Specific GATA-binding elements in the GnRH promoter are required for gene expression pulse activity: role of GATA-4 and GATA-5 in this intermittent process

Mechanisms of Reciprocal Regulation of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH)-Producing and Immune Systems: The Role of GnRH, Cytokines and Their Receptors in Early Ontogenesis in Normal and Pathological Conditions

Different aspects of the reciprocal regulatory influence on the development of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-producing- and immune systems in the perinatal ontogenesis and their functioning in adults in normal and pathological conditions are discussed. The influence of GnRH on the development of the immune system, on the one hand, and the influence of proinflammatory cytokines on the development of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal system, on the other hand, and their functioning in adult offspring are analyzed. We have focused on the effects of GnRH on the formation and functional activity of the thymus, as the central organ of the immune system, in the perinatal period. The main mechanisms of reciprocal regulation of these systems are discussed. The reproductive health of an individual is programmed by the establishment and development of physiological systems during critical periods. Regulatory epigenetic mechanisms of development are not strictly genetically controlled. These processes are characterized by a high sensitivity to various regulatory factors, which provides possible corrections for disorders.

Gene networks activated by specific patterns of action potentials in dorsal root ganglia neurons. Sci Rep. 2017;7:43765. [PMID: 28256583 PMCID: PMC5335607 DOI: 10.1038/srep43765]

Gene regulatory networks underlie the long-term changes in cell specification, growth of synaptic connections, and adaptation that occur throughout neonatal and postnatal life. Here we show that the transcriptional response in neurons is exquisitely sensitive to the temporal nature of action potential firing patterns. Neurons were electrically stimulated with the same number of action potentials, but with different inter-burst intervals. We found that these subtle alterations in the timing of action potential firing differentially regulates hundreds of genes, across many functional categories, through the activation or repression of distinct transcriptional networks. Our results demonstrate that the transcriptional response in neurons to environmental stimuli, coded in the pattern of action potential firing, can be very sensitive to the temporal nature of action potential delivery rather than the intensity of stimulation or the total number of action potentials delivered. These data identify temporal kinetics of action potential firing as critical components regulating intracellular signalling pathways and gene expression in neurons to extracellular cues during early development and throughout life.

A Pit-1 Binding Site Adjacent to E-box133 in the Rat PRL Promoter is Necessary for Pulsatile Gene Expression Activity

Recent evidence reveals that prolactin gene expression (PRL-GE) in mammotropes occurs in pulses, but the molecular process(es) underlying this phenomenon remains unclear. Earlier, we have identified an E-box (E-box133) in the rat PRL promoter that binds several circadian elements and is critical for this dynamic process. Preliminary analysis revealed a Pit-1 binding site (P2) located immediately adjacent to this E-box133 raising the possibility that some type of functional relationship may exist between these two promoter regions. In this study, using serum shocked GH3 cell culture system to synchronize PRL-GE activity, we determined that Pit-1 gene expression occurred in pulses with time phases similar to that for PRL. Interestingly, EMSA analysis not only confirmed Pit-1 binding to the P2 site, but also revealed an interaction with factor(s) binding to the adjacent E-box133 promoter element. Additionally, down-regulation of Pit-1 by siRNA reduced PRL levels during pulse periods. Thus, using multiple evidences, our results demonstrate clearly that the Pit-1 P2 site is necessary for PRL-GE elaboration. Furthermore, the proximity of this critical Pit-1 binding site (P2) and the E-box133 element coupled with the evidences of a site-to-site protein interactions suggest that the process of PRL-GE pulse activity might involve more dynamic and intricate cross-talks between promoter elements that may span some, or all, of the proximal region of the PRL promoter in driving its pulsatile expression.

Genetic mechanisms mediating kisspeptin regulation of GnRH gene expression

Kisspeptins (Kiss) have been shown to be key components in the regulation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) secretion. In vitro studies have demonstrated an increase in GnRH gene expression by Kiss suggesting regulation of GnRH at both the secretory and pretranslational levels. Here, we define genetic mechanisms that mediate Kiss action on target gene expression. In vitro, sequential deletions of the mouse GnRH (mGnRH) gene promoter fused to the luciferase (LUC) reporter gene localized at kisspeptin-response element (KsRE) between -3446 and -2806 bp of the mGnRH gene. In vivo, transgenic mice bearing sequential deletions of the mGnRH gene promoter linked to the LUC reporter localized an identical KsRE. To define the mechanism of regulation, Kiss was first shown to induce nucleosome-depleted DNA within the KsRE, and a potential binding site for the transcription factor, Otx-2, was revealed. Furthermore, increased Otx-2 mRNA, protein, and binding to the KsRE after Kiss treatment were demonstrated. In conclusion, this work identified elements in GnRH-neuronal cell lines and in transgenic mice that mediate positive regulation of GnRH by Kiss. In addition, we show for the first time that Otx-2 is regulated by Kiss, and plays a role in mediating the transcriptional response of mGnRH gene.

Epigenetic changes coincide with in vitro primate GnRH neuronal maturation

Cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying pulsatile GnRH release are not well understood. In the present study, we examined the developmental changes in intracellular calcium dynamics, peptide release, gene expression, and DNA methylation in cultured GnRH neurons derived from the nasal placode of rhesus monkeys. We found that GnRH neurons were functionally immature, exhibiting little fluctuation in intracellular calcium ([Ca(2+)](i)) and sparse pulses of GnRH peptide release in the first 12 d in vitro (div). By 14-18 div, GnRH neurons exhibited periodic [Ca(2+)](i) oscillations, synchronizing at approximately 60-min intervals and GnRH pulses occurred at approximately 60-min intervals. Interestingly, the total GnRH peptide release further increased after 18 div. Measurement of GnRH mRNA and gene CpG methylation status at 0, 14, and 20 div indicated that mRNA levels significantly (P < 0.05) increased between 14 and 20 div, just as maximal decapeptide release was observed. By bisulfite sequencing across a 5' CpG island of the GnRH gene, we further found that methylation at eight of 14 CpG sites significantly (P < 0.05) decreased between 0 and 20 div. These data indicate that epigenetic differentiation occurs during GnRH neuronal development and suggest that increased GnRH gene expression and decreased CpG methylation status are molecular phenotypes of mature GnRH neurons. To our knowledge, this is the first report that developmental DNA demethylation occurs in postmitotic neurons toward a stable neuronal phenotype.

Episodes of prolactin gene expression in GH3 cells are dependent on selective promoter binding of multiple circadian elements

Prolactin (PRL) gene expression in mammotropes occurs in pulses, but the mechanism(s) underlying this dynamic process remains obscure. Recent findings from our laboratory of an E-box in the rat PRL promoter (E-box133) that can interact with the circadian factors, circadian locomoter output cycles kaput (CLOCK) and brain and muscle aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator-like protein (BMAL)-1, and was necessary for pulse activity raised the intriguing possibility that the circadian system may be central to this oscillatory process. In this study, we used serum-shocked GH(3) cells, established previously to synchronize PRL pulses between cells in culture, to reveal that pulses of PRL mRNA are linked temporally to the expression of bmal1, cry1, per1, and per3 mRNA in these cells. Moreover, we found that each of these circadian factors binds to the rat PRL promoter by chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis. Using EMSA analysis, we observed that two sites present in the proximal promoter region, E-box133 and E-box10, bind circadian factors differentially (E-box133 interacted with BMAL1, cryptochrome-1, period (PER)-1, and PER3 but not PER2 and E-box10 bound BMAL1, cryptochrome-1, PER2, PER3 but not PER1). More importantly, down-regulation of any factor binding E-box133 significantly reduced PRL mRNA levels during pulse periods. Our results demonstrate clearly that certain circadian elements binding to the E-box133 site are required for episodes of PRL mRNA expression in serum-shocked GH(3) cultures. Moreover, our findings of binding-related differences between functionally distinct E-boxes demonstrate not only that E-boxes can bind different components but suggest that the number and type of circadian elements that bind to an E-box is central in dictating its function.