Liver resection versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with hepatic vein tumor thrombus: a propensity score matching analysis

Current perspectives on radiotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma management: a comprehensive review

This review examines the transformative role of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in managing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), spotlighting the progression from traditional EBRT techniques to advanced modalities like intensity-modulated radiotherapy (RT), stereotactic body RT (SBRT), and innovative particle therapy, including proton beam therapy and carbon ion RT. These advancements have significantly improved the precision and efficacy of RT, marking a paradigm shift in the multimodal management of HCC, particularly in addressing complex cases and enhancing local tumor control. The review underscores the synergistic potential of integrating RT with other treatments like transarterial chemoembolization, systemic therapies such as sorafenib, and emerging immunotherapies, illustrating enhanced survival and disease control outcomes. The efficacy of RT is addressed for challenging conditions, including advanced HCC with macrovascular invasion, and RT modalities, like SBRT, are compared against traditional treatments like radiofrequency ablation for early-stage HCC. Additionally, the review accentuates the encouraging outcomes of particle therapy in enhancing local control and survival rates, minimizing treatment-related toxicity, and advocating for continued research and clinical trials. In conclusion, the integration of RT into multimodal HCC treatment strategies, coupled with the emergence of particle therapy, is crucial for advancing oncologic management, emphasizing the need for relentless innovation and personalized treatment approaches.

The Current Evidence of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), an advanced RT technique, is a considerable treatment option for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the distinguishing features of IMRT for HCC have not yet been clearly defined. A systematic review was performed according to the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. The PubMed/MedLine, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and KoreaMed were used to screen eligible studies focusing on treatment outcomes after IMRT for HCC until 18 April 2023. A total of 1755 HCC patients receiving IMRT among 29 studies from 2009 to 2023 were selected for the meta-analysis. The median proportion of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C was 100% (range: 38-100%). Nineteen studies used combined treatment. Pooled rates of response and 1-year local control were 58% (95% confidence interval [CI], 50-65%) and 84% (95% CI, 70-94%), respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was 13 months (range: 5-45 months), and pooled 1- and 3-year OS rates were 59% (95% CI, 52-66%), and 23% (95% CI, 14-33%), respectively. Pooled rates of classic radiation-induced liver disease (RILD), nonclassic RILD, and hepatic toxicity ≥ grade 3 were 2%, 4%, and 4%, respectively. Although most patients had advanced-stage HCC and combined treatment was commonly used, IMRT for HCC showed similar survival to existing RT modalities and relatively low severe toxicity.

Establishment and validation of a prognostic pomogram in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma treated with intensity modulated radiotherapy: a real world study

BACKGROUND

To establish a prognostic model to predict the overall survival (OS) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).

METHODS

The unresectable HCC patients treated with IMRT were retrospectively analyzed and randomized into development cohort (n = 237) and validation cohort (n = 103) in a 7:3 ratio. We developed a prognosis model with the multivariate Cox regression analysis in the development cohort to derive the predictive nomogram, which was then validated in the validation cohort. Model performance was evaluated by the c-index, the area under curve(AUC) and the calibration plot.

RESULTS

A total of 340 patients were enrolled. Tumor numbers > 3 (HR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.21-2.37), AFP ≥ 400 ng/ml (HR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.10-2.10), PLT < 100 × 10^9(HR = 1.7495% CI = 1.11-2.73), ALP > 150U/L (HR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.15-2.37) and prior surgery (HR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.43-0.93) were independent prognostic factors. The nomogram based on independent factors was constructed. The c-index for OS prediction was 0.658 (95% CI, 0.647-0.804) and 0.683 (95% CI, 0.580-0.785) in the development and validation cohort, respectively. The nomogram demonstrated good discriminative ability with AUC rates of 0.726, 0.739 and 0.753 at 1-year, 2-year and 3-year models in the development cohort, and 0.715, 0.756 and 0.780 in the validation cohort, respectively. Additionally, good prognostic discrimination of the nomogram is also reflected in stratifying patients into two subgroups with distinct prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

We constructed a prognostic nomogram for predicting the survival of patients with unresectable HCC treated with IMRT.

Adjuvant anti-PD-1 antibody for hepatocellular carcinoma with high recurrence risks after hepatectomy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The clinical role of postoperative adjuvant therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still unclear. The purpose of our study was to explore the clinical value of postoperative adjuvant anti-programed cell death 1 antibody (PA-PD-1) on the prognosis of HCC patients with high relapse risks after surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data of consecutive HCC patients with high recurrence risks treated with liver resection at our center during January 2019 and March 2021 were prospectively collected. Baseline differences were balanced between HCC patients with (PA-PD-1 group) or without PA-PD-1 (non-PD-1 group) after hepatectomy by propensity-score matching (PSM). Between these two groups, we compared overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Independent prognostic risk factors for OS and RFS were confirmed by Cox regression analysis, and subgroup analysis was also performed.

RESULTS

47 pairs of patients with or without PD-1 treatment after hepatectomy were matched. After PSM, the 1-year and 2-year RFS was 58.4% and 44.1% in the PA-PD-1 group, and 34.0% and 21.3% in the non-PD-1 group (p = 0.008). The OS at 1 year and 2 years was 91.2% and 91.2% in the PA-PD-1 group, compared with 85.1% and 61.7% in the non-PD-1 group (p = 0.024). Multivariable analyses demonstrated that PA-PD-1 was an independent protective predictor associated with RFS and OS. Through subgroup analysis, we concluded that HCC patients with portal venous tumor thrombus (PVTT) or tumor size ≥ 5 cm significantly benefited from PA-PD-1 therapy in RFS and OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant anti-PD-1 antibody can effectively improve the survival outcomes of HCC patients with high relapse risks after hepatectomy in this prospective observational study. This finding should be confirmed by results of the ongoing phase 3 randomized controlled trials.

PD-1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic therapy with or without intensity-modulated radiotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score matching study

Background

Whether intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) can enhance the efficacy of the programmed death (PD)-1 inhibitors combined with anti-angiogenic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is unclear. Therefore, we conducted this multicenter retrospective study to investigate the efficacy of the combination of PD-1 inhibitors with anti-angiogenic therapy and IMRT.

Methods

From April 2019 to March 2022, a total of 197 patients with HCC [combination of PD-1 inhibitors with anti-angiogenic therapy and IMRT (triple therapy group), 54; PD-1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic therapy (control group), 143] were included in our study. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to identify two groups with similar baselines. The objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) of the two groups were compared before and after matching.

Results

Prior to PSM, the triple therapy group had higher ORR (42.6% vs 24.5%, P = 0.013) and more superior median OS (mOS) (20.1 vs 13.3 months, P = 0.009) and median PFS (mPFS) (8.7 vs 5.4 months, P = 0.001) than the control group. Following PSM, the triple therapy group still exhibited better mPFS (8.7 vs 5.4 months, P = 0.013) and mOS (18.5 vs 12.6 months, P = 0.043) than the control group. However, the ORR of the two groups was similar (40% vs 25%, P = 0.152). No significant difference was observed in the treatment-related adverse events between the two groups (P &lt; 0.05 for all).

Conclusions

The combination of PD-1 inhibitors with anti-angiogenic therapy and IMRT for HCC is a promising regimen.

Systematic review of adjuvant external beam radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma following radical hepatectomy

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Recurrence remains the main bottleneck hindering outcomes of hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Owing to technological advances, external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is being increasingly used in the management of HCC; however, there is no consensus on the role of adjuvant EBRT following hepatectomy.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted according to the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. PubMed, MedLine, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Knowledge were used to screen eligible studies (published as of May 1st, 2022) that evaluated the clinical safety and efficacy of EBRT for HCC receiving hepatectomy. The endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

A total of ten studies were eligible (three randomized controlled trials, one phase II trial, and six retrospective comparative studies). The pooled hazard ratio (HR) for median DFS and OS were both in favor of adjuvant EBRT compared with surgery alone (all P<0.05), and the advantage of adjuvant EBRT was also confirmed in subgroups stratified by different populations (narrow margin, P<0.05; microvascular invasion, P<0.05; portal vein tumor thrombus, P<0.05) and study designs (prospective studies, P<0.05; retrospective studies, P<0.05). Adjuvant EBRT was also found to be superior to adjuvant TACE (P<0.05). Pooled rates of overall AEs and severe AEs were 65.3% and 12.2%, but no fatal AEs were reported.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant EBRT can be considered for HCC patients, especially those with a high risk of recurrence. Further studies are required for validation of these findings.

A gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI-based multivariable model using LI-RADS v2018 and other imaging features for preoperative prediction of macrotrabecular-massive hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

To identify imaging features of macrotrabecular-massive hepatocellular carcinoma (MTM-HCC) using LI-RADS v2018 and other imaging features and to develop a gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (EOB-MRI)-based model for pretreatment prediction of MTM-HCC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 93 patients with pathologically proven HCC (39 MTM-HCC and 54 non-MTM-HCC) were retrospectively evaluated with EOB-MRI at 3 T. Imaging analysis according to LI-RADS v2018 was evaluated by two readers. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine independent predictors for MTM-HCC. Different logistic regression models were built based on MRI features, including model A (enhancing capsule, blood products in mass and ascites), model B (enhancing capsule and ascites), model C (blood products in mass and ascites), and model D (blood products in mass and enhancing capsule). Diagnostic performance was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

After multivariate analysis, absence of enhancing capsule (odds ratio = 0.102, p = 0.010), absence of blood products in mass (odds ratio = 0.073, p = 0.030), and with ascites (odds ratio = 55.677, p = 0.028) were identified as independent differential factors for the presence of MTM-HCC. Model A yielded a sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of 35.90% (21.20,52.80), 94.44% (84.60, 98.80), and 0.731 (0.629, 0.818). Model A achieved a comparable AUC than model D (0.731 vs. 0.699, p = 0.333), but a higher AUC than model B (0.731 vs. 0.644, p = 0.048) and model C (0.731 vs. 0.650, p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

The EOB-MRI-based model is promising for noninvasively predicting MTM-HCC and may assist clinicians in pretreatment decisions.