Diagnostic delay, clinical stage, and social class: a hospital based study

Social class and the risk of dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the prospective longitudinal studies

BACKGROUND

The association between belonging to a disadvantaged socio-economic status or social class and health outcomes has been consistently documented during recent decades. However, a meta-analysis quantifying the association between belonging to a lower social class and the risk of dementia has yet to be performed. In the present work, we sought to summarise the results of prospective, longitudinal studies on this topic.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective, longitudinal studies measuring the association between indicators of social class and the risk of all-cause/Alzheimer's dementia. The search was conducted in four databases (Medline, Embase, Web of Science and PsychInfo). Inclusion criteria for this systematic review and meta-analysis were: (a) longitudinal prospective study, (b) aged ⩾60 years at baseline, (c) issued from the general population, (d) no dementia at baseline and (e) mention of social class as exposure. Exclusion criteria were: (a) study of rare dementia types (e.g. frontotemporal dementia), (b) abstract-only papers and (c) articles without full text available. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the risk of bias in individual studies. We calculated the overall pooled relative risk of dementia for different social class indicators, both crude and adjusted for sex, age and the year of the cohort start.

RESULTS

Out of 4548 screened abstracts, 15 were included in the final analysis (76,561 participants, mean follow-up 6.7 years (2.4-25 years), mean age at baseline 75.1 years (70.6-82.1 years), mean percentage of women 58%). Social class was operationalised as levels of education, occupational class, income level, neighbourhood disadvantage and wealth. Education (relative risk (RR)=2.48; confidence interval (CI) 1.71-3.59) and occupational class (RR=2.09; CI 1.18-3.69) but not income (RR=1.28; CI 0.81-2.04) were significantly associated with the risk of dementia in the adjusted model. Some of the limitations of this study are the inclusion of studies predominantly conducted in high-income countries and the exclusion of social mobility in our analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that there is a significant association between belonging to a social class and the risk of dementia, with education and occupation being the most relevant indicators of social class regarding this risk. Studying the relationship between belonging to a disadvantaged social class and dementia risk might be a fruitful path to diminishing the incidence of dementia over time. However, a narrow operationalisation of social class that only includes education, occupation and income may reduce the potential for such studies to inform social policies.

The effect of diagnostic delay attributable to the healthcare system on the prognosis of colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVES

To analyse the effect of a delay attributable to the healthcare system on a consecutive cohort of outpatients diagnosed with colorectal cancer in the healthcare area of Ourense (Spain).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study that included patients diagnosed between 2009 and 2017. Delay attributable to the healthcare system was defined as the time between the first consultation with symptoms and the diagnostic confirmation. A logistic regression model was performed to evaluate the relationship between stage IV CRC and diagnostic delay. To analyse which variables were associated independently with overall mortality and mortality due to CRC we used a Cox regression model.

RESULTS

575 patients were included (men 64.5%, age 71.9 ± 11.5 years), with a delay attributable to the healthcare system of 115 ± 153 days. None of the variables analysed were associated with tumour stage at diagnosis. With a mean follow-up of 30.6 ± 21 months, 121 patients died (79.3% due to CRC). The variables independently associated with CRC-related mortality were metastatic CRC (HR 50.65, 95% CI 12.28-209), age (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.05) and colonoscopy requested from the Primary Healthcare level (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.36-0.88).

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnostic delay attributable to the healthcare system is not related to the prognosis or stage of CRC. However, a direct referral to colonoscopy from the Primary Healthcare level reduces the risk of mortality in our patients.

Asbetos Exposure, Physical Activity and Colon Cancer: A Case-Control Study

Aims and Background

An association between colon cancer and the occupation of model or pattern maker in the car industry has been repeatedly suggested. The aim of our study was to investigate colon cancer and occupational exposures (in particular in the car industry) in an industrialized area of northern Italy.

Methods

We conducted a hospital-based case-referent study on colon cancer (n = 131; hospital controls, n = 463). All subjects were interviewed, and jobs in the car industry were investigated. Occupational exposure to asbestos and the level of physical activity were blindly assessed. All the jobs were classified according to energy expenditure (less than 8, 8-12 and more than 12 kJ/min).

Results

We found no association between colon cancer and any job in the car industry. No subject had worked as a model or pattern maker. Sedentary work was associated with colon cancer in men but not in women. An excess risk was demonstrated among males for job titles involving putative exposure to asbestos (4 cases and 3 controls; OR = 4.8, 95 % c.i. 1.05-21.5), in particular pipe fitters and boilermakers (3 cases and 1 control; OR = 10.7; 1.07-103).

Factors related with symptom duration until diagnosis and treatment of symptomatic colorectal cancer

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) survival depends mostly on stage at the time of diagnosis. However, symptom duration at diagnosis or treatment have also been considered as predictors of stage and survival. This study was designed to: 1) establish the distinct time-symptom duration intervals; 2) identify factors associated with symptom duration until diagnosis and treatment.

Methods

This is a cross-sectional study of all incident cases of symptomatic CRC during 2006–2009 (795 incident cases) in 5 Spanish regions. Data were obtained from patients’ interviews and reviews of primary care and hospital clinical records. Measurements: CRC symptoms, symptom perception, trust in the general practitioner (GP), primary care and hospital examinations/visits before diagnosis, type of referral and tumor characteristics at diagnosis. Symptom Diagnosis Interval (SDI) was calculated as time from first CRC symptoms to date of diagnosis. Symptom Treatment Interval (STI) was defined as time from first CRC symptoms until start of treatment. Nonparametric tests were used to compare SDI and STI according to different variables.

Results

Symptom to diagnosis interval for CRC was 128 days and symptom treatment interval was 155. No statistically significant differences were observed between colon and rectum cancers. Women experienced longer intervals than men. Symptom presentation such as vomiting or abdominal pain and the presence of obstruction led to shorter diagnostic or treatment intervals. Time elapsed was also shorter in those patients that perceived their first symptom/s as serious, disclosed it to their acquaintances, contacted emergencies services or had trust in their GPs. Primary care and hospital doctor examinations and investigations appeared to be related to time elapsed to diagnosis or treatment.

Conclusions

Results show that gender, symptom perception and help-seeking behaviour are the main patient factors related to interval duration. Health service performance also has a very important role in symptom to diagnosis and treatment interval. If time to diagnosis is to be reduced, interventions and guidelines must be developed to ensure appropriate examination and diagnosis during both primary and hospital care.

Diagnostic delay in oncology: a case report of metastatic seminoma

Germ cell tumours are the most common malignancy among young men; cryptorchidism is a possible risk factor for the development of testicular cancer. Psycho-oncology studies indicate that diagnostic delay can often be explained by different social conditions and that symptoms worsened under lack of appropriate treatment can lead to an urgent admission to the hospital. Nevertheless, germ cell tumours are considered curable malignancies even in advanced stages since the introduction of a chemotherapy regimen based on bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin. Cell lines derived from germ cell tumours are sensitive to cisplatin-based treatment more than other solid cancers, which is reflected in the good clinical response. We report an unusual manifestation of malignancy in an adult man presenting with a metastatic seminoma of the left testicle. The large ulcerate and necrotic mass suggested a secondary infection from a tumour site. The patient reported surgical orchiopexy for left cryptorchidism in his childhood. Despite worsening of physical features, he had not sought help at the hospital for social reasons. The patient achieved complete clinical remission after receiving standard chemotherapy, and a good objective response of the primitive mass was clearly visible. Complete response was persistent at the 30-month clinical follow-up. The chemotherapy administration was later complicated by acute haemorrage in the site of the primitive tumour that needed urgent surgical management; in addition to this, the artificial graft material was rejected and the arterial prosthesis had to be removed.

This case report can be considered for epidemiologic contribute, for clinical relevance despite diagnostic delay and for psycho-oncology studies.

The socioeconomic determinants of cancer

This paper provides a synthesis on socioeconomic inequalities in cancer incidence, mortality and survival across countries and within countries, with particular focus on the Italian context; the paper also describes the underlying mechanisms documented for cancer incidence, and reports some remarks on policies to tackle inequalities.From a worldwide perspective, the burden of cancer appears to be particularly increasing in developing countries, where many cancers with a poor prognosis (liver, stomach and oesophagus) are much more common than in richer countries. As in the case of incidence and mortality, also in cancer survival we observe a great variability across countries. Different studies have suggested a possible impact of health care on the social gradients in cancer survival, even in countries with a National Health System providing equitable access to care.In developed countries, there is increasing awareness of social inequalities as an important public health issue; as a consequence, there is a variety of strategies and policies being implemented throughout Europe. However, recent reviews emphasize that present knowledge on effectiveness of policies and interventions on health inequalities is not sufficient to offer a robust and evidence-based guide to the choice and design of interventions, and that more evaluation studies are needed.The large disparities in health that we can measure within and between countries represent a challenge to the world; social health inequalities are avoidable, and their reduction therefore represents an achievable goal and an ethical imperative.

The relationship between socio-demographic characteristics of patients and diagnostic delay in acute pulmonary thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

In pulmonary thromboembolism (PE), delay to diagnosis is very common. In this study, we examined the role of patients and the socio-demographic characteristics in delayed diagnosis of PE.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We evaluated 156 PE patients for the dates of symptom onset, the dates of first visit to a health institution and diagnosis, signs and symptoms, and the socio-demographic characteristics. Delays were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test, and the predictors were analyzed using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Of the patients, 60.3% visited a health institution within the first day of the symptoms. Mean time from symptoms to the first admission to a health institution (patient delay) was 2.04 ± 3.89 days (median 0 day, range 0-30). Current smoking, a high level of education, and co-morbidity were associated with longer patient delays. The time interval from first symptom to the diagnosis (total delay) was 7.93 ± 10.05 (median 4 days, range 0-45) days. While hypotension, syncope, and previous surgery/trauma were significantly associated with a shorter total delay, a previous visit to any health institution was associated with longer total delay.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, although some socio-demographic characteristics of patients such as smoking, educational status, and co-morbid diseases were found to be associated with delayed visit to any health institution, our results showed that physician or health system delays were more prominent in delayed diagnosis of PE.

Educational inequalities in cancer incidence in Turin, Italy

The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between cancer incidence and socioeconomic status, and to examine the temporal trends in social inequalities in cancer risk. Educational differentials in the incidence of cancer (25 sites) among adult residents of Turin (Italy) were examined using data from the Turin Longitudinal Study and the Piedmont Cancer Registry. The relationship between cancer incidence and educational level was evaluated over three 5-year periods between 1985 and 1999 using Poisson models. An estimated 17% of malignancies among men in the low-educational group were attributable to education, whereas women with a low educational level were slightly protected. Less-educated men had higher risks of upper aero-digestive tract, stomach, lung, liver, rectal, bladder, central nervous system and ill-defined cancers, and lower risks of melanoma, kidney and prostate cancers. Women with lower educational levels were at higher risk of stomach, liver and cervical cancers, whereas they were less likely to be diagnosed with melanoma, ovarian and breast cancers. For most sites, the educational gradient in risk did not vary substantially over time. The educational inequalities in cancer incidence observed in this cohort appear similar in magnitude and direction to socioeconomic inequalities found in other Western countries; for some cancer sites results partly differ from the results of other studies, and require further investigation. A thorough understanding of the relative burden of well-documented causes of social inequalities in cancer risk is essential to address preventive measures and to direct future research on unexplained social differences.

Social inequalities in stage at diagnosis of rectal but not in colonic cancer: a nationwide study

We investigated stage at diagnosis in relation to socioeconomic status (SES) among 15 274 patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma diagnosed in 1996–2004 nationwide in Denmark. The effect of SES on the risk of being diagnosed with distant metastasis was analysed using logistic regression models. A reduction in the risk of being diagnosed with distant metastasis was seen in elderly rectal cancer patients with high income, living in owner–occupied housing and living with a partner. Among younger rectal cancer patients, a reduced risk was seen in those having long education. No social gradient was found among colon cancer patients. The social gradient found in rectal cancer patients was significantly different from the lack of association found among colon cancer patients. There are socioeconomic inequalities in the risk of being diagnosed with distant metastasis of a rectal, but not a colonic, cancer. The different risk profile of these two cancers may reflect differences in symptomatology.

Influences on pre-hospital delay in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: a systematic review

Colorectal cancer is a major global health problem, with survival varying according to stage at diagnosis. Delayed diagnosis can result from patient, practitioner or hospital delay. This paper reports the results of a review of the factors influencing pre-hospital delay - the time between a patient first noticing a cancer symptom and presenting to primary care or between first presentation and referral to secondary care. A systematic methodology was applied, including extensive searches of the literature published from 1970 to 2003, systematic data extraction, quality assessment and narrative data synthesis. Fifty-four studies were included. Patients' non-recognition of symptom seriousness increased delay, as did symptom denial. Patient delay was greater for rectal than colon cancers and the presence of more serious symptoms, such as pain, reduced delay. There appears to be no relationship between delay and patients' age, sex or socioeconomic status. Initial misdiagnosis, inadequate examination and inaccurate investigations increased practitioner delay. Use of referral guidelines may reduce delay, although evidence is currently limited. No intervention studies were identified. If delayed diagnosis is to be reduced, there must be increased recognition of the significance of symptoms among patients, and development and evaluation of interventions that are designed to ensure appropriate diagnosis and examination by practitioners.

Delay in diagnosis and its effect on outcome in head and neck cancer

We examined the records of two cohorts of patients who were seen from 1960 to 1999 with a diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the mouth and throat, one series being retrospective (n=400) and the other prospective (n=213) to find out about delays in diagnosis. The median delay in both cohorts was 3 months and the patients were responsible for the delay in most cases (n=319, 81% and n=160, 78%, respectively). Half the patients in each cohort had delayed diagnoses (n=217, 54% and n=119, 56%, respectively) and similar percentages (n=110, 53% and n=172, 47%) presented with advanced disease (stage III or IV). These were not the same patients for there was no correlation between delay and stage or survival. Logistic regression analysis showed that non-white race (p=0.01) and high-grade histology (p=0.002) predicted advanced disease. The proportion of patients presenting with advanced disease had not changed in 40 years despite public education. We suggest that some tumours may be silent and that initial symptoms do not reliably predict early disease.

Are there socio-economic inequalities in age of resection of colorectal cancer in people with HNPCC?

The relationship between socio-economic status and health has been consistently reported and is thought to be causal. Socio-economic inequalities are present in the incidence of and mortality from cancer in general, but not in the incidence of colorectal cancer in particular. However, there are socio-economic gradients in mortality from colorectal cancer. The socio-economic distribution of incidence of and mortality from colorectal cancer in individuals with hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer (Lynch syndrome) is not known. It is possible that increased awareness of and access to screening for colorectal cancer amongst this group of individuals reduces the socio-economic gradients seen in the population as a whole. We investigated the relationship between socio-economic status and age of resection of colorectal cancer in a cohort of individuals with hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer. More affluent individuals tended to undergo surgical resection for colorectal cancers earlier in their lives than less affluent individuals. This relationship was bordering on statistical significance. This trend probably represents socio-economic variations in access to treatment. In addition, age based diagnostic criteria for hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer may, inadvertently, accentuate socio-economic inequalities in outcome.

Inequality in health: socioeconomic differentials in mortality in Rome, 1990-95

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Population groups with a lower socioeconomic status (SES) have a greater risk of disease and mortality. The aim of this study was to investigate the relation between SES and mortality in the metropolitan area of Rome during the six year period 1990-1995, and to examine variations in mortality differentials between 1990-92 and 1993-95.

DESIGN

Rome has a population of approximately 2,800,000, with 6100 census tracts (CTs). During the study period, 149,002 deaths occurred among residents. The cause-specific mortality rates were compared among four socioeconomic categories defined by a socioeconomic index, derived from characteristics of the CT of residence.

MAIN RESULTS

Among men, total mortality and mortality for the major causes of death showed an inverse association with SES. Among 15-44 year old men, the strong positive association between total mortality and low SES was attributable to AIDS and overdose mortality. Among women, a positive association with lower SES was observed for stomach cancer, uterus cancer and cardiovascular disease, whereas mortality for lung and breast cancers was higher in the groups with higher SES. Comparing the periods 1990-92 and 1993-95, differences in total mortality between socioeconomic groups widened in both sexes. Increasing differences were observed for tuberculosis and lung cancer among men, and for uterus cancer, traffic accidents, and overdose mortality among women.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of an area-based indicator of SES limits the interpretations of the findings. However, despite the possible limitations, these results suggest that social class differences in mortality in Rome are increasing. Time changes in lifestyle and in the prevalence of risk behaviours may produce differences in disease incidence. Moreover, inequalities in the access to medical care and in the quality of care may contribute to an increasing differentials in mortality.

Emergency admission for cancer: a matter of survival?

The objective of this study was to compare the pre-hospital health care process, clinical characteristics at admission and survival of patients with a digestive tract cancer first admitted to hospital either electively or via the emergency department. The study involved cross-sectional analysis of information elicited through personal interview and prospective follow-up. The setting was a 450-bed public teaching hospital primarily serving a low-income area of Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. Two hundred and forty-eight symptomatic patients were studied, who had cancer of the oesophagus (n = 31), stomach (n = 70), colon (n = 82) and rectum (n = 65). The main outcome measures were stage, type and intention of treatment and time elapsed from admission to surgery; the relative risk of death was calculated using Cox's regression. There were 161 (65%) patients admitted via the emergency department and 87 (35%) electively. The type of physician seen at the first pre-hospital visit had more often been a general practitioner in the emergency than in the elective group (89% vs 75%, P < 0.01). Emergency patients had seen a lower number of physicians from symptom onset until admission, but two-thirds had made repeated visits to a primary care physician. Emergency patients were less likely to have a localized tumour and a diagnosis of cancer at admission, and surgery as the initial treatment. Median survival was 30 months for elective patients and 8 months for emergency patients (P < 0.001), and the relative risk of death (RR) was 1.83 (95% confidence interval, CI, 1.32-2.54). After adjustment for strong prognostic factors, emergency patients continued to experience a significant excess risk (RR = 1.58; CI 1.10-2.27). In conclusion, in digestive tract cancers, admission to hospital via the emergency department is a clinically important marker of a poorer prognosis. Emergency departments can only partly counterbalance deficiencies in the effectiveness of and integration among the different levels of the health system.

Social class and cancer survival in Turin, Italy

STUDY OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate social differences in cancer survival in residents of Turin, Italy.

DESIGN

Incident cases from the Piedmont cancer registry were linked to municipality files and 1981 census data, and followed up from 1985-92. The census provided data on education and housing tenure, which were used as indicators of social class. The case fatality ratio (CFR) was estimated through a proportional hazard model, with socioeconomic indicators as risk factors.

MAIN RESULTS

Educated people of both sexes showed better survival for all malignant neoplasms together and, particularly among men, for tumours which show a better prognosis such as cancer of colon-rectum, larynx, prostate, and bladder. The relative risk of dying, compared with people who had only primary school education, decreased from 0.91 for those with middle school education to 0.67 for those who held a university degree.

CONCLUSION

There were major differences in cancer survival showing a poorer outcome for those from the lower social stratum, particularly in sites for which effective treatments are available. Since is unlikely that the observed differences could be totally explained by extraneous factors, such as competing mortality, it is concluded that even in a country where the health system offers universal coverage, non-financial barriers act by creating differences in opportunities for better care.

Do we believe what patients say about their neoplastic symptoms? An analysis of factors that influence the interviewer's judgement

In order to analyze factors that influence an interviewer's judgement of the validity of responses given by patients on the duration of their neoplastic signs and symptoms, 183 consecutive symptomatic patients hospitalized for a digestive tract neoplasm were personally interviewed. The validity of the answers was judged by the interviewers to be high in 156 cases (85%), and low in 27 (15%). The subjective validity of the interview (SVI) was inversely related to the time elapsed from first medical symptom to interview (TFMSI), even after adjusting for the duration of the interview (p < 0.05). SVI was not influenced by whether patient and interviewer agreed on the first symptom. SVI was inversely related to educational level (p < 0.01) and to occupational class (p = 0.04). Patients whose Karnofsky's Index (KI) was > or = 80 were over twice as likely to yield valid responses (TFMSI-adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 2.82, p = 0.037). Multivariate analyses selected education, TFMSI and KI as independent predictors of the interviewer assessment. The SVI of patients admitted to the hospital through the Emergency Department was lower than that of subjects whose admission was planned (OR = 6.49, p = 0.005). In this study SVI related in a logical manner to the characteristics of the interview, of the subjects and of their clinical course. It hence appeared to reasonably estimate the validity of data collected. Identifying factors that affect the reliability of patients' responses would help increase the validity of studies on the duration of cancer symptoms.

Cancer mortality by educational level in Italy

Social differences in health concern both ethics and science. From a public health point-of-view, one must assess actual differences and then try to find explanations. This was made possible for the first time for cancer in Italy via nationwide record-linkage between the 1981 census and the national death index. Over the subsequent six months after census, the study-base included 31,000 deaths for cancer and 18 million person-years at risk. Rate ratio (RR) were estimated through a Poisson regression model adjusted by age and geographic area of residence. Educational level was used as social level indicator. Profound social differences were evident for buccal cavity (RR = 3.10 for lowest cf highest educational level), esophagus (RR = 3.00), stomach (RR = 3.43), and larynx (RR = 3.30) among men, and for stomach (RR = 2.25) and uterus (RR = 1.76) among women. Colon (RR = 0.62) and pancreas cancers (RR = 0.65) presented an inverse relationship among men, as did colon (RR = 0.37), breast (RR = 0.56), ovary (RR = 0.45), and melanoma (RR = 0.62) among women. In conclusion, the Italian population at the beginning of the 1980s had large social differences in the risk of dying from cancer, confirming the patterns commonly found in such other countries as Great Britain, France, and New Zealand. Some dissimilarities, useful for hypothesis generation on the mechanisms of inequality, were evident, such as the generally highest social differences found among northern Italian men and among southern Italian women.