1
|
Park BC, Drolet BC, Perdikis G. Vanderbilt Mini-PROM-Breast for Breast Reconstruction: A Short-Form, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measure. Plast Reconstr Surg 2024; 153:291e-302e. [PMID: 38266134 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000010620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast reconstruction procedures are among the most commonly performed plastic surgery operations. Although there are well-validated patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) for breast reconstruction, there are several patient-, provider-, and service-level barriers to their implementation in routine clinical settings. Therefore, we developed a short-form PROM to evaluate breast reconstruction outcomes. METHODS Using a mixed-methods approach, the Vanderbilt Mini-PROM-Breast (VMP-B) was constructed and validated to assess patient-reported outcomes from breast reconstruction. Classic test theory methods were used to evaluate acceptability, reliability, and validity. External validation was subsequently performed using the BREAST-Q as a reference standard. RESULTS The VMP-B is a 16-item instrument composed of three domains: quality of life, body image, and breast satisfaction. Psychometric properties including acceptability, reliability, and validity exceeded reference criteria. When tested with 104 patients, the authors found significant benefits of breast reconstruction on quality of life, body image, and breast satisfaction. These results were associated with sizeable effect sizes (g) (g = 0.421, g = 0.520, and g = 1.25) demonstrative of clinically meaningful results. When tested concurrently in 70 patients, the VMP-B and the BREAST-Q showed similar results, exhibiting excellent convergent validity. CONCLUSIONS The VMP-B is a validated short-form PROM that reliably assesses breast reconstruction outcomes. As a short form, the VMP-B decreases both patient and provider burden, which allows for routine, point-of-care collection of breast reconstruction outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Brian C Drolet
- Department of Plastic Surgery
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Philips C, Jacquemin L, Lammers MJW, Mertens G, Gilles A, Vanderveken OM, Van Rompaey V. Listening effort and fatigue among cochlear implant users: a scoping review. Front Neurol 2023; 14:1278508. [PMID: 38020642 PMCID: PMC10656682 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1278508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction In challenging listening situations, speech perception with a cochlear implant (CI) remains demanding and requires high levels of listening effort, which can lead to increased levels of listening-related fatigue. The body of literature on these topics increases as the number of CI users rises. This scoping review aims to provide an overview of the existing literature on listening effort, fatigue, and listening-related fatigue among CI users and the measurement techniques to evaluate them. Methods The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statements were used to conduct the scoping review. The search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to identify all relevant studies. Results In total, 24 studies were included and suggests that CI users experience higher levels of listening effort when compared to normal hearing controls using scales, questionnaires and electroencephalogram measurements. However, executing dual-task paradigms did not reveal any difference in listening effort between both groups. Uncertainty exists regarding the difference in listening effort between unilateral, bilateral, and bimodal CI users with bilateral hearing loss due to ambiguous results. Only five studies were eligible for the research on fatigue and listening-related fatigue. Additionally, studies using objective measurement methods were lacking. Discussion This scoping review highlights the necessity for additional research on these topics. Moreover, there is a need for guidelines on how listening effort, fatigue, and listening-related fatigue should be measured to allow for study results that are comparable and support optimal rehabilitation strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cato Philips
- Experimental Laboratory of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Laure Jacquemin
- Experimental Laboratory of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Marc J. W. Lammers
- Experimental Laboratory of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Griet Mertens
- Experimental Laboratory of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Annick Gilles
- Experimental Laboratory of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Education, Health and Social Work, University College Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Olivier M. Vanderveken
- Experimental Laboratory of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Vincent Van Rompaey
- Experimental Laboratory of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ceuleers D, Baudonck N, Keppler H, Kestens K, Dhooge I, Degeest S. Development of the hearing-related quality of life questionnaire for auditory-visual, cognitive and psychosocial functioning (hAVICOP). J Commun Disord 2023; 101:106291. [PMID: 36508852 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Revised: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 11/27/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is a need for a validated and standardized self-assessment instrument to assess the subjective effect of hearing aid (HA) use and/or cochlear implantation (CI) on different aspects of functioning in daily life. The aim of this study was to develop a new holistic Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) to assess hearing-related quality of life. The new PROM is titled the hearing-related quality of life questionnaire for Auditory-VIsual, COgnitive and Psychosocial functioning (hAVICOP). METHODS A conceptual framework was set up and test items were prepared per domain. Preliminary testing involved a semi-structured interview-based assessment in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired adults and an expert panel. For the further psychometric evaluation, a new sample of 15 adult HA users, 20 adult CI users and 20 normal-hearing adults filled in the refined version of the hAVICOP, the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale, the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire and the TNO-AZL Questionnaire for Adult's Health-Related Quality of Life. Based on these results, a factor analysis was conducted and internal consistency, discriminant validity and concurrent construct validity were determined. RESULTS The final version of the hAVICOP consists of three domains for hearing-related quality of life: (1) auditory-visual functioning, (2) cognitive functioning, and (3) psychosocial functioning. A sufficient internal consistency was found, and discriminant validity and concurrent construct validity were good. CONCLUSIONS A new PROM to assess hearing-related quality of life was developed, named the hAVICOP. In the future the validity and reliability should be examined further.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorien Ceuleers
- Department of Head and Skin, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Nele Baudonck
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Hannah Keppler
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Katrien Kestens
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Ingeborg Dhooge
- Department of Head and Skin, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Sofie Degeest
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abdel-Latif KHA, Meister H. Speech Recognition and Listening Effort in Cochlear Implant Recipients and Normal-Hearing Listeners. Front Neurosci 2022; 15:725412. [PMID: 35221883 PMCID: PMC8867819 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.725412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 12/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The outcome of cochlear implantation is typically assessed by speech recognition tests in quiet and in noise. Many cochlear implant recipients reveal satisfactory speech recognition especially in quiet situations. However, since cochlear implants provide only limited spectro-temporal cues the effort associated with understanding speech might be increased. In this respect, measures of listening effort could give important extra information regarding the outcome of cochlear implantation. In order to shed light on this topic and to gain knowledge for clinical applications we compared speech recognition and listening effort in cochlear implants (CI) recipients and age-matched normal-hearing listeners while considering potential influential factors, such as cognitive abilities. Importantly, we estimated speech recognition functions for both listener groups and compared listening effort at similar performance level. Therefore, a subjective listening effort test (adaptive scaling, “ACALES”) as well as an objective test (dual-task paradigm) were applied and compared. Regarding speech recognition CI users needed about 4 dB better signal-to-noise ratio to reach the same performance level of 50% as NH listeners and even 5 dB better SNR to reach 80% speech recognition revealing shallower psychometric functions in the CI listeners. However, when targeting a fixed speech intelligibility of 50 and 80%, respectively, CI users and normal hearing listeners did not differ significantly in terms of listening effort. This applied for both the subjective and the objective estimation. Outcome for subjective and objective listening effort was not correlated with each other nor with age or cognitive abilities of the listeners. This study did not give evidence that CI users and NH listeners differ in terms of listening effort – at least when the same performance level is considered. In contrast, both listener groups showed large inter-individual differences in effort determined with the subjective scaling and the objective dual-task. Potential clinical implications of how to assess listening effort as an outcome measure for hearing rehabilitation are discussed.
Collapse
|
5
|
Hughes SE, Watkins A, Rapport F, Boisvert I, McMahon CM, Hutchings HA. Rasch Analysis of the Listening Effort Questionnaire-Cochlear Implant. Ear Hear 2021; 42:1699-711. [PMID: 33950866 DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Listening effort may be defined as the attentional and cognitive resources needed to understand an auditory message, modulated by motivation. Despite the use of hearing devices such as hearing aids or cochlear implants (CIs), the requirement for high listening effort remains a challenge for individuals with hearing loss. The Listening Effort Questionnaire-Cochlear Implant (LEQ-CI) is a hearing-specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM), which has been designed for use in the CI candidacy and rehabilitation process to assess perceived listening effort in everyday life in adults with severe-profound hearing loss. The LEQ-CI has been developed in line with international consensus-based standards for best practice in PROM construction. The aim of this study was to improve the measurement precision of the LEQ-CI and to assess its psychometric measurement properties. DESIGN A field test was undertaken with 330 CI patients from five National Health Service auditory implant centers in the United Kingdom. Participants were adults (≥18 years of age), had a severe-profound hearing loss, and met the UK candidacy criteria for cochlear implantation specified by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Participants completed and returned an anonymized 29-item (each with a 5- or 7-point response option), draft version of the LEQ-CI (LEQ-CI29) and a demographic questionnaire. Rasch analysis was undertaken using Winsteps software and the partial credit model to assess rating scale function and item fit. Results informed refinements to produce a 21-item version (LEQ-CI21), which underwent a further Rasch analysis. RESULTS The sample was predominantly female: 60.3% (n = 191). Median age of participants was 66 (range 21 to 89) years, with 7.3% (n = 24) of respondents being CI candidates and 92.7% (n = 306) being CI recipients. Mean duration of implantation was 3.8 (SD = 4.8) years. Initial Rasch analysis of the LEQ-CI29 revealed poor rating scale functioning. Collapsing the 5- and 7-point rating scales to 3- and 4-point scales and removing eight items produced a 21-item PROM (LEQ-CI21). Rasch analysis of the LEQ-CI21 showed good fit to the Rasch measurement model. No items showed misfit and dimensionality analysis supported the existence of a single Rasch dimension, defined as perceived listening effort in daily life. Person reliability was 0.91 and the person separation index was 3.28, establishing four levels of person ability. The item separation index was 9.69, confirming the item hierarchy. No items showed differential item functioning for gender or age. The item difficulty range was -0.81 to 1.05, the person ability range for nonextreme persons was -3.54 to 2.49, and the mean person ability was -0.31. CONCLUSIONS Overall, the LEQ-CI21 was found to meet the Rasch model criteria for interval-level measurement. The LEQ-CI21 is the first PROM to be developed specifically for the measurement of perceived listening effort and one of the first patient-reported outcome measures for use with CI patients to be developed using Rasch analysis. The LEQ-CI21 has the potential to be used as a research tool and in clinical practice to evaluate perceived listening effort in daily life. Further psychometric evaluation of the LEQ-CI21 is planned.
Collapse
|
6
|
Degeest S, Kestens K, Keppler H. Listening Effort Measured Using a Dual-task Paradigm in Adults With Different Amounts of Noise Exposure. Ear Hear 2021. [PMID: 34619684 DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Excessive noise levels can result in hearing damage and/or hearing-related symptoms, thereby leading to impaired communication and, eventually a decrease in the quality of life. Moreover, in daily practice, subjects often indicate that listening in noisy situations is a challenging and often exhausting experience, even in the absence of a clinically significant hearing loss. Hence, a person's perceived difficulty of the listening situation will also be important to consider. It has been suggested that beyond the peripheral factors, there are some central cognitive correlates of speech understanding that are essential for communication abilities. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of the amount of noise exposure on hearing as measured by pure-tone audiometry and otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) on the one hand and listening effort measured using a dual-task paradigm on the other hand. DESIGN The study included 152 adults between 18 and 40 years of age. First, participants completed a self-administered questionnaire regarding the amount of noise exposure. Second, hearing status was evaluated using pure-tone audiometry and transient evoked OAEs (TEOAEs) as well as distortion product OAEs (DPOAEs). Finally, listening effort was evaluated using a dual-task paradigm, which consisted of a primary speech-recognition task in different listening conditions and a secondary visual memory task that were performed both separately and simultaneously. Based on the quartiles of their subjective estimation of noise exposure, the participants were categorized into a group with low noise exposure (lower quartile), moderate noise exposure (two middle quartiles), and high noise exposure (upper quartile). RESULTS There was no significant difference in hearing thresholds between the participants with low, moderate, and high noise exposure for each frequency of the pure-tone audiometry. In contrast, more absent TEOAEs and DPOAEs were found in the high noise exposed group. Regarding the primary speech-recognition task of the dual-task paradigm, no significant difference in speech recognition was found between the different groups of noise exposure. For the amount of listening effort, it was found that across all listening conditions subjects with high noise exposure expend significantly more listening effort compared with subjects with low and moderate noise exposure. CONCLUSIONS This study is a first exploration of the effects of different amounts of noise exposure on listening effort showing that, listening effort is increased in subjects with high noise exposure compared with subjects with low and medium noise exposure. The most plausible hypothesis pertains to an effect of noise exposure on the peripheral and central auditory system, or a combination of effects on both the auditory system and the high-level cognitive functions necessary for speech understanding in the subjects with high levels of noise exposure. As such, a test for listening effort would be useful as part of a comprehensive test battery within the assessment of subjects exposed to noise.
Collapse
|
7
|
James CJ, Graham PL, Betances Reinoso FA, Breuning SN, Durko M, Huarte Irujo A, Royo López J, Müller L, Perenyi A, Jaramillo Saffon R, Salinas Garcia S, Schüssler M, Schwarz Langer MJ, Skarzynski PH, Mecklenburg DJ. The Listening Network and Cochlear Implant Benefits in Hearing-Impaired Adults. Front Aging Neurosci 2021; 13:589296. [PMID: 33716706 PMCID: PMC7947658 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.589296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Older adults with mild or no hearing loss make more errors and expend more effort listening to speech. Cochlear implants (CI) restore hearing to deaf patients but with limited fidelity. We hypothesized that patient-reported hearing and health-related quality of life in CI patients may similarly vary according to age. Speech Spatial Qualities (SSQ) of hearing scale and Health Utilities Index Mark III (HUI) questionnaires were administered to 543 unilaterally implanted adults across Europe, South Africa, and South America. Data were acquired before surgery and at 1, 2, and 3 years post-surgery. Data were analyzed using linear mixed models with visit, age group (18–34, 35–44, 45–54, 55–64, and 65+), and side of implant as main factors and adjusted for other covariates. Tinnitus and dizziness prevalence did not vary with age, but older groups had more preoperative hearing. Preoperatively and postoperatively, SSQ scores were significantly higher (Δ0.75–0.82) for those aged <45 compared with those 55+. However, gains in SSQ scores were equivalent across age groups, although postoperative SSQ scores were higher in right-ear implanted subjects. All age groups benefited equally in terms of HUI gain (0.18), with no decrease in scores with age. Overall, younger adults appeared to cope better with a degraded hearing before and after CI, leading to better subjective hearing performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Petra L Graham
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW, Australia
| | | | | | - Marcin Durko
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Oncology, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Alicia Huarte Irujo
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Juan Royo López
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Lida Müller
- Tygerberg Hospital-Stellenbosch University Cochlear Implant Unit, Tygerberg, South Africa
| | - Adam Perenyi
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery, Albert Szent Györgyi Medical Center, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | | | - Sandra Salinas Garcia
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología y Patología Cérvico-Facial, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mark Schüssler
- Deutsches HörZentrum Hannover der HNO-Klinik, Medizische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yang F, Zhao F, Zheng Y, Li G. Modification and verification of the Infant-Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale: a psychometric analysis combining item response theory with classical test theory. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2020; 18:367. [PMID: 33187553 PMCID: PMC7663878 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-020-01620-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2020] [Accepted: 11/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Early prelingual auditory development (EPLAD) is a fundamental and important process in the speech and language development of infants and toddlers. The Infant–Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (ITMAIS) is a widely used measurement tool for EPLAD, however it has not yet undergone a comprehensive psychometric analysis. The aim of this research was to modify and verify the psychometric properties of ITMAIS using a combination of Item Response Theory (IRT) and Classical Test Theory (CTT). Methods Stage 1—1730 children were retrospectively recruited to enable the application of an IRT model, specifically the graded response model, to modify the ITMAIS. Stage 2—another 450 infants and toddlers with normal hearing or permanent hearing loss before auditory intervention were recruited to verify the psychometric properties of the modified ITMAIS (ITMAIS-m) using the CTT method. Results Using the metric of the graded response model, by removing item 2 from the ITMAIS, ITMAIS-m demonstrated discrimination parameters ranging from 3.947 to 5.431, difficulty parameters from − 1.146 to 1.150, item information distributed between 4.798 and 9.259 and a test information score of 48.061. None of the items showed differential item functioning. ITMAIS-m was further verified in Stage 2, showing Cronbach’s α of 0.919 and item-total correlations ranging from 0.693 to 0.851. There was good convergent validity of ITMAIS-m with other auditory outcome measure (r = 0.932) and pure tone average thresholds (r ranging from − 0.670 to − 0.909), as well as a high ability to discriminate between different hearing grades (Cohen d ranging from 0.41 to 5.83). Conclusions The ITMAIS-m is a reliable and valid tool for evaluating EPLAD in infants and toddlers, which can be efficiently and precisely applied in clinical practice. The combined use of IRT and CTT provides a powerful means to modify psychometrically robust scales aimed at childhood auditory outcome measurements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fengling Yang
- Hearing Center/Hearing and Speech Laboratory, Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Sixth Floor of Clinical Medicine Building, No 16, 3rd part, Renmin Road South, Wuhou District, Chengdu, China
| | - Fei Zhao
- Center for Speech and Language Therapy and Hearing Science, Cardiff School of Sport and Health Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Yun Zheng
- Hearing Center/Hearing and Speech Laboratory, Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Sixth Floor of Clinical Medicine Building, No 16, 3rd part, Renmin Road South, Wuhou District, Chengdu, China.
| | - Gang Li
- Hearing Center/Hearing and Speech Laboratory, Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Sixth Floor of Clinical Medicine Building, No 16, 3rd part, Renmin Road South, Wuhou District, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
|