Guidelines for training in cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)

4D flow cardiac MRI to assess pulmonary blood flow in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with congenital heart disease

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of four-dimensional flow cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (4D flow MRI) compared to right heart catheterization in measuring pulmonary flow (Qp), systemic flow (Qs) and pulmonary-to-systemic flow ratio (Qp/Qs) in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with congenital heart disease (PAH-CHD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was registered on Clinical-trial.gov (NCT03928002). Sixty-four patients with PAH-CHD who underwent 4D flow MRI were included. There were 16 men and 48 women with a mean age of 45.3 ± 13.7 (standard deviation [SD]) years (age range: 21-77 years). Fifty patients (50/64; 78%) presented with pre-tricuspid shunt. Qp (L/min), Qs (L/min) and Qp/Qs were measured invasively using direct Fick method during right heart catheterization and compared with measurements assessed by 4D flow MRI within a 24-48-hour window.

RESULTS

The average mean pulmonary artery pressure was 51 ± 17 (SD) mm Hg with median pulmonary vascular resistance of 8.8 Wood units (Q1, Q3: 5.3, 11.7). A strong linear correlation was found between Qp measurements obtained with 4D flow MRI and those obtained with the Fick method (r = 0.96; P < 0.001). Bland Altman analysis indicated a mean difference of 0.15 ± 0.48 (SD) L/min between Qp estimated by 4D flow MRI and by right heart catheterization. A strong correlation was found between Qs and Qp/Qs measured by 4D flow MRI and those obtained with the direct Fick method (r = 0.85 and r = 0.92; P < 0.001 for both).

CONCLUSION

Qp as measured by 4D flow MRI shows a strong correlation with measurements derived from the direct Fick method. Further investigation is needed to develop less complex and standardized methods for measuring essential PAH parameters, such as pulmonary arterial pressures and pulmonary vascular resistance.

Recommendations for centers performing pediatric heart surgery in the United States

Care and outcomes for the more than 40,000 patients undergoing pediatric and congenital heart surgery in the United States annually are known to vary widely. While consensus recommendations have been published across numerous fields as one mechanism to promote a high level of care delivery across centers, it has been more than two decades since the last pediatric heart surgery recommendations were published in the United States. More recent guidance is lacking, and collaborative efforts involving the many disciplines engaged in caring for these children have not been undertaken to date. The present initiative brings together professional societies spanning numerous care domains and congenital cardiac surgeons, pediatric cardiologists, nursing, and other healthcare professionals from diverse programs around the country to develop consensus recommendations for United States centers. The focus of this initial work is on pediatric heart surgery, and it is recommended that future efforts focus in detail on the adult congenital population. We describe the background, rationale, and methodology related to this collaborative effort, and recommendations put forth for Essential Care Centers (essential services necessary for any program), and Comprehensive Care Centers (services to optimize comprehensive and high-complexity care), encompassing structure, process, and outcome metrics across 14 domains.

Challenges and opportunities for early career medical professionals in cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging: a white paper from the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

The early career professionals in the field of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) face unique challenges and hurdles while establishing their careers in the field. The Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) has expanded the role of the early career section within the society to foster the careers of future CMR leaders. This paper aims to describe the obstacles and available opportunities for the early career CMR professionals worldwide. Societal opportunities and actions targeted at the professional advancement of the early career CMR imagers are needed to ensure continuous growth of CMR as an imaging modality globally.

Recommendations for Centers Performing Pediatric Heart Surgery in the United States

Care and outcomes for the more than 40,000 patients undergoing pediatric and congenital heart surgery in the United States annually are known to vary widely. While consensus recommendations have been published across numerous fields as one mechanism to promote a high level of care delivery across centers, it has been more than two decades since the last pediatric heart surgery recommendations were published in the United States. More recent guidance is lacking, and collaborative efforts involving the many disciplines engaged in caring for these children have not been undertaken to date. The present initiative brings together professional societies spanning numerous care domains and congenital cardiac surgeons, pediatric cardiologists, nursing, and other healthcare professionals from diverse programs around the country to develop consensus recommendations for United States centers. The focus of this initial work is on pediatric heart surgery, and it is recommended that future efforts focus in detail on the adult congenital population. We describe the background, rationale, and methodology related to this collaborative effort, and recommendations put forth for Essential Care Centers (essential services necessary for any program), and Comprehensive Care Centers (services to optimize comprehensive and high-complexity care), encompassing structure, process, and outcome metrics across 14 domains.

Recommendations for Centers Performing Pediatric Heart Surgery in the United States

Care and outcomes for the more than 40,000 patients undergoing pediatric and congenital heart surgery in the United States annually are known to vary widely. While consensus recommendations have been published across numerous fields as one mechanism to promote a high level of care delivery across centers, it has been more than two decades since the last pediatric heart surgery recommendations were published in the United States. More recent guidance is lacking, and collaborative efforts involving the many disciplines engaged in caring for these children have not been undertaken to date. The present initiative brings together professional societies spanning numerous care domains and congenital cardiac surgeons, pediatric cardiologists, nursing, and other healthcare professionals from diverse programs around the country to develop consensus recommendations for United States centers. The focus of this initial work is on pediatric heart surgery, and it is recommended that future efforts focus in detail on the adult congenital population. We describe the background, rationale, and methodology related to this collaborative effort, and recommendations put forth for Essential Care Centers (essential services necessary for any program), and Comprehensive Care Centers (services to optimize comprehensive and high-complexity care), encompassing structure, process, and outcome metrics across 14 domains.

2021-2022 state of our JCMR

In 2021, there were 136 articles published in the Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (JCMR), including 122 original research papers, six reviews, four technical notes, one Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) guideline, one SCMR position paper, one study protocol, and one obituary (Nathaniel Reichek). The volume was up 53% from 2020 (n = 89) with a corresponding 21% decrease in manuscript submissions from 435 to 345. This led to an increase in the acceptance rate from 24 to 32%. The quality of the submissions continues to be high. The 2021 JCMR Impact Factor (which is released in June 2022) markedly increased from 5.41 to 6.90 placing us in the top quartile of Society and cardiac imaging journals. Our 5 year impact factor similarly increased from 6.52 to 7.25. Fifteen years ago, the JCMR was at the forefront of medical and medical society journal migration to the Open-Access format. The Open-Access system has dramatically increased the availability and JCMR citation. Full-text article requests in 2021 approached 1.5 M!. As I have mentioned, it takes a village to run a journal. JCMR is very fortunate to have a group of very dedicated Associate Editors, Guest Editors, Journal Club Editors, and Reviewers. I thank each of them for their efforts to ensure that the review process occurs in a timely and responsible manner. These efforts have allowed the JCMR to continue as the premier journal of our field. My role, and the entire editorial process would not be possible without the ongoing high dedication and efforts of our managing editor, Jennifer Rodriguez. Her premier organizational skills have allowed for streamlining of the review process and marked improvement in our time-to-decision (see later). As I conclude my 6th and final year as your editor-in-chief, I thank you for entrusting me with the JCMR editorship and appreciate the time I have had at the helm. I am very confident that our Journal will reach new heights under the stewardship of Dr. Tim Leiner, currently at the Mayo Clinic with a seamless transition occurring as I write this in late November. I hope that you will continue to send your very best, high quality CMR manuscripts to JCMR, and that our readers will continue to look to JCMR for the very best/state-of-the-art CMR publications.

Society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance recommendations for training and competency of CMR technologists

The Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) recommendations for training and competency of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) technologists document will define the knowledge, experiences and skills required for a technologist to be competent in CMR imaging. By providing a framework for CMR training and competency the overarching goal is to promote the performance of high-quality CMR and to foster the increased adoption of CMR into clinical care.

Diagnostic Yield of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Athletes with and without Features of the Athlete's Heart and Suspected Structural Heart Disease

Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is a second-line imaging test in cardiology. Balanced enlargement of heart chambers called athlete's heart (AH) is a part of physiological adaptation to regular physical activity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic utility of CMR in athletes with suspected structural heart disease (SHD) and to analyse the relation between the coexistence of AH and SHD. We wanted to assess whether the presence of AH phenotype could be considered as a sign of a healthy heart less prone to development of SHD. This retrospective, single centre study included 154 consecutive athletes (57 non-amateur, all sports categories, 87% male, mean age 34 ± 12 years) referred for CMR because of suspected SHD. The suspicion was based on existing guidelines including electrocardiographic and/or echocardiographic changes suggestive of abnormality but without a formal diagnosis. CMR permitted establishment of a new diagnosis in 66 patients (42%). The main diagnoses included myocardial fibrosis typical for prior myocarditis (n = 21), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n = 17, including 6 apical forms), other cardiomyopathies (n = 10) and prior myocardial infarction (n = 6). Athlete's heart was diagnosed in 59 athletes (38%). The presence of pathologic late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was found in 41 patients (27%) and was not higher in athletes without AH (32% vs. 19%, p = 0.08). Junction-point LGE was more prevalent in patients with AH phenotype (22% vs. 9%, p = 0.02). Patients without AH were not more likely to be diagnosed with SHD than those with AH (49% vs. 32%, p = 0.05). Based on the results of CMR and other tests, three patients (2%) were referred for ICD implantation for the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death with one patient experiencing adequate intervention during follow-up. The inclusion of CMR into the diagnostic process leads to a new diagnosis in many athletes with suspicion of SHD and equivocal routine tests. Athletes with AH pattern are equally likely to be diagnosed with SHD in comparison to those without AH phenotype. This shows that the development of AH and SHD can occur in parallel, which makes differential diagnosis in this group of patients more challenging.

2021 - State of our JCMR

There were 89 articles published in the Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (JCMR) in 2020, including 71 original research papers, 5 technical notes, 6 reviews, 4 Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) position papers/guidelines/protocols and 3 corrections. The volume was up 12.7% from 2019 (n = 79) with a corresponding 17.9% increase in manuscript submissions from 369 to 435. This led to a slight increase in the acceptance rate from 22 to 23%. The quality of the submissions continues to be high. The 2020 JCMR Impact Factor (which is published in June 2020) slightly increased from 5.361 to 5.364 placing us in the top quartile of Society and cardiac imaging journals. Our 5 year impact factor increased from 5.18 to 6.52. Fourteen years ago, the JCMR was at the forefront of medical and medical society journal migration to the Open-Access format. The Open-Access system has dramatically increased the availability and citation of JCMR publications with accesses now exceeding 1.2 M! It takes a village to run a journal. JCMR is blessed to have a group of very dedicated Associate Editors, Guest Editors, Journal Club Editors, and Reviewers. I thank each of them for their efforts to ensure that the review process occurs in a timely and responsible manner. These efforts have allowed the JCMR to continue as the premier journal of our field. My role, and the entire process would not be possible without the dedication and efforts of our new managing editor, Jennifer Rodriguez, whose premier organizational efforts have allowed for streamlining of the review process and marked improvement in our time-to-decision (see later). As I begin my 6th and final year as your editor-in-chief, I thank you for entrusting me with the JCMR editorship. I hope that you will continue to send us your very best, high quality manuscripts for JCMR consideration and that our readers will continue to look to JCMR for the very best/state-of-the-art CMR publications. The editorial process continues to be a tremendously fulfilling experience and the opportunity to review manuscripts that reflect the best in our field remains a great joy and true highlight of my week!

Improving cardiovascular magnetic resonance access in low- and middle-income countries for cardiomyopathy assessment: rapid cardiovascular magnetic resonance

AIMS

To evaluate the impact of a simplified, rapid cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) protocol embedded in care and supported by a partner education programme on the management of cardiomyopathy (CMP) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Rapid CMR focused particularly on CMP was implemented in 11 centres, 7 cities, 5 countries, and 3 continents linked to training courses for local professionals. Patients were followed up for 24 months to assess impact. The rate of subsequent adoption was tracked. Five CMR conferences were delivered (920 attendees-potential referrers, radiographers, reporting cardiologists, or radiologists) and five new centres starting CMR. Six hundred and one patients were scanned. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance indications were 24% non-contrast T2* scans [myocardial iron overload (MIO)] and 72% suspected/known cardiomyopathies (including ischaemic and viability). Ninety-eighty per cent of studies were of diagnostic quality. The average scan time was 22 ± 6 min (contrast) and 12 ± 4 min (non-contrast), a potential cost/throughput reduction of between 30 and 60%. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance findings impacted management in 62%, including a new diagnosis in 22% and MIO detected in 30% of non-contrast scans. Nine centres continued using rapid CMR 2 years later (typically 1-2 days per week, 30 min slots).

CONCLUSIONS

Rapid CMR of diagnostic quality can be delivered using available technology in LMICs. When embedded in care and a training programme, costs are lower, care is improved, and services can be sustained over time.

Influence of motion correction on the visual analysis of cardiac magnetic resonance stress perfusion imaging

OBJECTIVE

Image post-processing corrects for cardiac and respiratory motion (MoCo) during cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) stress perfusion. The study analyzed its influence on visual image evaluation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-two patients with (suspected) coronary artery disease underwent a standard CMR stress perfusion exam during free-breathing. Image post-processing was performed without (non-MoCo) and with MoCo (image intensity normalization; motion extraction with iterative non-rigid registration; motion warping with the combined displacement field). Images were evaluated regarding the perfusion pattern (perfusion deficit, dark rim artifact, uncertain signal loss, and normal perfusion), the general image quality (non-diagnostic, imperfect, good, and excellent), and the reader's subjective confidence to assess the images (not confident, confident, very confident).

RESULTS

Fifty-three (non-MoCo) and 52 (MoCo) myocardial segments were rated as 'perfusion deficit', 113 vs. 109 as 'dark rim artifacts', 9 vs. 7 as 'uncertain signal loss', and 817 vs. 824 as 'normal'. Agreement between non-MoCo and MoCo was high with no diagnostic difference per-patient. The image quality of MoCo was rated more often as 'good' or 'excellent' (92 vs. 63%), and the diagnostic confidence more often as "very confident" (71 vs. 45%) compared to non-MoCo.

CONCLUSIONS

The comparison of perfusion images acquired during free-breathing and post-processed with and without motion correction demonstrated that both methods led to a consistent evaluation of the perfusion pattern, while the image quality and the reader's subjective confidence to assess the images were rated more favorably for MoCo.

Kompetenz und Innovation in der kardiovaskulären MRT: Stellungnahme der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie – Herz- und Kreislaufforschung

Diese Stellungnahme der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie (DGK) beschäftigt sich mit der Bedeutung kardiologischer Kompetenz im Gebiet der kardiovaskulären Magnetresonanztomographie (CMR) und deren Aus- und Wechselwirkungen auf klinisches Management im Bereich der Diagnostik, Therapieplanung und Therapie von kardiologischen Patienten. Zahlreiche Innovationen sowohl im technischen als auch klinischen Bereich der CMR basieren auf Publikationen deutscher und europäischer Kardiologen und haben Einzug in die nationalen, europäischen und auch US-amerikanischen Leitlinien gefunden. Hier sollen Empfehlungen zur sicheren, qualitativ hochwertigen und kompetenten Durchführung von CMR-Untersuchungen gegeben werden, im Sinne einer optimalen Nutzung dieser Technik mit unmittelbarer klinischer Einordnung des Untersuchungsergebnisses für die Planung einer Therapiestrategie des kardiovaskulär erkrankten Patienten.

Level 1 of Entrustable Professional Activities in adult echocardiography: a position statement from the EACVI regarding the training and competence requirements for selecting and interpreting echocardiographic examinations

The goal of Level 1 training in echocardiography is to enable the trainee to select echocardiography appropriately for the evaluation of a specific clinical question, and then to interpret the report. It is not the goal of Level 1 training to teach how to perform the examination itself-that is the goal of higher levels of training. However, understanding the principles, indications, and findings of this crucial technique is valuable to many medical professionals including outside cardiology. This should be seen as part of a general understanding of cardiac imaging modalities. The purpose of this position statement is to define the scope and outline the general requirements for Level 1 training and competence in echocardiography. Moreover, the document aims to make a clear distinction between Level 1 competence in echocardiography and focus cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS).

Current Use of Pediatric Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Brazil

Fundamento

Dados sobre o uso de ressonância magnética cardíaca (RMC) em crianças no Brasil são escassos.

Objetivos

Buscamos oferecer informações sobre as práticas atuais de RMC pediátricas no Brasil.

Métodos

Um questionário foi enviado a médicos solicitantes de RMC de todo o país, cobrindo informações sobre si próprios, sobre seus serviços de RMC, contexto clínico dos pacientes e sobre os obstáculos para a realização de RMC em crianças. Para a análise estatística, um p < 0,05 bilateral foi considerado significativo.

Resultados

A pesquisa obteve 142 respostas. Foi relatado que a RMC está disponível para 79% dos respondentes, dos quais 52% raramente ou nunca a utilizam. As indicações mais comuns são cardiomiopatias (84%), pós-operatório de correção de tetralogia de Fallot (81%) e malformações do arco aórtico (53%). A complexidade do exame se correlacionou à relação RMC/cirurgia (Rho = 0,48, IC 95% = 0,32-0,62, p < 0,0001) e ao número de exames de RMC (Rho = 0,52, IC 95% = 0,38-0,64, p < 0,0001). A complexidade da RMC esteve associada à sua realização por cardiologistas pediátricos (RC 2,04, IC 95% 1,2-3,89, p < 0,01). Os principais obstáculos ao uso mais frequente de RMC foram o alto custo (65%), a necessidade de sedação (60%) e o número insuficiente de profissionais qualificados (55%).

Conclusão

A RMC pediátrica não é usada frequentemente no Brasil. A presença de um cardiologista pediátrico a frente dos exames esteve associado ao uso de RMC em pacientes mais complexos. O treinamento de especialistas em RMC pediátrica e a educação dos médicos solicitantes são passos importantes na direção de um uso mais abrangente de RMC no Brasil. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2021; 116(2):305-312)

Trends in Cardiovascular MRI and CT in the U.S. Medicare Population from 2012 to 2017

Purpose

To assess the characteristics and trends of cardiovascular MRI and CT practitioners and practice in the United States.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective cross-sectional analysis of 2012-2017 Medicare Part B physician payments from the Provider Utilization and Payment Data Physician and Other Supplier Public Use Files (POSPUF) was performed. Characteristics of cardiovascular MRI and CT, including the number of providers and examinations, provider sex and location, and physician reimbursement were analyzed. Variable means, standard deviations, and changes per year were reported and compared.

Results

In 2017, 582 physicians provided cardiovascular MRI services in 45 states, a 16.6% increase from 2016 and an 84.8% increase from 2012. A total of 1645 physicians provided cardiovascular CT services in 49 states, a 14.2% increase from 2016 and a 77.3% increase from 2012. Of the providers, 18.0% and 13.3% of cardiovascular MRI and CT providers were women, respectively, similar to providers' respective medical specialties. Only 1.0% of radiologists and 0.2% of cardiologists provided cardiovascular MRI services. A total of 3.2% of radiologists and 0.5% of cardiologists provided cardiovascular CT services. Both cardiovascular MRI use (+75.5%) and cardiovascular CT use (+97.4%) increased markedly over the 6-year study period.

Conclusion

Although the availability of cardiovascular MRI and CT is increasing, both are used less frequently in comparison with other cardiovascular imaging modalities.See also the commentary by Bierhals in this issue.Supplemental material is available for this article.© RSNA, 2021.

Influence of contrast agent and spatial resolution on myocardial strain results using feature tracking MRI

OBJECTIVES

Feature tracking for assessing myocardial strain from cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) cine images detects myocardial deformation abnormalities with prognostic implication, e.g., in myocardial infarction and cardiomyopathy. Standards for image acquisition and processing are not yet available. Study aim was analyzing the influence of spatial resolution and contrast agent on myocardial strain results.

METHODS

Seventy-five patients underwent CMR for analyzing peak systolic circumferential, longitudinal, and radial strain. Group A included n = 50 with normal left ventricular ejection fraction, no wall motion abnormality, and no fibrosis on late enhancement imaging. Group B included n = 25 with chronic myocardial infarct. For feature tracking, steady-state free precession cine images were acquired repeatedly. (1) Native standard cine (spatial resolution 1.4 × 1.4 × 8 mm³). (2) Native cine with lower spatial resolution (2.0 × 2.0 × 8 mm³). (3) Cine equal to variant 1 acquired after administration of gadoteracid.

RESULTS

Lower spatial resolution was associated with elevated longitudinal strain (- 21.7% vs. - 19.8%; p < 0.001) in viable myocardium in group A, and with elevated longitudinal (- 17.0% vs. - 14.3%; p = 0.001), circumferential (- 18.6% vs. - 14.6%; p = 0.002), and radial strain (36.8% vs. 31.0%; p = 0.013) in infarcted myocardium in group B. Gadolinium administration was associated with reduced circumferential (- 21.4% vs. - 22.3%; p = 0.001) and radial strain (44.4% vs. 46.9%; p = 0.016) in group A, whereas strain results of the infarcted tissue in group B did not change after contrast agent administration.

CONCLUSIONS

Variations in spatial resolution and the administration of contrast agent may influence myocardial strain results in viable and partly in infarcted myocardium. Standardized image acquisition seems important for CMR feature tracking.

KEY POINTS

• Feature tracking is used for calculating myocardial strain from cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) cine images. • This prospective study demonstrated that CMR strain results may be influenced by spatial resolution and by the administration of gadolinium-based contrast agent. • The results underline the need for standardized image acquisition for CMR strain analysis, with constant imaging parameters and without contrast agent.

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: 2017/2018 in review

There were 89 articles published in the Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (JCMR) in 2017, including 76 original research papers, 4 reviews, 5 technical notes, 1 guideline, and 3 corrections. The volume was down slightly from 2017 with a corresponding 15% decrease in manuscript submissions from 405 to 346 and thus reflects a slight increase in the acceptance rate from 25 to 26%. The decrease in submissions for the year followed the initiation of the increased author processing charge (APC) for Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) members for manuscripts submitted after June 30, 2018. The quality of the submissions continues to be high. The 2018 JCMR Impact Factor (which is published in June 2019) was slightly lower at 5.1 (vs. 5.46 for 2017; as published in June 2018. The 2018 impact factor means that on average, each JCMR published in 2016 and 2017 was cited 5.1 times in 2018. Our 5 year impact factor was 5.82.In accordance with Open-Access publishing guidelines of BMC, the JCMR articles are published on-line in a continuus fashion in the chronologic order of acceptance, with no collating of the articles into sections or special thematic issues. For this reason, over the years, the Editors have felt that it is useful for the JCMR audience to annually summarize the publications into broad areas of interest or themes, so that readers can view areas of interest in a single article in relation to each other and contemporaneous JCMR publications. In this publication, the manuscripts are presented in broad themes and set in context with related literature and previously published JCMR papers to guide continuity of thought within the journal. In addition, as in the past two years, I have used this publication to also convey information regarding the editorial process and as a "State of our JCMR."This is the 12th year of JCMR as an open-access publication with BMC (formerly known as Biomed Central). The timing of the JCMR transition to the open access platform was "ahead of the curve" and a tribute to the vision of Dr. Matthias Friedrich, the SCMR Publications Committee Chair and Dr. Dudley Pennell, the JCMR editor-in-chief at the time. The open-access system has dramatically increased the reading and citation of JCMR publications and I hope that you, our authors, will continue to send your very best, high quality manuscripts to JCMR for consideration. It takes a village to run a journal and I thank our very dedicated Associate Editors, Guest Editors, Reviewers for their efforts to ensure that the review process occurs in a timely and responsible manner. These efforts have allowed the JCMR to continue as the premier journal of our field. This entire process would also not be possible without the dedication and efforts of our managing editor, Diana Gethers. Finally, I thank you for entrusting me with the editorship of the JCMR as I begin my 4th year as your editor-in-chief. It has been a tremendous experience for me and the opportunity to review manuscripts that reflect the best in our field remains a great joy and highlight of my week!

Echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance based evaluation of myocardial strain and relationship with late gadolinium enhancement

OBJECTIVES

We sought to: (1) determine the agreement in cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) derived strain measurements, (2) compare their reproducibility, (3) determine which approach is best related to CMR late gadolinium enhancement (LGE).

BACKGROUND

While STE-derived strain is routinely used to assess left ventricular (LV) function, CMR strain measurements are not yet standardized. Strain can be measured using dedicated pulse sequences (strain-encoding, SENC), or post-processing of cine images (feature tracking, FT). It is unclear whether these measurements are interchangeable, and whether strain can be used as an alternative to LGE.

METHODS

Fifty patients underwent 2D echocardiography and 1.5 T CMR. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) was measured by STE (Epsilon), FT (NeoSoft) and SENC (Myocardial Solutions) and circumferential strain (GCS) by FT and SENC.

RESULTS

GLS showed good inter-modality agreement (r-values: 0.71-0.75), small biases (< 1%) but considerable limits of agreement (- 7 to 8%). The agreement between the CMR techniques was better for GLS than GCS (r = 0.81 vs 0.67; smaller bias). Repeated measurements showed low intra- and inter-observer variability for both GLS and GCS (intraclass correlations 0.86-0.99; coefficients of variation 3-13%). LGE was present in 22 (44%) of patients. Both SENC- and FT-derived GLS and GCS were associated with LGE, while STE-GLS was not. Irrespective of CMR technique, this association was stronger for GCS (AUC 0.77-0.78) than GLS (AUC 0.67-0.72) and STE-GLS (AUC = 0.58).

CONCLUSION

There is good inter-technique agreement in strain measurements, which were highly reproducible, irrespective of modality or analysis technique. GCS may better reflect the presence of underlying LGE than GLS.