1
|
Hu R, Chen Y, Hu J, Yi L. Establishing Nursing-Sensitive Quality Indicators for the Central Sterile Supply Department: A Modified Delphi Study. Qual Manag Health Care 2024:00019514-990000000-00069. [PMID: 38427344 DOI: 10.1097/qmh.0000000000000418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Previous studies have shown that improving quality management in the central sterile supply department (CSSD) is an effective measure to control and decrease hospital-acquired infections. This study aimed to establish nursing-sensitive quality indicators for CSSD nursing in China. METHODS We drafted nursing-sensitive quality indicators on the basis of the Structure-Process-Outcome model, and then conducted 2 rounds of consultation with experts using a modified Delphi method to determine the indicators and scientific methods of measurement. RESULTS We identified five CSSD nursing-sensitive quality indicators. Recovery rates of the 2 rounds of valid questionnaires were 100%. Expert authority coefficients were 0.810 and 0.902, respectively. Kendall's coefficients of concordance were 0.168 and 0.210, respectively ( P < .05). CONCLUSION Evidence-based nursing-sensitive quality indicators for the CSSD were established.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruixue Hu
- Author Affiliations: Department of Sterile processing Nursing, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China; and Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rowan NJ, Kremer T, McDonnell G. A review of Spaulding's classification system for effective cleaning, disinfection and sterilization of reusable medical devices: Viewed through a modern-day lens that will inform and enable future sustainability. Sci Total Environ 2023; 878:162976. [PMID: 36963674 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2022] [Revised: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
Despite advances in medicine and innovations in many underpinning fields including disease prevention and control, the Spaulding classification system, originally proposed in 1957, remains widely used for defining the disinfection and sterilization of contaminated re-usable medical devices and surgical instruments. Screening PubMed and Scopus databases using a PRISMA guiding framework generated 272 relevant publications that were used in this review. Findings revealed that there is a need to evolve how medical devices are designed, and processed by cleaning, disinfection (and/or sterilization) to mitigate patient risks, including acquiring an infection. This Spaulding Classification remains in use as it is logical, easily applied and understood by users (microbiologists, epidemiologists, manufacturers, industry) and by regulators. However, substantial changes have occurred over the past 65 years that challenge interpretation and application of this system that includes inter alia emergence of new pathogens (viruses, mycobacteria, protozoa, fungi), a greater understanding of innate and adaptive microbial tolerance to disinfection, toxicity risks, increased number of vulnerable patients and associated patient procedures, and greater complexity in design and use of medical devices. Common cited examples include endoscopes that enable non- or minimal invasive procedures but are highly sophisticated with various types of materials (polymers, electronic components etc), long narrow channels, right angle and heat-sensitive components and various accessories (e.g., values) that can be contaminated with high levels of microbial bioburden and patient tissues after use. Contaminated flexible duodenoscopes have been a source of several significant infection outbreaks, where at least 9 reported cases were caused by multidrug resistant organisms [MDROs] with no obvious breach in processing detected. Despite this, there is evidence of the lack of attention to cleaning and maintenance of these devices and associated equipment. Over the last few decades there is increasing genomic evidence of innate and adaptive resistance to chemical disinfectant methods along with adaptive tolerance to environmental stresses. To reduce these risks, it has been proposed to elevate classification of higher-risk flexible endoscopes (such as duodenoscopes) from semi-critical [contact with mucous membrane and intact skin] to critical use [contact with sterile tissue and blood] that entails a transition to using low-temperature sterilization modalities instead of routinely using high-level disinfection; thus, increasing the margin of safety for endoscope processing. This timely review addresses important issues surrounding use of the Spaulding classification system to meet modern-day needs. It specifically addresses the need for automated, robust cleaning and drying methods combined with using real-time monitoring of device processing. There is a need to understand entire end-to-end processing of devices instead of adopting silo approaches that in the future will be informed by artificial intelligence and deep-learning/machine learning. For example, combinational solutions that address the formation of complex biofilms that harbour pathogenic and opportunistic microorganisms on the surfaces of processed devices. Emerging trends are addressed including future sustainability for the medical devices sector that can be enabled via a new Quintuple Helix Hub approach that combines academia, industry, healthcare, regulators, and society to unlock real world solutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N J Rowan
- Centre for Sustainable Disinfection and Sterilization, Bioscience Research Institute, Technological University of the Shannon Midlands Midwest, Athlone Campus, Ireland; Department of Nursing and Healthcare, Technological University of the Shannon Midwest Mideast, Athlone Campus, Ireland; SFI-funded CURAM Centre for Medical Device Research, University of Galway, Ireland.
| | - T Kremer
- Centre for Sustainable Disinfection and Sterilization, Bioscience Research Institute, Technological University of the Shannon Midlands Midwest, Athlone Campus, Ireland; Microbiological Quality & Sterility Assurance, Johnson & Johnson, 1000 Route 202, South Raritan, NJ 08869, USA
| | - G McDonnell
- Microbiological Quality & Sterility Assurance, Johnson & Johnson, 1000 Route 202, South Raritan, NJ 08869, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Madureira RADS, de Oliveira AC. Cleaning of in-hospital flexible endoscopes: Limitations and challenges. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem 2022; 30:e3684. [PMID: 36287399 PMCID: PMC9580990 DOI: 10.1590/1518-8345.5969.3684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE to analyze the cleaning process of gastroscopes, colonoscopes and duodenoscopes in eight in-hospital health services. METHOD a cross-sectional study conducted with 22 endoscopes (eight gastroscopes, eight colonoscopes and six duodenoscopes), and microbiological analysis of 60 samples of air/water channels (all endoscopes) and elevator (duodenoscopes), in addition to protein testing. Descriptive statistics with calculation of frequencies and central tendency measures was used in data analysis. RESULTS the processing of 22 endoscopes was monitored with microbiological analysis for 60 channels. In the pre-cleaning procedure, in 82.3% (14/17) of the devices, gauze was used in cleaning the insertion tube. Incomplete immersion of the endoscope in detergent solution occurred in 72.3% (17/22) of the cases, and in 63.6% (14/22) there was no standardization of filling-in of the channels. Friction of the biopsy channel was not performed in 13.6% (3/22) of the devices. In the microbiological analysis, 25% (7/32) of the samples from the stored endoscopes were positive for microbial growth (from 2x101 to 9.5x104 CFU/mL), while after processing, contamination was 32% (9/28). Protein residues in the elevator channel were detected in 33% of duodenoscopes. CONCLUSION the results indicate important gaps in the stages of pre-cleaning and cleaning of endoscopes that, associated with presence of protein residues and growth of microorganisms of epidemiological importance, indicate limitations in safety of the processing procedures, which can compromise the disinfection processes and, consequently, their safe use among patients subjected to such tests.
Collapse
|
4
|
Kwakman JA, Rauwers AW, Buijs JG, de Groot W, Vos MC, Bruno MJ. No relation between adenosine triphosphate after manual cleaning and presence of microorganisms on endoscopes after automated high-level disinfection. Endosc Int Open 2022; 10:E1275-E1281. [PMID: 36118629 PMCID: PMC9473803 DOI: 10.1055/a-1897-5000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) tests are increasingly used to detect biological material; however, their reliability to detect bacterial contamination in endoscopes is not proven. We investigated the predictive value of ATP tests after manual cleaning for presence or absence of microorganisms as shown by culture after automated high-level disinfection (HLD) in duodenoscopes and linear echoendoscopes (DLEs). Patients and methods After manual cleaning, ATP tests were performed on swab samples taken from the detachable cap and forceps elevator, and on flush samples of the DLE working channels. These results were compared to the growth of any microorganisms in cultures acquired after automated HLD. ATP tests with > 200 relative light units (RLU) were considered positive. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were used to compare the RLU levels with microbial presence in cultures. Results In total, 903 procedures were performed involving 26 distinct DLEs. Depending on sample site, 20.8 % (cap) to 63.8 % (channel brush) of the ATP negative samples were accompanied by positive post-HLD cultures. 54.4 % of the cap samples with a positive culture (growth of any kind of microorganism) and 91.8 % of the channel samples with a positive culture had a negative ATP test after manual cleaning. ROC curves per sample site, DLE type and microorganism type all had area under the curves below 0.6. Conclusions In our study, ATP tests performed after manual cleaning could not predict presence or absence of microorganisms after automated HLD as shown by culture. More than half of the positive cultures were preceded by a negative ATP test.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith A. Kwakman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands,Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Arjan W. Rauwers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands,Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jolanda G. Buijs
- Qualtity Assurance and Regulatory Affairs Office Medical Devices, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Woutrinus de Groot
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Margreet C. Vos
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marco J. Bruno
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rodríguez de Santiago E, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Pohl H, Agrawal D, Arvanitakis M, Baddeley R, Bak E, Bhandari P, Bretthauer M, Burga P, Donnelly L, Eickhoff A, Hayee B, Kaminski MF, Karlović K, Lorenzo-Zúñiga V, Pellisé M, Pioche M, Siau K, Siersema PD, Stableforth W, Tham TC, Triantafyllou K, Tringali A, Veitch A, Voiosu AM, Webster GJ, Vienne A, Beilenhoff U, Bisschops R, Hassan C, Gralnek IM, Messmann H. Reducing the environmental footprint of gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates (ESGENA) Position Statement. Endoscopy 2022; 54:797-826. [PMID: 35803275 DOI: 10.1055/a-1859-3726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Climate change and the destruction of ecosystems by human activities are among the greatest challenges of the 21st century and require urgent action. Health care activities significantly contribute to the emission of greenhouse gases and waste production, with gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy being one of the largest contributors. This Position Statement aims to raise awareness of the ecological footprint of GI endoscopy and provides guidance to reduce its environmental impact. The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and the European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates (ESGENA) outline suggestions and recommendations for health care providers, patients, governments, and industry. MAIN STATEMENTS 1: GI endoscopy is a resource-intensive activity with a significant yet poorly assessed environmental impact. 2: ESGE-ESGENA recommend adopting immediate actions to reduce the environmental impact of GI endoscopy. 3: ESGE-ESGENA recommend adherence to guidelines and implementation of audit strategies on the appropriateness of GI endoscopy to avoid the environmental impact of unnecessary procedures. 4: ESGE-ESGENA recommend the embedding of reduce, reuse, and recycle programs in the GI endoscopy unit. 5: ESGE-ESGENA suggest that there is an urgent need to reassess and reduce the environmental and economic impact of single-use GI endoscopic devices. 6: ESGE-ESGENA suggest against routine use of single-use GI endoscopes. However, their use could be considered in highly selected patients on a case-by-case basis. 7: ESGE-ESGENA recommend inclusion of sustainability in the training curricula of GI endoscopy and as a quality domain. 8: ESGE-ESGENA recommend conducting high quality research to quantify and minimize the environmental impact of GI endoscopy. 9: ESGE-ESGENA recommend that GI endoscopy companies assess, disclose, and audit the environmental impact of their value chain. 10: ESGE-ESGENA recommend that GI endoscopy should become a net-zero greenhouse gas emissions practice by 2050.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrique Rodríguez de Santiago
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Universidad de Alcalá, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mario Dinis-Ribeiro
- Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center (Porto.CCC), and RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Porto, Portugal
| | - Heiko Pohl
- Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, New Hampshire, and Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, VA White River Junction, Vermont, USA
| | - Deepak Agrawal
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dell Medical School, University of Texas Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Marianna Arvanitakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Robin Baddeley
- King's Health Partners Institute for Therapeutic Endoscopy, King's College Hospital, and Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St Mark's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Elzbieta Bak
- Department of Gastroenterology and Internal Medicine, Clinical Hospital of Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | - Michael Bretthauer
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, and Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Patricia Burga
- Endoscopy Department, University Hospital of Padua, Italy
| | - Leigh Donnelly
- Endoscopy Department, Northumbria Healthcare NHS Trust, Northumberland, United Kingdom
| | - Axel Eickhoff
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Diabetologie, Infektiologie, Klinikum Hanau, Hanau, Germany
| | - Bu'Hussain Hayee
- Department of Gastroenterology, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michal F Kaminski
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Department of Oncological Gastroenterology, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Katarina Karlović
- Clinical Hospital Center Rijeka , Department of Gastroenterology, Endoscopy Unit, Rijeka, Croatia
| | - Vicente Lorenzo-Zúñiga
- Department of Gastroenterology, University and Polytechnic La Fe Hospital/IIS La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Maria Pellisé
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), and Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mathieu Pioche
- Endoscopy Unit, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France
| | - Keith Siau
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dudley Group Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, United Kingdom
| | - Peter D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - William Stableforth
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dudley Group Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, United Kingdom
| | - Tony C Tham
- Division of Gastroenterology, Ulster Hospital, Dundonald, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine - Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Alberto Tringali
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, ULSS 2 Marca Trevigiana, Conegliano Hospital, Conegliano, Italy
| | - Andrew Veitch
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom
| | - Andrei M Voiosu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | - George J Webster
- Department of Gastroenterology, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Raf Bisschops
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Catholic University of Leuven (KUL), TARGID, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, and Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Ian M Gralnek
- Ellen and Pinchas Mamber Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Emek Medical Center, Afula, and Rappaport Faculty of Medicine Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Helmut Messmann
- III Medizinische Klinik Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rauwers AW, Voor In 't Holt AF, Buijs JG, Groot WD, Erler NS, Vos MC, Bruno MJ. Assessment of postmanual cleaning adenosine triphosphate tests to prevent the use of contaminated duodenoscopes and linear echoendoscopes: the DETECT study. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 96:282-290.e5. [PMID: 35341715 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.03.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS We investigated whether the use of postmanual cleaning adenosine triphosphate (ATP) tests lowers the number of duodenoscopes and linear echoendoscopes (DLEs) contaminated with gut flora. METHODS In this single-center before-and-after study, DLEs were ATP tested after cleaning. During the control period, participants were blinded to ATP results: ATP-positive DLEs were not recleaned. During the intervention period, ATP-positive DLEs were recleaned. DLEs underwent microbiologic sampling after high-level disinfection (HLD) with participants blinded to culture results. RESULTS Using 15 endoscopes of 5 different DLE types, we included 909 procedures (52% duodenoscopes, 48% linear echoendoscopes). During the intervention period, the absolute rate of contamination with gut flora was higher (16% vs 21%). The main analysis showed that contamination was less likely to occur in the intervention period (odds ratio, .32; 95% credible interval [CI], .12-.85). A secondary analysis showed that this effect was based on 1 particular duodenoscope type (estimated probability, 39% [95% CI, 18%-64%] vs 9% [95% CI, 2%-21%]), whereas no effect was seen in the other 4 DLE types. In detail, of the 4 duodenoscopes of this type, 2 had lower contamination rates (69% vs 39% and 36% vs 10%). During the control period, both these duodenoscopes had multiple episodes with ongoing contamination with the same microorganism that ended weeks before the start of the intervention period (ie, they were not terminated by ATP testing). CONCLUSIONS Postmanual cleaning ATP tests do not reduce post-HLD gut flora contamination rates of DLEs. Hence, postcleaning ATP tests are not suited as a means for quality control of endoscope reprocessing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arjan W Rauwers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anne F Voor In 't Holt
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jolanda G Buijs
- Staff Office Medical Devices, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Woutrinus de Groot
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nicole S Erler
- Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Margreet C Vos
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marco J Bruno
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sivek AD, Davis J, Tremoulet P, Smith M, Lavanchy C, Sparnon E, Kommala D. Healthcare worker feedback on duodenoscope reprocessing workflow and ergonomics. Am J Infect Control 2022; 50:1038-1048. [PMID: 35108583 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2022.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Revised: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objectives of this survey study were to assess duodenoscope precleaning and manual cleaning times, identify human factors issues in duodenoscope reprocessing workflow or ergonomics, and ascertain any best practices in duodenoscope reprocessing. METHODS Researchers developed the confidential, qualitative, online Duodenoscope Reprocessing Workflow and Ergonomic Design Human Factors Survey with an intended audience of healthcare workers (HCWs) who routinely perform duodenoscope precleaning or manual cleaning. The unrestricted survey link was distributed to target HCW email addresses in December 2020; the survey closed in January 2021. RESULTS Three hundred and forty-one individuals completed the survey. Most respondents complete duodenoscope precleaning in 10 minutes or less and manual cleaning in 16-to-30 minutes. Most respondents' facilities use fixed distal endcap duodenoscopes. Most respondents experience pressure to work faster when cleaning duodenoscopes and reported that cleaning duodenoscopes caused fatigue or discomfort in at least one body part. Mentoring HCWs and retaining experienced staff were 2 primary duodenoscope reprocessing best practices identified by respondents. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS To enhance duodenoscope cleaning, facilities should provide ample reprocessing work spaces with incorporated height-adjustable work surfaces, train HCWs on validated duodenoscope reprocessing instructions, provide step-by-step instructions for HCWs when duodenoscope cleaning is performed, mentor reprocessing HCWs, and retain experienced staff.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Patrice Tremoulet
- ECRI, Plymouth Meeting, PA; Department of Psychology, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Madureira RADS, Oliveira ACD. Limpieza de endoscopios flexibles intrahospitalarios: limitaciones y desafíos. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem 2022. [DOI: 10.1590/1518-8345.5969.3683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Resumen Objetivo: analizar el proceso de limpieza de gastroscopios, colonoscopios y duodenoscopios en ocho servicios de salud intrahospitalarios. Método: estudio transversal con 22 endoscopios, de los cuales ocho eran gastroscopios, ocho colonoscopios y seis duodenoscopios, y análisis microbiológico de 60 muestras de los canales de aire/agua (todos los endoscopios) y elevador (duodenoscopios), además de prueba de proteínas. En el análisis de los datos se utilizó estadística descriptiva, con cálculo de frecuencias y medidas de tendencia central. Resultados: el procesamiento de los 22 endoscopios fue monitoreado con el análisis microbiológico de 60 canales. En la prelimpieza, en el 82,3% (14/17) de los equipos se utilizó gasa para limpiar el tubo de inserción. En el 72,3% (17/22) de los casos la inmersión del endoscopio en solución detergente fue incompleta y en el 63,6% (14/22) no hubo estandarización del llenado de los canales. La fricción del canal de biopsia no se realizó en el 13,6% (3/22) de los equipos. En el análisis microbiológico, el 25% (7/32) de las muestras endoscópicas almacenadas dio positivo para crecimiento microbiano (2x101 a 9,5x104 UFC/ml), mientras que después del procesamiento, la contaminación fue del 32% (9/28). Se detectaron residuos de proteína en el canal elevador en el 33% de los duodenoscopios. Conclusión: los resultados indican que hay importantes lagunas en las etapas de prelimpieza y limpieza de los endoscopios que, junto con la presencia de residuos de proteínas y del crecimiento de microorganismos de importancia epidemiológica, indican limitaciones en la seguridad del procesamiento, que pueden comprometer los procesos de desinfección y, por ende, el uso seguro en los pacientes que se someten a esos procedimientos.
Collapse
|
9
|
Madureira RADS, Oliveira ACD. Limpeza de endoscópios flexíveis intra-hospitalares: limitações e desafios. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem 2022. [DOI: 10.1590/1518-8345.5969.3685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Resumo Objetivo: analisar o processo de limpeza de gastroscópios, colonoscópios e duodenoscópios em oito serviços de saúde intra-hospitalar. Método: estudo transversal com 22 endoscópios, sendo oito gastroscópios, oito colonoscópios e seis duodenoscópios, e análise microbiológica de 60 amostras dos canais de ar/água (todos os endoscópios) e elevador (duodenoscópios), além de teste de proteína. Na análise dos dados, utilizou-se estatística descritiva, com cálculo de frequências e medidas de tendência central. Resultados: o processamento de 22 endoscópios foi acompanhado com análise microbiológica de 60 canais. Na pré-limpeza, em 82,3% (14/17) dos equipamentos, foi utilizada gaze na limpeza do tubo de inserção. A imersão incompleta do endoscópio em solução detergente ocorreu em 72,3% (17/22) dos casos, e em 63,6% (14/22) não havia padronização do preenchimento dos canais. A fricção do canal de biópsia não foi realizada em 13,6% (3/22) dos equipamentos. Na análise microbiológica, 25% (7/32) das amostras dos endoscópios armazenados foram positivas para crescimento microbiano (2x101 a 9,5x104 UFC/mL), enquanto após o processamento, a contaminação foi de 32% (9/28). Resíduos de proteína no canal do elevador foram detectados em 33% dos duodenoscópios. Conclusão: os resultados apontam lacunas importantes nas etapas de pré-limpeza e limpeza dos endoscópios que, associadas à presença de resíduos de proteína e ao crescimento de microrganismo de importância epidemiológica, sinalizam limitações na segurança do processamento, que podem comprometer os processos de desinfecção e consequentemente seu uso seguro entre pacientes submetidos a tais exames.
Collapse
|
10
|
Spinzi G, Milano A, Brosolo P, Da Massa Carrara P, Labardi M, Merighi A, Riccardi L, Torresan F, Capelli M. Accreditation program for gastrointestinal endoscopes reprocessing in Italy: An on-site survey. Endosc Int Open 2021; 9:E1627-E1632. [PMID: 34790524 PMCID: PMC8589566 DOI: 10.1055/a-1535-1238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2020] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Endoscope reprocessing has been associated with a variable failure rate. Our aim was to present an overview on current practices for reprocessing in Italian facilities and discuss the principle critical points. Methods In 2014 the Italian Society for Digestive Diseases implemented an accreditation program in collaboration with an independent organization for certification and with the Italian Association for Endoscopy Technical Operators. During a 1-day site visit of the endoscopy center, two endoscopists, one nurse, and the representative of the certification body evaluated the endoscope reprocessing. Results As of July 1, 2020, 28 endoscopy centers had been accredited. Ten centers are completing the measures to correct deficiencies found at the visit. Three centers withdrew from the program. The accreditation program has found variations between the various centers, confirming the poor compliance with guidelines. Major deviations from the standards, established by the model before the site visit according to national and international guidelines, concerned instrument cleaning (44.7 % of the centers), instrument storage (23.7 %), and microbiological tests (31.6 %). Conclusions Our overview demonstrated the lack of many reprocessing phases, which are important to prevent endoscopy-associated infections. Accreditation can achieve a transformation in quality and safety of reprocessing with the Italian centrally-led approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giancarlo Spinzi
- Gasastroenterology and Endoscopy Department, Valduce Hospital, Como – Italy
| | - Angelo Milano
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Department, Chieti University, Chieti – Italy
| | - Piero Brosolo
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Department, Pordenone Hospital, Pordenone – Italy
| | | | - Maurizio Labardi
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Department, Firenze Hospital, Firenze – Italy
| | - Alberto Merighi
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Department, Ferrara Hospital, Ferrara – Italy
| | - Luisa Riccardi
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Department, Perugia Hospital, Perugia – Italy
| | - Francesco Torresan
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Department, Bologna University, Bologna – Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Shin HY, Jang DH, Jun JK. A nationwide survey on the effectiveness of training on endoscope reprocessing within the national cancer screening program in Korea. Am J Infect Control 2021; 49:1031-5. [PMID: 33582222 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2021.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2020] [Revised: 02/03/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The National Cancer Center has provided nationwide endoscope reprocessing training to hospitals annually performing national gastric and colorectal cancer screening in Korea since 2012. This study aimed to evaluate the adherence of past participants of endoscope reprocessing training to the reprocessing guidelines and their satisfaction with the current training. METHODS Training on endoscope reprocessing was implemented 18 times across the country, from June 2019 to November 2019. Immediately after the training, participants filled a paper questionnaire related to reprocessing practices and satisfaction with the current training anonymously. RESULTS A total of 1,132 participants trained responded to the survey (response rate, 95.4%). Of the study participants, 45.7% participated in the past endoscope reprocessing training, and 94.6% of them answered that they have adhered to the endoscope reprocessing guidelines. Experience of participation in endoscope reprocessing training was significantly associated with practical adherence to endoscope reprocessing guidelines (aOR, 6.55; 95% CI, 3.93 to 10.91). And, 91% of study participants were satisfied with the current endoscope reprocessing training. CONCLUSIONS The current training on endoscope reprocessing provided at the national level could help ensure adherence to reprocessing guidelines, resulting in obtaining quality control for endoscopy. However, about half of practitioners currently working in endoscopy units had not received sufficient reprocessing training, and thus more training is needed for them.
Collapse
|
12
|
Kong X, Zhu X, Zhang Y, Wu J. The application of plan, do, check, act (PDCA) quality management in reducing nosocomial infections in endoscopy rooms: It does work. Int J Clin Pract 2021; 75:e14351. [PMID: 33973325 DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.14351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of plan, do, check, act (PDCA) cycle quality management in reducing nosocomial infections in endoscopy rooms remains unclear; we aimed to evaluate the effects of PDCA in the nosocomial infections control of endoscopy rooms. METHODS This present study was a before and after design. The patients treated in our endoscopy room from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2019 were included in the control group, which were managed according to current department practice. The patients from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2020 were included in the PDCA group, which were managed according to PDCA cycle quality management including formulation of cleaning and disinfection process, establishment of an infection control team and improvement of inspection standards. The nosocomial infections of patients, the pass rate of medical staff's knowledge on the nosocomial infection and hand hygiene, the pass rate of disinfection of endoscope cavity and surface, the incidence of sharp injury and biological pollution were compared between two groups. RESULTS A total of 1020 patients were included, with 512 patients in PDCA group and 508 patients in the control group. The incidence of nosocomial infections in PDCA group was significantly lower than that of control group (0.98% vs. 2.76%, P = .002). The pass rate of medical staff's knowledge on the nosocomial infection and hand hygiene was significantly higher than that of control group (all P < .05). The pass rate of disinfection of endoscope cavity in PDCA group was significantly higher than that of control group (P = .037). The incidence of sharp injury and biological pollution in PDCA group were significantly lower than that of control group (all P < .05). CONCLUSIONS PDCA cycle management is beneficial to reduce the risk of nosocomial infection, enhance the awareness of infection control and reduce the risk of occupational exposure of medical staff in the endoscopy room.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoming Kong
- Department of Infection Management, People's Hospital of Liyang, Changzhou, China
| | - Xiaolu Zhu
- Department of Infection Management, People's Hospital of Liyang, Changzhou, China
| | - Yidan Zhang
- Department of Infection Management, People's Hospital of Liyang, Changzhou, China
| | - Jie Wu
- Department of Infection Management, People's Hospital of Liyang, Changzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hughes T, Pietropaolo A, Jones P, Oderda M, Gontero P, Somani BK. Outcomes and Cost Evaluation Related to a Single-Use, Disposable Ureteric Stent Removal System: a Systematic Review of the Literature. Curr Urol Rep 2021; 22:41. [PMID: 34128107 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-021-01055-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To present the latest evidence related to the outcomes and cost of single-use, disposable ureteric stent removal system (Isiris). RECENT FINDINGS Our review suggests that compared to a reusable flexible cystoscope (re-FC), a disposable flexible cystoscope (d-FC) with built-in grasper (Isiris) significantly reduced procedural time and provided a cost benefit when the latter was used in a ward or outpatient clinic-based setting. The use of d-FC also allowed endoscopy slots to be used for other urgent diagnostic procedures. Disposable FCs are effective and safe for ureteric stent removal. They offer greater flexibility and, in most cases, have been demonstrated to be cost-effective compared to re-FCs. They are at their most useful in remote, low-volume centres, in less well-developed countries and in centres where large demand is placed on endoscopy resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Hughes
- Urology Department, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
| | - Amelia Pietropaolo
- Urology Department, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Patrick Jones
- Urology Department, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Marco Oderda
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino - Molinette Hospital, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino - Molinette Hospital, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Bhaskar K Somani
- Urology Department, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Suresh S, Pande M, Patel K, Mahometano LD, Romero LG, Barringer D, Sealock RJ, Raju GS. Education, training, and knowledge of infection control among endoscopy technicians and nurses. Am J Infect Control 2021; 49:836-839. [PMID: 33485921 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2021.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Revised: 01/14/2021] [Accepted: 01/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Our survey of 88 endoscopy technicians and nurses to determine their experience, training, and knowledge of infection control found that few personnel (<15%) received formal training in endoscope reprocessing or infection prevention before or after joining an endoscopy unit. While self-reported confidence in endoscope reprocessing was high (9 out of 10), knowledge of best practices in this regard lagged (average assessment score of 62%).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanjivini Suresh
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, & Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| | - Mala Pande
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, & Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Kalpesh Patel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Liben D Mahometano
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, & Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Laura G Romero
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, & Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Denise Barringer
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, & Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Robert J Sealock
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Gottumukkala S Raju
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, & Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tian H, Sun J, Guo S, Zhu X, Feng H, Zhuang Y, Wang X. The Effectiveness of Drying on Residual Droplets, Microorganisms, and Biofilms in Gastrointestinal Endoscope Reprocessing: A Systematic Review. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2021; 2021:6615357. [PMID: 33927758 PMCID: PMC8049816 DOI: 10.1155/2021/6615357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2020] [Revised: 03/21/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite endoscope reprocessing, residual droplets remain in gastrointestinal endoscope working channels. Inadequate drying of gastrointestinal endoscope working channels may promote microbial reproduction and biofilm formation, increasing the risk of infection in patients. This review was designed to provide the current status of gastrointestinal endoscope drying, emphasize the importance of gastrointestinal endoscope drying, and evaluate the effectiveness of different drying methods of gastrointestinal endoscope in reducing residual droplets and microbial growth risk. METHODS A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting checklist. The PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, EMBASE, EBSCO, CNKI, CQVIP, and Wanfang Data databases were searched from 2010 to 2020 to identify eligible articles focused on methods of gastrointestinal endoscope drying and the status of endoscope drying. The following key points were analyzed: type of intervention, amount of residual droplets, major microbial types, and effectiveness of biofilm intervention. JBI quality assessment tool was used to determine bias risk for inclusion in the article. RESULTS This review included twelve articles. Two of the articles reported lack of drying of gastrointestinal endoscopes while the other ten reported residual droplets, microbial growth, and biofilm formation after different methods of drying. Four articles reported 0 to 4.55 residual droplets; four articles reported that the main microbial types were cocci and bacilli, most commonly Staphylococcus, Escherichia coli, Bacillus maltophilia, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa; and two reported that drying could effectively reduce biofilm regeneration. The type of intervention is as follows: automatic endoscopy reprocessor (AER), manual compressed air drying, and the Dri-Scope Aid for automatic drying and drying cabinet. CONCLUSIONS While endoscope reprocessing may not always be effective, an automatic endoscope reprocessor plus the Dri-Scope Aid with automatic drying over 10 min or storage in a drying cabinet for 72 h may be preferred.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hefeng Tian
- 1The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Jiao Sun
- 2School of Nursing, Jilin University, No. 965 Xinjiang Street, Changchun, Jilin Province 130021, China
| | - Shaoning Guo
- 1The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Xuanrui Zhu
- 1The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Han Feng
- 1The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Yijin Zhuang
- 1The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Xiu Wang
- 1The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Exner M, Bhattacharya S, Gebel J, Goroncy-Bermes P, Hartemann P, Heeg P, Ilschner C, Kramer A, Ling ML, Merkens W, Oltmanns P, Pitten F, Rotter M, Schmithausen RM, Sonntag HG, Steinhauer K, Trautmann M. Chemical disinfection in healthcare settings: critical aspects for the development of global strategies. GMS Hyg Infect Control 2020; 15:Doc36. [PMID: 33520601 PMCID: PMC7818848 DOI: 10.3205/dgkh000371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Chemical disinfection is an indispensable means of preventing infection. This holds true for healthcare settings, but also for all other settings where transmission of pathogens poses a potential health risk to humans and/or animals. Research on how to ensure effectiveness of disinfectants and the process of disinfection, as well as on when, how and where to implement disinfection precautions is an ongoing challenge requiring an interdisciplinary team effort. The valuable resources of active substances used for disinfection must be used wisely and their interaction with the target organisms and the environment should be evaluated and monitored closely, if we are to reliable reap the benefits of disinfection in future generations. In view of the global threat of communicable diseases and emerging and re-emerging pathogens and multidrug-resistant pathogens, the relevance of chemical disinfection is continually increasing. Although this consensus paper pinpoints crucial aspects for strategies of chemical disinfection in terms of the properties of disinfectant agents and disinfection practices in a particularly vulnerable group and setting, i.e., patients in healthcare settings, it takes a comprehensive, holistic approach to do justice to the complexity of the topic of disinfection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Exner
- Institute of Hygiene and Public Health, Bonn University, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Jürgen Gebel
- Institute of Hygiene and Public Health, Bonn University, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Philippe Hartemann
- Departement Environnement et Santé Publique S.E.R.E.S., Faculté de Médecine, Nancy, France
| | - Peter Heeg
- Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, University of Tübingen, Germany
| | - Carola Ilschner
- Institute of Hygiene and Public Health, Bonn University, Bonn, Germany
| | - Axel Kramer
- Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Germany
| | - Moi Lin Ling
- Infection Prevention & Control, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | | | | | - Frank Pitten
- IKI – Institut für Krankenhaushygiene & Infektionskontrolle GmbH, Gießen, Germany
| | | | | | - Hans-Günther Sonntag
- Institute of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, University of Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Rauwers AW, Voor In 't Holt AF, Buijs JG, de Groot W, Erler NS, Bruno MJ, Vos MC. Nationwide risk analysis of duodenoscope and linear echoendoscope contamination. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 92:681-691.e1. [PMID: 32502549 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.05.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2019] [Accepted: 05/10/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Contaminated duodenoscopes and linear echoendoscopes (DLEs) pose a risk for infectious outbreaks. To identify DLEs and reprocessing risk factors, we combined the data from the previously published nationwide cross-sectional PROCESS 1 study (Prevalence of contamination of complex endoscopes in the Netherlands) with the follow-up PROCESS 2 study. METHODS We invited all 74 Dutch DLE centers to sample ≥2 duodenoscopes during PROCESS 1, and all duodenoscopes as well as linear echoendoscopes during PROCESS 2. The studies took place 1 year after another. Local staff sampled each DLE at ≤6 sites according to uniform methods explained by online videos. We used 2 contamination definitions: (1) any microorganism with ≥20 colony-forming units (CFU)/20 mL (AM20) and (2) presence of microorganisms with GI or oral origin, independent of CFU count (MGOs). We assessed the factors of age and usage by performing an analysis of pooled data of both PROCESS studies; additional factors including reprocessing characteristics were only recorded in PROCESS 2. RESULTS Ninety-seven percent of all Dutch centers (72 of 74; PROCESS 1, 66; PROCESS 2, 61) participated in one of the studies, sampling 309 duodenoscopes and 64 linear echoendoscopes. In total, 54 (17%) duodenoscopes and 8 (13%) linear echoendoscopes were contaminated according to the AM20 definition. MGOs were detected on 47 (15%) duodenoscopes and 9 (14%) linear echoendoscopes. Contamination was not age or usage dependent (all P values ≥.27) and was not shown to differ between the reprocessing characteristics (all P values ≥.01). CONCLUSIONS In these nationwide studies, we found that DLE contamination was independent of age and usage. These results suggest that old and heavily used DLEs, if maintained correctly, have a similar risk for contamination as new DLEs. The prevalence of MGO contamination of ∼15% was similarly high for duodenoscopes as for linear echoendoscopes, rendering patients undergoing ERCP and EUS at risk for transmission of microorganisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arjan W Rauwers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anne F Voor In 't Holt
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jolanda G Buijs
- Staff Office Medical Devices, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Woutrinus de Groot
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nicole S Erler
- Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marco J Bruno
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Margreet C Vos
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Azizi J, Gavette M, Kulkarni K, Drosnock MA. Analysis: Overcoming Human Factors Challenges of Endoscope Culturing with Turbulent Fluid Flow. Biomed Instrum Technol 2020; 54:338-344. [PMID: 33049765 DOI: 10.2345/0899-8205-54.5.338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
|
19
|
Malvar C, Nguyen-Vu T, Shergill A, Chin YK, Baniya A, McAnanama M, Kaltenbach T, Soetikno R. The structure and delivery of a novel training course on endoscope reprocessing and standard precautions in the endoscopy unit. VideoGIE 2020; 5:176-179. [PMID: 32426562 PMCID: PMC7221475 DOI: 10.1016/j.vgie.2020.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Carmel Malvar
- Section of Gastroenterology, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California.,Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Tiffany Nguyen-Vu
- Section of Gastroenterology, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California.,Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Amandeep Shergill
- Section of Gastroenterology, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California.,Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Yung Ka Chin
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Aruna Baniya
- Section of Gastroenterology, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California
| | - Michelle McAnanama
- Section of Gastroenterology, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California
| | - Tonya Kaltenbach
- Section of Gastroenterology, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California.,Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California.,Advanced Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Mountain View, California
| | - Roy Soetikno
- Section of Gastroenterology, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California.,Advanced Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Mountain View, California.,Academy of Endoscopy, Woodside, California
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Trecca A, Catalano F, Bella A, Borghini R. Robotic colonoscopy: efficacy, tolerability and safety. Preliminary clinical results from a pilot study. Surg Endosc 2020; 34:1442-50. [PMID: 31932942 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-07332-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2019] [Accepted: 12/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robotic colonoscopy (RC) is a pneumatically-driven self-propelling platform (Endotics System®) able to investigate the colon, in order to reduce pain and discomfort. AIMS (1) to describe the progress in gaining experience and skills of a trainee in RC; (2) to show the clinical outcomes of RC. METHODS Pilot study. An experienced endoscopist started a training on RC whose progress was assessed comparing the results of 2 consecutive blocks of 27 (Group A) and 28 (Group B) procedures. CIR (Cecal Intubation Rate), CIT (Cecal Intubation Time) and Withdrawal Time (WT) were measured. Polyp Detection Rate (PDR), Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR) and Advanced Neoplasia Detection Rate (ANDR) were calculated. Possible adverse events were recorded. At the end of the procedure all patients completed a visual analog scale (VAS) to measure their perceived pain during RC and reported their willingness to repeat RC. RESULTS General CIR was 92.7%, reaching 100% in Group B. Comparing the two groups, CIT significantly decreased from 55 to 22 min (p value 0.0007), whereas procedures with CIT ≤ 20 min increased (p value 0.037). WT significatively reduced from 21 to 16 min (p value 0.0186). PDR was 40% (males 62.5%, females 14.3%). ADR was 26.7% (males 27.5%, females 14.3%). Most of patients judged the procedure as mild or no distress, with high willingness-to-repeat the RC (92.7%). CONCLUSIONS Our results about RC are encouraging as preliminary experience, with clear individual learning progress, accurate diagnosis in a painless or comfortable procedure and with possibility to remove polypoid lesions. Studies with larger populations are needed to confirm obtained results.
Collapse
|
21
|
|
22
|
Rauwers AW, Kwakman JA, Vos MC, Bruno MJ. Endoscope-associated infections: A brief summary of the current state and views toward the future. Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tgie.2019.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
|
23
|
Raphael K, Cerrone S, Sceppa E, Schneider P, Laumenede T, Lynch A, Sejpal DV. Improving patient safety in the endoscopy unit: utilization of remote video auditing to improve time-out compliance. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 90:424-429. [PMID: 31054910 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.04.237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2019] [Accepted: 04/20/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Patient and procedure verification, or the time-out process (TOP), is considered one of the most vital components of patient safety. It has long been a focus of intervention in the surgical community and recently was incorporated into the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines for safety in the GI endoscopy unit. The TOP has had limited attention in the endoscopy literature but remains an area for improvement in clinical endoscopy practice. The aim of this study was to identify barriers and improve TOP compliance rates in our endoscopy unit using remote video auditing (RVA). METHODS This was a single-center, prospective, pilot initiative in an endoscopy unit at a tertiary care academic medical center. Video cameras with offsite monitoring were installed in each procedure room in our endoscopy suite in November 2016. Baseline TOP compliance rates were audited with RVA over a 2-month period. A multidisciplinary quality improvement team reviewed the data, identified barriers to the TOP, and implemented actionable items in January 2017. TOP compliance rates were again monitored via RVA, and data were collected through October 2018. Pre- and postintervention TOP compliance rates were compared. RESULTS Over the baseline period, 692 procedures were audited and TOP compliance documented. Baseline TOP compliance rate was 69.6%. Identifiable barriers to TOP compliance included a lack of designated team member to lead TOP, inconsistent documentation of TOP, irrelevant safety checklist items not applicable to endoscopic procedures, and lack of patient safety culture. Actionable items implemented in response to these barriers included designation of a TOP leader, visual indication of initiation of TOP, creation of a concise endoscopy-specific safety checklist, and formal notification/education of the entire endoscopy team. Postintervention TOP compliance rates were then audited from January 2017 to October 2018 and included 12,008 procedures. The mean TOP compliance rate significantly improved from baseline (95.3% vs 69.6%; 95% confidence interval, 22.4-29.3; P < .0001). Additionally, the improvement was maintained throughout the entire postintervention observation period. CONCLUSIONS TOP compliance rates significantly improved in our endoscopy unit through the use of RVA and implementation of 4 actionable items. Future studies should evaluate the reproducibility of this method in other endoscopy units.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kara Raphael
- Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra-Northwell, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Northwell Health System, Manhasset, New York, USA
| | - Sara Cerrone
- Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra-Northwell, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Northwell Health System, Manhasset, New York, USA
| | - Edward Sceppa
- North American Partners Anesthesiology, Northwell Health System, Manhasset, New York, USA
| | - Patricia Schneider
- North Shore University Hospital Endoscopy, Patient Care Services, Northwell Health System, Manhasset, New York, USA
| | - Tara Laumenede
- North Shore University Hospital Endoscopy, Patient Care Services, Northwell Health System, Manhasset, New York, USA
| | - Ann Lynch
- North Shore University Hospital Endoscopy, Patient Care Services, Northwell Health System, Manhasset, New York, USA
| | - Divyesh V Sejpal
- Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra-Northwell, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Northwell Health System, Manhasset, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|