Phase I trial of carmustine plus O6-benzylguanine for patients with recurrent or progressive malignant glioma

Combination Early-Phase Trials of Anticancer Agents in Children and Adolescents

PURPOSE

There is an increasing need to evaluate innovative drugs for childhood cancer using combination strategies. Strong biological rationale and clinical experience suggest that multiple agents will be more efficacious than monotherapy for most diseases and may overcome resistance mechanisms and increase synergy. The process to evaluate these combination trials needs to maximize efficiency and should be agreed by all stakeholders.

METHODS

After a review of existing combination trial methodologies, regulatory requirements, and current results, a consensus among stakeholders was achieved.

RESULTS

Combinations of anticancer therapies should be developed on the basis of mechanism of action and robust preclinical evaluation, and may include data from adult clinical trials. The general principle for combination early-phase studies is that, when possible, clinical trials should be dose- and schedule-confirmatory rather than dose-exploratory, and every effort should be made to optimize doses early. Efficient early-phase combination trials should be seamless, including dose confirmation and randomized expansion. Dose evaluation designs for combinations depend on the extent of previous knowledge. If not previously evaluated, limited evaluation of monotherapy should be included in the same clinical trial as the combination. Randomized evaluation of a new agent plus standard therapy versus standard therapy is the most effective approach to isolate the effect and toxicity of the novel agent. Platform trials may be valuable in the evaluation of combination studies. Patient advocates and regulators should be engaged with investigators early in a proposed clinical development pathway and trial design must consider regulatory requirements.

CONCLUSION

An optimized, agreed approach to the design and evaluation of early-phase pediatric combination trials will accelerate drug development and benefit all stakeholders, most importantly children and adolescents with cancer.

Novel Imidazotetrazine Evades Known Resistance Mechanisms and Is Effective against Temozolomide-Resistant Brain Cancer in Cell Culture

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most lethal primary brain tumor. Currently, frontline treatment for primary GBM includes the DNA-methylating drug temozolomide (TMZ, of the imidazotetrazine class), while the optimal treatment for recurrent GBM remains under investigation. Despite its widespread use, a majority of GBM patients do not respond to TMZ therapy; expression of the O⁶-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) enzyme and loss of mismatch repair (MMR) function as the principal clinical modes of resistance to TMZ. Here, we describe a novel imidazotetrazine designed to evade resistance by MGMT while retaining suitable hydrolytic stability, allowing for effective prodrug activation and biodistribution. This dual-substituted compound, called CPZ, exhibits activity against cancer cells irrespective of MGMT expression and MMR status. CPZ has greater blood-brain barrier penetrance and comparable hematological toxicity relative to TMZ, while also matching its maximum tolerated dose in mice when dosed once-per-day over five days. The activity of CPZ is independent of the two principal mechanisms suppressing the effectiveness of TMZ, making it a promising new candidate for the treatment of GBM, especially those that are TMZ-resistant.

Novel Ion Channel Targets and Drug Delivery Tools for Controlling Glioblastoma Cell Invasiveness

Comprising more than half of all brain tumors, glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a leading cause of brain cancer-related deaths worldwide. A major clinical challenge is presented by the capacity of glioma cells to rapidly infiltrate healthy brain parenchyma, allowing the cancer to escape control by localized surgical resections and radiotherapies, and promoting recurrence in other brain regions. We propose that therapies which target cellular motility pathways could be used to slow tumor dispersal, providing a longer time window for administration of frontline treatments needed to directly eradicate the primary tumors. An array of signal transduction pathways are known to be involved in controlling cellular motility. Aquaporins (AQPs) and voltage-gated ion channels are prime candidates as pharmacological targets to restrain cell migration in glioblastoma. Published work has demonstrated AQPs 1, 4 and 9, as well as voltage-gated potassium, sodium and calcium channels, chloride channels, and acid-sensing ion channels are expressed in GBM and can influence processes of cell volume change, extracellular matrix degradation, cytoskeletal reorganization, lamellipodial and filopodial extension, and turnover of cell-cell adhesions and focal assembly sites. The current gap in knowledge is the identification of optimal combinations of targets, inhibitory agents, and drug delivery systems that will allow effective intervention with minimal side effects in the complex environment of the brain, without disrupting finely tuned activities of neuro-glial networks. Based on published literature, we propose that co-treatments using AQP inhibitors in addition to other therapies could increase effectiveness, overcoming some limitations inherent in current strategies that are focused on single mechanisms. An emerging interest in nanobodies as drug delivery systems could be instrumental for achieving the selective delivery of combinations of agents aimed at multiple key targets, which could enhance success in vivo.

Injectable postoperative enzyme-responsive hydrogels for reversing temozolomide resistance and reducing local recurrence after glioma operation

Glioma is the most aggressive primary malignant brain tumor. The eradication of the gliomas by performing neurosurgery has not been successful due to the diffuse nature of malignant gliomas. Temozolomide (TMZ) is the first-line agent in treating gliomas after surgery, and its therapeutic efficacy is limited mainly due to the high activity levels of the DNA repair protein O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) in glioma cells. Herein, we used an injectable matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) enzyme responsive hydrogel that loaded TMZ and O6-benzylamine (BG) (MGMT inhibitor) for eradicating residual TMZ-resistant gliomas after surgery. The hydrogels exhibited three features: (1) TMZ and BG could be encapsulated within the hydrophobic lamellae of the hydrogel to form Tm (TMZ + BG) hydrogels; (2) The hydrogels could release TMZ and BG in response to the high concentration of MMP enzymes after glioma surgery; (3) The hydrogels could increase local TMZ concentration and reduce side effects of BG. In vivo, the Tm (TMZ + BG) hydrogels inhibited the MGMT expression and sensitized TMZ-resistant glioma cells to TMZ. Moreover, the Tm (TMZ + BG) hydrogels effectively reduced the recurrence of TMZ-resistant glioma after surgery and significantly enhanced the efficiency of TMZ to inhibit glioma growth. Together, these data suggest that an MMP-responsive hydrogel is a promising localized drug delivery method to inhibit TMZ-resistant glioma recurrence after surgery.

Targeting DNA repair in gliomas

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Gliomas represent a disparate group of malignancies with varying clinical outcomes despite a tremendous amount of time, effort, and resources dedicated to their management and understanding. The most aggressive entity, glioblastoma, has a dismal prognosis with poor local control despite intense local and systemic treatment, including radiation therapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Given the heterogeneity in genotype, phenotype, and patient outcomes, researchers and clinicians have turned their attention toward attacking DNA damage response and repair mechanisms in gliomas in an effort to develop novel chemo and radiosensitizers. However, despite extensive work in both the laboratory and the clinic, no sensitizers have yet to emerge as clear options in the treatment of glioma, often because of meager preclinical data or an inability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier.

SUMMARY

This review will examine current understanding of molecular DNA repair targets in glioma and their potential exploitation to improve local control and, ultimately, overall survival of patients afflicted with these diseases.

Dose-dense temozolomide for recurrent high-grade gliomas: a single-center retrospective study

There are limited treatment modalities after high-grade gliomas recurrence. MGMT depletion modulated by dose-dense temozolomide (ddTMZ) remains a debated therapy for initial TMZ responders. Patients were selected retrospectively from our practice with diagnosis of high-grade gliomas (WHO grade III or IV), and were followed since the start of ddTMZ until death or change of therapy. Twenty-one patients were reviewed, with a median age of 47 (25-61) years and a median of 5.8 (1.5-38.8) cycles of ddTMZ. The majority were males (71.4%). Sixty-six percent received 21 on/28 off ddTMZ schedule, 28.6% daily, and 1 patient received a 7 days on/7 days off schedule. IDH mutation status was available for 18 (85.7%) patients, with 7 (33.3%) IDH mutant and 11 (52.5%) IDH wild type. MGMT methylation was assessed in 6 (28.6%) of the patients, being MGMT methylated in 3 (14.3%) patients, and non-methylated in 3 (14.3%) patients. The majority of patients (57.1%) were receiving ddTMZ in addition to other forms of therapy, including either bevacizumab (38.1%) or tumor-treating fields (TTFields) (19.1%). Overall ddTMZ was well tolerated, with few adverse events reported. The estimated median overall survival after ddTMZ start was 11 months. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6 months. Outcomes did not vary between patients receiving ddTMZ alone or those using TTFields or bevacizumab as concomitant therapy, but there was a trend to longer survival with the use of concomitant TTFields. Our results demonstrate benefit of ddTMZ after previous treatment with standard TMZ dosing with no apparent increase in treatment-related toxicities. In summary, ddTMZ should be considered in TMZ responsive patients and warrants further investigation.

The specific role of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase inhibitors in cancer chemotherapy

The DNA repair protein, O⁶-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT), can confer resistance to guanine O⁶-alkylating agents. Therefore, inhibition of resistant MGMT protein is a practical approach to increase the anticancer effects of such alkylating agents. Numerous small molecule inhibitors were synthesized and exhibited potential MGMT inhibitory activities. Although they were nontoxic alone, they also inhibited MGMT in normal tissues, thereby enhancing the side effects of chemotherapy. Therefore, strategies for tumor-specific MGMT inhibition have been proposed, including local drug delivery and tumor-activated prodrugs. Over-expression of MGMT in hematopoietic stem cells to protect bone marrow from the toxic effects of chemotherapy is also a feasible selection. The future prospects and challenges of MGMT inhibitors in cancer chemotherapy were also discussed.

Biodegradable hybrid-structured nanofibrous membrane supported chemoprotective gene therapy enhances chemotherapy tolerance and efficacy in malignant glioma rats

Chemotherapy is ineffective for treating malignant glioma (MG) because of the low therapeutic levels of pharmaceuticals in tumour tissues and the well-known tumour resistance. The resistance to alkylators is modulated by the DNA repair protein O⁶-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase (AGT). O⁶-benzylguanine (O⁶-BG) can irreversibly inactivate AGT by competing with O⁶-methylguanine and has been confirmed to increase the therapeutic activity of alkylators. We developed hybrid-structured poly[(d,l)-lactide-co-glycolide] nanofibrous membranes (HSNMs) that enable the sequential and sustained release of O⁶-BG and two alkylators (carmustine and temozolomide [TMZ]). HSNMs were surgically instilled into the cerebral cavity of pathogen-free rats and F98 glioma-bearing rats. The release behaviours of loaded drugs were quantified by using high-performance liquid chromatography. The treatment results were compared with the rats treated with intraperitoneal injection of O⁶-BG combined with surgical implantation of carmustine wafer and oral TMZ. The HSNMs revealed a sequential drug release behaviour with the elution of high drug concentrations of O⁶-BG in the early phase, followed by high levels of two alkylators. All drug concentrations remained high for over 14 weeks. Tumour growth was slower and the mean survival time was significantly prolonged in the HSNM-treated group. Biodegradable HSNMs can enhance therapeutic efficacy and prevent toxic systemic effects.

Clinical Trial of MGMT(P140K) Gene Therapy in the Treatment of Pediatric Patients with Brain Tumors

Gene transfer targeting hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) in children has shown sustained therapeutic benefit in the treatment of genetic diseases affecting the immune system, most notably in severe combined immunodeficiencies affecting T-cell function. The HSC compartment has also been successfully targeted using gene transfer in children with genetic diseases affecting the central nervous system, such as metachromatic leukodystrophy and adrenoleukodystrophy. HSCs are also a target for genetic modification in strategies aiming to confer drug resistance to chemotherapy agents so as to reduce off-target toxicity, and to allow for chemotherapy dose escalation with the possibility of enhanced therapeutic benefit. In a trial of this strategy in adult glioma patients, significant engraftment of gene-modified HSCs expressing a mutant of the DNA repair protein O6-methyl-guanine-methyl-transferase (MGMT(P140K)) showed potential in conferring drug resistance against the combined effect of O6-benzylguanine (O6BG)/temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy. The aim was to test the safety and feasibility of this approach in children with poor prognosis brain tumors. In this Phase I trial, seven patients received gene-modified HSC following myelo-suppressive conditioning, but with only transient low-level engraftment of MGMT(P140K) gene-modified cells detectable in four patients. All patients received O6BG/TMZ chemotherapy following infusion of gene-modified cells, with five patients eligible for chemotherapy dose escalation, though in the absence of demonstrable transgene-mediated chemoprotection. Since all gene-modified cell products met the criteria for release and assays for engraftment potential met expected outcome measures, inadequate cell dose, conditioning chemotherapy, and/or underlying bone-marrow function may have contributed to the lack of sustained engraftment of gene-modified cells. We were able to demonstrate safe conduct of a technically complex Phase I study encompassing manufacture of the gene therapy vector, genetically modified cells, and a drug product specifically for the trial in compliance with both local and national regulatory requirements.

MGMT inactivation and clinical response in newly diagnosed GBM patients treated with Gliadel

We examined the relationship between the O(6)-methylguanine-methyltransferase (MGMT) methylation status and clinical outcomes in newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients who were treated with Gliadel wafers (Eisai, Tokyo, Japan). MGMT promoter methylation has been associated with increased survival among patients with GBM who are treated with various alkylating agents. MGMT promoter methylation, in DNA from 122 of 160 newly diagnosed GBM patients treated with Gliadel, was determined by a quantitative methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction, and was correlated with overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). The MGMT promoter was methylated in 40 (32.7%) of 122 patients. The median OS was 13.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.0-14.5) and RFS was 9.4 months (95% CI 7.8-10.2). After adjusting for age, Karnofsky performance score, extent of resection, temozolomide (TMZ) and radiation therapy (RT), the newly diagnosed GBM patients with MGMT methylation had a 15% reduced mortality risk, compared to patients with unmethylated MGMT (hazard ratio 0.85; 95% CI 0.56-1.31; p=0.46). The patients aged over 70 years with MGMT methylation had a significantly longer median OS of 13.5 months, compared to 7.6 months in patients with unmethylated MGMT (p=0.027). A significant difference was also found in older patients, with a median RFS of 13.1 versus 7.6 months for methylated and unmethylated MGMT groups, respectively (p=0.01). Methylation of the MGMT promoter in newly diagnosed GBM patients treated with Gliadel, RT and TMZ, was associated with significantly improved OS compared to the unmethylated population. In elderly patients, methylation of the MGMT promoter was associated with significantly better OS and RFS.

A Phase III study of radiation therapy (RT) and O⁶-benzylguanine + BCNU versus RT and BCNU alone and methylation status in newly diagnosed glioblastoma and gliosarcoma: Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) study S0001

AIMS

To determine the efficacy of methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) depletion + BCNU [1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1- nitrosourea: carmustine] therapy and the impact of methylation status in adults with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and gliosarcoma.

METHODS

Methylation analysis was performed on GBM patients with adequate tissue samples. Patients with newly diagnosed GBM or gliosarcoma were eligible for this Phase III open-label clinical trial. At registration, patients were randomized to Arm 1, which consisted of therapy with O(6)-benzylguanine (O(6)-BG) + BCNU 40 mg/m(2) (reduced dose) + radiation therapy (RT) (O6BG + BCNU arm), or Arm 2, which consisted of therapy with BCNU 200 mg/m(2) + RT (BCNU arm).

RESULTS

A total of 183 patients with newly diagnosed GBM or gliosarcoma from 42 U.S. institutions were enrolled in this study. Of these, 90 eligible patients received O(6)-BG + BCNU + RT and 89 received BCNU + RT. The trial was halted at the first interim analysis in accordance with the guidelines for stopping the study due to futility (<40 % improvement among patients on the O6BG + BCNU arm). Following adjustment for stratification factors, there was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) between the two groups (one sided p = 0.94 and p = 0.88, respectively). Median OS was 11 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 8-13] months for patients in the O6BG + BCNU arm and 10 (95 % CI 8-12) months for those in the BCNU arm. PFS was 4 months for patients in each arm. Adverse events were reported in both arms, with significantly more grade 4 and 5 events in the experimental arm.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of O(6)-BG to the standard regimen of radiation and BCNU for the treatment patients with newly diagnosed GBM and gliosarcoma did not provide added benefit and in fact caused additional toxicity.

Progression of O⁶-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase and temozolomide resistance in cancer research

Temozolomide (TMZ) is an alkylating agent that is widely used in chemotherapy for cancer. A key mechanism of resistance to TMZ is the overexpression of O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT). MGMT specifically repairs the DNA O(6)-methylation damage induced by TMZ and irreversibly inactivates TMZ. Regulation of MGMT expression and research regarding the mechanism of TMZ resistance will help rationalize the clinical use of TMZ. In this review, we provide an overview of recent advances in the field, with particular emphasis on MGMT structure, function, expression regulation, and the association between MGMT and resistance to TMZ.

New treatment strategies for malignant gliomas

Malignant gliomas are the most prevalent type of primary brain tumor in adults. Despite progress in brain tumor therapy, the prognosis of malignant glioma patients remains dismal. The median survival of patients with glioblastoma multiforme, the most common grade of malignant glioma, is 10-12 months. Conventional therapy of surgery, radiation and chemotherapy is largely palliative. Essentially, tumor recurrence is inevitable. Salvage treatments upon recurrence are palliative at best and rarely provide significant survival benefit. Therapies targeting the underlying molecular pathogenesis of brain tumors are urgently required. Common genetic abnormalities in malignant glioma specimens are associated with aberrant activation or suppression of cellular signal transduction pathways and resistance to radiation and chemotherapy. Several low molecular weight signal transduction inhibitors have been examined in preclinical and clinical malignant glioma trials. The efficacy of these agents as monotherapies has been modest, at best; however, small subsets of patients who harbor specific genetic changes in their tumors may display favorable clinical responses to defined small molecule inhibitors. Multitargeted kinase inhibitors or combinations of agents targeting different mitogenic pathways may overcome the resistance of tumors to single-agent targeted therapies. Well designed studies of small molecule kinase inhibitors will include assessment of safety, drug delivery, target inhibition and correlative biomarkers to define mechanisms of response or resistance to these agents. Predictive biomarkers will enrich for patients most likely to respond in future clinical trials. Additional clinical studies will combine novel targeted therapies with radiation, chemotherapies and immunotherapies.

The role of MGMT testing in clinical practice: a report of the association for molecular pathology

Recent advances in modern molecular technologies allow for the examination and measurement of cancer-related genomic changes. The number of molecular tests for evaluation of diagnostic, prognostic, or predictive markers is expected to increase. In recent years, O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation has been firmly established as a biomarker in patients diagnosed with gliomas, for both clinical trials and routine clinical management. Similarly, molecular markers, such as loss of heterozygosity (LOH) for 1p/19q have already demonstrated clinical utility in treatment of oligodendroglial tumors, and others might soon show clinical utility. Furthermore, nonrandom associations are being discovered among MGMT, 1p/19q LOH, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations, and other tumor-specific modifications that could possibly enhance our ability to predict outcome and response to therapy. While pathologists are facing new and more complicated requests for clinical genomic testing, clinicians are challenged with increasing numbers of molecular data coming from molecular pathology and genomic medicine. Both pathologists and oncologists need to understand the clinical utility of molecular tests and test results, including issues of turnaround time, and their impact on the application of targeted treatment regimens. This review summarizes the existing data that support the rationale for MGMT promoter methylation testing and possibly other molecular testing in clinically defined glioma subtypes. Various molecular testing platforms for evaluation of MGMT methylation status are also discussed.

Phase I clinical trial of O6-benzylguanine and topical carmustine in the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, mycosis fungoides type

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the toxic effects and maximum tolerated dose of topical carmustine [1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea] following intravenous O6-benzylguanine in the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), and to determine pharmacodynamics of O6-alkylguanine DNA alkyltransferase activity in treated CTCL lesions.

DESIGN

Open-label, dose-escalation, phase I trial.

SETTING

Dermatology outpatient clinic and clinical research unit at a university teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

A total of 21 adult patients (11 male, 10 female)with early-stage (IA-IIA) refractory CTCL, mycosis fungoides type, treated with topical carmustine following intravenous O6-benzylguanine.

INTERVENTION

Treatment once every 2 weeks with 120 mg/m(2) intravenous O6-benzylguanine followed 1 hour later by whole-body, low-dose topical carmustine starting at 10 mg, with 10-mg incremental dose-escalation in 3 patient cohorts. Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma lesional skin biopsy specimens were taken at baseline and 6 hours, 24 hours, and 1 week after the first O6-benzylguanine infusion for analysis of O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase activity.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Clinical response measured by physical examination and severity-weighted assessment tool measurements, safety data acquired by review of adverse events at study visits, and O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase activity in treated lesion skin biopsy specimens.

RESULTS

A minimal toxic effect was observed through the 40-mg carmustine dose level with 76% of adverse events being grade 1 based on the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Mean baseline O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase activity in CTCL lesions was 3 times greater than in normal controls and was diminished by a median of 100% at 6 and 24 hours following O6-benzylguanine with recovery at 1 week. Clinical disease reduction correlated positively with O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase activity at 168 hours (P=.02) and inversely with area under the curve of O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase over 1 week (P=.01). Twelve partial responses and 4 complete responses were observed (overall response, 76% [95% CI, 0.55-0.89]). Five patients discontinued therapy owing to adverse events with a possible, probable, or definite relationship to the study drug.

CONCLUSION

O6-benzylguanine significantly depletes O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase in CTCL lesions and in combination with topical carmustine is well tolerated and shows meaningful clinical responses in CTCL at markedly reduced total carmustine treatment doses.

Extended survival of glioblastoma patients after chemoprotective HSC gene therapy

Chemotherapy with alkylating agents for treating malignant disease results in myelosuppression that can significantly limit dose escalation and potential clinical efficacy. Gene therapy using mutant methylguanine methyltransferase (P140K) gene-modified hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells may circumvent this problem by abrogating the toxic effects of chemotherapy on hematopoietic cells. However, this approach has not been evaluated clinically. Here, we show efficient polyclonal engraftment of autologous P140K-modified hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells in three patients with glioblastoma. Increases in P140K-modified cells after transplant indicate selection of gene-modified hematopoietic repopulating cells. Longitudinal retroviral integration site (RIS) analysis identified more than 12,000 unique RISs in the three glioblastoma patients, with multiple clones present in the peripheral blood of each patient throughout multiple chemotherapy cycles. To assess safety, we monitored RIS distribution over the course of chemotherapy treatments. Two patients exhibited emergence of prominent clones harboring RISs associated with the intronic coding region of PRDM16 (PR domain-containing 16) or the 3' untranslated region of HMGA2 (high-mobility group A2) genes with no adverse clinical outcomes. All three patients surpassed the median survival for glioblastoma patients with poor prognosis, with one patient alive and progression-free more than 2 years after diagnosis. Thus, transplanted P140K-expressing hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells are chemoprotective, potentially maximizing the drug dose that can be administered.

Humanized bone marrow mouse model as a preclinical tool to assess therapy-mediated hematotoxicity

PURPOSE

Preclinical in vivo studies can help guide the selection of agents and regimens for clinical testing. However, one of the challenges in screening anticancer therapies is the assessment of off-target human toxicity. There is a need for in vivo models that can simulate efficacy and toxicities of promising therapeutic regimens. For example, hematopoietic cells of human origin are particularly sensitive to a variety of chemotherapeutic regimens, but in vivo models to assess potential toxicities have not been developed. In this study, a xenograft model containing humanized bone marrow is utilized as an in vivo assay to monitor hematotoxicity.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

A proof-of-concept, temozolomide-based regimen was developed that inhibits tumor xenograft growth. This regimen was selected for testing because it has been previously shown to cause myelosuppression in mice and humans. The dose-intensive regimen was administered to NOD.Cg-Prkdc(scid)IL2rg(tm1Wjl)/Sz (NOD/SCID/γchain(null)), reconstituted with human hematopoietic cells, and the impact of treatment on human hematopoiesis was evaluated.

RESULTS

The dose-intensive regimen resulted in significant decreases in growth of human glioblastoma xenografts. When this regimen was administered to mice containing humanized bone marrow, flow cytometric analyses indicated that the human bone marrow cells were significantly more sensitive to treatment than the murine bone marrow cells and that the regimen was highly toxic to human-derived hematopoietic cells of all lineages (progenitor, lymphoid, and myeloid).

CONCLUSIONS

The humanized bone marrow xenograft model described has the potential to be used as a platform for monitoring the impact of anticancer therapies on human hematopoiesis and could lead to subsequent refinement of therapies prior to clinical evaluation.

Analysis of self-inactivating lentiviral vector integration sites and flanking gene expression in human peripheral blood progenitor cells after alkylator chemotherapy

Abstract Hematotoxicity is a major and frequently dose-limiting side effect of chemotherapy. Retroviral methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT; EC 2.1.1.63) gene transfer to primitive hematopoietic progenitor cells (CD34(+) cells) might allow the application of high-dose alkylator chemotherapy with almost mild to absent myelosuppression. Because gammaretroviral vector integration was found in association with malignant or increased proliferation, novel lentiviral vectors with self-inactivating (SIN) capacity might display a safer option for future gene transfer studies. We assessed the influence of chemoselection on integration patterns in 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU)-treated and untreated human CD34(+) cells transduced with an SIN lentiviral vector carrying the MGMT(P140K) transgene, using ligation-mediated PCR (LM-PCR) and next-generation sequencing. In addition, for the first time, the local influence of the lentiviral provirus on the expression of hit and flanking genes in human CD34(+) cells was analyzed at a clonal level. For each colony, the integration site was detected (LM-PCR) and analyzed (QuickMap), and the expression of hit and flanking genes was measured (quantitative RT-PCR). Analyses of both treated and untreated CD34(+) cells revealed preferential integration into genes. Integration patterns in BCNU-treated cells showed mild, but not significant, differences compared with those found in untreated CD34(+) cells. Most importantly, when analyzing the local influence of the provirus, we saw no significant deregulation of the integration-flanking genes. These findings demonstrate that SIN vector-mediated gene transfer might display a feasible and possibly safe option for MGMT(P140K)-mediated chemoprotection of CD34(+) cells.

Plasma and CNS pharmacokinetics of O4-benzylfolic acid (O4BF) and metabolite in a non-human primate model

PURPOSE

O(6)-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase (AGT) repairs DNA damage from alkylating agents by transferring the alkyl adducts from the O(6)-position of guanine in DNA to AGT. The folate analog O(4)-benzylfolic acid (O(4)BF) is an inhibitor of AGT with reported selectivity of the alpha-folate receptor in tumors. We studied plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pharmacokinetics and CSF penetration of O(4)BF in a non-human primate model.

METHODS

Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) received O(4)BF (10-50 mg/kg) intravenously, and serial blood and CSF samples were obtained. Analyte concentrations in plasma were measured by HPLC/photo diode array, and an HPLC/MS/MS assay was used for CSF samples.

RESULTS

A putative metabolite of O(4)BF was detected in plasma and CSF. O(4)BF and the metabolite inactivated purified AGT with ED(50) of 0.04 mcM. The median clearance of O(4)BF was 8 ml/min/kg and half-life was 1.1 h. The metabolite had a substantially longer half-life (>20 h) and greater AUC than O(4)BF. The AUC of the metabolite increased disproportionately to the dose of O(4)BF, suggesting saturable elimination. CSF penetration of O(4)BF and its metabolite was < 1%. At the 50 mg/kg dose level, the C(max) in CSF for O(4)BF was less than 0.09 mcM and for the metabolite the C(max) ranged from 0.02 to 0.04 mcM (O(4)BF equivalents).

CONCLUSIONS

Concentrations of O(4)BF and the metabolite in CSF exceeded the ED(50) of AGT; however, recently reported lack of receptor specificity and pharmacokinetic data suggesting saturable elimination of both O(4)BF and its metabolite may limit dose-escalation and future clinical development of this agent.

Targeting O⁶-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase with specific inhibitors as a strategy in cancer therapy

O (6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) repairs the cancer chemotherapy-relevant DNA adducts, O (6)-methylguanine and O (6)-chloroethylguanine, induced by methylating and chloroethylating anticancer drugs, respectively. These adducts are cytotoxic, and given the overwhelming evidence that MGMT is a key factor in resistance, strategies for inactivating MGMT have been pursued. A number of drugs have been shown to inactivate MGMT in cells, human tumour models and cancer patients, and O (6)-benzylguanine and O (6)-[4-bromothenyl]guanine have been used in clinical trials. While these agents show no side effects per se, they also inactivate MGMT in normal tissues and hence exacerbate the toxic side effects of the alkylating drugs, requiring dose reduction. This might explain why, in any of the reported trials, the outcome has not been improved by their inclusion. It is, however, anticipated that, with the availability of tumour targeting strategies and hematopoetic stem cell protection, MGMT inactivators hold promise for enhancing the effectiveness of alkylating agent chemotherapy.

Chemoprotection of human hematopoietic stem cells by simultaneous lentiviral overexpression of multidrug resistance 1 and O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase(P140K)

Myelotoxicity is a dose-limiting effect of many chemotherapeutic regimens. Thus, there is great interest in protecting human hematopoietic stem cells by the transfer of drug resistance genes. The main focus of this study was the simultaneous overexpression of multidrug resistance 1 (MDR1) and the O(6)-benzylguanine (O(6)-BG)-resistant mutant MGMT(P140K) (O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase) with a bicistronic lentiviral vector (HR'SIN-MDR1-IRES-MGMT(P140K)), with regard to the capability to convey chemoprotection in the leukemia cell line, HL60, and human hematopoietic stem cells (CD34(+)). Combination therapy with O(6)-BG/1-(2-chloroethyl)-3-(4-amino-2-methylpyrimidine-5-yl)methyl-1-nitrosourea) (ACNU) plus paclitaxel showed a significant survival advantage of HL60 cells transduced with this combination vector. In CD34(+) cells, monotherapy with O(6)-BG/temozolomide (TMZ) resulted in an increased percentage of MGMT-positive cells (vs untreated cells) after transduction with HR'SIN-MDR1-IRES-MGMT(P140K) (28.3%). For combination therapy with O(6)-BG/temozolomide plus paclitaxel the increase was higher with the combination vector (52.8%) than with a vector expressing MGMT(P140K) solely (29.1%). With regard to MDR1-positive cells the protective effect of the combination vector (88.5%) was comparable to the single vector HR'SIN-MDR1 (90.0%) for monotherapy with paclitaxel and superior for combination therapy with O(6)-BG/temozolomide plus paclitaxel (84.6 vs 69.7%). In conclusion, the combination vector presents simultaneous protective effects of two drug-resistance genes, offering an opportunity to increase the cancer therapeutic index.

In vitro comparison of O4-benzylfolate modulated, BCNU-induced toxicity in human bone marrow using CFU-GM and tumor cell lines

2-Amino-O4-benzylpteridine derivatives inactivate the human DNA repair protein O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase and have been tested as modulators of alkylating agent chemotherapy. Recently, the therapeutic potential of O4-benzylfolate (O4BF) in modulating bis-chloroethylnitrosourea (BCNU) toxicity was demonstrated in vitro using human HT29 and KB tumor lines. The current studies replicated the previous findings in HT29 and KB cells using ATP as an endpoint. However, the effective treatment conditions were severely toxic to human neutrophil progenitors called CFU-granulocyte/macrophage (CFU-GM), which could not tolerate > or =40 microM BCNU at any O4BF concentration. A lower BCNU concentration (10 microM) in combination with O4BF (2-100 microM) was only moderately tumoricidal. To screen for conditions tolerated by CFU-GM, bone marrow (BM) cells were pre-incubated (5 h) with O4BF, co-treated with O4BF and BCNU (42 h), washed, and plated to quantify CFU-GM survival. O4BF at 2 or 5 microM progressively lowered the inhibitory concentrations (ICs) for BCNU, but further increases in O4BF concentrations did not. Increasing O4BF concentrations with constant BCNU (10 microM) under the same prolonged exposure as in the human marrow study achieved only modest tumoricidal effects. In summary, the unexpected finding that normal BM cells are impacted by an agent developed to target malignant tissue refutes speculation that normal beta-folate receptor expressing hematopoietic cells will be spared. Further, the validated IC90 endpoint from the huCFU-GM assay has provided a reference point for judging the potential therapeutic effectiveness of this investigational combination in man using in vitro assays.

Changing the clinical picture of challenging tumors: tales becoming reality?

The treatment of neoplastic diseases has become increasingly dependent on tumor biology and is focused on targeted therapy. Understanding complex networks of intracellular signaling pathways, blockades of specific targets and a myriad of other approaches has brought new fuel to the battle against many types of cancer. Unfortunately, the degree of benefit achieved in this new era of cancer treatment has not been distributed homogeneously among the different disease types. Neoplasms with lower incidence rates, but that are also highly challenging, are not consistently given due attention by research leaders. This article aims to evaluate new insights and potential gains obtained with new therapies in a particular group of tumors: those rarely debated in clinical practice, but which still pose a considerable challenge to clinical oncology.

Phase II trial of Gliadel plus O6-benzylguanine in adults with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme

PURPOSE

This phase II trial was designed to define the efficacy of Gliadel wafers in combination with an infusion of O6-benzylguanine (O6-BG) that suppresses tumor O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase (AGT) levels in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme for 5 days and to evaluate the safety of this combination therapy.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

This was a phase II, open-label, single center trial. On gross total resection of the tumor, up to eight Gliadel wafers were implanted. Bolus infusion of O6-BG was administered at 120 mg/m2 over 1 hour on days 1, 3, and 5, along with a continuous infusion at 30 mg/m2/d. The primary end points were 6-month overall survival (OS) and safety, and the secondary end points were 1-year, 2-year, and median OS.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients were accrued. The 6-month OS was 82% [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 72-93%]. The 1- and 2-year OS rates were 47% (95% CI, 35-63%) and 10% (95% CI, 3-32%), respectively. The median OS was 50.3 weeks (95% CI, 36.1-69.4 weeks). Treatment-related toxicity with this drug combination included grade 3 hydrocephalus (9.6%), grade 3 cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak (19.2%), and grade 3 CSF/brain infection (13.4%).

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of implanted Gliadel wafers may be improved with the addition of O6-BG. Although systemically administered O6-BG can be coadministered with Gliadel wafers safely, it may increase the risk of hydrocephalus, CSF leak, and CSF/brain infection. Future trials are required to verify that inhibition of tumor AGT levels by O6-BG results in increased efficacy of Gliadel wafers without added toxicity.

Phase II trial of temozolomide plus o6-benzylguanine in adults with recurrent, temozolomide-resistant malignant glioma

PURPOSE

This phase II trial was designed to define the role of O(6)-benzylguanine (O(6)-BG) in restoring temozolomide sensitivity in patients with recurrent or progressive, temozolomide-resistant malignant glioma and to evaluate the safety of administering O(6)-BG in combination with temozolomide.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were accrued into two independent strata on the basis of histology: glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and anaplastic glioma. Both temozolomide and O(6)-BG were administered on day 1 of a 28-day treatment cycle. Patients were administered a 1-hour O(6)-BG infusion at a dose of 120 mg/m(2) followed immediately by a 48-hour infusion at a dose of 30 mg/m(2)/d. Temozolomide was administered orally within 60 minutes of the end of the 1-hour O(6)-BG infusion at a dose of 472 mg/m(2). The primary end point was objective response rate. Secondary end points included progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety.

RESULTS

Sixty-six of 67 patients who enrolled were treated with temozolomide and O(6)-BG. One of 34 patients (3%) with GBM (95% CI, 0.1% to 15%) and five of 32 assessable patients (16%) with anaplastic glioma (95% CI, 5% to 33%) were responders. The most commonly reported adverse events were grade 4 hematologic events experienced in 48% of the patients.

CONCLUSION

O(6)-BG when added to a 1-day dosing regimen of temozolomide was able to restore temozolomide sensitivity in patients with temozolomide-resistant anaplastic glioma, but there seemed to be no significant restoration of temozolomide sensitivity in patients with temozolomide-resistant GBM.

Correlation of O6-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation with clinical outcomes in glioblastoma and clinical strategies to modulate MGMT activity

Resistance to alkylating agents via direct DNA repair by O(6)-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) remains a significant barrier to the successful treatment of patients with malignant glioma. The relative expression of MGMT in the tumor may determine response to alkylating agents, and epigenetic silencing of the MGMT gene by promoter methylation plays an important role in regulating MGMT expression in gliomas. MGMT promoter methylation is correlated with improved progression-free and overall survival in patients treated with alkylating agents. Strategies to overcome MGMT-mediated chemoresistance are being actively investigated. These include treatment with nontoxic pseudosubstrate inhibitors of MGMT, such as O(6)-benzylguanine, or RNA interference-mediated gene silencing of MGMT. However, systemic application of MGMT inhibitors is limited by an increase in hematologic toxicity. Another strategy is to deplete MGMT activity in tumor tissue using a dose-dense temozolomide schedule. These alternative schedules are well tolerated; however, it remains unclear whether they are more effective than the standard dosing regimen or whether they effectively deplete MGMT activity in tumor tissue. Of note, not all patients with glioblastoma having MGMT promoter methylation respond to alkylating agents, and even those who respond will inevitably experience relapse. Herein we review the data supporting MGMT as a major mechanism of chemotherapy resistance in malignant gliomas and describe ongoing studies that are testing resistance-modulating strategies.

Reciprocal relationship between O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase P140K expression level and chemoprotection of hematopoietic stem cells

Retroviral-mediated delivery of the P140K mutant O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT(P140K)) into hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) has been proposed as a means to protect against dose-limiting myelosuppressive toxicity ensuing from chemotherapy combining O(6)-alkylating agents (e.g., temozolomide) with pseudosubstrate inhibitors (such as O(6)-benzylguanine) of endogenous MGMT. Because detoxification of O(6)-alkylguanine adducts by MGMT is stoichiometric, it has been suggested that higher levels of MGMT will afford better protection to gene-modified HSC. However, accomplishing this goal would potentially be in conflict with current efforts in the gene therapy field, which aim to incorporate weaker enhancer elements to avoid insertional mutagenesis. Using a panel of self-inactivating gamma-retroviral vectors that express a range of MGMT(P140K) activity, we show that MGMT(P140K) expression by weaker cellular promoter/enhancers is sufficient for in vivo protection/selection following treatment with O(6)-benzylguanine/temozolomide. Conversely, the highest level of MGMT(P140K) activity did not promote efficient in vivo protection despite mediating detoxification of O(6)-alkylguanine adducts. Moreover, very high expression of MGMT(P140K) was associated with a competitive repopulation defect in HSC. Mechanistically, we show a defect in cellular proliferation associated with elevated expression of MGMT(P140K), but not wild-type MGMT. This proliferation defect correlated with increased localization of MGMT(P140K) to the nucleus/chromatin. These data show that very high expression of MGMT(P140K) has a deleterious effect on cellular proliferation, engraftment, and chemoprotection. These studies have direct translational relevance to ongoing clinical gene therapy studies using MGMT(P140K), whereas the novel mechanistic findings are relevant to the basic understanding of DNA repair by MGMT.

DNA repair proteins as molecular targets for cancer therapeutics

Cancer therapeutics include an ever-increasing array of tools at the disposal of clinicians in their treatment of this disease. However, cancer is a tough opponent in this battle and current treatments which typically include radiotherapy, chemotherapy and surgery are not often enough to rid the patient of his or her cancer. Cancer cells can become resistant to the treatments directed at them and overcoming this drug resistance is an important research focus. Additionally, increasing discussion and research is centering on targeted and individualized therapy. While a number of approaches have undergone intensive and close scrutiny as potential approaches to treat and kill cancer (signaling pathways, multidrug resistance, cell cycle checkpoints, anti-angiogenesis, etc.), much less work has focused on blocking the ability of a cancer cell to recognize and repair the damaged DNA which primarily results from the front line cancer treatments; chemotherapy and radiation. More recent studies on a number of DNA repair targets have produced proof-of-concept results showing that selective targeting of these DNA repair enzymes has the potential to enhance and augment the currently used chemotherapeutic agents and radiation as well as overcoming drug resistance. Some of the targets identified result in the development of effective single-agent anti-tumor molecules. While it is inherently convoluted to think that inhibiting DNA repair processes would be a likely approach to kill cancer cells, careful identification of specific DNA repair proteins is increasingly appearing to be a viable approach in the cancer therapeutic cache.

Mechanisms of disease: temozolomide and glioblastoma--look to the future

Glioblastoma is both the most common and most aggressive primary brain tumor. Until recently, the standard of care involved maximal safe surgical resection followed by radiation therapy with or without nitrosourea-based chemotherapy. In 2005, the results of a large clinical trial examining the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in management of newly diagnosed glioblastoma were published. This study created a new standard of adjuvant treatment, using concurrent and sequential temozolomide in the initial therapy of glioblastoma. A companion tumor biology study identified the prognostic role of O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) status in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Several preliminary studies have been initiated to address the issue of resistance and suppression of MGMT activity, and have used alternative temozolomide dosing schedules and O(6)-guanine mimetic agents as substrates for MGMT. In addition, recent studies have attempted to define mechanisms responsible for the apparent synergy between temozolomide and radiotherapy. Lastly, an increased understanding of the molecular biology of glioblastoma has provided new leads for the adjuvant treatment of this disease. This Review summarizes new developments in treatment of glioblastoma and speculates on possible future treatment strategies for managing this aggressive cancer.

A phase II trial of lomeguatrib and temozolomide in metastatic colorectal cancer

To evaluate the tumour response to lomeguatrib and temozolomide (TMZ) administered for 5 consecutive days every 4 weeks in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Patients with stage IV metastatic colorectal carcinoma received lomeguatrib (40 mg) and TMZ (50–200 mg m⁻²) orally for 5 consecutive days every 4 weeks. Response was determined every two cycles. Pharmacokinetics of lomeguatrib and TMZ as well as their pharmacodynamic effects in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were determined. Nineteen patients received 49 cycles of treatments. Despite consistent depletion of O⁶-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase in PBMC, none of the patients responded to treatment. Three patients had stable disease, one for the duration of the study, and no fall in carcinoembryonic antigen was observed in any patient. Median time to progression was 50 days. The commonest adverse effects were gastrointestinal and haematological and these were comparable to those of TMZ when given alone. This combination of lomeguatrib and TMZ is not efficacious in metastatic colorectal cancer. If further studies are to be performed, emerging data suggest that higher daily doses of lomeguatrib and a dosing period beyond that of TMZ should be evaluated.

Phase 1 trial of O6-benzylguanine and BCNU in children with CNS tumors: a Children's Oncology Group study

BACKGROUND

Efficacy of nitrosoureas is limited by host repair of drug-induced alkylation. O(6)-benzylguanine (O(6)-BG), an inhibitor of host alkylation repair, and BCNU were studied in children with refractory/untreatable central nervous system tumors to determine dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of BCNU administered following O(6)-BG.

PROCEDURE

O(6)-BG (120 mg/m(2) IV over 1 hr) was followed by BCNU (IV over 1 hr). Cohorts of three to six patients were treated with escalating doses of BCNU. Courses were repeated every 6 weeks. Patients in Stage 1 were accrued irrespective of prior treatment. Once the MTD was exceeded, Stage II accrual was limited to less heavily pretreated patients (</= two prior chemotherapy regimens, no prior central axis radiation, no prior bone marrow transplant, and no bone marrow involvement).

RESULTS

Twelve patients in Stage I and 13 in Stage II (less heavily pretreated patients only) were evaluable for toxicity. The MTD of BCNU administered with O(6)-BG (120 mg/m(2) IV) was 58 mg/m(2) in less-heavily pretreated patients. Myelosuppression, which was cumulative in some patients receiving multiple cycles of therapy, was the predominate DLT. Twenty-four patients were evaluable for response: after two courses of therapy, 6 had stable disease, 17 had progressive disease, and 1 patient had a minor response but progressed after four courses of therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on lack of activity of this combination in adult phase II studies, no further testing of O(6)-BG plus BCNU in children is planned. Strategies to decrease hematopoeitic toxicity of BCNU plus O(6)-BG are required.

MGMT promoter methylation correlates with survival benefit and sensitivity to temozolomide in pediatric glioblastoma

BACKGROUND

Methylation of the DNA-repair gene O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) causes gene silencing. This epigenetic modification has been associated with a favorable prognosis in adult patients with glioblastoma (GBM) who receive temozolomide and other alkylating agents. We explored MGMT promoter methylation in pediatric GBM and its relationship to survival and temozolomide sensitivity.

PROCEDURE

We performed a retrospective study of MGMT promoter methylation in 10 pediatric GBM. The methylation status of the MGMT was determined using a 2-stage methylation specific PCR analysis on DNA extracted from tumor specimens which had been snap frozen at surgery. The relationships between MGMT promoter methylation and patient outcome and response to temozolomide were evaluated.

RESULTS

Four of our 10 pediatric patients with GBM were found to have methylation of the MGMT gene promoter. Methylation of the MGMT promoter was shown to correlate (P = 0.0005) with survival. The average survival time for patients with methyltated MGMT was 13.7 months as compared to 2.5 months for the 6 patients with unmethylated MGMT promoter. Of the seven patients that received temozolomide, those patients that had the methylated MGMT gene promoter responded better to treatment (P = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

As in adults, pediatric GBM patients with methylated MGMT promoter benefited from temozolomide. However, a stronger correlation with overall survival, regardless of treatment, was observed in this group of patients. These data suggest that MGMT methylation may be a prognostic factor for survival in pediatric GBM, as well as a marker for temozolomide sensitivity.

O (4)-benzylfolic acid inactivates O (6)-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase in brain tumor cell lines

PURPOSE

The DNA repair protein, O (6)-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase (AGT), is a primary source of tumor resistance to agents such as temozolomide and chloroethylnitrosoureas that form DNA lesions at the O (6)-position of guanines. To increase the efficacy of these drugs, pseudosubstrate inactivators of AGT such as O (6)-benzylguanine have been developed. A novel inactivator of AGT, O (4)-benzylfolic acid (O(4)-BFA), has been reported which is more potent and water soluble than O (6)-benzylguanine. Previous studies have suggested that uptake of O(4)-BFA is mediated by the folate receptor (FR), and, thus, its use may be limited to cells expressing FR.

METHODS

We measured AGT activity in cell extracts from a panel of brain tumor cells exposed to O(4)-BFA. Inactivation of AGT by O(4)-BFA was measured in cells grown without folic acid as well as in cells grown in folic acid-containing media. Competitive binding studies were performed using purified FR to determine its affinity for O(4)-BFA.

RESULTS

The observed IC(50) for O(4)-BFA in brain tumor cell lines ranged from 0.2 to 1.3 microM for cells grown in media containing 2.3 microM folic acid. At this concentration, folic acid would saturate the FR and the FR would be unable to take up O(4)-BFA. When cells were grown in folic acid free media, there was at most a 50% decrease in the observed IC(50)s, indicating that the FR was not essential for O(4)-BFA uptake. Competitive binding studies using purified FR confirmed that the IC(50) for O(4)-BFA is approximately 180 times greater than folic acid, i.e., it has a very weak affinity for FR.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that O(4)-BFA has potentially broad use as an inactivator of AGT as its use is not limited to tumors expressing high levels of FR.

Phase I trial of polifeprosan 20 with carmustine implant plus continuous infusion of intravenous O6-benzylguanine in adults with recurrent malignant glioma: new approaches to brain tumor therapy CNS consortium trial

PURPOSE

This phase I trial was designed to (1) establish the dose of O6-benzylguanine (O6-BG) administered intravenously as a continuous infusion that suppresses O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase (AGT) levels in brain tumors, (2) evaluate the safety of extending continuous-infusion O6-BG at the optimal dose with intracranially implanted carmustine wafers, and (3) measure the pharmacokinetics of O6-BG and its metabolite.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The first patient cohort (group A) received 120 mg/m2 of O6-BG over 1 hour followed by a continuous infusion for 2 days at escalating doses presurgery. Tumor samples were evaluated for AGT levels. The continuous-infusion dose that resulted in undetectable AGT levels in 11 or more of 14 patients was used in the second patient cohort. Group B received the optimal dose of O6-BG for 2, 4, 7, or 14 days after surgical implantation of the carmustine wafers. The study end point was dose-limiting toxicity (DLT).

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients were accrued. In group A, 12 of 13 patients had AGT activity levels of less than 10 fmol/mg protein with a continuous-infusion O6-BG dose of 30 mg/m2/d. Group B patients were enrolled onto 2-, 4-, 7-, and 14-day continuous-infusion cohorts. One DLT of grade 3 elevation in ALT was seen. Other non-DLTs included ataxia and headache. For up to 14 days, steady-state levels of O6-BG were 0.1 to 0.4 micromol/L, and levels for O6-benzyl-8-oxoguanine were 0.7 to 1.3 micromol/L.

CONCLUSION

Systemically administered O6-BG can be coadministered with intracranially implanted carmustine wafers, without added toxicity. Future trials are required to determine if the inhibition of tumor AGT levels results in increased efficacy.

Recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: advances in treatment and promising drug candidates

Recurrent glioblastoma multiforme is a lethal disease with currently available treatment options having a limited impact on outcome. In this article, current and novel therapeutic approaches in the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme, including chemotherapy, targeted molecular agents, virotherapy/gene therapy and immunotherapy and challenges in developing novel therapeutic agents for glioblastoma multiforme will be discussed.

New approaches to primary brain tumor treatment

Primary brain tumors represent over 100 different tumor types with widely divergent biologies and clinical outcomes, but these neoplasms frequently pose similar challenges to neuro-oncologists. Malignant gliomas are the most common type of primary intrinsic brain tumor in adults and remain extremely lethal. Current standard-of-care therapies for these cancers include surgery, radiation and palliative cytotoxics, which have significant side-effects and limited efficacy. Advances in our understanding of the molecular underpinnings of cancer have led to targeted molecular therapies that may permit improvement in therapeutic efficacy and reduced toxicity; these therapies, however, still face many challenges. Signal transduction pathways that are inappropriately regulated in brain cancers include growth factors and their receptors (e.g. epidermal growth factor receptor, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and platelet-derived growth factor receptor), which regulate cellular interactions with the microenvironment and intracellular oncogenic pathways. Low-molecular-weight inhibitors have been developed to target many kinases and may have advantages in terms of delivery. Monoclonal antibodies may have greater specificity, but face delivery restrictions. Preferential tumor delivery of chemotherapies, conjugated toxins and radioisotopes has been achieved through convection-enhanced delivery, intratumoral implants and intra-arterial infusion. Despite these advances, few molecularly targeted therapies have demonstrated significant antineoplastic activity for a broad range of patients, possibly due to tumor and patient heterogeneity. Improved functional neuropathology and imaging may permit identification of patient subgroups for which clinical responses may be enriched. It is probable, however, that targeted therapies will be most effective in combination either with one another or with cytotoxic therapies. In this study, we review the current state of new therapies for malignant gliomas.

Should concomitant and adjuvant treatment with temozolomide be used as standard therapy in patients with anaplastic glioma?

Malignant gliomas are devastating tumors associated with poor prognosis. Standard treatment has been surgery followed by radiotherapy while the role of chemotherapy has remained controversial. Concomitant and adjuvant treatment with temozolomide has recently been shown to improve survival in patients with glioblastoma. While it seems intuitive to apply this regimen to patients with anaplastic gliomas which have traditionally been considered more chemosensitive, chemotherapy has not been shown to prolong life in patients with anaplastic gliomas. Despite promising preclinical and early clinical results, there is currently not enough level 1 evidence to justify concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide as standard therapy for patients with newly diagnosed anaplastic gliomas. Further investigation is needed to better define the role of chemotherapy in patients with anaplastic gliomas. Trials evaluating chemoradiotherapy as well as targeted therapeutic agents are the subject of further research.

Temozolomide 3 weeks on and 1 week off as first-line therapy for recurrent glioblastoma: phase II study from gruppo italiano cooperativo di neuro-oncologia (GICNO)

The efficacy of temozolomide strongly depends on O⁶-alkylguanine DNA-alkyl transferase (AGAT), which repairs DNA damage caused by the drug itself. Low-dose protracted temozolomide administration can decrease AGAT activity. The main end point of the present study was therefore to test progression-free survival at 6 months (PFS-6) in glioblastoma patients following a prolonged temozolomide schedule. Chemonaïve glioblastoma patients with disease recurrence or progression after surgery and standard radiotherapy were considered eligible. Chemotherapy cycles consisted of temozolomide 75 mg/m²/daily for 21 days every 28 days until disease progression. O⁶-methyl-guanine-DNA-methyl-tranferase (MGMT) was determined in 22 patients (66.7%). A total of 33 patients (median age 57 years, range 31–71) with a median KPS of 90 (range 60–100) were accrued. The overall response rate was 9%, and PFS-6 30.3% (95% CI:18–51%). No correlation was found between the MGMT promoter methylation status of the tumours and the overall response rate, time to progression and survival. In 153 treatment cycles delivered, the most common grade 3/4 event was lymphopoenia. The prolonged temozolomide schedule considered in the present study is followed by a high PFS-6 rate; toxicity is acceptable. Further randomised trials should therefore be conducted to confirm the efficacy of this regimen.

Local intracerebral administration of O(6)-benzylguanine combined with systemic chemotherapy with temozolomide of a patient suffering from a recurrent glioblastoma

The DNA repair protein O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) is a major determinant of methylating anticancer drug resistance. Inactivation of MGMT by pseudosubstrate inhibitors, such as O(6)-benzylguanine (O(6)BG), sensitizes tumor cells to O(6)-alkylating agents. However, systemic administration of O(6)BG causes depletion of MGMT in all tissues of the body. Therefore, dose reduction of O(6)-alkylating drugs administered together with O(6)BG is required in order to avoid unwished toxic side effects. To attenuate the increased systemic toxicity caused by MGMT inhibitors, local MGMT inactivation would be desirable. Here, we report on intracerebral treatment with O(6)BG of a patient suffering from glioblastoma. O(6)BG was administered weekly in the tumor cavity by means of an Ommaya reservoir. This application was well tolerated. Concomitant treatment with temozolomide (Temodal) was associated with transient tumor stabilization without detectable side effects. Although evidence is still lacking that local O(6)BG administration caused MGMT to be depleted in the residual tumor, the trial shows that intracerebral treatment with O(6)BG is feasible. It might be a safe strategy for improving glioma therapy by treatment with temozolomide (and presumably also other O(6)-alkylating drugs) concomitant with O(6)BG without augmenting drug-induced systemic side effects.

Cytotoxic and molecular chemotherapy for high-grade glioma: an emerging strategy for the future

Maximal surgical debulking and radiotherapy have been the cornerstone of therapy for high-grade gliomas. The impact of chemotherapy on outcome has been marginal and, until recently, its usage has been debatable. The development of new drugs and an improved understanding of chemoresistance have reinvigorated interest in this treatment modality. Furthermore, increasing knowledge of gliomagenesis has also led to novel non-cytotoxic approaches to targeting the molecular machinery that is responsible for tumour development and progression. These new strategies, which are currently being evaluated in clinical trials, provide new hope for the future.