ECMO use in Germany: An analysis of 29,929 ECMO runs

Factors influencing voriconazole plasma level in intensive care patients

Background

In clinical routine, voriconazole plasma trough levels (Cmin) out of target range are often observed with little knowledge about predisposing influences.

Objectives

To determine the distribution and influencing factors on voriconazole blood levels of patients treated on intensive- or intermediate care units (ICU/IMC).

Patients and methods

Data were collected retrospectively from patients with at least one voriconazole trough plasma level on ICU/IMC (n = 153) to determine the proportion of sub-, supra- or therapeutic plasma levels. Ordinal logistic regression analysis was used to assess factors hindering patients to reach voriconazole target range.

Results

Of 153 patients, only 71 (46%) reached the target range at the first therapeutic drug monitoring, whereas 66 (43%) patients experienced too-low and 16 (10%) too-high plasma levels. Ordinal logistic regression analysis identified the use of extra corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), low international normalized ratio (INR) and aspartate-aminotransferase (AST) serum levels as predictors for too-low plasma levels.

Conclusion

Our data highlight an association of ECMO, INR and AST levels with voriconazole plasma levels, which should be considered in the care of critically ill patients to optimize antifungal therapy with voriconazole.

[ECMO support during the first two waves of the corona pandemic-a survey of high case volume centers in Germany]

BACKGROUND

At the onset of the coronavirus pandemic, concerns were raised about sufficiency of available intensive care resources. In many places, routine interventions were postponed and criteria for the allocation of scarce resources were formulated. In Germany, some hospitals were at times seriously burdened during the course of the pandemic. Intensive care units in particular experienced a shortage of resources, which may have led to a restriction of services and a stricter indication setting for resource-intensive measures such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The aim of this work is to provide an overview of how these pressures were managed at large ECMO centers in Germany.

METHODS

One representative of each major ECMO referral center in Germany was invited to participate in an online survey in spring 2021.

RESULTS

Of 34 invitations that were sent out, the survey was answered by 23 participants. In all centers, routine procedures were postponed during the pandemic. Half of the centers increased the number of beds on which ECMO procedures could be offered. Nevertheless, in one-third of the centers, the start of at least one ECMO support was delayed because of a feared resource shortage. In 17% of centers, at least one patient was denied ECMO that he or she would have most likely received under prepandemic conditions.

CONCLUSION

The results of this online survey indicate that the experienced pressures and resource constraints led some centers to be cautious about ECMO indications.

Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Brazil: a case series

OBJECTIVE

The world has been suffering from the COVID-19 pandemic. Some COVID-19 patients develop severe viral pneumonia, requiring mechanical ventilation and measures to treat refractory hypoxemia, such as a protective ventilation strategy, prone positioning, and the use of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO). We describe a case series of 30 COVID-19 patients who needed VV-ECMO at the Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, located in the city of São Paulo, Brazil.

METHODS

We included all patients who required VV-ECMO due to COVID-19 pneumonia between March of 2020 and June of 2021.

RESULTS

Prior to VV-ECMO, patients presented with the following median scores: SOFA score, 11; APPS score, 7; Respiratory ECMO Survival Prediction score, 2; and Murray score, 3.3. The 60-day-in-hospital mortality was 33.3% (n = 10).

CONCLUSIONS

Although our patients had a highly severe profile, our results were similar to those of other cohort studies in the literature. This demonstrates that VV-ECMO can be a good tool even in a pandemic situation when it is managed in an experienced center.

Transfer of Veno-venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Patients With COVID-19 Associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Interhospital transport of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients bears transport-associated risks. It is unknown how interhospital extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) transfer of COVID-19 patients by mobile ECMO units affects ARDS mortality. We compared the outcome of 94 COVID-19 patients cannulated in primary care hospitals and retrieved by mobile ECMO-teams to that of 84 patients cannulated at five German ECMO centers. Patients were recruited from March 2020 to November 2021. Twenty-six transports were airborne, 68 were land-based. Age, sex, body-mass-index, Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II, days invasively ventilated, and P/F-Ratio before ECMO initiation were similar in both groups. Counting only regional transports (≤250 km), mean transport distance was 139.5 km ± 17.7 km for helicopter (duration 52.5 ± 10.6 minutes) and 69.8 km ± 44.1 km for ambulance or mobile intensive care unit (duration 57.6 ± 29.4 minutes). Overall time of vvECMO support (20.4 ± 15.2 ECMO days for transported patients vs. 21.0 ± 20.5 for control, p = 0.83) and days invasively ventilated (27.9 ± 18.1 days vs. 32.6 ± 25.1 days, p = 0.16) were similar. Overall mortality did not differ between transported patients and controls (57/94 [61%] vs. 51/83 [61%], p = 0.43). COVID-19 patients cannulated and retrieved by mobile ECMO-teams have no excess risk compared with patients receiving vvECMO at experienced ECMO centers. Patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS, limited comorbidities, and no contraindication for ECMO should be referred early to local ECMO centers.

Commercial and novel anticoagulant ECMO coatings: a review

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is an invasive and last-resort treatment for circulatory and respiratory failure. Prolonged ECMO support can disrupt the coagulation and anticoagulation systems in a patient, leading to adverse consequences, such as bleeding and thrombosis. To address this problem, anticoagulation coatings have been developed for use in ECMO circuits. This article reviews commonly used commercial and novel anticoagulant coatings developed in recent years and proposes a new classification of coatings based on the current state. While commercial coatings have been used clinically for decades, this review focuses on comparing the effectiveness and stability of coatings to support clinical selections. Furthermore, novel anticoagulation coatings often involve complex mechanisms and elaborate design strategies, and this review summarises representative studies on mainstream anticoagulation coatings to provide a point of reference for future studies.

Mortality rates of severe COVID-19-related respiratory failure with and without extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the Middle Ruhr Region of Germany

The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is discussed to improve patients' outcome in severe COVID-19 with respiratory failure, but data on ECMO remains controversial. The aim of the study was to determine the characteristics of patients under invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) with or without veno-venous ECMO support and to evaluate outcome parameters. Ventilated patients with COVID-19 with and without additional ECMO support were analyzed in a retrospective multicenter study regarding clinical characteristics, respiratory and laboratory parameters in day-to-day follow-up. Recruitment of patients was conducted during the first three COVID-19 waves at four German university hospitals of the Ruhr University Bochum, located in the Middle Ruhr Region. From March 1, 2020 to August 31, 2021, the charts of 149 patients who were ventilated for COVID-19 infection, were included (63.8% male, median age 67 years). Fifty patients (33.6%) received additional ECMO support. On average, ECMO therapy was initiated 15.6 ± 9.4 days after symptom onset, 10.6 ± 7.1 days after hospital admission, and 4.8 ± 6.4 days after the start of IMV. Male sex and higher SOFA and RESP scores were observed significantly more often in the high-volume ECMO center. Pre-medication with antidepressants was more often detected in survivors (22.0% vs. 6.5%; p = 0.006). ECMO patients were 14 years younger and presented a lower rate of concomitant cardiovascular diseases (18.0% vs. 47.5%; p = 0.0004). Additionally, cytokine-adsorption (46.0% vs. 13.1%; p < 0.0001) and renal replacement therapy (76.0% vs. 43.4%; p = 0.0001) were carried out more frequently; in ECMO patients thrombocytes were transfused 12-fold more often related to more than fourfold higher bleeding complications. Undulating C-reactive protein (CRP) and massive increase in bilirubin levels (at terminal stage) could be observed in deceased ECMO patients. In-hospital mortality was high (Overall: 72.5%, ECMO: 80.0%, ns). Regardless of ECMO therapy half of the study population deceased within 30 days after hospital admission. Despite being younger and with less comorbidities ECMO therapy did not improve survival in severely ill COVID-19 patients. Undulating CRP levels, a massive increase of bilirubin level and a high use of cytokine-adsorption were associated with worse outcomes. In conclusion, ECMO support might be helpful in selected severe cases of COVID-19.

A contemporary analysis of the volume-outcome relationship for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the United States

BACKGROUND

A paradoxical increase in mortality following extracorporeal membrane oxygenation at high-volume centers has previously been demonstrated. We examined the association between annual hospital volume and outcomes within a contemporary, national cohort of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients.

METHODS

All adults requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for postcardiotomy syndrome, cardiogenic shock, respiratory failure, or mixed cardiopulmonary failure were identified in the 2016 to 2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Patients undergoing heart and/or lung transplantation were excluded. A multivariable logistic regression with hospital extracorporeal membrane oxygenation volume parametrized as restricted cubic splines was developed to characterize the risk-adjusted association between volume and mortality. The volume corresponding to the maximum of the spline (43 cases/year) was used to categorize centers as low- or high-volume.

RESULTS

An estimated 26,377 patients met the study criteria, and 48.7% were managed at high-volume hospitals. Patients at low- and high-volume hospitals had similar age, sex, and rates of elective admission. Notably, patients at high-volume hospitals less frequently required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for postcardiotomy syndrome but more commonly for respiratory failure. After risk adjustment, high-volume hospital status was associated with reduced odds of in-hospital mortality, relative to low-volume hospitals (adjusted odds ratio 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.78-0.97). Interestingly, patients at high-volume hospitals faced a 5.2-day increment in length of stay (95% confidence interval 3.8-6.5) and $23,500 in attributable costs (95% confidence interval 8,300-38,700).

CONCLUSION

The present study found that greater extracorporeal membrane oxygenation volume was associated with decreased mortality but higher resource use. Our findings may help inform policies regarding access to and centralization of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation care in the United States.

The impact of obesity on the outcome of severe SARS-CoV-2 ARDS in a high volume ECMO centre: ECMO and corticosteroids support the obesity paradox

PURPOSE

The aim was to verify the impact of obesity on the long-term outcome of patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 ARDS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The retrospective study included patients admitted to the high-volume ECMO centre between March 2020 and March 2022. The impact of body mass index (BMI), co-morbidities and therapeutic measures on the short and 90-day outcomes was analysed.

RESULTS

292 patients were included, of whom 119(40.8%) were treated with veno-venous ECMO cannulated mostly (73%) in a local hospital. 58.5% were obese (64.7% on ECMO), the ECMO was most frequent in BMI > 40(49%). The ICU mortality (36.8% for obese vs 33.9% for the non-obese, p = 0.58) was related to ECMO only for the non-obese (p = 0.04). The 90-day mortalities (48.5% obese vs 45.5% non-obese, p = 0.603) of the ECMO and non-ECMO patients were not significantly influenced by BMI (p = 0.47, p = 0.771, respectively). The obesity associated risk factors for adverse outcome were age <50 (RR 2.14) and history of chronic immunosuppressive therapy (RR 2.11, p = 0.009). The higher dosage of steroids (RR 0.57, p = 0.05) associated with a better outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The high incidence of obesity was not associated with worse short and long-term outcomes. ECMO in obese patients together with the use of steroids in the later stage of ARDS may improve survival.

Effect of Hospital Volume on Outcome of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support - Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

In modern critical care, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is crucial in the management of severe respiratory and cardiac failure. Nationwide studies of the relationship between hospital volume and outcomes of ECMO use are unavailable.Methods and Results: Using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database, we identified 11,734 adult patients who received ECMO support in 101 hospitals between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2017. Outcomes included in-hospital mortality, 1-year mortality, and ECMO-related complications. Cox proportional hazards model, locally estimated scatterplot smoothing, and restricted cubic spline regression were used to analyze the volume-outcome relationship. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 65.5%, and the 1-year mortality rate was 70.6% in this database. The 101 hospitals were divided into 4 groups based on annual volume. The in-hospital and 1-year mortality rates were significantly lower in the high-volume group (annual volume >40) than in the low-volume group (annual volume <10).

CONCLUSIONS

For critical care, high-volume hospitals have superior short-term and mid-term outcomes. To make the medical system equitable and reasonable, establishing a rapid and efficient nationwide referral system should be considered.

Annual hospital procedural volume and outcome in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for respiratory failure

BACKGROUND

The hospital mortality of patients suffering from pulmonary failure requiring venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) or extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO₂ R) is high. It is unclear whether outcome correlates with a hospital's annual procedural volume.

METHODS

Data on all V-V ECMO and ECCO₂ R cases treated from 2007 to 2019 was retrieved from the German Institute for Medical Documentation and Information. Comorbidities and outcomes were assessed by DRG, OPS, and ICD codes. The study population was divided into 5 groups depending on annual hospital V-V ECMO and ECCO₂ R volumes (<10 cases; 10-19 cases; 20-29 cases; 30-49 cases; ≥50 cases). Primary outcome was hospital mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 25,096 V-V ECMO and 3,607 ECCO₂ R cases were analyzed. V-V ECMO hospitals increased from 89 in 2007 to 214 in 2019. Hospitals handling <10 cases annually increased especially (64 in 2007 to 149 in 2019). V-V ECMO cases rose from 807 in 2007 to 2,597 in 2019. Over 50% were treated in hospitals handling ≥30 cases annually. Hospital mortality was independent of the annual hospital procedural volume (55.3%; 61.3%; 59.8%; 60.2%; 56.3%, respectively, p=0.287). We detected no differences when comparing hospitals handling <30 cases to those with ≥30 annually (p=0.659). The numbers of ECCO₂ R hospitals and cases has dropped since 2011 (287 in 2007 to 48 in 2019). No correlation between annual hospital procedural volume and hospital mortality was identified (p=0.914).

CONCLUSION

The number of hospitals treating patients requiring V-V ECMO and V-V ECMO cases rose from 2007 to 2019, while ECCO₂ R hospitals and their case numbers decreased. We detected no correlation between annual hospital V-V ECMO or ECCO₂ R volume and hospital mortality.

Antibiotics and ECMO in the Adult Population—Persistent Challenges and Practical Guides

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is an emerging treatment modality associated with a high frequency of antibiotic use. However, several covariables emerge during ECMO implementation, potentially jeopardizing the success of antimicrobial therapy. These variables include but are not limited to: the increased volume of distribution, altered clearance, and adsorption into circuit components, in addition to complex interactions of antibiotics in critical care illness. Furthermore, ECMO complicates the assessment of antibiotic effectiveness as fever, or other signs may not be easily detected, the immunogenicity of the circuit affects procalcitonin levels and other inflammatory markers while disrupting the immune system. We provided a review of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics during ECMO, emphasizing practical application and review of patient-, illness-, and ECMO hardware-related factors.

Respiratory indications for ECMO: focus on COVID-19

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasingly being used for patients with severe respiratory failure and has received particular attention during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Evidence from two key randomized controlled trials, a subsequent post hoc Bayesian analysis, and meta-analyses support the interpretation of a benefit of ECMO in combination with ultra-lung-protective ventilation for select patients with very severe forms of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). During the pandemic, new evidence has emerged helping to better define the role of ECMO for patients with COVID-19. Results from large cohorts suggest outcomes during the first wave of the pandemic were similar to those in non-COVID-19 cohorts. As the pandemic continued, mortality of patients supported with ECMO has increased. However, the precise reasons for this observation are unclear. Known risk factors for mortality in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients are higher patient age, concomitant extra-pulmonary organ failures or malignancies, prolonged mechanical ventilation before ECMO, less experienced treatment teams and lower ECMO caseloads in the treating center. ECMO is a high resource-dependent support option; therefore, it should be used judiciously, and its availability may need to be constrained when resources are scarce. More evidence from high-quality research is required to better define the role and limitations of ECMO in patients with severe COVID-19.