1
|
Skiba MB, Miller D, Stratton DB, Hall CA, McKenna S, Blair CK, Demark-Wahnefried W. Adaptation and study protocol for harvest for health together Arizona: A mentored community garden intervention for survivors of cancer. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2024; 39:101290. [PMID: 38595771 PMCID: PMC11002544 DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Revised: 02/16/2024] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Current health behavior recommendations for skin cancer prevention, treatment, and survivorship are the same for survivors of other cancers; they include eating a healthy diet, being physically active, maintaining a healthy weight, and minimizing ultraviolet (U.V.) exposure. Few interventions exist to support health behaviors beyond U.V. exposure. We adapted Harvest for Health, a home-based mentored gardening intervention for cancer survivors, for implementation in Arizona as a community-based intervention. Methods Stakeholder-informed adaptations for Harvest for Health Together Arizona (H4H2-AZ) included updating intervention materials to be relevant to the arid desert environment, emphasizing the importance of sun safety in cancer survivorship, and shifting from a home-based to a community-based delivery model. Participants will be enrolled in cohorts aligned with growing seasons (e.g., spring, monsoon, fall) and matched to an individual 30 ft2 community garden plot for two growing seasons (6 months). Original intervention components retained are: 1) Master Gardeners deliver the intervention providing one-to-one mentorship and 2) gardening materials and supplies provided. This pilot six-month single-arm intervention will determine feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of an evidence-based adapted mentored community gardening intervention for survivors of skin cancer as primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes are to explore the effects on cancer preventive health behaviors and health-related quality of life. Discussion This pilot single-arm intervention will determine feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of an evidence-based adapted mentored community gardening intervention for survivors of skin cancer. If successful, the intervention could be widely implemented throughout existing Master Gardener programs and community garden networks for survivors of other cancers. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05648604. Trial registered on December 13, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan B. Skiba
- Advanced Nursing Practice and Science Division, College of Nursing, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
- University of Arizona Cancer Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Dylan Miller
- University of Arizona Cancer Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Delaney B. Stratton
- University of Arizona Cancer Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
- Dermatology, Banner University Health, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Caitlyn A. Hall
- W.A. Franke Honors College, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
- Department of Biosystems Engineering, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Sharon McKenna
- Melanoma Task Force, Arizona Department of Health Services, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Cindy K. Blair
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Wendy Demark-Wahnefried
- Department of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
- O’Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Goyal A, Fei-Zhang DJ, Pawlik TM, Bentrem DJ, Wayne JD. Associations of social vulnerability with truncal and extremity melanomas in the United States. J Surg Oncol 2024; 129:544-555. [PMID: 38009468 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2023] [Revised: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prior studies in social determinants (SDoH) of truncal-extremity melanomas (TEM) have analyzed race, income, and environmental factors relative to their effect on health disparities. However, they are limited by the narrow scopes of SDoH and study population, while lacking analyses of interrelational contribution of SDoH on TEM disparities. METHODS This retrospective cohort study of adult TEM patients (1975-2017) assessed linear regression trends in months of survival, as well as logistic regression trends in advanced presenting stage, surgery, and chemotherapy receipt across TEM subtypes with increasing overall social vulnerability and vulnerability in 15 SDoH variables grouped into socioeconomic status (SES), minority-language status (ML), household composition (HH), and housing-transportation (HT) themes measured by the SVI. SVI measures are ranked/compared across all US counties for relative vulnerability in a specific SDH and their total composite while accounting for sociodemographic-regional differences. RESULTS Across 325 760 TEM patients, increasing overall social vulnerability demonstrated significant decreases in the survival period for 7/13 TEM histology types (p < 0.001), with relative decreases in the survival period as high as 44.0% (67.0-37.5 months) for epithelioid cell. SES and HH were the highest-magnitude contributors to these overall trends. For many patients with TEM, increased odds of advanced presenting stage (highest with acral-lentiginous: odds ratio [OR], -1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.36), decreased odds of indicated surgery receipt (lowest with amelanotic, 0.79; 0.71-0.87), and increased odds of indicated chemotherapy (highest with melanoma in giant nevi: 1.50; 1.01-2.44) were observed; SES and ML followed by HH and HT contributed to these trends. CONCLUSIONS There were detriments in TEM care & prognosis in the United States with increasing social vulnerability. Identifying which SDH quantifiably are associated more with disparities in interrelational, real-world contexts is important to provide nuance to inform future research and initiatives to address TEM disparity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ansh Goyal
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - David J Fei-Zhang
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - David J Bentrem
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Jeffrey D Wayne
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gorin SS, Hirko K. Primary Prevention of Cancer: A Multilevel Approach to Behavioral Risk Factor Reduction in Racially and Ethnically Minoritized Groups. Cancer J 2023; 29:354-361. [PMID: 37963370 DOI: 10.1097/ppo.0000000000000686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Cancer continues to be the second most common cause of death in the United States. Racially and ethnically minoritized populations continue to experience disparities in cancer prevention compared with majority populations. Multilevel interventions-from policy, communities, health care institutions, clinical teams, families, and individuals-may be uniquely suited to reducing health disparities through behavioral risk factor modification in these populations. The aim of this article is to provide a brief overview of the evidence for primary prevention among racially and ethnically minoritized subpopulations in the United States. We focus on the epidemiology of tobacco use, obesity, diet and physical activity, alcohol use, sun exposure, and smoking, as well as increasing uptake of the Human Papillomavirus Vaccine (HPV), as mutable behavioral risk factors. We describe interventions at the policy level, including raising excise taxes on tobacco products; within communities and with community partners, for safe greenways and parks, and local healthful food; health care institutions, with reminder systems for HPV vaccinations; among clinicians, by screening for alcohol use and providing tailored weight reduction approaches; families, with HPV education; and among individuals, routinely using sun protection. A multilevel approach to primary prevention of cancer can modify many of the risk factors in racially and ethnically minoritized populations for whom cancer is already a burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sherri Sheinfeld Gorin
- From the Department of Family Medicine, The School of Medicine, and the School of Public Health, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Kelly Hirko
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dhumal T, Scott VG, Powers R, Kelly KM. Assessing the impact of the skin cancer awareness now (SCAN!) intervention several months following the intervention. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2023; 63:1803-1807. [PMID: 37717920 DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2023.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Revised: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND West Virginia (WV) is the third most rural state in the US and has a high incidence of skin cancer. Intervention efforts in WV are impeded by structural barriers, low health literacy, and lack of health care access. Community pharmacies and pharmacists are highly accessible and may be helpful in promoting skin cancer prevention. OBJECTIVE(S) The purpose of the study was to evaluate the impact of the Skin Cancer Awareness Now (SCAN!) pharmacy-based sun-safety intervention at follow-up. METHODS Surveys assessed SCAN's effect on skin cancer prevention at preintervention and follow-up. The follow-up survey was administered between 8 and 12 months after our initial feasibility study. Questions included demographics, cancer history, cancer worry, knowledge, cancer communication, and skin cancer screening intentions. Multivariate repeated measures ANOVA assessed the change in worry, importance, knowledge, and intentions to be sun safe. RESULTS Participants (n=56, response rate= 62.2%) had a mean age of 44.7 (standard deviation: 19.3) years. Most were females (87.5%), Whites (92.9%), and 48.2% lived in rural areas. Knowledge and intentions significantly improved over time. At follow-up, participants (41.1%) mentioned that they plan on discussing skin cancer prevention with their pharmacist in the future. CONCLUSION The SCAN! intervention can be a useful resource for skin cancer prevention in community pharmacy settings. Community pharmacies have the potential to be change agents in skin cancer prevention by providing education on sun protection or detection and by promoting sun-safety behaviors.
Collapse
|
5
|
Gefeller O, Mathes S, Uter W, Pfahlberg AB. The Role of the Global Solar UV Index for Sun Protection of Children in German Kindergartens. Children (Basel) 2022; 9:children9020198. [PMID: 35204917 PMCID: PMC8870228 DOI: 10.3390/children9020198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2021] [Revised: 01/28/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
More than twenty-five years ago, the Global Solar UV index (UVI) was introduced as a simple means of visualizing the intensity of ultraviolet radiation and to alert people to the need for sun protection. In our survey, among directors of 436 kindergartens in southern Germany we investigated the level of awareness and knowledge about the UVI as well as the practical consequences for sun protection in kindergartens. Less than half of the directors (n = 208, 47.7%) had ever heard of the UVI, and only a small minority of them (n = 34, 8.7%) used the daily UVI information to adapt sun protective measures in their kindergartens. Detailed knowledge about the UVI was a rarity among the respondents. The proportion of respondents with self-perceived detailed UVI knowledge was five times higher than the actual knowledge assessed by an in-depth structured interview using open-ended questions about the UVI (14.2% vs. 2.8%). No clear relationship between UVI awareness, knowledge, and use and directors' age and gender was found. The UVI-related variables also showed no association with directors' knowledge of risk factors for skin cancer and their attitudes towards tanned skin. Overall, the results paint a sobering picture regarding the penetration of the UVI into sun protection policies of German kindergartens. Future public health campaigns should aim to increase the awareness and understanding of the UVI as well as its relevance for sun protection of children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olaf Gefeller
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (W.U.); (A.B.P.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-9131-85-22750
| | - Sonja Mathes
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Technical University of Munich, 80802 Munich, Germany;
| | - Wolfgang Uter
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (W.U.); (A.B.P.)
| | - Annette B. Pfahlberg
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (W.U.); (A.B.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Perez M, Abisaad JA, Rojas KD, Marchetti MA, Jaimes N. Skin Cancer: Primary, Secondary, and Tertiary Prevention. Part I. J Am Acad Dermatol 2022; 87:255-268. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.12.066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Revised: 12/03/2021] [Accepted: 12/15/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
7
|
Strauss DG, Michele TM. Skin Cancer Prevention and Sunscreen Safety: Commentary on American Society of Clinical Oncology Policy Statement on Skin Cancer Prevention. JCO Oncol Pract 2020; 16:436-438. [PMID: 32603257 DOI: 10.1200/op.20.00425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- David G Strauss
- Division of Applied Regulatory Science, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
| | - Theresa M Michele
- Office of Nonprescription Drugs, Office of New Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
| |
Collapse
|