1
|
Davidson CA, Kennedy K, Jackson KT. Trauma-Informed Approaches in the Context of Cancer Care in Canada and the United States: A Scoping Review. Trauma Violence Abuse 2023; 24:2983-2996. [PMID: 36086877 PMCID: PMC10594848 DOI: 10.1177/15248380221120836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Cancer is predominantly understood as a physical condition, but the experience of cancer is often psychologically challenging and has potential to be traumatic. Some people also experience re-traumatization during cancer because of previous, non-cancer-related trauma, such as intimate partner violence or adverse childhood experiences. A trauma-informed approach to care (TIC) has potential to enhance care and outcomes; however, literature regarding cancer-related TIC is limited. Accordingly, the objective of this scoping review was to identify what is known from existing literature about trauma-informed approaches to cancer care in Canada and the United States. A scoping review (using Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) framework) was conducted. The PsycINFO, CINAHL, MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), and Scopus databases, key journals, organizations, and reference lists were searched in February 2022. In total, 124 sources met the review criteria and 13 were included in the final review. Analysis included a basic descriptive summary and deductive thematic analysis using conceptual categories. Theorizations, applications, effectiveness, and feasibility of TIC were compiled, and gaps in TIC and recommendations for TIC were identified. TIC appeared to be growing in popularity and promising for improving cancer outcomes; however, gaps in the theorization, effectiveness, and feasibility of TIC persisted. Many recommendations for the application of TIC were not issued based on a strong body of evidence due to a lack of available literature. Further research is required to develop evidence-based recommendations regarding TIC related to cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis would be warranted upon literature proliferation.
Collapse
|
2
|
Campaña C, Cabieses B, Obach A, Vezzani F. " Healthcare should be the same for everyone": perceived inequities in therapeutic trajectories of adult patients with lung cancer in Chile, a qualitative study. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1228304. [PMID: 37663832 PMCID: PMC10468573 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1228304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Globally, it has been reported that different social determinants of health affect health outcomes in lung cancer (LC). Research on the therapeutic trajectories of patients (TTP) is a novel field for identifying barriers and facilitators in health. The objective of this study was to reveal perceived differences in TTP with LC in Chile according to selected social determinants of health (SDH) and the experiences of patients, health professionals, and civil society leaders. Methods This is a qualitative paradigm, one case-study design. Online semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients with LC, health professionals, and civil society leaders. The strategies for the recruitment process included social networks, civil society organizations, health professionals, and the snowball technique. A thematic analysis was carried out. Results Selected SDH impact LC's TTP in Chile, particularly concerning health system access, health services, information, and patient navigation experiences. The analysis of the experiences of the participants allowed us to identify barriers related to the selected SDH in three stages of the TTP: initiation, examinations, and diagnosis and treatment. Individuals with limited education, those residing outside the capital, women, and those in the public health system encountered more barriers throughout their TTP. Discussion Study findings suggest that being a woman with low education, from the public health system, and not from the capital might represent one of the most powerful intersections for experiencing barriers to effective healthcare in LC in Chile. It is necessary to monitor the TTP from an SDH perspective to guarantee the rights of access, opportunity, quality, and financial protection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carla Campaña
- Centre of Global Intercultural Health (CeSGI) ICIM, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile
- Programa de Doctorado en Ciencias e Innovación en Medicina (DCIM), Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile
| | - Báltica Cabieses
- Centre of Global Intercultural Health (CeSGI) ICIM, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile
- Center for Cancer Prevention and Control (CECAN), ANID FONDAP 152220002, Santiago, Chile
| | - Alexandra Obach
- Centre of Global Intercultural Health (CeSGI) ICIM, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile
- Center for Cancer Prevention and Control (CECAN), ANID FONDAP 152220002, Santiago, Chile
| | - Francisca Vezzani
- Centre of Global Intercultural Health (CeSGI) ICIM, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile
- Center for Cancer Prevention and Control (CECAN), ANID FONDAP 152220002, Santiago, Chile
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
Cancer screening is invaluable for early detection of disease, including for breast and lung cancer. Through early detection, cancer treatment can be commenced prior to the development of advanced stage disease, significantly reducing morbidity and mortality. However, eligible patients may face barriers when accessing screening services, and some groups may be more disproportionately affected than others. This review aims to describe some of the most prominent barriers that at-risk populations may face when accessing image-based cancer screening services in Canada. Characterizing these barriers would be helpful in determining the best strategies to increase uptake to these screening services and, consequently, improve health equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J Cao
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | - Nataly Farshait
- Healthcare Insurance Reciprocal of Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Michael N Patlas
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bourgeois A, Horrill TC, Mollison A, Lambert LK, Stajduhar KI. Barriers to cancer treatment and care for people experiencing structural vulnerability: a secondary analysis of ethnographic data. Int J Equity Health 2023; 22:58. [PMID: 36998035 PMCID: PMC10064679 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-023-01860-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A key pillar of Canada's healthcare system is universal access, yet significant barriers to cancer services remain for people impacted by structural vulnerability (e.g., poverty, homelessness, racism). For this reason, cancer is diagnosed at a later stage, resulting in worse patient outcomes, a reduced quality of life, and at a higher cost to the healthcare system. Those who face significant barriers to access are under-represented in cancer control services Consequently, these inequities result in people dying from cancers that are highly treatable and preventable, however; little is known about their treatment and care course. The aim of this study was to explore barriers to accessing cancer treatment among people experiencing structural vulnerability within a Canadian context. METHODS We conducted a secondary analysis of ethnographic data informed by critical theoretical perspectives of equity and social justice. The original research draws from 30 months of repeated interviews (n = 147) and 300 h of observational fieldwork with people experiencing health and social inequities at the end-of-life, their support persons, and service providers. RESULTS Our analysis identified four themes presenting as 'modifiable' barriers to inequitable access to cancer treatment: (1) housing as a key determinant for cancer treatment (2) impact of lower health literacy (3) addressing social care needs is a pre-requisite for treatment (4) intersecting and compounding barriers reinforce exclusion from cancer care. These inter-related themes point to how people impacted by health and social inequities are at times 'dropped' out of the cancer system and therefore unable to access cancer treatment. CONCLUSION Findings make visible the contextual and structural factors contributing to inequitable access to cancer treatment within a publically funded healthcare system. Identifying people who experience structural vulnerability, and approaches to delivering cancer services that are explicitly equity-oriented are urgently needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amber Bourgeois
- School of Nursing, University of Victoria, Institute on Aging & Lifelong Health, Stn. CSC Victoria, PO Box 1700, V8W 2Y2, Victoria, BC, Canada.
| | - Tara C Horrill
- College of Nursing, University of Manitoba, 89 Curry Place Winnipeg, R3T 2N2, Victoria, MB, Canada
| | - Ashley Mollison
- Social Dimensions of Health, University of Victoria Institute on Aging and Lifelong Health, Stn. CSC Victoria, PO Box 1700, V8W 2Y2, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | - Leah K Lambert
- School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, BC Cancer Suite 500, 686 West Broadway, V5Z 1G1, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Kelli I Stajduhar
- School of Nursing, University of Victoria, Institute on Aging & Lifelong Health, Stn. CSC Victoria, PO Box 1700, V8W 2Y2, Victoria, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sayani A, Ali MA, Dey P, Corrado AM, Ziegler C, Nicholson E, Lofters A. Interventions Designed to Increase the Uptake of Lung Cancer Screening: An Equity-Oriented Scoping Review. JTO Clin Res Rep 2023; 4:100469. [PMID: 36938372 PMCID: PMC10015251 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2023.100469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Revised: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Participation in lung cancer screening (LCS) is lower in populations with the highest burden of lung cancer risk (through the social patterning of smoking behavior) and lowest levels of health care utilization (through structurally inaccessible care) leading to a widening of health inequities. Methods We conducted a scoping review using the Arksey and O'Malley methodological framework to inform equitable access to LCS by illuminating knowledge and implementation gaps in interventions designed to increase the uptake of LCS. We comprehensively searched for LCS interventions (Ovid Medline, Excerpta Medica database, the Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Scopus from 2000 to June 22, 2021) and included peer-reviewed articles and gray literature published in the English language that describe an intervention designed to increase the uptake of LCS, charted data using our previously published tool and conduced a health equity analysis to determine the intended-unintended and positive-negative outcomes of the interventions for populations experiencing the greatest inequities. Results Our search yielded 3572 peer-reviewed articles and 54,292 pieces of gray literature. Ultimately, we included 35 peer-reviewed articles and one gray literature. The interventions occurred in the United States, United Kingdom, Japan, and Italy, focusing on shared decision-making, the use of electronic health records as reminders, patient navigation, community-based campaigns, and mobile computed tomography scanners. We developed an equity-oriented LCS framework and mapped the dimensions and outcomes of the interventions on access to LCS on the basis of approachability, acceptability, availability, affordability, and appropriateness of the intervention. No intervention was mapped across all five dimensions. Most notably, knowledge and implementation gaps were identified in dimensions of acceptability, availability, and affordability. Conclusions Interventions that were most effective in improving access to LCS targeted priority populations, raised community-level awareness, tailored materials for sociocultural acceptability, did not depend on prior patient engagement/registration with the health care system, proactively considered costs related to participation, and enhanced utilization through informed decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ambreen Sayani
- Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Corresponding author. Address for correspondence: Ambreen Sayani, MD, PhD, Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, 76 Grenville St., Toronto, ON M5S 1B2, Canada.
| | - Muhanad Ahmed Ali
- Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Pooja Dey
- Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ann Marie Corrado
- Peter Gilgan Centre for Women’s Cancers, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Carolyn Ziegler
- Library Services, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Aisha Lofters
- Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Peter Gilgan Centre for Women’s Cancers, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lambert LK, Horrill TC, Beck SM, Bourgeois A, Browne AJ, Cheng S, Howard AF, Kaur J, McKenzie M, Stajduhar KI, Thorne S. Health and healthcare equity within the Canadian cancer care sector: a rapid scoping review. Int J Equity Health 2023; 22:20. [PMID: 36709295 PMCID: PMC9883825 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-023-01829-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite a publicly-funded healthcare system, alarming cancer-related health and healthcare inequities persist in Canada. However, it remains unclear how equity is being understood and taken up within the Canadian cancer context. Our objective was to identify how health and healthcare equity are being discussed as goals or aims within the cancer care sector in Canada. METHODS A rapid scoping review was conducted; five biomedical databases, 30 multidisciplinary websites, and Google were searched. We included English-language documents published between 2008 and 2021 that discussed health or healthcare equity in the Canadian cancer context. RESULTS Of 3860 identified documents, 83 were included for full-text analysis. The prevalence of published and grey equity-oriented literature has increased over time (2008-2014 [n = 20]; 2015-2021 [n = 62]). Only 25% of documents (n = 21) included a definition of health equity. Concepts such as inequity, inequality and disparity were frequently used interchangeably, resulting in conceptual muddling. Only 43% of documents (n = 36) included an explicit health equity goal. Although a suite of actions were described across the cancer control continuum to address equity goals, most were framed as recommendations rather than direct interventions. CONCLUSION Health and healthcare equity is a growing priority in the cancer care sector; however, conceptual clarity is needed to guide the development of robust equity goals, and the development of sustainable, measurable actions that redress inequities across the cancer control continuum. If we are to advance health and healthcare equity in the cancer care sector, a coordinated and integrated approach will be required to enact transformative and meaningful change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leah K. Lambert
- Present Address: Nursing and Allied Health Research and Knowledge Translation, BC Cancer, Suite 500, 686 West Broadway, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1G1 Canada ,grid.17091.3e0000 0001 2288 9830School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Tara C. Horrill
- grid.21613.370000 0004 1936 9609College of Nursing, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Scott M. Beck
- Present Address: Nursing and Allied Health Research and Knowledge Translation, BC Cancer, Suite 500, 686 West Broadway, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1G1 Canada
| | - Amber Bourgeois
- Present Address: Nursing and Allied Health Research and Knowledge Translation, BC Cancer, Suite 500, 686 West Broadway, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1G1 Canada ,grid.143640.40000 0004 1936 9465School of Nursing, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada
| | - Annette J. Browne
- grid.17091.3e0000 0001 2288 9830School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | - A. Fuchsia Howard
- grid.17091.3e0000 0001 2288 9830School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Jagbir Kaur
- Present Address: Nursing and Allied Health Research and Knowledge Translation, BC Cancer, Suite 500, 686 West Broadway, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1G1 Canada ,grid.17091.3e0000 0001 2288 9830School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Michael McKenzie
- Radiation Therapy Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada ,grid.17091.3e0000 0001 2288 9830Division of Radiation Oncology and Developmental Radiotherapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Kelli I. Stajduhar
- grid.143640.40000 0004 1936 9465School of Nursing, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada
| | - Sally Thorne
- grid.17091.3e0000 0001 2288 9830School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sayani A, Dilney J, Kuhnke JL, McNeil T. "My Cancer Is Worth Only Fifteen Weeks"? A Critical Analysis of the Lived Experiences of Financial Toxicity and Cancer in Canada. Int J Health Policy Manag 2022; 11:1814-1822. [PMID: 34634872 PMCID: PMC9808211 DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.83] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2020] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer patients experience financial hardship due to rising expenses related to cancer treatment and declining income levels associated with reduced employability. Employment Insurance Sick Benefits (EI-SB) is a social income support program which provides temporary income replacement to Canadians when they fall ill. Although EI-SB is designed to maintain continuity of income during an illness, little is known about the perspectives of cancer patients who receive EI-SB. This knowledge can inform the development of public policies which are responsive to the needs and priorities of cancer patients. METHODS We conducted a theory-informed thematic analysis of data collected from twenty semi-structured interviews with participants who were receiving care in a cancer centre in Cape Breton, Nova Scotia and had received EI-SB. A coding framework was developed using Taplin and colleagues' intermediate outcomes of patient care across the cancer care continuum. Interpretation of findings was guided by the synergies of oppression theoretical lens. RESULTS Three overarching themes describe the experiences of cancer patients receiving social income support: Economic exclusion, in which the structure of the labour market and social welfare system determine access to workplace benefits and continuity of reasonable income; financial toxicity, a vicious cycle of financial burden and increasing financial distress; and constrained choices, where cancer influences employability and lowered income influences the need to be employed. CONCLUSION Cancer patients need income support programs that are tailored to match their healthcare priorities. In addition, policies which strengthen working conditions and facilitate a reintegration to work when possible will be important in addressing the structural drivers of income insecurity experienced by cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ambreen Sayani
- Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jessica Dilney
- Nova Scotia Health Authority, Cape Breton Regional Hospital, Sydney, NS, Canada
| | - Janet L. Kuhnke
- School of Professional Studies, Cape Breton University, Sydney, NS, Canada
| | - Tom McNeil
- Cape Breton Cancer Centre, Sydney, NS, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sayani A, Manthorne J, Nicholson E, Bloch G, Parsons JA, Hwang SW, Amenu B, Freedman H, Rathbone M, Jeji T, Wathen N, Browne AJ, Varcoe C, Lofters A. Toward equity-oriented cancer care: a Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR) protocol to promote equitable access to lung cancer screening. Res Involv Engagem 2022; 8:11. [PMID: 35382905 PMCID: PMC8980795 DOI: 10.1186/s40900-022-00344-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Screening for lung cancer with low dose CT can facilitate the detection of early-stage lung cancers that are amenable to treatment, reducing mortality related to lung cancer. Individuals are considered eligible for lung cancer screening if they meet specific high-risk criteria, such as age and smoking history. Population groups that are at highest risk of lung cancer, and therefore, the target of lung cancer screening interventions, are also the least likely to participate in lung cancer screening. This can lead to a widening of health inequities. Deliberate effort is needed to both reduce lung cancer risk (through upstream interventions that promote smoking cessation) as well as midstream interventions that promote equitable access to lung cancer screening. METHODS This protocol paper describes an equity-informed patient-oriented research study. Our study aims to promote equitable access to lung cancer screening by partnering with patients to co-design an e-learning module for healthcare providers. The learning module will describe the social context of lung cancer risk and promote access to lung cancer screening by increasing equity at the point of care. We have applied the Generative Co-Design Framework for Healthcare Innovation and detail our study processes in three phases and six steps: Pre-design (establishing a study governance structure); Co-design (identifying research priorities, gathering and interpreting data, co-developing module content); and Post-design (pilot testing the module and developing an implementation plan). DISCUSSION Patient engagement in research can promote the design and delivery of healthcare services that are accessible and acceptable to patients. This is particularly important for lung cancer screening as those at highest risk of developing lung cancer are also those who are least likely to participate in lung cancer screening. By detailing the steps of our participatory co-design journey, we are making visible the processes of our work so that they can be linked to future outcomes and related impact, and inform a wide range of patient co-led processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ambreen Sayani
- Transition to Leadership Stream Postdoctoral Fellow at the Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
| | | | | | - Gary Bloch
- St. Michael's Hospital and Inner City Health Associates, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Wellesley Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | - Janet A Parsons
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Physical Therapy, Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Stephen W Hwang
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Bikila Amenu
- Research Advisory Council, Lung Cancer Screening Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research Study, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Howard Freedman
- Research Advisory Council, Lung Cancer Screening Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research Study, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Marlene Rathbone
- Research Advisory Council, Lung Cancer Screening Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research Study, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Tara Jeji
- Research Advisory Council, Lung Cancer Screening Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research Study, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Nadine Wathen
- Arthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, Centre for Research on Health Equity and Social Inclusion, Western University, London, Canada
| | - Annette J Browne
- University of British Columbia School of Nursing, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Colleen Varcoe
- University of British Columbia School of Nursing, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Aisha Lofters
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Women's College Hospital Family Practice Health Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Baggett TP, Barbosa Teixeira J, Rodriguez EC, Anandakugan N, Sporn N, Chang Y, Percac-Lima S, Park ER, Rigotti NA. Patient navigation to promote lung cancer screening in a community health center for people experiencing homelessness: Protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials 2022; 113:106666. [PMID: 34971796 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2021] [Revised: 12/13/2021] [Accepted: 12/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lung cancer is a major cause of death among people experiencing homelessness, with mortality rates more than double those in the general population. Lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) could reduce lung cancer deaths in this population, although the circumstances of homelessness present multiple barriers to LCS LDCT completion. Patient navigation is a promising strategy for overcoming these barriers. METHODS The Investigating Navigation to Help Advance Lung Equity (INHALE) Study is a pragmatic randomized controlled trial of patient navigation for LCS among individuals receiving primary care at Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program (BHCHP). Three hundred BHCHP patients who meet Medicare/Medicaid criteria for LCS will be randomized 2:1 to usual care with (n = 200) or without (n = 100) LCS navigation. Following a structured, theory-based protocol, the patient navigator assists with each step in the LCS process, providing lung cancer education, facilitating shared decision-making visits with primary care providers (PCPs), assisting in making and attending LCS LDCT appointments, arranging follow-up when needed, and offering tobacco cessation support for smokers. The primary outcome is receipt of LCS LDCT at 6 months. Using a sequential explanatory mixed methods approach, qualitative interviews with participants and PCPs will aid in interpreting and contextualizing the trial results. DISCUSSION This trial will produce the first experimental evidence on patient navigation for cancer screening in a homeless health care setting. Results could inform cancer health equity efforts at the 299 Health Care for the Homeless programs that serve over 900,000 patients annually in the US.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Travis P Baggett
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America; Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America; Institute for Research, Quality & Policy in Homeless Health Care, Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program, Boston, MA, United States of America.
| | - Joana Barbosa Teixeira
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Elijah C Rodriguez
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America; New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Nillani Anandakugan
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Nora Sporn
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Yuchiao Chang
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America; Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Sanja Percac-Lima
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America; Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Elyse R Park
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America; Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Nancy A Rigotti
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America; Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Horrill TC, Browne AJ, Stajduhar KI. Equity-Oriented Healthcare: What It Is and Why We Need It in Oncology. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:186-192. [PMID: 35049692 PMCID: PMC8774995 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29010018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2021] [Revised: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 12/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Alarming differences exist in cancer outcomes for people most impacted by persistent and widening health and social inequities. People who are socially disadvantaged often have higher cancer-related mortality and are diagnosed with advanced cancers more often than other people. Such outcomes are linked to the compounding effects of stigma, discrimination, and other barriers, which create persistent inequities in access to care at all points in the cancer trajectory, preventing timely diagnosis and treatment, and further widening the health equity gap. In this commentary, we discuss how growing evidence suggests that people who are considered marginalized are not well-served by the cancer care sector and how the design and structure of services can often impose profound barriers to populations considered socially disadvantaged. We highlight equity-oriented healthcare as one strategy that can begin to address inequities in health outcomes and access to care by taking action to transform organizational cultures and approaches to the design and delivery of cancer services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara C. Horrill
- School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 2B5, Canada;
- Correspondence:
| | - Annette J. Browne
- School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 2B5, Canada;
| | - Kelli I. Stajduhar
- School of Nursing, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada;
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sayani A, Ali MA, Corrado AM, Ziegler C, Sadler A, Williams C, Lofters A. Interventions designed to increase the uptake of lung cancer screening and implications for priority populations: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e050056. [PMID: 34321305 PMCID: PMC8320256 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND When designing any health intervention, it is important to respond to the unequal determinants of health by prioritising the allocation of resources and tailoring interventions based on the disproportionate burden of illness. This approach, called the targeting of priority populations, can prevent a widening of health inequities, particularly those inequities which can be further widened by differences in the uptake of an intervention. The objective of this scoping review is to describe intervention(s) designed to increase the uptake of lung cancer screening, including the health impact on priority populations and to describe knowledge and implementation gaps to inform the design of equitable lung cancer screening. METHODS We will conduct a scoping review following the methodological framework developed by Arksey and O'Malley. We will conduct comprehensive searches for lung cancer screening promotion interventions in Ovid Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health (CINAHL) and Scopus. We will include published English language peer-reviewed and grey literature published between January 2000 and 2020 that describe an intervention designed to increase the uptake of low-dose CT (LDCT) lung cancer screening in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries. Articles not in English or not describing LDCT will be excluded. Three authors will review retrieved literature in three steps: title, abstract and then full text. Three additional authors will review discrepancies. Authors will extract data from full-text papers into a chart adapted from the Template for Intervention Description and Republication checklist, the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials and a Health Equity Impact Assessment tool. Findings will be presented using a narrative synthesis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The knowledge synthesised will be used to inform the equitable design of lung cancer screening and disseminated through conferences, publications and shared with relevant partners. The study does not require research ethics approval as literature is available online.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ambreen Sayani
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- MAP-Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Muhanad Ahmed Ali
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ann Marie Corrado
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Carolyn Ziegler
- Library Services, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alex Sadler
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christina Williams
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aisha Lofters
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- MAP-Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Montagne F, Guisier F, Venissac N, Baste JM. The Role of Surgery in Lung Cancer Treatment: Present Indications and Future Perspectives-State of the Art. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:3711. [PMID: 34359612 PMCID: PMC8345199 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13153711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2021] [Revised: 07/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) are different today, due to the increased use of screening programs and of innovative systemic therapies, leading to the diagnosis of earlier and pre-invasive tumors, and of more advanced and controlled metastatic tumors. Surgery for NSCLC remains the cornerstone treatment when it can be performed. The role of surgery and surgeons has also evolved because surgeons not only perform the initial curative lung cancer resection but they also accompany and follow-up patients from pre-operative rehabilitation, to treatment for recurrences. Surgery is personalized, according to cancer characteristics, including cancer extensions, from pre-invasive and local tumors to locally advanced, metastatic disease, or residual disease after medical treatment, anticipating recurrences, and patients' characteristics. Surgical management is constantly evolving to offer the best oncologic resection adapted to each NSCLC stage. Today, NSCLC can be considered as a chronic disease and surgery is a valuable tool for the diagnosis and treatment of recurrences, and in palliative conditions to relieve dyspnea and improve patients' comfort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- François Montagne
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Calmette Hospital, University Hospital of Lille, Boulevard du Pr. J Leclercq, F-59000 Lille, France; (F.M.); (N.V.)
| | - Florian Guisier
- Department of Pneumology, Rouen University Hospital, 1 rue de Germont, F-76000 Rouen, France;
- Clinical Investigation Center, Rouen University Hospital, CIC INSERM 1404, 1 rue de Germont, F-76000 Rouen, France
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy of Rouen, Normandie University, LITIS QuantIF EA4108, 22 Boulevard Gambetta, F-76183 Rouen, France
| | - Nicolas Venissac
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Calmette Hospital, University Hospital of Lille, Boulevard du Pr. J Leclercq, F-59000 Lille, France; (F.M.); (N.V.)
| | - Jean-Marc Baste
- Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, Rouen University Hospital, 1 rue de Germont, F-76000 Rouen, France
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy of Rouen (UNIROUEN), Normandie University, INSERM U1096, 22 Boulevard Gambetta, F-76000 Rouen, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sayani A, Vahabi M, O’Brien MA, Liu G, Hwang S, Selby P, Nicholson E, Giuliani M, Eng L, Lofters A. Advancing health equity in cancer care: The lived experiences of poverty and access to lung cancer screening. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0251264. [PMID: 33956861 PMCID: PMC8101716 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2021] [Accepted: 04/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Individuals living with low income are more likely to smoke, have a higher risk of lung cancer, and are less likely to participate in preventative healthcare (i.e., low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) for lung cancer screening), leading to equity concerns. To inform the delivery of an organized pilot lung cancer screening program in Ontario, we sought to contextualize the lived experiences of poverty and the choice to participate in lung cancer screening. Methods At three Toronto academic primary-care clinics, high-risk screen-eligible patients who chose or declined LDCT screening were consented; sociodemographic data was collected. Qualitative interviews were conducted. Theoretical thematic analysis was used to organize, describe and interpret the data using the morphogenetic approach as a guiding theoretical lens. Results Eight participants chose to undergo screening; ten did not. From interviews, we identified three themes: Pathways of disadvantage (social trajectories of events that influence lung-cancer risk and health-seeking behaviour), lung-cancer risk and early detection (upstream factors that shape smoking behaviour and lung-cancer screening choices), and safe spaces of care (care that is free of bias, conflict, criticism, or potentially threatening actions, ideas or conversations). We illuminate how ‘choice’ is contextual to the availability of material resources such as income and housing, and how ‘choice’ is influenced by having access to spaces of care that are free of judgement and personal bias. Conclusion Underserved populations will require multiprong interventions that work at the individual, system and structural level to reduce inequities in lung-cancer risk and access to healthcare services such as cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ambreen Sayani
- Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- * E-mail:
| | - Mandana Vahabi
- Daphne Cockwell School of Nursing, Ryerson University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mary Ann O’Brien
- Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Geoffrey Liu
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stephen Hwang
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Peter Selby
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Campbell Family Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Erika Nicholson
- Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Lawson Eng
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aisha Lofters
- Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|