology Department, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, France
| | - Thierry Almont
- Cancerology, Urology, Hematology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Martinique, Fort-de-France, Martinique, France; General Cancer Registry of Martinique UF1441, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Martinique, Fort-de-France, Martinique, France
| | - Diana Kassab
- Methodology Unit, Association Française d'Urologie, Paris, Ile-de-France, France
| | - Claire Berger
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University-Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Hospital, Nord Saint-Etienne cedex 02, France 42055; Childhood Cancer Registry of the Rhône-Alpes Region, University of Saint-Etienne, 15 rue Ambroise Paré, Saint-Etienne cedex 02, France 42023
| | - Michaël Grynberg
- Reproductive Medicine and Fertility Department, Hôpital Antoine-Beclère, Clamart, Île-de-France, France
| | - Aline Papaxanthos
- Reproductive Medicine and Biology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, Aquitaine, France
| | - Christine Decanter
- Medically Assisted Procreation and Fertility Preservation Department, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille, Lille, Hauts-de-France, France
| | - Elisabeth Elefant
- Reference Center for Teratogenic Agents, Hôpital Armand-Trousseau Centre de Référence sur les Agents Tératogènes, Paris, Île-de-France, France
| | - Nathalie Dhedin
- Adolescents and Young Adults Unit, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, France
| | - Virginie Barraud-Lange
- Reproductive Medicine and Biology Department, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, Île-de-France, France
| | | | | | - Nicollet Frédérique
- Information and Promotion Department, Association Laurette Fugain, Paris, France
| | - Marianne Bergère
- Human Reproduction, Embryology and Genetics Directorate, Agence de la biomédecine, La Plaine Saint-Denis, France
| | - Lydie Gabrel
- Good Practices Unit - Guidelines and Medicines Directorate, Institut National du Cancer, Billancourt, Île-de-France, France
| | - Marianne Duperray
- Guidelines and Drug Directorate, Institut National du Cancer, Billancourt, Île-de-France, France
| | - Christine Vermel
- Expertise Quality and Compliance Mission - Communication and Information Directorate, Institut National du Cancer, Billancourt, Île-de-France, France
| | - Natalie Hoog-Labouret
- Research and Innovation, Institut National du Cancer, Billancourt, Île-de-France, France
| | - Michèle Pibarot
- OncoPaca-Corse Regional Cancer Network, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, France
| | - Magali Provansal
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, France
| | - Laurent Quéro
- Cancerology and Radiotherapy Department, Hôpital Saint Louis, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Hervé Lejeune
- Reproductive Medicine and Biology Department, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France
| | - Charlotte Methorst
- Reproductive Medicine and Biology Department, Centre Hospitalier des Quatre Villes - Site de Saint-Cloud, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Jacqueline Saias
- Reproductive Medicine and Biology Department, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, France
| | - Jacqueline Véronique-Baudin
- Cancerology, Urology, Hematology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Martinique, Fort-de-France, Martinique, France; General Cancer Registry of Martinique UF1441, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Martinique, Fort-de-France, Martinique, France
| | - Sandrine Giscard d'Estaing
- Reproductive Medicine and Biology Department, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France
| | - Fadila Farsi
- Regional Cancer Network, Réseau Espace Santé Cancer, Lyon, Rhône-Alpes, France
| | - Catherine Poirot
- Adolescents and Young Adults Unit, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, France
| | - Éric Huyghe
- Urology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Laboratoire Développement Embryonnaire, Fertilité et Environnement (DEFE) UMR 1203, Université Toulouse 3 Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jones GL, Moss RH, Darby F, Mahmoodi N, Phillips B, Hughes J, Vogt KS, Greenfield DM, Brauten-Smith G, Gath J, Campbell T, Stark D, Velikova G, Snowden JA, Baskind E, Mascerenhas M, Yeomanson D, Skull J, Lane S, Bekker HL, Anderson RA. Cancer, Fertility and Me: Developing and Testing a Novel Fertility Preservation Patient Decision Aid to Support Women at Risk of Losing Their Fertility Because of Cancer Treatment. Front Oncol 2022; 12:896939. [PMID: 35847858 PMCID: PMC9280471 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.896939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Women with a new cancer diagnosis face complex decisions about interventions aiming to preserve their fertility. Decision aids are more effective in supporting decision making than traditional information provision. We describe the development and field testing of a novel patient decision aid designed to support women to make fertility preservation treatment decisions around cancer diagnosis. Methods A prospective, mixed-method, three stage study involving: 1) co-development of the resource in collaboration with a multi-disciplinary group of key stakeholders including oncology and fertility healthcare professionals and patient partners (n=24), 2) alpha testing with a group of cancer patients who had faced a fertility preservation treatment decision in the past (n=11), and oncology and fertility healthcare professionals and stakeholders (n=14) and, 3) beta testing with women in routine care who had received a recent diagnosis of cancer and were facing a fertility preservation treatment decision (n=41) and their oncology and fertility healthcare professionals (n=3). Ten service users recruited from a closed Breast Cancer Now Facebook group and the support group Cancer and Fertility UK also provided feedback on CFM via an online survey. Results A 60-page paper prototype of the Cancer, Fertility and Me patient decision aid was initially developed. Alpha testing of the resource found that overall, it was acceptable to cancer patients, healthcare professionals and key stakeholders and it was considered a useful resource to support fertility preservation treatment decision-making. However, the healthcare professionals felt that the length of the patient decision aid, and elements of its content may be a barrier to its use. Subsequently, the prototype was reduced to 40 pages. During beta testing of the shortened version in routine care, women who received the resource described its positive impact on their ability to make fertility preservation decisions and support them at a stressful time. However, practical difficulties emerged which impacted upon its wider dissemination in clinical practice and limited some elements of the evaluation planned. Discussion Women receiving the decision aid within the cancer treatment pathway found it helped them engage with decisions about fertility preservation, and make better informed, values-based care plans with oncology and fertility teams. More work is needed to address access and implementation of this resource as part of routine oncology care pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgina L. Jones
- Leeds School of Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Rachael H. Moss
- Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, United Kingdom
| | - Frances Darby
- Leeds School of Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Neda Mahmoodi
- Leeds School of Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Bob Phillips
- Hull-York Medical School and Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Jane Hughes
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Katharina S. Vogt
- Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, United Kingdom
| | - Diana M. Greenfield
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield and Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | | | - Jacqui Gath
- Independent Cancer Patients’ Voice, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Daniel Stark
- Leeds Institute for Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Galina Velikova
- Leeds Institute for Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - John A. Snowden
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield and Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Ellissa Baskind
- Leeds Fertility, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | | | - Daniel Yeomanson
- Haematology and Oncology, Sheffield Children’s Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan Skull
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield and Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Sheila Lane
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Hilary L. Bekker
- Leeds Unit of Complex Intervention Development (LUCID), School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
- Research Centre for Patient Involvement (ResCenPI) Central Region Denmark, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Richard A. Anderson
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Glazer TS, Schulte F. Barriers to Oncofertility Care among Female Adolescent Cancer Patients in Canada. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:1583-93. [PMID: 35323333 PMCID: PMC8947634 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29030133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2022] [Revised: 02/26/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
High survival rates in adolescent cancer patients have shifted the medical focus to the long-term outcomes of cancer treatments. Surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation increase the risk of infertility and infertility-related distress in adolescent cancer patients and survivors. The aims of this narrative review were to (1) describe the psychosocial impacts of cancer-related infertility in adolescents, (2) identify multilevel barriers to fertility preservation (FP) conversations and referrals, and (3) conclude with evidence-based clinical solutions for improving the oncofertility support available to Canadian adolescents. The results of this review revealed that FP decisions occur within the patient, parent, and health care provider (HCP) triad, and are influenced by factors such as parent attitudes, patient maturity, and HCP knowledge. Decision tools and HCP education can promote the occurrence of developmentally appropriate fertility discussions. At the systems level, cost and resource barriers prevent patients from receiving sufficient fertility information and referrals. Clinical models of care (MOCs) can define interdisciplinary roles and referral pathways to improve the integration of oncofertility services into adolescent cancer care. The continued integration of oncofertility care will ensure that all Canadian adolescents receive the exemplary medical and psychological support necessary to make empowered decisions about their own fertility.
Collapse
|
7
|
Witteman HO, Maki KG, Vaisson G, Finderup J, Lewis KB, Dahl Steffensen K, Beaudoin C, Comeau S, Volk RJ. Systematic Development of Patient Decision Aids: An Update from the IPDAS Collaboration. Med Decis Making 2021; 41:736-754. [PMID: 34148384 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x211014163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The 2013 update of the evidence informing the quality dimensions behind the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) offered a model process for developers of patient decision aids. OBJECTIVE To summarize and update the evidence used to inform the systematic development of patient decision aids from the IPDAS Collaboration. METHODS To provide further details about design and development methods, we summarized findings from a subgroup (n = 283 patient decision aid projects) in a recent systematic review of user involvement by Vaisson et al. Using a new measure of user-centeredness (UCD-11), we then rated the degree of user-centeredness reported in 66 articles describing patient decision aid development and citing the 2013 IPDAS update on systematic development. We contacted the 66 articles' authors to request their self-reports of UCD-11 items. RESULTS The 283 development processes varied substantially from minimal iteration cycles to more complex processes, with multiple iterations, needs assessments, and extensive involvement of end users. We summarized minimal, medium, and maximal processes from the data. Authors of 54 of 66 articles (82%) provided self-reported UCD-11 ratings. Self-reported scores were significantly higher than reviewer ratings (reviewers: mean [SD] = 6.45 [3.10]; authors: mean [SD] = 9.62 [1.16], P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Decision aid developers have embraced principles of user-centered design in the development of patient decision aids while also underreporting aspects of user involvement in publications about their tools. Templates may reduce the need for extensive development, and new approaches for rapid development of aids have been proposed when a more detailed approach is not feasible. We provide empirically derived benchmark processes and a reporting checklist to support developers in more fully describing their development processes.[Box: see text].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holly O Witteman
- Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, Canada.,VITAM Research Centre, Quebec City, Canada.,CHU de Québec Research Centre, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Kristin G Maki
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gratianne Vaisson
- Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, Québec, Canada
| | - Jeanette Finderup
- Research Centre for Patient Involvement & Department of Renal Medicine, Aarhus University & Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Krystina B Lewis
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Karina Dahl Steffensen
- Center for Shared Decision Making/Department of Oncology, Lillebaelt University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.,Institute of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Caroline Beaudoin
- Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, Canada
| | - Sandrine Comeau
- Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, Canada
| | - Robert J Volk
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hoffman A, Crocker L, Mathur A, Holman D, Weston J, Campbell S, Housten A, Bradford A, Agrawala S, Woodard TL. Patients' and Providers' Needs and Preferences When Considering Fertility Preservation Before Cancer Treatment: Decision-Making Needs Assessment. JMIR Form Res 2021; 5:e25083. [PMID: 34096871 PMCID: PMC8218210 DOI: 10.2196/25083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2020] [Revised: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As cancer treatments continue to improve, it is increasingly important that women of reproductive age have an opportunity to decide whether they want to undergo fertility preservation treatments to try to protect their ability to have a child after cancer. Clinical practice guidelines recommend that providers offer fertility counseling to all young women with cancer; however, as few as 12% of women recall discussing fertility preservation. The long-term goal of this program is to develop an interactive web-based patient decision aid to improve awareness, access, knowledge, and decision making for all young women with cancer. The International Patient Decision Aid Standards collaboration recommends a formal decision-making needs assessment to inform and guide the design of understandable, meaningful, and usable patient decision aid interventions. OBJECTIVE This study aims to assess providers' and survivors' fertility preservation decision-making experiences, unmet needs, and initial design preferences to inform the development of a web-based patient decision aid. METHODS Semistructured interviews and an ad hoc focus group assessed current decision-making experiences, unmet needs, and recommendations for a patient decision aid. Two researchers coded and analyzed the transcripts using NVivo (QSR International). A stakeholder advisory panel guided the study and interpretation of results. RESULTS A total of 51 participants participated in 46 interviews (18 providers and 28 survivors) and 1 ad hoc focus group (7 survivors). The primary themes included the importance of fertility decisions for survivorship, the existence of significant but potentially modifiable barriers to optimal decision making, and a strong support for developing a carefully designed patient decision aid website. Providers reported needing an intervention that could quickly raise awareness and facilitate timely referrals. Survivors reported needing understandable information and help with managing uncertainty, costs, and pressures. Design recommendations included providing tailored information (eg, by age and cancer type), optional interactive features, and multimedia delivery at multiple time points, preferably outside the consultation. CONCLUSIONS Decision making about fertility preservation is an important step in providing high-quality comprehensive cancer care and a priority for many survivors' optimal quality of life. Decision support interventions are needed to address gaps in care and help women quickly navigate toward an informed, values-congruent decision. Survivors and providers support developing a patient decision aid website to make information directly available to women outside of the consultation and to provide self-tailored content according to women's clinical characteristics and their information-seeking and deliberative styles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aubri Hoffman
- Department of Gynecological Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Laura Crocker
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Aakrati Mathur
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, United States
| | - Deborah Holman
- Department of Gynecological Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - June Weston
- Department of Gynecological Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Sukhkamal Campbell
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Ashley Housten
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Andrea Bradford
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Shilpi Agrawala
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Terri L Woodard
- Department of Gynecological Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
van den Berg M, van der Meij E, Bos AME, Boshuizen MCS, Determann D, van Eekeren RRJP, Lok CAR, Schaake EE, Witteveen PO, Wondergem MJ, Braat DDM, Beerendonk CCM, Hermens RPMG. Development and testing of a tailored online fertility preservation decision aid for female cancer patients. Cancer Med 2021; 10:1576-1588. [PMID: 33580749 PMCID: PMC7940215 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2020] [Revised: 12/20/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Decision making regarding future fertility can be very difficult for female cancer patients. To support patients in decision making, fertility preservation decision aids (DAs) are being developed. However, to make a well‐informed decision, patients need personalized information tailored to their cancer type and treatment. Tailored cancer‐specific DAs are not available yet. Methods Our DA was systematically developed by a multidisciplinary steering group (n = 21) in an iterative process of draft development, three rounds of alpha testing, and revisions. The drafts were based on current guidelines, literature, and patients' and professionals' needs. Results In total, 24 cancer‐specific DAs were developed. In alpha testing, cancer survivors and professionals considered the DA very helpful in decision making, and scored an 8.5 (scale 1–10). In particular, the cancer‐specific information and the tool for recognizing personal values were of great value. Revisions were made to increase readability, personalization, usability, and be more careful in giving any false hope. Conclusions A fertility preservation DA containing cancer‐specific information is important in the daily care of female cancer patients and should be broadly available. Our final Dutch version is highly appraised, valid, and usable in decision making. After evaluating its effectiveness with newly diagnosed patients, the DA can be translated and adjusted according to (inter)national guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle van den Berg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Elleke van der Meij
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Annelies M E Bos
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Christianne A R Lok
- Centre for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eva E Schaake
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Petronella O Witteveen
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marielle J Wondergem
- Department of Hematology, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Didi D M Braat
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Catharina C M Beerendonk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Rosella P M G Hermens
- Department of IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Meisman A, Daraiseh NM, Minar P, Saxe M, Lipstein EA. The Gray Zone: Adolescent and Young Adult Decision Support Needs for Ulcerative Colitis. MDM Policy Pract 2020; 5:2381468320940708. [PMID: 32685687 PMCID: PMC7343374 DOI: 10.1177/2381468320940708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2020] [Accepted: 06/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose. To understand the medical decision support needs specific to adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with ulcerative colitis (UC) and inform development of a decision support tool addressing AYAs' preferences. Methods. We conducted focus groups with AYAs with UC and mentors from a pediatric inflammatory bowel disease clinic's peer mentoring program. Focus groups were led by a single trained facilitator using a semistructured guide aimed at eliciting AYAs' roles in medical decision making and perceived decision support needs. All focus groups were audio recorded, transcribed, and coded by the research team. Data were analyzed using content analysis and the immersion crystallization method. Results. The facilitator led six focus groups: one group with peer mentors aged 18 to 24 years, three groups with patients aged 14 to 17 years, and two groups with patients aged 18 to 24 years. Decision timing and those involved in decision making were identified as interacting components of treatment decision making. Treatment decisions by AYAs were further based on timing, location (inpatient v. outpatient), and family preference for making decisions during or outside of clinic. AYAs involved parents and health care providers in medical decisions, with older participants describing themselves as "final decision makers." Knowledge and experience were facilitators identified to participating in medical decision making. Conclusions. AYAs with UC experience changes to their roles in medical decisions over time. The support needs identified will inform the development of strategies, such as decision support tools, to help AYAs with chronic conditions develop and use skills needed for participating in medical decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Meisman
- Division of Adolescent and Transition Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Nancy M Daraiseh
- James M. Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Phil Minar
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Schubert-Martin Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Marlee Saxe
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Schubert-Martin Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Ellen A Lipstein
- James M. Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Benoit A, Grynberg M, Morello R, Sermondade N, Grandazzi G, Moutel G. Does a web-based decision aid improve informed choice for fertility preservation in women with breast cancer (DECISIF)? Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e031739. [PMID: 32047010 PMCID: PMC7044978 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2019] [Revised: 12/04/2019] [Accepted: 12/05/2019] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Chemotherapy may cause infertility in young survivors of breast cancer. Various fertility preservation techniques increase the likelihood of survivors becoming genetic mothers. Disclosure of cancer diagnosis may impact decision making about fertility preservation. This protocol will develop and test the effectiveness of a web-based decision aid for helping women with breast cancer to make well-informed choices about fertility preservation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This study will be conducted in three phases using mixed methods. In phase I, the aim is to develop a web-based patient decision aid (PDA) in French with a steering committee and using a focus group of five women already treated for breast cancer. In phase II, the face validity of the decision aid will be assessed using questionnaires. In phase III, the PDA will be assessed by a two-arm randomised controlled trial. This will involve a quantitative evaluation of the PDA in clinical practice comparing the quality of the decision-making process between usual care and the PDA. The primary outcome will be informed choice and its components. The secondary outcomes will be decisional conflict and anxiety. Data will be collected during and after an oncofertility consultation. Phase III is underway. Since September 2018, 52 participants have been enrolled in the study and have completed the survey. We expect to have results by February 2020 for a total of 186 patients. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study protocol was approved by the Ouest V Research Ethics Board. Results will be spread through peer-reviewed publications, and reported at suitable meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER The ClinicalTrials.gov registry .(NCT03591848).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Benoit
- UNICAEN, Inserm U1086, ANTICIPE, Normandie Université, Caen, France
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Fertility Preservation, Hôpital Antoine-Béclère, Clamart, France
| | - Michael Grynberg
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Fertility Preservation, Hôpital Antoine-Béclère, Clamart, France
- U1133, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France
| | - Rémy Morello
- UNICAEN, Inserm U1086, ANTICIPE, Normandie Universite, Caen, France
- Biostatistics and Clinical Research Unit, CHU Caen, Caen, France
| | - Nathalie Sermondade
- Department of Cytogenetic and Reproductive Biology, Hôpital Jean Verdier, Bondy, France
| | - Guillaume Grandazzi
- UNICAEN, Inserm U1086, ANTICIPE, Normandie Universite, Caen, France
- Espace Régional de Réflexion éthique, CHU Caen, Caen, France
| | - Grégoire Moutel
- UNICAEN, Inserm U1086, ANTICIPE, Normandie Universite, Caen, France
- Espace Régional de Réflexion éthique, CHU Caen, Caen, France
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Baker DM, Lee MJ, Folan AM, Blackwell S, Robinson K, Wootton R, Sebastian S, Brown SR, Jones GL, Lobo AJ. Development and evaluation of a patient decision aid for patients considering ongoing medical or surgical treatment options for ulcerative colitis using a mixed-methods approach: protocol for DISCUSS study. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e031845. [PMID: 31941765 PMCID: PMC7045112 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Approximately 20%-30% of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) require surgery, the majority of these being elective due to chronic symptoms refractory to medical treatment. The decision for surgery is difficult and dependent on patient preferences. Current resources for patients considering surgery have been found not to meet minimum international standards. The overall aim of the 'DISCUSS' study is to develop and evaluate a new patient decision aid (PtDA) for patients considering surgery for UC created in line with international minimum standards. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This is a prospective mixed-methods study of adults (18+ years) who are considering surgical intervention for UC across two regional centres in Yorkshire, UK. This study is in three stages. In stage 1 we will develop the PtDA and its content via systematic reviews and a patient questionnaire. In stage 2 we will assess the face validity of the PtDA using mixed-methods on key stakeholders using both semistructured interviews and questionnaires, following which the PtDA will be refined. In stage 3 we will assess the acceptability of using the PtDA in clinical practice. This will use a mixed-methods approach on clinicians and patients who are considering undergoing elective surgery. Questionnaires including the Preparation for Decision-Making Scale, a measure of anxiety and decisional conflict will be analysed at two timepoints using paired sample t-tests and CIs. Interviews with patients and clinicians will be analysed using thematic analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Research ethics approval from North East-Tyne & Wear South Research Ethics Committee (Ref: 19/NE/0073) and Health Research Authority approval (Ref: 257044) have been granted. Results will be published in open access peer-reviewed journals, presented in conferences and distributed through the Crohn's and Colitis UK charity. External endorsement will be sought from the International Patient Decision Aid Standards Collaboration inventory of PtDAs. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42018115513, CRD42019126186, CRD42019125193.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Matthew James Lee
- Department of General Surgery, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Anne-Mairead Folan
- Department of Psychology, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
| | | | - Kerry Robinson
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Nurse Specialist, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Rebecca Wootton
- Stoma Care Specialist Nurse, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Shaji Sebastian
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, Kingston upon Hull, UK
| | - Steven R Brown
- Department of General Surgery, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Georgina Louise Jones
- Deparment of Psychology, Leeds Beckett University Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Leeds, UK
| | - Alan J Lobo
- Gastroenterology Unit, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Speller B, Metcalfe K, Kennedy ED, Facey M, Greenblatt E, Scheer AS, Warner E, Joy AA, Wright FC, Baxter NN. The "Begin Exploring Fertility Options, Risks and Expectations" (BEFORE) decision aid: development and alpha testing of a fertility tool for premenopausal breast cancer patients. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2019; 19:203. [PMID: 31660965 PMCID: PMC6819618 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-019-0912-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2018] [Accepted: 09/09/2019] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Premenopausal breast cancer patients are at risk of treatment-related infertility. Many patients do not receive sufficient fertility information before treatment. As such, our team developed and alpha tested the Begin Exploring Fertility Options, Risks, and Expectations decision aid (BEFORE DA). METHODS The BEFORE DA development process was guided by the International Patient Decision Aids Standards and the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. Our team used integrated knowledge translation by collaborating with multiple stakeholders throughout the development process including breast cancer survivors, multi-disciplinary health care providers (HCPs), advocates, and cancer organization representatives. Based on previously conducted literature reviews and a needs assessment by our team - we developed a paper prototype. The paper prototype was finalized at an engagement meeting with stakeholders and created into a graphically designed paper and mirrored online decision aid. Alpha testing was conducted with new and previously engaged stakeholders through a questionnaire, telephone interviews, or focus group. Iterative reviews followed each step in the development process to ensure a wide range of stakeholder input. RESULTS Our team developed an 18-page paper prototype containing information deemed valuable by stakeholders for fertility decision-making. The engagement meeting brought together 28 stakeholders to finalize the prototype. Alpha testing of the paper and online BEFORE DA occurred with 17 participants. Participants found the BEFORE DA usable, acceptable, and most provided enthusiastic support for its use with premenopausal breast cancer patients facing a fertility decision. Participants also identified areas for improvement including clarifying content/messages and modifying the design/photos. The final BEFORE DA is a 32-page paper and mirrored online decision aid ( https://fertilityaid.rethinkbreastcancer.com ). The BEFORE DA includes information on fertility, fertility options before/after treatment, values clarification, question list, next steps, glossary and reference list, and tailored information on the cost of fertility preservation and additional resources by geographic location. CONCLUSION The BEFORE DA, designed in collaboration with stakeholders, is a new tool for premenopausal breast cancer patients and HCPs to assist with fertility discussions and decision-making. The BEFORE DA helps to fill the information gap as it is a tool that HCPs can refer patients to for supplementary information surrounding fertility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittany Speller
- Department of Surgery, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, 040-16 Cardinal Carter Wing, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada
| | - Kelly Metcalfe
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Erin D Kennedy
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada
| | - Marcia Facey
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ellen Greenblatt
- Mount Sinai Fertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Adena S Scheer
- Department of Surgery, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, 040-16 Cardinal Carter Wing, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada
| | - Ellen Warner
- Department of Medical Oncology, Odette Cancer Center, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anil Abraham Joy
- Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Frances C Wright
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nancy N Baxter
- Department of Surgery, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, 040-16 Cardinal Carter Wing, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada.
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
Adolescents and young adults aged 15 to 39 years who are diagnosed with cancer (AYA survivors) undergo a range of therapies for cancer cure but subsequently may be at risk of treatment-related infertility, and for female AYA survivors, adverse pregnancy outcomes. Future fertility is important to AYA survivors. Meeting their fertility goals requires awareness of this importance, knowledge of cancer treatment-related fertility risks, appropriate fertility counseling on these risks, and access to fertility care. Epidemiologic and dissemination and implementation research are needed to estimate more precise risks of traditional and novel cancer therapies on fertility and pregnancy outcomes and improve the delivery of fertility care.
Collapse
|
15
|
McDougall S, Vogt KS, Wilkinson A, Skull J, Jones GL. Outcomes of delivering a fertility preservation service for women with cancer over a 12-year period at a UK assisted conception unit. J OBSTET GYNAECOL 2019; 40:252-259. [PMID: 31392913 DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2019.1621823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
This service evaluation aimed to appraise the delivery of a fertility preservation service for women with cancer which was established in 2005 as part of an Assisted Conception Unit. First, the ACU-database was interrogated between 08/2005 and 01/2017; revealing 174 women received referrals over the 12-year period with a steady referral increase each year. Demographic analyses revealed factors, such as being partnered, to be strong indicators of whether women would seek FP or not. To improve service provision, women who had consented to be contacted for audit, administrative and research purposes, received questionnaires to ascertain their perspectives on the FP decision-making process, their outcomes and ACU after-care. The majority perceived their experience as excellent due to the care they received from ACU staff, speed and efficiency in service delivery. The increasing number of referrals since 2005 is reassuring. However, this audit also highlighted shortcomings of the service, such as limited awareness of the fertility counselling service and lack of after-care.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? There has been an increase in women diagnosed with cancer undergoing fertility preservation (FP) before starting potential gonadotoxic treatment. Offering FP to these women is essential as the ability to have future children is often perceived as equally as important as survivorship, and a source of hope for the future.What do the results of this study add? This study presents a service evaluation, across a 12-year period, of delivering FP services to women with cancer in one UK Assisted Conception Unit (ACU). Women's experiences of the service were evaluated to enhance service delivery and make recommendations for clinical practice.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or future research? The current service evaluation demonstrated increased rates of FP referral over a 12-year period for women with cancer. While this increasing number is reassuring and reflecting increased awareness among professionals and patients; shortcomings in the care pathway were also found: women reported limited opportunity to see fertility counsellors and desired better after care. This information may also be of benefit to other ACUs seeking to enhance and improve service provision in the care of women with cancer, contemplating fertility preservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia McDougall
- Intercalated Medical Student, Medical School, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Anna Wilkinson
- Intercalated Medical Student, Medical School, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Jonathan Skull
- Jessop Wing, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gonçalves V, Travado L, Ferreira PL, Quinn G. Protocol for the development and acceptability of a fertility-related decision aid for young women with breast cancer in Portugal. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e030690. [PMID: 31345986 PMCID: PMC6661612 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2019] [Revised: 06/17/2019] [Accepted: 06/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Young patients with breast cancer may face impaired fertility due to cancer treatments, which often leads to complex fertility decisions. To aid fertility decision-making, it is crucial that women have access to high-quality information; however, their fertility information needs are often unmet. Decision aids (DAs) are educational materials to assist with decision-making, by addressing individual values and preferences. In oncofertility, DAs may constitute a valuable resource to help patients obtain information and make better informed decisions. This paper reports on the protocol of the development and transcreation of a fertility-related DA booklet to support young Portuguese patients with breast cancer, originally developed and validated for an Australian audience. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Recent literature on clinical guidelines will be reviewed. A summary of these guidelines will be created and will inform the first round of DAs revisions. A forward translation process will translate the DA from Australian English to Portuguese. A multidisciplinary Portuguese experts panel will revise and give feedback on the scientific and cultural aspects of the DA content for Portuguese audience. Next, a backward translation process will assess content equivalence between the original and the final adapted version. Finally, Learner Verification (LV) will be used in a qualitative study of young patients with breast cancer and their partners. Two focus groups with 6-10 participants each will be conducted with: (1) recently diagnosed young patients with breast cancer; (2) breast cancer survivors and (3) their partners. Results from the DA acceptability assessment will inform its final version. Data will be analysed using content analysis and constant comparison method to identify key themes/textual units related to LV. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval was granted by the Portuguese Institute of Oncology Porto. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific meetings for academic and health professionals audiences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vânia Gonçalves
- Centre for Health Studies and Research of the University of Coimbra (CEISUC), Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Luzia Travado
- Psycho-oncology, Neuropsychiatry Unit, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Pedro Lopes Ferreira
- Centre for Health Studies and Research of the University of Coimbra (CEISUC), Faculty of Economics, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Gwendolyn Quinn
- Population Health, NYU Langone Health, New York City, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Stern C, Agresta F. Setting up a fertility preservation programme. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2019; 55:67-78. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2018] [Accepted: 07/23/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
18
|
Wang Y, Anazodo A, Logan S. Systematic review of fertility preservation patient decision aids for cancer patients. Psychooncology 2018; 28:459-467. [DOI: 10.1002/pon.4961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2018] [Revised: 11/21/2018] [Accepted: 11/28/2018] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Yifan Wang
- School of Women and Children's Health, Faculty of Medicine; UNSW Sydney; Sydney Australia
| | - Antoinette Anazodo
- School of Women and Children's Health, Faculty of Medicine; UNSW Sydney; Sydney Australia
- Kids Cancer Centre; Sydney Children's Hospital; Sydney Australia
- Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre; Prince of Wales Hospital; Sydney Australia
| | - Shanna Logan
- School of Women and Children's Health, Faculty of Medicine; UNSW Sydney; Sydney Australia
- Kids Cancer Centre; Sydney Children's Hospital; Sydney Australia
- Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre; Prince of Wales Hospital; Sydney Australia
- Fertility & Research Centre; Royal Hospital for Women; Sydney Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Mahmoodi N, Bekker HL, King NV, Hughes J, Jones GL. Are publicly available internet resources enabling women to make informed fertility preservation decisions before starting cancer treatment: an environmental scan? BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2018; 18:104. [PMID: 30453942 PMCID: PMC6245564 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-018-0698-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2018] [Accepted: 10/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To identify publicly available internet resources and assess their likelihood to support women making informed decisions about, and between, fertility preservation procedures before starting their cancer treatment. Methods A survey of publically available internet resources utilising an environmental scan method. Inclusion criteria were applied to hits from searches of three data sources (November 2015; repeated June 2017): Google (Chrome) for patient resources; repositories for clinical guidelines and projects; distribution email lists to contact patient decision aid experts. The Data Extraction Sheet applied to eligible resources elicited: resource characteristics; informed and shared decision making components; engagement health services. Results Four thousand eight hundred fifty one records were identified; 24 patient resources and 0 clinical guidelines met scan inclusion criteria. Most resources aimed to inform women with cancer about fertility preservation procedures and infertility treatment options, but not decision making between options. There was a lack of consistency about how health conditions, decision problems and treatment options were described, and resources were difficult to understand. Conclusions Unless developed as part of a patient decision aid project, resources did not include components to support proactively women’s fertility preservation decisions. Current guidelines help people deliver information relevant to treatment options within a single disease pathway; we identified five additional components for patient decision aid checklists to support more effectively people’s treatment decision making across health pathways, linking current with future health problems. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12911-018-0698-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Mahmoodi
- Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, LS1 3HE, UK.
| | - H L Bekker
- Institute of Health Sciences - School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - N V King
- Institute of Health Sciences - School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - J Hughes
- School of Health & Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - G L Jones
- Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, LS1 3HE, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Anazodo A, Ataman-Millhouse L, Jayasinghe Y, Woodruff TK. Oncofertility-An emerging discipline rather than a special consideration. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2018; 65:e27297. [PMID: 29972282 PMCID: PMC6150802 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.27297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2018] [Revised: 05/16/2018] [Accepted: 05/22/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Originally absent from the oncologist's consult, then placed in a 'quality of life' rubric, oncofertility should now be an essential part of a comprehensive cancer treatment plan in patients of reproductive age, including adolescents and young adults (AYAs). Oncofertility encompasses the endocrine health of the patient, as well as fertility management options. Thus, pubertal transitions in males and females, bone health, and menstrual health are all part of this discipline, enabling practitioners to work in interdisciplinary teams to solve problems in reproductive health. This review provides a summary of the essential considerations required for the assessement of reproductive risk and choice of fertility preservation options as well as considerations for developing oncofertility services for AYAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoinette Anazodo
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- School of Women’s and Children’s Hospital, University of New South Wales, Sydney
| | - Lauren Ataman-Millhouse
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Yasmin Jayasinghe
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology University of Melbourne Royal Women’s Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne
| | - Teresa K. Woodruff
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Vogt KS, Hughes J, Wilkinson A, Mahmoodi N, Skull J, Wood H, McDougall S, Slade P, Greenfield DM, Pacey A, Ledger W, Jones GL. Preserving fertility in women with cancer (PreFer): Decision-making and patient-reported outcomes in women offered egg and embryo freezing prior to cancer treatment. Psychooncology 2018; 27:2725-2732. [DOI: 10.1002/pon.4866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2018] [Revised: 07/03/2018] [Accepted: 07/30/2018] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina S. Vogt
- Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences; Leeds Beckett University; Leeds UK
| | - Jane Hughes
- Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences; Leeds Beckett University; Leeds UK
| | | | - Neda Mahmoodi
- Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences; Leeds Beckett University; Leeds UK
| | - Jonathan Skull
- Reproductive Medicine and Surgery, Assisted Conception; Jessop Wing, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; Sheffield UK
| | - Hilary Wood
- School of Health and Related Research; University of Sheffield; Sheffield UK
| | | | - Pauline Slade
- Institute of Psychology Health and Society; University of Liverpool; Liverpool UK
| | - Diana M. Greenfield
- Late Effects, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust and Honorary Professor, Department of Oncology and Metabolism; University of Sheffield. Weston Park Hospital; Sheffield UK
| | - Allan Pacey
- Academic Unit of Reproductive and Developmental Medicine, Department of Oncology and Metabolism; University of Sheffield; Sheffield UK
| | | | - Georgina L. Jones
- Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences; Leeds Beckett University; Leeds UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
de Man AM, Rashedi A, Nelen W, Anazodo A, Rademaker A, de Roo S, Beerendonk C, Woodruff TK. Female fertility in the cancer setting: availability and quality of online health information. HUM FERTIL 2018; 23:170-178. [DOI: 10.1080/14647273.2018.1506891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Marie de Man
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Alexandra Rashedi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Willianne Nelen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Antoinette Anazodo
- School of Women and Children’s Health Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Alfred Rademaker
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Saskia de Roo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Catharina Beerendonk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Teresa K. Woodruff
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Thom B, Benedict C, Friedman DN, Kelvin JF. The intersection of financial toxicity and family building in young adult cancer survivors. Cancer 2018; 124:3284-3289. [PMID: 29924381 PMCID: PMC6108923 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2018] [Revised: 04/12/2018] [Accepted: 05/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Financial toxicity and family building difficulties may co-occur in young adult cancer survivors. We describe this intersection and propose steps to alleviate associated distress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bridgette Thom
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Danielle N. Friedman
- Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joanne F. Kelvin
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Affiliation(s)
- Verena Ehrbar
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Corinne Urech
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Sibil Tschudin
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Yasmin E, Balachandren N, Davies MC, Jones GL, Lane S, Mathur R, Webber L, Anderson RA. Fertility preservation for medical reasons in girls and women: British fertility society policy and practice guideline. HUM FERTIL 2018; 21:3-26. [DOI: 10.1080/14647273.2017.1422297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ephia Yasmin
- Department of Women’s Health, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | | | - Melanie C. Davies
- Department of Women’s Health, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Georgina L. Jones
- Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK
| | - Sheila Lane
- Department of Paediatric Oncology and Haematology, Children’s Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Raj Mathur
- Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Lisa Webber
- Department of Women’s Health, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Richard A. Anderson
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, Queens Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Ehrbar V, Urech C, Rochlitz C, Dällenbach RZ, Moffat R, Stiller R, Fäh M, von Wolff M, Nawroth F, Dangel A, Germeyer A, Findeklee S, Tschudin S. Fertility Preservation in Young Female Cancer Patients: Development and Pilot Testing of an Online Decision Aid. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2017; 7:30-36. [PMID: 28759303 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2017.0047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Impairment of fertility is a common sequela of successful cancer treatment. Therefore, fertility preservation (FP) should be discussed with all young cancer patients. Decisions about FP are challenging. Patients wish more specific support and the first results concerning the helpfulness of decision aids (DA) were promising. Aside from describing the process of development and the content of an online DA in German, the objective of this study was to pilot test users' satisfaction with the DA and its effect on knowledge about FP and decisional conflict (DC). METHODS In this prospective consecutive study, a control group (n = 20, fertility counseling) was followed by and compared with an intervention group (n = 20, counseling and additional use of the DA, developed by an interdisciplinary team) of recently diagnosed female cancer patients between 18 and 40 years. RESULTS Nearly all participants who applied the DA considered it helpful for decision-making and recommendable. Knowledge about FP was high with regard to FP techniques women went for. DC was moderate according to the mean score (M = 27.92, standard deviation = 13.27) and only in 20%, the score was above the threshold for high DC. There was no difference between the control and intervention group for knowledge and DC. CONCLUSION The DA seems to serve as additional and well-accepted support tool in decision-making for patients and professionals. Referral to a reproductive specialist is crucial to warrant comprehensive information. These results need to be confirmed with the current ongoing randomized controlled study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Verena Ehrbar
- 1 Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Basel , Basel, Switzerland .,2 Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Psychology, University of Basel , Basel, Switzerland
| | - Corinne Urech
- 1 Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Basel , Basel, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Rebecca Moffat
- 1 Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Basel , Basel, Switzerland
| | - Ruth Stiller
- 5 Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Zurich , Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Monika Fäh
- 6 Division of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, University Women's Hospital, University of Bern , Bern, Switzerland
| | - Michael von Wolff
- 6 Division of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, University Women's Hospital, University of Bern , Bern, Switzerland
| | - Frank Nawroth
- 7 Centre for Infertility, Prenatal Medicine, Endocrinology and Osteology , Amedes Hamburg, Germany
| | - Astrid Dangel
- 7 Centre for Infertility, Prenatal Medicine, Endocrinology and Osteology , Amedes Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ariane Germeyer
- 8 Division of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, University Women's Hospital, University Hospital of Heidelberg , Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Findeklee
- 9 Comprehensive Cancer Center ER-MN, University Women's Hospital, University Hospital Friedrich-Alexander , Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany
| | - Sibil Tschudin
- 1 Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Basel , Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|