Bad to the Bone: Emerging Approaches to Aggressive Bone Sarcomas

Bone sarcomas are rare heterogeneous tumors that affect patients of all ages including children, adolescent young adults, and older adults. They include many aggressive subtypes and patient groups with poor outcomes, poor access to clinical trials, and lack of defined standard therapeutic strategies. Conventional chondrosarcoma remains a surgical disease, with no defined role for cytotoxic therapy and no approved targeted systemic therapies. Here, we discuss promising novel targets and strategies undergoing evaluation in clinical trials. Multiagent chemotherapy has greatly improved outcomes for patients with Ewing sarcoma (ES) and osteosarcoma, but management of those with high-risk or recurrent disease remains challenging and controversial. We describe the impact of international collaborative trials, such as the rEECur study, that aim to define optimal treatment strategies for those with recurrent, refractory ES, and evidence for high-dose chemotherapy with stem-cell support. We also discuss current and emerging strategies for other small round cell sarcomas, such as CIC-rearranged, BCOR-rearranged tumors, and the evaluation of emerging novel therapeutics and trial designs that may offer a new paradigm to improve survival in these aggressive tumors with notoriously bad (to the bone) outcomes.

Pilot Study of Recurrent Ewing's Sarcoma Management with Vigil/Temozolomide/Irinotecan and Assessment of Circulating Tumor (ct) DNA

PURPOSE

Treatment options for recurrent or refractory Ewing's sarcoma (ES) are limited. Vigil is a novel autologous tumor cell therapy expressing bi-shRNA furin/GMCSF plasmid, which previously demonstrated monotherapy activity in advanced ES. Herein we report safety and evidence of benefit to Vigil for ES as potential treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this pilot trial, eligible patients with recurrent or refractory ES who failed initial standard-of-care therapy received treatment with temozolomide (TEM) 100 mg/m2/day oral and irinotecan (IRI) 50 mg/m2/day oral, Days 1 to 5, in combination with Vigil (1 × 106-107 cells/mL/day intradermal, Day 15), every 21 days (Vigil/TEM/IRI). Objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST v1.1, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed. Circulating tumor (ct) DNA analysis was done by patient-specific droplet digital PCR on baseline and serially collected on-treatment samples.

RESULTS

Eight of 10 enrolled patients were evaluable for safety and efficacy (mean age 24.6; 12.6-46.1 years old); 2 did not receive Vigil. Seven of 8 patients previously received TEM/IRI. No Vigil-related adverse events were reported. Common ≥Grade 3 chemotherapy-related toxicity included neutropenia (50%) and thrombocytopenia (38%). We observed two partial response patients by RECIST; both showed histologic complete response without additional cancer therapy. Median PFS was 8.2 months (95% confidence interval, 4.3-NA). Five patients showed stable disease or better for ≥6 months. Patient-specific EWS/FLI1 ctDNA was detectable in all 8 evaluable patients at baseline. Changes in ctDNA levels corresponded to changes in disease burden.

CONCLUSIONS

Results demonstrated safety of combination Vigil/TEM/IRI.

Ewing Sarcoma Drug Therapy: Current Standard of Care and Emerging Agents

Ewing sarcoma is a translocation-associated sarcoma mainly impacting adolescents and young adults. The classic translocation (EWSR1::FLI1) leads to a fusion oncoprotein that functions as an aberrant transcription factor. As such, the oncogenic driver of this disease has been difficult to target pharmacologically and, therefore, the systemic therapies used to treat patients with Ewing sarcoma have typically been non-selective cytotoxic chemotherapy agents. The current review highlights recent clinical trials from the last decade that provide the evidence base for contemporary drug therapy for patients with Ewing sarcoma, while also highlighting novel therapies under active clinical investigation in this disease. We review recent trials that have led to the establishment of interval-compressed chemotherapy as an international standard for patients with newly diagnosed localized disease. We further highlight recent trials that have shown a lack of demonstrable benefit from high-dose chemotherapy or IGF-1R inhibition for patients with newly diagnosed metastatic disease. Finally, we provide an overview of chemotherapy regimens and targeted therapies used in the management of patients with recurrent Ewing sarcoma.

Irinotecan dose schedule for the treatment of Ewing sarcoma

Irinotecan and temozolomide achieve objective responses in patients with Ewing sarcoma that recurs after initial therapy. Optimal dose schedules have not been defined. We reviewed published series of patients treated with irinotecan and temozolomide for Ewing sarcoma that recurred after initial therapy. We compared objective response rates for patients who received 5-day irinotecan treatment schedules to response rates for patients who achieved 10-day irinotecan treatment schedules. Among 89 patients treated with a 10-day irinotecan schedule, there were 47 objective responses (53%). Among 180 patients treated with a 5-day irinotecan schedule, there were 52 responses (29%). In the treatment of recurrent Ewing sarcoma, investigators should consider the use of a 10-day schedule for administration of irinotecan.

Sacral Ewing sarcoma with rib, lung, and multifocal skull metastases: A rare case report and review of treatments

Ewing sarcoma (ES) rarely derives from the sacrum or mobile spine. The discovery of primary ES with multimetastatic involvements is exceedingly less frequent in clinical practice. A 23-year-old man with initial primary sacral ES developed metastases of rib, lung, and multifocal skull after receiving surgical intervention and series of adjuvant therapies. We provide this very rare case consisting of its clinical features, imaging findings, treatments, and outcomes. Therapeutic modalities of ES are also reviewed in previous published articles. The prognosis of metastatic ES remains dismal; effective therapeutic modalities for ES require multidisciplinary collaboration, with more high-quality clinical trials to promote the optimal protocols.

Paediatric Strategy Forum for medicinal product development of multi-targeted kinase inhibitors in bone sarcomas: ACCELERATE in collaboration with the European Medicines Agency with participation of the Food and Drug Administration

The eighth Paediatric Strategy Forum focused on multi-targeted kinase inhibitors (mTKIs) in osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma. The development of curative, innovative products in these tumours is a high priority and addresses unmet needs in children, adolescents and adults. Despite clinical and investigational use of mTKIs, efficacy in patients with bone tumours has not been definitively demonstrated. Randomised studies, currently being planned or in progress, in front-line and relapse settings will inform the further development of this class of product. It is crucial that these are rapidly initiated to generate robust data to support international collaborative efforts. The experience to date has generally indicated that the safety profile of mTKIs as monotherapy, and in combination with chemotherapy or other targeted therapy, is consistent with that of adults and that toxicity is manageable. Increasing understanding of relevant predictive biomarkers and tumour biology is absolutely critical to further develop this class of products. Biospecimen samples for correlative studies and biomarker development should be shared, and a joint academic-industry consortium created. This would result in an integrated collection of serial tumour tissues and a systematic retrospective and prospective analyses of these samples to ensure robust assessment of biologic effect of mTKIs. To support access for children to benefit from these novel therapies, clinical trials should be designed with sufficient scientific rationale to support regulatory and payer requirements. To achieve this, early dialogue between academia, industry, regulators, and patient advocates is essential. Evaluating feasibility of combination strategies and then undertaking a randomised trial in the same protocol accelerates drug development. Where possible, clinical trials and development should include children, adolescents, and adults less than 40 years. To respond to emerging science, in approximately 12 months, a multi-stakeholder group will meet and review available data to determine future directions and priorities.

The Nitrogen Mustards

The nitrogen mustards are powerful cytotoxic and lymphoablative agents and have been used for more than 60 years. They are employed in the treatment of cancers, sarcomas, and hematologic malignancies. Cyclophosphamide, the most versatile of the nitrogen mustards, also has a place in stem cell transplantation and the therapy of autoimmune diseases. Adverse effects caused by the nitrogen mustards on the central nervous system, kidney, heart, bladder, and gonads remain important issues. Advances in analytical techniques have facilitated the investigation of the pharmacokinetics of the nitrogen mustards, especially the oxazaphosphorines, which are prodrugs requiring metabolic activation. Enzymes involved in the metabolism of cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide are very polymorphic, but a greater understanding of the pharmacogenomic influences on their activity has not yet translated into a personalized medicine approach. In addition to damaging DNA, the nitrogen mustards can act through other mechanisms, such as antiangiogenesis and immunomodulation. The immunomodulatory properties of cyclophosphamide are an area of current exploration. In particular, cyclophosphamide decreases the number and activity of regulatory T cells, and the interaction between cyclophosphamide and the intestinal microbiome is now recognized as an important factor. New derivatives of the nitrogen mustards continue to be assessed. Oxazaphosphorine analogs have been synthesized in attempts to both improve efficacy and reduce toxicity, with varying degrees of success. Combinations of the nitrogen mustards with monoclonal antibodies and small-molecule targeted agents are being evaluated. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The nitrogen mustards are important, well-established therapeutic agents that are used to treat a variety of diseases. Their role is continuing to evolve.

SELNET clinical practice guidelines for bone sarcoma

Bone sarcoma are infrequent diseases, representing < 0.2% of all adult neoplasms. A multidisciplinary management within reference centers for sarcoma, with discussion of the diagnostic and therapeutic strategies within an expert multidisciplinary tumour board, is essential for these patients, given its heterogeneity and low frequency. This approach leads to an improvement in patient's outcome, as demonstrated in several studies. The Sarcoma European Latin-American Network (SELNET), aims to improve clinical outcome in sarcoma care, with a special focus in Latin-American countries. These Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) have been developed and agreed by a multidisciplinary expert group (including medical and radiation oncologist, surgical oncologist, orthopaedic surgeons, radiologist, pathologist, molecular biologist and representatives of patients advocacy groups) of the SELNET consortium, and are conceived to provide the standard approach to diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of bone sarcoma patients in the Latin-American context.

Ewing sarcoma and related FET family translocation-associated round cell tumors: a century of clinical and scientific progress

The year 2021 marked the centenary of the first publication of a cancer termed diffuse endothelioma of bone by James Ewing. Its unique features were apparent even in the first case series he described. This new diagnosis was clearly distinct from osteogenic sarcoma and myeloma, which were already well recognized at the time. We undertake this summary to better understanding Ewing sarcoma, contrasting the logarithmic evolution of the standard of care of systemic therapy for this and related diagnoses to the exponential understanding of the molecular biology of this family of tumors. We also outline in this manuscript how the finding of genomic relatives within Ewing sarcoma itself and related tumors, first noted nearly 40 years ago, helps us appreciate the need to find therapeutic plans that are specific for each small round blue cell tumor subtype. The advent of next generation sequencing regarding previously unknown small round blue cell tumor subtypes in many ways puts us back in the shoes of James Ewing in 1921, searching anew for clues leading to better treatments for increasingly rare cancer subsets. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Irinotecan plus temozolomide in relapsed Ewing sarcoma: an integrated analysis of retrospective studies

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of patients with relapsed Ewing sarcoma is poor. In this study, we aimed to pooled-analyze the efficacy and safety of the combination of irinotecan and temozolomide in treating patients with relapsed Ewing sarcoma.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, and EMBASE were systematically searched on September 27, 2021. The primary outcomes were rates of objective response and disease control, and the secondary outcomes were toxicities.

RESULTS

Six retrospective studies with 184 patients were enrolled in the analysis. The median age ranged from 14 to 21. The integrated rates were 44% (95% confidence interval [CI] 31-58) for objective response and 66% (55-77) for disease control. Grade 3-4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and diarrhea occurred in 8% (3-16), 7% (3-11), and 8% (5-10) of chemotherapeutic cycles, respectively. 18% (7-32) and 6% (2-11) of patients suffered grade 3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia after irinotecan plus temozolomide treatment.

CONCLUSION

Irinotecan plus temozolomide combination chemotherapy showed antitumor activity and an acceptable safety profile in patients with relapsed Ewing sarcoma. More future prospective studies are needed to confirm the retrospective results.

Comorbidities rather than older age define outcome in adult patients with tumors of the Ewing sarcoma family

Background

Ewing family of tumors (EFT) is rarely diagnosed in patients (pts) over the age of 18 years (years), and data on the clinical course and the outcome of adult EFT pts is sparse.

Methods

In this retrospective analysis, we summarize our experience with adult EFT pts. From 2002 to 2020, we identified 71 pts of whom 58 were evaluable for the final analysis.

Results

Median age was 31 years (18–90 years). Pts presented with skeletal (n = 26), and extra‐skeletal primary disease (n =32). Tumor size was ≥8 cm in 20 pts and 19 pts were metastasized at first diagnosis. Between the age groups (≤25 vs. 26–40 vs. ≥41 years) we observed differences of Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), tumor origin, as well as type and number of therapy cycles. Overall, median overall survival (OS) was 79 months (95% confidence interval, CI; 28.5–131.4 months), and median progression‐free survival (PFS) 34 months (95% CI; 21.4–45.8 months). We observed a poorer outcome (OS, PFS) in older pts. This could be in part due to differences in treatment intensity and the CCI (<3 vs. ≥3; hazard ratio, HR 0.334, 95% CI 0.15–0.72, p = 0.006). In addition, tumor stage had a significant impact on PFS (localized vs. metastasized stage: HR 0.403, 95% CI 0.18–0.87, p = 0.021).

Conclusions

Our data confirms the feasibility of intensive treatment regimens in adult EFT pts. While in our cohort outcome was influenced by age, due to differences in treatment intensity, CCI, and tumor stage, larger studies are warranted to further explore optimized treatment protocols in adult EFT pts.

Systemic Treatment of Ewing Sarcoma: Current Options and Future Perspectives

Ewing sarcoma (ES) is an uncommon malignant neoplasm, mostly affecting young adults and adolescents. Surgical excision, irradiation, and combinations of multiple chemotherapeutic agents are currently used as a multimodal strategy for the treatment of local and oligometastatic disease. Although ES usually responds to the primary treatment, relapsed and primarily refractory disease remains a difficult therapeutic challenge. The growing understanding of cancer biology and the subsequent development of new therapeutic strategies have been put at the service of research in recurrent and refractory ES, generating a great number of ongoing studies with compounds that could find superior clinical outcomes in the years to come. This review gathers the current available information on the treatment and clinical investigation of ES and aims to be a point of support for future research.

Current approaches to management of bone sarcoma in adolescent and young adult patients

Bone tumors are a group of histologically diverse diseases that occur across all ages. Two of the commonest, osteosarcoma (OS) and Ewing sarcoma (ES), are regarded as characteristic adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancers with an incidence peak in AYAs. They are curable for some but associated with unacceptably high rates of treatment failure and morbidity. The introduction of effective new therapeutics for bone sarcomas is slow, and to date, complex biology has been insufficiently characterized to allow more rapid therapeutic exploitation. This review focuses on current standards of care, recent advances that have or may soon change that standard of care and challenges to the expert clinical research community that we suggest must be met.

Phase III Trial Adding Vincristine-Topotecan-Cyclophosphamide to the Initial Treatment of Patients With Nonmetastatic Ewing Sarcoma: A Children's Oncology Group Report

PURPOSE

The primary aim of this phase III randomized trial was to test whether the addition of vincristine, topotecan, and cyclophosphamide (VTC) to interval compressed chemotherapy improved survival outcomes for patients with previously untreated nonmetastatic Ewing sarcoma.

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to receive standard five-drug interval compressed chemotherapy (regimen A) for 17 cycles or experimental therapy with five cycles of VTC within the 17 cycles (regimen B). Patients were stratified by age at diagnosis (< 18 years and ≥18 years) and tumor site (pelvic bone, nonpelvic bone, and extraosseous). Tumor volume at diagnosis was categorized as < 200 mL or ≥ 200 mL. Local control occurred following six cycles. Histologic response was categorized as no viable or any viable tumor. Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between randomized groups with stratified log-rank tests.

RESULTS

Of 642 enrolled patients, 309 eligible patients received standard and 320 received experimental therapy. The 5-year EFS and OS were 78% and 87%, respectively. There was no difference in survival outcomes between randomized groups (5-year EFS regimen A v regimen B, 78% v 79%; P = .192; 5-year OS 86% v 88%; P = .159). Age and primary site did not affect the risk of an EFS event. However, age ≥ 18 years was associated with an increased risk of death at 5 years (hazard ratio 1.84; 95% CI, 1.15 to 2.96; P = .009). The 5-year EFS rates for patients with pelvic, nonpelvic bone, and extraosseous primary tumors were 75%, 78%, and 85%, respectively. Tumor volume ≥ 200 mL was significantly associated with lower EFS.

CONCLUSION

While VTC added to five-drug interval compressed chemotherapy did not improve survival, these outcomes represent the best survival estimates to date for patients with previously untreated nonmetastatic Ewing sarcoma.

An overview of current results with the vincristine-irinotecan-temozolomide combination with or without bevacizumab in pediatric, adolescence and adult solid tumors

Malignant tumors in young patients present a significant therapeutic challenge for physicians, partially due to their rarity and a relative lack of data, at least compared to adult tumors. As a result, there is an urgent need to explore new possible therapeutic regimens, either by introducing novel agents or by exploring combinations of existing agents. Vincristine, Temozolomide and Irinotecan are chemotherapeutic drugs which have emerged over the last six decades as monotherapy or as part of therapeutic regimens in various solid tumors. Combining these agents can yield strong synergistic effects, as suggested by preclinical data and results from clinical trials. Furthermore, adding novel molecules, such as anti-VEGF factor Bevacizumab to the aforementioned regimens, has shown efficacy in a limited number of trials, which are thoroughly analyzed throughout this review. Data presented throughout this paper suggest that VIT(b) regimen should be further explored in solid tumors in pediatric and adolescent patients.

Bone sarcoma: success through interdisciplinary collaboration

PURPOSE

Osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma are the most frequent malignant bone tumours of childhood and adolescence. This review summarizes the oncologist's view of these diseases and their treatment.

METHODS

A non-systematic literature review was performed, the personal impressions and experience of the authors is described.

RESULTS

Local therapy and chemotherapy, each on their own, will not cure patients with malignant bone sarcomas. Together, they present a highly efficacious combination. While the most effective drugs were defined decades ago, progress since then has been limited. It is hoped that substances shown to be active in relapsed disease will be forwarded into even more efficacious frontline treatments. Good palliative therapy is necessary when cure is no longer an option.

CONCLUSION

Close interdisciplinary collaboration is the key to successful treatment of bone sarcomas in paediatric patients.

Front-Line Window Therapy with Temozolomide and Irinotecan in Patients with Primary Disseminated Multifocal Ewing Sarcoma: Results of the ISG/AIEOP EW-2 Study

PURPOSE

The main objective was to evaluate the activity and tolerability of TEMIRI as a front-line treatment in primary disseminated Ewing sarcoma (PDMES) using the RECIST 1.1 criteria. The secondary objectives included the assessment of toxicity and the performance status/symptom changes.

METHODS

Between 2012 and 2018, patients with PDMES received two courses of temozolomide 100 mg/sqm/day + irinotecan 50 mg/sqm/day for 5 days every 3 weeks as an amendment to the Italian Sarcoma Group/Associazione Italiana EmatoIogia ed Oncologia Pediatrica (ISG/AIEOP) EW-2 protocol (EUDRACT#2009-012353-37, Vers. 1.02).

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients were enrolled. The median age at diagnosis was 19 years (range 3-55). After TEMIRI, the RECIST response was as follows: a partial response in 20 (59%) patients, stable disease in 11 (32%), and disease progression in 3 (9%). The ECOG/Lansky score was improved in 25/34 (73.5%) cases, and a reduction or disappearance of pain was observed in 31/34 patients (91%). The incidence of grade 3-4 toxicity was 3%. The 3-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 21% (95% CI 6-35%) and 36% (95% CI: 18-54%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

the smooth handling and encouraging activity demonstrated by up-front TEMIRI did not change the EFS in PDMES, so this result suggests the need for the further evaluation of the efficacy of TEMIRI in combination with conventional treatments in non-metastatic patients.

Ewing Sarcoma-Diagnosis, Treatment, Clinical Challenges and Future Perspectives

Ewing sarcoma, a highly aggressive bone and soft-tissue cancer, is considered a prime example of the paradigms of a translocation-positive sarcoma: a genetically rather simple disease with a specific and neomorphic-potential therapeutic target, whose oncogenic role was irrefutably defined decades ago. This is a disease that by definition has micrometastatic disease at diagnosis and a dismal prognosis for patients with macrometastatic or recurrent disease. International collaborations have defined the current standard of care in prospective studies, delivering multiple cycles of systemic therapy combined with local treatment; both are associated with significant morbidity that may result in strong psychological and physical burden for survivors. Nevertheless, the combination of non-directed chemotherapeutics and ever-evolving local modalities nowadays achieve a realistic chance of cure for the majority of patients with Ewing sarcoma. In this review, we focus on the current standard of diagnosis and treatment while attempting to answer some of the most pressing questions in clinical practice. In addition, this review provides scientific answers to clinical phenomena and occasionally defines the resulting translational studies needed to overcome the hurdle of treatment-associated morbidities and, most importantly, non-survival.

Irinotecan and temozolomide chemotherapy in paediatric and adult populations with relapsed Ewing Sarcoma

BACKGROUND

Irinotecan and temozolomide (IT) is a widely used regimen for relapsed Ewing sarcoma (ES), although studies are largely limited to paediatric populations.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed paediatric (< 18 years) and adult patients (≥ 18 years) treated with salvage IT at two institutions. Haematologic toxicities were graded according to common terminology criteria of adverse events. Survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the Log Rank test.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients were treated with IT from Jan, 2010 to Dec, 2018 (n = 16 paediatric; n = 37 adult). IT was given as second-line (n = 34; 64%) or ≥ third-line (n = 19; 36%). There was no difference in ≥ grade 3/4 haematologic toxicity between paediatrics and adults (31% vs. 35% respectively; p = 0.76). The frequency of diarrhoea of any grade was similar (38% in each group). Of 43 patients assessable for response, 12 (28%) had objective response (1 CR, 11 PR), 12 (28%) stable disease and 19 (44%) disease progression. Objective response rate did not differ between the two groups (36% in paediatrics vs. 25% in adults; p = 0.47). Median PFS was superior in paediatrics vs. adults (7.4 vs. 2.2 months, p = 0.039).

CONCLUSION

Irinotecan and temozolomide (IT) chemotherapy has activity for relapsed ES, with favourable toxicity and equally observed objective responses in the paediatric and adult populations. The observed superior PFS for the paediatric cohort requires further confirmation in future studies.

Current Status of Management and Outcome for Patients with Ewing Sarcoma

Ewing sarcoma is the second most common bone sarcoma in children after osteosarcoma. It is a very aggressive malignancy for which systemic treatment has greatly improved outcome for patients with localized disease, who now see survival rates of over 70%. However, for the quarter of patients presenting with metastatic disease, survival is still dismal with less than 30% of patients surviving past 5 years. Patients with disease relapse, local or distant, face an even poorer prognosis with an event-free 5-year survival rate of only 10%. Unfortunately, Ewing sarcoma patients have not yet seen the benefit of recent years' technical achievements such as next-generation sequencing, which have enabled researchers to study biological systems at a level never seen before. In spite of large multinational studies, treatment of Ewing sarcoma relies entirely on chemotherapeutic agents that have been largely unchanged for decades. As many promising modern therapies, including monoclonal antibodies, small molecules, and immunotherapy, have been disappointing to date, there is no clear candidate as to which drug should be investigated in the next large-scale clinical trial. However, the mechanisms driving tumor development in Ewing sarcoma are slowly unfolding. New entities of Ewing-like tumors, with fusion transcripts that are related to the oncogenic EWSR1-FLI1 fusion seen in the majority of Ewing tumors, are being mapped. These tumors, although sharing much of the same morphologic features as classic Ewing sarcoma, behave differently and may require a different treatment. There are also controversies regarding local treatment of Ewing sarcoma. The radiosensitive nature of the disease and the tendency for Ewing sarcoma to arise in the axial skeleton make local treatment very challenging. Surgical treatment and radiotherapy have their pros and cons, which may give rise to different treatment strategies in different centers around the world. This review article discusses some of these controversies and reproduces the highlights from recent publications with regard to diagnostics, systemic treatment, and surgical treatment of Ewing sarcoma.

Anlotinib, Vincristine, and Irinotecan for Advanced Ewing Sarcoma After Failure of Standard Multimodal Therapy: A Two-Cohort, Phase Ib/II Trial

BACKGROUND

Both protracted irinotecan and antiangiogenesis therapy have shown promising efficacy against Ewing sarcoma (EWS).

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with recurrent or refractory EWS were enrolled and further categorized into cohort A (≥16 years) or cohort B (<16 years). In the dose-defining phase Ib portion, anlotinib was given daily at a fixed dose, while a 3+3 design with dose de-escalation was used to determine the dose of irinotecan. The next dose-expanding phase II portion employed a conventional two-stage study design model. The primary endpoint was objective response rate at 12 weeks (ORR_12w ).

RESULTS

A total of 41 patients finally received the treatment regimen, including 29 in cohort A and 12 in cohort B. For cohort A, the first five patients were treated at the initial level of 20 mg/m² /d d × 5 × 2, and two of them subsequently a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). An additional six patients were then treated at 15 mg/m² without any DLT, and the RP2D was determined. Notably, 23 out of 24 patients in cohort A were available for response evaluation at 12 weeks. ORR_12w was determined to be 62.5%. For cohort B, no DLT was observed in the first six patients at the initial dose level. At last, 12 patients were included in cohort B. The ORR_12w was 83.3%. The most frequently observed grade 3/4 adverse events were leukopenia (28.5%), neutropenia (24.4%), anemia (8.7%), and diarrhea (3.7%).

CONCLUSION

The combination of vincristine, irinotecan, and anlotinib demonstrated an acceptable toxicity profile and promising clinical efficacy in patients with advanced EWS.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

This is the first trial to evaluate an irinotecan-based regimen in combination with antiangiogenesis tyrosine kinase inhibitors in Ewing sarcoma (EWS). A 3+3 design with dose de-escalation was used to determine the most appropriate dose of irinotecan in each cohort. The next dose-expanding phase II portion employed a conventional two-stage study design model. The objective response rate was 62.5% for adults and 83.3% for children. Median overall survival was not matured. This study shows that the combination of vincristine, irinotecan, and anlotinib demonstrates an acceptable toxicity profile and promising clinical efficacy in patients with advanced EWS.

Notable response of a young adult with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme to vincristine-irinotecan-temozolomide and bevacizumab

Glioblastoma multiforme is a malignant central nervous system (CNS) disease with dismal prognosis. Current treatment modalities only offer modest activity and usually of short duration, so there is an urgent need for the conduct of clinical trials exploring new treatment options and modalities. The vincristine-irinotecan-temozolomide and bevacizumab (VITb) regimen is an option of special interest, as it has produced encouraging results in young patients with various relapsed/refractory childhood and adolescence solid tumors, with an acceptable toxicity profile. With the current report, we present the case of a young male patient who was treated for GBM in second relapse at out institution, after previous surgical attempts and two radiotherapy sessions in conjunction with temozolomide and experienced a major and long-lasting response, weaned off steroids, to the VITb regimen followed by bevacizumab maintenance. The above case is discussed in the context of the existing literature regarding available evidence of synergy between the drugs used and the activity of certain components of the combination (i.e. combination of temozolomide-irinotecan ± vincristine, or bevacizumab-irinotecan in GBM) or the complete VITb regimen in other pediatric/adolescence solid tumors and the few cases reported with GBM.

Exploiting Gangliosides for the Therapy of Ewing's Sarcoma and H3K27M-Mutant Diffuse Midline Glioma

Simple Summary

Osteosarcoma, Ewing’s sarcoma, and H3K27M-mutant diffuse midline glioma are rare but aggressive malignancies occurring mainly in children. Due to their rareness and often fatal course, drug development is challenging. Here, we repurposed the existing drugs dinutuximab and eliglustat and investigated their potential to directly target or indirectly modulate the tumor cell-specific ganglioside GD2. Our data suggest that targeting and/or modulating tumor cell-specific GD2 may offer a new therapeutic strategy for the above mentioned tumor entities.

Abstract

The ganglioside GD2 is an important target in childhood cancer. Nevertheless, the only therapy targeting GD2 that is approved to date is the monoclonal antibody dinutuximab, which is used in the therapy of neuroblastoma. The relevance of GD2 as a target in other tumor entities remains to be elucidated. Here, we analyzed the expression of GD2 in different pediatric tumor entities by flow cytometry and tested two approaches for targeting GD2. H3K27M-mutant diffuse midline glioma (H3K27M-mutant DMG) samples showed the highest expression of GD2 with all cells strongly positive for the antigen. Ewing’s sarcoma (ES) samples also showed high expression, but displayed intra- and intertumor heterogeneity. Osteosarcoma had low to intermediate expression with a high percentage of GD2-negative cells. Dinutuximab beta in combination with irinotecan and temozolomide was used to treat a five-year-old girl with refractory ES. Disease control lasted over 12 months until a single partially GD2-negative intracranial metastasis was detected. In order to target GD2 in H3K27M-mutant DMG, we blocked ganglioside synthesis via eliglustat, since dinutuximab cannot cross the blood–brain barrier. Eliglustat is an inhibitor of glucosylceramide synthase, and it is used for treating children with Gaucher’s disease. Eliglustat completely inhibited the proliferation of primary H3K27M-mutant DMG cells in vitro. In summary, our data provide evidence that dinutuximab might be effective in tumors with high GD2 expression. Moreover, disrupting the ganglioside metabolism in H3K27M-mutant DMG could open up a new therapeutic option for this highly fatal cancer.

SARC025 arms 1 and 2: A phase 1 study of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor niraparib with temozolomide or irinotecan in patients with advanced Ewing sarcoma

Background

In preclinical Ewing sarcoma (ES) models, poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors were identified as a potential therapeutic strategy with synergy in combination with cytotoxic agents. This study evaluated the safety and dosing of the PARP1/2 inhibitor niraparib (NIR) with temozolomide (TMZ; arm 1) or irinotecan (IRN; arm 2) in patients with pretreated ES.

Methods

Eligible patients in arm 1 received continuous NIR daily and escalating TMZ (days 2‐6 [D2‐6]) in cohort A. Subsequent patients received intermittent NIR dosing (cohort B), with TMZ re‐escalation in cohort C. In arm 2, patients were assigned to NIR (days 1‐7 [D1‐7]) and escalating doses of IRN (D2‐6).

Results

From July 2014 to May 2018, 29 eligible patients (23 males and 6 females) were enrolled in arms 1 and 2, which had 7 dose levels combined. Five patients experienced at least 1 dose‐limiting toxicity (DLT) in arm 1 (grade 4 [G4] neutropenia for >7 days or G4 thrombocytopenia), and 3 patients experienced at least 1 DLT in arm 2 (grade 3 [G3] colitis, G3 anorexia, or G3 alanine aminotransferase elevation). The maximum tolerated dose was NIR at 200 mg every day on D1‐7 plus TMZ at 30 mg/m² every day on D2‐6 (arm 1) or NIR at 100 mg every day on D1‐7 plus IRN at 20 mg/m² every day on D2‐6 (arm 2). One confirmed partial response was observed in arm 2; the median progression‐free survival was 9.0 weeks (95% CI, 7.0‐10.1 weeks) and 16.3 weeks (95% CI, 5.1‐69.7 weeks) in arms 1 and 2, respectively. The median decrease in tumor poly(ADP‐ribose) activity was 89% (range, 83%‐98%).

Conclusions

The combination of NIR and TMZ or IRN was tolerable, but at lower doses in comparison with conventional cytotoxic combinations. A triple‐combination study of NIR, IRN, and TMZ has commenced.

Preclinical evaluations have identified the EWS‐FLI1 translocation, pathognomonic of Ewing sarcoma, as a predictive factor of response to poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors with synergistic cell death in vivo with DNA damaging agents. This phase 1 study examines the dosing and safety of a combination of the PARP inhibitor niraparib with temozolomide or irinotecan.

Continuous 14 Day Infusional Ifosfamide for Management of Soft-Tissue and Bone Sarcoma: A Single Centre Retrospective Cohort Analysis

Simple Summary

Ifosfamide is commonly used to treat patients with soft-tissue and bone sarcoma, with greater efficacy observed with higher doses that generally require inpatient treatment and may result in significant myelosuppression and renal toxicity. In the palliative setting, continuous infusional ifosfamide (14 g/m²/14 days) is increasingly employed in an attempt to mitigate toxicity, and for ease of administration as an outpatient regimen. This study describes the efficacy and toxicity profile of 14-day continuous infusional ifosfamide in adult and teenage young adult (TYA) patients with relapsed or metastatic soft-tissue and bone sarcoma.

Abstract

Ifosfamide is used to treat soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) and bone sarcoma (BS), with improved efficacy at doses above 9 g/m²/cycle. To mitigate treatment-associated toxicity with higher doses, continuous infusional ifosfamide is increasingly used. However, clinical outcome data remain limited. Single-centre retrospective analysis of patients treated with four-weekly infusional ifosfamide (14 g/m²/14d) between August 2012 and February 2019 was conducted. Radiological response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity were evaluated. Eighty patients were treated—46 with STS and 34 with BS. Patients received a median of three cycles of infusional ifosfamide (1–24). Overall disease control rate (DCR) in STS was 50% (23 of 46 patients), with a median PFS of 3.8 months, and median OS of 13.0 months. In synovial sarcoma (SS), DCR was 80% (12/15), median PFS 8.1 months and median OS 20.9 months. Overall DCR in BS (34 patients) was 30%, with a median PFS of 2.5 months and median OS of 6.2 months. Five patients (6%) stopped treatment due to toxicity alone within the first two cycles. A further 10 patients stopped treatment due to toxicity during later treatment cycles (12%) and 18 patients (23%) required dose modification. Forty-five patients (56%) experienced grade (G) 3/4 haematological toxicity, with 12 episodes of febrile neutropenia and one treatment-related death. Twenty-seven patients (34%) experienced G3/4 non-haematological toxicity, most commonly nausea and vomiting (10, 13%). In summary, infusional ifosfamide has efficacy in STS, most notable in SS. Benefit appears limited in BS. Treatment is associated with toxicity that requires specialist supportive care.