Injections frequency and health care costs in patients treated with aflibercept compared to ranibizumab: new real-life evidence from Switzerland

Do published trial results influence physician prescribing patterns? Intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor usage by the United States Ophthalmologists before and after Protocol T study

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Clinical trial publications may influence physician prescribing patterns. The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network (DRCR.net) Protocol T study, published in 2015, examined outcomes of intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) medications for treatment of diabetic macular oedema (DME). This study investigates if the Protocol T 1-year results were associated with changes in prescribing patterns.

RECENT FINDINGS

Anti-VEGF agents have revolutionized treatment of DME by blocking angiogenesis signalled by VEGF. Three commonly used anti-VEGF agents are on-label aflibercept (Eylea, Regeneron) and ranibizumab (Lucentis, Genentech) and off-label bevacizumab (Avastin, Genentech).

SUMMARY

From 2013 to 2018, there was a significant positive trend in the average number of aflibercept injections for any indication ( P  < 0.002). There was no significant trend in the average number of bevacizumab ( P  = 0.09) and ranibizumab ( P  = 0.43) for any indication. The mean proportion of aflibercept injections per provider per year was 0.181, 0.217, 0.311, 0.403, 0.419 and 0.427; each year-by-year comparison was significant (all P  < 0.001), and the largest increase was in 2015, the year of publication of Protocol T 1-year results. These results imply and reinforce that clinical trial publications may have significant effects on ophthalmologist prescribing patterns.

The economics of vision impairment and its leading causes: A systematic review

Vision impairment (VI) can have wide ranging economic impact on individuals, households, and health systems. The aim of this systematic review was to describe and summarise the costs associated with VI and its major causes. We searched MEDLINE (16 November 2019), National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database, the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects and the Health Technology Assessment database (12 December 2019) for partial or full economic evaluation studies, published between 1 January 2000 and the search dates, reporting cost data for participants with VI due to an unspecified cause or one of the seven leading causes globally: cataract, uncorrected refractive error, diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration, corneal opacity, trachoma. The search was repeated on 20 January 2022 to identify studies published since our initial search. Included studies were quality appraised using the British Medical Journal Checklist for economic submissions adapted for cost of illness studies. Results were synthesized in a structured narrative. Of the 138 included studies, 38 reported cost estimates for VI due to an unspecified cause and 100 reported costs for one of the leading causes. These 138 studies provided 155 regional cost estimates. Fourteen studies reported global data; 103/155 (66%) regional estimates were from high-income countries. Costs were most commonly reported using a societal (n = 48) or healthcare system perspective (n = 25). Most studies included only a limited number of cost components. Large variations in methodology and reporting across studies meant cost estimates varied considerably. The average quality assessment score was 78% (range 35-100%); the most common weaknesses were the lack of sensitivity analysis and insufficient disaggregation of costs. There was substantial variation across studies in average treatment costs per patient for most conditions, including refractive error correction (range $12-$201 ppp), cataract surgery (range $54-$3654 ppp), glaucoma (range $351-$1354 ppp) and AMD (range $2209-$7524 ppp). Future cost estimates of the economic burden of VI and its major causes will be improved by the development and adoption of a reference case for eye health. This could then be used in regular studies, particularly in countries with data gaps, including low- and middle-income countries in Asia, Eastern Europe, Oceania, Latin America and sub-Saharan Africa.

Therapy of Age-related Exudative Macular Degeneration with Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Drugs: An Italian Real Life Study

Aim:

To evaluate the real utilization of ranibizumab and aflibercept in the daily management of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treated at the Eye Clinic of Campania University L.Vanvitelli.

Background:

Therapy with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor represents the gold standard in wet age-related macular degeneration. There are nonreal life italian studies of this therapy in the literature.

Objective:

To analyze in our sample the post-therapy variations of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) observed at the end of a 12-month follow-up period.

Methods:

This real-life study analyzes 109 patients that underwent monthly checks for the first 4 months and then every 2 months until the end of the 12-month follow-up. The sample was first analyzed in its entirety, subsequently subdivided into 3 groups based on baseline BCVA, age, and the number of intravitreal injections performed, in order to identify possible predictive elements of the anti-VEGF response.

Results:

On average, patients underwent 4.16 ± 1.58 intravitreal anti-VEGF injections in 1 year. At the end of the 12-month follow-up, the patients’ average BCVA increased from 33.01 letters to 33.75 letters (+0.74 ± 9,4 letters), while the average CRT decreased from 346.86 µm to 265.39 µm (-81.47 ± 121 µm).

Conclusion:

The study shows the efficacy of anti-VEGF therapy in the stabilization of BCVA in nAMD, confirming the differences in visual outcomes compared to clinical trials, mainly for economic-organizational reasons.

Treatment patterns in patients with age-related macular degeneration and diabetic macular edema: A real-world claims analysis in Dubai

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the pattern of approved anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatments among patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and diabetic macular edema (DME) in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

METHOD

This was a retrospective, nonrandomized, observational cohort analysis of the Dubai Real-world Claims Database with a 360-day follow-up period. Adult patients diagnosed with nAMD or DME treated with ranibizumab or aflibercept for the first time were included. The primary objective was to evaluate anti-VEGF treatment patterns with respect to the proportion of patients receiving ranibizumab and aflibercept for nAMD and DME separately.

RESULTS

Of the 451 patients included in the final study cohort, 83.6% and 16.4% had a diagnosis of DME (ranibizumab: 48.5%; aflibercept: 51.5%) and nAMD (ranibizumab: 40.5%; aflibercept: 59.5%), respectively, at baseline. Treatment frequency of ranibizumab/aflibercept was similar for nAMD (mean: 2.4/2.9 injections; p = 0.2389) with fewer injections in the ranibizumab cohort for DME (mean: 1.9/2.5 injections; p = 0.0002). Most patients received ≤3 anti-VEGF injections during the 360-day follow-up period. The time between consecutive treatments was large (nAMD: 73.6 days/10.5 weeks; DME: 80.5 days/11.5 weeks). Approximately 10%-13.5% of patients switched their anti-VEGF therapy. Most patients (83.8%) had a diabetes diagnosis during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

This real-world study provides an initial understanding of anti-VEGF treatment patterns in patients with nAMD and DME in the UAE. Treatment frequency of the 2 anti-VEGF agents assessed was similar in both patient populations. Both treatments were infrequently administered with large dosing intervals.

Effect of Repeated Intravitreal Ranibizumab and Aflibercept Injections on the Cornea in Patients with Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Purpose

To assess the effect of repeated intravitreal ranibizumab injections (RI) and aflibercept injections (AI) on the corneal endothelium and central corneal thickness (CCT) in patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

Materials and Methods

In the retrospective study, 110 eyes of 106 patients, aged 52 to 93 years, were analyzed. Fifty eyes were treated only with RI (I group), and 60 eyes were treated only with AI (II group). Every patient received one intravitreal injection of 0.5 mg of ranibizumab once a month or 2 mg of aflibercept for 3 subsequent months. Each patient received only 3 injections during the whole observation period. Corneal analysis was obtained with the specular microscope. Examinations were performed before initial treatment, after each injection, and 6 months after the first injection. Analysis included corneal endothelial cell density (ECD), hexagonal cell percentage (% Hex), coefficient of variation (CoV), and CCT.

Results

There was a statistically significant ECD loss, regardless of the type of the anti-VEGF agent. The mean ECD value in the I group was 2397 ± 459 cells/mm² before RI, 2389 ± 459 cells/mm² after the first RI, 2386 ± 467 cells/mm² after the second RI, 2378 ± 475 cells/mm² after the third RI, and 2357 ± 460 cells/mm² 6 months after the first RI. The mean ECD value in the II group was 2448 ± 493 cells/mm² before treatment, 2456 ± 498 cells/mm² after the first AI, 2426 ± 496 cells/mm² after the second AI, 2402 ± 488 cells/mm² after the third AI, and 2348 ± 473 cells/mm² 6 months after the first AI. In comparison with the group treated with RI, the group treated with AI presented a greater ECD loss at each measuring point. The percentage of hexagonal cells was decreased in both groups. There was a slight increase in polymegathism in both treated groups. Ranibizumab proved to cause a small increase in CCT, while CCT remained unchanged in the aflibercept group.

Conclusions

Repeated intravitreal injections of 0.5 mg of ranibizumab or 2 mg of aflibercept can influence the morphology of the corneal endothelium but not CCT.

Role of inflammatory factors in the effects of aflibercept or ranibizumab treatment for alleviating wet age-associated macular degeneration

Aflibercept and ranibizumab are novel drugs for effectively treating wet age-associated macular degeneration (AMD). In the present study, the effect of aflibercept and ranibizumab on wet AMD was compared. A total of 80 AMD patients were intravitreously treated with aflibercept (2.0 mg/dose, 40 participants) or ranibizumab (0.3 mg/dose, 40 participants). The mean visual acuity and central subfield thickness (CTS) were determined at baseline and each follow-up visit (every 4 weeks). ELISA was used to detect the expression of transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1) and interleukin 6 (IL-6). The primary outcome was the mean change in visual acuity letter score (VAS) and CTS at 1 year. The VAS was markedly improved by 13.1 in the aflibercept group and by 11.0 in the ranibizumab group. In a subgroup of patients with an initial VAS of <69, the mean improvement in the VAS was 17.7 in the aflibercept group and 13.2 in the ranibizumab group (P<0.01). The mean CTS was markedly decreased by 141 in the aflibercept group and by 134 in the ranibizumab group. In the subgroup of patients with an initial VAS of <69, the mean CTS was decreased by 171 in the aflibercept group and by 154 in the ranibizumab group (P<0.01). However, the change of VAS and CTS was similar between the ranibizumab and aflibercept groups when the initial VAS was ≥69. No significant differences in serious adverse events were identified between the aflibercept and ranibizumab groups. The levels of TGF-β1, IL-6 and MCP-1 were decreased by the aflibercept and ranibizumab treatments. The decrease in the levels of the inflammatory factors was more obvious in patients with an initial VAS of <69 in comparison with that in patients with an initial VAS of ≥69. Negative correlations between the levels of TGF-β1, MCP-1 and IL-6 and the mean change of VAS when patients were treated with aflibercept or ranibizumab were identified among all ages. Positive correlations between the levels of TGF-β1, MCP-1 and IL-6 and the mean change of CTS were observed when the initial VAS of the patients was <69. In conclusion, the efficacy of aflibercept in treating patients with AMD was better than that of ranibizumab when the initial VAS of the patients was <69. The inhibition of inflammatory factors may be a secondary effect of aflibercept and ranibizumab treatment. The present study provides a useful reference for the clinical treatment of wet AMD (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry no. ChiCTR1800017782).

Remodeling of Retinal Architecture in Diabetic Retinopathy: Disruption of Ocular Physiology and Visual Functions by Inflammatory Gene Products and Pyroptosis

Diabetic patients suffer from a host of physiological abnormalities beyond just those of glucose metabolism. These abnormalities often lead to systemic inflammation via modulation of several inflammation-related genes, their respective gene products, homocysteine metabolism, and pyroptosis. The very nature of this homeostatic disruption re-sets the overall physiology of diabetics via upregulation of immune responses, enhanced retinal neovascularization, upregulation of epigenetic events, and disturbances in cells' redox regulatory system. This altered pathophysiological milieu can lead to the development of diabetic retinopathy (DR), a debilitating vision-threatening eye condition with microvascular complications. DR is the most prevalent cause of irreversible blindness in the working-age adults throughout the world as it can lead to severe structural and functional remodeling of the retina, decreasing vision and thus diminishing the quality of life. In this manuscript, we attempt to summarize recent developments and new insights to explore the very nature of this intertwined crosstalk between components of the immune system and their metabolic orchestrations to elucidate the pathophysiology of DR. Understanding the multifaceted nature of the cellular and molecular factors that are involved in DR could reveal new targets for effective diagnostics, therapeutics, prognostics, preventive tools, and finally strategies to combat the development and progression of DR in susceptible subjects.