1
|
Chen L, Zhang Y, Li Y, Song C, Lin F, Pan P. The Application of Awake-Prone Positioning Among Non-intubated Patients With COVID-19-Related ARDS: A Narrative Review. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:817689. [PMID: 35198575 PMCID: PMC8858818 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.817689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has significantly increased the number of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), necessitating respiratory support. This strain on intensive care unit (ICU) resources forces clinicians to limit the use of mechanical ventilation by seeking novel therapeutic strategies. Awake-prone positioning appears to be a safe and tolerable intervention for non-intubated patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure. Meanwhile, several observational studies and meta-analyses have reported the early use of prone positioning in awake patients with COVID-19-related ARDS (C-ARDS) for improving oxygenation levels and preventing ICU transfers. Indeed, some international guidelines have recommended the early application of awake-prone positioning in patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure attributable to C-ARDS. However, its effectiveness in reducing intubation rate, mortality, applied timing, and optimal duration is unclear. High-quality evidence of awake-prone positioning for hypoxemic patients with COVID-19 is still lacking. Therefore, this article provides an update on the current state of published literature about the physiological rationale, effect, timing, duration, and populations that might benefit from awake proning. Moreover, the risks and adverse effects of awake-prone positioning were also investigated. This work will guide future studies and aid clinicians in deciding on better treatment plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lingli Chen
- Center of Respiratory Medicine, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Yan Zhang
- Hunan Engineering Research Center for Intelligent Diagnosis and Treatment of Respiratory Disease, Changsha, China
| | - Yi Li
- National Key Clinical Specialty, Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Chao Song
- Department of Infection Control Center, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Fengyu Lin
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Changsha, China
| | - Pinhua Pan
- Center of Respiratory Medicine, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- *Correspondence: Pinhua Pan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
Background: The aim was to investigate the efficacy of prone positioning (PP) in the management of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia in various setups, with various modes of oxygen therapy and its optimal duration. Materials and methods: A systematic literature search was conducted from inception until May 15, 2021. Patients with a validated diagnosis of COVID-19 and receiving PP were included. Various factors, including intensive care unit (ICU) or non-ICU setup, mode of oxygen therapy, outcome, duration of proning, and limitations, were noted. Results: We retrieved 36 articles with a total of 1,385 patients for qualitative analysis. Out of 36 articles, there were 17 original articles, 09 case series, and 10 case reports. Out of 1,385 participants, 78.9% (n = 1,093) and 21.0% (n = 292) of patients were managed in ICU and non-ICU setup, respectively. Awake PP with high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) was found to be a promising technique; however, the result was inconclusive with helmet continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). No study has evaluated the optimal duration of awake PP and the associated long-term outcomes. Conclusion: We encourage the use of early awake self-proning in the management of COVID19 disease. However, the evidence in terms of its use in non-ICU setup, the optimal duration of PP, and various oxygenation devices are insufficient, thereby mandating further well-designed multicentric studies to evaluate its efficacy as an adjunct in the management of COVID-19 pneumonia in context to the aforementioned factor. How to cite this article: Chilkoti GT, Mohta M, Saxena AK, Ahmad Z, Sharma CS. Awake Prone Positioning in the Management of COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Systematic Review. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(8):896-905.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geetanjali T Chilkoti
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University College of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Medha Mohta
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University College of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Ashok K Saxena
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University College of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Zainab Ahmad
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University College of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Chhavi S Sharma
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University College of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pavlov I, He H, McNicholas B, Perez Y, Tavernier E, Trump MW, Jackson JA, Zhang W, Rubin DS, Spiegel T, Hung A, Estrada MÁI, Roca O, Vines DL, Cosgrave D, Mirza S, Laffey JG, Rice TW, Ehrmann S, Li J. Awake Prone Positioning in Non-Intubated Patients With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure Due to COVID-19. Respir Care 2021; 67:102-114. [PMID: 34234032 DOI: 10.4187/respcare.09191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Awake prone positioning (APP) has been advocated to improve oxygenation and prevent intubation of patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This paper aims to synthesize the available evidence on the efficacy of APP. METHODS We performed a systematic review of proportional outcomes from observational studies to compare intubation rate in patients treated with APP or with standard care. RESULTS A total of 46 published and 4 unpublished observational studies that included 2,994 subjects were included, of which 921 were managed with APP and 870 were managed with usual care. APP was associated with significant improvement of oxygenation parameters in 381 cases of 19 studies that reported this outcome. Among the 41 studies assessing intubation rates (870 subjects treated with APP and 852 subjects treated with usual care), the intubation rate was 27% (95% CI 19-37%) as compared to 30% (95% CI 20-42%) (P = .71), even when duration of application, use of adjunctive respiratory assist device (high-flow nasal cannula or noninvasive ventilation), and severity of oxygenation deficit were taken into account. There appeared to be a trend toward improved mortality when APP was compared with usual care (11% vs 22%), which was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS APP was associated with improvement of oxygenation but did not reduce the intubation rate in subjects with acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19. This finding is limited by the high heterogeneity and the observational nature of included studies. Randomized controlled clinical studies are needed to definitively assess whether APP could improve key outcome such as intubation rate and mortality in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivan Pavlov
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Hôpital de Verdun, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Hangyong He
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Bairbre McNicholas
- Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway and Department of Anaesthesia, University Hospital Galway, Saolta Hospital Group, Galway, Ireland
| | - Yonatan Perez
- Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CIC INSERM 1415, CRICS-TriggerSEP research network, CHRU Tours, Tours, France and INSERM, Centre d'étude des pathologies respiratoires, U1100, Université de Tours, Tours, France
| | - Elsa Tavernier
- INSERM 1246-SPHERE, Universities of Tours and Nantes, Tours, France; Clinical Investigation Center, INSERM 1415, CHRU Tours, Tours, France
| | - Matthew W Trump
- Department Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Iowa Clinic, West Des Moines, Iowa
| | - Julie A Jackson
- Department of Respiratory Therapy, UnityPoint Health, Des Moines, Iowa
| | - Wei Zhang
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Daniel S Rubin
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Thomas Spiegel
- Section of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Anthony Hung
- Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Miguel Ángel Ibarra Estrada
- Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Civil Fray Antonio Alcalde, Universidad de Guadalajara. Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
| | - Oriol Roca
- Servei de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Institut de Recerca Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; Ciber Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - David L Vines
- Department of Cardiopulmonary Sciences, Division of Respiratory Care, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - David Cosgrave
- Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway and Department of Anaesthesia, University Hospital Galway, Saolta Hospital Group, Galway, Ireland
| | - Sara Mirza
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - John G Laffey
- Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway and Department of Anaesthesia, University Hospital Galway, Saolta Hospital Group, Galway, Ireland
| | - Todd W Rice
- Division of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Stephan Ehrmann
- Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CIC INSERM 1415, CRICS-TriggerSEP research network, CHRU Tours, Tours, France and INSERM, Centre d'étude des pathologies respiratoires, U1100, Université de Tours, Tours, France.
| | - Jie Li
- Department of Cardiopulmonary Sciences, Division of Respiratory Care, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kalra RS, Dhanjal JK, Meena AS, Kalel VC, Dahiya S, Singh B, Dewanjee S, Kandimalla R. COVID-19, Neuropathology, and Aging: SARS-CoV-2 Neurological Infection, Mechanism, and Associated Complications. Front Aging Neurosci 2021; 13:662786. [PMID: 34149397 PMCID: PMC8209245 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.662786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The spectrum of health complications instigated by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19, caused by the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 or SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has been diverse and complex. Besides the evident pulmonary and cardiovascular threats, accumulating clinical data points to several neurological complications, which are more common in elderly COVID-19 patients. Recent pieces of evidence have marked events of neuro infection and neuroinvasion, producing several neurological complications in COVID-19 patients; however, a systematic understanding of neuro-pathophysiology and manifested neurological complications, more specifically in elderly COVID-19 patients is largely elusive. Since the elderly population gradually develops neurological disorders with aging, COVID-19 inevitably poses a higher risk of neurological manifestations to the aged patients. In this report, we reviewed SARS-CoV-2 infection and its role in neurological manifestations with an emphasis on the elderly population. We reviewed neuropathological events including neuroinfection, neuroinvasion, and their underlying mechanisms affecting neuromuscular, central- and peripheral- nervous systems. We further assessed the imminent neurological challenges in the COVID-19 exposed population, post-SARS-CoV-2-infection. Given the present state of clinical preparedness, the emerging role of AI and machine learning was also discussed concerning COVID-19 diagnostics and its management. Taken together, the present review summarizes neurological outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection and associated complications, specifically in elderly patients, and underlines the need for their clinical management in advance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajkumar Singh Kalra
- AIST-INDIA DAILAB, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Jaspreet Kaur Dhanjal
- Department of Computational Biology, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology Delhi, Okhla Industrial Estate, New Delhi, India
| | - Avtar Singh Meena
- CSIR-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology (CCMB), Hyderabad, India
| | - Vishal C. Kalel
- Department of Systems Biochemistry, Institute of Biochemistry and Pathobiochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Surya Dahiya
- Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Maharishi Markandeshwar College of Dental Sciences and Research, Ambala, India
| | - Birbal Singh
- ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute (IVRI), Regional Station, Palampur, India
| | - Saikat Dewanjee
- Advanced Pharmacognosy Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India
| | - Ramesh Kandimalla
- Applied Biology, CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Technology (IICT), Hyderabad, India
- Department of Biochemistry, Kakatiya Medical College, Warangal, India
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tan W, Xu DY, Xu MJ, Wang ZF, Dai B, Li LL, Zhao HW, Wang W, Kang J. The efficacy and tolerance of prone positioning in non-intubation patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and ARDS: a meta-analysis. Ther Adv Respir Dis 2021; 15:17534666211009407. [PMID: 33888007 PMCID: PMC8071979 DOI: 10.1177/17534666211009407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and aims: The application of prone positioning with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in non-intubation patients is increasing gradually, applying prone positioning for more high-flow nasal oxygen therapy (HFNC) and non-invasive ventilation (NIV) patients. This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and tolerance of prone positioning combined with non-invasive respiratory support in patients with AHRF or ARDS. Methods: We searched randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (prospective or retrospective cohort studies, RCTs and case series) published in PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1 January 2000 to 1 July 2020. We included studies that compared prone and supine positioning with non-invasive respiratory support in awake patients with AHRF or ARDS. The meta-analyses used random effects models. The methodological quality of the RCTs was evaluated using the Newcastle–Ottawa quality assessment scale. Results: A total of 16 studies fulfilled selection criteria and included 243 patients. The aggregated intubation rate and mortality rate were 33% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.26–0.42, I2 = 25%], 4% (95% CI: 0.01–0.07, I2 = 0%), respectively, and the intolerance rate was 7% (95% CI: 0.01–0.12, I2 = 5%). Prone positioning increased PaO2/FiO2 [mean difference (MD) = 47.89, 95% CI: 28.12–67.66; p < 0.00001, I2 = 67%] and SpO2 (MD = 4.58, 95% CI: 1.35–7.80, p = 0.005, I2 = 97%), whereas it reduced respiratory rate (MD = −5.01, 95% CI: −8.49 to −1.52, p = 0.005, I2 = 85%). Subgroup analyses demonstrated that the intubation rate of shorter duration prone (⩽5 h/day) and longer duration prone (>5 h/day) were 34% and 21%, respectively; and the mortality rate of shorter duration prone (⩽5 h/day) and longer duration prone (>5 h/day) were 6% and 0%, respectively. PaO2/FiO2 and SpO2 were significantly improved in COVID-19 patients and non-COVID-19 patients. Conclusion: Prone positioning could improve the oxygenation and reduce respiratory rate in both COVID-19 patients and non-COVID-19 patients with non-intubated AHRF or ARDS. The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Tan
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Dong-Yang Xu
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Meng-Jiao Xu
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Zan-Feng Wang
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Bing Dai
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, No. 155, Nanjing North Street, Heping District, Shenyang, Liaoning 110001, China
| | - Li-Li Li
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, No. 155, Nanjing North Street, Heping District, Shenyang, Liaoning 110001, China
| | - Hong-Wen Zhao
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Jian Kang
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chalmers JD, Crichton ML, Goeminne PC, Cao B, Humbert M, Shteinberg M, Antoniou KM, Ulrik CS, Parks H, Wang C, Vandendriessche T, Qu J, Stolz D, Brightling C, Welte T, Aliberti S, Simonds AK, Tonia T, Roche N. Management of hospitalised adults with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a European Respiratory Society living guideline. Eur Respir J 2021; 57:2100048. [PMID: 33692120 PMCID: PMC7947358 DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00048-2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 118] [Impact Index Per Article: 39.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2021] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Hospitalised patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as a result of SARS-CoV-2 infection have a high mortality rate and frequently require noninvasive respiratory support or invasive ventilation. Optimising and standardising management through evidence-based guidelines may improve quality of care and therefore patient outcomes. METHODS A task force from the European Respiratory Society and endorsed by the Chinese Thoracic Society identified priority interventions (pharmacological and non-pharmacological) for the initial version of this "living guideline" using the PICO (population, intervention, comparator, outcome) format. The GRADE approach was used for assessing the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Systematic literature reviews were performed, and data pooled by meta-analysis where possible. Evidence tables were presented and evidence to decision frameworks were used to formulate recommendations. RESULTS Based on the available evidence at the time of guideline development (20 February, 2021), the panel makes a strong recommendation in favour of the use of systemic corticosteroids in patients requiring supplementary oxygen or ventilatory support, and for the use of anticoagulation in hospitalised patients. The panel makes a conditional recommendation for interleukin (IL)-6 receptor antagonist monoclonal antibody treatment and high-flow nasal oxygen or continuous positive airway pressure in patients with hypoxaemic respiratory failure. The panel make strong recommendations against the use of hydroxychloroquine and lopinavir-ritonavir. Conditional recommendations are made against the use of azithromycin, hydroxychloroquine combined with azithromycin, colchicine, and remdesivir, in the latter case specifically in patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. No recommendation was made for remdesivir in patients requiring supplemental oxygen. Further recommendations for research are made. CONCLUSION The evidence base for management of COVID-19 now supports strong recommendations in favour and against specific interventions. These guidelines will be regularly updated as further evidence becomes available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James D Chalmers
- School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
- J.D. Chalmers and N. Roche are task force co-chairs
| | | | - Pieter C Goeminne
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, AZ Nikolaas, Sint-Niklaas, Belgium
| | - Bin Cao
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Lab, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, National Clinical Research Center of Respiratory Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Marc Humbert
- Service de Pneumologie et Soins Intensifs, Hôpital Bicêtre, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP); Université Paris-Saclay; Inserm UMR_S 999, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
| | - Michal Shteinberg
- Pulmonology institute and CF Center, Carmel Medical Center and the Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Katerina M Antoniou
- Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Pneumonology, Department of Respiratory Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Charlotte Suppli Ulrik
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital-Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | | | - Chen Wang
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Center of Respiratory Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, National Clinical Research Center of Respiratory Diseases, Beijing, China
| | | | - Jieming Qu
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, China
- Institute of Respiratory Diseases, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Daiana Stolz
- Clinic of Respiratory Medicine and Pulmonary Cell Research, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Clinic of Respiratory Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Tobias Welte
- Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Direktor der Abteilung Pneumologie, Hannover, Germany
| | - Stefano Aliberti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Respiratory Unit, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Anita K Simonds
- Sleep and Ventilation Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospital, Guys and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Thomy Tonia
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Roche
- Respiratory Medicine, Cochin Hospital, APHP Centre-University of Paris, Cochin Institute (INSERM UMR1016), Paris, France
- J.D. Chalmers and N. Roche are task force co-chairs
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cardona S, Downing J, Alfalasi R, Bzhilyanskaya V, Milzman D, Rehan M, Schwartz B, Yardi I, Yazdanpanah F, Tran QK. Intubation rate of patients with hypoxia due to COVID-19 treated with awake proning: A meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med 2021; 43:88-96. [PMID: 33550104 PMCID: PMC7839795 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.01.058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2020] [Revised: 01/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Awake prone positioning (PP), or proning, is used to avoid intubations in hypoxic patients with COVID-19, but because of the disease's novelty and constant evolution of treatment strategies, the efficacy of awake PP is unclear. We conducted a meta-analysis of the literature to assess the intubation rate among patients with COVID-19 requiring oxygen or noninvasive ventilatory support who underwent awake PP. METHODS We searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases through August 15, 2020 to identify relevant randomized control trials, observational studies, and case series. We performed random-effects meta-analyses for the primary outcome of intubation rate. We used moderator analysis and meta-regressions to assess sources of heterogeneity. We used the standard and modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scales (NOS) to assess studies' quality. RESULTS Our search identified 1043 articles. We included 16 studies from the original search and 2 in-press as of October 2020 in our analysis. All were observational studies. Our analysis included 364 patients; mean age was 56.8 (SD 7.12) years, and 68% were men. The intubation rate was 28% (95% CI 20%-38%, I2 = 63%). The mortality rate among patients who underwent awake PP was 14% (95% CI 7.4%-24.4%). Potential sources of heterogeneity were study design and setting (practice and geographic). CONCLUSIONS Our study demonstrated an intubation rate of 28% among hypoxic patients with COVID-19 who underwent awake PP. Awake PP in COVID-19 is feasible and practical, and more rigorous research is needed to confirm this promising intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Cardona
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Jessica Downing
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Reem Alfalasi
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Vera Bzhilyanskaya
- Research Associate Program in Emergency Medicine and Critical Care, The Critical Care Resuscitation Unit, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - David Milzman
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mehboob Rehan
- Department of Medicine, Eastern Idaho Regional Medical Center, Idaho Falls, ID, USA
| | - Bradford Schwartz
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Prince George's Hospital Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Isha Yardi
- Research Associate Program in Emergency Medicine and Critical Care, The Critical Care Resuscitation Unit, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Fariba Yazdanpanah
- Department of Medicine, University of Maryland Capital Region Health, Prince George's Hospital Center, Cheverly, MD, USA
| | - Quincy K Tran
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Research Associate Program in Emergency Medicine and Critical Care, The Critical Care Resuscitation Unit, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Program in Trauma, The R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wendt C, Mobus K, Weiner D, Eskin B, Allegra JR. Prone Positioning of Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Who Are Nonintubated in Hypoxic Respiratory Distress: Single-Site Retrospective Health Records Review. J Emerg Nurs 2020; 47:279-287.e1. [PMID: 33558073 PMCID: PMC7762706 DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2020.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2020] [Revised: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 12/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In March and April 2020 of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, site clinical practice guidelines were implemented for prone positioning of patients with suspected coronavirus disease 2019 in hypoxic respiratory distress who are awake, alert, and spontaneously breathing. The purpose of this pandemic disaster practice improvement project was to measure changes in pulse oximetry associated with prone positioning of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 infection in adult acute respiratory distress or adult respiratory distress syndrome, who are awake, alert, spontaneously breathing, and nonintubated. METHODS A retrospective chart review of patients who were coronavirus disease 2019 positive in the emergency department from March 30, 2020 to April 30, 2020 was conducted for patients with a room air pulse oximetry <90% and a preprone position pulse oximetry ≤94% who tolerated prone positioning for at least 30 minutes. The primary outcome was the change in pulse oximetry associated with prone positioning, measured on room air, with supplemental oxygen, and approximately 30 minutes after initiating prone positioning. Median and mean differences were compared with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and paired t-test. RESULTS Of the 440 patients with coronavirus disease 2019, 31 met inclusion criteria. Median pulse oximetry increased as 83% (interquartile range, 75%-86%) on room air, 90% (interquartile range, 89%-93%) with supplemental oxygen, and 96% (interquartile range, 94%-98%) with prone positioning (z = -4.48, P < .001). A total of 45% (n = 14) were intubated during their hospital stay, and 26% (n = 8) of the included patients died. DISCUSSION In patients with coronavirus disease 2019 who are awake, alert, and spontaneously breathing, an initially low pulse oximetry reading improved with prone positioning. Future studies are needed to determine the association of prone positioning with subsequent endotracheal intubation and mortality.
Collapse
|
9
|
Weatherald J, Solverson K, Zuege DJ, Loroff N, Fiest KM, Parhar KKS. Awake prone positioning for COVID-19 hypoxemic respiratory failure: A rapid review. J Crit Care 2020; 61:63-70. [PMID: 33096347 PMCID: PMC7450241 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.08.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Revised: 08/10/2020] [Accepted: 08/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jason Weatherald
- Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Libin Cardiovascular Institute, Alberta Health Services, Canada.
| | - Kevin Solverson
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta Health Services, Canada.
| | - Danny J Zuege
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta Health Services, Canada; Critical Care Strategic Clinical Network, Alberta Health Services, Canada.
| | - Nicole Loroff
- Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Libin Cardiovascular Institute, Alberta Health Services, Canada.
| | - Kirsten M Fiest
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta Health Services, Canada; Department of Community Health Sciences and O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Canada.
| | - Ken Kuljit S Parhar
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta Health Services, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|