Trauma Transitional Care Coordination: protecting the most vulnerable trauma patients from hospital readmission

From admission to vaccination: COVID-19 vaccination patterns and their relationship with hospitalization in trauma patients

BACKGROUND

COVID-19 vaccination rates in the hospitalized trauma population are not fully characterized and may lag behind the general population. This study aimed to outline COVID-19 vaccination trends in hospitalized trauma patients and examine how hospitalization influences COVID-19 vaccination rates.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective institutional study using our trauma registry paired with the COVID-19 vaccination ENCLAVE registry. We included patients ≥18 years admitted between April 21, 2021 and November 30, 2022. Our primary outcome was the change in vaccination posthospitalization, and secondary analyzed outcomes included temporal trends of vaccination in trauma patients and predictors of non-vaccination. We compared pre and posthospitalization weekly vaccination rates. We performed joinpoint regression to depict temporal trends and multivariate regression for predictors of nonvaccination.

RESULTS

The rate of administration of the first vaccine dose increased in the week after hospitalization (P = .018); however, this increase was not sustained in the following weeks. The percentage of unvaccinated patients declined faster in the general population in Massachusetts compared to the hospitalized trauma population. By the conclusion of the study, 27.1% of the trauma population was unvaccinated, whereas <5% of the Massachusetts population was unvaccinated. Urban residence, having multiple hospitalizations, and experiencing moderate to severe frailty were associated with vaccination. Conversely, being in the age groups 18 to 45 years and 46 to 64 years, as well as having Medicaid or self-pay insurance, were linked to being unvaccinated.

CONCLUSION

Hospitalization initially increased the rate of administration of the first vaccine dose in trauma patients, but the effect was not sustained. By the conclusion of the study period, a greater percentage of trauma patients were unvaccinated compared to the general population of Massachusetts. Strategies for sustained health care integration need to be developed to address this ongoing challenge in the high-risk trauma population.

A multicenter, citywide report on recurrent violent injury

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of and risk factors for recurrent violent trauma are not well known. This information is needed to focus violence prevention efforts on at-risk cohorts. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of and risk factors for recurrence following violent injury in a large urban setting. We hypothesize that the overall incidence of recurrent violent injury is low but there are specific at-risk cohorts.

METHODS

A retrospective, citywide study of patients who sustained blunt assault or penetrating trauma from 2013 to 2019 was performed. Patients were tracked across all trauma centers using their name and date of birth. The primary outcome was incidence of recurrent violent injury, which was calculated by dividing the number of readmitted patients by the number who survived previous admissions due to penetrating trauma or blunt assault. Associations between readmission and injury severity score, abbreviated injury score, age, sex, hospital, mechanism of injury (MOI), and disposition were determined. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted to determine the incidence of recurrent injury over time. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard model was used to examine the relationships between characteristics at first admission and time-to-readmission.

RESULTS

The recurrent injury rate was 836 patients (6.33%) out of 13,211 injured patients. Male, age 14-45 years old, discharge to jail or left against medical advice, and moderate/severe head injury were associated with re-injury. There was no association between recurrence and mechanism of injury or overall injury severity. Discharge to home was associated with a lower re-injury rate.

CONCLUSION

The low recurrent injury rate despite high injury prevalence suggests injury prevention efforts should target this demographic and their non-injured peers.

Navigating Trauma Patients and Families Through Unfamiliar Territory

BACKGROUND

Trauma teams work diligently to manage the complex medical needs of trauma patients. In addition to medical care, there is also a need to assist patients and their families as they navigate the emotional and physical journey of trauma. The role of trauma nurse navigator was developed to address these holistic needs.

OBJECTIVE

This article aims to describe the implementation of a trauma nurse navigator role.

METHODS

This article describes the development and implementation of a trauma nurse navigator role at a Level II trauma center in 2018. The trauma nurse navigator serves as a patient resource and utilizes creative problem solving to optimize care. The trauma nurse navigator also serves on the multidisciplinary team, working with providers, nursing staff, rehabilitation staff, and case management to provide seamless care to trauma patients.

RESULTS

Implementation of the trauma nurse navigator role was well received by patients, families, and the multidisciplinary trauma team. The trauma nurse navigator role expanded the psychosocial support of trauma patients and increased patient satisfaction.

CONCLUSION

Although other specialties have seen the benefits of including a patient navigator on the team, this is a potential for trauma centers as they strive to provide high-quality patient care.

Hospital-based patient navigation programs for patients who experience injury-related trauma and their caregivers: a scoping review

OBJECTIVE

This review's objective is to map the literature on the characteristics, impact, barriers and facilitators of hospital-based patient navigation programmes that support patients who experience injury-related trauma and their caregivers. Patients who experience injury-related trauma frequently require support from multiple care teams and face many challenges to care, both in hospital and when transitioning across settings and services. Patient navigation can improve their care.

DESIGN

This review is conducted according to JBI methodology for scoping reviews. The initial database search took place on 6 June 2021 and the grey literature search took place between September and October 2021. The results are presented in a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses for Scoping Reviews flow diagram.

SETTING

This review considered materials where the patient navigation programmes were delivered in hospital settings. There was no geographical limit to this study.

PARTICIPANTS

This review focused on hospital-based patient navigation programmes for patients who experience injury-related trauma and/or their caregivers.

RESULTS

This review captured 11 records that describe 10 programmes. All programmes were based in the USA. Most programmes provided education, care coordination, discharge planning, and referrals to resources, services, and programmes to assist patients and/or their families in the hospital or the community. Half the programmes were based in level 1 trauma centres. Common impacts included decreases in readmission rates and increases in satisfaction rates. Barriers included difficulty recruiting or enrolling patients with short hospital stays and hospital administrators' and healthcare providers' lack of understanding of the navigator role. Navigator background, either professional or experiential, was identified as a facilitator, as was flexibility in programme delivery and communication methods.

CONCLUSIONS

Eleven records show a small but distinct sample. Reported characteristics, impact, barriers and facilitators were consistent with findings from other patient navigation studies. The results can inform the development and implementation of similar programmes in trauma centres and support changes in policy to improve the delivery of care.

Socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with greater mortality after high-risk emergency general surgery

BACKGROUND

Socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with worse outcomes after elective surgery, but the effect on emergency general surgery (EGS) remains unclear. We examined the association of socioeconomic disadvantage and outcomes after EGS procedures and investigated whether admission to hospitals with comprehensive clinical and social resources mitigated this effect.

METHODS

Adults undergoing 1 of the 10 most burdensome high- and low-risk EGS procedures were identified in six 2014 State Inpatient Databases. Socioeconomic disadvantage was assessed using Area Deprivation Index (ADI) of patient residence. Multivariable logistic regression models adjusting for patient and hospital factors were used to evaluate the association between ADI quartile (high >75 percentile vs. low <25 percentile), and 30-day readmission, in-hospital mortality, and discharge disposition. Effect modification between ADI and (a) level 1 trauma center and (b) safety-net hospital status was tested.

RESULTS

A total of 103,749 patients were analyzed: 72,711 low-risk (70.1%) and 31,038 high-risk procedures (29.9%). Patients from neighborhoods with high socioeconomic disadvantage had a higher proportion with ≥3 comorbidities (41.9% vs. 32.0%), minority race/ethnicity (66.3% vs. 42.4%), and Medicaid (28.8% vs. 14.7%) and were less likely to be treated at level 1 trauma centers (18.3% vs. 27.7%; p < 0.001 for all). Adjusting for competing factors, high socioeconomic disadvantage was associated with increased in-hospital mortality after high-risk procedures (odd ratio, 1.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.66; p = 0.04) and higher odds of non-home discharge (odd ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.30; p = 0.03) for low-risk procedures. Socioeconomic disadvantage was not associated with 30-day readmission for either procedure group. Level 1 trauma status and safety-net hospital did not meaningfully mitigate effect of ADI for any outcome.

CONCLUSION

Socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with increased mortality after high-risk procedures and higher odds of non-home discharge after low-risk procedures. This effect was not mitigated by either level 1 trauma or safety-net hospitals. Interventions that specifically address the needs of socially vulnerable communities will be required to significantly improve EGS outcomes for this population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic and Epidemiologic, level III.

Patient and clinician perceptions of the trauma and acute care surgery hospitalization discharge transition of care: a qualitative study

Objectives

Trauma and acute care surgery (TACS) patients face complex barriers associated with hospitalization discharge that hinder successful recovery. We sought to better understand the challenges in the discharge transition of care, which might suggest interventions that would optimize it.

Methods

We conducted a qualitative study of patient and clinician perceptions about the hospital discharge process at an urban level 1 trauma center. We performed semi-structured interviews that we recorded, transcribed, coded both deductively and inductively, and analyzed thematically. We enrolled patients and clinicians until we achieved data saturation.

Results

We interviewed 10 patients and 10 clinicians. Most patients (70%) were male, and the mean age was 57±16 years. Clinicians included attending surgeons, residents, nurse practitioners, nurses, and case managers. Three themes emerged. (1) Communication (patient-clinician and clinician-clinician): clinicians understood that the discharge process malfunctions when communication with patients is not clear. Many patients discussed confusion about their discharge plan. Clinicians lamented that poorly written discharge summaries are an inadequate means of communication between inpatient and outpatient clinicians. (2) Discharge teaching and written instructions: patients appreciated discharge teaching but found written discharge instructions to be overwhelming and unhelpful. Clinicians preferred spending more time teaching patients and understood that written instructions contain too much jargon. (3) Outpatient care coordination: patients and clinicians identified difficulties with coordinating ongoing outpatient care. Both identified the patient’s primary care physician and insurance coverage as important determinants of the outpatient experience.

Conclusion

TACS patients face numerous challenges at hospitalization discharge. Clinicians struggle to effectively help their patients with this stressful transition. Future interventions should focus on improving communication with patients, active communication with a patient’s primary care physician, repurposing, and standardizing the discharge summary to serve primarily as a means of care coordination, and assisting the patient with navigating the transition.

Level of evidence

III—descriptive, exploratory study.

Fragmentation of care in the blunt abdominal trauma patient: Capturing our true outcomes and impact on care

BACKGROUND

Trauma care is associated with unplanned readmissions, which may occur at facilities other than the index treatment facility. This "fragmentation of care" may be associated with adverse outcomes. We evaluated a statewide database that includes readmissions to analyze the incidence and impact of FC.

METHODS

The California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development patient discharge data set was evaluated for calendar years 2016 to 2018. Patients 15 years or older diagnosed with blunt abdominal solid organ injury during the index admission were identified. Readmissions were evaluated postdischarge at 1, 3, and 6 months. Patients readmitted within 6 months to a facility other than the index admission facility (fragmented care [FC]) were compared with those readmitted to their index admission facility (non-FC). Logistic regression modeling was used to evaluate risk of FC.

RESULTS

Of the total 1,580 patients, there were 752 FC (47.6%) and 828 (52.4%) non-FC. Readmissions representing FC at months 1, 3, and 6 were 40.3%, 49.3%, and 53.4%, respectively. At index admission, the groups were demographically and clinically similar, with similar rates of abdominal operations and complications. Non-FC patients had a higher rate of abdominal reoperation at readmission (5.8% non-FC vs. 2.9% FC, p = 0.006). In an adjusted model, multiple readmissions (odds ratio [OR] 1.11, p = 0.014), readmission >30 days after index facility discharge (OR, 1.98; p < 0.001), and discharge to a nonmedical facility (OR, 2.46; p < 0.0001) were associated with increased odds of FC. Operative intervention at index admission was associated with lower odds of FC (OR, 0.77; p = 0.039). However, FC was not independently associated with demographic or insurance characteristics.

CONCLUSION

The rate of FC among patients with blunt abdominal injury is high. The risk of FC is mitigated when patients are managed operatively during the index admission. Trauma systems should implement measures to ensure that these patients are followed postdischarge.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic and epidemiological, level III; Care management, level IV.

Medicare's Bundled Payments For Care Improvement Initiative Maintained Quality Of Care For Vulnerable Patients

The Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) initiative established four models to test whether linking payments for an episode of care could reduce Medicare payments while maintaining or improving quality. Evaluations concluded that model 2, the largest, generally lowered payments without reducing quality for the average beneficiary, but these global results could mask adverse findings among vulnerable subpopulations. We analyzed changes in emergency department visits, unplanned hospital readmissions, and all-cause mortality within ninety days of hospital discharge among beneficiaries with one or more of three vulnerable characteristics-dementia, dual eligibility for Medicare and Medicaid, and recent institutional care-in 105,458 beneficiary episodes in the period October 2013-December 2016. The results for twelve types of medical and surgical BPCI episodes were evaluated relative to results in matched comparison groups. Our findings suggest that BPCI model 2 did not adversely affect care quality for beneficiaries with vulnerabilities. While this conclusion does not discourage the further development of bundled payment models, policy makers should support ongoing research to ensure that vulnerable populations are not adversely affected by these approaches.

Factors Influencing Nonadherence to Recommended Postdischarge Follow-Up After Trauma

INTRODUCTION

Historically, trauma patients have low adherence to recommended outpatient follow-up plans, which is crucial for improved long-term clinical outcomes. We sought to identify characteristics associated with nonadherence to recommended outpatient follow-up visits.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective examination of inpatient trauma survivors admitted to a level 1 trauma center (March 2017-March 2018). Patients with known alternative follow-up were excluded. All outpatient visits within 1 y from the index admission were identified. The primary outcome was nonadherence, which was noted if a patient failed to follow-up for any specialty recommended in the discharge instructions. Factors for nonadherence studied included age, injury severity score, mechanism, length of stay, number of referrals made, and involvement with a Trauma Recovery Services program. Bivariate and logistic regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

A total of498 patients were identified (69% men, median age 43 y [range, 26-58 y], median injury severity score 14 [range, 9-19]). Among them, 240 (47%) were nonadherent. The most common specialties recommended were orthopedic surgery (56% referred, 19% nonadherent), trauma (54% referred, 35% nonadherent), and neurosurgery (127 referred, 35% nonadherent). Lowest levels of follow-up were seen for nonsurgical referrals. In adjusted analysis, a higher number of referrals made (odds ratio [OR], 2.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.95-3.05) and older age (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.02) were associated with nonadherence. Trauma Recovery Service participants and penetrating trauma patients were more likely to be adherent (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.37-0.97).

CONCLUSIONS

The largest contributor to nonadherence was the number of referrals made; patients who were referred to multiple specialists were more likely to be nonadherent. Peer support services may lower barriers to follow-up.

[Analysis of causes and factors associated with hospital readmission in mild and moderate polythraumatism: An observational study]

BACKGROUND

Early readmissions (ER) occur during the 30 days after discharge, ER are common and expensive, associated with a decrease in the quality of care. The rate of ER in polytraumatic patients (PTP) is estimated between 4.3-15%. Our objective was to identify those factors associated with ER and its characteristics after suffering mild-moderate trauma in our area.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

This is a retrospective observational study, including data of patients with (PTP) mild or moderate admitted between July 2012 and June 2017 in our institution and their ER in public hospitals and/or outpatient centers. Demographic variables, diagnoses, procedures and characteristics of readmissions were collected. After a bivariant analysis was done, a Logistic regression had benn performed to determine risk factors for ER.

RESULTS

1013 patients were included, with median age of 38 years, ISS of 3 points and initial hospital stay of 1 day. 185 patients were readmitted (18.3%). Independent factors associated with ER were: injury mechanism, especially bicycle accident (OR 2.26), comorbidities highlighting HBP (OR 1.83) and COPD (OR 1.98), fracture immobilization (OR 1.99) and hospital admission in the initial care (OR 0.56). The causes of ER were: pain 61.6%, wound infection 15.1%, scheduled cures and deferred interventions 12.97%, medical 6.4% and psychiatric decompensation. 2.7% CONCLUSION: The ERs in mild-moderate PTP are multifactorial, our results show an association between factors such as injury mechanism, the presence of comorbidities and the procedures performed in the sentinel episode and the rate of ER. The implementation of simple interventions at discharge could reduce its incidence clearly.

The health literacy of hospitalized trauma patients: We should be screening for deficiencies

BACKGROUND

Although the impact of health literacy (HL) on trauma patient outcomes remains unclear, recent studies have demonstrated that trauma patients with deficient HL have poor understanding of their injuries, are less likely to comply with follow-up, and are relatively less satisfied with physician communication. In this study, we sought to determine if HL deficiency was associated with comprehension of discharge instructions.

METHODS

In this prospective study, hospitalized trauma patients underwent evaluation of HL prior to discharge. Newest Vital Sign (NVS) instrument was used to score HL as deficient, marginal, or proficient. Three days postdischarge, patients were telephonically administered a six-point scored questionnaire regarding comprehension of discharge instructions. A general linear model was used to determine the association between HL and comprehension of discharge instructions.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients were administered both NVS and discharge instruction questionnaire. Ten (15.9%) patients scored as deficient in HL on the NVS screen, 16 (25.4%) as marginally proficient, and 37 (58.7%) as proficient. The HL proficiency significantly predicted follow-up score with increasing proficiency associated with higher scores on the discharge comprehension assessment (p < 0.001). Adjusted mean scores (± SE) for deficient, marginal, and proficient patients were 2.8 ± 0.5, 3.2 ± 0.4, and 4.7 ± 0.2. Post hoc comparisons demonstrated significant differences between proficient with marginal proficiency (p = 0.002) and deficient proficiency (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Performance on bedside test of HL among trauma inpatients predicted ability to comprehend instructions following hospital discharge. This study supports the value of HL screening prior to discharge. The HL-deficient patients may benefit from a transitional care program to improve comprehension of discharge instructions after leaving the hospital.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/Care Management, level III.

Experiences of suffering multiple trauma: A qualitative study

OBJECTIVES

In an effort to strengthen health care professionals' ability to anticipate and address multiple trauma patients' needs, this study aims to explore the experience of suffering from multiple trauma.

DESIGN

This is a qualitative descriptive study. Nine interviews were analysed using content analysis.

SETTING

The study included patients who had been registered in the Swedish Intensive Care registry [SIR] due to suffering multiple trauma.

FINDINGS

The analysis revealed one theme, A detour in life, based on three sub-themes: (a) Feeling lost and not knowing what to expect, (b) Striving to get life back on track and (c) Dealing with 'dead ends' during rehabilitation. The theme showed that those who suffered multiple trauma did not know what to expect of their recovery and they expressed experiencing a lack of understanding and guidance from healthcare professionals. As it was important to focus on the present and find ways to move on in life, they sought for other ways to find direction in matters of rehabilitation and care.

CONCLUSIONS

A shared understanding is essential in order to define a person's needs. By setting short-term goals and improving documentation, healthcare professionals across the trauma recovery continuum could more easily gain insight of their patients' needs and address them with supportive guidance.

Trauma transitional care coordination: A mature system at work

BACKGROUND

We have previously demonstrated effectiveness of a Trauma Transitional Care Coordination (TTCC) Program in reducing 30-day readmission rates for trauma patients most at risk. With program maturation, we achieved improved readmission rates for specific patient populations.

METHODS

TTCC is a nursing driven program that supports patients at high risk for 30-day readmission. The TTCC interventions include calls to patients within 72 hours of discharge, complete medication reconciliation, coordination of medical appointments, and individualized problem solving. Account IDs were used to link TTCC patients with the Health Services Cost Review Commission database to collect data on statewide unplanned 30-day readmissions.

RESULTS

Four hundred seventy-five patients were enrolled in the TTCC program from January 2014 to September 2016. Only 10.5% (n = 50) of TTCC enrollees were privately insured, 54.5% had Medicaid (n = 259), and 13.5% had Medicare (n = 64). Seventy-three percent had Health Services Cost Review Commission severity of injury ratings of 3 or 4 (maximum severity of injury = 4). The most common All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Groups for participants were: lower-extremity procedures (n = 67, 14%); extensive abdominal/thoracic procedures (n = 40, 8.4%); musculoskeletal procedures (n = 37, 7.8%); complicated tracheostomy and upper extremity procedures (n = 29 each, 6.1%); infectious disease complications (n = 14, 2.9%); major chest/respiratory trauma, major small and large bowel procedures and vascular procedures (n = 13 each, 2.7%). The TTCC participants with lower-extremity injury, complicated tracheostomy, and bowel procedures had 6-point reduction (10% vs. 16%, p = 0.05), 11-point reduction (13% vs. 24%, p = 0.05), and 16-point reduction (11% vs. 27%, p = 0.05) in 30-day readmission rates, respectively, compared to those without TTCC.

CONCLUSION

Targeted outpatient support for high-risk patients can decrease 30-day readmission rates. As our TTCC program matured, we reduced 30-day readmission in patients with lower-extremity injury, complicated tracheostomy and bowel procedures. This represents over one million-dollar savings for the hospital per year through quality-based reimbursement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/care management, level III.

Community Need Index (CNI): a simple tool to predict emergency department utilization after hospital discharge from the trauma service

Background

Emergency department (ED) visits after hospital discharge may reflect failure of transition of care to the outpatient setting. Reduction of postdischarge ED utilization represents an opportunity for quality improvement and cost reduction. The Community Need Index (CNI) is a Zip code-based score that accounts for a community's unmet needs with respect to healthcare and is publicly accessible via the internet. The purpose of this study was to determine if patient CNI score is associated with postdischarge ED utilization among hospitalized trauma patients.

Methods

Level 1 trauma patient admitted between January 2014 and June 2016 were stratified by 30-day postdischarge ED utilization (yes/no). CNI is a nationwide Zip code-based score (1.0-5.0) and was determined per patient from the CNI website. Higher scores indicate greater barriers to healthcare per aggregate socioeconomic factors. Patients with 30-day postdischarge ED visits were compared with those without, evaluating for differences in CNI score and clinical and demographic characteristics.

Results

309 of 3245 patients (9.5%) used the ED. The ED utilization group was older (38.3±15.7 vs. 36.3±16.4 years, p=0.034), more injured (Injury Severity Score 10.4±8.7 vs. 7.7±8.0, p<0.001), and more likely to have had in-hospital complications (17.5% vs. 5.4%, p<0.001). Adjusted for patient age, injury severity, gender, race/ethnicity, penetrating versus blunt injury, alcohol above the legal limit, illicit drug use, the presence of one or more complications and comorbidities, hospital length of stay, and insurance category, CNI score ≥4 was associated with increased utilization (OR 2.0 [95% CI 1.4 to 2.9, p<0.001]).

Discussion

CNI is an easily accessible score that independently predicts postdischarge ED utilization in trauma patients. Patients with CNI score ≥4 are at significantly increased risk. Targeted intervention concerning discharge planning for these patients represents an opportunity to decrease postdischarge ED utilization.

Level of evidence

III, Prognostic and Epidemiological.