1
|
Momota Y, Bun S, Hirano J, Kamiya K, Ueda R, Iwabuchi Y, Takahata K, Yamamoto Y, Tezuka T, Kubota M, Seki M, Shikimoto R, Mimura Y, Kishimoto T, Tabuchi H, Jinzaki M, Ito D, Mimura M. Amyloid-β prediction machine learning model using source-based morphometry across neurocognitive disorders. Sci Rep 2024; 14:7633. [PMID: 38561395 PMCID: PMC10984960 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-58223-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Previous studies have developed and explored magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based machine learning models for predicting Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, limited research has focused on models incorporating diverse patient populations. This study aimed to build a clinically useful prediction model for amyloid-beta (Aβ) deposition using source-based morphometry, using a data-driven algorithm based on independent component analyses. Additionally, we assessed how the predictive accuracies varied with the feature combinations. Data from 118 participants clinically diagnosed with various conditions such as AD, mild cognitive impairment, frontotemporal lobar degeneration, corticobasal syndrome, progressive supranuclear palsy, and psychiatric disorders, as well as healthy controls were used for the development of the model. We used structural MR images, cognitive test results, and apolipoprotein E status for feature selection. Three-dimensional T1-weighted images were preprocessed into voxel-based gray matter images and then subjected to source-based morphometry. We used a support vector machine as a classifier. We applied SHapley Additive exPlanations, a game-theoretical approach, to ensure model accountability. The final model that was based on MR-images, cognitive test results, and apolipoprotein E status yielded 89.8% accuracy and a receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.888. The model based on MR-images alone showed 84.7% accuracy. Aβ-positivity was correctly detected in non-AD patients. One of the seven independent components derived from source-based morphometry was considered to represent an AD-related gray matter volume pattern and showed the strongest impact on the model output. Aβ-positivity across neurological and psychiatric disorders was predicted with moderate-to-high accuracy and was associated with a probable AD-related gray matter volume pattern. An MRI-based data-driven machine learning approach can be beneficial as a diagnostic aid.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuki Momota
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
- Department of Functional Brain Imaging Research, Institute for Quantum Medical Science, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-Ku, Chiba-Shi, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan
| | - Shogyoku Bun
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan.
| | - Jinichi Hirano
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan.
| | - Kei Kamiya
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Ryo Ueda
- Office of Radiation Technology, Keio University Hospital, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Yu Iwabuchi
- Department of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Keisuke Takahata
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
- Department of Functional Brain Imaging Research, Institute for Quantum Medical Science, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-Ku, Chiba-Shi, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan
| | - Yasuharu Yamamoto
- Department of Functional Brain Imaging Research, Institute for Quantum Medical Science, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-Ku, Chiba-Shi, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan
| | - Toshiki Tezuka
- Department of Neurology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Masahito Kubota
- Department of Neurology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Morinobu Seki
- Department of Neurology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Ryo Shikimoto
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Yu Mimura
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Taishiro Kishimoto
- Psychiatry Department, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine, Hempstead, NY, 11549, USA
- Hills Joint Research Laboratory for Future Preventive Medicine and Wellness, Keio University School of Medicine, Mori JP Tower F7, 1-3-1 Azabudai, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 106-0041, Japan
| | - Hajime Tabuchi
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Masahiro Jinzaki
- Department of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Daisuke Ito
- Department of Physiology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
- Memory Center, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Masaru Mimura
- Center for Preventive Medicine, Keio University, Mori JP Tower 7th Floor, 1-3-1 Azabudai, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 106-0041, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Su Y, Protas H, Luo J, Chen K, Alosco ML, Adler CH, Balcer LJ, Bernick C, Au R, Banks SJ, Barr WB, Coleman MJ, Dodick DW, Katz DI, Marek KL, McClean MD, McKee AC, Mez J, Daneshvar DH, Palmisano JN, Peskind ER, Turner RW, Wethe JV, Rabinovici G, Johnson K, Tripodis Y, Cummings JL, Shenton ME, Stern RA, Reiman EM. Flortaucipir tau PET findings from former professional and college American football players in the DIAGNOSE CTE research project. Alzheimers Dement 2024; 20:1827-1838. [PMID: 38134231 PMCID: PMC10984430 DOI: 10.1002/alz.13602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2023] [Revised: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Tau is a key pathology in chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE). Here, we report our findings in tau positron emission tomography (PET) measurements from the DIAGNOSE CTE Research Project. METHOD We compare flortaucipir PET measures from 104 former professional players (PRO), 58 former college football players (COL), and 56 same-age men without exposure to repetitive head impacts (RHI) or traumatic brain injury (unexposed [UE]); characterize their associations with RHI exposure; and compare players who did or did not meet diagnostic criteria for traumatic encephalopathy syndrome (TES). RESULTS Significantly elevated flortaucipir uptake was observed in former football players (PRO+COL) in prespecified regions (p < 0.05). Association between regional flortaucipir uptake and estimated cumulative head impact exposure was only observed in the superior frontal region in former players over 60 years old. Flortaucipir PET was not able to differentiate TES groups. DISCUSSION Additional studies are needed to further understand tau pathology in CTE and other individuals with a history of RHI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Su
- Banner Alzheimer's Institute and Arizona Alzheimer's ConsortiumPhoenixArizonaUSA
| | - Hillary Protas
- Banner Alzheimer's Institute and Arizona Alzheimer's ConsortiumPhoenixArizonaUSA
| | - Ji Luo
- Banner Alzheimer's Institute and Arizona Alzheimer's ConsortiumPhoenixArizonaUSA
| | - Kewei Chen
- Banner Alzheimer's Institute and Arizona Alzheimer's ConsortiumPhoenixArizonaUSA
| | - Michael L. Alosco
- Department of NeurologyBoston University Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterBoston University CTE CenterBoston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of MedicineBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Charles H. Adler
- Department of NeurologyMayo Clinic College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic ArizonaScottsdaleArizonaUSA
| | - Laura J. Balcer
- Departments of NeurologyNYU Grossman School of MedicineNew YorkNew YorkUSA
- Department of Population Health and OphthalmologyNYU Grossman School of MedicineNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Charles Bernick
- Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain HealthLas VegasNevadaUSA
- Department of NeurologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Rhoda Au
- Department of NeurologyBoston University Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterBoston University CTE CenterBoston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of MedicineBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Framingham Heart StudyFraminghamMassachusettsUSA
- Slone Epidemiology Center; Departments of Anatomy & Neurobiology, Neurology, and MedicineDepartment of EpidemiologyBoston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine; Boston University School of Public HealthBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Sarah J. Banks
- Departments of Neuroscience and PsychiatryUniversity of CaliforniaSan DiegoCaliforniaUSA
| | - William B. Barr
- Departments of NeurologyNYU Grossman School of MedicineNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Michael J. Coleman
- Departments of Psychiatry and RadiologyPsychiatry Neuroimaging LaboratoryBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - David W. Dodick
- Department of NeurologyMayo Clinic College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic ArizonaScottsdaleArizonaUSA
| | - Douglas I. Katz
- Department of NeurologyBoston University Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterBoston University CTE CenterBoston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of MedicineBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Encompass Health Braintree Rehabilitation HospitalBraintreeMassachusettsUSA
| | - Kenneth L. Marek
- Institute for Neurodegenerative Disorders, Invicro, LLCNew HavenConnecticutUSA
| | - Michael D. McClean
- Department of Environmental HealthBoston University School of Public HealthBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Ann C. McKee
- Department of NeurologyBoston University Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterBoston University CTE CenterBoston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of MedicineBostonMassachusettsUSA
- VA Boston Healthcare SystemBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Jesse Mez
- Department of NeurologyBoston University Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterBoston University CTE CenterBoston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of MedicineBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Framingham Heart StudyFraminghamMassachusettsUSA
| | - Daniel H. Daneshvar
- Department of Physical Medicine & RehabilitationMassachusetts General Hospital, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolCharlestownMassachusettsUSA
| | - Joseph N. Palmisano
- Boston University Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Boston University CTE Center, Biostatistics and Epidemiology Data Analytics Center (BEDAC), Boston University School of Public HealthBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Elaine R. Peskind
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesVA Northwest Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, VA Puget Sound Health Care System; University of Washington School of MedicineSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Robert W. Turner
- Department of Clinical Research & LeadershipThe George Washington University School of Medicine & Health SciencesWashingtonDistrict of ColumbiaUSA
| | - Jennifer V. Wethe
- Department of Psychiatry and PsychologyMayo Clinic School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic ArizonaScottsdaleArizonaUSA
| | - Gil Rabinovici
- Department of NeurologyUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Keith Johnson
- Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Mass General Research Institute, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Yorghos Tripodis
- Department of NeurologyBoston University Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterBoston University CTE CenterBoston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of MedicineBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Department of BiostatisticsBoston University School of Public HealthBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Jeffrey L. Cummings
- Department of Brain HealthChambers‐Grundy Center for Transformative NeuroscienceSchool of Integrated Health Sciences, University of Nevada Las VegasLas VegasNevadaUSA
| | - Martha E. Shenton
- Departments of Psychiatry and RadiologyPsychiatry Neuroimaging LaboratoryBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Robert A. Stern
- Department of NeurologyBoston University Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterBoston University CTE CenterBoston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of MedicineBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Eric M. Reiman
- Banner Alzheimer's Institute and Arizona Alzheimer's ConsortiumPhoenixArizonaUSA
- University of Arizona, Arizona State University, Translational Genomics Research InstitutePhoenixArizonaUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Burnham SC, Iaccarino L, Pontecorvo MJ, Fleisher AS, Lu M, Collins EC, Devous MD. A review of the flortaucipir literature for positron emission tomography imaging of tau neurofibrillary tangles. Brain Commun 2023; 6:fcad305. [PMID: 38187878 PMCID: PMC10768888 DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcad305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease is defined by the presence of β-amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tau tangles potentially preceding clinical symptoms by many years. Previously only detectable post-mortem, these pathological hallmarks are now identifiable using biomarkers, permitting an in vivo definitive diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. 18F-flortaucipir (previously known as 18F-T807; 18F-AV-1451) was the first tau positron emission tomography tracer to be introduced and is the only Food and Drug Administration-approved tau positron emission tomography tracer (Tauvid™). It has been widely adopted and validated in a number of independent research and clinical settings. In this review, we present an overview of the published literature on flortaucipir for positron emission tomography imaging of neurofibrillary tau tangles. We considered all accessible peer-reviewed literature pertaining to flortaucipir through 30 April 2022. We found 474 relevant peer-reviewed publications, which were organized into the following categories based on their primary focus: typical Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment and pre-symptomatic populations; atypical Alzheimer's disease; non-Alzheimer's disease neurodegenerative conditions; head-to-head comparisons with other Tau positron emission tomography tracers; and technical considerations. The available flortaucipir literature provides substantial evidence for the use of this positron emission tomography tracer in assessing neurofibrillary tau tangles in Alzheimer's disease and limited support for its use in other neurodegenerative disorders. Visual interpretation and quantitation approaches, although heterogeneous, mostly converge and demonstrate the high diagnostic and prognostic value of flortaucipir in Alzheimer's disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Ming Lu
- Avid, Eli Lilly and Company, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gatto RG, Carlos AF, Reichard RR, Lowe VJ, Whitwell JL, Josephs KA. Comparative assessment of regional tau distribution by Tau-PET and Post-mortem neuropathology in a representative set of Alzheimer's & frontotemporal lobar degeneration patients. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0284182. [PMID: 37167210 PMCID: PMC10174492 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Flortaucipir (FTP) PET is a key imaging technique to evaluate tau burden indirectly. However, it appears to have greater utility for 3R+4R tau found in Alzheimer's disease (AD), compared to other non-AD tauopathies. The purpose of this study is to determine how flortaucipir uptake links to neuropathologically determined tau burden in AD and non-AD tauopathies. We identified nine individuals who had undergone antemortem tau-PET and postmortem neuropathological analyses. The cohort included three patients with low, moderate, and high AD neuropathologic changes (ADNC), five patients with a non-AD tauopathy (one Pick's disease, three progressive supranuclear palsies, and one globular glial tauopathy), and one control without ADNC. We compared regional flortaucipir PET uptake with tau burden using an anti-AT8 antibody. There was a very good correlation between flortaucipir uptake and tau burden in those with ADNC although, in one ADNC patient, flortaucipir uptake and tau burden did not match due to the presence of argyrophilic grains disease. Non-AD patients showed lower flortaucipir uptake globally compared to ADNC patients. In the non-AD patients, some regional associations between flortaucipir uptake and histopathological tau burden were observed. Flortaucipir uptake is strongly linked to underlying tau burden in patients with ADNC but there are instances where they do not match. On-the-other hand, flortaucipir has a limited capacity to represent histopathological tau burden in non-AD patients although there are instances where regional uptake correlates with regional tau burden. There is a definite need for the development of future generations of tau-PET ligands that can detect non-AD tau.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodolfo G Gatto
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Arenn F Carlos
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - R Ross Reichard
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Val J Lowe
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Jennifer L Whitwell
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Keith A Josephs
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Josephs KA, Tosakulwong N, Gatto RG, Weigand SD, Ali F, Botha H, Graff‐Radford J, Machulda MM, Savica R, Schwarz CG, Senjem ML, Boeve BF, Kantarci K, Jones DT, Ramanan VK, Fields JA, Reichard RR, Dickson DW, Petersen RC, Jack CR, Lowe VJ, Whitwell JL. Optimum Differentiation of Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration from Alzheimer Disease Achieved with Cross-Sectional Tau Positron Emission Tomography. Ann Neurol 2022; 92:1016-1029. [PMID: 36054427 PMCID: PMC9804568 DOI: 10.1002/ana.26479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2022] [Revised: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study was undertaken to assess cross-sectional and longitudinal [18 F]-flortaucipir positron emission tomography (PET) uptake in pathologically confirmed frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) and to compare FTLD to cases with high and low levels of Alzheimer disease (AD) neuropathologic changes (ADNC). METHODS One hundred forty-three participants who had completed at least one flortaucipir PET and had autopsy-confirmed FTLD (n = 52) or high (n = 58) or low ADNC (n = 33) based on Braak neurofibrillary tangle stages 0-IV versus V-VI were included. Flortaucipir standard uptake value ratios (SUVRs) were calculated for 9 regions of interest (ROIs): an FTLD meta-ROI, midbrain, globus pallidum, an AD meta-ROI, entorhinal, inferior temporal, orbitofrontal, precentral, and medial parietal. Linear mixed effects models were used to compare mean baseline SUVRs and annual rate of change in SUVR by group. Sensitivity and specificity to distinguish FTLD from high and low ADNC were calculated. RESULTS Baseline uptake in the FTLD meta-ROI, midbrain, and globus pallidus was greater in FTLD than high and low ADNC. No region showed a greater rate of flortaucipir accumulation in FTLD. Baseline uptake in the AD-related regions and orbitofrontal and precentral cortices was greater in high ADNC, and all showed greater rates of accumulation compared to FTLD. Baseline differences were superior to longitudinal rates in differentiating FTLD from high and low ADNC. A simple baseline metric of midbrain/inferior temporal ratio of flortaucipir uptake provided good to excellent differentiation between FTLD and high and low ADNC (sensitivities/specificities = 94%/95% and 71%/70%). INTERPRETATION There are cross-sectional and longitudinal differences in flortaucipir uptake between FTLD and high and low ADNC. However, optimum differentiation between FTLD and ADNC was achieved with baseline uptake rather than longitudinal rates. ANN NEUROL 2022;92:1016-1029.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Farwa Ali
- Department of NeurologyMayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| | - Hugo Botha
- Department of NeurologyMayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| | | | - Mary M. Machulda
- Department of Psychiatry and PsychologyMayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| | | | | | - Matthew L. Senjem
- Department of RadiologyMayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA,Department of Information TechnologyMayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| | | | | | | | | | - Julie A. Fields
- Department of Psychiatry and PsychologyMayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| | - Ross R. Reichard
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and PathologyMayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| | - Dennis W. Dickson
- Department of Neuroscience (Neurogenetics)Mayo ClinicJacksonvilleFLUSA
| | | | | | - Val J. Lowe
- Department of RadiologyMayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Momota Y, Konishi M, Takahata K, Kishimoto T, Tezuka T, Bun S, Tabuchi H, Ito D, Mimura M. Case report: Non-Alzheimer's disease tauopathy with logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia diagnosed using amyloid and tau PET. Front Neurol 2022; 13:1049113. [DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1049113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
We report a patient with logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia (lv-PPA) who was diagnosed as having non-Alzheimer's disease (AD) tauopathy after multiple biophysical/biological examinations, including amyloid and 18F-florzolotau tau positron emission tomography (PET), had been performed. A woman in her late 60s who had previously been diagnosed as having AD was referred to us for a further, detailed examination. She had been unaware of any symptoms at the time of AD diagnosis, but she subsequently became gradually aware of a speech impairment. She talked nearly completely and fluently, although she occasionally exhibited word-finding difficulty and made phonological errors during naming, word fluency testing, and sentence repetition; these findings met the criteria for the diagnosis of lv-PPA, which is known to be observed more commonly in AD than in other proteinopathies. Magnetic resonance imaging, single photon emission computed tomography, and plasma phosphorylated tau and plasma neurofilament light chain measurements showed an AD-like pattern. However, both 11C-Pittsburgh compound-B and 18F-florbetaben amyloid PET showed negative results, whereas 18F-florzolotau tau PET yielded positive results, with radio signals predominantly in the left superior temporal gyrus, middle temporal gyrus, supramarginal gyrus, and frontal operculum. Whole-genome sequencing revealed no known dominantly inherited mutations in AD or frontotemporal lobar degeneration genes, including the genes encoding amyloid precursor protein, microtubule-associated protein tau, presenilin 1 and 2. To the best of our knowledge, this patient was a rare case of lv-PPA who was diagnosed as having non-AD tauopathy based on the results of multiple examinations, including whole-genome sequencing, plasma measurement, and amyloid and 18F-florzolotau tau PET. This case underscores the clinicopathologically heterogeneous nature of this syndrome.
Collapse
|
7
|
Carlos AF, Tosakulwong N, Weigand SD, Buciuc M, Ali F, Clark HM, Botha H, Utianski RL, Machulda MM, Schwarz CG, Reid RI, Senjem ML, Jack CR, Ahlskog JE, Dickson DW, Josephs KA, Whitwell JL. OUP accepted manuscript. Brain Commun 2022; 4:fcac108. [PMID: 35663380 PMCID: PMC9155234 DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcac108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Revised: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Primary four-repeat tauopathies are characterized by depositions of the four-repeat isoform of the microtubule binding protein, tau. The two most common sporadic four-repeat tauopathies are progressive supranuclear palsy and corticobasal degeneration. Because tau PET tracers exhibit poor binding affinity to four-repeat pathology, determining how well in vivo MRI findings relate to underlying pathology is critical to evaluating their utility as surrogate markers to aid in diagnosis and as outcome measures for clinical trials. We studied the relationship of cross-sectional imaging findings, such as MRI volume loss and diffusion tensor imaging white matter tract abnormalities, to tau histopathology in four-repeat tauopathies. Forty-seven patients with antemortem 3 T MRI volumetric and diffusion tensor imaging scans plus post-mortem pathological diagnosis of a four-repeat tauopathy (28 progressive supranuclear palsy; 19 corticobasal degeneration) were included in the study. Tau lesion types (pretangles/neurofibrillary tangles, neuropil threads, coiled bodies, astrocytic lesions) were semiquantitatively graded in disease-specific cortical, subcortical and brainstem regions. Antemortem regional volumes, fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity were modelled using linear regression with post-mortem tau lesion scores considered separately, based on cellular type (neuronal versus glial), or summed (total tau). Results showed that greater total tau burden was associated with volume loss in the subthalamic nucleus (P = 0.001), midbrain (P < 0.001), substantia nigra (P = 0.03) and red nucleus (P = 0.004), with glial lesions substantially driving the associations. Decreased fractional anisotropy and increased mean diffusivity in the superior cerebellar peduncle correlated with glial tau in the cerebellar dentate (P = 0.04 and P = 0.02, respectively) and red nucleus (P < 0.001 for both). Total tau and glial pathology also correlated with increased mean diffusivity in the midbrain (P = 0.02 and P < 0.001, respectively). Finally, increased subcortical white matter mean diffusivity was associated with total tau in superior frontal and precentral cortices (each, P = 0.02). Overall, results showed clear relationships between antemortem MRI changes and pathology in four-repeat tauopathies. Our findings show that brain volume could be a useful surrogate marker of tau pathology in subcortical and brainstem regions, whereas white matter integrity could be a useful marker of tau pathology in cortical regions. Our findings also suggested an important role of glial tau lesions in the pathogenesis of neurodegeneration in four-repeat tauopathies. Thus, development of tau PET tracers selectively binding to glial tau lesions could potentially uncover mechanisms of disease progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arenn F. Carlos
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Nirubol Tosakulwong
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Stephen D. Weigand
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Marina Buciuc
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Farwa Ali
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | | | - Hugo Botha
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | | | - Mary M. Machulda
- Department of Psychology and Psychiatry, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | | | - Robert I. Reid
- Department of Psychology and Psychiatry, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Matthew L. Senjem
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
- Department of Information Technology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Clifford R. Jack
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - J. Eric Ahlskog
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Dennis W. Dickson
- Department of Neuroscience, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
| | | | - Jennifer L. Whitwell
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
- Correspondence to: Jennifer L. Whitwell, PhD Professor of Radiology, Department of Radiology Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW Rochester, MN 55905, USA E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|