Management of an infected preauricular sinus, using a lacrimal probe

Management of the infected preauricular sinus

INTRODUCTION

The preauricular sinus is a common finding in children and may often be complicated by infection. Complete excision of the sinus is the only definitive cure. Failure to recognise the presence of a sinus, particularly when infection erupts away from the sinus, may lead to inadequate management and unnecessary surgery.

AIM

We report our experience in managing infected preauricular sinuses and highlight important points in our surgical technique.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of our electronic patient database for all paediatric patients who underwent surgical excision of preauricular sinuses by the senior author at Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children between January 2013 and October 2022.

RESULTS

A total of 10 patients underwent surgical management of 11 preauricular sinuses with a median follow-up time of 40 months (range 1-136). Eight patients underwent excision of the preauricular sinus due to infection. All infected cases affected the preauricular cheek skin and had previously undergone at least one unsuccessful surgical drainage prior to a referral to our unit. All cases were successfully operated on at our unit with no reported complications or recurrence.

CONCLUSION

A lack of awareness of the presence of a sinus and identification of a preauricular pit by the inexperienced clinician will result in inadequate treatment of this condition and potentially unnecessary surgical procedures. Our paper highlights the importance of correctly identifying the extent of the sinus and describes a safe and reliable technique to ensure complete removal of the preauricular sinus with satisfactorily low recurrence rates.

Surgical results of infected preauricular sinus: No need for delay

OBJECTIVES

This study was performed to propose the proper surgical timing of infected preauricular sinus (PAS) by comparing surgical results of active infection PAS group (AIPASG) to infection-controlled/or non-infected PAS group (IC/NIPASG).

METHODS

Two hundred and twelve patients with PAS who underwent surgical excision using minimal supra-auricular approach by one surgeon (S.N.P) in a tertiary referral center between Apr 1999 and Dec 2016 were enrolled in this study. Medical records of 36 patients of AIPASG at surgical time point and 176 patients of IC/NIPASG were collected and their surgical results were compared. Postoperative wound infection, recurrence, need of drain insertion or external compression dressing and other clinical parameters including age, sex, follow up duration and previous incision & drainage (I&D) history were investigated and statistically compared between two groups.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences of various clinical parameters between two groups, except previous I&D history (24 among 36 patients of AIPASG and 12 among 176 patients of NI/ICPASG, P < 0.05). Post-operative immediate but mild wound erythema was observed in 11 among 212 patients with no statistical difference between two groups (4 among 48 ears of AIPASG and 7 among 219 NI/ICPASG, P = 0.105) and was controlled by short-term antibiotics and conservative management. Only 1 patient of NI/ICPASG needed a revision surgery of wound exploration and curettage. No more recurrence of infection during their long-term follow-up period was observed in both groups.

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference in the surgical results of minimal supra-auricular approach of PAS excision between AIPASG and NI/ICPASG. Therefore, we suggest that this surgical technique can be performed even in the infected PAS which does not quickly respond to the conservative treatment.

The diagnosis and treatment of a variant type of auricular sinus: postauricular sinus

OBJECTIVES

To make otolaryngologists aware of the variant types of auricular sinus, we have performed a systematic review of patient diagnoses and presented our operative experiences.

METHODS

From 2009 to 2013 in Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, there was a total of 20 children with the variant type of auricular sinuses including the comprehensive group. Postauricular sinuses have pits located posterior to the imaginary vertical line that is tangent to the external auditory canal. Sinuses that penetrate the cartilage and cause postauricular swelling or skin defects characterize type 1 of the variant type, while sinuses that adhere to the cartilage and cause preauricular or auricular swelling or skin defects characterize type 2. Patients with pits both anterior to and posterior to the imaginary vertical line comprise the comprehensive group. The patients who had infected underwent auricular sinusectomy using a dual approach, with accurate fistula tracing and proper cartilage removal.

RESULTS

Sixteen children who had infected sinus underwent surgery, while the other four were asymptomatic. Ten children (62.5%) of 16 patients were diagnosed as type 1 of the variant type, 2 (12.5%) as type 2. Four children (25%) were diagnosis as the comprehensive group. The asymptomatic could not be defined as the sinuses location were unknown. Sixteen children (100%) of 16 patients who underwent surgery had a history of misdiagnosis and treatment. These patients did not experience recurrence over a 5-year follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

The locations of pits and sinuses help to categorize the different types of auricular sinus. The effective method that we have described should be considered a viable way to reduce recurrence.

A systematic review on the surgical outcome of preauricular sinus excision techniques

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Preauricular sinuses are benign congenital malformations of preauricular soft tissues. Complete excision using either sinectomy or supra-auricular approach is advised to prevent recurrence. Reported recurrence varies between 0 and 42%. We evaluated which surgical technique resulted in lowest complication and recurrence rates.

STUDY DESIGN

PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science.

METHODS

Two authors appraised studies on directness of evidence and risk of bias. Original data were extracted and pooled when I(2) was smaller than 50%. Results are reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement.

RESULTS

Fourteen high directness of evidence studies were included. Reported complication rates were similar: sinectomy [0-31.4%] and supra-auricular approach (SAA) [0-18.2%]. Pooled recurrence rates showed that sinectomy resulted in significantly (P = .04) more recurrence 5.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.6-8.3%) than SAA 2.2% (95% CI 0.7-7.0). Sinectomy using the microscope resulted in the lowest sinectomy recurrence rates (1.9%). SAA in combination with a Penrose drain resulted in 0% recurrence in revision cases. Drain use resulted in the lowest SAA recurrence rates; however, drain application was not advised due to higher complication rates (frequent wound infection [P = .003] and more [P = .002] and longer [P = .001] compression dressing use).

CONCLUSION

SAA could be the preferable technique for preauricular sinus removal. If despite evidence, sinectomy is elected over SAA, microscope use can further decrease recurrence rates comparable to SAA levels. Level of included evidence (Ib-IV) indicates the need for a prospective study comparing surgical outcomes between techniques. Laryngoscope, 126:1535-1544, 2016.

Preauricular sinus: a novel approach

Preauricular sinus is a congenital malformation of the preauricular soft tissues with varied incidence and recurrence after excision. The aetiology of the condition, its clinical features, and associations with other congenital malformations is discussed. In the symptomatic preauricular sinus exhibiting recurrent or persistent infection, opinion regarding optimal management varies. Personal experience is presented as Wide local excision by Extended Post auricular incision via Supra Auricular approach giving good results without recurrence in a follow up of 8 years. The use of magnification during the procedure is a valuable tool.

The preauricular sinus: factors contributing to recurrence after surgery

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to summarize clinical presentation, treatment, and recurrence of preauricular sinuses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective, institutional review board-approved study reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent preauricular fistulectomy between January 1995 and June 2005 at university-based hospitals in South Korea. Only patients who underwent classic preauricular fistulectomy (not incision and drainage) and could be followed up for at least 3 months were included in the study.

RESULTS

A total of 191 patients (206 ears) were enrolled. The right and left ears were involved in 79 and 97 patients, respectively. The most common location of the preauricular pit was the anterior margin of the ascending limb of the helix (93.2%). The most common indication for surgery was the recurrent exacerbation of acute infection (58.3%). The recurrence rate after surgery was 4.9%. Surgery under local anesthesia contributed to recurrence after the procedure (P = .009) and the cases that featured local infiltrative anesthesia had a higher rate of recurrence than the cases that had general anesthesia with an odds ratio of 6.875.

CONCLUSIONS

Although this study showed that surgery under local anesthesia contributed to recurrence, it did not mean that it was only the anesthesia technique that influenced the recurrence. Surgeons should bear in mind that complete removal of the epithelial lining provides a lower recurrence rate, especially under local anesthesia. The main limitation of this study was that recurrent cases were too few to allow a statistical analysis.

The preauricular sinus: A review of its aetiology, clinical presentation and management

The preauricular sinus is a not uncommon finding in the paediatric population. Recent reports have added to our knowledge of this benign malformation. We review the current literature with respect to the aetiology of the condition, its clinical features, and associations with other congenital malformations. In those patients in whom a preauricular sinus is identified, we recommend associated congenital anomalies be sought. In selected cases, a renal ultrasound scan may be appropriate. Where no associated abnormalities are identified, and where the preauricular sinus is asymptomatic, there is consensus opinion that no further action is indicated. In the acute phase of infection, treatment comprises administration of appropriate antibiotics, and incision and drainage of an abscess if present. In the symptomatic preauricular sinus exhibiting recurrent or persistent infection, opinion regarding optimal management varies. Latest evidence suggests definitive surgical treatment offering the most favourable outcome is by wide local excision of the sinus, as opposed to the previously preferred technique of simple sinectomy. Magnification employed during surgery, and opening, and following from the inside as well as outside, branching tracts of the sinus may further minimise the risk of recurrence.