1
|
Mithany RH, Daniel N, Shahid MH, Aslam S, Abdelmaseeh M, Gerges F, Gill MU, Abdallah SB, Hannan A, Saeed MT, Manasseh M, Mohamed MS. Revolutionizing Surgical Care: The Power of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS). Cureus 2023; 15:e48795. [PMID: 38024087 PMCID: PMC10646429 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.48795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The development of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) has brought about substantial transformations in perioperative care, substituting conventional methods with a patient-centric, evidence-based strategy. ERAS protocol adopts a holistic approach to patient care, which includes all stages preceding, during, and following the operation. These programs prioritize patient-specific therapies that are tailored to their specific requirements. Nutritional assessment and enhancement, patient education, minimally invasive procedures, and multimodal pain management are all fundamental components of ERAS. ERAS provides a multitude of advantages, including diminished postoperative complications, abbreviated hospital stays, heightened patient satisfaction, and healthcare cost reductions. This article examines the foundational tenets of ERAS, their incorporation into the field of general surgery, their suitability for diverse surgical specialties, the obstacles faced during implementation, and possible directions for further investigation, such as the integration of digital health technologies, personalized patient care, and the long-term viability of ERAS protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reda H Mithany
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Kingston Hospital National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Kingston Upon Thames, GBR
| | - Nesma Daniel
- Medical Laboratory Science, Ain Shams University, Cairo, EGY
| | | | - Samana Aslam
- General Surgery, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, PAK
| | - Mark Abdelmaseeh
- General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Assuit University, Assuit, EGY
| | - Farid Gerges
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Kingston Hospital National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, London, GBR
| | - Muhammad Umar Gill
- Accident and Emergency, Kings College Hospital National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, London, GBR
| | | | - Abdul Hannan
- Surgery, Glangwili General Hospital, Carmarthen, GBR
| | | | - Mina Manasseh
- General Surgery, Torbay and South Devon National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Torquay, GBR
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Marano L, Marmorino F, Desideri I, Carbone L, Rizzo A, Salvestrini V, Roviello F, Cinieri S, Donato V, De Luca R. Clinical nutrition in surgical oncology: Young AIOM-AIRO-SICO multidisciplinary national survey on behalf of NutriOnc research group. Front Nutr 2023; 10:1045022. [PMID: 37125048 PMCID: PMC10140427 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1045022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Malnutrition is a common condition in cancer patients which is usually associated with functional limitations, as well as increased morbidity and mortality. Based on the support of the young sections of Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM), Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) and Italian Society of Surgical Oncology (SICO) merged into the NutriOnc Research Group, we performed a multidisciplinary national survey with the aim to define the awareness of nutritional issues among healthcare professionals delivering anticancer care. The questionnaire was organized in four sections, as follows: Knowledge and practices regarding Nutritional Management of cancer patients; Timing of screening and assessment of Nutritional Status; Nutritional Treatment and prescription criteria; Immunonutrition and educational topics. The modules focused on esophagogastric, hepato-bilio-pancreatic and colorectal malignancies. Overall, 215 physicians completed the survey. As regards the management of Nutritional Status of cancer patients, many responders adopted the ERAS program (49.3%), while a consistent number of professionals did not follow a specific validated nutritional care protocol (41.8%), mainly due to lack of educational courses (14.5%) and financial support (15.3%). Nearly all the included institutions had a multidisciplinary team (92%) to finalize the treatment decision-making. Cancer patients routinely underwent nutritional screening according to 57.2% of interviewed physicians. The timing of nutritional assessment was at diagnosis (37.8%), before surgery (25.9%), after surgery (16.7%), before radiochemotherapy (13.5%) and after radiochemotherapy (7%). Most of the responders reported that nutritional status was assessed throughout the duration of cancer treatments (55.6%). An important gap between current delivery and need of nutritional assessment persists. The development of specific and defined care protocols and the adherence to these tools may be the key to improving nutritional support management in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Marano
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Federica Marmorino
- Unit of Oncology, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Isacco Desideri
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences “Mario Serio”, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Ludovico Carbone
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
- *Correspondence: Ludovico Carbone,
| | - Alessandro Rizzo
- Don Tonino Bello Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Viola Salvestrini
- CyberKnife Center, Istituto Fiorentino di Cura ed Assistenza, Florence, Italy
| | - Franco Roviello
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Saverio Cinieri
- Medical Oncology Division and Breast Unit, Antonio Perrino Hospital, Brindisi, Italy
| | - Vittorio Donato
- Department of Image Diagnostics, Ospedale San Camillo Forlanini, Rome, Italy
| | - Raffaele De Luca
- Department of Surgical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, Bari, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Matsugu Y, Ito K, Oshita A, Nobuhara H, Tanaka J, Akita T, Itamoto T. Postoperative oral energy and protein intakes for an enhanced recovery after surgery program incorporating early enteral nutrition for pancreaticoduodenectomy: A retrospective study. Nutr Clin Pract 2021; 37:654-665. [PMID: 34672385 DOI: 10.1002/ncp.10791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although postoperative early oral feeding in the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program for pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is deemed safe, the assessment of oral intakes has been insufficient. This study aimed to investigate postoperative oral intakes and the effectiveness of an ERAS program incorporating early enteral nutrition (EN). METHODS In total, 203 patients with PD were enrolled retrospectively. The first group (group E1; n = 61) comprised 11 ERAS care elements, whereas the second group (group E2; n = 106) comprised 19 elements. The control group (group C; n = 36) was managed using traditional care before ERAS was implemented. Postoperative energy and protein requirements were estimated at 25-30 kcal per kilogram of ideal body weight and 1.2-1.5 g per kilogram of ideal body weight, respectively, and were investigated along with the length of hospital stay (LOS). RESULTS The oral energy and protein intakes from the diets in the ERAS groups at postoperative day 7 significantly increased compared with those in group C. Intakes in groups E1 and E2 were not significantly different and provided <30% of the requirements. However, the total intakes, which were compensated by EN, were maintained at >80% of the requirements. LOS was significantly shorter in groups E1 (31 days) and E2 (19 days) than in group C (52 days). CONCLUSIONS Postoperative early oral energy and protein intakes of this modified ERAS program failed to meet the dietary requirements. However, early EN compensated for the shortages and contributed to the reduction of LOS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasuhiro Matsugu
- Department of Clinical Nutrition, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.,Department of Gastroenterological, Breast and Transplant Surgery, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Keiko Ito
- Department of Clinical Nutrition, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Akihiko Oshita
- Department of Gastroenterological, Breast and Transplant Surgery, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Nobuhara
- Department of Dentistry, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Junko Tanaka
- Department of Epidemiology, Infectious Disease Control and Prevention, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Tomoyuki Akita
- Department of Epidemiology, Infectious Disease Control and Prevention, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Itamoto
- Department of Gastroenterological, Breast and Transplant Surgery, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dräger DL. [Perioperative nutritional interventions in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer]. Urologe A 2021; 60:1458-1460. [PMID: 34605931 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-021-01670-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/13/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Désirée L Dräger
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Ernst-Heydemann-Straße 6, 18057, Rostock, Deutschland. .,UroEvidence der DGU@Deutsche Gesellschaft für Urologie e. V., Berlin, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wobith M, Wehle L, Haberzettl D, Acikgöz A, Weimann A. Needle Catheter Jejunostomy in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Upper Gastrointestinal and Pancreato-Biliary Cancer-Impact on Nutritional and Clinical Outcome in the Early and Late Postoperative Period. Nutrients 2020; 12:E2564. [PMID: 32854177 PMCID: PMC7551703 DOI: 10.3390/nu12092564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Revised: 08/18/2020] [Accepted: 08/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
The metabolic risk for patients undergoing abdominal cancer resection increases in the perioperative period and malnutrition may be observed. In order to prevent further weight loss, the guidelines recommend for high-risk patients the placement of a needle catheter jejunostomy (NCJ) for supplementing enteral feeding in the early and late postoperative period. Our aim was to evaluate the safety of NCJ placement and its potential benefits regarding the nutritional status in the postoperative course. We retrospectively analyzed patients undergoing surgery for upper gastrointestinal cancer, such as esophageal, gastric, and pancreato-biliary cancer, and NCJ placement during the operation. The nutritional parameters body mass index (BMI), perioperative weight loss, phase angle measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and the clinical outcome were assessed perioperatively and during follow-up visits 1 to 3 months and 4 to 6 months after surgery. In 102 patients a NCJ was placed between January 2006 and December 2016. Follow-up visits 1 to 3 months and 4 to 6 months after surgery were performed in 90 patients and 88 patients, respectively. No severe complications were seen after the NCJ placement. The supplementing enteral nutrition via NCJ did not improve the nutritional status of the patients postoperatively. There was a significant postoperative decline of weight and phase angle, especially in the first to third month after surgery, which could be stabilized until 4-6 months after surgery. Placement of NCJ is safe. In patients with upper gastrointestinal and pancreato-biliary cancer, supplementing enteral nutrition during the postoperative course and continued after discharge may attenuate unavoidable weight loss and a reduction of body cell mass within the first six months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Arved Weimann
- Clinical Nutrition Unit of the Department of General, Visceral, and Oncological Surgery, Klinikum St. Georg gGmbH Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (M.W.); (L.W.); (D.H.); (A.A.)
| |
Collapse
|