The effects of extracellular contrast agent (Gadobutrol) on the precision and reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking

The effects of flip angle and gadolinium contrast agent on single breath-hold compressed sensing cardiac magnetic resonance cine for biventricular global strain assessment

Background

Due to its potential to significantly reduce scanning time while delivering accurate results for cardiac volume function, compressed sensing (CS) has gained traction in cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) cine. However, further investigation is necessary to explore its feasibility and impact on myocardial strain results.

Materials and methods

A total of 102 participants [75 men, 46.5 ± 17.1 (SD) years] were included in this study. Each patient underwent four consecutive cine sequences with the same slice localization, including the reference multi-breath-hold balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFPref) cine, the CS cine with the same flip angle as bSSFPref before (CS45) and after (eCS45) contrast enhancement, and the CS cine (eCS70) with a 70-degree flip angle after contrast enhancement. Biventricular strain parameters were derived from cine images. Two-tailed paired t-tests were used for data analysis.

Results

Global radial strain (GRS), global circumferential strain (GCS), and global longitudinal strain (GLS) were observed to be significantly lower in comparison to those obtained from bSSFPref sequences for both the right and left ventricles (all p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed on biventricular GRS-LAX (long-axis) and GLS values derived from enhanced and unenhanced CS cine sequences with the same flip angle, but remarkable reductions were noted in GRS-SAX (short-axis) and GCS values (p < 0.001). After contrast injection, a larger flip angle caused a significant elevation in left ventricular strain results (p < 0.001) but did not affect the right ventricle. The increase in flip angle appeared to compensate for contrast agent affection on left ventricular GRS-SAX, GCS values, and right ventricular GRS-LAX, GLS values.

Conclusion

Despite incorporating gadolinium contrast agents and applying larger flip angles, single breath-hold CS cine sequences consistently yielded diminished strain values for both ventricles when compared with conventional cine sequences. Prior to employing this single breath-hold CS cine sequence to refine the clinical CMR examination procedure, it is crucial to consider its impact on myocardial strain results.

Comparison between pre- and post-contrast cardiac MRI cine images: the impact on ventricular volume and strain measurement

To explore whether contrast agent administration will affect ventricular volume and strain parameters measured on cardiac magnetic resonance cine images. This prospective study enrolled 88 patients, including 32 patients with cardiac amyloidosis (CA), 32 patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), and 24 control participants, to perform steady-state free precession (SSFP)-cine imaging twice, respectively before and after contrast agent injection. Indexed left and right ventricular (LV and RV) volume and LV strain parameters (peak radial strain [PRS], peak circumferential strain [PCS], peak longitudinal strain [PLS]) were analyzed and compared between the pre- and post-contrast cine groups. Compared to the group of pre-contrast cine, the end-diastolic volume index (EDVi) and end-systolic volume index (ESVi) significantly increased in the group using post-contrast cine images (all p < 0.05), especially in the right ventricle. After contrast injection, the right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) decreased significantly (p < 0.05), while the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) only reduced for patients with HCM (p < 0.05). The PRS (37.1 ± 15.2 vs. 32.0 ± 15.4, p < 0.001) and PCS (- 14.9 ± 4.3 vs. - 14.0 ± 4.1, p < 0.001) derived from post-contrast cine images reduced significantly in all patients and this tendency remained in subgroup analysis except for PCS in the control group. The administration of a contrast agent may influence the measurements of ventricular volume and strain. Acquiring pre-contrast cine images were suggested for patients who required more accurate right ventricle evaluation or precise strain assessment.

Impact of Right Ventricular Trabeculation on Right Ventricular Function in Patients With Left Ventricular Non-compaction Phenotype

Right ventricular (RV) involvement in left ventricular (LV) non-compaction (LVNC) remains unknown. We aimed to describe the RV volumetric, functional, and strain characteristics and clinical features of patients with LVNC phenotype and good LV ejection fraction (EF) using cardiac magnetic resonance to characterize RV trabeculation in LVNC and to study the relationships of RV and LV trabeculation with RV volume and function. This retrospective study included 100 Caucasian patients with LVNC phenotype and good LV-EF and 100 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. Patients were further divided into two subgroups according to RV indexed trabecular mass [RV-TMi; patients with RV hypertrabeculation (RV-HT) vs. patients with normal RV trabeculation (RV-NT)]. We measured the LV and RV volumetric, functional, and TMi values using threshold-based postprocessing software and the RV and LV strain values using feature tracking and collected the patients' LVNC-related clinical features. Patients had higher RV volumes, lower RV-EF, and worse RV strain values than controls. A total of 22% of patients had RV-TMi values above the reference range; furthermore, RV-HT patients had higher RV and LV volumes, lower RV- and LV-EF, and worse RV strain values than RV-NT patients. We identified a strong positive correlation between RV- and LV-TMi and between RV-TMi and RV volumes and a significant inverse relationship of both RV- and LV-TMi with RV function. The prevalence of LVNC-related clinical features was similar in the RV-HT and RV-NT groups. These results suggest that some patients with LVNC phenotype might have RV non-compaction with subclinical RV dysfunction and without more severe clinical features.

Left ventricular characteristics of noncompaction phenotype patients with good ejection fraction measured with cardiac magnetic resonance

OBJECTIVE

We describe left ventricular (LV) volumes, myocardial and trabeculated muscle mass and strains with Cardiac magnetic resonance of a large cohort (n=81) who fulfilled the morphologic criteria of left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) and had good ejection fraction (EF >55%) and compare them with healthy controls (n=81). Male and female patients were compared to matched controls and to each other. We also investigated the LV trabeculated muscle mass cutoff in male and female patients with LVNC.

METHODS

81 participants with LVNC and 81 healthy controls were included. Male and female patients were compared to matched controls and to each other. We also investigated the left ventricular trabeculated muscle mass cut-off in male and female LVNC patients.

RESULTS

The LV parameters of the LVNC population were normal, but they had significantly higher volumes, myocardial and trabeculated muscle mass, and a significantly smaller EF than the controls. Similar differences were observed after stratifying by sex. The optimal LV trabeculated muscle mass cutoffs were 25.8 g/m2 in men (area under the curve: 0.81) and 19.0 g/m2 in women (area under the curve: 0.87). The patients had normal global strains but a significantly worse global circumferential strain (patients vs controls: -29.9±4.9 vs. -35.8±4.7%, p<0.05) and significantly higher circumferential mechanical dispersion than the controls (patients vs. controls: 7.6±4.2 vs. 6.1±2.8%; p<0.05). No disease-related strain differences were noted between men and women.

CONCLUSION

The LV functional and strain characteristics of the LVNC cohort differed significantly from those of healthy participants; this might be caused by increased LV trabeculation, and its clinical relevance might be questionable. The LV trabeculated muscle mass was very different between men and women; thus, the use of sex-specific morphologic diagnostic criteria should be considered.

Comparison between conventional and compressed sensing cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for feature tracking global circumferential strain assessment

BACKGROUND

Feature tracking (FT) has become an established tool for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)-based strain analysis. Recently, the compressed sensing (CS) technique has been applied to cine CMR, which has drastically reduced its acquisition time. However, the effects of CS imaging on FT strain analysis need to be carefully studied. This study aimed to investigate the use of CS cine CMR for FT strain analysis compared to conventional cine CMR.

METHODS

Sixty-five patients with different left ventricular (LV) pathologies underwent both retrospective conventional cine CMR and prospective CS cine CMR using a prototype sequence with the comparable temporal and spatial resolution at 3 T. Eight short-axis cine images covering the entire LV were obtained and used for LV volume assessment and FT strain analysis. Prospective CS cine CMR data over 1.5 heartbeats were acquired to capture the complete end-diastolic data between the first and second heartbeats. LV volume assessment and FT strain analysis were performed using a dedicated software (ci42; Circle Cardiovasacular Imaging, Calgary, Canada), and the global circumferential strain (GCS) and GCS rate were calculated from both cine CMR sequences.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the GCS (- 17.1% [- 11.7, - 19.5] vs. - 16.1% [- 11.9, - 19.3; p = 0.508) and GCS rate (- 0.8 [- 0.6, - 1.0] vs. - 0.8 [- 0.7, - 1.0]; p = 0.587) obtained using conventional and CS cine CMR. The GCS obtained using both methods showed excellent agreement (y = 0.99x - 0.24; r = 0.95; p < 0.001). The Bland-Altman analysis revealed that the mean difference in the GCS between the conventional and CS cine CMR was 0.1% with limits of agreement between -2.8% and 3.0%. No significant differences were found in all LV volume assessment between both types of cine CMR.

CONCLUSION

CS cine CMR could be used for GCS assessment by CMR-FT as well as conventional cine CMR. This finding further enhances the clinical utility of high-speed CS cine CMR imaging.

Changes in strain parameters at different deterioration levels of left ventricular function: A cardiac magnetic resonance feature-tracking study of patients with left ventricular noncompaction

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of cardiac MRI information on left ventricular (LV) strain and rotational parameters of left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) patients with reduced ejection fraction (EF). Thus, we sought to use feature tracking (FT) to describe these changes at different levels of EF deterioration.

METHODS

We included 31 adult LVNC patients with reduced LV EF (Group B, EF < 50%) without any comorbidities or concomitant cardiac diseases, 31 age- and sex-matched LVNC patients with good EF (Group A, EF > 50%) and 31 healthy controls. Group B was divided according to LV EF into two subgroups (Group B-1: EF 35-50%, Group B-2: EF < 35%). Their global longitudinal, circumferential (GCS), and radial (GRS) strains; LV segmental strains; LV apical and basal rotation values; and patterns and degree of LV dyssynchrony were measured.

RESULTS

All of the global and mean segmental strain parameters were significantly worse in Groups B, B-1 and B-2 than in Group A and in the controls. The LV mechanical dispersion increased as LV EF decreased. The degree of apical rotation was the highest in the control group, almost the same in Group A and the lowest and in the reverse direction in Group B-2. A rotational pattern, clockwise-directed rigid body rotation (RBR), was found in 39% of the Group B patients, and a counterclockwise-directed RBR was found in 26% of the Group A patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The strain values and rotational parameters changed as the EF decreased. These changes affected the global LV, and we did not identify an LVNC-specific strain pattern.

Feature-tracking-based strain analysis - a comparison of tracking algorithms

PURPOSE

Optical flow feature-tracking (FT) strain assessment is increasingly being employed scientifically and clinically. Several software packages, employing different algorithms, enable computation of FT-derived strains. The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of the underlying algorithm on the validity and robustness of FT-derived strain results.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

CSPAMM and SSFP cine sequences were acquired in 30 subjects (15 patients with aortic stenosis and associated secondary hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and 15 controls) in identical midventricular short-axis locations. Global peak systolic circumferential strain (PSCS) was calculated using tagging and feature-tracking software with different algorithms (non-rigid, elastic image registration, and blood myocardial border tracing). Intermodality agreement and intra- as well inter-observer variability were assessed.

RESULTS

Intermodality/inter-algorithm comparison for global PSCS using Friedman's test revealed statistically significant differences (tagging vs. blood myocardial border tracing algorithm). Intermodality assessment revealed the highest correlation between tagging and non-rigid, elastic image registration (r = 0.84), while correlation between tagging and blood myocardial border tracing (r = 0.36) and between the two feature-tracking software packages (r = 0.5) were considerably lower.

CONCLUSIONS

The type of algorithm employed during feature-tracking strain assessment has a significant impact on the results. The non-rigid, elastic image registration algorithm produces more precise and reproducible results than the blood myocardium tracing algorithm.

Left ventricular global myocardial strain assessment: Are CMR feature-tracking algorithms useful in the clinical setting?

OBJECTIVES

Myocardial strains can be calculated using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) feature-tracking (FT) algorithms. They show excellent intra- and inter-observer agreement but rather disappointing inter-vendor agreement. Currently, it is unknown how well CMR-FT-based strain values agree with manually obtained strain values.

METHODS

In 45 subjects (15 controls, 15 acute myocardial infarction, 15 non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy), end-systolic manually derived strains were compared to four CMR-FT software packages. Global radial strain (GRS), global circumferential strain (GCS) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) were determined. Intra- and inter-observer agreement and agreement between manual and CMR-FT analysis were calculated. Statistical analysis included Bland-Altman plots, intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CV).

RESULTS

Manual contouring yielded excellent intra-observer (ICC 0.903 (GRS) to 0.995 (GCS)) and inter-observer agreement (ICC 0.915 (GRS) to 0.966 (GCS)) with CV ranging 4.7% (GCS) to 20.7% (GRS) and 12.7% (GCS) to 20.0% (GRS), for intra-observer and inter-observer agreement, respectively. Agreement between manual and CMR-FT strain values ranged from poor to excellent, with best agreement for GCS (ICC 0.857-0.935) and intermediate for GLS (ICC 0.591-0.914), while ICC values for GRS ranged widely (ICC 0.271-0.851). In particular, two software packages showed a strong trend toward systematic underestimation of myocardial strain in radial and longitudinal direction, correlating poorly to moderately with manual contouring, i.e., GRS (ICC 0.271, CV 25.2%) and GLS (ICC 0.591, CV 17.6%).

CONCLUSION

Some CMR-FT values agree poorly with manually derived strains, emphasizing to be cautious to use these software packages in the clinical setting. In particular, radial and longitudinal strain tends to be underestimated when using manually derived strains as reference.

The effect of contrast agents on left ventricular parameters calculated by a threshold-based software module: does it truly matter?

The acquisition of short-axis (SA) cine magnetic resonance (MR) images after the administration of contrast agent (CA) is a common, time-saving technique, but a decreased difference in the blood-myocardium contrast on these steady-state free precession (SSFP) cine scans could change the calculated parameters when using threshold-based papillary and trabecular muscle (PTM) quantification. We studied the effect of CA on the parameters calculated from pre- and post-CA SA cine images in noncompaction cardiomyopathy (NC-CMP) and healthy (H) participants using a threshold-based module. A total of 39 individuals (20 patients and 19 healthy) were included prospectively in this study. After the pre-CA SA images were acquired, i.v. gadobutrol (GA) or gadobenate dimeglumine (GD) (GA vs. GD: NC-CMP = 12 vs. 8; C = 12 vs. 7) was administered, and SA scans were repeated after two minutes. A threshold-based PTM software was used for postprocessing. Pre-CA and post-CA SA images were analyzed, and the parameters were compared in both the NC-CMP and H groups. The left ventricular volumes were significantly larger, while the left ventricular myocardial (LVmass) and trabecular mass (LVtrab) values were significantly smaller on the post-CA scans (NC-CMP: pre-CA vs. post-CA, EDV: 74.0 ± 13.6 vs. 81.1 ± 16.3 ml/m², ESV: 25.3 ± 7.3 vs. 30.1 ± 11.2 ml/m², LVmass-ED: 82.5 ± 17.5 vs. 75.7 ± 15.9 g/m², LVtrab-ED: 25.0 ± 6.6 vs. 18.9 ± 4.7 g/m²; Healthy: preCA vs. post-CA, EDV: 69.7 ± 11.9 vs. 72.2  ±  10.7 ml/m², ESV: 22.6 ± 5.7 vs. 23.9 ± 6.3 ml/m², LVmass-ED: 71.3 ± 13.6 vs. 68.7 ± 13.9 g/m², LVtrab-ED: 19.4 ± 2.6 vs. 16.2 ± 3.0 g/m²; p < 0.05). The decreased blood-myocardium contrast difference on post-CA SSFP SA cine images leads to altered cardiac parameters when using threshold-based software for evaluation.

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2017

There were 106 articles published in the Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (JCMR) in 2017, including 92 original research papers, 3 reviews, 9 technical notes, and 1 Position paper, 1 erratum and 1 correction. The volume was similar to 2016 despite an increase in manuscript submissions to 405 and thus reflects a slight decrease in the acceptance rate to 26.7%. The quality of the submissions continues to be high. The 2017 JCMR Impact Factor (which is published in June 2018) was minimally lower at 5.46 (vs. 5.71 for 2016; as published in June 2017), which is the second highest impact factor ever recorded for JCMR. The 2017 impact factor means that an average, each JCMR paper that were published in 2015 and 2016 was cited 5.46 times in 2017.In accordance with Open-Access publishing of Biomed Central, the JCMR articles are published on-line in continuus fashion and in the chronologic order of acceptance, with no collating of the articles into sections or special thematic issues. For this reason, over the years, the Editors have felt that it is useful to annually summarize the publications into broad areas of interest or theme, so that readers can view areas of interest in a single article in relation to each other and other contemporary JCMR articles. In this publication, the manuscripts are presented in broad themes and set in context with related literature and previously published JCMR papers to guide continuity of thought within the journal. In addition, I have elected to use this format to convey information regarding the editorial process to the readership.I hope that you find the open-access system increases wider reading and citation of your papers, and that you will continue to send your very best, high quality manuscripts to JCMR for consideration. I thank our very dedicated Associate Editors, Guest Editors, and Reviewers for their efforts to ensure that the review process occurs in a timely and responsible manner and that the JCMR continues to be recognized as the forefront journal of our field. And finally, I thank you for entrusting me with the editorship of the JCMR as I begin my 3rd year as your editor-in-chief. It has been a tremendous learning experience for me and the opportunity to review manuscripts that reflect the best in our field remains a great joy and highlight of my week!

The effects of flip angle optimization on the precision and reproducibility of feature tracking derived strain assessment in contrast enhanced bSSFP cine images

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate whether a flip angle adaptation, which is known to improve SNR and CNR in post contrast SSFP imaging, improves the precision and reproducibility of Feature Tracking (FT) derived strain assessments in post contrast bSSFP imaging.

METHODS AND RESULTS

At 1.5T balanced SSFP midventricular short axis cine images were acquired with various flip angles (FA) before (FA = 50°) and 5 min after (FAs = 50°, 80°, 90°, 100°) injection of double dose Gadobutrol. FT derived systolic circumferential strain was then calculated for all pre- and post-contrast images, the intra- and inter-observer variability of strain measurements was assessed. FT derived midventricular peak systolic circumferential strain (PSCS) derived from unadapted (FA: 50°) contrast enhanced bSSFP images was significantly lower than strain derived from unenhanced bSSFP images (-16.45 ± 5.1% vs -20.57 ± 6.2%; p < 0.001) and showed low agreement (mean difference of -4.13 ± 2.4, 95% CI:-5.3 to -3) in all 20 subjects. After adaption of the flip angle (FA: 100°), agreement between strain derived from unenhanced and adapted contrast enhanced bSSFP images (-20.57 ± 6%) was strong (0.01 ± 0.9, CI:-0.43 to 0.41). In comparison to intra- and interobserver variability of strain derived from unenhanced images (intra 2.9%; inter: 3.9%), strain measurements derived from adapted contrast enhanced images (FA: 100°) showed a slightly lower variability (intra: 2.5%; inter: 2.3%).

CONCLUSION

If flip angle adaptation is performed, FT based strain analysis may be performed on contrast enhanced bSSFP cine images without loss of precision and accuracy.

Influence of observer experience on cardiac magnetic resonance strain measurements using feature tracking and conventional tagging

Aim

CMR quantitative myocardial strain analysis is increasingly being utilized in clinical routine. CMR feature tracking (FT) is now considered an alternative to the reference standard for strain assessment -CMR tagging. The impact of observer experience on the validity of FT results has not yet been investigated. The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the observer experience-dependency of CMR FT and to compare results with the reference standard.

Methods

CSPAMM and SSFP-Cine sequences were acquired in 38 individuals (19 patients with HFpEF,19 controls) in identical midventricular short-axis locations. Global peak systolic circumferential strain (PSCS) together with LV ejection fraction (EF) and volumes were assessed by three observers (5,3 and 0 years of CMR-strain experience). Intermodality, intra- as well inter-observer variability were assessed.

Results

Correlation between tagging and FT derived PSCS depended on observer experience (r = 0.69, r = 0.58 and r = 0.53). For the inexperienced observer tagging and FT derived PSCS differed significantly (p = 0.0061). Intra-observer reproducibility of tagging derived PSCS were similar for all observers (coefficient of variation (CV): 6%, 6.8% and 4.9%) while reproducibility of FT derived PSCS (CV: 7.4%, 9.4% and 15.8%) varied depending on observer experience. Inter-observer reproducibility of tagging derived PSCS for observer 1 and 2 as well as 1 and 3 for tagging (CV: 6.17%, 9.18%) was superior in comparison to FT (CV: 11.8%, 16.4%).

Conclusions

Reliability and accuracy of FT based strain analysis, more than tagging based strain analysis, is dependent on reader experience. CMR strain experience or dedicated training in strain evaluation is necessary for FT to deliver accurate strain data, comparable to that of CMR tagging.

Review of Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (JCMR) 2015-2016 and transition of the JCMR office to Boston

The Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (JCMR) is the official publication of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR). In 2016, the JCMR published 93 manuscripts, including 80 research papers, 6 reviews, 5 technical notes, 1 protocol, and 1 case report. The number of manuscripts published was similar to 2015 though with a 12% increase in manuscript submissions to an all-time high of 369. This reflects a decrease in the overall acceptance rate to <25% (excluding solicited reviews). The quality of submissions to JCMR continues to be high. The 2016 JCMR Impact Factor (which is published in June 2016 by Thomson Reuters) was steady at 5.601 (vs. 5.71 for 2015; as published in June 2016), which is the second highest impact factor ever recorded for JCMR. The 2016 impact factor means that the JCMR papers that were published in 2014 and 2015 were on-average cited 5.71 times in 2016.In accordance with Open-Access publishing of Biomed Central, the JCMR articles are published on-line in the order that they are accepted with no collating of the articles into sections or special thematic issues. For this reason, over the years, the Editors have felt that it is useful to annually summarize the publications into broad areas of interest or themes, so that readers can view areas of interest in a single article in relation to each other and other recent JCMR articles. The papers are presented in broad themes with previously published JCMR papers to guide continuity of thought in the journal. In addition, I have elected to open this publication with information for the readership regarding the transition of the JCMR editorial office to the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston and the editorial process.Though there is an author publication charge (APC) associated with open-access to cover the publisher's expenses, this format provides a much wider distribution/availability of the author's work and greater manuscript citation. For SCMR members, there is a substantial discount in the APC. I hope that you will continue to send your high quality manuscripts to JCMR for consideration. Importantly, I also ask that you consider referencing recent JCMR publications in your submissions to the JCMR and elsewhere as these contribute to our impact factor. I also thank our dedicated Associate Editors, Guest Editors, and reviewers for their many efforts to ensure that the review process occurs in a timely and responsible manner and that the JCMR continues to be recognized as the leading publication in our field.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Myocardial Strain After Acute ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review

The purpose of this systematic review is to provide a clinically relevant, disease-based perspective on myocardial strain imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction or stable ischemic heart disease. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging uniquely integrates myocardial function with pathology. Therefore, this review focuses on strain imaging with cardiac magnetic resonance. We have specifically considered the relationships between left ventricular (LV) strain, infarct pathologies, and their associations with prognosis. A comprehensive literature review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Publications were identified that (1) described the relationship between strain and infarct pathologies, (2) assessed the relationship between strain and subsequent LV outcomes, and (3) assessed the relationship between strain and health outcomes. In patients with acute myocardial infarction, circumferential strain predicts the recovery of LV systolic function in the longer term. The prognostic value of longitudinal strain is less certain. Strain differentiates between infarcted versus noninfarcted myocardium, even in patients with stable ischemic heart disease with preserved LV ejection fraction. Strain recovery is impaired in infarcted segments with intramyocardial hemorrhage or microvascular obstruction. There are practical limitations to measuring strain with cardiac magnetic resonance in the acute setting, and knowledge gaps, including the lack of data showing incremental value in clinical practice. Critically, studies of cardiac magnetic resonance strain imaging in patients with ischemic heart disease have been limited by sample size and design. Strain imaging has potential as a tool to assess for early or subclinical changes in LV function, and strain is now being included as a surrogate measure of outcome in therapeutic trials.

Comparison of magnetic resonance feature tracking with CSPAMM HARP for the assessment of global and regional layer specific strain

PURPOSE

Layer specific strain assessment is increasingly being employed clinically. Cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) Feature Tracking (FT) is considered to be an adequate alternative for strain assessment. The aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility of FT derived layer specific strain assessment.

METHODS

CSPAMM and SSFP-Cine sequences were acquired in 38 individuals (19 patients with HFpEF, 19 controls) in identical midventricular short-axis locations. Global endocardial-, midmyocardial-, epicardial- peak systolic circumferential strain (PSCS) and regional epicardial PSCS were calculated and intra- as well inter-observer variability were assessed.

RESULTS

FT derived global epicardial and endocardial PSCS (7.9±2.3%; -19.6±4.9%) were significantly lower than tagging derived global epicardial and endocardial PSCS (-13.2±2.8%; -32.3±5.9%) (each p<0.001), while FT derived endocardial PSCS and tagging derived midmyocardial PSCS showed a strong correlation (r=0.71) and no significant differences. Global intra- and inter-observer variability of FT derived endocardial PSCS circumferential measures were acceptable (coefficient of variation 6.5% and 5.7%) while reproducibility of epicardial PSCS (coefficient of variation 16.8% and 18.1%) was poor.

CONCLUSION

The FT algorithm allows for reliable assessment of midmyocardial strain, while underestimating epicardial and endocardial strain and delivering less reproducible results than the gold standard of tagging.

Flip angle optimization for balanced SSFP: Cardiac cine imaging following the application of standard extracellular contrast agent (gadobutrol)

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of the flip angle (FA) on the blood-myocardium contrast and to define the FA leading to highest image quality in contrast-enhanced balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) images. bSSFP images provide excellent contrast between myocardium and blood with high signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios (SNR, CNR). In clinical practice, bSSFP images are typically acquired following the injection of extracellular contrast agents (ECAs), although ECAs decrease the blood-myocardium contrast.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

First, a theoretical optimization was performed to determine the FA that maximizes CNR in bSSFP imaging 2-20 minutes after application of ECA. Second signal-ratios, contrast, SNR, and CNR were assessed in vivo in 25 patients in bSSFP images at 1.5T acquired before (FA = 50°) and 10-15 minutes after (FAs = 50°, 80°, 90°, 100°) application of a double-dose contrast agent. Image quality was assessed by two readers.

RESULTS

Simulations yielded FAs in the range of 85-100° for optimal CNR in contrast-enhanced images. In vivo comparison of conventionally acquired cine images (FA 50°) showed an increase in CNR between blood and myocardium by 57% in diastole and 78% in systole in adapted contrast-enhanced bSSFP images (FA 100°). Contrast-enhanced images with an FA of 100° were rated highest in image quality assessment.

CONCLUSION

By means of FA adaptation a similar blood-myocardium contrast can be achieved in contrast-enhanced bSSFP as in unenhanced bSSFP imaging with an increase in CNR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;47:255-261.

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking using a non-rigid, elastic image registration algorithm: assessment of variability in a real-life clinical setting

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking (CMR-FT) is a promising technique for quantification of myocardial strain from steady-state free precession (SSFP) cine images. We sought to determine the variability of CMR-FT using a non-rigid elastic registration algorithm recently available in a commercial software package (Segment, Medviso) in a real-life clinical setting.

METHODS

Firstly, we studied the variability in a healthy volunteer who underwent 10 CMR studies over five consecutive days. Secondly, 10 patients were selected from our CMR database yielding normal findings (normal group). Finally, we prospectively studied 10 patients with known or suspected myocardial pathology referred for further investigation to CMR (patient group). In the patient group a second study was performed respecting an interval of 30 min between studies. All studies were manually segmented at the end-diastolic phase by three observers. In all subjects left ventricular (LV) circumferential and radial strain were calculated in the short-axis direction (EccSAX and ErrSAX, respectively) and longitudinal strain in the long-axis direction (EllLAX). The level of CMR experience of the observers was 2 weeks, 6 months and >20 years.

RESULTS

Mean contouring time was 7 ± 1 min, mean FT calculation time 13 ± 2 min. Intra- and inter-observer variability was good to excellent with an coefficient of reproducibility (CR) ranging 1.6% to 11.5%, and 1.7% to 16.0%, respectively and an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) ranging 0.89 to 1.00 and 0.74 to 0.99, respectively. Variability considerably increased in the test-retest setting with a CR ranging 4.2% to 29.1% and an ICC ranging 0.66 to 0.95 in the patient group. Variability was not influenced by level of expertise of the observers. Neither did the presence of myocardial pathology at CMR negatively impact variability. However, compared to global myocardial strain, segmental myocardial strain variability increased with a factor 2-3, in particular for the basal and apical short-axis slices.

CONCLUSIONS

CMR-FT using non-rigid, elastic registration is a reproducible approach for strain analysis in patients routinely scheduled for CMR, and is not influenced by the level of training. However, further improvement is needed to reliably depict small variations in segmental myocardial strain.