1
|
Garg M, Gandhi K, Jadhav SM, Gurjar M, Gota V. Effect of Moderate Malnutrition on the Pharmacokinetics of Etoposide and Vincristine in Freshly Weaned Rats. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 2023; 48:657-663. [PMID: 37700116 DOI: 10.1007/s13318-023-00851-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Moderate malnutrition is a common problem in young children. It is observed that severe malnutrition affects the pharmacokinetics of chemotherapy drugs in pediatric cancer patients, but moderate malnutrition is not well studied in this context. OBJECTIVES In this study, we aimed to understand how moderate malnutrition affects the pharmacokinetics of two chemotherapy drugs, etoposide and vincristine, using a murine model of early age moderate malnutrition. METHODS We developed a murine model of moderate childhood malnutrition by subjecting freshly weaned Sprague-Dawley rats to 8% protein diet for 8 weeks. In two separate experiments, we administered etoposide and vincristine (N = 8 for etoposide and N = 12 for vincristine each in protein deficient and control groups) through tail vein injection for pharmacokinetics study. RESULTS We found ~ 60% increase in area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of etoposide in malnourished animals as compared to well-nourished animals. Furthermore, clearance, volume of distribution, and half-life were decreased by ~ 37, 53, and 24%, respectively, in malnourished animals. Pharmacokinetic parameters of vincristine showed only marginal differences between well-nourished and malnourished groups. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that while moderate malnutrition significantly affects the pharmacokinetics of etoposide, pharmacokinetics of vincristine remain unchanged. Since chemotherapy drugs have a narrow therapeutic index, the difference in AUC observed in our study might explain the increased toxicity of etoposide in malnourished pediatric cancer patients. This brings forth a need for robust clinical studies to validate our findings and optimize dose for malnourished patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megha Garg
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre (TMC), Sector-22, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, 410210, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Training School Complex, Anushakti Nagar, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400094, India
| | - Khushboo Gandhi
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre (TMC), Sector-22, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, 410210, India
| | - Shraddha Mahesh Jadhav
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre (TMC), Sector-22, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, 410210, India
| | - Murari Gurjar
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre (TMC), Sector-22, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, 410210, India
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Mahamana Pandit Madan Mohan Malviya Cancer Centre, Banaras Hindu University Campus, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, 221005, India
| | - Vikram Gota
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre (TMC), Sector-22, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, 410210, India.
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Training School Complex, Anushakti Nagar, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400094, India.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Reece L, Moran B, Ferrie S, Ansari N, Koh C, Allman-Farinelli M, Carey S. A global analysis of nutrition support practices in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal malignancy. Clin Nutr ESPEN 2023; 57:297-304. [PMID: 37739672 DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2023.07.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perioperative nutritional care has been identified as an important factor in the management of patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Nevertheless, there is no published consensus on best practice for nutritional management specific to this patient group. The purpose of this study was to identify the current nutrition care practices among international centres performing CRS and HIPEC for patients with peritoneal malignancy. METHODS An online survey was developed and sent to experienced CRS and HIPEC centres. The survey questions covered clinician and institution demographics, formal nutrition care pathways, pre-operative nutrition care, post-operative nutrition support and post-discharge nutritional follow-up. RESULTS Eighty-two centres were contacted, and 42 responses were received. Respondents were from 20 different countries and were mostly dietitians (71%). Nutrition assessments were frequently completed (52% pre-operatively and 86% post-operatively) and most centres used a validated nutrition screening or assessment tool (79%). Perioperative nutrition support with respect to the use of enteral nutrition, parenteral nutrition and enhanced recovery after surgery varied widely between centres. The use of routine parenteral and enteral nutrition was significantly higher in Europe compared with other locations (p = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS Nutrition care is pivotal and has been positively integrated into the complex management of patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC globally, however variation in practice is evident. The findings highlight a unique opportunity to collaboratively investigate the role nutrition plays in determining outcomes and to identify the most appropriate nutrition support methods to achieve improved clinical outcomes for these high-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Reece
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
| | - Brendan Moran
- Peritoneal Malignancy Institute, Hampshire Hospital Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, United Kingdom
| | - Suzie Ferrie
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Nabila Ansari
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; RPA Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and the University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Cherry Koh
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; RPA Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and the University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Margaret Allman-Farinelli
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Sharon Carey
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; RPA Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and the University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lorenzon L, Caccialanza R, Casalone V, Santoro G, Delrio P, Izzo F, Tonello M, Mele MC, Pozzo C, Pedrazzoli P, Pietrabissa A, Fenu P, Mellano A, Fenocchio E, Avallone A, Bergamo F, Nardi MT, Persiani R, Biondi A, Tirelli F, Agnes A, Ferraris R, Quarà V, Milanesio M, Ribero D, Rinaldi M, D'Elia P, Rho M, Cenzi C, D'Ugo D. The impact of preoperative nutritional screening, ERAS protocol, and mini-invasive surgery in surgical oncology: A multi-institutional SEM analysis of patients with digestive cancer. Front Nutr 2023; 10:1041153. [PMID: 37006925 PMCID: PMC10063158 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1041153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2022] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BackgroundMini-invasive surgery (MIS), ERAS, and preoperative nutritional screening are currently used to reduce complications and the length of hospital stay (LOS); however, inter-variable correlations have seldom been explored. This research aimed to define inter-variable correlations in a large series of patients with gastrointestinal cancer and their impact on outcomes.MethodsPatients with consecutive cancer who underwent radical gastrointestinal surgery between 2019 and 2020 were analyzed. Age, BMI, comorbidities, ERAS, nutritional screening, and MIS were evaluated to determine their impact on 30-day complications and LOS. Inter-variable correlations were measured, and a latent variable was computed to define the patients' performance status using nutritional screening and comorbidity. Analyses were conducted using structural equation modeling (SEM).ResultsOf the 1,968 eligible patients, 1,648 were analyzed. Univariable analyses documented the benefit of nutritional screening for LOS and MIS and ERAS (≥7 items) for LOS and complications; conversely, being male and comorbidities correlated with complications, while increased age and BMI correlated with worse outcomes. SEM analysis revealed that (a) the latent variable is explained by the use of nutritional screening (p0·004); (b) the variables were correlated (age–comorbidity, ERAS–MIS, and ERAS–nutritional screening, p < 0·001); and (c) their impact on the outcomes was based on direct effects (complications: sex, p0·001), indirect effects (LOS: MIS-ERAS-nutritional screening, p < 0·001; complications: MIS-ERAS, p0·001), and regression-based effects (LOS: ERAS, MIS, p < 0·001, nutritional screening, p0·021; complications: ERAS, MIS, p < 0·001, sex, p0·001). Finally, LOS and complications were correlated (p < 0·001).ConclusionEnhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), MIS, and nutritional screening are beneficial in surgical oncology; however, the inter-variable correlation is reliable, underlying the importance of the multidisciplinary approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Lorenzon
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
- *Correspondence: Laura Lorenzon
| | | | | | - Gloria Santoro
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Delrio
- Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori Fondazione Giovanni Pascale IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Izzo
- Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori Fondazione Giovanni Pascale IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | - Marco Tonello
- Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Maria Cristina Mele
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Carmelo Pozzo
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Piero Fenu
- Candiolo Cancer Institute–IRCCS, Turin, Italy
| | | | | | - Antonio Avallone
- Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori Fondazione Giovanni Pascale IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | | | | | - Roberto Persiani
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Alberto Biondi
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Flavio Tirelli
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Annamaria Agnes
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Maurizio Rho
- Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori Fondazione Giovanni Pascale IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | - Carola Cenzi
- Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Domenico D'Ugo
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gearing PF, Hawke JA, Mohan H, Heriot AG, Khan A, Beaumont A, Laing E, Waters PS. Perioperative nutritional assessment and interventions in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC): A systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol 2023; 49:902-917. [PMID: 36872111 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.02.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2022] [Revised: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peritoneal carcinomatosis is a catabolic state and cytoreductive surgery (CRS) is a high morbidity operation. Optimising perioperative nutrition is crucial to improve outcomes. This systematic review sought to examine literature describing clinical outcomes related to preoperative nutrition status and nutrition interventions in patients undergoing CRS with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). METHODS A systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (300326). A search of eight electronic databases was undertaken on 8th May 2022 and reported according to the PRISMA statement. Studies reporting nutrition status through use of screening and assessment tools, nutrition interventions or nutrition-related clinical outcomes for patients undergoing CRS with HIPEC were included. RESULTS Of 276 screened studies, 25 studies were included for review. Commonly used nutrition assessment tools for CRS-HIPEC patients included Subjective Global Assessment (SGA), sarcopenia assessment with computed tomography, preoperative albumin, and body mass index (BMI). Three retrospective studies compared SGA with postoperative outcomes. Malnourished patients were more likely to have postoperative infectious complications (p = 0.042 SGA-B, p = 0.025 SGA-C). Malnutrition was significantly associated with increased hospital length of stay (LOS) in two studies (p = 0.006, p = 0.02), and with overall survival in another study (p = 0.006). Eight studies analysing preoperative albumin levels reported conflicting associations with postoperative outcomes. BMI in five studies was not associated with morbidity. One study did not support routine nasogastric tube (NGT) feeding. CONCLUSIONS Preoperative nutritional assessment tools, including SGA and objective sarcopaenia measures, have a role in predicting nutritional status for CRS-HIPEC patients. Optimisation of nutrition is important for preventing complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter F Gearing
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Justin A Hawke
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Helen Mohan
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Alexander G Heriot
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ayman Khan
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Anna Beaumont
- Nutrition and Speech Pathology Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Erin Laing
- Nutrition and Speech Pathology Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Peadar S Waters
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Surgery, Cork University Hospital, Wilton Road, Cork, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kang HX, Ma JY, Su YY, Kang S, Feng BJ, Feng XB, Wang XS, Lu YY. Risk factors of temperature increase after cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1120499. [PMID: 37035204 PMCID: PMC10073652 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1120499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) is the standard treatment for patients with peritoneal cancer (PC). Following CRS-HIPEC, patients may also face risks caused by whole body hyperthermia. This study analyzed the incidence of temperature increases following CRS-HIPEC and identified the attendant risk factors. Methods A retrospective analysis was carried out among 458 patients who received CRS-HIPEC at the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University between August 2018 and January 2021. The patients were divided into two groups according to post-HIPEC axillary temperature (≥38°C), with the demographics and the laboratory test results subsequently analyzed and compared, and the risk factors pertaining to temperature increases analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Results During CRS-HIPEC, 32.5% (149/458) of the patients with a temperature increase had an axillary temperature of not lower than 38°C, and 8.5% (39/458) of the patients with hyperpyrexia had an axillary temperature of not lower than 39°C. Female gender, gynecological malignancies, type of chemotherapy drug, increased postoperative neutrophil percentage, and a sharp drop in postoperative prealbumin were associated with the incidence of a temperature increase and axillary temperatures of >38°C. Among these factors, the type of chemotherapy drug was identified as an independent risk factor for a temperature increase during CRS-HIPEC. Conclusion By determining the risk factors pertaining to temperature increases during CRS-HIPEC, medical staff can identify the attendant risks among the patients and thus take preventive measures in a timely manner to maintain the patient's body temperature at a stable level. This suggests that further clinical research should be conducted to build a risk-prediction model for temperature increases following CRS-HIPEC.
Collapse
|
6
|
van Stein RM, Lok CA, Aalbers AG, H.J.T. de Hingh I, Houwink AP, Stoevelaar HJ, Sonke GS, van Driel WJ. Standardizing HIPEC and perioperative care for patients with ovarian cancer in the Netherlands using a Delphi-based consensus. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2022; 39:100945. [PMID: 35252523 PMCID: PMC8894234 DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2022.100945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Revised: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Implementation of HIPEC for ovarian cancer is ongoing, aiming to offer this treatment to all eligible patients in the Netherlands. Standardization reduces unwanted variation in clinical treatment. We intend to standardize patient selection, technical aspects, and perioperative care of CRS and HIPEC. This consensus study comprised a two-phase modified Delphi approach. Consensus was reached on 82% of items.
Objective Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) is standard of care in the Netherlands in patients with stage III epithelial ovarian cancer following interval cytoreductive surgery (CRS). Differences in patient selection, technical aspects, and perioperative management exist between centers performing HIPEC. Standardization aims to reduce unwanted variation in clinical practice. As part of an implementation process, we aimed to standardize perioperative care for patients treated with CRS and HIPEC using a Delphi-based consensus approach. Methods We performed a two-phase modified Delphi method involving a multidisciplinary panel of 40 experts who completed a survey on CRS and HIPEC. During a consensus meeting, survey outcomes and available scientific evidence was discussed. Items without consensus (<75% agreement) were adjusted and evaluated in a second survey. Results Consensus was reached in the first round on 51% of items. After two rounds, consensus was reached on the majority of items (82%) including patient selection, preoperative workup, technical aspects of CRS and HIPEC, and postoperative care. No consensus was reached on the role of HIPEC in rare ovarian cancer types, preoperative bowel preparation, timing to create bowel anastomoses, and manipulation of the perfusate. Conclusions Dutch experts reached consensus on most items regarding interval CRS and HIPEC for ovarian cancer. This consensus study may help to align treatment protocols and to minimize practice variation. Topics without consensus may be put on the research agenda of HIPEC for ovarian cancer.
Collapse
|
7
|
Kang J, Li H, Shi X, Ma E, Chen W. Validation of the efficacy of the NUTRISCORE for the nutritional screening of cancer patients in China. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:43. [PMID: 34991505 PMCID: PMC8740059 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-09135-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Malnutrition is common in cancer patients. The NUTRISCORE is a newly developed cancer-specific nutritional screening tool and was validated by comparison with the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) and Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST) in Spain. We aimed to evaluate the performance of the NUTRISCORE, MST, and PG-SGA in estimating the risk of malnutrition in Chinese cancer patients. Methods Data from an open parallel and multicenter cross-sectional study in 29 clinical teaching hospitals in 14 Chinese cities were used. Cancer patients were assessed for malnutrition using the PG-SGA, NUTRISCORE, and MST. The sensitivity, specificity, and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were estimated for the NUTRISCORE and MST using the PG-SGA as a reference. Results A total of 1000 cancer patients were included. The mean age was 55.9 (19 to 92 years), and 47.5% were male. Of these patients, 450 (45.0%) had PG-SGA B and C, 29 (2.9%) had a NUTRISCORE ≥5, and 367 (36.7%) had an MST ≥ 2. Using the PG-SGA as a reference, the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve values of the NUTRISCORE were found to be 6.2, 99.8%, and 0.53, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve values of the MST were 50.9, 74.9%, and 0.63, respectively. The kappa index between the NUTRISCORE and PG-SGA was 0.066, and that between the MST and PG-SGA was 0.262 (P < 0.05). Conclusions The NUTRISCORE had an extremely low sensitivity in cancer patients in China compared with the MST when the PG-SGA was used as a reference.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junren Kang
- Department of Clinical Nutrition, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, #1 Shuai Fu Yuan, Beijing, 100730, Dongcheng District, China
| | - Hailong Li
- Department of Clinical Nutrition, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, #1 Shuai Fu Yuan, Beijing, 100730, Dongcheng District, China
| | - Xiaodong Shi
- Department of Clinical Nutrition, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, #1 Shuai Fu Yuan, Beijing, 100730, Dongcheng District, China
| | - Enling Ma
- Department of Clinical Nutrition, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, #1 Shuai Fu Yuan, Beijing, 100730, Dongcheng District, China
| | - Wei Chen
- Department of Clinical Nutrition, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, #1 Shuai Fu Yuan, Beijing, 100730, Dongcheng District, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Strijker D, Meijerink WJHJ, Bremers AJA, de Reuver P, van Laarhoven CJHM, van den Heuvel B. Prehabilitation to improve postoperative outcomes in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis undergoing hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC): A scoping review. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021:S0748-7983(21)00757-5. [PMID: 34702591 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Revised: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 10/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) leads to increased survival rates in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, but is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality rates. Prehabilitation, a process to optimize a patient's preoperative functional capacity, has a positive impact on recovery after colorectal surgery. The impact of prehabilitation in patients undergoing HIPEC is scarcely investigated. This scoping review and narrative synthesis aims to summarize and evaluate what is currently reported about the effect of prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes after HIPEC. METHODS A literature search of studies reporting on the effect of prehabilitation on outcomes after HIPEC was performed (August 2020). Study characteristics, patient demographics, composition of prehabilitation programs, and reported outcomes used to quantify the effect of prehabilitation were recorded. RESULTS The literature search did not yield any studies on the effect of prehabilitation programs on outcomes after HIPEC. As an alternative, studies identifying modifiable risk factors for poor postoperative outcomes after HIPEC that can be targeted by prehabilitation were reviewed to evaluate starting points for prehabilitation. Fourteen studies identify the following preoperative factors: poor nutritional status, poor performance status, low health related quality of life and an history of smoking. CONCLUSION No research has been published on the effect of prehabilitation prior to HIPEC. This review demonstrates that preoperative modifiable risk factors for outcomes in patients undergoing HIPEC are multifactorial. A multimodal prehabilitation program prior to HIPEC, including nutritional support, psychical exercise, psychological support and smoking cessation, might therefore be a promising approach to improve postoperative outcomes.
Collapse
|
9
|
Di Giorgio A, Rotolo S, Cintoni M, Rinninella E, Pulcini G, Schena CA, Ferracci F, Grassi F, Raoul P, Moroni R, Pacelli F, Gasbarrini A, Mele MC. The prognostic value of skeletal muscle index on clinical and survival outcomes after cytoreduction and HIPEC for peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 48:649-656. [PMID: 34696936 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Revised: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 10/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hypertermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) represent the most effective strategy to manage peritoneal metastases (PM). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the impact of body composition on clinical outcomes in patients with PM. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed using Medline, Web of Science and EMBASE databases from inception to the 20st August 2020. Data were independently extracted by 3 authors. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess quality and risk of bias of studies. Pooled analyses were performed using Mantel-Haenszel method to estimate overall effect size with mean differences or odd ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The primary outcome was postoperative complication (POC) rate, while secondary outcomes were severe POC and postoperative mortality. RESULTS A total of 4 studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis, including 582 patients. A significant association between low skeletal muscle mass and POC was found (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.03; p = 0.03), while no differences were found in terms operative time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, and postoperative mortality (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Low skeletal muscle mass at diagnosis is a valid prognostic factor for POC development in colorectal and PM patients undergoing CRS. Prospective and larger studies are needed to better investigate the role of CT scan derived body composition and to understand how to implement this tool in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Di Giorgio
- UOS Trattamenti Integrati Della Carcinosi Peritoneale Avanzata, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefano Rotolo
- UOC Chirurgia Del Peritoneo e Del Retroperitoneo, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy; Dipartimento di Discipline Chirurgiche, Oncologiche e Stomatologiche (Di.Chir.On.S.), Università Degli Studi di Palermo, Via Liborio Giuffrè 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Marco Cintoni
- Scuola di Specializzazione in Scienza Dell'Alimentazione, Università di Roma Tor Vergata, Via Montpellier 1, 00133, Rome, Italy.
| | - Emanuele Rinninella
- UOC di Nutrizione Clinica, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriele Pulcini
- UOSD di Nutrizione Avanzata in Oncologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo Alberto Schena
- UOC Chirurgia Del Peritoneo e Del Retroperitoneo, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Federica Ferracci
- UOC Chirurgia Del Peritoneo e Del Retroperitoneo, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Futura Grassi
- UOC di Nutrizione Clinica, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Pauline Raoul
- UOSD di Nutrizione Avanzata in Oncologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Rossana Moroni
- Direzione Scientifica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Pacelli
- UOC Chirurgia Del Peritoneo e Del Retroperitoneo, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Gasbarrini
- UOC Medicina Interna e Gastroenterologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy; Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Largo F. Vito 1, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Cristina Mele
- UOSD di Nutrizione Avanzata in Oncologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy; Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Largo F. Vito 1, 00168, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ong XYS, Sultana R, Tan JWS, Tan QX, Wong JSM, Chia CS, Ong CAJ. The Role of Total Parenteral Nutrition in Patients with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:4156. [PMID: 34439309 PMCID: PMC8393754 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13164156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Revised: 08/13/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is often associated with malnutrition and an inability to tolerate enteral feeding. Although total parenteral nutrition (TPN) can be lifesaving for patients with no other means of nutritional support, its use in the management of PC patients remains controversial. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the benefit of TPN on the overall survival of PC patients, in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. A total of 187 articles were screened; 10 were included in this review and eight were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled median overall survival of patients who received TPN was significantly higher than patients who did not receive TPN (p = 0.040). When only high-quality studies were included, a significant survival advantage was observed in PC patients receiving TPN (p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis of patients receiving chemotherapy demonstrated a significant survival benefit (p = 0.008) associated with the use of TPN. In conclusion, TPN may improve survival outcomes in PC patients. However, further studies are needed to conclude more definitively on the effect of TPN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xing-Yi Sarah Ong
- Department of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore 169610, Singapore; (X.-Y.S.O.); (J.W.-S.T.); (Q.X.T.); (J.S.M.W.); (C.S.C.)
- Department of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore 169608, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore;
- Laboratory of Applied Human Genetics, Division of Medical Sciences, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore 169610, Singapore
| | | | - Joey Wee-Shan Tan
- Department of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore 169610, Singapore; (X.-Y.S.O.); (J.W.-S.T.); (Q.X.T.); (J.S.M.W.); (C.S.C.)
- Department of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore 169608, Singapore
- Laboratory of Applied Human Genetics, Division of Medical Sciences, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore 169610, Singapore
| | - Qiu Xuan Tan
- Department of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore 169610, Singapore; (X.-Y.S.O.); (J.W.-S.T.); (Q.X.T.); (J.S.M.W.); (C.S.C.)
- Department of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore 169608, Singapore
- Laboratory of Applied Human Genetics, Division of Medical Sciences, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore 169610, Singapore
| | - Jolene Si Min Wong
- Department of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore 169610, Singapore; (X.-Y.S.O.); (J.W.-S.T.); (Q.X.T.); (J.S.M.W.); (C.S.C.)
- Department of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore 169608, Singapore
| | - Claramae Shulyn Chia
- Department of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore 169610, Singapore; (X.-Y.S.O.); (J.W.-S.T.); (Q.X.T.); (J.S.M.W.); (C.S.C.)
- Department of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore 169608, Singapore
- SingHealth Duke-NUS Oncology Academic Clinical Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore
| | - Chin-Ann Johnny Ong
- Department of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore 169610, Singapore; (X.-Y.S.O.); (J.W.-S.T.); (Q.X.T.); (J.S.M.W.); (C.S.C.)
- Department of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore 169608, Singapore
- Laboratory of Applied Human Genetics, Division of Medical Sciences, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore 169610, Singapore
- SingHealth Duke-NUS Oncology Academic Clinical Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore
- Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, A*STAR Research Entities, Singapore 138673, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dhiman A, Fenton E, Whitridge J, Belanski J, Petersen W, Macaraeg S, Rangrass G, Shergill A, Micic D, Eng OS, Turaga K. Guide to Enhanced Recovery for Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgery: ERAS for Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery with or Without HIPEC. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:6955-6964. [PMID: 33954868 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-09973-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
ERAS protocols may reduce length of stay and return to full functional recovery after cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC. Prehabilitation programs and post-operative goal directed pathways, along with other essential components of ERAS are discussed with supporting evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankit Dhiman
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave, MC 5094, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Emily Fenton
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave, MC 5094, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Jeffrey Whitridge
- University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jennifer Belanski
- University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Whitney Petersen
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave, MC 5094, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Sarah Macaraeg
- University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Govind Rangrass
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Dejan Micic
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Oliver S Eng
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave, MC 5094, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Kiran Turaga
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave, MC 5094, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
IJmker-Hemink VE, Wanten GJA, de Nes LCF, van den Berg MGA. Effect of a Preoperative Home-Delivered, Protein-Rich Meal Service to Improve Protein Intake in Surgical Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2020; 45:479-489. [PMID: 32895969 DOI: 10.1002/jpen.2015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2020] [Accepted: 09/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The preoperative period likely provides an important opportunity to improve postoperative recovery, as suggested by the finding that low nutrition status is a predictor of increased postoperative complications and longer length of stay (LOS). It was investigated whether a home-delivered, protein-rich meal service improves protein intake relative to requirements within 3 weeks prior to surgery compared to usual care (UC). METHODS This randomized controlled trial included adults (n = 126) with planned surgery performed at the orthopedics, urology, gynecology, or general surgery departments. The intervention group received 6 protein-rich dishes per day for 3 weeks, and the control group sustained their usual diet. Dietary intake, nutrition status, hand grip strength, physical performance, and quality of life were assessed at baseline and after 3 weeks. Patient satisfaction was reported after 3 weeks, and data on complications and LOS were reported 30 days after surgery. RESULTS Protein intake relative to requirements significantly improved by 16%, and energy intake relative to requirements increased by 19% for the meal service, as compared with UC. The intervention group experienced significantly less stress with preparing meals and were more satisfied with the presentation of the meals than the control group. No significant effects of the intervention were detected on other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION The home-delivered, protein-rich meal service was successfully implemented before surgery and improved protein and energy intake relative to requirements within 3 weeks while patient satisfaction maintained. The preoperative period serves as a window of opportunity to prepare patients before hospitalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vera E IJmker-Hemink
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dietetics and Intestinal Failure, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Geert J A Wanten
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Manon G A van den Berg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dietetics and Intestinal Failure, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lorenzon L, Brandl A, Guiral DC, Hoogwater F, Lundon D, Marano L, Montagna G, Polom K, Primavesi F, Schrage Y, Gonzalez-Moreno S, Kovacs T, D'Ugo D, Sandrucci S. Nutritional assessment in surgical oncology: An ESSO-EYSAC global survey. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 46:2074-2082. [PMID: 32938568 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.08.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2020] [Revised: 08/21/2020] [Accepted: 08/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The majority of cancer patients report malnutrition, with a significant impact on patient's outcome. This study aimed to compare how nutritional assessment is conducted across different surgical oncology sub-specialties. METHODS Survey modules were designed for breast, hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB), upper-gastrointestinal (UGI), sarcoma, peritoneal and surface malignancies (PSM) and colorectal cancer (CRC) surgeries to describe 4 domains: participants' setting, evaluation of clinical factors, use of screening tools and clinical practice. Results were compared among sub-specialties and according to human development index (HDI) in the largest cohorts. RESULTS Out of 457 answers from 377 global participants (62% European), 35.0% were from breast and 28.9% were from CRC surgeons. Although MDTs management is consistently reported (64-88%), the presence of a nutritionist/dietician ranges from 14.1% to 44.2%. Breast surgeons seldom evaluate albumin (25.6%) and weight loss (30.6%), opposite to HPB, PSM and UGI groups (>70%, p 0.044). Overall, responders declared that the use of screening tools is largely neglected, that nutritional status is often assessed by the surgeons and that nutrition is not consistently modified according to risk factors (range among groups respectively: 1.9%-25.6%, 33.1%-51.4%, 33.1%-60.5%). Less than 20% of breast surgeons assess patients before/after surgery, comparing to >60% of PSM surgeons. However, no statistical differences were documented comparing groups for the majority of the items of the 4 domains. Nutritional evaluation is more often conducted by breast surgeons in medium/low HDI countries comparing very high/high HDI (p 0.04). CONCLUSIONS Nutritional assessment is largely neglected. These results identify target-issues for the implementation of clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Lorenzon
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.
| | - Andreas Brandl
- Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Digestive Unit, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Delia Cortes Guiral
- Universitary Hospital Principe de Asturias, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain
| | - Frederik Hoogwater
- University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Dara Lundon
- The Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Luigi Marano
- University of Siena, Department of Medicine, Surgery, and Neurosciences, Siena, Italy
| | - Giacomo Montagna
- Universitätsspital Basel Switzerland, Department of Surgery, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Karol Polom
- Medical University of Gdansk, Department of Surgical Oncology, Gdansk, Poland
| | - Florian Primavesi
- Medical University of Innsbruck, Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Yvonne Schrage
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | - Tibor Kovacs
- Breast Surgery Unit, Guy's Hospital, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Domenico D'Ugo
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hübner M, Kusamura S, Villeneuve L, Al-Niaimi A, Alyami M, Balonov K, Bell J, Bristow R, Guiral DC, Fagotti A, Falcão LFR, Glehen O, Lambert L, Mack L, Muenster T, Piso P, Pocard M, Rau B, Sgarbura O, Somashekhar SP, Wadhwa A, Altman A, Fawcett W, Veerapong J, Nelson G. Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) with or without hyperthermic IntraPEritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC): Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations - Part II: Postoperative management and special considerations. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 46:2311-23. [PMID: 32826114 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways have been shown to considerably reduce complications, length of stay and costs after most of surgical procedures by standardised application of best evidence-based perioperative care. The aim was to elaborate dedicated recommendations for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) ± hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in a two-part series of guidelines based on expert consensus. The present part II of the guidelines highlights postoperative management and special considerations. METHODS The core group assembled a multidisciplinary panel of 24 experts involved in peritoneal surface malignancy surgery representing the fields of general surgery (n = 12), gynaecological surgery (n = 6), and anaesthesia (n = 6). Experts systematically reviewed and summarized the available evidence on 72 identified perioperative care items, following the GRADE (grading of recommendations, assessment, development, evaluation) system. Final consensus (defined as ≥50%, or ≥70% of weak/strong recommendations combined) was reached by a standardised 2-round Delphi process, regarding the strength of recommendations. RESULTS Response rates were 100% for both Delphi rounds. Quality of evidence was evaluated high, moderate low and very low, for 15 (21%), 26 (36%), 29 (40%) and 2 items, respectively. Consensus was reached for 71/72(98.6%) items. Strong recommendations were defined for 37 items. No consensus could be reached regarding the preemptive use of fresh frozen plasma. CONCLUSION The present ERAS recommendations for CRS ± HIPEC are based on a standardised expert consensus process providing clinicians with valuable guidance. There is an urgent need to produce high quality studies for CRS ± HIPEC and to prospectively evaluate recommendations in clinical practice.
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
Cytoreductive surgery followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy is an aggressive, potentially curative approach used to treat locoregional disease associated with primary and secondary malignancies of the peritoneum. It involves resection of all macroscopic disease larger than 2.5 mm, followed by instillation of hyperthermic chemotherapy directly into the peritoneum for higher drug exposure to microscopic disease. In select patients with primary peritoneal mesothelioma, pseudomyxoma peritonei, colorectal adenocarcinoma, appendiceal adenocarcinoma, or ovarian cancer, with no extra-abdominal metastasis and limited involvement of the peritoneum, the procedure can be performed to increase overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Pletcher
- Surgery Department, Mount Sinai West and Morningside, 425 West 59th Street, 7th Floor, New York, NY 10019, USA
| | - Elizabeth Gleeson
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Mount Sinai Hospital, 19 East 98th Street, Suite 7A, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Daniel Labow
- Surgery Department, Mount Sinai Hospital, Mount Sinai West and Morningside, 425 West 59th Street, 7th Floor, New York, NY 10019, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pameijer C, Lewcun J, Pauli E. Incisional hernia formation can be reduced following hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with increased suture length to wound length ratio fascial closure. Int J Abdom Wall Hernia Surg 2020. [DOI: 10.4103/ijawhs.ijawhs_30_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|
17
|
Solanki SL, Mukherjee S, Agarwal V, Thota RS, Balakrishnan K, Shah SB, Desai N, Garg R, Ambulkar RP, Bhorkar NM, Patro V, Sinukumar S, Venketeswaran MV, Joshi MP, Chikkalingegowda RH, Gottumukkala V, Owusu-Agyemang P, Saklani AP, Mehta SS, Seshadri RA, Bell JC, Bhatnagar S, Divatia JV. Society of Onco-Anaesthesia and Perioperative Care consensus guidelines for perioperative management of patients for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC). Indian J Anaesth 2019; 63:972-987. [PMID: 31879421 PMCID: PMC6921319 DOI: 10.4103/ija.ija_765_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2019] [Revised: 10/28/2019] [Accepted: 11/18/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) for primary peritoneal malignancies or peritoneal spread of malignant neoplasm is being done at many centres worldwide. Perioperative management is challenging with varied haemodynamic and temperature instabilities, and the literature is scarce in many aspects of its perioperative management. There is a need to have coalition of the existing evidence and experts' consensus opinion for better perioperative management. The purpose of this consensus practice guideline is to provide consensus for best practice pattern based on the best available evidence by the expert committee of the Society of Onco-Anaesthesia and Perioperative Care comprising perioperative physicians for better perioperative management of patients of CRS-HIPEC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sohan Lal Solanki
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Address for correspondence: Dr. Sohan Lal Solanki, Department of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain, 2nd Floor, Main Building, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai - 400 012, Maharashtra, India. E-mail:
| | - Sudipta Mukherjee
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care Medicine and Pain, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Vandana Agarwal
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Raghu S Thota
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Kalpana Balakrishnan
- Department of Anaesthesia, Pain and Palliative Care, Cancer Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Shagun Bhatia Shah
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, Delhi, India
| | - Neha Desai
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care Medicine and Pain, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Rakesh Garg
- Department of Onco-Anaesthesiology and Palliative Medicine, Dr BRAIRCH, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Reshma P Ambulkar
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | | | - Viplab Patro
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care Medicine and Pain, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Snita Sinukumar
- Surgical Oncology, Jehangir Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| | | | - Malini P Joshi
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | | | - Vijaya Gottumukkala
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Pascal Owusu-Agyemang
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Avanish P Saklani
- Gastro-Intestinal Services, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sanket Sharad Mehta
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Saifee Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | | | - John C Bell
- Anaesthetics and Intensive Care Medicine, Peritoneal Malignancy Institute, Hampshire Hospitals NHS FT, Basingstoke, United Kingdom
| | - Sushma Bhatnagar
- Department of Onco-Anaesthesiology and Palliative Medicine, Dr BRAIRCH, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Jigeeshu V Divatia
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|