Elevated Bone Hardness Under Denosumab Treatment, With Persisting Lower Osteocyte Viability During Discontinuation

The relationship between length of denosumab treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis and serum TRAcP5b measured six months after the last injection

To test the hypothesis that during treatment with denosumab osteomorphs and precursors recycle to higher number of osteoclasts with time, we measured TRAcP5b in serum taken 6 months after the last injection in postmenopausal women treated for 1-10 years. Serum TRAcP5b values were not related to time of exposure to denosumab.

PURPOSE

In women with postmenopausal osteoporosis the aetiology of the observed inverse relationship between duration of denosumab (Dmab) therapy and bone loss after its discontinuation is currently unknown. In studies in mice inhibition of RANKL is associated with an increase in osteomorphs and osteoclast precursors that recycle into osteoclasts and may accumulate with time. We hypothesized that longer inhibition of RANKL by Dmab will be followed by the synchronous formation of a larger number of osteoclasts after stopping treatment. To test this hypothesis, we measured serum TRAcP5b, a marker of osteoclast numbers, in postmenopausal women treated with Dmab for different periods of time up to 10 years.

METHODS

TRAcP5b, C-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen (CTX) and procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP) were measured at 6.0 months ± 15 days after last Dmab injection in 59 women who had received Dmab for 4.0 ± 2.3 years (range 1-10 years). Of these, 38 were treatment naïve (group 1) and 21 had received other treatments prior Dmab (group 2).

RESULTS

Duration of Dmab treatment was not related to serum TRAcP5b values or to TRAcP5b/CTX ratio either in the whole cohort or in each of the two groups separately. In contrast, serum TRAcP5b values were significantly correlated with serum CTX values (rs = 0.619; p < 0.001), but not with serum P1NP values or BMD at all skeletal sites.

CONCLUSION

Our observations indicate that serum TRAcP5b, measured at 6 months after a Dmab injection, is not a useful early marker for time-dependent increased accumulation of osteoclasts in humans and for identification of patients at risk for a higher rebound increase in bone resorption.

The comparison of alendronate and raloxifene after denosumab (CARD) study: A comparative efficacy trial

Denosumab discontinuation results in accelerated bone remodeling, decreased bone mineral density (BMD), and an increased risk of multiple vertebral fractures. Bisphosphonates are at least partially effective at inhibiting these consequences but there have been no randomized clinical trials assessing the efficacy of alternative antiresorptives.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the comparative efficacy of alendronate and the SERM, raloxifene, in preventing the post-denosumab high-turnover bone loss.

METHODS

We conducted an open-label randomized controlled trial in which 51 postmenopausal women at increased risk of fracture were randomized with equal probability to receive 12-months of denosumab 60-mg 6-monthly followed by 12-months of either alendronate 70-mg weekly or raloxifene 60-mg daily. Serum bone remodeling markers were measured at 0,6,12,15,18, and 24 and areal BMD of the distal radius, spine, and hip were measured at 0,12,18 and 24 months.

RESULTS

After denosumab discontinuation, serum markers of bone remodeling remained suppressed when followed by alendronate, but gradually increased to baseline when followed by raloxifene. In the denosumab-to-alendronate group, denosumab-induced BMD gains were maintained at all sites whereas in the denosumab-to-raloxifene group, BMD decreased at the spine by 2.0% (95% CI -3.2 to -0.8, P = 0.003) and at the total hip by 1.2% (-2.1 to -0.4%, P = 0.008), but remained stable at the femoral neck and distal radius and above the original baseline at all sites. The decreases in spine and total hip BMD in the denosumab-to-raloxifene group (but not the femoral neck or distal radius) were significant when compared to the denosumab-to-alendronate group.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that after one year of denosumab, one year of alendronate is better able to maintain the inhibition of bone remodeling and BMD gains than raloxifene.

Sequential Therapy for the Long-Term Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is a chronic condition characterized by decreased bone mass, loss of skeletal integrity, and increased susceptibility to fracture. Drugs used to treat osteoporosis can be classified as those that block bone resorption (antiresorptive), stimulate bone formation (anabolic), or do both. While all currently approved medications reduce the risk of fragility fractures in high-risk populations, they are generally unable to fully restore bone strength in most patients with established disease. Thus, the majority of patients require disease management over many years. Unfortunately, the continuous use of a single drug has limitations, both in terms of efficacy and safety, and so sequential therapy is commonly required. Given the expanding list of pharmacological agents currently available, careful consideration needs to be given as to which drugs to use and in what sequence. This review will evaluate the differential effects of antiresorptive, bone-forming, and dual-acting drugs when used in specific sequences and will explore the current evidence favoring the initial use of bone-forming/dual-acting drugs followed by antiresorptive medications. This review will also examine the notion that long-term treatment with an antiresorptive drug may diminish the efficacy of subsequent treatment with a bone-forming/dual-acting drug. Finally, this review will explore the current evidence pertaining to the specific issue of how to best prevent the clinical ramifications of denosumab cessation.

Novel insights into osteocyte and inter-organ/tissue crosstalk

Osteocyte, a cell type living within the mineralized bone matrix and connected to each other by means of numerous dendrites, appears to play a major role in body homeostasis. Benefiting from the maturation of osteocyte extraction and culture technique, many cross-sectional studies have been conducted as a subject of intense research in recent years, illustrating the osteocyte-organ/tissue communication not only mechanically but also biochemically. The present review comprehensively evaluates the new research work on the possible crosstalk between osteocyte and closely situated or remote vital organs/tissues. We aim to bring together recent key advances and discuss the mutual effect of osteocyte and brain, kidney, vascular calcification, muscle, liver, adipose tissue, and tumor metastasis and elucidate the therapeutic potential of osteocyte.

Combination of immunotherapy, radiotherapy and denosumab as the best approach even for NSCLC poor prognosis patients: a case report with strong response, prolonged survival and a review of literature

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) with bone metastasis and poor performance status has the worst prognosis even in strong PD-L1 expression patients. Treatment approach includes immuno- or chemo-immunotherapy, Radiotherapy (RT) and Bone-Targeted Therapy (BTT) but there is insufficient data to suggest the best time to use each of them, alone or in combination. Using an integrated and synergistic treatment strategy with immunotherapy, radiotherapy, and Denosumab as BTT is probably the best treatment planning for metastatic NSCLC for both good and poor performance status patients, although more data are needed to confirm this approach. Here we describe an interesting case report on patient with extensive bone involvement from NSCLC and PS >2 treated simultaneously with radiotherapy, immunotherapy and BTT, achieving an excellent clinical benefit, radiological and metabolic complete response, as a sort of Lazarus effect. We analyzed our result comparing with currently published data about radio-immunotherapy or immunotherapy and BTT combination even though there is no published experience about integration of all 3 treatments. Approval studies often do not represent real-world experience (RWE), so we analyzed data from both RWE and clinical trials.

Trabecular bone deterioration in a postmenopausal female suffering multiple spontaneous vertebral fractures due to a delayed denosumab injection - A post-treatment re-initiation bone biopsy-based case study

Background

Denosumab, is a potent anti-resorptive that, increases bone mineral density, and reduces fracture risk in osteoporotic patients. However, several case studies have reported multiple vertebral fractures in patients discontinuing denosumab.

Case presentation

This case report describes a 64-year-old female with postmenopausal osteoporosis treated with denosumab, who had her 11th injection delayed by 4 months. The patient suffered eight spontaneous vertebral fractures. After consent, an iliac crest bone biopsy was obtained following re-initiation of the denosumab treatment and analyzed by micro-computed tomography and histomorphometry.

Results

micro-computed tomography analysis revealed a low trabecular bone volume of 10 %, a low trabecular thickness of 97 μm, a low trabecular spacing of 546 μm, a high trabecular number of 1.8/mm, and a high structure model index of 2.2, suggesting trabecular thinning and loss of trabecular plates. Histomorphometric trabecular bone analysis revealed an eroded perimeter per bone perimeter of 33 % and an osteoid perimeter per bone perimeter of 62 %. Importantly, 88 % of the osteoid perimeter was immediately above an eroded-scalloped cement line with no sign of mineralization, and often with no clear bone-forming osteoblasts on the surface. Moreover, only 5 % of the bone perimeter was mineralizing, reflecting that only 8 % of the osteoid perimeter underwent mineralization, resulting in a mineralization lag time of 545 days. Taken together, this indicates limited bone formation and delayed mineralization.

Conclusion

We present a case report of multiple vertebral fractures after denosumab discontinuation with histomorphometric evidence that denosumab discontinuation leads to extensive trabecular bone resorption followed by a limited bone formation and delayed mineralization if the denosumab treatment is reinitiated. This highlights the importance of developing optimal discontinuation strategies for patients that are to discontinue treatment.

Micropetrosis: Osteocyte Lacunar Mineralization in Aging and Disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

As the importance of osteocytes for bone mineral homeostasis is increasingly recognized, there is growing interest in osteocyte cell death as a relevant indicator in various physiological and pathological conditions. Micropetrosis is an established term used to describe osteocyte lacunae that are filled with minerals following osteocyte death. While the early reports of micropetrosis were purely descriptive, there is now an increasing body of literature showing quantitative data on micropetrosis in various conditions such as aging, osteoporosis, immobilization, and diabetes, and in osteoporosis treatment (denosumab and bisphosphonates). This review summarizes quantitative findings on micropetrosis, with a particular emphasis on the recent advances in the field.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is growing evidence that micropetrosis is more common in older, osteoporotic, and immobilized individuals, as well as in individuals with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Denosumab and bisphosphonates seem to affect lacunar mineralization differently, where specifically bisphosphonates have been shown to prolong osteocyte viability and reduce micropetrosis. Despite continuous proceedings in the field of osteocyte-lacunar-network characteristics, more studies are necessary to further clarify the mechanisms of lacunar mineralization, the inter-site variability of micropetrosis accumulation, the relevance of micropetrosis in various diseases and conditions, and whether micropetrosis could be an indicator of bone fragility or a target for treatment.

Reduced osteoprotegerin expression by osteocytes may contribute to rebound resorption after denosumab discontinuation

Denosumab is an anti-RANKL Ab that potently suppresses bone resorption, increases bone mass, and reduces fracture risk. Discontinuation of denosumab causes rapid rebound bone resorption and bone loss, but the molecular mechanisms are unclear. We generated humanized RANKL mice and treated them with denosumab to examine the cellular and molecular conditions associated with rebound resorption. Denosumab potently suppressed both osteoclast and osteoblast numbers in cancellous bone in humanized RANKL mice. The decrease in osteoclast number was not associated with changes in osteoclast progenitors in bone marrow. Long-term, but not short-term, denosumab administration reduced osteoprotegerin (OPG) mRNA in bone. Localization of OPG expression revealed that OPG mRNA is produced by a subpopulation of osteocytes. Long-term denosumab administration reduced osteocyte OPG mRNA, suggesting that OPG expression declines as osteocytes age. Consistent with this, osteocyte expression of OPG was more prevalent near the surface of cortical bone in humans and mice. These results suggest that new osteocytes are an important source of OPG in remodeling bone and that suppression of remodeling reduces OPG abundance by reducing new osteocyte formation. The lack of new osteocytes and the OPG they produce may contribute to rebound resorption after denosumab discontinuation.

Similarities and Differences in the Management of Patients with Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures and Those with Rebound-Associated Vertebral Fractures Following Discontinuation of Denosumab

Rebound-associated vertebral fractures (RVFx) following denosumab discontinuation are typically multiple, are commonly associated with acute sharp pain, increase the risk of imminent fractures, and are pathogenetically different from common osteoporotic vertebral fractures (VFx). A clinically relevant question is whether patients with RVFx should be managed differently from patients with osteoporotic VFx. To address this question, we performed a systematic search of the PubMed database, and we reviewed current evidence on the optimal management of patients with RVFx. For pain relief of patients with RVFx, potent analgesics, often opioids, are essential. Information on the effectiveness of braces in these patients is scarce. Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty are strongly contraindicated as they confer a substantial risk for new VFx. Exercise may be helpful, but again evidence is lacking. In contrast to patients with osteoporotic VFx, in whom initial treatment with bone-forming agents is recommended, patients with RVFx should initiate treatment with potent antiresorptives. To summarize, patients who have sustained RVFx following denosumab discontinuation are at a very high risk for new fractures, especially VFx. The management of such patients requires a multidisciplinary approach that should not be restricted to pain relief and administration of antiosteoporotic medication, but should also include back protection, early mobilization, and appropriate exercise.

Gestione clinica della terapia con Denosumab: in chi, quando e come interromperla

Denosumab (Dmab) è un potente farmaco anti-riassorbitivo impiegato per il trattamento dell’osteoporosi al dosaggio di 60 mg sottocute ogni sei 6 mesi. A differenza dei bisfosfonati (BPs), Dmab non si accumula nella matrice ossea e, in caso di ritardo o interruzione delle somministrazioni, è noto un effetto rebound sul turnover osseo, che si traduce in una rapida perdita di Bone Mineral Density (BMD) e in un aumento del rischio di fratture vertebrali, spesso cliniche e multiple. Data la rilevanza clinica di tale fenomeno, si rende quindi necessario per gli specialisti dedicati al trattamento delle patologie osteometaboliche conoscere nel dettaglio quali sono le evidenze attualmente disponibili, nonché le principali raccomandazioni relative alla gestione della terapia anti-osteoporotica con Dmab, con particolare attenzione alla sua interruzione (programmata o accidentale), su cui si focalizzerà la presente Rassegna.

Denosumab Discontinuation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the pathophysiology, the clinical consequences as well as way of mitigating the effects of denosumab discontinuation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Treatment with denosumab (DMAB) is reversible and upon discontinuation there is a rapid increase in bone turnover and a subsequent bone loss. During this phase of high bone turnover, an increased risk of fractures has been reported. Therefore, treatment with DMAB could be considered life-long. However, side-effects may prompt the need for discontinuation and moreover, treatment with DMAB may have increased BMD to levels where continuing treatment does not provide further fracture risk reduction. Patients stopping DMAB should be offered subsequent antiresorptive treatment with an intense monitoring regimen during the initial year as most of the bone loss occurs within these initial 12 months. In this review, we evaluated the literature published over the past 1 to 3 years investigating DMAB withdrawal with focus on bone turnover markers, bone mineral density, and fracture risk and the transition to other anti-osteoporosis therapies. Furthermore, we summarized the current recommendations of international guidelines. In this review, we evaluated the literature published over the past 1 to 3 years investigating denosumab (DMAB) discontinuation and the transition to other anti-osteoporosis therapies. Additionally, we summarized the current recommendations of international guidelines.

Osteoclast Recycling and the Rebound Phenomenon Following Denosumab Discontinuation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Inhibition of receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL) with denosumab is an effective treatment in a number of conditions including osteoporosis where suppression of bone resorption is desired. However, denosumab discontinuation is associated with rebound increase in bone resorption and subsequent loss in bone mass and a rapid return to baseline fracture risk. We review recent data on the rebound increase in bone resorption following denosumab discontinuation and the potential mechanisms behind this phenomenon.

RECENT FINDINGS

Osteoclasts have been considered to be highly specialised cells that undergo apoptosis after fulfilling their function of bone resorption. However, recent studies suggest that osteoclasts are longer lived cells which migrate through vasculature and are capable of undergoing fission into a novel cell type (the osteomorph) and re-fusion in a process termed osteoclast recycling. The life cycle of the osteoclast is more complex than previously appreciated. Osteoclast recycling provides a novel mechanistic framework to examine changes in osteoclast biology in response to treatment of bone diseases and provides an exciting new avenue towards personalised medicine.

Clinical Data for Parametrization of In Silico Bone Models Incorporating Cell-Cytokine Dynamics: A Systematic Review of Literature

In silico simulations aim to provide fast, inexpensive, and ethical alternatives to years of costly experimentation on animals and humans for studying bone remodeling, its deregulation during osteoporosis and the effect of therapeutics. Within the varied spectrum of in silico modeling techniques, bone cell population dynamics and agent-based multiphysics simulations have recently emerged as useful tools to simulate the effect of specific signaling pathways. In these models, parameters for cell and cytokine behavior are set based on experimental values found in literature; however, their use is currently limited by the lack of clinical in vivo data on cell numbers and their behavior as well as cytokine concentrations, diffusion, decay and reaction rates. Further, the settings used for these parameters vary across research groups, prohibiting effective cross-comparisons. This review summarizes and evaluates the clinical trial literature that can serve as input or validation for in silico models of bone remodeling incorporating cells and cytokine dynamics in post-menopausal women in treatment, and control scenarios. The GRADE system was used to determine the level of confidence in the reported data, and areas lacking in reported measures such as binding site occupancy, reaction rates and cell proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis rates were highlighted as targets for further research. We propose a consensus for the range of values that can be used for the cell and cytokine settings related to the RANKL-RANK-OPG, TGF-β and sclerostin pathways and a Levels of Evidence-based method to estimate parameters missing from clinical trial literature.

Bone Mineral and Organic Properties in Postmenopausal Women Treated With Denosumab for Up to 10 years

In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, denosumab (DMAb) therapy through 10 years resulted in significantly higher degree of mineralization of bone, with a subsequent increase from years 2-3 to year 5 and no further difference between years 5 and 10. Our aim was to assess the variables reflecting the quality of bone mineral and organic matrix (Fourier transform infrared microspectroscopy), and the microhardness of bone (Vickers microindentation). Cross-sectional assessments were performed in blinded fashion on iliac bone biopsies from osteoporotic women (72 from FREEDOM trial, 49 from FREEDOM Extension trial), separately in cortical and cancellous compartments. After 2-3 years of DMAb, mineral/matrix ratio and microhardness of cortical bone were significantly higher compared with placebo, whereas mineral maturity, mineral crystallinity, mineral carbonation, and collagen maturity were not different in both bone compartments. Through 5 years of DMAb, mineral carbonation was significantly lower and mineral/matrix ratio, mineral maturity, and crystallinity were significantly higher versus 2-3 years and were not different between 5 and 10 years, with the exception of mineral maturity in cancellous bone. These data support a transition of mineral to more mature crystals (within physiological range) and the completeness of secondary mineralization within 5 years of DMAb treatment. Microhardness in cortical and cancellous compartments was significantly lower at 5 years of DMAb versus 2-3 years and was not different from years 5 to 10. The lower microhardness at years 5 and 10 is likely the result of maturation of the organic matrix in a persistently low state of bone remodeling over 5 and 10 years. © 2022 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

The Efficacy of Denosumab in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of Randomized or Matched Data

Objective

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of denosumab treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods

The Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant clinical studies. Studies that assessed the efficacy of denosumab in patients with RA were identified. The primary endpoints were the percent changes in bone mineral density (BMD), and the changes in modified total Sharp score (mTSS), modified Sharp erosion score and joint space narrowing (JSN) score. Pooled analyses were calculated using random-effect models.

Results

After searching the literature and performing further detailed assessments, 10 studies with a total of 1758 patients were included in the quantitative analysis. Pooled analyses showed that denosumab treatment significantly increased the percent changes in lumbar spine BMD [mean difference (MD): 5.12, confidence intervals (CI): 4.15 to 6.09], total hip BMD (MD: 2.72, 95% CI: 1.80 to 3.64) and femoral neck BMD (MD: 2.20, 95% CI: 0.94 to 3.46) compared with controls. Moreover, denosumab treatment significantly decreased the changes in mTSS (MD: -0.63, 95% CI: -0.86 to -0.41) and modified Sharp erosion score (MD: -0.62, 95% CI: -0.88 to -0.35). Subgroup analysis indicated that denosumab was superior to bisphosphonates for the improvement of BMD and the mitigation of joint destruction.

Conclusion

Denosumab treatment was associated with increased BMD and alleviated progression of joint destruction in RA patients, even when compared with bisphosphonates.

Poor bone matrix quality: What can be done about it?

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

Bone's ability to withstand load resisting fracture and adapting to it highly depends on the quality of its matrix and its regulators. This review focuses on the contribution of bone quality to fracture resistance and possible therapeutic targets for skeletal fragility in aging and disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

The highly organized, hierarchical composite structure of bone extracellular matrix together with its (re)modeling mechanisms and microdamage dynamics determines its stiffness, strength, and toughness. Aging and disease affect the biological processes regulating bone quality, thus resulting in defective extracellular matrix and bone fragility. Targeted therapies are being developed to restore bone's mechanical integrity. However, their current limitations include low tissue selectivity and adverse side effects. Biological and mechanical insights into the mechanisms controlling bone quality, together with advances in drug delivery and studies in animal models, will accelerate the development and translation to clinical application of effective targeted-therapeutics for bone fragility.

Importance of bone turnover for therapeutic decisions in patients with CKD-MBD

Patients with chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD) frequently have low bone formation rates. A recent review suggested that adynamic bone disease is not always associated with negative outcomes and therefore antiresorptive medications could be used more often. However, there is currently no evidence to support an improvement in fracture risk or mortality in patients with CKD-MBD and low bone turnover who are treated with antiresorptive medication. There is reasonable pathophysiological evidence suggesting that it may even be harmful.

Denosumab Discontinuation and the Rebound Phenomenon: A Narrative Review

Denosumab is a potent antiresorptive agent that substantially increases bone mineral density and reduces fracture rates at all skeletal sites for as long as it is administered. However, its favorable skeletal effects reverse quickly upon its discontinuation, because of a vast increase of osteoclast number and activity, which leads to a subsequent profound increase of bone turnover above pre-treatment values, a phenomenon commonly described as “rebound phenomenon”. More importantly, most patients experience rapid, profound bone loss due to this burst of bone resorption that may lead in a minority of these patients to occurrence of fractures, especially multiple vertebral fractures. Therefore, subsequent antiresorptive treatment is mandatory, although the optimal regimen is yet to be clarified. In the present review, we outline what is currently known regarding the negative effects of denosumab discontinuation on different aspects of bone status, the factors that may affect them, and strategies to prevent them.

Fracture risk and management of discontinuation of denosumab therapy: a systematic review and position statement by ECTS

CONTEXT

Denosumab discontinuation is characterized by an increase in bone turnover overriding pre-treatment status, a rapid bone loss in the majority and multiple vertebral fractures (VFx) in some patients.

METHODS

A working group of the European Calcified Tissue Society (ECTS) performed an updated systematic review of existing literature on changes of bone turnover, bone mineral density (BMD), and fracture risk after denosumab discontinuation and provided advice on management based on expert opinion.

RESULTS

Important risk factors for multiple VFx following denosumab cessation are prevalent VFx, longer duration off therapy, greater gain in hip BMD during therapy, and greater loss of hip BMD after therapy according to a retrospective analysis of the FREEDOM Extension Study. Case series indicate that prior bisphosphonate therapy mitigates the biochemical rebound phenomenon after denosumab discontinuation, but it is uncertain whether this attenuation prevents BMD loss and fractures. Current evidence indicates partial efficacy of subsequent antiresorptive treatment with results seemingly dependent on duration of denosumab treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

A careful assessment of indications to start denosumab treatment is advised, especially for younger patients. A case for long-term treatment with denosumab can be made for patients at high fracture risk already on denosumab treatment given the favorable efficacy and safety profile. In case of denosumab discontinuation, alternative antiresorptive treatment should be initiated 6 months after the final denosumab injection. Assessment of bone turnover markers may help define the optimal regimen, pending results of ongoing RCTs. Patients having sustained VFx should be offered prompt treatment to reduce high bone turnover.

A Review on the Role of Denosumab in Fracture Prevention

Denosumab is a receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-Β ligand inhibitor, which suppresses the bone resorption process to preserve bone mass. It is usually recommended to postmenopausal women and men with high fracture risk. With the recent publication of the results from FREEDOM study and its extension, the long-term effect of denosumab in preventing fragility fractures has been put forward. This review aims at summarising the evidence of denosumab in reducing fracture risk and its safety derived from clinical studies. Most of the evidence are derived from FREEDOM trials up to 10 years of exposure. Denosumab is reported to prevent vertebral and non-vertebral fractures. It is also proven effective in Japanese women, patients with chronic kidney diseases and breast cancer patients receiving antineoplastic therapy. Denosumab discontinuation leads to high remodeling, loss of bone mineral density and increased fracture risk. These negative effects might be preventable by bisphosphonate treatment. The safety profile of denosumab is consistent with increased years of exposure. In conclusion, denosumab is a safe and effective option for reducing fracture risk among patients with osteoporosis.