Limited Reporting of Histopathologic Details in a Multi-Institutional Academic Cohort of Phyllodes Tumors: Time for Standardization

Real-world data on malignant and borderline phyllodes tumors of the breast: A population-based study of all 921 cases in the Netherlands (1989 -2020)

AIM

The aim of our study is to analyze patterns in treatment and outcome in a population-based series of patients with borderline and malignant phyllodes tumors (PT).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data on all patients with a borderline or malignant PT (1989-2020) were extracted from the Netherlands Cancer Registry and the Dutch nationwide pathology databank (Palga) and retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

We included 921 patients (borderline PT n = 452 and malignant PT n = 469). Borderline PT patients more often had breast-conserving surgery (BCS) as final surgery (81 vs. 46%). BCS rates for borderline PT increased over time (OR 1.08 per year, 95%CI 1.04 - 1.13, P < 0.001). In malignant PT adjuvant radiotherapy was given in 14.7%; this rate increased over time (OR 1.07 per year, 95%CI 1.02 - 1.13, P = 0.012). Local recurrence rate (5-year estimate of cumulative incidence) was 8.7% (95%CI 6.0-11.4) for borderline PT and 11.7% (95%CI 8.6-14.8) for malignant PT (P = 0.187) and was related to tumor size ≥ 20 mm (HR 10.6 (95%CI 1.5-76.8) and positive margin (HR 3.0 (95%CI 1.6-5.6), p < 0.001), but not to negative margin width (HR 1.3 ( 95%CI 0.7-2.3), p = 0.350)). Distant metastasis occurred only in malignant PT with a 5-year cumulative incidence of 4.7% (95%CI 3.3 - 6.1).

CONCLUSION

This population-based series showed an increase in BCS in borderline PT and an increase in adjuvant radiotherapy in malignant PT over time. We identified malignant PT, BCS, larger tumor size and positive final margins as possible risk factors for local recurrence. Small but negative margins can be accepted.

Margin Status and Local Recurrence in Phyllodes Tumours of the Breast: A Canadian Series

BACKGROUND

Phyllodes tumours of the breast are rare fibroepithelial neoplasms with a propensity for recurrence. While surgical excision remains the standard of care, the optimal margin width is an area of active investigation. Recent studies have questioned the necessity for wide, local excision.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, cohort study of patients with phyllodes tumours treated at our institution between 2003 and 2021. Demographic, histopathological, and recurrence data were captured; malignant phyllodes were excluded. Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify covariates associated with local recurrence.

RESULTS

Of 187 patients with phyllodes tumours, 82.9% (n = 155) were classified as benign while 17.1% (n = 32) were borderline. Initial surgical margins were positive in 26.2% (n = 49), < 2 mm in 50.8% (n = 95), and ≥ 2 mm in 23% (n = 43) patients. Among patients with positive margins, 61.2% (n = 30) underwent margin revision. At a median follow-up of 2.9 years, the recurrence rate was 3.7%. On univariate analysis, only a positive margin at the time of initial surgery and not margin width was significantly associated with a higher rate of disease recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 9.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.85-49.2), as was a size greater than 4 cm on preoperative imaging (HR 10.78, 95% CI 0.97-120.1). Revision of an initially positive margin was not significantly associated with decreased local recurrence (p = 1).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large cohort of benign and borderline phyllodes tumours, positive resection margins and not margin width at the initial surgery were associated with a increased recurrence. Individualization of decisions regarding margin reexcision is important.

Clinical utility of breast pathology data: implications for practising pathologists

In breast cancer, the quality of the pathology services is of paramount importance as inevitably, the pathologist makes the confirmatory diagnosis and provides prognostic and predictive information, informing treatment plans directly. Various national and international organisations provide a pathology reporting minimum dataset (MDS) to ensure consistency in reporting. While the use of MDS promotes clarity, there may be specific areas requiring the pathologist's input for individual patients and hence pathologists need to be aware of the clinical utility of pathology data to help tailor individualised patient treatment. In this article, we provide numerous examples of the role of pathology data in determining next steps in the patient pathway that are applicable to both the diagnostic and treatment pathways, including neoadjuvant treatment pathways. We also briefly discuss the important role and thereby the clinical utility of pathology data during the COVID-19 pandemic providing a template for the similar scenarios in the future if required.

Morphological features of 52 cases of breast phyllodes tumours with local recurrence

Typical phyllodes tumours (PTs) of the breast are fibroepithelial neoplasms characterised histologically by stromal hypercellularity and leaf-like structures. However, morphological changes may be atypical in some cases, increasing the difficulty of diagnosis and the likelihood of misdiagnosis. To provide more morphological clues for pathological diagnosis of PTs, we retrospectively analysed 52 PT cases with typical morphological features after recurrence, and summarized the clinicopathological characteristics of the paired primary tumours. We found five special histological features in the primary tumours distinct from classic PTs, namely (1) PTs with epithelioid feature (three cases); (2) PTs with gland-rich feature (eight cases); (3) PTs with fibroadenoma-like feature (20 cases); (4) PTs with myxoid fibroadenoma-like feature (five cases); and (5) PTs with pseudohemangiomatoid stromal hyperplasia–like feature (four cases). All the features can exist independently, and a few cases displayed more than two distinctive features at the same time. In this cohort of recurrent PTs, all the primary tumours were absent of recognisable stromal hypercellularity and leaf-like structures that are the critical diagnostic criteria of PTs; however, they showed some other non-classic characteristics which may provide significant clues for the diagnosis of PTs. Particularly, tumours with epithelioid feature displayed high grade at earlier stages, tumours with fibroadenoma-like feature were most likely to be confused with classical fibroadenomas, and tumours with myxoid feature were prone to be neglected because of their hypocellularity.

Margin Management and Adjuvant Therapy for Phyllodes Tumors: Practice Patterns of the American Society of Breast Surgeons Members

BACKGROUND

Phyllodes tumors (PTs) are rare breast neoplasms with variable clinical behavior by histologic type: benign, borderline, or malignant. Until recently, management guidelines recommended one approach for all subtypes.

METHODS

A 21-question survey was sent to American Society of Breast Surgeon members to evaluate management patterns by subtype. Surgeon demographics, decisions regarding management of margins, re-excision, surveillance, and synoptic reporting were collected. Chi-square or analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used as appropriate, with significance set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 493 of 2969 surveys were completed for a response rate of 18.3%. Among the survey takers, 55% were fellowship trained, 72% were in practice > 10 years, and 82% performed > 100 breast cases per year. Although 25% of respondents enucleate a mass with clinical suspicion of a PT alone, this decreased to 18% if a preoperative core biopsy performed was suggestive of PT. For margin management, 47% do not re-excise positive margins for benign PTs, but 96% would for a borderline or malignant PTs (p < 0.001). Only 2% perform axillary staging for malignant PTs, and 90% refer borderline or malignant PTs for radiation. Two-year surveillance was performed by about half of respondents for benign PT. However, two-thirds of respondents would increase surveillance to 5 years for borderline or malignant PTs. Only 38% report a templated synoptic pathology report at their institution.

CONCLUSION

PT management patterns are evolving but still variable when looking at initial margin intent, decision for re-excision, radiation referral, pathologic reporting, and surveillance. This suggests the need for more specific management guidelines by subtype given differences in clinical behavior.

Re-Classification with Outcome Correlation of Previously Diagnosed Malignant Phyllodes Tumors Applying the 2016 Consensus Guidelines

Background. Classification of phyllodes tumors is challenging due unclear diagnostic criteria, recently addressed by consensus review criteria. Herein, we reviewed all malignant phyllodes tumor resections and reclassified them based on the consensus guidelines, correlating with outcome. We hypothesize that application of criteria would result in a significant proportion being "down-graded" to either borderline or benign phyllodes tumor. Methods. Primary resections of malignant phyllodes tumor were reviewed by four AP board-certified, breast fellowship-trained pathologists. Morphologic variables delineated in consensus guidelines (ie stromal cellularity, cellular atypia, tumor border, presence of heterologous elements, presence of stromal overgrowth) were evaluated. Following review, cases were reclassified as benign, borderline, or malignant. Results. Upon reclassification, 20% (5/20) cases were "down-graded" to borderline phyllodes tumor while 80% (15/20) remained malignant phyllodes tumor. Two morphologic features were statistically significant including broadly infiltrating tumor border in 80% (12/15) of malignant phyllodes tumors compared to none in borderline phyllodes tumor (0/5) (p = 0.004) and stromal overgrowth in 67% (10/15) of malignant phyllodes tumor compared to none in borderline phyllodes tumors (0/5) (p = 0.03). Upon review of the pathology reports, 30% (6/20) contained all 5 histomorphologic variables delineated in the consensus review criteria. Malignant phyllodes tumor resulted in five cases with recurrence (33.3%, 5/15) and three cases with metastases (20.0%, 3/15) and borderline phyllodes tumor resulted in one case with recurrence (20.0%, 1/5) and no metastases (0/5). Conclusion. The consensus guidelines for phyllodes tumor are useful for subclassification. We hypothesize that standardize reporting of the histomorphologic variables may lead to better consensus.

Phyllodes Tumors: A Scoping Review of the Literature

PURPOSE

Phyllodes tumors are rare tumors of the breast, with most literature being retrospective with limited guidelines on the management of these patients. Scoping review was performed to highlight themes and gaps in the available literature.

METHODS

A scoping review of the literature was performed as per PRISMA-ScR guidelines with titles, abstracts, and full texts reviewed in duplicate. Data were abstracted and summarized in categories of diagnostics, surgical management, adjuvant therapies, treatment of recurrence, and surveillance. Quality assessment was performed for each paper.

RESULTS

The search identified 4498 references, 434 full-text papers were reviewed, and 183 papers were included. Ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and core needle biopsy are valuable preoperative diagnostics tools. Pathology reporting should include stromal overgrowth, stromal cellularity, nuclear atypia, mitotic rate, borders, and presence of heterologous elements. Ki67 may have a role in grading and prognosticating. Breast conservation is safe in all grades of phyllodes but may be associated with increased local recurrence in malignant phyllodes. Surgical margins should depend on grade. Axillary node positivity rate is very low, even with clinically enlarged lymph nodes. Adjuvant radiation is a useful tool to decrease local recurrence in malignant phyllodes tumors, tumors > 5 cm, age < 45 years, close margins, and breast conservation. There is no evidence supporting adjuvant chemotherapy. Recurrence can be managed with repeat wide excision; however, mastectomy is associated with lower re-recurrence. Surveillance protocols are variable in the literature.

CONCLUSIONS

There is heterogeneity in the literature on phyllodes tumors. Consensus guidelines based on the literature will help provide evidence-based care.