A novel protection liner to improve graft-tunnel interaction following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a finite element analysis

Anterior cruciate ligament injury should not be considered a contraindication for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Finite element analysis

PURPOSE

The research objective of this study is to use finite element analysis to investigate the impact of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury on medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and explore whether patients with ACL injuries can undergo UKA.

METHODS

Based on the morphology of the ACL, models of ACL with diameters ranging from 1 to 10mm are created. Finite element models of UKA include ACL absence and ACLs with different diameters. After creating a complete finite element model and validating it, four different types of loads are applied to the knee joint. Statistical analysis is conducted to assess the stress variations in the knee joint structure.

RESULTS

A total of 11 finite element models of UKA were established. Regarding the stress on the ACL, as the diameter of the ACL increased, when a vertical load of 750N was applied to the femur, combined with an anterior tibial load of 105N, the stress on the ACL increased from 2.61 MPa to 4.62 MPa, representing a 77.05% increase. Regarding the equivalent stress on the polyethylene gasket, a notable high stress change was observed. The stress on the gasket remained between 12.68 MPa and 14.33 MPa in all models. the stress on the gasket demonstrated a decreasing trend. The equivalent stress in the lateral meniscus and lateral femoral cartilage decreases, reducing from the maximum stress of 4.71 MPa to 2.61 MPa, with a mean value of 3.73 MPa. This represents a reduction of 44.72%, and the statistical significance is (P < 0.05). However, under the other three loads, there was no significant statistical significance (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the integrity of the ACL plays a protective role in performing medial UKA. However, this protective effect is limited when performing medial UKA. When the knee joint only has varying degrees of ACL injury, even ACL rupture, and the remaining structures of the knee joint are intact with anterior-posterior stability in the knee joint, it should not be considered a contraindication for medial UKA.

Model Properties and Clinical Application in the Finite Element Analysis of Knee Joint: A Review

The knee is the most complex joint in the human body, including bony structures like the femur, tibia, fibula, and patella, and soft tissues like menisci, ligaments, muscles, and tendons. Complex anatomical structures of the knee joint make it difficult to conduct precise biomechanical research and explore the mechanism of movement and injury. The finite element model (FEM), as an important engineering analysis technique, has been widely used in many fields of bioengineering research. The FEM has advantages in the biomechanical analysis of objects with complex structures. Researchers can use this technology to construct a human knee joint model and perform biomechanical analysis on it. At the same time, finite element analysis can effectively evaluate variables such as stress, strain, displacement, and rotation, helping to predict injury mechanisms and optimize surgical techniques, which make up for the shortcomings of traditional biomechanics experimental research. However, few papers introduce what material properties should be selected for each anatomic structure of knee FEM to meet different research purposes. Based on previous finite element studies of the knee joint, this paper summarizes various modeling strategies and applications, serving as a reference for constructing knee joint models and research design.

A comparison of stress, contact pressure, and contact area on menisci in re-injury mechanisms after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with autograft and synthetic graft: a finite element study

PURPOSE

The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is crucial in maintaining knee stability. Some motion mechanisms, which are common in sports, cause excessive load to be passed on the ACL. In non-contact ACL injuries, the ACL cannot sustain the high stress and becomes injured or ruptures in the valgus-external rotation mechanism (VERM) and varus-internal rotation mechanism (VIRM). The mechanical strength of the grafts used to repair the torn ligament varies. The purpose of this study is to look at the alterations in the menisci after anterior cruciate ligament repair with autografts and synthetic grafts in cases of non-contact re-injury mechanisms.

METHODS

In the finite element analysis, VERM and VIRM motions of the injury were simulated with different ACL graft materials. During the simulations of these mechanism motions with polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and patellar tendon (PT), the contact pressures, contact areas, and von mises stress values created in the medial and lateral meniscus were compared.

RESULTS

The peak contact pressures on the menisci during the VERM are higher than the peak contact pressures during the VIRM, except for one variation. The peak contact pressure of the medial meniscus is almost the same for both graft materials and mechanisms. Furthermore, the peak contact pressures in the menisci are higher than in the VERM. For all injury mechanisms, the peak contact stresses on the lateral meniscus are higher than on the medial meniscus.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that VERM can induce further knee joint injury. It was found that the PET will lessen the pressure on the menisci even more. It is also advantageous since it does not damage the anterior extremities and transmits less pressure to the menisci. In conclusion, using a high-strength ACL is healthier for the menisci. Even though synthetic grafts are not clinically preferred, the study demonstrates that enhancing the material properties of synthetic grafts will increase the chance of their use in the future, based on the current results.

Hourglass-shaped grafts are superior to conventional grafts for restoring knee stability and graft force at knee flexion angle of 30° following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A finite element analysis

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using a generally columnar graft is considered the gold standard for treating anterior cruciate ligament ruptures, but such grafts cannot replicate the geometry and mechanical properties of the native anterior cruciate ligament. Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of an innovative hourglass-shaped graft versus a traditional columnar graft for restoring joint stability and graft force, while avoiding notch impingement following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Methods: Finite element models of a human knee were developed to simulate ① An intact state, ② anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using columnar grafts with different diameters (7.5-12 mm in 0.5 mm increments), ③ anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using columnar grafts with different Young's moduli (129.4, 168.0 and 362.2 MPa) and ④ anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hourglass-shaped grafts with different Young's moduli. The knee model was flexed to 30° and loaded with an anterior tibial load of 103 N, internal tibial moment of 7.5 Nm, and valgus tibial moment of 6.9 Nm. The risk of notch impingement, knee stability and graft forces were compared among the different groups. Results: This study found that columnar grafts could not simultaneously restore knee stability in different degree of freedoms (DOFs) and graft force to a level similar to that of the intact knee. The anterior tibial translation and graft force were restored to a near-normal condition when the internal tibial rotation was over-restrained and valgus tibial rotation was lax. A graft diameter of at least 10 mm was needed to restore knee stability and graft force to physiological levels, but such large grafts were found to be at high risk of notch impingement. In contrast, the hourglass-shaped graft was able to simultaneously restore both knee stability and graft force at knee flexion of 30° while also having a much lower risk of impingement. Conclusion: Under knee flexion angle of 30°, an hourglass-shaped graft was better able to restore joint stability and graft force to a near-physiological level than columnar grafts, while also reducing the risk of notch impingement.

Graft Diameter Should Reflect the Size of the Native Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) to Improve the Outcome of ACL Reconstruction: A Finite Element Analysis

The size of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) often varies between individuals, but such variation is not typically considered during ACL reconstruction (ACLR). This study aimed to explore how the size of the ACL affects the selection of a suitable graft diameter. A finite element model of a human knee was implanted with intact ACLs of different dimensions (0.95, 1 and 1.05 times the size of the original ACL) and with grafts of different diameters, to simulate ACLR (diameter 7.5–12 mm in 0.5 mm increments). The knee models were flexed to 30° and loaded with an anterior tibial load of 103 N, internal tibial moment of 7.5 Nm, and valgus tibial moment of 6.9 Nm. Knee kinematics (anterior tibial translation (ATT), internal tibial rotation (ITR) and valgus tibial rotation (VTR)) and ligament forces were recorded and compared among the different groups. The results showed that, compared with the intact knee, a graft diameter of 7.5 mm was found to increase the ATT and VTR, but reduce the graft force. Increasing the graft diameter reduced knee laxity and increased the graft force. A 10% increase in the size of the ACL corresponded to a 3 mm larger graft diameter required to restore knee stability and graft force after ACLR. It was concluded that the graft diameter should be selected according to the dimensions of the native ACL, for better restoration of knee functionality. This study may help to improve the clinical treatment of ACL ruptures.

Central femoral tunnel placement can reduce stress and strain around bone tunnels and graft more than anteromedial femoral tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

The present study investigated the effects of anteromedial (AM) and central femoral footprint placement on stress and strain distribution around the femoral and tibial tunnel and graft following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). A three-dimensional (3D) reconstructed knee model was validated and used for simulating ACLR by finite element analysis. A combined loading during normal human walking was applied to the knee models using different anatomic femoral tunnel placement at 20° knee flexion. The results of von Mises stress and principal strain at the entrances of the femoral and tibial tunnel and ACL graft was determined. The peak von Mises stress and the maximum principal strain in the AM footprint group were 8.78 MPa and 8850.89 μ-strain at the entrance of femoral tunnel, and 5.29 MPa and 5553.27 μ-strain at the entrance of tibial tunnel. The results in the AM footprint group were higher than that in the central footprint group. The peak von Mises stress around the ACL graft following AM footprint ACLR was 28.63 MPa, higher than that following the central footprint ACLR. The AM footprint ACLR generated more significant peak von Mises stress and maximum principal strain around the entrances of femoral and tibial tunnel and the graft than the central footprint. The present results are of clinical relevance as they can provide a better understanding of tunnel enlargement and graft failure.

The Femoral Tunnel Drilling Angle at 45° Coronal and 45° Sagittal Provided the Lowest Peak Stress and Strain on the Bone Tunnels and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft

Purpose: The aims of this study were to 1) investigate the effects of femoral drilling angle in coronal and sagittal planes on the stress and strain distribution around the femoral and tibial tunnel entrance and the stress distribution on the graft, following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), 2) identify the optimal femoral drilling angle to reduce the risk of the tunnel enlargement and graft failure.

Methods: A validated three-dimensional (3D) finite element model of a healthy right cadaveric knee was used to simulate an anatomic ACLR with the anteromedial (AM) portal technique. Combined loading of 103.0 N anterior tibial load, 7.5 Nm internal rotation moment, and 6.9 Nm valgus moment during normal human walking at joint flexion of 20° was applied to the ACLR knee models using different tunnel angles (30°/45°/60° and 45°/60° in the coronal and sagittal planes, respectively). The distribution of von Mises stress and strain around the tunnel entrances and the graft was calculated and compared among the different finite element ACLR models with varying femoral drilling angles.

Results: With an increasing coronal obliquity drilling angle (30° to 60°), the peak stress and maximum strain on the femoral and tibial tunnel decreased from 30° to 45° and increased from 45° to 60°, respectively. With an increasing sagittal obliquity drilling angle (45° to 60°), the peak stress and the maximum strain on the bone tunnels increased. The lowest peak stress and maximum strain at the ACL tunnels were observed at 45° coronal/45° sagittal drilling angle (7.5 MPa and 7,568.3 μ-strain at the femoral tunnel entrance, and 4.0 MPa and 4,128.7 μ-strain at the tibial tunnel entrance). The lowest peak stress on the ACL graft occurred at 45° coronal/45° sagittal (27.8 MPa) drilling angle.

Conclusions: The femoral tunnel drilling angle could affect both the stress and strain distribution on the femoral tunnel, tibial tunnel, and graft. A femoral tunnel drilling angle of 45° coronal/ 45° sagittal demonstrated the lowest peak stress, maximum strain on the femoral and tibial tunnel entrance, and the lowest peak stress on the ACL graft.