beta-Blockade therapy for supraventricular tachyarrhythmias after coronary surgery: a propranolol withdrawal syndrome?

Perioperative beta-blockers for preventing surgery-related mortality and morbidity in adults undergoing cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have yielded conflicting results regarding the ability of beta-blockers to influence perioperative cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Thus routine prescription of these drugs in unselected patients remains a controversial issue. A previous version of this review assessing the effectiveness of perioperative beta-blockers in cardiac and non-cardiac surgery was last published in 2018. The previous review has now been split into two reviews according to type of surgery. This is an update and assesses the evidence in cardiac surgery only.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of perioperatively administered beta-blockers for the prevention of surgery-related mortality and morbidity in adults undergoing cardiac surgery.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Biosis Previews and Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science on 28 June 2019. We searched clinical trials registers and grey literature, and conducted backward- and forward-citation searching of relevant articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included RCTs and quasi-randomized studies comparing beta-blockers with a control (placebo or standard care) administered during the perioperative period to adults undergoing cardiac surgery. We excluded studies in which all participants in the standard care control group were given a pharmacological agent that was not given to participants in the intervention group, studies in which all participants in the control group were given a beta-blocker, and studies in which beta-blockers were given with an additional agent (e.g. magnesium). We excluded studies that did not measure or report review outcomes.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risks of bias. We assessed the certainty of evidence with GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 63 studies with 7768 participants; six studies were quasi-randomized and the remaining were RCTs. All participants were undergoing cardiac surgery, and in most studies, at least some of the participants were previously taking beta-blockers. Types of beta-blockers were: propranolol, metoprolol, sotalol, esmolol, landiolol, acebutolol, timolol, carvedilol, nadolol, and atenolol. In twelve studies, beta-blockers were titrated according to heart rate or blood pressure. Duration of administration varied between studies, as did the time at which drugs were administered; in nine studies this was before surgery, in 20 studies during surgery, and in the remaining studies beta-blockers were started postoperatively. Overall, we found that most studies did not report sufficient details for us to adequately assess risk of bias. In particular, few studies reported methods used to randomize participants to groups. In some studies, participants in the control group were given beta-blockers as rescue therapy during the study period, and all studies in which the control was standard care were at high risk of performance bias because of the open-label study design. No studies were prospectively registered with clinical trials registers, which limited the assessment of reporting bias. We judged 68% studies to be at high risk of bias in at least one domain.Study authors reported few deaths (7 per 1000 in both the intervention and control groups), and we found low-certainty evidence that beta-blockers may make little or no difference to all-cause mortality at 30 days (risk ratio (RR) 0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47 to 1.90; 29 studies, 4099 participants). For myocardial infarctions, we found no evidence of a difference in events (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.52; 25 studies, 3946 participants; low-certainty evidence). Few study authors reported cerebrovascular events, and the evidence was uncertain (RR 1.37, 95% CI 0.51 to 3.67; 5 studies, 1471 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Based on a control risk of 54 per 1000, we found low-certainty evidence that beta-blockers may reduce episodes of ventricular arrhythmias by 32 episodes per 1000 (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.63; 12 studies, 2296 participants). For atrial fibrillation or flutter, there may be 163 fewer incidences with beta-blockers, based on a control risk of 327 incidences per 1000 (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.59; 40 studies, 5650 participants; low-certainty evidence). However, the evidence for bradycardia and hypotension was less certain. We found that beta-blockers may make little or no difference to bradycardia (RR 1.63, 95% CI 0.92 to 2.91; 12 studies, 1640 participants; low-certainty evidence), or hypotension (RR 1.84, 95% CI 0.89 to 3.80; 10 studies, 1538 participants; low-certainty evidence).We used GRADE to downgrade the certainty of evidence. Owing to studies at high risk of bias in at least one domain, we downgraded each outcome for study limitations. Based on effect size calculations in the previous review, we found an insufficient number of participants in all outcomes (except atrial fibrillation) and, for some outcomes, we noted a wide confidence interval; therefore, we also downgraded outcomes owing to imprecision. The evidence for atrial fibrillation and length of hospital stay had a moderate level of statistical heterogeneity which we could not explain, and we, therefore, downgraded these outcomes for inconsistency.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence of a difference in early all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular events, hypotension and bradycardia. However, there may be a reduction in atrial fibrillation and ventricular arrhythmias when beta-blockers are used. A larger sample size is likely to increase the certainty of this evidence. Four studies awaiting classification may alter the conclusions of this review.

Rationale for administering beta-blocker therapy to patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Secondary preventative therapies are essential for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery to optimize perioperative and long-term outcomes. Beta-blockers are commonly used to treat patients with coronary artery disease and congestive heart failure (CHF), but their role for CABG patients remains unclear. The goal of this systematic review was to evaluate the rationale for administering beta-blockers to the CABG population and to assess their efficacy before and after coronary surgical revascularization.

AREAS COVERED

A systematic literature review was performed to retrieve relevant articles from the PubMed database published between 1985 and 2017.

EXPERT OPINION

Outside of the surgical field, strong evidence supports the use of beta-blockers for patients with a history of previous myocardial infarction (MI) or CHF. For the CABG population, studies have suggested that perioperative beta-blocker therapy is beneficial, with an associated reduction in mortality, particularly among those with a history of previous MI or CHF. Beta-blocker administration has also clearly been shown to lower the rate of new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation after CABG. Among the different types of beta-blockers, perioperative carvedilol appears to be the most beneficial. In the absence of contraindications, nearly all CABG patients are candidates for perioperative beta-blocker therapy.

Perioperative beta-blockers for preventing surgery-related mortality and morbidity

BACKGROUND

Randomized controlled trials have yielded conflicting results regarding the ability of beta-blockers to influence perioperative cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Thus routine prescription of these drugs in unselected patients remains a controversial issue.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to systematically analyse the effects of perioperatively administered beta-blockers for prevention of surgery-related mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing any type of surgery while under general anaesthesia.

SEARCH METHODS

We identified trials by searching the following databases from the date of their inception until June 2013: MEDLINE, Embase , the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Biosis Previews, CAB Abstracts, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Derwent Drug File, Science Citation Index Expanded, Life Sciences Collection, Global Health and PASCAL. In addition, we searched online resources to identify grey literature.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials if participants were randomly assigned to a beta-blocker group or a control group (standard care or placebo). Surgery (any type) had to be performed with all or at least a significant proportion of participants under general anaesthesia.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data from all studies. In cases of disagreement, we reassessed the respective studies to reach consensus. We computed summary estimates in the absence of significant clinical heterogeneity. Risk ratios (RRs) were used for dichotomous outcomes, and mean differences (MDs) were used for continuous outcomes. We performed subgroup analyses for various potential effect modifiers.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 88 randomized controlled trials with 19,161 participants. Six studies (7%) met the highest methodological quality criteria (studies with overall low risk of bias: adequate sequence generation, adequate allocation concealment, double/triple-blinded design with a placebo group, intention-to-treat analysis), whereas in the remaining trials, some form of bias was present or could not be definitively excluded (studies with overall unclear or high risk of bias). Outcomes were evaluated separately for cardiac and non-cardiac surgery.CARDIAC SURGERY (53 trials)We found no clear evidence of an effect of beta-blockers on the following outcomes.• All-cause mortality: RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.52, 3783 participants, moderate quality evidence.• Acute myocardial infarction (AMI): RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.51, 3553 participants, moderate quality evidence.• Myocardial ischaemia: RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.05, 166 participants, low quality evidence.• Cerebrovascular events: RR 1.52, 95% CI 0.58 to 4.02, 1400 participants, low quality evidence.• Hypotension: RR 1.54, 95% CI 0.67 to 3.51, 558 participants, low quality evidence.• Bradycardia: RR 1.61, 95% CI 0.97 to 2.66, 660 participants, low quality evidence.• Congestive heart failure: RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.04 to 1.34, 311 participants, low quality evidence.Beta-blockers significantly reduced the occurrence of the following endpoints.• Ventricular arrhythmias: RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.58, number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 29, 2292 participants, moderate quality evidence.• Supraventricular arrhythmias: RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.53, NNTB five, 6420 participants, high quality evidence.• On average, beta-blockers reduced length of hospital stay by 0.54 days (95% CI -0.90 to -0.19, 2450 participants, low quality evidence).NON-CARDIAC SURGERY (35 trials)Beta-blockers significantly increased the occurrence of the following adverse events.• All-cause mortality: RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.57, 11,413 participants, low quality of evidence, number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome (NNTH) 167.• Hypotension: RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.38 to 1.64, NNTH 16, 10,947 participants, high quality evidence.• Bradycardia: RR 2.23, 95% CI 1.48 to 3.36, NNTH 21, 11,033 participants, moderate quality evidence.We found a potential increase in the occurrence of the following outcomes with the use of beta-blockers.• Cerebrovascular events: RR 1.59, 95% CI 0.93 to 2.71, 9150 participants, low quality evidence.Whereas no clear evidence of an effect was found when all studies were analysed, restricting the meta-analysis to low risk of bias studies revealed a significant increase in cerebrovascular events with the use of beta-blockers: RR 2.09, 95% CI 1.14 to 3.82, NNTH 265, 8648 participants.Beta-blockers significantly reduced the occurrence of the following endpoints.• AMI: RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.87, NNTB 76, 10,958 participants, high quality evidence.• Myocardial ischaemia: RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.77, NNTB nine, 978 participants, moderate quality evidence.• Supraventricular arrhythmias: RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.94, NNTB 112, 8744 participants, high quality evidence.We found no clear evidence of an effect of beta-blockers on the following outcomes.• Ventricular arrhythmias: RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.49, 476 participants, moderate quality evidence.• Congestive heart failure: RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.48, 9173 participants, moderate quality evidence.• Length of hospital stay: mean difference -0.45 days, 95% CI -1.75 to 0.84, 551 participants, low quality evidence.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

According to our findings, perioperative application of beta-blockers still plays a pivotal role in cardiac surgery, as they can substantially reduce the high burden of supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias in the aftermath of surgery. Their influence on mortality, AMI, stroke, congestive heart failure, hypotension and bradycardia in this setting remains unclear.In non-cardiac surgery, evidence shows an association of beta-blockers with increased all-cause mortality. Data from low risk of bias trials further suggests an increase in stroke rate with the use of beta-blockers. As the quality of evidence is still low to moderate, more evidence is needed before a definitive conclusion can be drawn. The substantial reduction in supraventricular arrhythmias and AMI in this setting seems to be offset by the potential increase in mortality and stroke.

Cardiology: Post-Cardiothoracic Surgery Atrial Fibrillation: A Review of Preventive Strategies

Objective:

To review the available literature addressing preventive strategies of post-cardiothoracic surgery atrial fibrillation (post-CTS atrial fibrillation).

Data Sources:

Pertinent articles related to the etiology, risk factors, and preventive strategies were identified through a MEDLINE search (1966–March 2007) using the MeSH terms atrial fibrillation, cardiothoracic surgery, cardiac surgery, etiology, neurohormonal, sympathetic, volume, fluid, inflammation, risk factors, operative, pacing, β-adrenergic blockers, amiodarone, sotalol, calcium-channel blockers, magnesium, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, statins, fatty acids, PUFA, steroids, and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs.

Study Selection and Data Extraction:

Articles evaluated were limited to human studies, published in the English language, with a Jadad score greater than 3. References of identified articles were reviewed for additional pertinent articles.

Data Synthesis:

Post-CTS atrial fibrillation most commonly occurs on the second or third postoperative day, with an incidence of 20–50%. Etiology theories include neurohormonal activation, volume overload, and inflammation. Studies examining nonpharmacologic therapies have shown that maintenance of the anterior epicardial fat pad is not a viable prophylactic strategy. Biatrial cardiac pacing, especially in combination with amiodarone, is a viable preventive option. Withdrawal of preoperative β-blockers places patients at higher risk for atrial fibrillation; these drugs should be continued postoperatively. Evidence exists supporting the use of amiodarone, sotalol, and magnesium in addition to β-blockers. Since most of these strategies work by attenuating neurohormonal activation, adverse events, including hypotension and bradycardia, are of concern. Adding agents with antiinflammatory properties, including hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors or corticosteroids, may prove to be of benefit. Additional studies using novel therapies are needed in addition to established preventive strategies.

Conclusions:

Available evidence supports the continuation of preoperative β-blockers, as well as prophylactic amiodarone, sotalol, and magnesium. Other novel therapies, mostly targeting inflammation, are under investigation and may provide additional strategies.

Is the Preoperative Administration of Amiodarone or Metoprolol More Effective in Reducing Atrial Fibrillation: After Coronary Bypass Surgery?

This study examined the influence of preoperative administration of amiodarone and metoprolol in preventing postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF) after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery.The study comprised 251 patients who underwent CABG surgery at our hospital between January 2012 and May 2014. The patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: amiodarone therapy group (n = 122 patients) and metoprolol therapy group (n = 129 patients).In the amiodarone group, the patients received amiodarone tablet orally 1 week before coronary bypass surgery and during the postoperative period. In the metoprolol group, the patients received metoprolol tablet orally 1 week before surgery and during the postoperative period. The AF development rate was retrospectively evaluated between the first 3 days and 4 weeks after surgery.AF developed in 14 patients in the amiodarone group and 16 patients in the metoprolol group 4 weeks after the operation (P = 0.612).No significant difference was observed between the groups in terms of intensive care unit and hospital stay. Furthermore, hospital charges were similar in both groups (P = 0.741).The results of the logistic regression analysis showed age, left ventricular ejection fraction, left atrial diameter, and aortic cross-clamping time to be predictors for postoperative AF.This study demonstrates that amiodarone and metoprolol have similar effects in prevention of AF after cardiac surgery. However, larger-scale studies need to be conducted to substantiate these findings.

Perioperative beta-blockers for preventing surgery-related mortality and morbidity

BACKGROUND

Randomized controlled trials have yielded conflicting results regarding the ability of beta-blockers to influence perioperative cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Thus routine prescription of these drugs in unselected patients remains a controversial issue.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to systematically analyse the effects of perioperatively administered beta-blockers for prevention of surgery-related mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing any type of surgery while under general anaesthesia.

SEARCH METHODS

We identified trials by searching the following databases from the date of their inception until June 2013: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Biosis Previews, CAB Abstracts, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Derwent Drug File, Science Citation Index Expanded, Life Sciences Collection, Global Health and PASCAL. In addition, we searched online resources to identify grey literature.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials if participants were randomly assigned to a beta-blocker group or a control group (standard care or placebo). Surgery (any type) had to be performed with all or at least a significant proportion of participants under general anaesthesia.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data from all studies. In cases of disagreement, we reassessed the respective studies to reach consensus. We computed summary estimates in the absence of significant clinical heterogeneity. Risk ratios (RRs) were used for dichotomous outcomes, and mean differences (MDs) were used for continuous outcomes. We performed subgroup analyses for various potential effect modifiers.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 89 randomized controlled trials with 19,211 participants. Six studies (7%) met the highest methodological quality criteria (studies with overall low risk of bias: adequate sequence generation, adequate allocation concealment, double/triple-blinded design with a placebo group, intention-to-treat analysis), whereas in the remaining trials, some form of bias was present or could not be definitively excluded (studies with overall unclear or high risk of bias). Outcomes were evaluated separately for cardiac and non-cardiac surgery. CARDIAC SURGERY (53 trials)We found no clear evidence of an effect of beta-blockers on the following outcomes.• All-cause mortality: RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.52, 3783 participants, moderate quality of evidence.• Acute myocardial infarction (AMI): RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.51, 3553 participants, moderate quality of evidence.• Myocardial ischaemia: RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.05, 166 participants, low quality of evidence.• Cerebrovascular events: RR 1.52, 95% CI 0.58 to 4.02, 1400 participants, low quality of evidence.• Hypotension: RR 1.54, 95% CI 0.67 to 3.51, 558 participants, low quality of evidence.• Bradycardia: RR 1.61, 95% CI 0.97 to 2.66, 660 participants, low quality of evidence.• Congestive heart failure: RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.04 to 1.34, 311 participants, low quality of evidence.Beta-blockers significantly reduced the occurrence of the following endpoints.• Ventricular arrhythmias: RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.58, number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 29, 2292 participants, moderate quality of evidence.• Supraventricular arrhythmias: RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.53, NNTB six, 6420 participants, high quality of evidence.• On average, beta-blockers reduced length of hospital stay by 0.54 days (95% CI -0.90 to -0.19, 2450 participants, low quality of evidence). NON-CARDIAC SURGERY (36 trials)We found a potential increase in the occurrence of the following outcomes with the use of beta-blockers.• All-cause mortality: RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.54, 11,463 participants, low quality of evidence.Whereas no clear evidence of an effect was noted when all studies were analysed, restricting the meta-analysis to low risk of bias studies revealed a significant increase in all-cause mortality with the use of beta-blockers: RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.59, number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome (NNTH) 189, 10,845 participants.• Cerebrovascular events: RR 1.59, 95% CI 0.93 to 2.71, 9150 participants, low quality of evidence.Whereas no clear evidence of an effect was found when all studies were analysed, restricting the meta-analysis to low risk of bias studies revealed a significant increase in cerebrovascular events with the use of beta-blockers: RR 2.09, 95% CI 1.14 to 3.82, NNTH 255, 8648 participants.Beta-blockers significantly reduced the occurrence of the following endpoints.• AMI: RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.87, NNTB 72, 10,958 participants, high quality of evidence.• Myocardial ischaemia: RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.70, NNTB seven, 1028 participants, moderate quality of evidence.• Supraventricular arrhythmias: RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.92, NNTB 111, 8794 participants, high quality of evidence.Beta-blockers significantly increased the occurrence of the following adverse events.• Hypotension: RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.38 to 1.64, NNTH 15, 10,947 participants, high quality of evidence.• Bradycardia: RR 2.24, 95% CI 1.49 to 3.35, NNTH 18, 11,083 participants, moderate quality of evidence.We found no clear evidence of an effect of beta-blockers on the following outcomes.• Ventricular arrhythmias: RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.30 to 1.33, 526 participants, moderate quality of evidence.• Congestive heart failure: RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.47, 9223 participants, moderate quality of evidence.• Length of hospital stay: mean difference -0.27 days, 95% CI -1.29 to 0.75, 601 participants, low quality of evidence.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

According to our findings, perioperative application of beta-blockers still plays a pivotal role in cardiac surgery , as they can substantially reduce the high burden of supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias in the aftermath of surgery. Their influence on mortality, AMI, stroke, congestive heart failure, hypotension and bradycardia in this setting remains unclear.In non-cardiac surgery, evidence from low risk of bias trials shows an increase in all-cause mortality and stroke with the use of beta-blockers. As the quality of evidence is still low to moderate, more evidence is needed before a definitive conclusion can be drawn. The substantial reduction in supraventricular arrhythmias and AMI in this setting seems to be offset by the potential increase in mortality and stroke.

Postoperative arrhythmias after cardiac surgery: incidence, risk factors, and therapeutic management

Arrhythmias are a known complication after cardiac surgery and represent a major cause of morbidity, increased length of hospital stay, and economic costs. However, little is known about incidence, risk factors, and treatment of early postoperative arrhythmias. Both tachyarrhythmias and bradyarrhythmias can present in the postoperative period. In this setting, atrial fibrillation is the most common heart rhythm disorder. Postoperative atrial fibrillation is often self-limiting, but it may require anticoagulation therapy and either a rate or rhythm control strategy. However, ventricular arrhythmias and conduction disturbances can also occur. Sustained ventricular arrhythmias in the recovery period after cardiac surgery may warrant acute treatment and long-term preventive strategy in the absence of reversible causes. Transient bradyarrhythmias may be managed with temporary pacing wires placed at surgery, but significant and persistent atrioventricular block or sinus node dysfunction can occur with the need for permanent pacing. We provide a complete and updated review about mechanisms, risk factors, and treatment strategies for the main postoperative arrhythmias.

Risk Factors for Post-Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) Atrial Fibrillation and the Role of Aspirin and Beta Blockers in its Prevention

Background: Atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF) is the most common arrhythmia following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and it increases morbidity and mortality associated with this procedure. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the predictability of this arrhythmia using previously identified risk factors and to assess the efficacy of recommended prophylactic beta blocker (BB) therapy in the prevention of post CABG AF. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart analysis of consecutive patients undergoing elective CABG during 1 year period. Patients who developed new onset AF after the surgery were designated as cases and those who did not, as controls. 41 different variables were analyzed using Chi-square test and independent sample t-test. Multivariate analysis was carried out using logistic regression model. Results: 23% patients undergoing CABG developed AF during post-operative period. Statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of age, use of peri-operative Aspirin (ASA), current smoking, previous history of AF, left atrial size, history of congestive heart failure (CHF) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels. In terms of prophylactic therapy, preoperative BB did not independently protect against post CABG AF. On multivariate analysis, only age, use of ASA and previous history of AF remained as independent predictors of post CABG AF. Conclusion: In our study population, the use of preoperative BB did not independently decrease the risk of post-CABGAF. Age, peri-operative ASA use and previous history of AF remained strong independent predictors of post- operative AF.

Interventions for preventing post-operative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing heart surgery

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation is a common post-operative complication of cardiac surgery and is associated with an increased risk of post-operative stroke, increased length of intensive care unit and hospital stays, healthcare costs and mortality. Numerous trials have evaluated various pharmacological and non-pharmacological prophylactic interventions for their efficacy in preventing post-operative atrial fibrillation. We conducted an update to a 2004 Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to gain a better understanding of the effectiveness of these interventions.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to assess the effects of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for preventing post-operative atrial fibrillation or supraventricular tachycardia after cardiac surgery. Secondary objectives were to determine the effects on post-operative stroke or cerebrovascular accident, mortality, cardiovascular mortality, length of hospital stay and cost of treatment during the hospital stay.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of ControlLed Trials (CENTRAL) (Issue 8, 2011), MEDLINE (from 1946 to July 2011), EMBASE (from 1974 to July 2011) and CINAHL (from 1981 to July 2011).

SELECTION CRITERIA

We selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery who were allocated to pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions for the prevention of post-operative atrial fibrillation or supraventricular tachycardia, except digoxin, potassium (K(+)), or steroids.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently abstracted study data and assessed trial quality.

MAIN RESULTS

One hundred and eighteen studies with 138 treatment groups and 17,364 participants were included in this review. Fifty-seven of these studies were included in the original version of this review while 61 were added, including 27 on interventions that were not considered in the original version. Interventions included amiodarone, beta-blockers, sotalol, magnesium, atrial pacing and posterior pericardiotomy. Each of the studied interventions significantly reduced the rate of post-operative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery compared with a control. Beta-blockers (odds ratio (OR) 0.33; 95% confidence interval) CI 0.26 to 0.43; I(2) = 55%) and sotalol (OR 0.34; 95% CI 0.26 to 0.43; I(2) = 3%) appear to have similar efficacy while magnesium's efficacy (OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.41 to 0.73; I(2) = 51%) may be slightly less. Amiodarone (OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.54; I(2) = 63%), atrial pacing (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.36 to 0.61; I(2) = 50%) and posterior pericardiotomy (OR 0.35; 95% CI 0.18 to 0.67; I(2) = 66%) were all found to be effective. Prophylactic intervention decreased the hospital length of stay by approximately two-thirds of a day and decreased the cost of hospital treatment by roughly $1250 US. Intervention was also found to reduce the odds of post-operative stroke, though this reduction did not reach statistical significance (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.47 to 1.01; I(2) = 0%). No significant effect on all-cause or cardiovascular mortality was demonstrated.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Prophylaxis to prevent atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery with any of the studied pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions may be favored because of its reduction in the rate of atrial fibrillation, decrease in the length of stay and cost of hospital treatment and a possible decrease in the rate of stroke. However, this review is limited by the quality of the available data and heterogeneity between the included studies. Selection of appropriate interventions may depend on the individual patient situation and should take into consideration adverse effects and the cost associated with each approach.

Atrial fibrillation independently prolongs hospital stay after coronary artery bypass surgery

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia occurring in patients after coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG).

HYPOTHESIS

The purpose of this study was to determine whether AF independently prolonged postoperative length of stay (LOS).

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing elective CABG were identified. Baseline clinical variables, postoperative course including the development of AF, and postoperative LOS were recorded.

RESULTS

In all, 216 patients (aged 61 +/- 13 years) were examined. Postoperative LOS was 11.3 +/- 6.4 days (median LOS = 9 days). Fifty-five patients (25%) developed AF. Among 16 variables examined, the univariate predictors of LOS included age (p < 0.001), preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (p < 0.001), absence of a prior smoking history (p < 0.05), bypass limited to venous conduits (p < 0.001), postoperative AF (p < 0.001), and the occurrence of a postoperative event (p < 0.001). Length of stay for patients who developed AF was significantly longer than that for patients who did not (15.1 +/- 9.0 vs. 10.0 +/- 4.6 days, p < 0.001). After adjusting for other significant variables, the occurrence of AF after CABG independently prolonged LOS: patients who developed AF stayed 3.2 +/- 1.7 days longer than patients who did not (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Atrial fibrillation lengthens hospital stay after CABG, and its effect is independent of other important variables. Identification of patients who are at risk for AF and successful treatment to prevent AF will likely contribute to major reductions in consumption of health care resources in patients with CABG.

Perioperative beta-blockers for preventing surgery-related mortality and morbidity: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Perioperative beta-blockers are suggested to reduce cardiovascular mortality, myocardial-ischemia/infarction, and supraventricular arrhythmias after surgery. We reviewed the evidence regarding the effectiveness of perioperative beta-blockers for improving patient outcomes after cardiac and noncardiac surgery.

METHODS

Eleven large databases were searched from the time of their inception until October 2005. Various online-resources were consulted for the identification of unpublished trials and conference abstracts. We included randomized, controlled trials comparing perioperative beta-blockers with either placebo or the standard-of-care. Of the 3680 retrieved titles, 69 met inclusion criteria for analysis. Odds ratios (OR) assuming random effects were computed in the absence of significant clinical heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Beta-blockers reduced the frequency of ventricular tachyarrhythmias [OR (cardiac surgery): 0.28, 95% CI 0.13-0.57; OR (noncardiac surgery): 0.56, 95% CI 0.21-1.45], atrial fibrillation/flutter [OR (cardiac surgery): 0.37, 95% CI 0.28-0.48], other supraventricular arrhythmias [OR (cardiac surgery): 0.25, 95% CI 0.18-0.35; OR (noncardiac surgery): 0.43, 95% CI 0.14-1.37], and myocardial ischemia [OR (cardiac surgery): 0.49, 95% CI 0.17-1.4; OR (noncardiac surgery): 0.38, 95% CI 0.21-0.69]. Length of hospitalization was not reduced [weighted mean difference (cardiac surgery): -0.35 days, 95% CI -0.77-0.07; weighted mean difference (noncardiac surgery): -5.59 days, 95% CI -12.22-1.04] and, in contrast to previous reports, beta-blockers did not reduce mortality [OR (cardiac surgery): 0.55, 95% CI 0.17-1.83; OR (noncardiac surgery): 0.78, 95% CI 0.33-1.87], and they had no influence on the occurrence of perioperative myocardial infarction [OR (cardiac surgery): 0.89, 95% CI 0.53-1.5; OR (noncardiac surgery): 0.59; 0.25-1.39].

CONCLUSIONS

Beta-blockers reduced perioperative arrhythmias and myocardial ischemia, but they had no effect on myocardial infarction, mortality, or length of hospitalization.

Pharmacologic Prophylaxis

New-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) occurs frequently in patients after cardiac surgery. The purpose of this study was to review the published trials and to provide clinical practice guidelines for pharmacologic prophylaxis against postoperative AF. Trials of pharmacologic prophylaxis against AF after heart surgery were identified by searching MEDLINE, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and the bibliographies of published reports. Evidence grades and clinical recommendation scores were assigned to each prophylactic drug based on published evidence. Ninety-one trials were identified. The primary study design was a randomized, controlled trial of one drug vs placebo/usual care. Pharmacologic therapies that are reviewed include Vaughan-Williams class II agents (ie, beta-receptor antagonists) [29 trials; 2,901 patients], Vaughan-Williams class III agents (ie, sotalol and amiodarone) [18 trials; 2,978 patients], Vaughan-Williams class IV agents (ie, verapamil and diltiazem) [5 trials; 601 patients], and Vaughan-Williams class I agents (ie, quinidine and procainamide) [3 trials; 246 patients], as well as digitalis (10 trials; 1,401 patients), magnesium (14 trials; 1,853 patients), dexamethasone (1 trial; 216 patients), glucose-insulin-potassium (3 trials; 102 patients), insulin (1 trial; 501 patients), triiodothyronine (2 trials; 301 patients), and aniline (1 trial; 32 patients). A consistent finding in this review is that antiarrhythmic drugs with beta-adrenergic receptor-blocking effects (ie, class II beta-blockers, sotalol, and amiodarone) demonstrated successful prophylaxis. Furthermore, those therapies that did not inhibit beta-receptors generally failed to demonstrate a decreased incidence in postoperative AF. While sotalol and amiodarone have been shown in some studies to be effective, their safety and the incremental prophylactic advantage in comparison with beta-blockers has not been conclusively demonstrated. On the basis of evidence that has been reviewed and graded for quality, it is recommended that strong consideration should be given to the prophylactic administration of Vaughan-Williams class II beta-blocking drugs as a means of lowering the incidence of new-onset post-cardiac surgery AF.

Pharmacological management of atrial fibrillation following cardiac surgery

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common complication following coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). Post-CABG AF occurs most commonly on the second postoperative day and declines in incidence thereafter. A number of risk factors have been found to be associated with a higher frequency of post-CABG AF. These risk factors include advanced age, a prior history of AF, hypertension, and heart failure. Postoperative complications--including low cardiac output, use of an intra-aortic balloon pump, pneumonia, and prolonged mechanical ventilation--are also associated with higher rates of post-CABG AF. Post-CABG AF increases the risk of stroke, and the length and cost of hospitalization. Prophylactic administration of conventional beta-adrenoceptor antagonists (beta-blockers) or sotalol produces a consistent and significant reduction in the incidence of post-CABG AF; however, results with prophylactic amiodarone or magnesium are less consistent. Termination of post-CABG AF, once it occurs, can be accomplished with a number of antiarrhythmic agents. Ibutilide has been the most widely studied agent for this indication. Sotalol is not indicated for cardioversion of AF and has not been studied in the post-CABG setting. Electrical cardioversion and biatrial pacing have also been used to terminate post-CABG AF. Ventricular rate is best controlled with beta-blockers and calcium channel antagonists. Esmolol has a rapid onset of action and is easily titrated to effect. Digoxin can control the ventricular rate, but has a slow onset of action. There are limited data available to guide decisions regarding the optimal management of post-CABG AF.

Interventions for preventing post-operative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing heart surgery

BACKGROUND

Post-operative atrial fibrillation is a common complication of cardiac surgery and has been associated with increased incidence of other complications including post-operative stroke, increased hospital length of stay and increased cost of hospitalisation. Prevention of atrial fibrillation is a reasonable clinical goal and, consequently, many randomised trials have evaluated the effectiveness of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions. We systematically reviewed the literature and prepared meta-analyses to better understand the role and effects of various prophylactic therapies against post-operative atrial fibrillation.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for preventing post-cardiac surgery atrial fibrillation.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL from earliest achievable date to June 2003. We hand searched references from reports and earlier reviews. We searched abstract books and CD-ROMs from annual scientific meetings of American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association, North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology and European Heart Organization between 1997-2003. No language restrictions were applied.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing pharmacological interventions or non-pharmacological interventions with control treatment, placebo or usual care for the prevention of post-operative atrial fibrillation in post-coronary artery bypass grafting or combined CABG and valvular surgery.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers assessed trial quality and extracted data. Study authors were contacted for additional information.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifty eight studies were included with a total of 8565 participants. Interventions included were amiodarone, beta blockers, solatol and pacing. Results favoured treatment for post-operative atrial fibrillation. The data for stroke favoured treatment by a non-significant effect size of 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.51 to 1.28. Similarly, a positive indication for length of stay was derived but it too was not significant with a weighted mean difference of -0.66, 95% confidence interval -0.95 to -0.37. A positive result for cost of hospitalisation in favour of treatment was achieved, but the statistic is not significant due to low power and large standard deviations: a weighted mean difference of -2717, 95% confidence interval 7518 to 2084. Beta-blockers had the greatest magnitude of effect across 28 trials (4074 patients) with an odds ratio (random) of 0.35, 95% confidence interval 0.26 to 0.49. Across all treatment, the odds ratio favoured treatment with a ratio (random) of 0.43, 95% confidence interval 0.37 to 0.51.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

Intervention is favoured across the three pharmacological interventions studied and the one non-pharmacological intervention, pacing. The length of stay data favoured treatment (-0.66, 95% confidence interval -0.95 to -0.37).

The efficacy of supplemental magnesium in reducing atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass is reported from 17% to 53%. Hypomagnesemia after this surgery is considered a contributing factor.

METHODS

Two hundred-two coronary bypass patients were randomized to magnesium (n = 105) or placebo (n = 97). The experimental group received 80-mg magnesium sulfate per kilogram ideal weight in 100 mL dextrose 5% water 30 minutes preoperatively. Postoperatively, patients received 8-mg magnesium sulfate per kilogram ideal weight intravenous per hour more than 48 hours. The control group received dextrose 5% water at these intervals.

RESULTS

After the first bolus serum magnesium was experimental 4.75 mg/dL versus control 1.91 mg/dL, p less than 0.001, and remained different until postoperative day 4 (experimental 2.33 mg/dL vs control 2.26 mg/dL, p = 0.24). Atrial appendage and strap muscle were analyzed after the first bolus and after revascularization. There were no differences between groups in tissue magnesium or calcium. Urinary magnesium was elevated in the experimental (experimental 324.5 mg/24 hours, vs control 45.1 mg/24 hours, p = 0.01). Calcium excretion was higher (experimental 370 mg/24 hours vs control 186 mg/24 hours, p < 0.001) and was associated with lower serum calcium. Serum calcium was higher in the control through the fourth postoperative day. The incidence of atrial fibrillation was experimental 32 of 105 (30.5%) versus control 41 of 97 (42.3%) p = 0.08. Atrial fibrillation was different on the first postoperative day (experimental 3/105, 2.9% vs control 9/97, 9.3%), p = 0.05.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall prophylactic magnesium supplementation does not significantly reduce atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. The only significant benefit of magnesium supplementation was on the first postoperative day.

Pharmacotherapeutic considerations in anesthesia

This article focuses on new findings leading to improved understanding of the pathophysiology and mechanisms of potential drug interactions between anesthetic drugs or techniques and cardiovascular medications in patients scheduled for surgery. Only the most frequently used drugs are reviewed. Elective surgery provides the luxury to consider these risks and alter therapy accordingly. Under urgent circumstances, however, the increased risks associated with these agents should be anticipated with the goal to minimize adverse effects while maintaining optimal cardiovascular function in the perioperative period.

Interventions on prevention of postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing heart surgery: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common complication of cardiac surgery and has been associated with increased incidence of other complications and increased hospital length of stay (LOS). Prevention of AF is a reasonable clinical goal, and, consequently, many randomized trials have evaluated the effectiveness of pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions for prevention of AF. To better understand the role of various prophylactic therapies against postoperative AF, a systematic review of evidence from randomized trials was performed.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Fifty-two randomized trials (controlled by placebo or routine treatment) of beta-blockers, sotalol, amiodarone, or pacing were identified by systematic literature search. The 3 drug treatments each prevented AF with the following odds ratios (ORs): beta-blockers, 0.39 (95% CI, 0.28 to 0.52); sotalol, 0.35 (95% CI, 0.26 to 0.49); and amiodarone, 0.48 (95% CI, 0.37 to 0.61). Pacing was also effective; for biatrial pacing, the OR was 0.46 (95% CI, 0.30 to 0.71). The influence of pharmacological interventions on LOS was as follows: -0.66 day (95% CI, 2.04 to 0.72) for beta-blockers; -0.40 day (95% CI, 0.87 to 0.08) for sotalol; and -0.91 day (95% CI, 1.59 to -0.23) for amiodarone. The influence for biatrial pacing was -1.54 day (95% CI, -2.85 to -0.24). The incidence of stroke was 1.2% in all the treatment groups combined and 1.4% in controls (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.46 to 1.74).

CONCLUSIONS

Beta-blockers, sotalol, and amiodarone all reduce risk of postoperative AF with no marked difference between them. There is evidence that use of these drugs will reduce LOS. Biatrial pacing is a promising new treatment opportunity. There was no evidence that reducing postoperative AF reduces stroke; however, data on stroke are incomplete.

Amiodarone versus a beta-blocker to prevent atrial fibrillation after cardiovascular surgery

BACKGROUND

Both amiodarone and beta-blockers have been shown to decrease the incidence of atrial fibrillation after cardiovascular surgery. However, the superior agent has not been identified.

METHODS

We performed a pilot study on 102 patients (68 men, mean age 65 +/- 10 years, mean left ventricular ejection fraction 0.53 +/- 0.12) undergoing cardiovascular surgery (94 coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG], 5 valvular surgery only, and 3 CABG + valvular surgery). The patients were randomized to receive amiodarone (1 g/d intravenously x 48 hours, then 400 mg/d orally until discharge) or propranolol (1 mg intravenously every 6 hours x 48 hours, then 20 mg orally four times a day until discharge). Atrial fibrillation was defined as lasting longer than 1 hour or resulting in hemodynamic compromise.

RESULTS

The incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation was 16.0% (8/50) in the amiodarone group and 32.7% (17/52) in the propranolol group (P =.05). The mean length of stay was 8.8 +/- 3.5 days for amiodarone-treated patients and 8.4 +/- 2.7 days for propranolol-treated patients (P not significant). Serious adverse events were uncommon and similar in each group.

CONCLUSION

Early intravenous amiodarone, followed by oral amiodarone, appears to be superior to propranolol in the prevention of postoperative atrial fibrillation. It is well tolerated and can be started at the time of surgery. However, the use of amiodarone did not result in a reduction in the length of hospital stay.

Atrial fibrillation after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery

OBJECTIVES

The study compared the adjusted risk for developing atrial fibrillation (AF) after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery (MIDCAB) and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG).

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation results in increased morbidity and delays hospital discharge after CABG. Recently, MIDCAB has been explored as an alternative to CABG. Because of differences in surgical approach between the two procedures, the incidence of AF may differ.

METHODS

Randomly selected patients undergoing CABG and MIDCAB were examined. Baseline variables and postoperative course were recorded through review of medical record data.

RESULTS

The MIDCAB patients were younger than CABG patients (64+/-12 vs. 67+/-10, p<0.04) and had less extensive coronary artery disease (53% of MIDCAB vs. 3% of CABG had single-vessel disease, while 15% of MIDCAB vs. 69% of CABG had triple-vessel disease, p<0.001 for overall group comparisons). No other differences in clinical or treatment data were noted. Postoperative AF occurred less often after MIDCAB (23% vs. 39%, p = 0.02). Other significant factors associated with postoperative AF included age (p = 0.0024), prior AF (p = 0.0007), left main disease (p = 0.01), number of vessels bypassed (p = 0.009), absence of postoperative beta-blocker therapy (p = 0.0001), and a serious postoperative complication (p = 0.0018). Because of differences between CABG and MIDCAB patients, multivariate logistic analysis was performed to determine independent predictors of postoperative AF. The type of surgery (CABG vs. MIDCAB) was no longer a significant predictor of postoperative AF (estimated relative risk for AF in CABG vs. MIDCAB patients: 1.57, 95% confidence interval (0.82-2.52).

CONCLUSIONS

Although AF appears to be less common after MIDCAB than after CABG, the lower incidence is due to different clinical characteristics of patients undergoing these procedures.

Cardiac surgery: postoperative arrhythmias

Arrhythmias are common after surgery, particularly after cardiac surgery. Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia encountered postoperatively, although ventricular arrhythmias and conduction disturbances can also occur. Older age is the most consistent predictor of postoperative atrial arrhythmias. beta-adrenergic blockers, amiodarone, and sotalol are the most effective at preventing postoperative atrial fibrillation. Sustained ventricular arrhythmias in the recovery period after cardiac surgery warrant aggressive therapy, usually with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in the absence of reversible causes. Postoperative, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in the setting of left ventricular dysfunction and ischemic coronary disease also usually warrants risk stratification and possible treatment, often with electrophysiologic testing and implantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, if sustained ventricular arrhythmias are induced. Transient bradyarrhythmias may be managed with temporary pacing wires placed at surgery, but significant and persistent atrioventricular block or sinus node dysfunction can occur and indicate a need for permanent pacing.

Residual atrial fibrillation and clinical consequences following postoperative supraventricular arrhythmias

AIMS

This retrospective study investigated whether the supraventricular arrhythmias (SVA) observed during cardiac surgery are limited to or persist beyond the postoperative period, their clinical consequences and whether they are influenced by preoperative and postoperative factors.

METHODS

A total of 375 patients undergoing elective bypass graft surgery over a 15-month period by three surgeons were included. All patients had their preoperative medications continued to the day of surgery and prophylactic anti-arrhythmic medications were not used in any of the cases. Standard anaesthetic techniques were used. Rhythm disturbances were diagnosed by ECG. The arrhythmias were treated medically or by cardioversion. All patients were followed up for 6 months.

RESULTS

Postoperative SVA occurred in 25% of patients. The commonest arrhythmia was atrial fibrillation (89.4%), followed by atrial flutter (6.4%) and supraventricular tachycardia (4.2%). In 89. 8% of the cases, the arrhythmias occurred within the first four postoperative days with a maximum incidence on the second day (27. 7%). Atrial fibrillation was still present in 50% of patients at hospital discharge and in 39% at 6 months follow up. Patients with arrhythmias had a prolonged hospital stay (7.7+/-2.6 vs. 6.0+/-2.6 days; P<0.05). There was no hospital mortality in the study and the incidence of postoperative stroke was equal in the sinus rhythm and arrhythmia patients (1.1%). SVA were more frequent when cardioplegia was used to protect the heart (32%) than with intermittent ischaemia (9%; P<0.001). At 6 months follow up, the patients receiving cardioplegia also had a higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation than those operated with intermittent ischaemia (41% vs. 22%; P<0. 05). The incidence of SVA and persistence of atrial fibrillation was unrelated to other preoperative and intraoperative factors.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative supraventricular arrhythmias have a long-lasting effect on cardiac rhythm: patients with SVA have a high probability of remaining in atrial fibrillation at hospital discharge and 6 months after surgery. The occurrence of atrial fibrillation seems to be influenced by the type of myocardial protection used but this does not appear to exert harmful effects.

Ineffectiveness and potential proarrhythmia of atrial pacing for atrial fibrillation prevention after coronary artery bypass grafting

BACKGROUND

Atrial pacing is often used empirically to suppress atrial ectopy and prevent atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting.

METHODS

To determine whether atrial overdrive pacing reduces atrial fibrillation and atrial ectopy after coronary artery bypass grafting, 100 patients were randomized to no atrial pacing (Control) versus AAI pacing at 10 beats/min or more above the resting heart rate (Paced), started by postoperative day 1 and continued through day 4. Major end points were new atrial fibrillation and frequency of atrial ectopy during the first 4 days after coronary artery bypass grafting.

RESULTS

Atrial fibrillation occurred by day 4 in 13 of 51 (25.5%) Paced and in 14 of 49 (28.6%) Control patients, p = 0.90. Control patients who developed atrial fibrillation had significantly more atrial ectopy than those who did not. Atrial ectopy was paradoxically more frequent in the Paced group (2,106+/-428 versus 866+/-385 per 24 hours, p = 0.0001). Loss of capture, sensing, and consistent atrial pacing occurred frequently during atrial pacing.

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to prevailing opinion and practice, postoperative atrial overdrive pacing significantly increases atrial ectopy and does not reduce the likelihood of atrial fibrillation.

Polypharmacy in a general surgical unit and consequences of drug withdrawal

AIMS

To identify drug usage/withdrawal in surgical patients and the relative risk this imposes on postoperative surgical complications.

METHODS

A prospective survey of patients' medicines, oral intake (food/fluids/ medicines) and postoperative complications was carried out in the General Surgical Unit, Dunedin Hospital, Dunedin, New Zealand.

RESULTS

One thousand and twenty-five general surgical patients aged >/= 16 years, were entered into the study. Half of the patients were taking medicines unrelated to surgery. On average these patients received 9 different drugs (range 1-47) from a selection of 251, of which 21% were released in the last 10 years. The mean number of these drugs taken increased with age, vascular surgery and other major procedures. The majority of patients (53%) were taking drugs for cardiovascular problems. Only 8% of admissions were on the drugs more traditionally recognized to be of importance to the surgery, i.e. steroids and diabetic therapy. With respect to risk, taking a drug unrelated to surgery was associated with an increased relative risk of a postoperative complication by 2.7 (95% C.I. 1.76-4.04) compared with those who were not taking any drug. Cardiovascular drugs contributed significantly to this risk; when they were excluded from analysis, the risk dropped to 1.8 (95% C.I. 1.14-2.93). Death may be more common in those taking ACE inhibitors. Drug withdrawal and complications were analysed and as the time without medicines increased (range 1-42 days) so did the complication rate (chi2 = 14.7, DF = 2, P = 0.007). Of those patients who were taking a cardiovascular medicine and were without their normal medicines for a period of time postoperatively, 12% suffered a cardiac complication.

CONCLUSIONS

Many patients admitted to a general surgical ward, are taking medicines unrelated to surgery. Drug therapy unrelated to surgery is a useful predictor for increased postoperative complications and one for which preventive action can be taken. This study provides evidence that withdrawal of regular medicines may add significant risk to the surgery and further complicate outcome. The longer patients were without their regular medicines the more nonsurgical complications they suffered. Reintroduction of patients' regular medicines early in their postoperative course may decrease morbidity and mortality in-patients.

Effect of posterior pericardiotomy on postoperative supraventricular arrhythmias and late pericardial effusion (posterior pericardiotomy)

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the effectiveness of posterior pericardiotomy from the point of pericardial effusion related with supraventricular tachycardia and development of delayed posterior cardiac effusions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective randomized study was carried out in 200 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery in Gülhane Medical Academy Department of Cardiovascular Surgery between June 1996 and June 1997. Patients were divided into 2 groups; each group included 100 patients. Longitudinal incision was made parallel and posterior to the left phrenic nerve, extending from the left inferior pulmonary vein to the diaphragm in group I patients. Posterior pericardiotomy was not done in group II.

RESULTS

Atrial fibrillation was developed in 6 patients (6%) in group I and in 34 patients (34%) in group II (P =.0000007). Atrial flutter and other supraventricular arrhythmia prevalence was not statistically significant. Early and late pericardial effusion were developed 54% and 21%, respectively, in group II, but neither early nor late pericardial effusion were developed in group I (P =.00001). Delayed pericardial tamponade was also significantly lower in group I (0% vs 10%; P =.001).

CONCLUSION

Posterior pericardiotomy is technically easy to perform and a safe and effective technique that reduces not only the prevalence of early pericardial effusion and related atrial fibrillation but also delayed posterior pericardial effusion and tamponade.

Is atrial fibrillation caused by extracorporeal circulation?

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation is the most common rhythm disturbance encountered after open heart operations, with a reported incidence up to 40%. Despite its high incidence and clinical relevance its etiology remains obscure. It has been hypothesized that atrial fibrillation might be related to extracorporeal circulation. We performed a retrospective study (January 1, 1997 to December 31, 1997) comparing the incidence of atrial fibrillation in 3 groups of patients revascularized with and without extracorporeal circulation.

METHODS

The first group comprised patients with coronary artery disease operated on with standard revascularization technique with cardiopulmonary bypass (n = 685). The second group included patients who had minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting without the use of extracorporeal circulation (n = 19). Patients in the third group had off-pump transmyocardial laser revascularization (n = 19).

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the incidence of atrial fibrillation in the group that had conventional coronary artery bypass and the group that had minimally invasive coronary artery bypass without cardiopulmonary bypass. The incidence of atrial fibrillation was significantly lower in the transmyocardial laser group compared with the other two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study found that postoperative atrial fibrillation is not caused solely by extracorporeal circulation, but patients who had transmyocardial laser revascularization had a significantly lower incidence of atrial fibrillation.

Rhythm management in atrial fibrillation--with a primary emphasis on pharmacologic therapy: Part 3

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common, sustained, symptomatic tachyarrhythmia that clinicians are called upon to manage. Management strategies include ventricular rate control coupled with anticoagulation, versus restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm. Rate control may be achieved pharmacologically, with agents that impair AV nodal conduction directly and/or by increasing parasympathetic/sympathetic balance, or by modifying or ablating the AV nodal region anatomically. Rhythm control may be achieved by electrical or pharmacologic conversion followed by maintenance of sinus rhythm by pharmacologic (or occasionally ablative) therapies. This article will present current approaches to rate and rhythm control issues in atrial fibrillation. Parts 1 and 2, published previously, dealt with rate control and with the restoration of sinus rhythm. Part 3, the current article, details the selection process of choosing a therapy to maintain sinus rhythm, including the likelihood of success, the risks of therapy, and individualization of therapy as dependent upon the nature of the structural heart disease present. It also discusses nonpharmacologic approaches that have been recently developed or are undergoing development. One suggested drug selection algorithm is provided.

Value of the signal-averaged P wave analysis in predicting atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia occurring after cardiac surgery. Beside important implications regarding patient recovery, AF has been shown to substantially lengthen hospital stay--our recent study found a 3-day prolongation after adjusting for all other significant factors. Identification of those at highest risk of AF by clinical or noninvasive characteristics may be a useful strategy for targeted prophylactic therapy. Our data have shown that prolonged atrial conduction as assessed by analysis of the P wave duration from the signal-averaged electrocardiogram (SAECG) imparts a four fold increase in risk for postoperative AF, independently of other measured variables. In addition, abnormal conduction was present on the preoperative P wave ECG (P-SAECG), implying a preexisting substrate that is triggered by surgery. The use of combination abnormal noninvasive variables (eg, abnormal P-SAECG and low left ventricular ejection fraction) can identify groups with a 50% risk of AF, which is nine times as high as when both tests are normal. Thus, the P-SAECG is a useful and accurate predictor of AF after cardiac surgery.

Comparison of sotalol and metoprolol in the prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery

New-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) is frequent after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), and beta-blockers decrease its incidence. To examine whether a beta-blocker with class III properties is superior to a pure one, 191 consecutive patients undergoing CABG were randomized to receive oral sotalol, 120 mg daily (n = 93), or metoprolol, 75 mg daily (n = 98), postoperatively. The doses were adjusted if beta-blockade was inadequate or excessive. AF occurred in 16 (16%) of 98 sotalol patients and in 30 (32%) of 93 metoprolol patients (p < 0.01). Symptoms related to beta-blockade or proarrhythmia did not appear. After CABG, sinus heart rate increased in both groups (p < 0.001) but less in the sotalol patients (p < 0.001) throughout the postoperative period. Corrected QT duration (by the Bazett equation) was prolonged after the operation in both groups (p < 0.001), whereas uncorrected QT duration at similar heart-rate levels were prolonged only in sotalol patients (mean increase, 31 ms; 95% confidence interval, 2042 ms; p < 0.01). Uncorrected QT durations at similar heart-rate levels were longer during sotalol (compared with metoprolol) treatment (p < 0.05). Heart rates or QT durations did not differ between the patients with or without AF. In conclusion, sotalol significantly reduces the incidence of AF after CABG. Although a marked class III effect is demonstrated with relatively low doses (as prolonged ventricular repolarization) in direct comparison unbiased by any rate correction, its contribution as an enhanced antifibrillatory mechanism in the postoperative state remains unconfirmed.

The medical management of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation is an extremely common arrhythmia that is associated with significant sequelae. Certain aspects of therapy, such as anticoagulation, are studied in well-constructed randomized trials. Other therapy, such as the maintenance of sinus rhythm with antiarrhythmic agents, is supported by limited evidence. This article reviews the epidemiology and medical treatment of this arrhythmia, addressing anticoagulation, ventricular rate control, and restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm. Randomized trials in progress that attempt to answer important questions in the management of atrial fibrillation are also discussed.

Long-term prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: comparison of quinidine, verapamil, and amiodarone in maintaining sinus rhythm

AIM OF STUDY

To evaluate the necessity and efficacy of quinidine fumarate, verapimil, or amiodarone prophylaxis for sinus rhythm maintenance in patients who experienced atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery.

METHODS

Between 1992 and 1995, this prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study examined 120 patients in whom atrial fibrillation occurred and was restored to sinus rhythm by pharmacological therapy or direct current cardioversion in the immediately postoperative period after coronary artery by-pass surgery. There were no significant differences in perioperative characteristics among the patients, who were randomly separated into four groups in the course of discharge. In group 1 (n = 30), patients did not receive antiarrhythmic drugs. Quinidine fumarate was given in group 2 (n = 30), verapimil in group 3 (n = 30), and amiodarone in group 4 (n = 30). Patients were monitored six times over a 90-day postoperative period by 24-hour Holter monitoring and routine examination.

RESULTS

The recurrent atrial fibrillation usually developed within 15 days of discharge. Atrial fibrillation occurred in one patient (3.33%) in group 1, and two each (6.66%) in groups 2, 3, and 4. Atrial fibrillation was asymptomatic and occurred with slow ventricular response in groups 3 and 4. Side effects occurred in 5 patients (16.6%) given quinidine, 1 patient given amiodarone, but in no patient given verapimil.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no significant differences in the maintenance of sinus rhythm among the four groups, so we suggest that long-term prevention of atrial fibrillation in patients with coronary artery bypass grafting was not necessary at the postdischarge period.

Atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting is associated with sympathetic activation

BACKGROUND

We prospectively investigated the role of sympathetic activation in the etiology of atrial fibrillation following coronary artery bypass grafting.

METHODS

Continuous ambulatory monitoring was performed for 80 hours in 131 patients after coronary artery bypass grafting. Right atrial plasma norepinephrine levels were assessed preoperatively and every 4 hours for 48 hours postoperatively.

RESULTS

Of the 131 patients, 50% (65) had development of atrial fibrillation and 36% (47) required treatment. Onset of atrial fibrillation was preceded by a significant increase in sinus rate and atrial ectopic activity. On multivariate logistic regression, elevated mean postoperative norepinephrine levels (5.78 +/- 2.83 versus 3.57 +/- 1.31 nmol/L; p < 0.0001), increased age (68.9 +/- 5.7 versus 63.8 +/- 8.7 years; p = 0.02), and decreased postoperative magnesium levels (0.79 +/- 0.09 versus 0.83 +/- 0.10 mmol/L; p = 0.02) were independently associated with the occurrence of atrial fibrillation.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated norepinephrine levels suggest that sympathetic activation may be important in the pathogenesis of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting, and this underlines the importance of beta-adrenoceptor blockade as prophylaxis.

Use of P-wave-triggered, P-wave signal-averaged electrocardiogram to predict atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery

Atrial fibrillation occurs commonly after coronary artery bypass surgery. However, despite numerous attempts at prediction, no accurate and generally accepted method exists to predict its occurrence. P-wave-triggered P-wave signal averaging was performed on 54 patients before coronary artery bypass surgery to evaluate the utility of this method to predict atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery. After excluding six patients with unevaluable P-wave signal averages and three patients with postoperative arrhythmias other than atrial fibrillation, the P-wave signal averages of 45 patients were analyzed. Sixteen patients had postoperative atrial fibrillation and 29 did not. The mean P-wave duration of the filtered, signal-averaged P wave was 163 +/- 19 msec in the 16 patients with atrial fibrillation and 144 +/- 16 msec in the 29 patients without (p < 0.005). Left atrial enlargement on the surface electrocardiogram (ECG) was the only other statistically significant variable that correlated weakly with the onset of postoperative atrial fibrillation (p = 0.04). Other clinical variables such as P-wave duration in ECG lead II, left ventricular hypertrophy on ECG, age, sex, hypertension, and left ventricular ejection fraction were not significantly different between the two groups. With a cut point of 155 msec, chi-squared analysis revealed a p value of < 0.005, yielding a sensitivity of 69%, a specificity of 79%, a positive predictive value of 65%, and a negative predictive value of 82%. Signal-averaging of the P wave in patients before coronary artery bypass surgery provides a good predictor of postoperative atrial fibrillation.

Arrhythmias and conduction disturbances after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: epidemiology, management, and prognosis

CABG is associated with many perioperative complications, including supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias and conduction disturbances. Atrial fibrillation occurs in < or = 40% of patients after CABG and is especially common in older patients. Although it is often benign and self-limited, it can lead to complications such as stroke. Treatment consists primarily of control of the ventricular response rate; in some cases, antiarrhythmic drugs or electrical cardioversion are needed. Anticoagulation should be considered in appropriate cases of persistent (48 to 72 hours) atrial fibrillation after initial treatment. Prophylaxis, especially with beta-blocking agents, seems to be effective and should be considered in appropriate cases. Simple ventricular arrhythmias are common after CABG and do not affect the patient's prognosis; however, sustained VT/VF occur infrequently (< 2% of patients) and carry a high mortality rate. Treatment is aimed at correcting precipitating factors (e.g., myocardial ischemia). Electrophysiologically guided drug therapy and implantation of an ICD should be considered in appropriate cases for patients who survive the initial events. Transient minor conduction disturbances are common after CABG; in some patients persistent AV block and sinus node dysfunction develop and may require treatment with permanent pacemaker.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Between June 1991 and June 1993, 651 patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting: 37 patients (group I) had significant chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. These patients were compared with 37 matched control subjects (group II). Comparison of the groups was made with regard to postoperative morbidity and mortality. Quality of life of survivors was compared at the last follow-up. More patients in group I had preoperative arrhythmias (8 versus 1, p = 0.014). Group I patients had lower values of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (1.366 +/- 0.032 L versus 2.335 +/- 0.49 L, p < 0.0001), lower oxygen tension (63.5 +/- 8.2 versus 79.1 +/- 13.4 mm Hg, p = 0.001), and higher carbon dioxide tension (44.8 +/- 6.5 mm Hg versus 39.7 +/- 3.6 mm Hg, p = 0.001). After operation patients in group I had a longer hospital stay (8.1 +/- 3.6 days versus 6.6 +/- 1.7 days, p = 0.0236) and longer intensive care unit stay (2.64 +/- 0.9 days versus 1.23 +/- 0.49 days, p = 0.0001). More patients in group I required prolonged intubation (7 versus 1, p = 0.0278) and reintubation (5 versus 1, p = 0.088). More patients in group I had significant arrhythmias (27 versus 9, p < 0.0001). During a 16-month follow-up period, five patients in group I died, whereas none in group II died (p = 0.0271). Four deaths were related to arrhythmias. More group I patients were not functionally improved by the operation (17 versus 3, p = 0.0056). The results of coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with significant chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were not favorable in midterm follow-up. A major cause for morbidity and mortality was postoperative arrhythmias.

Hemodynamic effects and safety of sotalol in the prevention of supraventricular arrhythmias after coronary artery bypass surgery

Sotalol is a beta-adrenergic blocking drug with the additional property of lengthening the cardiac action potential. These electrophysiologic properties render the drug attractive for use in the prevention of postoperative supraventricular arrhythmias (SVA), and previous studies have suggested that it was indeed effective. The hemodynamic response to sotalol and its safety early after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery were therefore studied. Forty-two patients undergoing CABG were randomly assigned either to receive sotalol to prevent postoperative SVA (25 patients) or to serve as controls (17 patients). Sotalol was started 6 hours after surgery if patients had a cardiac index > 2.8 L/min/m2 with a pulmonary capillary wedge pressure < 15 mmHg, and if they had no contraindications to the use of beta-blockers. The drug was given as a loading infusion of 1 mg/kg over 2 hours, followed by a maintenance infusion of 0.15 mg/kg/h for 24 hours. Three hours later, patients received the first oral dose of 80 mg to be repeated every 8 or 12 hours. Adverse effects necessitating discontinuation of the drug (bradycardia < 50 beats/min, systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg, or cardiac index < 2.2 L/min/m2) occurred in six patients (24%) and were mainly related to the loading infusion. The hemodynamic data for patients who completed the study were characterized by a significant fall of the cardiac index caused by a lower heart rate without significant change of the stroke volume index. The incidence of supraventricular arrhythmias was not significantly different in the two groups (3/19 in the sotalol group, 5/17 in the control group).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effectiveness of sotalol in preventing supraventricular tachyarrhythmias shortly after coronary artery bypass grafting

To investigate the effectiveness and safety of low-dose sotalol (a class III antiarrhythmic beta-blocking agent) in the prevention of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias (SVTs) and to identify predictors for the occurrence of these arrhythmias shortly after coronary artery bypass grafting, 300 consecutive patients were randomized in a double-blind, placebo-controlled fashion. Patients with severely depressed left ventricular function or other contraindications for beta blockers were excluded. Beginning at 4 hours and up to the sixth day after surgery, 150 patients received 40 mg of sotalol every 6 hours. SVT was observed in 24 (16%) of 150 low-dose sotalol-and in 49 (33%) of 150 placebo-treated patients [p less than 0.005]. In patients receiving sotalol, atrial fibrillation was the only noted tachyarrhythmia, whereas in the placebo group, 42 (28%) patients had atrial fibrillation, 3 (2%) atrial flutter, 1 (0.7%) atrial tachycardia and 3 (2%) sinus tachycardia. Drug-related adverse effects necessitating discontinuation of the drug were noted in only 2 (1%) sotalol-treated patients and 4 (3%) placebo-treated patients (p = not significant). For both groups, univariate analysis indicated that older age, 1- or 2-vessel coronary artery disease, long bypass (greater than or equal to 150 minutes) and aorta cross-clamp time (greater than or equal to 120 minutes) were predictive variables for the occurrence of SVTs. Multivariate analysis showed that male sex (odds ratio 2.3), 1- or 2-vessel coronary artery disease (odds ratio 2.0) and older age (odds ratio 1.1) were independent risk factors for increased occurrence of postoperative SVT.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Esmolol: safety and efficacy in postoperative cardiothoracic patients with supraventricular tachyarrhythmias

Esmolol, an intravenous, ultrashort-acting beta-blocker, was studied for its ability to safely control supraventricular arrhythmias up to 24 hours in 15 postoperative cardiothoracic surgery patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter and rapid ventricular response. Esmolol obtained an initial therapeutic response in nine (60 percent) patients. Mean heart rate for the 15 patients was reduced from 139 +/- 12 beats/min before therapy to 106 +/- 21 beats/min during esmolol infusion (p less than 0.01). The mean time to a therapeutic response after initiation of therapy, using a multistep titration regimen (500 micrograms/kg/min loading infusions over one minute, prior to incremental titration steps from 50 to 300 micrograms/kg/min over 4 to 14 minutes), was 22 +/- 9 minutes, and therapy was continued for 17 +/- 9 hours in responders. Esmolol significantly lowered blood pressure in the group studied and resulted in mild supine or orthostatic hypotension in ten (67 percent) patients. Side effects, including hypotension (10/15 patients), gastrointestinal disturbances (2/15), and weakness or somnolence (6/15), were transient and were not associated with serious clinical sequelae. We conclude that esmolol is effective for rate control in a majority of postoperative cardiothoracic surgery patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter. Side effects, although mild, occur relatively frequently, limiting prolonged infusions and warranting close surveillance of patients.

Esmolol: a titratable short-acting intravenous beta blocker for acute critical care settings

Esmolol (Brevibloc) is an intravenous, short-acting, titratable, cardioselective beta blocker with a very rapid onset and offset of action (t1/2 = 9.2 minutes). Esmolol-induced beta blockade can be maintained as long as infusion is continued. It exhibits neither intrinsic sympathomimetic activity nor significant membrane-stabilizing activity. It is rapidly metabolized by an esterase in the erythrocyte cytosol to an inactive acid metabolite. Its hemodynamic and electrophysiologic effects are similar to those of other beta blockers. Unlike the effects of other beta blockers, however, the effects of esmolol dissipate rapidly to baseline within 30 minutes after its discontinuation. Evidence obtained from clinical studies indicates that esmolol is effective and safe in reducing the ventricular rate in patients with supraventricular tachyarrhythmias, and in reducing the heart rate in patients with acute myocardial infarction and/or unstable angina. Esmolol has also been shown to be effective and safe in attenuating the tachycardia and hypertension seen during the intraoperative period. Data from postoperative patients indicate that esmolol is ideal as sole-agent therapy for the treatment of moderate postoperative hypertension associated with a hyperdynamic state. The short duration of action and titratability of esmolol make it an ideal drug for use in patients in whom the clinical need for beta blockade is limited in duration, and it offers additional safety in patients in whom beta blockade is beneficial; however, it might be precluded because of coexisting contraindications. To date, experience with esmolol in over 1200 patients has been gathered, and the adverse effect profile is basically similar to that reported here.

Efficacy of nadolol in preventing supraventricular tachycardia after coronary artery bypass grafting

To investigate the efficacy of nadolol in the prevention of supraventricular arrhythmias after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, 148 patients undergoing elective CABG were randomized in double-blind, placebo-controlled fashion to receive either nadolol or placebo. The test medication was started on the first postoperative morning and maintained as a single daily dose for 6 weeks. Aside from routine daily clinical evaluation and postoperative electrocardiographic monitoring, patients underwent 24-hour Holter recording once preoperatively and 3 times postoperatively. Seven patients were excluded from the evaluation of efficacy analysis because of insufficient postoperative data. There were no significant differences between the patients receiving nadolol (n = 67) and those receiving placebo (n = 74) with respect to age, preoperative heart rate, previous medications (including beta blockers), incidence of previous myocardial infarction, frequency of preoperative ventricular and supraventricular arrhythmias, concomitant valvular heart disease, mean cardiopulmonary bypass time, mean aortic cross-clamp time, use of blood and crystalloid cardioplegia, mean number of bypass grafts placed, postoperative use of inotropic agents and catecholamines and incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction. Analysis of postoperative Holter recordings showed that the heart rate was consistently and significantly higher in the placebo group throughout the period of the study (p less than 0.001). The average number of premature atrial contractions was significantly smaller in the nadolol group (p less than 0.05), and nadolol patients had fewer ventricular premature complexes, couplets and non-sustained ventricular tachycardias during the first week postoperatively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Beta-adrenergic blocker withdrawal

Abrupt withdrawal of long-term beta-blocker therapy in patients with angina may be associated with unstable angina and myocardial infarction. It appears that an "overshoot" in heart rate from pretreatment values occurs, which increases myocardial oxygen demand. This increase in heart rate may be secondary to increased beta receptor numbers or increased receptor sensitivity. Another possible mechanism for the increased risk of myocardial infarction after beta-blocker withdrawal is increased platelet aggregability. Withdrawal reactions may be less severe with beta blockers that have partial agonist activity. In patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery, beta-blocker withdrawal reactions have also been observed. Maintenance of beta-blocker therapy on the morning of surgery appears to reduce this risk. Gradual withdrawal regimens in outpatients with angina may be associated with lower risk for a beta-blocker withdrawal reaction. The gradual withdrawal of beta blockers in hypertensive patients requires further study.

Incidence and prevention of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias after coronary bypass surgery

Supraventricular tachyarrhythmias are a frequent complication encountered after coronary artery bypass grafting. A retrospective survey of 102 consecutive patients undergoing exclusive bypass grafting at St. Mary's Hospital supplemented by a review of 16 published reports over a period of 10 years revealed a mean incidence of post-operative tachyarrhythmia of 33.4% in 1344 patients (range 11.4-100%). One hundred and thirty two patients undergoing exclusive bypass surgery, were randomised prospectively in double blind fashion to receive either oral timolol or matched placebo approximately 24 hours after surgery. In the 66 patients receiving timolol, there was a significant reduction of post-operative arrhythmias compared to the 66 patients receiving placebo: from 19.7 to 7.5% (P less than 0.05). Of all arrhythmias, two thirds appeared under 48 hours after surgery. In the timolol group, 4 patients developed systemic hypotension. This was readily reversed by withdrawing the drug. No other side effects were noted. The use of oral timolol after coronary artery surgery significantly lowers the incidence of post-operative supraventricular arrhythmias.