A Multiple Biomarker Approach in Patients with Cardiac Sarcoidosis

Biomarkers and molecular endotypes of sarcoidosis: lessons from omics and non-omics studies

Sarcoidosis is a chronic granulomatous disorder characterized by unknown etiology, undetermined mechanisms, and non-specific therapies except TNF blockade. To improve our understanding of the pathogenicity and to predict the outcomes of the disease, the identification of new biomarkers and molecular endotypes is sorely needed. In this study, we systematically evaluate the biomarkers identified through Omics and non-Omics approaches in sarcoidosis. Most of the currently documented biomarkers for sarcoidosis are mainly identified through conventional "one-for-all" non-Omics targeted studies. Although the application of machine learning algorithms to identify biomarkers and endotypes from unbiased comprehensive Omics studies is still in its infancy, a series of biomarkers, overwhelmingly for diagnosis to differentiate sarcoidosis from healthy controls have been reported. In view of the fact that current biomarker profiles in sarcoidosis are scarce, fragmented and mostly not validated, there is an urgent need to identify novel sarcoidosis biomarkers and molecular endotypes using more advanced Omics approaches to facilitate disease diagnosis and prognosis, resolve disease heterogeneity, and facilitate personalized medicine.

Sarcoid heart disease and imaging

Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) can mimic any cardiomyopathy due to its ability to manifest with a variety of clinical presentations. The exact prevalence of CS remains unknown but has been reported ranging from 2.3% to as high as 29.9% among patients presenting with new onset cardiomyopathy and/or atrioventricular block. Early and accurate diagnosis of CS is often challenging due to the nature of disease progression and lack of diagnostic reference standard. The current diagnostic criteria for CS are lacking in sensitivity and specificity. Here, we review the contemporary role of advanced imaging modalities such as cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging in diagnosing and prognosticating patients with CS.

High-sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Is a Useful Biomarker for Predicting the Prognosis of Patients with Systemic Sarcoidosis Regardless of Cardiac Involvement

Objective Cardiac involvement defines the prognosis for patients with systemic sarcoidosis. Despite advancements in techniques for diagnosing cardiac lesions, there remains significant room for improvement in cardiac screening and prognostic prediction. The present study therefore assessed the prognostic factors associated with cardiovascular events in patients with sarcoidosis. Methods We retrospectively studied 132 patients with systemic sarcoidosis and evaluated the clinical data obtained between 2009 and 2022. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the associations between cardiovascular events and prognostic factors. Results The median age of the patients at the diagnosis was 64.0 (55.0-71.0) years old. During a mean follow-up period of 6.3±3.2 years, 28 patients suffered from cardiovascular events. Patients in the event group had more severe heart failure symptoms, more frequent ventricular tachycardia, higher serum high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) values [0.025 (0.017-0.044) vs. 0.011 (0.007-0.019) ng/mL, p<0.001], and lower left ventricular ejection fraction values than those in the non-event group. These trends were observed even if the patients were not diagnosed with cardiac involvement at the time of enrollment. A multivariate analysis revealed that hs-cTnT was an independent biomarker for the prediction of cardiac events (hs-cTnT >0.014 ng/mL: HR: 7.31, 95% confidence interval: 2.20 to 24.28, p<0.001). Conclusion Hs-cTnT is a useful biomarker for predicting cardiovascular events in patients with sarcoidosis, even if cardiac involvement is not detected at the initial evaluation.

Re-evaluating serum angiotensin-converting enzyme in sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is a systemic inflammatory disease of unknown etiology, which mainly affects the lungs and lymph nodes, as well as extrapulmonary organs. Its incidence, and prevalence rate, and disease course largely vary with regions and populations globally. The clinical manifestations of sarcoidosis depend on the affected organs and the degree of severity, and the diagnosis is mainly based on serum biomarkers, radiographic, magnetic resonance, or positron emission tomography imaging, and pathological biopsy. Noncaseating granulomas composing T cells, macrophages, epithelioid cells, and giant cells, were observed in a pathological biopsy, which was the characteristic pathological manifestation of sarcoidosis. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) was first found in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Its main function is to convert angiotensin I (Ang I) into Ang II, which plays an important role in regulating blood pressure. Also, an ACE insertion/deletion polymorphism exists in the human genome, which is involved in the occurrence and development of many diseases, including hypertension, heart failure, and sarcoidosis. The serum ACE level, most commonly used as a biomarker in diagnosing sarcoidosis, in patients with sarcoidosis increases. because of epithelioid cells and giant cells of sarcoid granuloma expressing ACE. Thus, it serves as the most commonly used biomarker in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis and also aids in analyzing its therapeutic effect and prognosis in patients with sarcoidosis.

Update on cardiac sarcoidosis

Cardiac sarcoidosis is an inflammatory myocardial disease of unknown etiology. It is characterized by the deposition of non-caseating granulomas that may involve any part of the heart. Cardiac sarcoidosis is often under-diagnosed or recognized partly due to the heterogeneous clinical presentation of the disease. The three most frequent clinical manifestations of cardiac sarcoidosis are atrioventricular block, ventricular arrhythmias, and heart failure. A definitive diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis can be made with histology findings from an endomyocardial biopsy. However, the diagnosis in the majority of cases is based on findings from the clinical presentation and advanced imaging due to the low sensitivity of endomyocardial biopsy. The Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) 2014 expert consensus statement and the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare criteria are the two most commonly used diagnostic criteria sets. This review article summarizes the available evidence on cardiac sarcoidosis, focusing on the diagnostic criteria and stepwise approach to its management.

Sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis has a multitude of manifestations and affects the human body widely. Pulmonary complaints are most common; however, cardiac, optic, and neurologic manifestations carry high mortality and morbidity. Acute presentations in the emergency room can cause life-altering effects if not appropriately diagnosed and treated. Generally, less severe cases of sarcoidosis have a favorable prognosis and can be treated with steroid therapy. Resistant and more severe cases of the disease carry high mortality and morbidity. It is incredibly important to arrange specialty follow-up for these patients when needed. This review focuses on the acute presentations of sarcoidosis.

Sarcoid Heart Disease: Review of Current Knowledge

Sarcoidosis is a granulomatous disease with the potential of multiple organ system involvement and its etiology remains unknown. Cardiac involvement is associated with worse clinical outcome, and has been reported to be 20-30% in white and as high as 58% in Japanese populations with sarcoidosis. Clinical manifestations of cardiac sarcoidosis highly depend on the extent and location of granulomatous inflammation. The most frequent presentations include heart block, tachyarrhythmia, or heart failure. Endomyocardial biopsy is the most specific diagnostic test, but has poor sensitivity due to often patchy involvement. The diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis remains challenging due to nonspecific imaging findings. Both 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging can be used to evaluate cardiac sarcoidosis, but evaluate different stages of the disease process. FDG-PET detects metabolically active inflammatory cells while cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with late gadolinium enhancement reveals areas of myocardial necrosis and fibrosis. Aggressive therapy of symptomatic cardiac sarcoidosis is often sought due to the high risk of sudden death and/or progression to heart failure. Prednisone 20-40 mg a day is the recommended initial treatment. In refractory or severe cases, higher doses of prednisone, 1-1.5 mg/kg/d (or its equivalent) and addition of a steroid-sparing agent have been utilized. Methotrexate is added most commonly. Long-term improvement has been reported with the use of a combination of weekly methotrexate and prednisone versus prednisone alone. After initiation of treatment, a cardiac FDG-PET scan may be performed 2-3 months later to assess treatment response.

The Prognostic Value of B-Type Natriuretic Peptide in Patients With Cardiac Sarcoidosis Without Heart Failure: Insights From ILLUMINATE-CS

Background The prognostic role of BNP (B-type natriuretic peptide) in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis without evident heart failure is unknown. Methods and Results This is a post hoc analysis of ILLUMINATE-CS (Illustration of the Management and Prognosis of Japanese Patients With Cardiac Sarcoidosis), a multicenter, retrospective, and observational study that evaluated the clinical characteristics and prognosis of cardiac sarcoidosis. We analyzed patients with cardiac sarcoidosis without evident heart failure at the time of diagnosis. The association between baseline BNP levels and prognosis was investigated. The primary end point was the combined end point of all-cause death, heart failure hospitalization, and fatal ventricular arrhythmia. In total, 238 patients (61.0±11.1 years, 37% men) were analyzed, and 61 primary end points were observed during a median follow-up period of 3.0 (interquartile range, 1.7-5.8) years. Patients with high BNP (BNP above the median value of BNP) were older and had a lower renal function and left ventricular ejection fraction than those with low BNP values. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis indicated that high BNP levels were significantly associated with a high incidence of primary end points (log-rank P=0.004), and this association was retained even in multivariable Cox regression (hazard ratio, 2.06 [95% CI, 1.19-3.55]; P=0.010). Log-transformed BNP as a continuous variable was associated with the primary end point (hazard ratio, 2.12 [95% CI, 1.31-3.43]; P=0.002). Conclusions High baseline BNP level was an independent predictor of future adverse events in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis without heart failure at the time of diagnosis. Registration URL: https://www.umin.ac.jp/english/; Unique Identifier: UMIN-CTR: UMIN000034974.

Localization of Late Gadolinium Enhancement and Its Association with Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients with Cardiac Sarcoidosis

Sustained ventricular tachycardia (sVT), leading to sudden cardiac death, is one of the common manifestations in cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). Although late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has been reported to be associated with sVT, the relationships of its localization to sVT have not been fully evaluated.To evaluate the localization of LGE and its relationships to sVT in patients with CS, we reviewed medical record of consecutive 31 patients with CS who underwent CMR. The localization of LGE was divided into four categories: Left ventricular (LV) septum, LV free wall, right ventricular (RV) septum, and RV free wall. We investigated the association of sVT with localization of LGE and other parameters including serum biomarkers LV ejection fraction on echocardiography and Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) accumulation on positron emission tomography (PET) -CT.Of the studied population, 8 patients (25.8%) were known to present with sVT among 31 CS patients. LGE was observed in the RV free wall in 6 patients with sVT, whereas it was in 5 patients without sVT (75.0% versus 21.7%, P = 0.022). Univariate analysis showed that only LGE in the RV free wall was associated with sVT (odds ratio [OR]: 10.80; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.64-70.93, P = 0.013).LGE in the RV free wall was associated with sVT in patients with CS.

A Comprehensive Review of Sarcoidosis Diagnosis and Monitoring for the Pulmonologist

Sarcoidosis is a systemic granulomatous disease with heterogenous clinical manifestations. Here we review the diagnosis of sarcoidosis and propose a clinically feasible diagnostic work-up and monitoring protocol. As sarcoidosis is a systemic disease, a multidisciplinary approach is recommended for best outcomes. However, since the lungs are frequently involved, the pulmonologist is often the referral physician for diagnosis and management. When sarcoidosis is suspected, diagnosis needs to be confirmed and organ involvement/impairment assessed. This process is also required to establish whether the patient is likely to benefit from treatment, as many cases of sarcoidosis are self-limited and remit spontaneously. Whether or not treatment is started, effective regular follow-up is necessary to monitor changes in the disease, including extension, progression, remissions, flare-ups, and complications.

Sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis has a multitude of manifestations and affects the human body widely. Pulmonary complaints are most common; however, cardiac, optic, and neurologic manifestations carry high mortality and morbidity. Acute presentations in the emergency room can cause life-altering effects if not appropriately diagnosed and treated. Generally, less severe cases of sarcoidosis have a favorable prognosis and can be treated with steroid therapy. Resistant and more severe cases of the disease carry high mortality and morbidity. It is incredibly important to arrange specialty follow-up for these patients when needed. This review focuses on the acute presentations of sarcoidosis.

Cardiac sarcoidosis: from diagnosis to treatment

Sarcoidosis is a systemic granulomatous disease of unknown cause. Its clinical presentations are heterogeneous and virtually any organ system can be affected, most commonly lungs. The manifestations of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) are heterogenous depending on the extent and location of the disease and range from asymptomatic forms to life-threatening arrhythmias as well as to progressive heart failure. Cardiac involvement is associated with a worse prognosis. The diagnosis of CS is often challenging and requires a multimodality approach based on current international recommendations. Pharmacological treatment of CS is based on administration of anti-inflammatory therapy (mainly corticosteroids), which is often combined with heart failure medication and/or antiarrhythmics. Nonpharmacological therapeutic approaches in CS cover pacemaker or defibrillator implantation, catheter ablations and heart transplantation. This review aims to summarize the current understanding of CS including its epidemiology, etiopathogenesis, clinical presentations, diagnostic approaches, and therapeutic possibilities.

Strain Echocardiography Is a Promising Tool for the Prognostic Assessment of Sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is a systemic chronic granulomatous disease with significant morbidity and mortality. Although basic transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is not recommended for the assessment of sarcoidosis, speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) has emerged as more sensitive for the early detection of cardiac sarcoidosis and its outcome. The aim of the study was to assess the utility of left atrial and left ventricular longitudinal STE for the prediction of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and sarcoidosis relapses. We enrolled 172 consecutive patients with sarcoidosis who underwent TTE and pulmonary function tests (PFTs). All patients were followed for a sarcoidosis relapse and MACE. During a median follow-up of 2217 days, 8 deaths, 23 MACE and 36 sarcoidosis relapses were observed. LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) was significantly lower in patients with MACE (p = 0.025). LV-GLS < 17.13% (absolute value) was identified as a fair predictor of MACE. Concerning the sarcoidosis control, TTE revealed a reduction of the LV ejection fraction (p = 0.0432), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (p = 0.0272) and global peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS, p = 0.0012) in patients with relapses. PALS < 28.5% was the best predictor of a sarcoidosis relapse. Our results highlight a potential role of LV-GLS and PALS as prognostic markers in sarcoidosis, supporting the use of STE in the clinical management of these patients.

Cytokine Signaling and Matrix Remodeling Pathways Associated with Cardiac Sarcoidosis Disease Activity Defined Using FDG PET Imaging

While cardiac imaging has improved the diagnosis and risk assessment for cardiac sarcoidosis (CS), treatment regimens have consisted of generalized heart failure therapies and non-specific anti-inflammatory regimens. The overall goal of this study was to perform high-sensitivity plasma profiling of specific inflammatory pathways in patients with sarcoidosis and with CS.Specific inflammatory/proteolytic cascades were upregulated in sarcoidosis patients, and certain profiles emerged for CS patients.Plasma samples were collected from patients with biopsy-confirmed sarcoidosis undergoing F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (n = 47) and compared to those of referent control subjects (n = 6). Using a high-sensitivity, automated multiplex array, cytokines, soluble cytokine receptor profiles (an index of cytokine activation), as well as matrix metalloproteinase (MMP), and endogenous MMP inhibitors (TIMPs) were examined.The plasma tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and soluble TNF receptors sCD30 and sTNFRI were increased using sarcoidosis, and sTNFRII increased in CS patients (n = 18). The soluble interleukin sIL-2R and vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (sVEGFR2 and sVEGFR3) increased to the greatest degree in CS patients. When computed as a function of referent control values, the majority of soluble cytokine receptors increased in both sarcoidosis and CS groups. Plasma MMP-9 levels increased in sarcoidosis but not in the CS subset. Plasma TIMP levels declined in both groups.The findings from this study were the identification of increased activation of a cluster of soluble cytokine receptors, which augment not only inflammatory cell maturation but also transmigration in patients with sarcoidosis and patients with cardiac involvement.

Inflammatory Cardiomyopathy: Case-based Review on Clinical Presentation, Diagnosis, and Management

Inflammatory cardiomyopathy is a broad term encompassing any disease leading to myocardial inflammation with associated cardiac dysfunction. While endomyocardial biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosis, noninvasive imaging techniques, such as cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography, have become powerful tools to facilitate the identification of underlying myocardial inflammation. This review presents a series of clinical cases with some common etiologies of inflammatory cardiomyopathy, including diagnosis and management.

Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Clinical Overview

Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) with clinical manifestation occurs in about 5-8% of patients with sarcoidosis. CS may be clinically suspected by the presence of ventricular arrhythmia, conduction abnormalities, and heart failure (HF). However, 20%-25% of patients may present with silent CS, having asymptomatic cardiac involvement. The diagnosis of CS is based on findings from nuclear studies, cardiac magnetic resonance, and extra-cardiac tissue biopsy. Due to the inflammatory nature of the disease, immunosuppressive medications are a cornerstone of therapy. The treatment also includes recommended HF medical therapies. Since CS patients are at risk of sudden cardiac death resulting from progression of cardiac dysfunction or the presence of scar originating from fatal arrhythmias, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators should be considered, with special indication beyond accepted recommendations in HF. In CS, the extent of left ventricular dysfunction is the most important mortality predictor. Heart transplant or mechanical circulatory support may represent life saving strategies in selective CS patients.

Predicting risk of sudden cardiac death in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis using multimodality imaging and personalized heart modeling in a multivariable classifier

Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS), an inflammatory disease characterized by formation of granulomas in the heart, is associated with high risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) from ventricular arrhythmias. Current "one-size-fits-all" guidelines for SCD risk assessment in CS result in insufficient appropriate primary prevention. Here, we present a two-step precision risk prediction technology for patients with CS. First, a patient's arrhythmogenic propensity arising from heterogeneous CS-induced ventricular remodeling is assessed using a novel personalized magnetic-resonance imaging and positron-emission tomography fusion mechanistic model. The resulting simulations of arrhythmogenesis are fed, together with a set of imaging and clinical biomarkers, into a supervised classifier. In a retrospective study of 45 patients, the technology achieved testing results of 60% sensitivity [95% confidence interval (CI): 57-63%], 72% specificity [95% CI: 70-74%], and 0.754 area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [95% CI: 0.710-0.797]. It outperformed clinical metrics, highlighting its potential to transform CS risk stratification.

Effect of Corticosteroid Therapy in Patients With Cardiac Sarcoidosis on Frequency of Venous Thromboembolism

Sarcoidosis is a multisystem inflammatory condition with occasional cardiac involvement (CS), which may be associated with risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). As data on VTE in CS are sparse and corticosteroid therapy has not been previously examined, we aim to determine the association between CS, corticosteroid treatment for CS, and VTE. Patients referred to our institution with concern for sarcoidosis and underwent a positron emission tomography (PET) scan were retrospectively assessed. Chi-squared and multivariate regression analyses were conducted to determine the association between a diagnosis of sarcoidosis, CS, corticosteroid use, and VTE events. Six hundred and forty nine patients were split into 3 categories: 235 with no sarcoidosis (NS), 91 with extra-cardiac sarcoidosis only (ECS), and 323 with CS (isolated CS and/or CS with extra cardiac sarcoid). Thirty nine CS, 7 ECS, and 9 NS patients developed PE while 44 CS, 3 ECS, and 18 NS patients developed DVT. On multivariate regression, neither CS nor ECS was an independent risk factor for VTE (p >0.05) but corticosteroid use was independently associated with VTE (HR 3.06, p = 0.007 for PE, HR 6.21, p <0.0001 for DVT). On logistic regression analysis, corticosteroid dose was found to be independently associated with both PE (p = 0.001) and DVT (p = 0.007). Optimal threshold for defining VTE risk with corticosteroid therapy was a prednisone-equivalent dose of 17.5 mg. In conclusion, contrary to previous studies, this current study found that neither sarcoidosis nor CS is an independent risk factor for VTE. Rather, corticosteroid therapy was associated with an increased risk of VTE.

Cardiac Sarcoidosis: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management

Sarcoidosis is a chronic multi-system disorder with an unknown etiology that can affect the cardiac tissue, resulting in Cardiac Sarcoidosis (CS). The majority of these CS cases are clinically silent, and when there are symptoms, the symptoms are vague and can have a lot in common with other common cardiac diseases. These symptoms can range from arrhythmias to heart failure. If CS goes undetected, it can lead to detrimental outcomes for patients. Diagnosis depends on timely utilization of imaging modalities and non-invasive testing, while in some cases, it does necessitate biopsy. Early diagnosis and treatment with immunosuppressive agents are crucial, and it is essential that follow-up testing be performed to ensure resolution and remission. This manuscript provides an in-depth review of CS and the current literature regarding CS diagnosis and treatment.

Challenges in Cardiac and Pulmonary Sarcoidosis: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

Sarcoidosis is a complex disease with heterogeneous clinical presentations that can affect virtually any organ. Although the lung is typically the most common organ involved, combined pulmonary and cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) account for most of the morbidity and mortality associated with this disease. Pulmonary sarcoidosis can be asymptomatic or result in impairment in quality of life and end-stage, severe, and/or life-threatening disease. The latter outcome is seen almost exclusively in those with fibrotic pulmonary sarcoidosis, which accounts for 10% to 20% of pulmonary sarcoidosis patients. CS is problematic to diagnose and may cause significant morbidity and death from heart failure or ventricular arrhythmias. The diagnosis of CS usually requires surrogate cardiac imaging biomarkers, as endomyocardial biopsy has relatively low yield, even with directed electrophysiological mapping. Treatment of CS is often multifactorial, involving a combination of antigranulomatous therapy and pharmacotherapy for cardiac arrhythmias and/or heart failure in addition to device placement and cardiac transplantation.

Potential use of biomarkers for the clinical evaluation of sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is a systemic granulomatous disease of unknown etiology and pathogenesis with a heterogeneous clinical presentation. In the appropriate clinical and radiological context and with the exclusion of other diagnoses, the disease is characterized by the pathological presence of non-caseating epithelioid cell granulomas. Sarcoidosis is postulated to be a multifactorial disease caused by chronic antigenic stimulation. The immunopathogenesis of sarcoidosis encompasses a complex interaction between the host, genetic factors and postulated environmental and infectious triggers, which result in granuloma development.The exact pathogenesis of the disease has yet to be elucidated, but some of the inflammatory pathways that play a key role in disease progression and outcomes are becoming apparent, and these may form the logical basis for selecting potential biomarkers.Biomarkers are biological molecules that are altered pathologically. To date, there exists no single reliable biomarker for the evaluation of sarcoidosis, either diagnostically or prognostically but new candidates are emerging. A diagnosis of sarcoidosis ideally requires a biopsy confirming non-caseating granulomas, but the likelihood of progression that requires intervention remains unpredictable. These challenging aspects could be potentially resolved by incorporating biomarkers into clinical practice for both diagnosis and monitoring disease activity.This review outlines the current knowledge on sarcoidosis with an emphasis on pulmonary sarcoidosis, and delineates the understanding surrounding the implication of biomarkers for the clinical evaluation of sarcoidosis.

Arrhythmias Associated with Inflammatory Cardiomyopathies

Purpose of review

To provide an approach to the diagnosis and treatment of arrhythmias associated with inflammatory cardiomyopathies.

Recent findings

Inflammatory cardiomyopathies are increasingly recognized as the etiology of both ventricular and supraventricular arrhythmias. There have been recent studies providing novel insights into the pathogenesis of arrhythmias in inflammatory cardiomyopathies and exploring the role of various diagnostic tools and treatment strategies.

Summary

Patients with inflammatory cardiomyopathies often present with one or more arrhythmias, including atrioventricular block, atrial and ventricular tachyarrhythmias, and occasionally sudden cardiac death. Given dynamic pathophysiology and heterogeneous presentation, the management of arrhythmias in these patients presents unique challenges. We review the current approach to the diagnosis and treatment of arrhythmias in this challenging cohort of patients with an emphasis on cardiac sarcoidosis.

Supplementary Information

The online version of this article (10.1007/s11936-020-00871-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Update in Cardiac Sarcoidosis

Increasing awareness of cardiac manifestations of sarcoidosis and the widespread availability of advanced imaging tests have led to a tidal wave of interest in a condition that was once considered rare. In this Focused Review, we explore important clinical questions that may confront specialists faced with possible cardiac involvement. In the absence of an ideal reference standard, three main sets of clinical criteria exist: the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare, the Heart Rhythm Society, and the World Association for Sarcoidosis and Other Granulomatous Disorders criteria. Once cardiac sarcoidosis is suspected, clinicians should be familiar with the prevalence of the disease in different clinical scenarios. Before obtaining advanced cardiac imaging, electrocardiogram, ambulatory electrocardiogram, echocardiogram, and B-type natriuretic peptide may be useful. The available therapies for cardiac sarcoidosis include immunosuppression, antiarrhythmic medications, heart failure medications, device therapy, ablation therapy, and heart transplantation. Contemporary data suggest that long-term survival in cardiac sarcoidosis is better than previously believed. There is no randomized controlled trial demonstrating benefits of screening, but screening is recommended based on observational data.

A Patient with Cardiac Sarcoidosis in Whom an Abnormal Myocardial Uptake of Fluorine-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose and Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia Recurred 3.5 Years after Discontinuing Oral Corticosteroid Therapy

We herein report a woman diagnosed with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) based on the presence of epithelioid granulomas in non-cardiac organs and clinical findings including sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) and cardiac dysfunction. She stopped oral corticosteroid after 4 years of treatment, and an abnormal myocardial uptake of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose and sustained VT recurred 3.5 years later. There is no consensus concerning whether or not corticosteroid therapy should be discontinued in the treatment of CS. As a relapse of sarcoidosis-related inflammation may be associated with life-threatening arrhythmia, some patients should continue corticosteroid therapy, even at low doses.

The ECG in sarcoidosis - a marker of cardiac involvement? Current evidence and clinical implications

Sarcoidosis is a multisystem granulomatous disease of unknown etiology characterized by noncaseating granulomas. Cardiac involvement is often limiting patients' prognosis. Cardiac sarcoidosis can manifest with variant cardiac arrhythmias, of which atrioventricular (AV)-block-related bradycardia and ventricular tachycardias are the most common. Although cardiac sarcoidosis remains a histopathological diagnosis, the significance of imaging modalities, especially cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is increasing rapidly but mainly remains reserved for patients with a high suspicion due to a previous arrhythmia or unknown cardiomyopathy. Thus, there is a need for screening in daily clinical practice so that possible characteristic electrocardiographic (ECG) findings may guide the way to detect the disease. We therefore evaluated the ECG as a potential tool for screening of cardiac sarcoidosis and present different electrophysiological manifestations of cardiac sarcoidosis based on a literature review. The ECG is a valuable tool for screening of cardiac involvement in patients with sarcoidosis. Several parameters have been shown to be associated with cardiac involvement in sarcoidosis such as higher-degree AV-block, QRS complex fragmentation and widening, as well as certain T wave abnormalities that may indicate cardiac involvement, of which the latter two are most promising and specific. However, prospective studies examining a large number of trials are desirable.

Cardiac Sarcoidosis

Approximately 5% of patients with sarcoidosis will have clinically manifest cardiac involvement presenting with one or more of ventricular arrhythmias, conduction abnormalities, and heart failure. It is estimated that another 20 to 25% of pulmonary/systemic sarcoidosis patients have asymptomatic cardiac involvement (clinically silent disease). Cardiac presentations can be the first (and/or an unrecognized) manifestation of sarcoidosis in a variety of circumstances. Immunosuppression therapy (usually with corticosteroids) has been suggested for the treatment of clinically manifest cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) despite minimal data supporting it. Positron emission tomography imaging is often used to detect active disease and guide immunosuppression. Patients with clinically manifest disease often need device therapy, typically with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). The extent of left ventricular dysfunction seems to be the most important predictor of prognosis among patients with clinically manifest CS. In the current era of earlier diagnosis, modern heart failure treatment, and use of ICD therapy, the prognosis from CS is much improved. In a recent Finnish nationwide study, 10-year cardiac survival was 92.5% in 102 patients.

Laboratory Tests for Neuropathies: What to do and to Avoid

OBJECTIVES

laboratory tests for work-up of hereditary and acquired neuropathies of peripheral nerves are frequently uncritically utilized. This overview focuses on the most common laboratory tests and investigations needed for diagnosing PNPs by the general neurologist.

METHOD

Literature search.

RESULTS

laboratory tests recommended for the work-up of hereditary and acquired neuropathies should be chosen according to the individual and family history, clinical presentation, and electrophysiological findings. Laboratory tests should be selected specifically according to the suspected type of neuropathy to avoid unnecessary tests and expenses. Work-up should include as few samples as necessary for uncovering the etiology and should consider the sensitivity/specificity of the tests applied.. Basic screening tests for neuropathies should include a blood cell count, thyroid, renal and liver function tests, blood glucose levels, HbA1c, vitamin-B12, and immunofixation. Other laboratory investigations should be carried out only if a specific phenotype is present or if unexpected changes of the disease course occur. In these cases referral to a neuromuscular center is recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

Laboratory tests are helpful for the diagnosis of acquired and hereditary neuropathies but these tests should be ordered according to the history, clinical presentation and findings on electrophysiological investigations. If basic laboratory parameters fail to uncover the etiology, patients should be referred to a center specialized in neuromuscular disorders.

Detection of arrhythmogenic substrate within QRS complex in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis using wavelet-transformed ECG

Signal-averaged electrocardiography (SAECG) has been known to be useful for prediction of lethal ventricular arrhythmias (VA). However, this technique has limitations in patients with intraventricular conduction disturbance (IVCD), which is common in cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). Meanwhile, wavelet-transformed ECG (WTECG) has been reported to be useful for detecting arrhythmogenic substrate hidden within QRS complex. The objective of this study was to assess the utility of WTECG for detecting arrhythmogenic substrate in patients with CS. Forty-four CS patients including 18 patients with VA were retrospectively investigated. The parameters on the signal-averaged electrocardiography (SAECG) and the power of frequency components on WTECG were compared between VA group and non-VA group. Eighteen patients have VA (VT: n = 17, VF: n = 1). LP were detected in 17 in VA group and 24 in non-VA group. WTECG showed that high-frequency components (HFC; 80-150 Hz) were developed in VA group. Peak power value at 150 Hz (P150) was significantly higher in VA group than that in non-VA group (442.9 ± 160.2 vs 316.7 ± 100.8, p = 0.006). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed an optimal cutoff point of 336 of P150 for detecting patients with VA, with 82.4% sensitivity, 61.5% specificity, and area under the curve of 0.74 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.89). WTECG may be useful for detecting CS patients who are prone to VA.

Natural Autoantibodies in Chronic Pulmonary Diseases

In autoantibody-mediated autoimmune diseases, pathogenic autoantibodies generated by a failure of central or peripheral tolerance, have different effects mediated by a variety of mechanisms. Interestingly, even non-autoimmune chronic diseases have a set of disease-specific natural autoantibodies that are maintained for a long time. Because most of these natural autoantibodies target intracellular proteins or long non-coding RNAs, they are speculated to be non-pathological and have some important as yet unrecognized physiological functions such as debris clearance. Recently, we revealed a set of disease-specific natural autoantibodies of chronic pulmonary diseases with unknown etiology by protein arrays that enable detection of specific autoantibodies against >8000 targets. Surprisingly, some of the targeted antigens of disease-specific autoantibodies were subsequently reported by other laboratories as strongly associated with the disease, suggesting that these antigens reflect the pathology of each disease. Furthermore, some of these autoantibodies that target extracellular antigens might modify the original course of each disease. Here, we review the disease-specific natural autoantibodies of chronic pulmonary diseases, including chronic fibrosing idiopathic interstitial pneumonias, sarcoidosis, and autoimmune pulmonary alveolar proteinosis, and discuss their utility and effects.

Cardiac Sarcoidosis multi-center randomized controlled trial (CHASM CS- RCT)

Approximately 5% of patients with sarcoidosis have clinically manifest cardiac involvement. Clinical features of Cardiac Sarcoidosis are dependent on the location, extent, and activity of the disease. First line therapy is usually with prednisone and this is recommended based on clinician experience, expert opinion and small observational cohorts. There are no published clinical trials in cardiac sarcoidosis and multiple experts in the field have called for randomized clinical trials to answer important patient care questions. Corticosteroid are associated with multiple adverse effects including hypertension, diabetes, weight gain, osteoporosis, and increased risk of infections. In contrast Methotrexate is generally well tolerated and is increasingly used in other forms of sarcoidosis.

OBJECTIVES

The Cardiac Sarcoidosis Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial (CHASM CS-RCT; NCT03593759) is a multicenter randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the optimal initial treatment strategy for patients with active cardiac sarcoidosis. We hypothesize that (1) a low dose prednisone/methotrexate combination will have non-inferior efficacy to standard dose prednisone and that (2) the low dose prednisone/ methotrexate combination will result in significantly better quality of life than standard dose prednisone, as a result of reduced burden of side effects.

METHODS/DESIGN

Eligible study subjects will have active clinically manifest cardiac sarcoidosis presenting with one or more of the following clinical findings: advanced conduction system disease, significant sinus node dysfunction, non-sustained or sustained ventricular arrhythmia, left ventricular dysfunction or right ventricular dysfunction. Subjects will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to prednisone 0.5 mg/kg/day for 6 months (maximum dose 30 mg daily) OR to prednisone 20 mg daily for 1 month, then 10 mg daily for 1 month, then 5 mg daily for one month then stop AND methotrexate 15-20 mg once weekly for 6 months. The primary endpoint is summed perfusion rest score on 6-month PET (blinded core-lab review). The summed perfusion rest score is measure of myocardial fibrosis/scar. The design is non-inferiority with a sample size of 97 per group.

DISCUSSION

Given the multiorgan system potential adverse side effects of prednisone, proving noninferiority of an alternate regimen would be sufficient to make the alternative compare favorably to standard dose steroids. This is the first ever clinical trial in cardiac sarcoidosis and thus in addition to the listed goals of the trial, we will also establish a multi-center, multinational cardiac sarcoidosis clinical trials network. Such a collaborative infrastructure will enable a new era of high quality data to guide physicians when treating cardiac sarcoidosis patients.

Cardiac Sarcoidosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this state-of-the-art review, we highlight our current understanding of diagnosis, assessment, and management of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS), focusing on recently published data and expert consensus statement guidelines.

RECENT FINDINGS

Academic interest in cardiac sarcoidosis research has increased over the past decade along with increased clinical awareness among clinicians. In 2014, the Heart Rhythm Society published the first expert consensus statement on diagnosing and managing arrhythmias associated with CS. Cardiac magnetic resonance has emerged as a valuable tool both for diagnosing CS and predicting risk of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias based on burden of late gadolinium enhancement. Cardiac fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography now plays a role in diagnosis, risk stratification, and assessing response to immunosuppressive therapy. Collaborative, multidisciplinary research efforts are needed to further our understanding of this rare, complex disease. Two large multicenter prospective registries-the international Cardiac Sarcoidosis Consortium and the Canadian Cardiac Sarcoidosis Research Group-are enrolling patients to help provide insights into the natural history of the disease and current treatment strategies. Future research should focus on randomized controlled trials comparing different treatment strategies and identifying and testing novel therapeutic agents.

Sensitivity and specificity of serum soluble interleukin-2 receptor for diagnosing sarcoidosis in a population of patients suspected of sarcoidosis

Background

The soluble interleukin 2 receptor (sIL-2R) has been proposed as a marker of disease activity in patients with sarcoidosis. However, no studies have evaluated whether serum sIL-2R measurement is of use in establishing the diagnosis of sarcoidosis in patients who are suspected of sarcoidosis among other diseases.

Methods

A cohort study was conducted, consisting of new patients who visited the immunology outpatient clinic and whose serum sIL-2R levels were available before a definitive diagnosis was established between February 2011 and February 2016. All patients underwent standard diagnostic testing for sarcoidosis (e.g. laboratory tests, radiographic and/or nuclear imaging and/or affected site biopsy). This resulted either in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis or the exclusion of sarcoidosis with the diagnosis of another disease. Results of sIL-2R and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) levels, radiographic and nuclear imaging and histology results were collected and definitive diagnoses were recorded. Sensitivity, specificity, the concordance statistic from the receiver operating characteristic curve and Youden’s Index were calculated to assess the performance of sIL-2R in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis and were compared to ACE, currently one of the most used diagnostic biomarkers in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis.

Results

In total 983 patients were screened for inclusion, of which 189 patients met the inclusion criteria. A total of 101 patients were diagnosed with sarcoidosis after diagnostic workup, of whom 79 were biopsy-proven. In 88 patients a diagnosis other than sarcoidosis was made. The sensitivity and specificity of serum soluble interleukin 2 receptor levels to detect sarcoidosis were 88% and 85%. The sensitivity and specificity of ACE were 62% and 76%. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that sIL-2R receptor is superior to ACE (p<0.0001).

Conclusion

Serum sIL-2R is a sensitive biomarker and superior to ACE in establishing the diagnosis of sarcoidosis and can be used to rule out sarcoidosis in patients suspected of sarcoidosis.