Computed Tomography Findings Can Help Identify Different Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyp Phenotypes

Endoscopic and Radiologic Central Compartment Disease as Predictors of Perennial Inhalant Allergen Sensitization in Chronic Rhinosinusitis

BACKGROUND

Central compartment atopic disease (CCAD) is a recently described variant of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) strongly associated with atopy. The association between central compartment disease (CCD) and inhalant allergy is not well established in South-East Asia, where perennial allergic rhinitis is common.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to evaluate endoscopic and radiologic CCD as predictors of perennial allergen sensitization in primary CRS. The secondary objective was to compare clinical characteristics of CCAD with other CRS subtypes (CRSwNP and CRSsNP).

METHODS

A retrospective study of consecutive patients with primary CRS who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery at our institution was performed. Allergen sensitization was confirmed by skin or serum testing. Endoscopy records and computed tomography scans of paranasal sinuses were reviewed for CCD. The diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic and radiologic CCD in predicting atopy was calculated.

RESULTS

There were 104 patients (43 CCAD, 30 CRSwNP and 31 CRSsNP). Endoscopic CCD was significantly associated with aeroallergen sensitization (odds ratio (OR) 3.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.65-9.67, P = 0.002). Endoscopic CCD predicted atopy with 57% sensitivity, 72% specificity, 69% positive predictive value and positive likelihood ratio of 2.05. Radiologic CCD was not associated with aeroallergen sensitization (OR 0.728, 95%CI 0.292-1.82, P = 0.496). There were more CCAD patients who reported hyposmia (86% vs 42%, P < 0.001) and had anosmia on olfactory testing than CRSsNP (65% vs 14%, P = 0.015). The prevalence of atopy was significantly higher in CCAD than CRSwNP and CRSsNP (70% vs 37% and 42%, P = 0.015 and P = 0.05, respectively). Median serum total immunoglobulin E was higher in CCAD (283 IU/ml) and CRSwNP (127 IU/ml) than CRSsNP (27 IU/ml, P = 0.006 and P = 0.042, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic CCD was a better predictor of inhalant allergy than radiologic CCD in primary CRS, in a locale of perennial allergic rhinitis.

Outcomes of endoscopic sinus surgery in patients with central compartment atopic disease

Background

Central compartment atopic disease (CCAD) is a subtype of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Research focusing on the endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) outcomes of CCAD is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of ESS in CCAD and compared to 2 following subtypes: chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and concomitant polypoid disease in the central compartment (CRSwNP/CC) and CRSwNP not otherwise specified (CRSwNP NOS).

Methods

This case-control study enrolled patients with bilateral CRSwNP who underwent ESS and had at least 1 year of follow-up. Patients were classified into CCAD, CRSwNP/CC, and CRSwNP NOS. The demographic data, preoperative disease severity, and surgery outcomes, including CRS control status, endoscopic score, and symptom scores at 1 year postoperatively, were collected. We defined well controlled and partly controlled as appropriate disease control.

Results

This study screened 259 patients and enrolled 138 patients with complete medical records and 1-year follow-up (CCAD N = 51, CRSwNP/CC N = 55, CRSwNP NOS N = 32). Among them, appropriate disease control was achieved in 84.3% of patients (43/51) in the CCAD group, 69.1% (38/55) in the CRSwNP/CC group, and 93.7% (30/32) in the CRSwNP NOS group (P = 0.029). Then we performed post-hoc analysis using appropriate disease control and uncontrolled. There was a significant difference between CRSwNP/CC and CRSwNP NOS (P = 0.007), but no significant difference compared CCAD group to CRSwNP/CC group (P = 0.065) and CRSwNP NOS group (P = 0.199). There were significant differences in endoscopic E-score among groups (P < 0.001). In post-hoc analysis, we found that CRSwNP/CC (Median [IQR], 33.32 [42.14]) had a significantly worse E-score than CCAD (8.33 [16.67]) and CRSwNP NOS (4.17 [8.30]). Also, postoperative olfactory visual analog scale (VAS) scores significantly differed among groups (P = 0.043). However, post-hoc analysis showed no difference between any 2 groups. There were no differences in postoperative VAS scores of obstruction (P = 0.159), rhinorrhea (P = 0.398), and headache/facial pain (P = 0.092).

Conclusion

Most CCAD patients had good surgical outcomes 1 year after surgery. Meanwhile, the CRSwNP/CC group had the fewest patients under appropriate disease control.

Imaging of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in the era of biological therapies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the sinonasal cavities classified into two major phenotypes: CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and without nasal polyps (CRSsNP). The diagnosis of CRS is based on clinical symptoms associated with imaging and/or nasal endoscopy findings of mucosal inflammation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recently, novel biological therapies have emerged as therapeutic options for CRSwNP. Imaging is helpful in deciding whether surgery is likely to be beneficial and in guiding surgery. It can also help demonstrate a clinical response to medical therapy. However, specific guidelines concerning the role of imaging in CRwNP are lacking.

SUMMARY

This article provides a comprehensive and critical multidisciplinary review of the role of conventional radiology, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis and characterization of CRSwNP. Since the complete characterization of nasal polyps on CT or MR images is very challenging, we provide a critical review of the best imaging methods and essential reporting elements used to assess nasal polyps.

Inflammatory characteristics of central compartment atopic disease

BACKGROUND

Central compartment atopic disease (CCAD) is an emerging phenotype of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) characterized by prominent central nasal inflammatory changes. This study compares the inflammatory characteristics of CCAD relative to other phenotypes of CRSwNP.

METHODS

A cross-sectional analysis of data from a prospective clinical study was performed on patients with CRSwNP who were undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). Patients with CCAD, aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD), allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS), and non-typed CRSwNP (CRSwNP NOS) were included and mucus cytokine levels and demographic data were analyzed for each group. Chi-squared/Mann-Whitney U tests and partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) were performed for comparison and classification.

RESULTS

A total of 253 patients were analyzed (CRSwNP, n = 137; AFRS, n = 50; AERD, n = 42; CCAD, n = 24). Patients with CCAD were the least likely to have comorbid asthma (p = 0.0004). The incidence of allergic rhinitis in CCAD patients did not vary significantly compared to patients with AFRS and AERD, but was higher compared to patients with CRSwNP NOS (p = 0.04). On univariate analysis, CCAD was characterized by less inflammatory burden, with reduced levels of interleukin 6 (IL-6), IL-8, interferon gamma (IFN-γ), and eotaxin relative to other groups and significantly lower type 2 cytokines (IL-5, IL-13) relative to both AERD and AFRS. These findings were supported by multivariate PLS-DA, which clustered CCAD patients into a relatively homogenous low-inflammatory cytokine profile.

CONCLUSIONS

CCAD has unique endotypic features compared to other patients with CRSwNP. The lower inflammatory burden may be reflective of a less severe variant of CRSwNP.

Novel insights into central compartment atopic disease - a literature review

INTRODUCTION

Central compartment atopic disease (CCAD) is a newly recognized variant subtype of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Although CCAD has been reported to be correlated with allergy, there is still a considerable gap in our knowledge regarding CCAD.

AREAS COVERED

We have conducted a thorough analysis of the literature on CCAD. This review provides current understanding and therapeutic strategies of CCAD. In this article, we will review the clinical presentations and parameters, allergy-related etiology, endotypes, and recommended management of CCAD.

EXPERT OPINION

CCAD is considered as an aeroallergen-driven type 2/eosinophilic inflammatory pattern. Although CCAD can be diagnosed by endoscopy and radiology, as well as allergen test, pathogenesis and management strategies leave much to be desired, and further studies are needed.

International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: Allergic rhinitis - 2023

BACKGROUND

In the 5 years that have passed since the publication of the 2018 International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (ICAR-Allergic Rhinitis 2018), the literature has expanded substantially. The ICAR-Allergic Rhinitis 2023 update presents 144 individual topics on allergic rhinitis (AR), expanded by over 40 topics from the 2018 document. Originally presented topics from 2018 have also been reviewed and updated. The executive summary highlights key evidence-based findings and recommendation from the full document.

METHODS

ICAR-Allergic Rhinitis 2023 employed established evidence-based review with recommendation (EBRR) methodology to individually evaluate each topic. Stepwise iterative peer review and consensus was performed for each topic. The final document was then collated and includes the results of this work.

RESULTS

ICAR-Allergic Rhinitis 2023 includes 10 major content areas and 144 individual topics related to AR. For a substantial proportion of topics included, an aggregate grade of evidence is presented, which is determined by collating the levels of evidence for each available study identified in the literature. For topics in which a diagnostic or therapeutic intervention is considered, a recommendation summary is presented, which considers the aggregate grade of evidence, benefit, harm, and cost.

CONCLUSION

The ICAR-Allergic Rhinitis 2023 update provides a comprehensive evaluation of AR and the currently available evidence. It is this evidence that contributes to our current knowledge base and recommendations for patient evaluation and treatment.

Clinical characteristics of central compartment atopic disease in Southern China

BACKGROUND

Central compartment atopic disease (CCAD) is a newly reported subset of chronic rhinosinusitis. It was considered associated with inhalant antigen. However, CCAD in Chinese population is not fully studied yet.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe the clinical manifestations of CCAD and compared the following two subtypes: sinonasal polyps and concomitant polypoid disease in the central compartment (CRSwNP/CC) and CRSwNP not otherwise specified (CRSwNP NOS). Also, we compared the clinical manifestations of atopy CCAD and non-atopy CCAD.

METHODS

We consecutively enrolled CRSwNP patients without prior sinus surgery, and assessed the nasal endoscopy and computed tomography of the paranasal sinuses. Allergy was confirmed by skin or serum testing. Eosinophilic CRSwNP (ECRS) was considered as tissue eosinophils to total inflammatory cells >10%.

RESULTS

We enrolled a total of 116 patients, including 39 with CCAD, 38 with CRSwNP/CC and 39 with CRSwNP NOS. Atopy was detected in 37.1% of the CCAD group, an incidence showing no significant difference from those in the other two groups (37.1% in the CRSwNP/CC group, 31.0% in the CRSwNP NOS group; p = 0.846). However, the incidence of ECRS in the CCAD group was the highest among the different groups (97.4% in the CCAD group vs. 67.6% in the CRSwNP/CC group vs. 35.1% in the CRSwNP NOS group; p = 0.000). In addition, the incidence of asthma in the CCAD group (33.3%) was significantly higher than that in the CRSwNP NOS group (10.3%), but quite similar to CRSwNP/CC (34.2%). In the subgroup analysis of CCAD, only total serum IgE and sIgE demonstrated significant differences between atopy CCAD and non-atopy CCAD.

CONCLUSION

CCAD in Southern China may associate with asthma and significant eosinophilia, with a lower incidence of systemic allergy based on skin and serum testing.

A Prospective Analysis of Systemic and Local Aeroallergen Sensitivity in Central Compartment Atopic Disease

OBJECTIVE

To compare systemic allergen sensitivity and local allergen sensitivity in the sinonasal tissue of patients with a recently identified subtype of chronic rhinosinusitis strongly associated with allergy: central compartment atopic disease (CCAD).

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Academic tertiary care rhinology clinic.

METHODS

Fifteen participants with endoscopic and radiographic evidence of CCAD underwent systemic allergy testing with skin testing and measurement of serum specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) to 15 regionally common aeroallergens. Local allergen sensitivity was determined by measuring sIgE to these same 15 allergens in their sinonasal tissue. sIgE testing was performed by ImmunoCAP assay.

RESULTS

Of the 15 participants, 14 were sensitive to at least 1 allergen locally in the central compartment and systemically on skin or serum testing. Among all participants, 4 were sensitive to allergens on central compartment sIgE testing that they were not sensitive to on skin and serum sIgE testing (range, 1-8 discordant allergens). Comparisons between local and systemic aeroallergen sensitivity results showed statistically significant correlations (P < .05) ranging from weak to strong.

CONCLUSION

Systemic allergy testing is recommended in the initial workup for CCAD. Local allergen sensitivities may be present in a subset of patients with CCAD. Further study of the clinical significance of these sensitivities should be undertaken in CCAD, with evaluation of the role of medical therapies and allergen immunotherapy in the treatment of CCAD.

Preoperative Sinonasal Computed Tomography Score in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps

This study investigated the relationship between sinonasal inflammatory involvement according to the computed tomography (CT) staging system (Lund–Mackay score) with clinical, laboratory, histopathological and prognostic features of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Seventy-eight patients with CRSwNP who had undergone surgery were enrolled. Total (p = 0.0062), ethmoid (p = 0.0496), sphenoid (p = 0.0335), ostiomeatal complex (OMC) (p = 0.0235) and frontal (p = 0.0164) CT scores were predictive of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs-exacerbated respiratory disease (NERD) in the univariate analysis. Total (p = 0.0022), ethmoid (p = 0.0290), sphenoid (p = 0.0370), frontal (p = 0.0116), maxillary (p = 0.0357) and OMC (p = 0.0058) CT scores were predictve of asthma at the univariate analysis. No significant differences were found between patients with vs. without allergy in terms of total and partial CT scores. High blood eosinophil counts (>0.24 vs. ≤0.24 cells × 109/L) resulted in being associated with total (p = 0.0213), maxillary (p = 0.0227) and ethmoid (p = 0.0491) CT scores in the univariate analysis. Higher ethmoid (p = 0.0006) and total sinonasal (p = 0.0027) CT scores were found to predict histopathologically eosinophil CRSwNPs in the univariate analysis. CT scores did not result as predictive of NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease, asthma, or blood eosinophil count at the multivariate analysis. Risk of relapse was related to the presence of NERD (p = 0.0207, HR [95% CI] 3.914 [1.232–12.435]), higher preoperative total (HR = 1.098 95%CI: 1.001–1.204, p = 0.0486) and frontal sinus CT scores (HR = 1.555 95%CI: 1.006–1.886, p = 0.0218), but these results were not confirmed by the multivariable analysis. Sinonasal CT scores showed significant differences in this heterogeneous inflammatory condition. Identifying CRSwNP characteristics is necessary to avoid generic treatments with poor outcomes.

Clinical evaluation and diagnosis of aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease

Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) is a condition composed of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis and asthma that is defined by respiratory hypersensitivity reactions to the cyclooxygenase 1-inhibitory effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. It is diagnosed in 5% to 15% of patients with asthma and is even more common in those with comorbid nasal polyposis. Diagnosis is confirmed after an aspirin challenge procedure, yet many patients present with all components and can reliably be diagnosed by history. Patients with AERD commonly experience severe uncontrolled nasal polyposis and require multispecialty evaluation to properly stage and treat this condition. The presence of nasal polyposis plays a large component in the diminished quality of life in patients with AERD. In the last decade, multiple new therapeutic areas have been approved for type 2 airway diseases, offering patients with AERD many more options for control. This makes an early and accurate diagnosis of AERD important in the care of the larger population of type 2 airway diseases.

Central compartment atopic disease: outcomes compared with other subtypes of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps

BACKGROUND

Central compartment atopic disease (CCAD) is a variant of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) characterized by polypoid changes of the superior nasal septum, middle (MT), and/or superior turbinates (ST). This study evaluates surgical outcomes in patients with CCAD compared with other CRSwNP subtypes.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was performed at Emory University from May 2012 to November 2019. Patients undergoing primary endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) for CCAD, aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD), allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS), and CRSwNP not otherwise specified (CRSwNP NOS) were included consecutively, beginning with the earliest date of CCAD patient. Outcome measures included polyp recurrence, revision ESS, oral steroid use, and oral antibiotic use. Pearson chi-square and univariate analysis of variance (ANOVA) were performed for group comparisons.

RESULTS

Data was collected for 132 patients (CCAD = 38, AERD = 20, AFRS = 37, CRSwNP NOS = 37; 58 females, mean age 42.9 years [range, 13-85 years]). CCAD patients demonstrated polyp recurrence less frequently than expected, whereas AFRS patients had polyp recurrence more frequently than expected (p = 0.003; phi 0.32). CCAD patients underwent revision ESS less frequently than expected; AFRS and CRSwNP NOS underwent revision ESS more frequently than expected (p = 0.03; phi 0.26). CRSwNP NOS patients received more total antibiotic courses than those with CCAD (p = 0.01; eta-squared 0.09) and more courses of antibiotics per month than those with AFRS (p = 0.03; eta-squared 0.07). There was no significant difference in follow-up measures across groups (number of visits, total months, or visits per month).

CONCLUSION

Rates of polyp recurrence and revision ESS were significantly lower in CCAD patients compared with patients with other CRSwNP subtypes, suggesting durable benefit of ESS and postoperative medical therapy in CCAD patients.

Disease involvement in the central compartment in eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate disease presence in the central compartment (CC) in patients with eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS).

METHODS

Patients with eosinophilic CRS were divided into three endotypes: aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD), allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS), and eosinophilic CRS with nasal polyps (eCRSwNP). CT scans were reviewed for CC involvement, defined as the area between the superior nasal septum (SNS) and middle turbinate (MT). CC involvement was measured based on the degree of opacification (0: no opacification, 1: up to 50% opacification, and 2: >50% opacification), and distance from SNS to MT (mm). Patients who had lateralized MTs from prior surgery as the cause of CC widening were excluded. Patients who underwent orbital decompression were included as a control group.

RESULTS

Fifty patients in each group (AERD, AFRS, and eCRSwNP) and 50 control patients were included. Average number of surgeries was 2.5 in AERD (p = 0.05), 2 in AFRS (p = 0.4), and 1.7 in eCRSwNP. Preoperative CC distance was significantly higher in AERD versus control, AFRS, and eCRSwNP: 4.2 versus 2.8 mm (p < 0.0001), 4.2 versus 1.9 mm (p < 0.0001), and 4.2 versus 2.7 mm (p < 0.0001), respectively. Postoperatively, CC distance and degree of opacification were significantly higher in AERD versus control, AFRS, and eCRSwNP. Within the AERD group, CC distance was significantly higher postoperatively than preoperatively (6.5 vs. 4.2 mm, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

CC involvement is more significant in AERD patients and if present, rhinologists should be suspicious of the diagnosis. This area could represent a source of inflammatory load in patients with AERD.