Biomechanical comparisons of four-strand tendon repairs with double-stranded sutures: effects of different locks and suture geometry

Biomechanical Evaluation of a Tubular Braided Construct for Primary Deep Flexor Tendon Surgery

PURPOSE

Immediate postoperative mobilization has been shown to avoid adhesion formation and improve range of motion after flexor tendon repair. A tubular braided construct was designed to allow for these rehabilitation protocols.

METHODS

In this ex vivo study, 92 ovine flexor tendons were divided randomly into 2 equal groups. After creating a transection, the tendons of the first group were repaired using a tubular braided construct. This construct, consisting of a tubular braid of polypropylene and polyethylene terephthalate fibers, exerts a grasping effect on the tendon ends. The control group received a multistrand modified Kessler repair with a looped polydioxanone suture (PDS) 4-0 suture and a Silfverskiöld epitendinous repair using an Ethilon 6-0 suture. After the repair, a static and an incremental cyclic tensile test was performed until failure.

RESULTS

During the static test, the tubular braid resulted in a significantly higher load at 3 mm gap formation (86.3 N ± 6.0 vs 50.1 N ± 11.6), a higher ultimate load at failure (98.3 N ± 12.7 vs 63 N ± 11.1), higher stress at ultimate load (11.8 MPa ± 1.2 vs 8.1 MPa ± 3.1), and higher stiffness (7.1 N/mm ± 2.9 vs 8.7 N/mm ± 2.2). For the cyclic tests, survival analyses for 1-, 2- and 3-mm gap formation and failure demonstrated significant differences in favor of the tubular braided construct.

CONCLUSION

The tubular braided construct withstands the required loads for immediate rehabilitation not only in static tests, but also during cyclic tests. This is in contrast with the control group, where sufficient strength is reached during static tests, but failures occur below the required loads during cyclic testing.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The tubular braided construct provides a larger safety margin for immediate intensive rehabilitation protocols.

Practice Patterns in Operative Flexor Tendon Laceration Repair: A 15-Year Analysis of Continuous Certification Data from the American Board of Plastic Surgery

The American Board of Plastic Surgery has been collecting practice data on operative repair of flexor tendon lacerations since 2006, as part of its Continuous Certification program.

Comparison of 4 Different 4-Strand Core Suturing Techniques for Flexor Tendon Laceration: An Ex Vivo Biomechanical Study

BACKGROUND

Forces applied to the repaired flexor tendon should not exceed its yield force during early postoperative rehabilitation to prevent gapping and rupture. We aimed to biomechanically compare the tensile strengths and the 2-mm gapping of 4 different 4-strand core suturing techniques for flexor tendon repair.

METHODS

Fifty-six goat deep digital flexor tendons were repaired with the 4-strand double-modified Kessler, the 4-strand augmented Becker, the 4-strand Savage, and the 4-strand modified Tang techniques. All tendons were repaired with 4-0 polyester for core suture and 5-0 polyester for continuous epitendinous running suture. The specimens were subjected to static linear tensile testing by applying a single linear load-to-failure pull. After the linear load testing, the yield load, the ultimate strength of the repaired tendons, and the force exerted to yield a 2-mm gap were measured.

RESULTS

All peripheral sutures ruptured near the yield point. All core suture techniques were similar regarding the yield force. The augmented Becker 4-strand technique had the greatest ultimate strength (98.7 [82-125.3] N). The modified double Kessler technique was the weakest in resisting a 2-mm gap formation. The 4-strand modified Tang repair had the shortest (11.3 [7-15] minutes), while the 4-strand augmented Becker had the longest operative time (29 [23-33] minutes).

CONCLUSIONS

All 4 techniques demonstrated similar yield force, with differences in operative time, ultimate strength, and resistance to gapping. Future clinical studies can further elucidate their appropriateness for early active motion protocols.

Helical 6-Strand Cruciate Tenorrhaphy: Description of a New Technique and Biomechanical Comparative Analysis With 2 Standard Techniques

Background: Multiple flexor tendon repair techniques have been developed over the last years. Despite all this, there is no standard technique that has proven to be superior to others, leading to great variability in the use of techniques in surgical practice. We describe a novel tendon repair technique and compare its biomechanical characteristics with 2 conventional techniques. Methods: Comparative experimental biomechanical study in ex vivo animal models. In all, 66 deep flexor tendons of the pig's front legs were taken and it's repair was performed by 1 of 3 techniques (helical 6-strand cruciate tendon repair, Adelaide tendon repair, or modified Kessler). These repairs were subjected to biomechanical study, measuring, and registering the ultimate tensile strength, load to 2-mm gap force, and stiffness. Results: The helical 6-strand cruciate tenorrhaphy compared with the Adelaide and modified Kessler techniques carries statistically significant greater ultimate tensile strength before failure (65.5, 46, and 36 N, respectively, P < .001). It also required a greater load to 2-mm gap force and is less stiff, allowing greater strain before failure. This technique does not generate significant changes in the dimensions of the tendons compared to the others, and there was no significant difference in the strength of repair between surgeons. Conclusions: The helical 6-strand cruciate tenorrhaphy is a novel technique, useful for the repair of flexor tendons in the hand that holds up the necessary forces to initiate early mobilization in the postoperative period and has better biomechanical properties than 2 standard techniques.

Biomechanical study of a newly developed continuous double knots technique compared with the 4-strand double-modified Kessler technique for flexor tendon repair

PURPOSE

In this study we compare the biomechanical properties of a novel suture technique that we developed called the continuous double knots technique for repairing flexor tendon injuries with the standard 4-strand double-modified Kessler technique.

METHODS

This was an experimental study. Eighty porcine flexor digitorum profundus tendons were harvested and divided randomly into two groups of 40. The first group (N = 40) was repaired using the 4-strand double modified Kessler technique and the second group (N = 40) was repaired using our new continuous double knots technique. The two groups were randomly divided and the ultimate failure load (n = 20) and cyclic testing to failure (n = 20) were compared.

RESULTS

The mean ultimate failure load was 25.90 ± 7.11 (N) and cyclic testing to failure 88 ± 47.87 (cycles) for the 4-strand double modified Kessler technique and 34.56 ± 6.60 (N) and 189 ± 66.36 (cycles) for our new continuous double knots technique. The T-test revealed a significant difference between the 2 techniques (p < 0.05). In terms of biomechanical properties in tendon repair, the continuous double knots technique group had a higher tensile strength than the 4-strand double-modified Kessler technique group. There were also significant differences between the ultimate failure load and cyclic testing to failure for the flexor tendon sutures.

CONCLUSIONS

The continuous double knots technique suture technique had significantly higher maximum tensile strength and cyclic testing than the 4-strand double modified Kessler technique in an in vitro study, and in thus an optional technique for flexor tendon repair.

Basic Research on Tendon Repair: Strategies, Evaluation, and Development

Tendon is a fibro-elastic structure that links muscle and bone. Tendon injury can be divided into two types, chronic and acute. Each type of injury or degeneration can cause substantial pain and the loss of tendon function. The natural healing process of tendon injury is complex. According to the anatomical position of tendon tissue, the clinical results are different. The wound healing process includes three overlapping stages: wound healing, proliferation and tissue remodeling. Besides, the healing tendon also faces a high re-tear rate. Faced with the above difficulties, management of tendon injuries remains a clinical problem and needs to be solved urgently. In recent years, there are many new directions and advances in tendon healing. This review introduces tendon injury and sums up the development of tendon healing in recent years, including gene therapy, stem cell therapy, Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy, growth factor and drug therapy and tissue engineering. Although most of these therapies have not yet developed to mature clinical application stage, with the repeated verification by researchers and continuous optimization of curative effect, that day will not be too far away.

Beyond the Core Suture: A New Approach to Tendon Repair

Despite significant improvements in zone II flexor tendon repair over the last 2 decades, function-limiting complications persist. This article describes 2 novel repair techniques utilizing flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) autografts to buttress the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) repair site without the use of core sutures. The hypothesis being that the reclaimed FDS tendon autograft will redistribute tensile forces away from the FDP repair site, increasing overall strength and resistance to gapping in Zone II flexor tendon injuries compared with the current clinical techniques.

Methods

Two novel FDP repair methods utilizing portions of FDS have been described: (1) asymmetric repair (AR), and (2) circumferential repair. Ultimate tensile strength and cyclical testing were used to compare novel techniques to current clinical standard repairs: 2-strand (2-St), 4-strand (4-St), and 6-strand (6-St) methods. All repairs were performed in cadaveric sheep tendons (n = 10/group), by a single surgeon.

Results

AR and circumferential repair techniques demonstrated comparable ultimate tensile strength to 6-St repairs, with all 3 of these techniques able to tolerate significantly stronger loads than the 2-St and 4-St repairs (P < 0.0001). Cyclical testing demonstrated that AR and circumferential repair were able to withstand a significantly higher total cumulative force (P < 0.001 and P = 0.0064, respectively) than the 6-St, while only AR tolerated a significantly greater force to 2-mm gap formation (P = 0.042) than the 6-St repair.

Conclusion

Incorporating FDS as an autologous graft for FDP repair provides at least a comparable ultimate tensile strength and a significantly greater cumulative force to failure and 2-mm gap formation than a traditional 6-St repair.

Flexor tendon injuries

Flexor tendon injuries have constituted a large portion of the literature in hand surgery over many years. Yet many controversies remain and the techniques of surgery and therapy are still evolving. The anatomical and finer technical considerations involved in treating these injuries have been put forth and discussed in detail including the rehabilitation following the flexor tendon repair. The authors consider, recognition and mastery of these facts form the foundation for a successful flexor tendon repair. The trend is now towards multiple strand core sutures followed by early active mobilization. However, the rehabilitation process appears to be one of the major determinant of the success following a flexor tendon repair. Early mobilization is essential for all the flexor tendon repairs as it is proved to improve the quality of the repaired tendon. The art of achieving the harmony between a stronger repair and unhindered gliding of the repair site through the narrow flexor tendon sheath simultaneously can be mastered with practice added to the knowledge of the basic principles.

Comparison of the strength of two multi-strand tendon repair configurations in a chicken model

We sought to investigate the strength of two multi-strand tendon repair configurations in a chicken model. Fifty-six chicken flexor tendons were repaired with one to two different four-strand configurations: 1) a four-strand repair consisting of a two-strand core modified Kessler suture with a circle loop repair and 2) a four-strand core Kessler suture repair with three separate peripheral suture points. The strength of the repaired tendons were measured 2, 3 and 4 weeks after the surgical repair and were analyzed statistically. The strength of the two repair methods was not statistically different 2 weeks after surgery. The tendons repaired with the four-strand core Kessler suture repair and three separate peripheral suture points were significantly stronger than those repaired with a two-strand core modified Kessler suture and a circle loop repair at 3 weeks (P = 0.033) and 4 weeks (P = 0.039). The four-strand repair with three separate peripheral suture points had greater strength than a two-strand repair with one circle loop suture based on an in vivo chicken flexor tendon model.

Biomechanical Comparison of a New Loop Suture Technique With Conventional Techniques of Flexor Tendon Repair: An In Vitro Study

INTRODUCTION

Flexor tendon repair techniques that can resist active forces are widely accepted. Despite that many suture techniques have been described, the "perfect repair" for flexor tendons cannot be achieved yet. We aimed to compare a new loop suture technique with commonly used flexor tendon repair methods biomechanically in hen tendon.

METHOD

We used 25 hen flexor tendons for each group (4-strand modified Kessler, grasping cruciate, Tsuge, and new technique groups). After the tendons were divided into 2, they were repaired according to these 4 techniques, were subjected to the initial stretching of 0.5 N, and pulled in the opposite directions. When a gap of 2 mm occurred, the test was terminated and the forces at that time were recorded. These strain forces were compared and evaluated statistically.

RESULTS

New technique had the best tensile strength results statistically. Modified Kessler and grasping cruciate took the second place and Tsuge repair gave the worst strain forces results.

CONCLUSIONS

With loop suture, 4 strands can be obtained with only 2 passes of the needle, and we think that much more tensile strength can be achieved because of the vertical transition and locking configurations of the new loop suture technique.

Biomechanical Analysis of the Modified Kessler, Lahey, Adelaide, and Becker Sutures for Flexor Tendon Repair

PURPOSE

To compare the biomechanical properties of the modified Kessler, Lahey, Adelaide, and Becker repairs, which are marked by either a locking-loop or a cross-lock configuration.

METHODS

Ninety-six lacerated porcine flexor tendons were repaired using the respective core suture and an epitendinous repair. Biomechanical testing was conducted under static and cyclic loads. Parameters of interest were 2-mm gap formation force, displacement during different loads, stiffness, maximum force, and mode of failure.

RESULTS

The meaningful gap formation occurred in all 4 repairs at similar tension loads without any significant differences. Maximum force was highest in the Becker repair with a considerable difference compared with the modified Kessler and Lahey sutures. The Adelaide repair showed the highest stiffness. Overall, the displacement during cyclic loading demonstrated similar results with an exception between the Lahey and the Adelaide repairs at 10 N load. Failure by suture pull-out occurred in 42% in the modified Kessler, in 38% in the Lahey, and in 4% in the Adelaide repairs. The Becker repair failed only by suture rupture.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our study suggest that the difference between the 4-strand repairs with a cross-lock or a locking-loop configuration is minor in regard to gap formation. A strong epitendinous suture and the application of core suture pretension might prevent differences in gapping. However, the modified Kessler and Lahey repairs had an inferior maximum tensile strength and were prone to early failure caused by the narrow locking loops with their limited locking power.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

We suggest that surgeons should use pre-tension in repaired tendons to improve gap resistance and should avoid narrow locking loop anchoring to the tendon.

Management of flexor tendon injuries - Part 2: current practice in Australia and guidelines for training young surgeons

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to gain a better understanding of current practice for the surgical management and rehabilitation of flexor tendon injuries in Australia, with the intent of establishing common guidelines for training of young surgeons.

METHODS

A survey was distributed to the membership of the Australian Hand Surgery Society to determine whether a consensus could be obtained for: suture material and gauge; core and epitenon suture techniques; sheath and pulley management; and post-operative protocols for primary flexor tendon repair.

RESULTS

The predominant materials used for core suture are Ticron™ Suture (Tyco Healthcare Group LP, Norwalk, Connecticut, USA) (34%) and Ethibond™ Polyester Suture (Ethicon, Somerville, New Jersey, USA) (24%). The two core suture configurations commonly used are the Adelaide (45%) and Kessler (32%) repair. The predominant materials used for epitendinous sutures are 6-0 Prolene™ Polypropylene Suture (Ethicon, Somerville, New Jersey, USA) (56%), 5-0 Prolene™ (21%) and 6-0 Ethilon™ Nylon Suture (Ethicon, Somerville, New Jersey, USA) (13%); and the majority (63%) use a running epitendinous technique. The management of critical pulleys is variable, with 89% prepared to perform some release of A2 and A4 pulleys. Rehabilitation protocols vary widely, with 24% of respondents using the same method for all patients, while 76% tailor their approach to each patient. Some component of active motion was used by most.

DISCUSSION

There exists some consensus on the management of flexor tendon injuries in Australia. However, the management of critical pulleys and methods of post-operative rehabilitation remain varied. For the training of young surgeons, a majority advise a 3-0 gauge braided polyester core suture of four strands, combined with a 6-0 Prolene™ simple running epitendinous suture for increased tendon repair strength and smooth glide. Trainees should attempt to retain the integrity of the A2 and A4 pulleys. Post-operative rehabilitation should include a component of active flexion.

Regulatory effects of introduction of an exogenous FGF2 gene on other growth factor genes in a healing tendon

In this study of a tendon injury model, we investigated how injection of a vector incorporating one growth factor gene changes expression levels of multiple growth factor genes in the healing process. The flexor tendon of chicken toes was completely cut and repaired surgically. The tendons in the experimental arm were injected with an adeno-associated virus-2 vector incorporating basic fibroblast growth-factor gene, whereas the tendons in the control arm were not injected or injected with sham vectors. Using real-time polymerase chain reaction, we found that, within the tendon healing period, a set of growth factor genes-transforming growth factor-β1, vascular endothelial growth factor, and connective tissue growth factor-were significantly up-regulated. Expression of the platelet-derived growth factor-B gene was not changed, and the insulin-like growth factor was down-regulated. A tendon marker gene, scleraxis, was significantly up-regulated in the period. Our study revealed an intriguing finding that introduction of one growth factor gene in the healing tendon modulated expression of multiple growth factor genes. We believe this study may have significant implications in determining the approach of gene therapy, and the findings substantiate that gene therapy using a single growth factor could affect multiple growth factors.

Evidence-based medicine: Flexor tendon repair

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After studying this article, the participant should be able to: (1) Describe and apply the current evidence-based treatment of acute flexor tendon injuries. (2) Compare and contrast the current postoperative therapy regimens following repair of flexor tendons. (3) Apply an evidence-based decision-making process for suture techniques of flexor tendon injuries.

SUMMARY

Flexor tendon repair remains a challenge for hand surgeons to reliably obtain excellent results. Surgical decisions should rely on the surgeon's experience, outcome studies, and direct evidence. This review is a compilation of the evidence from the literature on optimizing outcomes for flexor tendon repair.

Flexor tendon repair: a comparative study between a knotless barbed suture repair and a traditional four-strand monofilament suture repair

We compared the tensile strength of a novel knotless barbed suture method with a traditional four-strand Adelaide technique for flexor tendon repairs. Forty fresh porcine flexor tendons were transected and randomly assigned to one of the repair groups before repair. Biomechanical testing demonstrated that the tensile strengths between both tendon groups were very similar. However, less force was required to create a 2 mm gap in the four-strand repair method compared with the knotless barbed technique. There was a significant reduction in the cross-sectional area in the barbed suture group after repair compared with the Adelaide group. This would create better gliding within the pulley system in vivo and could decrease gapping and tendon rupture.

Performance of a knotless four-strand flexor tendon repair with a unidirectional barbed suture device: a dynamic ex vivo comparison

With increased numbers of reports using barbed sutures for tendon repairs we felt the need to design a specific tendon repair method to draw the best utility from these materials. We split 30 sheep deep flexor tendons in two groups of 15 tendons. One group was repaired with a new four-strand barbed suture repair method without knot. The other group was repaired with a conventional four-strand cross-locked cruciate repair method (Adelaide repair) with knot. Dynamic testing (3-30 N for 250 cycles) and additional static pull to failure was performed to investigate gap formation and final failure forces. The barbed suture repair group showed higher resistance to gap formation throughout the test. Additionally final failure force was higher for the barbed suture group compared with the conventional repair group. When used appropriately, barbed suture materials could be beneficial to use in tendon surgery, especially with regard to early loading of the repair site and gap formation.

Recent developments in flexor tendon repair techniques and factors influencing strength of the tendon repair

Over the last decade, both basic researchers and surgeons have sought to identify the most appropriate techniques to be applied in flexor tendon repairs. Recent developments in experimental tendon repairs and clinical outcomes of newer repair techniques have been reviewed in an attempt to comprehensively summarize the most critical mechanical factors affecting the performance of tendon repairs and the surgical factors influencing clinical outcomes. Among them, attention to annular pulleys, the purchase and tension of the core suture, and the direction and curvature of the path of tendon motion have been found to be determining factors in the results of tendon repair.

Biomechanical assessment of a novel tendon junction

The Pulvertaft weave has been the standard tendon junction technique used both in tendon transfers and tendon grafts. A limitation of this repair is the sequential failure of stabilizing sutures, rather than the tendon. A novel loop weave is described and compared with the Pulvertaft weave in biomechanical performance. Ovine deep flexor and extensor tendons were used to simulate Pulvertaft or loop weaves (n = 11) for tensile testing. The Pulvertaft weaves failed at the stabilizing sutures, whereas the loop weaves repairs failed by longitudinal splitting of the motor tendon. The loop weave demonstrated significantly higher mean initial failure and ultimate strengths. Tensile loads required to elongate the loop weave by 4, 6, and 8 mm were significantly higher, while more displacement was associated with the Pulvertaft repair under the application of 50, 75, and 100 N tensile loads. This study demonstrates favourable biomechanical characteristics of the new loop weave technique.

Current practice of primary flexor tendon repair: a global view

In this article, a group of international leaders in tendon surgery of the hand provide details of their current methods of primary flexor tendon repair. They are from recognized hand centers around the world, from which major contributions to the development of methods for flexor tendon repair have come over the past 2 decades. Changes made since the early 1990s regarding surgical methods and postoperative care for the flexor tendon repair are also discussed. Current practice methods used in the leading hand centers are summarized, and key points in providing the best possible clinical outcomes are outlined.

Current flexor and extensor tendon motion regimens: a summary

This article summarizes select multinational early motion protocols. Included are flexor and extensor protocols for digital tendon repair in many forms. Custom orthosis design, exercise regimens, and advanced techniques are examples of what to expect. The goal of the article is to expose the reader to new ideas, educate regarding advanced techniques in tendon rehabilitation, and stimulate independent study to further the reader's skill set.

Managing the injured tendon: current concepts

Despite advances in understanding of the mechanical aspects of tendon management with improved suture technique and early stress application with postoperative therapy, clinical results remain inconsistent after repair, especially within the synovial regions. Complementary research to enhance the intrinsic pathway of healing, suppress the extrinsic pathway of healing, and manipulate frictional resistance to tendon gliding is now the focus of current basic science research on tendons. In the future, application of these new biologic therapies may increase the "safety zone" (or tolerance for load and excursion without dysfunctional gapping) as therapists apply stress to healing tendons and may alter future rehabilitation protocols by allowing greater angles of motion (and thus tendon excursion), increased external load, and decreased time in protective orthoses (splints). However, at this time, the stronger repair techniques and the application of controlled stress remain the best and most well-supported intervention after tendon injury and repair in the recovery of functional tendon excursion and joint range of motion. The hand therapist's role in this process remains a critical component contributing to satisfactory outcomes.

Effects of tension across the tendon repair site on tendon gap and ultimate strength

PURPOSE

Tendons repaired with varying amounts of tension result in different degrees of shortening of the tendon segment within core sutures, which may affect tensile strengths. We aimed to investigate the effects of tension across the repair site on gap formation forces and ultimate strength.

METHODS

Fifty-seven porcine flexor tendons were repaired with a 2-strand modified Kessler repair or a 4-strand cross-lock repair. For each type of repair, the tendons were divided into 3 groups: by 0%, 10%, or 20% shortening of tendon segment encompassed within core sutures. The repaired tendons had a single load-to-failure test in a materials testing machine. The forces required for initial and 2-mm gap formation and ultimate failure were recorded and statistically compared for each group.

RESULTS

With either 2-strand or 4-strand repair, the tendons in the 10% tendon-segment shortening group withstood significantly higher initial and 2-mm gap formation forces than those in the group with no shortening, with average increases of 5 to 10 N after 10% shortening. Increasing the tendon-segment shortening to 20% produced a slight increase in the initial and 2-mm gap forces compared with those with 10% shortening, which was statistically significant only in the tendons with the 4-strand repair. The ultimate strengths were not significantly different among the tendons with either 2-strand or 4-strand repair of any degrees of shortening.

CONCLUSIONS

Tensioning the core suture to shorten its encompassed tendon segment by 10% substantially increases resistance to postoperative gapping. Further tensioning to produce 20% shortening of the tendon segment increased the gapping forces by a much smaller amount. This study suggests that a slightly tensioned surgical repair, shortening the encompassed tendon segment by approximately 10%, is appropriate.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Slightly tensioning core sutures across the tendon repair site, such as adding tension to cause 10% tendon-segment shortening, would greatly increase the gap resistance of the surgical repair.

A study of the anatomy and repair strengths of porcine flexor and extensor tendons: are they appropriate experimental models?

Although both porcine flexor and extensor tendons have been used in tendon repair research, no studies have specifically studied the anatomical differences and repair strengths in both types of tendons. We used 12 pig trotters to observe the anatomy of these tendons and compared the 2 mm gap and ultimate strengths of flexor and extensor tendons. There were four annular (A1, A2, A3, and A4) pulleys and one oblique pulley, which form a fibro-osseous tunnel for the flexor tendons, but the anatomy of the porcine extensor tendons was markedly different from the human flexor or extensor tendons. The diameter of flexor tendons was significantly greater than that of the extensors. The 2 mm gap and ultimate strengths of the flexor tendon with either two-strand or four-strand repairs were significantly greater than those of the extensor tendon. We conclude that the porcine flexor tendon systems are similar to those in the human, but the extensor tendons are not similar to either the flexor or extensor tendons in humans. Flexor and extensor tendons have different repair strengths which should be taken into account when interpreting findings from investigations using these tendons.

Comparison of modified Kessler tendon suture at different levels in the human flexor digitorum profundus tendon and porcine flexors and porcine extensors: an experimental biomechanical study

This study compared the biomechanical behaviour of repairs in the human flexor digitorum profundus tendon in zones I, II and III with repairs of different segments of the porcine flexor tendon of the second digit and the extensor digiti quarti proprius tendon, in order to assess the validity of porcine tendons as models for human flexor tendon repairs. These porcine tendons were selected after comparing their size with the human flexor digitorum profundus tendon. The tendon repairs were done in three segments of each porcine tendon and repairs in the human tendons were done in zones I,II and III. Ten tendons in each group yielded a total of 90 specimens. A modified Kessler repair was done with 3-0 coated braided polyester suture and subjected to uniaxial tensile testing. In human flexor tendons, the ultimate force was higher in zones I and II than in zone III. The porcine flexor digitorum profundus tendon from the second digit and the proximal segment of the extensor digiti quarti proprius tendon behaved similarly to the human flexor tendon in zone III and can be considered as surrogates for the human flexor tendon.