COVID-19 Vaccine-Associated Pneumonitis in the Republic of Korea: A Nationwide Multicenter Survey

Spontaneous regression of acute fibrinous organizing pneumonia induced by COVID-19 vaccination: A case report

A 42-year-old woman visited our hospital with complaints of fever, muscle pain, and dyspnea one week after receiving the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine. Chest high-resolution computed tomography showed a patchy consolidation and ground-glass attenuation in the both lungs, consistent with acute interstitial pneumonia. Transbronchial lung cryobiopsy revealed organizing pneumonia with marked intra-alveolar fibrin, and pathologically diagnosed as acute fibrinous organizing pneumonia (AFOP). Other causative diseases such as dermatomyositis was clinically ruled out, and COVID-19 vaccine-induced AFOP was diagnosed. Physician should check the history of COVID-19 vaccination when encountering a case of AFOP with an unknown cause.

Risk of newly diagnosed interstitial lung disease after COVID-19 and impact of vaccination: a nationwide population-based cohort study

Objectives

Previous studies suggested that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) could lead to pulmonary fibrosis, but the incidence of newly diagnosed interstitial lung disease (ILD) after COVID-19 is unclear. We aimed to determine whether COVID-19 increases the risk of newly diagnosed ILD and whether vaccination against COVID-19 can reduce this risk.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study used data from the Korean National Health Insurance claim-based database. Two study groups and propensity score (PS)-matched control groups were constructed: Study 1: participants diagnosed with COVID-19 (COVID-19 cohort) and their PS-matched controls; Study 2: COVID-19 vaccinated participants (vaccination cohort) and their PS-matched controls.

Results

In Study 1, during a median 6 months of follow-up, 0.50% of the COVID-19 cohort (300/60,518) and 0.04% of controls (27/60,518) developed newly diagnosed ILD, with an incidence of 9.76 and 0.88 per 1,000 person-years, respectively. The COVID-19 cohort had a higher risk of ILD [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 11.01; 95% confidence interval (CI), 7.42-16.32] than controls. In Study 2, the vaccination cohort had a lower risk of newly diagnosed ILD than controls (aHR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.34-0.57).

Conclusion

Using nationwide data, we demonstrated that COVID-19 was associated with a higher incidence rate of newly diagnosed ILD, but that this risk could be mitigated by COVID-19 vaccination.

Interstitial lung disease following COVID-19 vaccination: a disproportionality analysis using the Global Scale Pharmacovigilance Database (VigiBase)

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Despite several case reports, population-based studies on interstitial lung disease (ILD) following COVID-19 vaccination are lacking. Given the unprecedented safety issue of COVID-19 vaccination, it is important to assess the worldwide patterns of ILD following COVID-19 vaccination. This study aimed to investigate the signals of COVID-19 vaccine-associated ILD compared with other vaccinations using disproportionality analysis.

METHODS

We analysed the VigiBase database during the period between 13 December 2020 and 26 January 2023. We adopted the case/non-case approach to assess the disproportionality signal of ILD for COVID-19 vaccines via 1:10 matching by age and sex. We compared COVID-19 vaccines with all other vaccines as the reference group.

RESULTS

Among 1 233 969 vaccine-related reports, 679 were reported for ILD. The majority of ILD cases were related to tozinameran (376 reports, 55.4%), Vaxzevria (129 reports, 19.0%) and elasomeran (78 reports, 11.5%). The reporting OR of ILD following COVID-19 vaccination was 0.86 (95% CI 0.64 to 1.15) compared with all other vaccines.

CONCLUSION

No significant signal of disproportionate reporting of ILD was observed for COVID-19 vaccines compared with all other vaccines. Moreover, when compared with the influenza vaccines that are known to cause ILD, no signal was observed. This study results might help decision-making on the subsequent COVID-19 vaccination strategy of ILD. Further large and prospective studies are required for more conclusive evidence.

Risk factors associated with COVID-19 pneumonia in Chinese patients with pre-existing interstitial lung disease during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic

In China, the emergence of a nationally widespread epidemic infection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2) has appeared within a month since December 7, 2022. To evaluate the risk factors for suffering from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia due to infection with SARS-CoV-2 in different kinds of interstitial lung disease (ILD) patients with diverse immunizations, we conducted this retrospective study on 525 patients with ILDs who underwent regular follow-up in our ILD clinic. Among them, 128 ILD patients (24.4%) suffered from COVID-19 pneumonia after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Patients were older with a male predominance in the pneumonia group than in the nonpneumonia group (65.0 ± 10.0 years vs. 56.4 ± 11.7 years, p < 0.001, 55.5% vs. 39.5%, p = 0.002, respectively). Connective tissue disease-associated ILD (CTD-ILD) (25%), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (23.4%), and interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (21.1%) were the main pre-existing ILDs in the pneumonia group. In Cox multivariable analysis, only male sex and corticosteroid use were risk factors for COVID-19 pneumonia after infection. Two or three doses of vaccination were a protective factor for pre-existing ILD patients suffering from COVID-19 pneumonia. More than two doses of vaccination were strongly recommended for pre-existing ILD patients, particularly for males who were administered corticosteroids.

mRNA: Vaccine or Gene Therapy? The Safety Regulatory Issues

COVID-19 vaccines were developed and approved rapidly in response to the urgency created by the pandemic. No specific regulations existed at the time they were marketed. The regulatory agencies therefore adapted them as a matter of urgency. Now that the pandemic emergency has passed, it is time to consider the safety issues associated with this rapid approval. The mode of action of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines should classify them as gene therapy products (GTPs), but they have been excluded by regulatory agencies. Some of the tests they have undergone as vaccines have produced non-compliant results in terms of purity, quality and batch homogeneity. The wide and persistent biodistribution of mRNAs and their protein products, incompletely studied due to their classification as vaccines, raises safety issues. Post-marketing studies have shown that mRNA passes into breast milk and could have adverse effects on breast-fed babies. Long-term expression, integration into the genome, transmission to the germline, passage into sperm, embryo/fetal and perinatal toxicity, genotoxicity and tumorigenicity should be studied in light of the adverse events reported in pharmacovigilance databases. The potential horizontal transmission (i.e., shedding) should also have been assessed. In-depth vaccinovigilance should be carried out. We would expect these controls to be required for future mRNA vaccines developed outside the context of a pandemic.