Human Effectors of Acute and Chronic GVHD Overexpress CD83 and Predict Mortality

Are we ready for personalized CAR-T therapy?

The future of chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) therapy remains unclear. New studies are constantly being published confirming the efficacy and favorable safety profile of its innovative enhancements. Currently approved CAR-T drugs are manufactured exclusively for a specific patient from the recipient's own cells. This does not close the door to further modifications with subsequent personalization and better adaptation to the individual needs. Bringing such a drug to market would involve raising the already high costs, so it is necessary to lower the existing ones. On the other hand, so-called universal CAR-T are also getting closer to the patient's bed, but its implementation may struggle with multiple challenges, including development of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and alloimmunity. However, that off-the-shelf therapy could prove useful as a quick solution for patients in very poor condition or excluded from current therapy due to manufacturing limitations. The introduction of currently tested solutions may undoubtedly change the current paradigm of treatment.

Broadening the horizon: potential applications of CAR-T cells beyond current indications

Engineering immune cells to treat hematological malignancies has been a major focus of research since the first resounding successes of CAR-T-cell therapies in B-ALL. Several diseases can now be treated in highly therapy-refractory or relapsed conditions. Currently, a number of CD19- or BCMA-specific CAR-T-cell therapies are approved for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), multiple myeloma (MM), and follicular lymphoma (FL). The implementation of these therapies has significantly improved patient outcome and survival even in cases with previously very poor prognosis. In this comprehensive review, we present the current state of research, recent innovations, and the applications of CAR-T-cell therapy in a selected group of hematologic malignancies. We focus on B- and T-cell malignancies, including the entities of cutaneous and peripheral T-cell lymphoma (T-ALL, PTCL, CTCL), acute myeloid leukemia (AML), chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), classical Hodgkin-Lymphoma (HL), Burkitt-Lymphoma (BL), hairy cell leukemia (HCL), and Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM). While these diseases are highly heterogenous, we highlight several similarly used approaches (combination with established therapeutics, target depletion on healthy cells), targets used in multiple diseases (CD30, CD38, TRBC1/2), and unique features that require individualized approaches. Furthermore, we focus on current limitations of CAR-T-cell therapy in individual diseases and entities such as immunocompromising tumor microenvironment (TME), risk of on-target-off-tumor effects, and differences in the occurrence of adverse events. Finally, we present an outlook into novel innovations in CAR-T-cell engineering like the use of artificial intelligence and the future role of CAR-T cells in therapy regimens in everyday clinical practice.

Phase II Study of Myeloablative 7-8/8-Matched Allotransplantation with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide, Tacrolimus, and Mycophenolate Mofetil

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is the major toxicity of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). We hypothesized that a GVHD prophylaxis regimen of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy), tacrolimus (Tac), and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) would be associated with incidences of acute and chronic GVHD in patients receiving a matched or single antigen mismatched HCT. This Phase II study was conducted at the University of Minnesota using a myeloablative regimen of either total body irradiation (TBI) at a total dose of 1320 cGy, administered in 165-cGy fractions, twice daily from day -4 to day -1, or busulfan (Bu) 3.2 mg/kg daily (cumulative area under the curve, 19,000 to 21,000 μmol/min/L) plus fludarabine (Flu) 40 mg/m2 once daily on days -5 to -2, followed by a GVHD prophylaxis regimen of PTCy 50 mg/kg on days +3 and +4, Tac, and MMF beginning on day +5. The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD necessitating systemic immunosuppression (IST) at 1 year post-transplantation. Between March 2018 and May 2022, we enrolled 125 pediatric and adult patients, with a median follow-up of 813 days. The incidence of chronic GVHD necessitating systemic IST at 1 year was 5.5%. The rate of grade II-IV acute GVHD was 17.1%, and that of grade III-IV acute GVHD was 5.5%. Two-year overall survival was 73.7%, and 2-year graft-versus-host disease-free, relapse-free survival was 52.2%. The 2-year cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality was 10.2%, and the rate of relapse was 39.1%. There was no statistically significant difference in survival outcomes between recipients of matched donor transplants versus recipients of 7/8 matched donor transplants. Our data show that myeloablative HCT with PTCy/Tac/MMF results in an extremely low incidence of severe acute and chronic GVHD in well-matched allogeneic HCT.

Phase II, Open-Label Clinical Trial of Urinary-Derived Human Chorionic Gonadotropin/Epidermal Growth Factor for Life-Threatening Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease

Treatments that aid inflammation resolution, immune tolerance, and epithelial repair may improve outcomes beyond high-dose corticosteroids and other broad immunosuppressants for life-threatening acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD). We studied the addition of urinary-derived human chorionic gonadotropin/epidermal growth factor (uhCG/EGF; Pregnyl; Organon, Jersey City, NJ) to standard aGVHD therapy in a prospective Phase II clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02525029). Twenty-two patients with Minnesota (MN) high-risk aGVHD received methylprednisolone 48 mg/m2/day plus 2000 units/m2 of uhCG/EGF s.c. every other day for 1 week. Patients requiring second-line aGVHD therapy received uhCG/EGF 2000 to 5000 units/m2 s.c. every other day for 2 weeks plus standard of care immunosuppression (physician's choice). Responding patients were eligible to receive maintenance doses twice weekly for 5 weeks. Immune cell subsets in peripheral blood were evaluated by mass cytometry and correlated with plasma amphiregulin (AREG) level and response to therapy. Most patients had stage 3-4 lower gastrointestinal tract GVHD (52%) and overall grade III-IV aGVHD (75%) at time of enrollment. The overall proportion of patients with a response at day 28 (primary endpoint) was 68% (57% with complete response, 11% with partial response). Nonresponders had higher baseline counts of KLRG1+ CD8 cells and T cell subsets expressing TIM-3. Plasma AREG levels remained persistently elevated in nonresponders and correlated with AREG expression on peripheral blood T cells and plasmablasts. The addition of uhCG/EGF to standard therapy is a feasible supportive care measure for patients with life-threatening aGVHD. As a commercially available, safe, and inexpensive drug, uhCG/EGF added to standard therapy may reduce morbidity and mortality from severe aGVHD and merits further study.

Phase II Study of Myeloablative 8/8- or 7/8-Matched Allotransplantation with Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide, Tacrolimus, and Mycophenolate Mofetil: Marked Reduction in GVHD Risk Without Increased Relapse Risk Compared to Historical Cyclosporine/Methotrexate

Introduction

Graft-versus host disease (GVHD) is a major limitation to the success of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). We hypothesized that the GVHD prophylaxis regimen of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy), tacrolimus (Tac) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) would reduce the incidence of GVHD in patients receiving a matched or single antigen mismatched HCT without an increase in risk of malignant relapse.

Methods

This is a phase II study conducted at the University of Minnesota using a myeloablative regimen of either: (A) total body irradiation (TBI, total dose 1320 cGy, administered in 165 cGy fractions, twice a day from days -4 to -1) or (B) Busulfan 3.2mg/kg daily (cumulative AUC 19,000 - 21,000 μmol/min/L) plus fludarabine 160mg/m2 days -5 to -2, followed by a GVHD prophylaxis regimen of PTCy (50mg/kg days +3 and +4), Tac and MMF (beginning day +5). The primary endpoint is cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD requiring systemic immunosuppression at 1-year post-transplant. We compared results to our previous myeloablative protocol for matched donors utilizing cyclosporine/methotrexate (CSA/MTX) GVHD prophylaxis.

Results

From March 2018 - June 2022, we enrolled and treated 125 pediatric and adult patients with a median follow up of 472 days. Grade II-IV acute GVHD occurred in 16% (95% confidence interval (CI): 9-23%); Grade III-IV acute GVHD was 4% (CI: 0-8%). No patients experienced grade IV GVHD, and there were no deaths due to GVHD before day 100. Only 3 developed chronic GVHD requiring immune suppression, (4%, CI: 0-8%). Two-year overall survival (OS) was 80% (CI: 69-87%), and (graft-versus-host disease-free, relapse-free survival) GRFS 57% (CI: 45-67%), both higher than historical CSA/MTX. The incidence of grade II-IV aGVHD, cGVHD, and NRM were all lower with PTCy/Tac/MMF compared to historical CSA/MTX. One-quarter (25%) experienced relapse (CI: 15-36%) similar to historical CSA/MTX. There was no statistically significant difference in survival outcomes between recipients of matched versus 7/8 donors.

Conclusion

Myeloablative HCT with PTCy/Tac/MMF results in extremely low incidence of severe acute or chronic GVHD, the primary endpoint of this clinical trial. Relapse risk is not increased compared to our historical CSA/MTX cohort.