Independent Poor Prognostic Factors for True Progression after Radiation Therapy and Concomitant Temozolomide in Patients with Glioblastoma: Subependymal Enhancement and Low ADC Value

Imaging and Liquid Biopsy for Distinguishing True Progression From Pseudoprogression in Gliomas, Current Advances and Challenges

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Gliomas are aggressive brain tumors with a poor prognosis. Assessing treatment response is challenging because magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may not distinguish true progression (TP) from pseudoprogression (PsP). This review aims to discuss imaging techniques and liquid biopsies used to distinguish TP from PsP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This review synthesizes existing literature to examine advances in imaging techniques, such as magnetic resonance diffusion imaging (MRDI), perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI) MRI, and liquid biopsies, for identifying TP or PsP through tumor markers and tissue characteristics.

RESULTS

Advanced imaging techniques, including MRDI and PWI MRI, have proven effective in delineating tumor tissue properties, offering valuable insights into glioma behavior. Similarly, liquid biopsy has emerged as a potent tool for identifying tumor-derived markers in biofluids, offering a non-invasive glimpse into tumor evolution. Despite their promise, these methodologies grapple with significant challenges. Their sensitivity remains inconsistent, complicating the accurate differentiation between TP and PSP. Furthermore, the absence of standardized protocols across platforms impedes the reliability of comparisons, while inherent biological variability adds complexity to data interpretation.

CONCLUSION

Their potential applications have been highlighted, but gaps remain before routine clinical use. Further research is needed to develop and validate these promising methods for distinguishing TP from PsP in gliomas.

Immune-related lncRNAs signature and radiomics signature predict the prognosis and immune microenvironment of glioblastoma multiforme

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common primary malignant brain tumor in adults. This study aimed to construct immune-related long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) signature and radiomics signature to probe the prognosis and immune infiltration of GBM patients.

METHODS

We downloaded GBM RNA-seq data and clinical information from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project database, and MRI data were obtained from The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA). Then, we conducted a cox regression analysis to establish the immune-related lncRNAs signature and radiomics signature. Afterward, we employed a gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) to explore the biological processes and pathways. Besides, we used CIBERSORT to estimate the abundance of tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TIICs). Furthermore, we investigated the relationship between the immune-related lncRNAs signature, radiomics signature and immune checkpoint genes. Finally, we constructed a multifactors prognostic model and compared it with the clinical prognostic model.

RESULTS

We identified four immune-related lncRNAs and two radiomics features, which show the ability to stratify patients into high-risk and low-risk groups with significantly different survival rates. The risk score curves and Kaplan-Meier curves confirmed that the immune-related lncRNAs signature and radiomics signature were a novel independent prognostic factor in GBM patients. The GSEA suggested that the immune-related lncRNAs signature were involved in L1 cell adhesion molecular (L1CAM) interactions and the radiomics signature were involved signaling by Robo receptors. Besides, the two signatures was associated with the infiltration of immune cells. Furthermore, they were linked with the expression of critical immune genes and could predict immunotherapy's clinical response. Finally, the area under the curve (AUC) (0.890,0.887) and C-index (0.737,0.817) of the multifactors prognostic model were greater than those of the clinical prognostic model in both the training and validation sets, indicated significantly improved discrimination.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified the immune-related lncRNAs signature and tradiomics signature that can predict the outcomes, immune cell infiltration, and immunotherapy response in patients with GBM.

Undetected pseudoprogressions in the CeTeG/NOA-09 trial: hints from postprogression survival and MRI analyses

PURPOSE

In the randomized CeTeG/NOA-09 trial, lomustine/temozolomide (CCNU/TMZ) was superior to TMZ therapy regarding overall survival (OS) in MGMT promotor-methylated glioblastoma. Progression-free survival (PFS) and pseudoprogression rates (about 10%) were similar in both arms. Further evaluating this discrepancy, we analyzed patterns of postprogression survival (PPS) and MRI features at first progression according to modified RANO criteria (mRANO).

METHODS

We classified the patients of the CeTeG/NOA-09 trial according to long vs. short PPS employing a cut-off of 18 months and compared baseline characteristics and survival times. In patients with available MRIs and confirmed progression, the increase in T1-enhancing, FLAIR hyperintense lesion volume and the change in ADC mean value of contrast-enhancing tumor upon progression were determined.

RESULTS

Patients with long PPS in the CCNU/TMZ arm had a particularly short PFS (5.6 months). PFS in this subgroup was shorter than in the long PPS subgroup of the TMZ arm (11.1 months, p = 0.01). At mRANO-defined progression, patients of the CCNU/TMZ long PPS subgroup had a significantly higher increase of mean ADC values (p = 0.015) and a tendency to a stronger volumetric increase in T1-enhancement (p = 0.22) as compared to long PPS patients of the TMZ arm.

CONCLUSION

The combination of survival and MRI analyses identified a subgroup of CCNU/TMZ-treated patients with features that sets them apart from other patients in the trial: short first PFS despite long PPS and significant increase in mean ADC values upon mRANO-defined progression. The observed pattern is compatible with the features commonly observed in pseudoprogression suggesting mRANO-undetected pseudoprogressions in the CCNU/TMZ arm of CeTeG/NOA-09.

Tumor Progression and Treatment-Related Changes: Radiological Diagnosis Challenges for the Evaluation of Post Treated Glioma

Simple Summary

Glioma is the most common primary malignant tumor of the adult central nervous system. Despite aggressive multimodal treatment, its prognosis remains poor. During follow-up, it remains challenging to distinguish treatment-related changes from tumor progression in treated patients with gliomas due to both share clinical symptoms and morphological imaging characteristics (with new and/or increasing enhancing mass lesions). The early effective identification of tumor progression and treatment-related changes is of great significance for the prognosis and treatment of gliomas. We believe that advanced neuroimaging techniques can provide additional information for distinguishing both at an early stage. In this article, we focus on the research of magnetic resonance imaging technology and artificial intelligence in tumor progression and treatment-related changes. Finally, it provides new ideas and insights for clinical diagnosis.

Abstract

As the most common neuro-epithelial tumors of the central nervous system in adults, gliomas are highly malignant and easy to recurrence, with a dismal prognosis. Imaging studies are indispensable for tracking tumor progression (TP) or treatment-related changes (TRCs). During follow-up, distinguishing TRCs from TP in treated patients with gliomas remains challenging as both share similar clinical symptoms and morphological imaging characteristics (with new and/or increasing enhancing mass lesions) and fulfill criteria for progression. Thus, the early identification of TP and TRCs is of great significance for determining the prognosis and treatment. Histopathological biopsy is currently the gold standard for TP and TRC diagnosis. However, the invasive nature of this technique limits its clinical application. Advanced imaging methods (e.g., diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), perfusion MRI, magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), positron emission tomography (PET), amide proton transfer (APT) and artificial intelligence (AI)) provide a non-invasive and feasible technical means for identifying of TP and TRCs at an early stage, which have recently become research hotspots. This paper reviews the current research on using the abovementioned advanced imaging methods to identify TP and TRCs of gliomas. First, the review focuses on the pathological changes of the two entities to establish a theoretical basis for imaging identification. Then, it elaborates on the application of different imaging techniques and AI in identifying the two entities. Finally, the current challenges and future prospects of these techniques and methods are discussed.

Discriminators of pseudoprogression and true progression in high-grade gliomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis

High-grade gliomas remain the most common primary brain tumour with limited treatments options and early recurrence rates following adjuvant treatments. However, differentiating true tumour progression (TTP) from treatment-related effects or pseudoprogression (PsP), may critically influence subsequent management options. Structural MRI is routinely employed to evaluate treatment responses, but misdiagnosis of TTP or PsP may lead to continuation of ineffective or premature cessation of effective treatments, respectively. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses method. Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science and Google Scholar were searched for methods applied to differentiate PsP and TTP, and studies were selected using pre-specified eligibility criteria. The sensitivity and specificity of included studies were summarised. Three of the identified methods were compared in a separate subgroup meta-analysis. Thirty studies assessing seven distinct neuroimaging methods in 1372 patients were included in the systematic review. The highest performing methods in the subgroup analysis were DWI (AUC = 0.93 [0.91-0.95]) and DSC-MRI (AUC = 0.93 [0.90-0.95]), compared to DCE-MRI (AUC = 0.90 [0.87-0.93]). 18F-fluoroethyltyrosine PET (18F-FET PET) and amide proton transfer-weighted MRI (APTw-MRI) also showed high diagnostic accuracy, but results were based on few low-powered studies. Both DWI and DSC-MRI performed with high sensitivity and specificity for differentiating PsP from TTP. Considering the technical parameters and feasibility of each identified method, the authors suggested that, at present, DSC-MRI technique holds the most clinical potential.

Conventional MRI Criteria to Differentiate Progressive Disease from Treatment-Induced Effects in High-Grade (WHO Grade 3-4) Gliomas

BACKGROUND

Post-treatment radiological deterioration of patients with an irradiated high-grade (WHO grade 3-4) glioma (HGG) may be the result of true progressive disease (PD) or treatment-induced effects (TIE). Differentiation between these entities is of great importance, but remains a diagnostic challenge. This study assesses the diagnostic value of conventional MRI characteristics to differentiate PD from TIE in HGGs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this single-centre, retrospective, consecutive cohort study, we included adults with a HGG, who were treated with (chemo-)radiotherapy and subsequently developed a new or increasing contrast-enhancing lesion on conventional follow-up MRI. TIE and PD were defined radiologically as stable/decreased for ≥6 weeks or RANO-progression, and histologically as TIE without viable tumour or PD. Two neuroradiologists assessed twenty-one preselected MRI characteristics of the progressive lesions. The statistical analysis included logistic regression to develop a) a full multivariable model b) a diagnostic model with model reduction, and a Cohen's Kappa interrater reliability (IRR) coefficient.

RESULTS

210 patients (median age=61, IQR=54-68, 189 males) with 284 lesions were included, of which 141 (50%) had PD. Median time to PD was 2 (0.7-6.1) and to TIE 0.9 (0.7-3.5) months after radiotherapy. After multivariable modelling and model reduction, the following determinants prevailed: Radiation dose (Odds ratio (OR)=0.68, 95%-CI=0.49-0.93), longer time to progression (TTP, OR=3.56, 95%-CI=1.84-6.88), marginal enhancement (OR=2.04, 95%-CI=1.09-3.83), soap bubble enhancement (OR=2.63, 95%-CI=1.39-4.98) and isointense apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)-signal (OR=2.11, 95%-CI=1.05-4.24). ORs>1 indicate higher odds of PD. The Hosmer&Lemeshow test showed good calibration (p=0.947) and the area under the ROC-curve was 0.722 (95%-CI=0.66-0.78). In the glioblastoma subgroup, TTP, marginal enhancement and ADC-signal were significant. IRR analysis between neuroradiologists revealed moderate to near-perfect agreement for the predictive items, but poor agreement for others.

DISCUSSION

Several characteristics from conventional MRI are significant predictors for the discrimination between PD and TIE. However, IRR was variable. Conventional MRI characteristics from this study should be incorporated into a multimodal diagnostic model with advanced imaging techniques.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class II evidence that in patients with irradiated HGGs, radiation dose, longer time to progression, marginal enhancement, soap bubble enhancement and isointense apparent ADC-signal distinguish PD from TIE.

Radiomics-based neural network predicts recurrence patterns in glioblastoma using dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI

Glioblastoma remains the most devastating brain tumor despite optimal treatment, because of the high rate of recurrence. Distant recurrence has distinct genomic alterations compared to local recurrence, which requires different treatment planning both in clinical practice and trials. To date, perfusion-weighted MRI has revealed that perfusional characteristics of tumor are associated with prognosis. However, not much research has focused on recurrence patterns in glioblastoma: namely, local and distant recurrence. Here, we propose two different neural network models to predict the recurrence patterns in glioblastoma that utilizes high-dimensional radiomic profiles based on perfusion MRI: area under the curve (AUC) (95% confidence interval), 0.969 (0.903-1.000) for local recurrence; 0.864 (0.726-0.976) for distant recurrence for each patient in the validation set. This creates an opportunity to provide personalized medicine in contrast to studies investigating only group differences. Moreover, interpretable deep learning identified that salient radiomic features for each recurrence pattern are related to perfusional intratumoral heterogeneity. We also demonstrated that the combined salient radiomic features, or "radiomic risk score", increased risk of recurrence/progression (hazard ratio, 1.61; p = 0.03) in multivariate Cox regression on progression-free survival.

Imaging Glioblastoma Posttreatment: Progression, Pseudoprogression, Pseudoresponse, Radiation Necrosis

Radiographic monitoring of posttreatment glioblastoma is important for clinical trials and determining next steps in management. Evaluation for tumor progression is confounded by the presence of treatment-related radiographic changes, making a definitive determination less straight-forward. The purpose of this article was to describe imaging tools available for assessing treatment response in glioblastoma, as well as to highlight the definitions, pathophysiology, and imaging features typical of true progression, pseudoprogression, pseudoresponse, and radiation necrosis.

Advanced magnetic resonance imaging to support clinical drug development for malignant glioma

Even though the treatment options and survival of patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), the most common type of malignant glioma, have improved over the past decade, there is still a high unmet medical need to develop novel therapies. Complexity in pathology and therapy require biomarkers to characterize tumors, to define malignant and active areas, to assess disease prognosis, and to quantify and monitor therapy response. While conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques have improved these assessments, limitations remain. In this review, we evaluate the role of various non-invasive biomarkers based on advanced structural and functional MRI techniques in the context of GBM drug development over the past 5 years.

Imaging Glioblastoma Posttreatment: Progression, Pseudoprogression, Pseudoresponse, Radiation Necrosis

Radiographic monitoring of posttreatment glioblastoma is important for clinical trials and determining next steps in management. Evaluation for tumor progression is confounded by the presence of treatment-related radiographic changes, making a definitive determination less straight-forward. The purpose of this article was to describe imaging tools available for assessing treatment response in glioblastoma, as well as to highlight the definitions, pathophysiology, and imaging features typical of true progression, pseudoprogression, pseudoresponse, and radiation necrosis.

Differentiation of treatment-related changes from tumour progression: a direct comparison between dynamic FET PET and ADC values obtained from DWI MRI

BACKGROUND

Following brain cancer treatment, the capacity of anatomical MRI to differentiate neoplastic tissue from treatment-related changes (e.g., pseudoprogression) is limited. This study compared apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) obtained by diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) with static and dynamic parameters of O-(2-[¹⁸F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) PET for the differentiation of treatment-related changes from tumour progression.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-eight pretreated high-grade glioma patients with anatomical MRI findings suspicious for progression (median time elapsed since last treatment was 16 weeks) were investigated using DWI and dynamic FET PET. Maximum and mean tumour-to-brain ratios (TBR_max, TBR_mean) as well as dynamic parameters (time-to-peak and slope values) of FET uptake were calculated. For mean ADC calculation, regions-of-interest analyses were performed on ADC maps calculated from DWI coregistered with the contrast-enhanced MR image. Diagnoses were confirmed neuropathologically (21%) or clinicoradiologically. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver-operating-characteristic analyses or Fisher's exact test for a combinational approach.

RESULTS

Ten of 48 patients had treatment-related changes (21%). The diagnostic performance of FET PET was significantly higher (threshold for both TBR_max and TBR_mean, 1.95; accuracy, 83%; AUC, 0.89 ± 0.05; P < 0.001) than that of ADC values (threshold ADC, 1.09 × 10^-3 mm²/s; accuracy, 69%; AUC, 0.73 ± 0.09; P = 0.13). The addition of static FET PET parameters to ADC values increased the latter's accuracy to 89%. The highest accuracy was achieved by combining static and dynamic FET PET parameters (93%). Moreover, in contrast to ADC values, TBRs <1.95 at suspected progression predicted a significantly longer survival (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Data suggest that static and dynamic FET PET provide valuable information concerning the differentiation of early treatment-related changes from tumour progression and outperform ADC measurement for this highly relevant clinical question.

The Value of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Predicting the Efficacy of Radiation and Chemotherapy in Cervical Cancer

Background

To analyze the application value of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and exponent apparent diffusion coefficient (EADC) in evaluating the efficacy of radiation and chemotherapy in cervical cancer using pre- and posttreatment diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) scans.

Methods

52 patients with cervical cancer were administered radiation and chemotherapy. Both MRI and DW-MRI were obtained at different stages. The ADC and EADC values, as well as the maximum tumor diameter, were measured and analyzed.

Results

We found that the ADC value increased after treatment, and the EADC value decreased. Changes in the calculated ADC occurred earlier than the morphologic changes of the tumors. A negative correlation was detected between reduced rates in the maximum tumor diameter two months after treatment and pretreatment ADC value (r = –0.658, P < 0.05). An ROC curve and nonlinear regression analysis showed that the formula, y = (1525500.122x² – 4689.962x + 3.482) × 100%, can be used to calculate the percentage of complete remission after treatment according to the pretreatment ADC value.

Conclusion

Our data suggest that pretreatment ADC and EADC values are predictive of the efficacy of radiation and chemotherapy. Both ADC and EADC values during treatment were instrumental in early monitoring and dynamic observation.

Neuroimaging classification of progression patterns in glioblastoma: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Our primary objective was to report the current neuroimaging classification systems of spatial patterns of progression in glioblastoma. In addition, we aimed to report the terminology used to describe 'progression' and to assess the compliance with the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) Criteria.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review to identify all neuroimaging studies of glioblastoma that have employed a categorical classification system of spatial progression patterns. Our review was registered with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) registry.

RESULTS

From the included 157 results, we identified 129 studies that used labels of spatial progression patterns that were not based on radiation volumes (Group 1) and 50 studies that used labels that were based on radiation volumes (Group 2). In Group 1, we found 113 individual labels and the most frequent were: local/localised (58%), distant/distal (51%), diffuse (20%), multifocal (15%) and subependymal/subventricular zone (15%). We identified 13 different labels used to refer to 'progression', of which the most frequent were 'recurrence' (99%) and 'progression' (92%). We identified that 37% (n = 33/90) of the studies published following the release of the RANO classification were adherent compliant with the RANO criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

Our review reports significant heterogeneity in the published systems used to classify glioblastoma spatial progression patterns. Standardization of terminology and classification systems used in studying progression would increase the efficiency of our research in our attempts to more successfully treat glioblastoma.

Pseudoprogression of brain tumors

This review describes the definition, incidence, clinical implications, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of pseudoprogression of brain tumors, in particular, but not limited to, high-grade glioma. Pseudoprogression is an important clinical problem after brain tumor treatment, interfering not only with day-to-day patient care but also the execution and interpretation of clinical trials. Radiologically, pseudoprogression is defined as a new or enlarging area(s) of contrast agent enhancement, in the absence of true tumor growth, which subsides or stabilizes without a change in therapy. The clinical definitions of pseudoprogression have been quite variable, which may explain some of the differences in reported incidences, which range from 9-30%. Conventional structural MRI is insufficient for distinguishing pseudoprogression from true progressive disease, and advanced imaging is needed to obtain higher levels of diagnostic certainty. Perfusion MRI is the most widely used imaging technique to diagnose pseudoprogression and has high reported diagnostic accuracy. Diagnostic performance of MR spectroscopy (MRS) appears to be somewhat higher, but MRS is less suitable for the routine and universal application in brain tumor follow-up. The combination of MRS and diffusion-weighted imaging and/or perfusion MRI seems to be particularly powerful, with diagnostic accuracy reaching up to or even greater than 90%. While diagnostic performance can be high with appropriate implementation and interpretation, even a combination of techniques, however, does not provide 100% accuracy. It should also be noted that most studies to date are small, heterogeneous, and retrospective in nature. Future improvements in diagnostic accuracy can be expected with harmonization of acquisition and postprocessing, quantitative MRI and computer-aided diagnostic technology, and meticulous evaluation with clinical and pathological data.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018.

Imaging in neuro-oncology

Imaging plays several key roles in managing brain tumors, including diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment response assessment. Ongoing challenges remain as new therapies emerge and there are urgent needs to find accurate and clinically feasible methods to noninvasively evaluate brain tumors before and after treatment. This review aims to provide an overview of several advanced imaging modalities including magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography (PET), including advances in new PET agents, and summarize several key areas of their applications, including improving the accuracy of diagnosis and addressing the challenging clinical problems such as evaluation of pseudoprogression and anti-angiogenic therapy, and rising challenges of imaging with immunotherapy.

Multiparametric MRI as a potential surrogate endpoint for decision-making in early treatment response following concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the value of multiparametric MRI for determination of early treatment response following concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

METHODS

A computerized search of Ovid-MEDLINE and EMBASE up to 1 October 2017 was performed to find studies on the diagnostic performance of multiparametric MRI for differentiating true progression from pseudoprogression. The beginning search date was not specified. Pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity were obtained using hierarchical logistic regression modeling. We performed meta-regression and sensitivity analyses to explain the effects of the study heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Nine studies including 456 patients were included. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 84 % (95 % CI 74-91) and 95 % (95 % CI 83-99), respectively. Area under the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.95 (95 % CI 0.92-0.96). Meta-regression showed true progression in the study population, the mean age and the reference standard were significant factors affecting heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

Multiparametric MRI may be used as a potential surrogate endpoint for assessment of early treatment response, especially in the differentiation of true progression from pseudoprogression. However, based on the current evidence, monoparametric and multiparametric MRI perform equally in the clinical context. Further evaluation will be needed.

KEY POINTS

• Multiparametric MRI shows high diagnostic performance for early treatment response in glioblastoma. • Multiparametric MRI could differentiate true progression from pseudoprogression in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. • The normalized rCBV derived from DSC was the most commonly used parameter.

An Update on the Approach to the Imaging of Brain Tumors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Neuroimaging plays a critical role in diagnosis of brain tumors and in assessment of response to therapy. However, challenges remain, including accurately and reproducibly assessing response to therapy, defining endpoints for neuro-oncology trials, providing prognostic information, and differentiating progressive disease from post-therapeutic changes particularly in the setting of antiangiogenic and other novel therapies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent advances in the imaging of brain tumors include application of advanced MRI imaging techniques to assess tumor response to therapy and analysis of imaging features correlating to molecular markers, grade, and prognosis. This review aims to summarize recent advances in imaging as applied to current diagnostic and therapeutic neuro-oncologic challenges.

LBH589 Inhibits Glioblastoma Growth and Angiogenesis Through Suppression of HIF-1α Expression

Glioblastoma (GBM) is an angiogenic malignancy with a highly unfavorable prognosis. Angiogenesis in GBM represents an adaptation to a hypoxic microenvironment and is correlated with tumor growth, invasion, clinical recurrence, and lethality. LBH589 (also called panobinostat) is a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor with potent antitumor activity. In the current study, we investigated the mechanism and effects of LBH589 on GBM growth and hypoxia-induced angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. To determine the antitumor and angiogenesis activity and mechanism of LBH589, we used cell proliferations in vitro and GBM xenografts in vivo. To clarify mechanisms of LBH589 on angiogenesis, HDAC assay, RT-PCR, Western blot, and co-immunoprecipitation assays were performed. We found LBH589 displayed significant antitumor effects on GBM as demonstrated by inhibited cell proliferation, slower tumor growth, and decreased microvessel density of subcutaneous xenografts. These actions of LBH589 resulted from the disruption of heat shock protein 90/HDAC6 complex, increased HIF-1α instability and degradation, and decreased VEGF expression. Our results indicate the potential antiangiogenic activity of LBH589 in human GBM and provide some preclinical data to warrant further exploration of HDAC inhibitors for the treatment of advanced glioma. Moreover, our study supports the role of HDAC inhibitors as a therapeutic strategy to target tumor angiogenesis.

Meta-analysis of diffusion-weighted imaging for predicting locoregional failure of chemoradiotherapy in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for predicting locoregional failure of chemoradiotherapy in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). A comprehensive search was conducted through the EMBASE, PubMed and Cochrane Library databases for relevant publications. Stata software was used to calculate the pooled sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and diagnostic odds ratios, and to construct a summary receiver operating characteristics (sROC) curve for DWI. A total of 9 studies comprising 421 patients were included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio and diagnostic odds ratio were 0.82 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.72-0.88], 0.70 (95% CI: 0.62-0.77), 2.7 (95% CI: 2.1-3.6), 0.26 (95% CI: 0.17-0.41), and 10.48 (95% CI: 5.35-20.53), respectively. The area under the sROC curve was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.81-0.87). Therefore, DWI appears to be a promising imaging modality for predicting local failure of chemoradiotherapy in patients with HNSCC.

Evaluation of pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma

Background

Management of glioblastoma is complicated by pseudoprogression, a radiological phenomenon mimicking progression. This retrospective cohort study investigated the incidence, prognostic implications, and most clinically appropriate definition of pseudoprogression.

Methods

Consecutive glioblastoma patients treated at the Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario between 2004 and 2012 with temozolomide chemoradiotherapy and with contrast-enhanced MRI at standard imaging intervals were included. At each imaging interval, patient responses as per the RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors), MacDonald, and RANO (Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology) criteria were reported. Based on each set of criteria, subjects were classified as having disease response, stable disease, pseudoprogression, or true progression. The primary outcome was overall survival.

Results

The incidence of pseudoprogression among 130 glioblastoma patients treated with chemoradiotherapy was 15%, 19%, and 23% as defined by RANO, MacDonald, and RECIST criteria, respectively. Using the RANO definition, median survival for patients with pseudoprogression was 13.0 months compared with 12.5 months for patients with stable disease (hazard ratio [HR]=0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35-1.42). Similarly, using the MacDonald definition, median survival for the pseudoprogression group was 11.8 months compared with 12.0 months for the stable disease group (HR=0.86; 95% CI, 0.47-1.58). Furthermore, disease response compared with stable disease was also similar using the RANO (HR=0.52; 95% CI, 0.20-1.35) and MacDonald (HR=0.51: 95% CI, 0.20-1.31) definitions.

Conclusions

Of all conventional glioblastoma response criteria, the RANO criteria gave the lowest incidence of pseudoprogression. Regardless of criteria, patients with pseudoprogression did not have statistically significant difference in survival compared with patients with stable disease.