1
|
Pozo-Rosich P, Carmo M, Muñiz A, Armada B, Moya-Alarcón C, Pascual J. Migraine treatment: quo vadis? Real-world data study (2015-2022) in Spain. BMC Neurol 2024; 24:107. [PMID: 38566063 PMCID: PMC10985889 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-024-03600-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Migraine is a leading cause of disability, estimated to affect one-in-ten people in Spain. This study aimed to describe the management of migraine in Spain and identify improvement areas. METHODS Non-interventional, retrospective, cross-sectional cohort study conducted using an electronic medical records database covering visits to public healthcare providers for 3% of the Spanish population. Patients with a migraine diagnosis (ICD-9 346) between 01/2015 and 04/2022 were included, as well as their demographic and clinical characteristics, prescribed migraine treatments and the specialty of the prescribing physicians. RESULTS The database included 61,204 patients diagnosed with migraine. A migraine treatment had been prescribed to 50.6% of patients over the last 24 months (only acute to 69.5%, both acute and preventive to 24.2%, and only preventive to 6.3%). The most frequently prescribed treatments were NSAIDs (56.3%), triptans (44.1%) and analgesics (28.9%). Antidepressants were the most common preventive treatment (prescribed to 17.9% of all treated patients and 58.7% of those treated with a preventive medication), and anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies the least prescribed (1.7%; 5.7%). In 13.4% of cases, preventive medications were the first treatment: alone in 5.8% of cases and together with an acute medication in 7.6%. A fifth of patients who were initially prescribed with only acute treatment were later prescribed a preventive medication (20.7%). On average, it took 29.4 months for this change to occur. Two-thirds of patients started their preventive treatment in primary care (64.2%). The percentage of patients treated by a neurologist increased with the number of received preventive medications. However, 28.8% of patients who had already been prescribed five or more distinct preventive treatments were not treated by a neurologist. Migraine patients had between 1.2- and 2.2-times higher prevalence of comorbidities than the general population, age-gender adjusted. CONCLUSIONS Our study emphasizes the need for improved management of migraine in Spain to reduce the risk of chronification and improve patient outcomes. More training and coordination across healthcare professionals is necessary to recognize and address risk factors for migraine progression, including multiple associated comorbidities and several lines of treatment, and to provide personalized treatment plans that address the complex nature of the condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Neurology Department, Headache Unit, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, 119-129 Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, 08035, Spain.
- Headache Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | - Julio Pascual
- Service of Neurology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, Universidad de Cantabria and Valdecilla Biomedical Research Institute (IDIVAL), Santander, Cantabria, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pozo-Rosich P, Poveda JL, Crespo C, Martínez M, Rodríguez JM, Irimia P. Is erenumab an efficient alternative for the prevention of episodic and chronic migraine in Spain? Results of a cost-effectiveness analysis. J Headache Pain 2024; 25:40. [PMID: 38491460 PMCID: PMC10943917 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-024-01747-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The reimbursement of erenumab in Spain and other European countries is currently restricted because of the cost of this novel therapy to patients with migraine who have experienced previous failures to traditional preventive treatments. However, this reimbursement policy should be preferably based on cost-effectiveness studies, among other criteria. This study performed a cost-effectiveness analysis of erenumab versus topiramate for the prophylactic treatment of episodic migraine (EM) and versus placebo for chronic migraine (CM). METHODS A Markov model with a 10-year time horizon, from the perspective of the Spanish National Healthcare System, was constructed based on data from responder and non-responder patients. A responder was defined as having a minimum 50% reduction in the number of monthly migraine days (MMD). A hypothetical cohort of patients with EM with one or more prior preventive treatment failures and patients with CM with more than two treatment failures was considered. The effectiveness score was measured as an incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained and cost per migraine day (MD) avoided. Data from clinical outcomes and patient characteristics were obtained from erenumab clinical trials (NCT02066415, STRIVE, ARISE, LIBERTY and HER-MES). Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to validate the robustness of the model. RESULTS After a 10-year follow-up, the estimated QALYs were 5.88 and 6.11 for patients with EM treated with topiramate and erenumab, respectively. Erenumab showed an incremental cost per patient of €4,420 vs topiramate. For CM patients, erenumab resulted in 0.756 QALYs gained vs placebo; and an incremental cost of €1,814. Patients treated with erenumab achieved reductions in MD for both EM and CM (172 and 568 MDs, respectively). The incremental cost per QALY gained with erenumab was below the Spanish threshold of €30,000/QALY for both health and societal perspectives (EM €19,122/QALY and CM €2,398/QALY). CONCLUSIONS Erenumab is cost-effective versus topiramate as a preventive treatment for EM and versus placebo for patients with CM from the perspective of the Spanish National Health System.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Neurology Department, Headache Unit, Valld'Hebron University Hospital, Ps. Vall d'Hebron 119-12, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
- Headache Research Group, Medicine Departament, VHIR, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - José Luis Poveda
- Pharmacy Department, Hospital Universitari I Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Carlos Crespo
- Axentiva Solutions, Barcelona, Spain
- G.M. Statistics Department, Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Pablo Irimia
- Department of Neurology, Headache Unit, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
García-Azorín D, Moya-Alarcón C, Armada B, Sánchez Del Río M. Societal and economic burden of migraine in Spain: results from the 2020 National Health and Wellness Survey. J Headache Pain 2024; 25:38. [PMID: 38486155 PMCID: PMC10941425 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-024-01740-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The burden of migraine goes beyond the pain and associated symptoms. We aimed to describe the impact of migraine in healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), work productivity, and mood disorders, as well as its economic cost. METHODS Case-control study nested in a cross-sectional analysis of patient-reported data collected between 30/12/2019 and 20/04/2020 as part of the National Health and Wellness Survey, from respondents located in Spain. Adults (≥ 18 years old) who reported a physician diagnosis of migraine and ≥ 1 monthly headache days (MHD) in the previous 30 days were included. HCRU, health-related quality-of-life, depression scores, work and activity impairment, and the associated direct and indirect costs were assessed for four cohorts of migraine patients, according to the frequency of headache (MHD: 1-3, 4-7, 8-14, ≥ 15) and compared to a no-migraine control, matched to migraine cases by a propensity score based on demographic and clinical variables. RESULTS The survey was completed by 595 people with active migraine, of whom 461 (77.4%) experienced < 8 MHDs and 134 (22.6%) ≥ 8 MHDs, and 1,190 non-migraine matched controls. Migraine patients presented worse mental and physical health functioning (SF-12 MCS: 41.9 vs. 44.7, p < 0.001; SF-12 PCS: 48.6 vs. 51.5, p < 0.001), worse self-reported health (EQ-5D VAS: 65.8 vs. 73.5, p < 0.001), more severe depression (PHQ-9: 8.9 vs. 6.1, p < 0.001), and higher overall work impairment (WPAI: 41.4 vs. 25.5, p < 0.001). People with migraine had higher HCRU, twice higher hospitalization rates (17.0% vs. 8.3%, p < 0.001) and 1.6 higher emergency room (ER) visit rates (51.4% vs. 31.2%, p < 0.001). Having migraine translated into higher annual costs with HCRU (€894 vs. €530) and productivity losses (€8,000 vs. €4,780) per person. Respondents with more MHDs presented worse outcomes and higher costs but suffering from 1-3 MHD also increased costs by 51.3%. CONCLUSIONS Having migraine not only causes a massive impact on patients' quality of life and ability to work, but it also generates considerable economic costs for society. In Spain, having migraine was associated to 1.7 higher costs per patient. The clinical and economic burden increases with the frequency of headaches but is higher than controls even in patients suffering from 1-3 MHD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David García-Azorín
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid Health Research Institute (VALLHRI), Calle Rondilla Sta.Teresa, S/N, Valladolid, 47010, Spain.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tana C, Cipollone F, Giamberardino MA, Martelletti P. New drugs targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide for the management of migraines. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs 2023; 28:233-240. [PMID: 37996401 DOI: 10.1080/14728214.2023.2288334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Significant advances in migraine research have contributed to the development of new drugs for the treatment of migraine. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) or its receptor and CGRP receptor antagonists (gepants) have been associated with a good safety profile and resulted in an overall efficacy in reducing the number of monthly migraine days both in episodic and chronic forms of migraine. AREAS COVERED The results from main investigation studies (phase 2 or 3) of CGRP-targeting drugs (both anti-CGRP mAbs and gepants) are reported in this expert-opinion review. EXPERT OPINION The introduction of new drugs targeting CGRP is a significant breakthrough in the migraine field, and represents a new generation of therapeutic agents that are available to manage migraine. The evaluation of efficacy and safety in the long-term follow-up and the development of trials comparing the available drugs could improve the current knowledge. The economic sustainability of these drugs remains to be clarified, and a cost-cutting campaign should be promoted based on the high burden of migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudio Tana
- Headache Center, Geriatrics Clinic, SS Annunziata Hospital of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Francesco Cipollone
- Department of Medicine and Science of Aging, Medical Clinic, SS. Annunziata Hospital of Chieti, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Maria Adele Giamberardino
- Headache Center, Geriatrics Clinic, SS Annunziata Hospital of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
- Department of Medicine and Science of Aging and CAST, G. D'Annunzio University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Paolo Martelletti
- School of Health Sciences, Unitelma Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Calleja-Hernández MÁ, Guerrero-Peral ÁL, Irimia-Sieira P, Martínez-López I, Santos-Lasaosa S, Sarobe-Carricas M, López-Matencio JMS, Láinez-Andrés JM. Consensus recommendations for the treatment of migraine prevention. Farm Hosp 2023; 47:246-253. [PMID: 37321919 DOI: 10.1016/j.farma.2023.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Revised: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objectives are to know the opinion of neurologists and hospital pharmacists on those aspects still under debate regarding the role of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in the preventive treatment of migraine. To identify those controversies that still exist. To propose agreed recommendations for improvement of care. And to promote access of clinicians and patients to these new treatments in the prevention of migraine with biological drugs, in order to improve patient care and follow-up. METHODOLOGY Recommendations for the use of biological drugs in the prevention of migraine were identified and evaluated through the Delphi consensus methodology, proposing 88 statements grouped into three themes: a clinical module that deals with the management of biological treatments in migraine; a patient module that discusses patient education and adherence improvement strategies; and a coordination module that includes statements related to strategies to improve joint work between the two groups. The 9-point Likert ordinal scale was used to score these recommendations and, subsequently, the data was statistically analyzed through different metrics. RESULTS After both rounds of voting, consensus was reached in agreement on 71 of the 88 statements (80.7%), leaving one statement (1.1%) with consensus in disagreement and 16 remaining as indeterminate (18.2%). CONCLUSIONS The high degree of consensus indicates that the opinion of neurologists and hospital pharmacists on the role of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of migraine is very similar and allows identifying those controversies that still exist, to improve the care and follow-up of patients with migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ángel Luis Guerrero-Peral
- Unidad de Cefaleas, Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, España
| | - Pablo Irimia-Sieira
- Departamento de Neurología, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, España
| | - Icíar Martínez-López
- Servicio de Farmacia Hospitalaria, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, España
| | - Sonia Santos-Lasaosa
- Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Clínico Universitario «Lozano Blesa», Zaragoza, España
| | - Maite Sarobe-Carricas
- Servicio de Farmacia Hospitalaria, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, España
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Calleja-Hernández MÁ, Guerrero-Peral ÁL, Irimia-Sieira P, Martínez-López I, Santos-Lasaosa S, Sarobe-Carricas M, López-Matencio JMS, Láinez-Andrés JM. [Translated article] Consensus recommendations on the preventive treatment of migraine. Farm Hosp 2023; 47:T246-T253. [PMID: 37730507 DOI: 10.1016/j.farma.2023.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Revised: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objectives are to know the opinion of neurologists and hospital pharmacists on those aspects still under debate regarding the role of anti-Calcitonin Gene-related Peptide monoclonal antibodies in the preventive treatment of migraine. To identify those controversies that still exist. To propose agreed recommendations for improvement of care. And to promote access of clinicians and patients to these new treatments in the prevention of migraine with biological drugs, in order to improve patient care and follow-up. METHODOLOGY Recommendations for the use of biological drugs in the prevention of migraine were identified and evaluated through the Delphi consensus methodology, proposing 88 statements grouped into 3 themes: a clinical module that deals with the management of biological treatments in migraine; a patient module that discusses patient education and adherence improvement strategies; and a coordination module that includes statements related to strategies to improve joint work between the two groups. The 9-point Likert ordinal scale was used to score these recommendations and, subsequently, the data was statistically analysed through different metrics. RESULTS After both rounds of voting, consensus was reached in agreement on 71 of the 88 statements (80.7%), leaving 1 statement (1.1%) with consensus in disagreement and 16 remaining as indeterminate (18.2%). CONCLUSIONS The high degree of consensus indicates that the opinion of neurologists and hospital pharmacists on the role of anti-Calcitonin Gene-related Peptide monoclonal antibodies in the preventive treatment of migraine is very similar and allows identifying those controversies that still exist, to improve the care and follow-up of patients with migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ángel Luis Guerrero-Peral
- Unidad de Cefaleas, Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Pablo Irimia-Sieira
- Departamento de Neurología, Clínica Universitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Icíar Martínez-López
- Adjunta del Servicio de Farmacia Hospitalaria, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Sonia Santos-Lasaosa
- Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Clínico Universitario "Lozano Blesa", Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Maite Sarobe-Carricas
- Jefe de Servicio de Farmacia Hospitalaria, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - José María Serra López-Matencio
- Adjunto del Servicio de Farmacia Hospitalaria, responsable consulta monográfica de atención farmacéutica en migraña, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Messina R, Huessler EM, Puledda F, Haghdoost F, Lebedeva ER, Diener HC. Safety and tolerability of monoclonal antibodies targeting the CGRP pathway and gepants in migraine prevention: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Cephalalgia 2023; 43:3331024231152169. [PMID: 36786548 DOI: 10.1177/03331024231152169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Direct comparisons of the tolerability and safety of migraine preventive treatments targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide pathway are lacking. This study aimed to compare the safety and tolerability of anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies and gepants in migraine prevention. METHODS A network meta-analysis of phase 3 randomized controlled trials assessing the safety and tolerability of anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (erenumab, eptinezumab, fremanezumab, or galcanezumab) and gepants (atogepant, rimegepant) in migraine prevention was performed. Primary outcomes were treatment-emergent adverse events and serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes included any adverse events, adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation and individual adverse events. RESULTS We included 19 randomized controlled trials, comprising 14,584 patients. Atogepant 120 mg (OR 2.22, 95% CI [1.26, 3.91]) and galcanezumab 240 mg (OR 1.63, 95% CI [1.33, 2.00]) showed the largest odds of treatment-emergent adverse events compared to placebo. While eptinezumab 30 mg had greater odds of adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation (OR 2.62, 95% CI [1.03,6.66]). No significant differences in serious adverse events were found between active treatments and placebo. Eptinezumab was associated with the lowest odds of treatment-emergent adverse events and serious adverse events compared to placebo, whereas erenumab was associated with the lowest odds of any adverse events and quarterly fremanezumab with the lowest odds of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events. CONCLUSION Monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide pathway and gepants are a safe and well tolerated option for migraine prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberta Messina
- Neuroimaging Research Unit and Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Eva-Maria Huessler
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology (IMIBE), University Hospital Essen, Germany
| | - Francesca Puledda
- Headache Group, Wolfson CARD, SLaM Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)-Wellcome Trust King's Clinical Research Facility, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Faraidoon Haghdoost
- The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, Australia
| | - Elena R Lebedeva
- Department of Neurology, the Ural State Medical University, Yekaterinburg, Russia.,International Headache Centre "Europe-Asia", Yekaterinburg, Russia
| | - Hans-Christoph Diener
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology (IMIBE), University Hospital Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Troy E, Shrukalla AA, Buture A, Conaty K, Macken E, Lonergan R, Melling J, Long N, Shaikh E, Birrane K, Tomkins EM, Goadsby PJ, Ruttledge MH. Medium-term real-world data for erenumab in 177 treatment resistant or difficult to treat chronic migraine patients: persistence and patient reported outcome measures after 17-30 months. J Headache Pain 2023; 24:5. [PMID: 36647006 PMCID: PMC9841480 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-022-01536-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2022] [Accepted: 12/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many migraine patients do not respond adequately to conventional preventive treatments and are therefore described as treatment/medically resistant or difficult to treat cases. Calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies are a relatively novel molecular treatment for episodic and chronic migraine that have been shown to be effective in short duration clinical trials in approximately 40-50% of all chronic migraine patients. Patient Related Outcome Measures (PROM) or Quality of Life (QoL) questionnaires are used to help measure response to treatment in migraine. Although some open label extension studies have become available for erenumab, there is a lack of real-world data pertaining to quality of life in the medium to long-term for chronic and treatment resistant migraine patients. METHODS A total of 177 treatment resistant CM patients were started on erenumab (70 mg or 140 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks) in our three specialist Headache Clinics. Of these, 174 had their first injection between December 2018 and October 2019. All patients were evaluated with the following PROM: the Headache Impact Test- 6, Migraine Associated Disability Assessment test and Migraine-Specific QoL Questionnaire, before starting treatment with erenumab and at intervals of 3-12 months after starting treatment. The decision to continue treatment was based on subjective clinical improvement of at least 30% (as reported by the patient), supported with diaries and QoL questionnaires. We present here the QoL measurements for this group of 177 patients. Prior preventive migraine treatments included conventional oral prophylactic medications (such as topiramate, candesartan, propranolol, or amitriptyline), at least two cycles of PREEMPT protocol onabotulinumtoxin A or (in a small number of cases) neuromodulation with single pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. RESULTS Of the 177 patients who started treatment with erenumab, 68/177 (38.4%) stopped during the first year, either due to lack of efficacy (no significant benefit or only minimal improvement) and/or possible side effects. 109/177 (61.6%) patients reported clinically significant improvement after 6-12 months and wished to stay on treatment. Twelve of these 109 patients subsequently stopped treatment in the period between 1 year and up to June 2021 (mainly due to a worsening of their migraine). Therefore, a total of 97/177 patients (54.8%) remained on treatment as of June 2021 (duration of treatment 17-30 months, median of 25 months). CONCLUSION Approximately 55% of treatment resistant or difficult to treat CM patients who trialled erenumab in our clinics reported a subjective benefit and were still on treatment after 17-30 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Troy
- grid.414315.60000 0004 0617 6058Department of Neurology, Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont Road, Dublin 9, Ireland
| | - Arif A. Shrukalla
- grid.414315.60000 0004 0617 6058Department of Neurology, Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont Road, Dublin 9, Ireland
| | - Alina Buture
- grid.411596.e0000 0004 0488 8430Dublin Neurological Institute, Department of Neurology, Mater Hospital, Eccles Street, Dublin 7, Ireland
| | - Katie Conaty
- grid.414315.60000 0004 0617 6058Department of Neurology, Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont Road, Dublin 9, Ireland
| | - Esther Macken
- grid.411596.e0000 0004 0488 8430Dublin Neurological Institute, Department of Neurology, Mater Hospital, Eccles Street, Dublin 7, Ireland
| | - Roisin Lonergan
- grid.411596.e0000 0004 0488 8430Dublin Neurological Institute, Department of Neurology, Mater Hospital, Eccles Street, Dublin 7, Ireland
| | - Jane Melling
- grid.411596.e0000 0004 0488 8430Dublin Neurological Institute, Department of Neurology, Mater Hospital, Eccles Street, Dublin 7, Ireland
| | - Niamh Long
- grid.414315.60000 0004 0617 6058Department of Neurology, Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont Road, Dublin 9, Ireland
| | - Eamonn Shaikh
- grid.414315.60000 0004 0617 6058Department of Neurology, Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont Road, Dublin 9, Ireland
| | - Kieran Birrane
- Independent Statistical Consultant, Wilton, Cork, Ireland
| | - Esther M. Tomkins
- grid.414315.60000 0004 0617 6058Department of Neurology, Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont Road, Dublin 9, Ireland
| | - Peter J. Goadsby
- grid.19006.3e0000 0000 9632 6718NIHR SLaM Clinical Research Facility at King’s, King’s College London, UK and Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA Los Angeles, USA
| | - Martin H. Ruttledge
- grid.414315.60000 0004 0617 6058Department of Neurology, Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont Road, Dublin 9, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nguyen JL, Munshi K, Peasah SK, Swart ECS, Kohli M, Henderson R, Good CB. Trends in utilization and costs of migraine medications, 2017–2020. J Headache Pain 2022; 23:111. [PMID: 36031609 PMCID: PMC9420279 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-022-01476-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective This study examines changes in utilization and costs trends associated with migraine medications. Background Migraine attacks are a burden to many patients. There are many pharmacotherapy options available with newer migraine drug classes entering the market in the past decade. Little is known about the use, associated costs, and the impact of the newer agents. Methods This retrospective, cross-sectional study examined 2017–2020 administrative claims from a large national pharmacy benefits manager. Patients aged ≥ 18 years enrolled in commercial, Medicare, Medicaid, or health insurance exchange insurance plans who filled ≥ 2 prescription claims for triptans, ergotamines, isometheptenes, gepants, ditans, and CGRP mABs were included. A two-sample t-test was conducted to estimate whether differences in mean utilization and costs between 2017 and 2020 were statistically significant for migraine drug classes, except for CGRP mABs, which were estimated between 2018 and 2020. Results The sample ranged from 161,369 (2017) to 240,330 (2020) patients. 84.5% (n = 203,110; 2020) of patients were women. The number of 30-day adjusted prescription fills for prophylaxis remained stable over the four-year period, except for CGRP mABs, which increased from 0.5% (n = 0.007; 2018) to 5.3% (n = 0.075; 2020). Antiepileptics, antidepressants and beta blockers were the most common prophylaxes, while triptans, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs/non-narcotic analgesics and opioids were the most common treatments utilized. CGRP mABs were the most expensive, while utilization of triptans were the highest. CGRP mABs had the largest increase in utilization (177.5%) and costs (166.3%) PPPM in 2020 ($291.17) compared to 2018 ($109.35), the year they were first available (p < 0.001). Between 2018 and 2020, costs increased overall and for commercial and Medicare enrollees, but remained unchanged for Medicaid and HIX members. Conclusion Our study demonstrates a shift in migraine medication utilization from 2017–2020, where increased use of CGRP mABs had a significant contribution to increased costs. These increased pharmacy costs must be weighed against the improved tolerability of these agents likely resulting in other healthcare and indirect cost savings. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10194-022-01476-y.
Collapse
|
10
|
Domitrz I, Kozubski W, Rożniecki JJ, Stępień A, Boczarska-Jedynak M. The Polish Headache Society and the Headache Section of the Polish Neurological Society Consensus Statement: update on new pharmacological therapies for migraine in clinical practice and public medication reimbursement program for chronic migraine. Arch Med Sci 2022; 18:1705-1707. [PMID: 36457955 PMCID: PMC9710265 DOI: 10.5114/aoms/153955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Izabela Domitrz
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Wojciech Kozubski
- Department of Neurology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
| | - Jacek J. Rożniecki
- Department of Neurology, Stroke, and Neurorehabilitation, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Adam Stępień
- Department of Neurology, Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Poland
| | | |
Collapse
|