1
|
Neylon J, Ma TM, Savjani R, Low DA, Steinberg ML, Lamb JM, Nickols NG, Kishan AU, Cao M. Quantifying Intrafraction Motion and the Impact of Gating for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Stereotactic Radiation therapy for Prostate Cancer: Analysis of the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Arm From the MIRAGE Phase 3 Randomized Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:1181-1191. [PMID: 38160916 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.12.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Real-time intrafraction tracking/gating is an integral component of magnetic resonance imaging-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) and may have contributed to the acute toxicity reduction during prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy observed on the MRgRT-arm of the MIRAGE (MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING-GUIDED Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer) randomized trial (NCT04384770). Herein we characterized intrafraction prostate motion and assessed gating effectiveness. METHODS AND MATERIALS Seventy-nine patients were treated on an MR-LINAC. Real-time cine imaging was acquired at 4Hz in a sagittal plane. If >10% of the prostate area moved outside of a 3-mm gating boundary, an automatic beam hold was initiated. An in-house tool was developed to retrospectively extract gating signal for all patients and identify the tracked prostate in each cine frame for a subgroup of 40 patients. The fraction of time the prostate was within the gating window was defined as the gating duty cycle (GDC). RESULTS A total of 391 treatments from 79 patients were analyzed. Median GDC was 0.974 (IQR, 0.916-0.983). Fifty (63.2%) and 24 (30.4%) patients had at least 1 fraction with GDC ≤0.9 and GDC ≤0.8, respectively. Incidence of low GDC fractions among patients appeared stochastic. Patients with minimum GDC <0.8 trended toward more frequent grade 2 genitourinary toxicity compared with those with minimum GDC >0.8 (38% vs 18%, P = .065). Prostate intrafraction motion was mostly along the bladder-rectum axis and predominantly in the superior-anterior direction. Motion in the inferior-posterior direction was associated with significantly higher rate of acute grade 2 genitourinary toxicity (66.7% vs 13.9%, P = .001). Gating limited mean prostate motion during treatment delivery in fractions with a GDC <0.9 (<0.8) to 2.9 mm (2.9 mm) versus 4.1 mm (4.7 mm) for ungated motion. CONCLUSIONS Fractions with large intrafraction motion were associated with increased toxicity and their occurrence among patients appears stochastic. Real-time tracking/gating effectively mitigated this motion and is likely a major contributing factor of acute toxicity reduction associated with MRgRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack Neylon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California.
| | - Ting Martin Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Ricky Savjani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Daniel A Low
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Michael L Steinberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - James M Lamb
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Nicholas G Nickols
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Amar U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Minsong Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
van den Dobbelsteen M, Hackett SL, van Asselen B, Oolbekkink S, Raaymakers BW, de Boer JC. Treatment planning evaluation and experimental validation of the magnetic resonance-based intrafraction drift correction. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 30:100580. [PMID: 38707627 PMCID: PMC11068926 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2024] [Revised: 04/17/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose MRI-guided online adaptive treatments can account for interfractional variations, however intrafraction motion reduces treatment accuracy. Intrafraction plan adaptation methods, such as the Intrafraction Drift Correction (IDC) or sub-fractionation, are needed. IDC uses real-time automatic monitoring of the tumor position to initiate plan adaptations by repositioning segments. IDC is a fast adaptation method that occurs only when necessary and this method could enable margin reduction. This research provides a treatment planning evaluation and experimental validation of the IDC. Materials and methods An in silico treatment planning evaluation was performed for 13 prostate patients mid-treatment without and with intrafraction plan adaptation (IDC and sub-fractionation). The adaptation methods were evaluated using dose volume histogram (DVH) metrics. To experimentally verify IDC a treatment was mimicked whereby a motion phantom containing an EBT3 film moved mid-treatment, followed by repositioning of segments. In addition, the delivered treatment was irradiated on a diode array phantom for plan quality assurance purposes. Results The planning study showed benefits for using intrafraction adaptation methods relative to no adaptation, where the IDC and sub-fractionation showed consistently improved target coverage with median target coverages of 100.0%. The experimental results verified the IDC with high minimum gamma passing rates of 99.1% and small mean dose deviations of maximum 0.3%. Conclusion The straightforward and fast IDC technique showed DVH metrics consistent with the sub-fractionation method using segment weight re-optimization for prostate patients. The dosimetric and geometric accuracy was shown for a full IDC workflow using film and diode array dosimetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madelon van den Dobbelsteen
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sara L. Hackett
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bram van Asselen
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Stijn Oolbekkink
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bas W. Raaymakers
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes C.J. de Boer
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ma TM, Ladbury C, Tran M, Keiper TD, Andraos T, Gogineni E, Mohideen N, Siva S, Loblaw A, Tree AC, Cheung P, Kresl J, Collins S, Cao M, Kishan AU. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: A Radiosurgery Society Guide to the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer Illustrated by Challenging Cases. Pract Radiat Oncol 2024; 14:e117-e131. [PMID: 37661040 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2023.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Revised: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
Traditionally, external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for localized prostate cancer (PCa) involved lengthy courses with low daily doses. However, advancements in radiation delivery and a better understanding of prostate radiobiology have enabled the development of shorter courses of EBRT. Ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy, administering doses greater than 5 Gy per fraction, is now considered a standard of care regimen for localized PCa, particularly for intermediate-risk disease. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), a specific type of ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy employing advanced planning, imaging, and treatment technology to deliver in five or fewer fractions, is gaining prominence as a cost-effective, convenient, and safe alternative to longer radiotherapy courses. It is crucial to address practical considerations related to patient selection, fractionation scheme, target delineation, and planning objectives. This is especially important in challenging clinical situations where clear evidence for guidance may be lacking. The Radiosurgery Society endorses this case-based guide with the aim of providing a practical framework for delivering SBRT to the intact prostate, exemplified by two case studies. The article will explore common SBRT dose/fractionation schemes and dose constraints for organs-at-risk. Additionally, it will review existing evidence and expert opinions on topics such as SBRT dose escalation, the use of rectal spacers, the role of androgen deprivation therapy in the context of SBRT, SBRT in special patient populations (e.g., high-risk disease, large prostate, high baseline urinary symptom burdens, and inflammatory bowel disease), as well as new imaging-guidance techniques like Magnetic Resonance Imaging for SBRT delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ting Martin Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Colton Ladbury
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, California
| | - Maxwell Tran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Timothy D Keiper
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Therese Andraos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Emile Gogineni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Najeeb Mohideen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwest Community Hospital, Arlington Heights, Illinois
| | - Shankar Siva
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Andrew Loblaw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alison C Tree
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Patrick Cheung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - John Kresl
- Phoenix CyberKnife and Radiation Oncology Center, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Sean Collins
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, D.C
| | - Minsong Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Amar U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; Department of Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Oar B, Brown A, Newman G, Boles A, Rumley CN, Doyle R, Baines J, Tan A. Improvement in male pelvis magnetic resonance image contouring following radiologist-delivered training. J Med Radiat Sci 2024; 71:114-122. [PMID: 37740640 PMCID: PMC10920942 DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/24/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The magnetic resonance linear accelerator (MRL) combines both magnetic resonance imaging and a linear accelerator, allowing for daily treatment adaptation. This study aimed to assess the impact of radiologist-delivered training in magnetic resonance (MR) contouring of relevant structures within the male pelvis. METHODS Two radiation oncologists, two radiation oncology registrars and seven radiation therapists completed contouring on 10 male pelvis MR datasets both pre- and post-training. A 2-hour MR anatomy training session was delivered by a radiologist, who also provided the 'gold standard' contours. The pre- and post-training contours were compared against the gold standard with Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distances calculated; and the pre- and post-confidence scores and timing were compared. RESULTS The improvement in DSC were significant in prostate, rectum and seminal vesicles, with a post-training median DSC of 0.87 ± 0.06, 0.92 ± 0.04 and 0.80 ± 0.14, respectively. The median Hausdorff improved with a median of 1.46 ± 0.78 mm, 0.52 ± 0.32 mm and 1.11 ± 0.86 mm for prostate, rectum and seminal vesicles, respectively. Bladder concordance was high both pre- and post-training. Urethra contours improved post-training, however, remained difficult to contour with a median post-DSC of 0.51 ± 0.24. Overall, confidence scoring improved (P < 0.001) and timing decreased by an average of 4.4 ± 16.4 min post-training. CONCLUSION Radiologist-delivered training improved concordance of male pelvis contouring on MR datasets. Further work is required in the identification of urethra on MRs. These findings are of importance in the MRL adaptive workflow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bronwyn Oar
- Townsville University HospitalTownsvilleQueenslandAustralia
| | - Amy Brown
- Townsville University HospitalTownsvilleQueenslandAustralia
- Queensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
- James Cook UniversityTownsvilleQueenslandAustralia
| | - Glen Newman
- Townsville University HospitalTownsvilleQueenslandAustralia
| | - Alan Boles
- Queensland XRayTownsvilleQueenslandAustralia
| | - Christopher N. Rumley
- Townsville University HospitalTownsvilleQueenslandAustralia
- James Cook UniversityTownsvilleQueenslandAustralia
| | - Rachel Doyle
- Townsville University HospitalTownsvilleQueenslandAustralia
| | - John Baines
- Townsville University HospitalTownsvilleQueenslandAustralia
- James Cook UniversityTownsvilleQueenslandAustralia
| | - Alex Tan
- Townsville University HospitalTownsvilleQueenslandAustralia
- James Cook UniversityTownsvilleQueenslandAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Xiong Y, Rabe M, Rippke C, Kawula M, Nierer L, Klüter S, Belka C, Niyazi M, Hörner-Rieber J, Corradini S, Landry G, Kurz C. Impact of daily plan adaptation on accumulated doses in ultra-hypofractionated magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy of prostate cancer. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 29:100562. [PMID: 38463219 PMCID: PMC10924058 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Revised: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Ultra-hypofractionated online adaptive magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) is promising for prostate cancer. However, the impact of online adaptation on target coverage and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing at the level of accumulated dose has not yet been reported. Using deformable image registration (DIR)-based accumulation, we compared the delivered adapted dose with the simulated non-adapted dose. Materials and methods Twenty-three prostate cancer patients treated at two clinics with 0.35 T magnetic resonance-guided linear accelerator (MR-linac) following the same treatment protocol (5 × 7.5 Gy with urethral sparing and daily adaptation) were included. The fraction MR images were deformably registered to the planning MR image. Both non-adapted and adapted fraction doses were accumulated with the corresponding vector fields. Two DIR approaches were implemented. PTV* (planning target volume minus urethra+2mm) D95%, CTV* (clinical target volume minus urethra) D98%, and OARs (urethra+2mm, bladder, and rectum) D0.2cc, were evaluated. Statistical significance was inferred from a two-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank test (p < 0.05). Results Normalized to the baseline, the accumulated PTV* D95% increased significantly by 2.7 % ([1.5, 4.3]%) through adaptation, and the CTV* D98% by 1.2 % ([0.1, 1.7]%). For the OARs after adaptation, accumulated bladder D0.2cc decreased by 0.4 % ([-1.2, 0.4]%), urethra+2mmD0.2cc by 0.8 % ([-1.6, -0.1]%), while rectum D0.2cc increased by 2.6 % ([1.2, 4.9]%). For all patients, rectum D0.2cc was still below the clinical constraint. Results of both DIR approaches differed on average by less than 0.2 %. Conclusions Online adaptation in MRgRT improved target coverage and OARs sparing at the level of accumulated dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuqing Xiong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Moritz Rabe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Carolin Rippke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maria Kawula
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lukas Nierer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sebastian Klüter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner site Munich, a Partnership between DKFZ and LMU University Hospital Munich, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Guillaume Landry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christopher Kurz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kim J, Sung J, Lee SJ, Cho KS, Chung BH, Yang D, Kim J, Kim JW. Optimal planning target margin for prostate radiotherapy based on interfractional and intrafractional variability assessment during 1.5T MRI-guided radiotherapy. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1337626. [PMID: 38173837 PMCID: PMC10761547 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1337626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction We analyzed daily pre-treatment- (PRE) and real-time motion monitoring- (MM) MRI scans of patients receiving definitive prostate radiotherapy (RT) with 1.5 T MRI guidance to assess interfractional and intrafractional variability of the prostate and suggest optimal planning target volume (PTV) margin. Materials and methods Rigid registration between PRE-MRI and planning CT images based on the pelvic bone and prostate anatomy were performed. Interfractional setup margin (SM) and interobserver variability (IO) were assessed by comparing the centroid values of prostate contours delineated on PRE-MRIs. MM-MRIs were used for internal margin (IM) assessment, and PTV margin was calculated using the van Herk formula. Results We delineated 400 prostate contours on PRE-MRI images. SM was 0.57 ± 0.42, 2.45 ± 1.98, and 2.28 ± 2.08 mm in the left-right (LR), anterior-posterior (AP), and superior-inferior (SI) directions, respectively, after bone localization and 0.76 ± 0.57, 1.89 ± 1.60, and 2.02 ± 1.79 mm in the LR, AP, and SI directions, respectively, after prostate localization. IO was 1.06 ± 0.58, 2.32 ± 1.08, and 3.30 ± 1.85 mm in the LR, AP, and SI directions, respectively, after bone localization and 1.11 ± 0.55, 2.13 ± 1.07, and 3.53 ± 1.65 mm in the LR, AP, and SI directions, respectively, after prostate localization. Average IM was 2.12 ± 0.86, 2.24 ± 1.07, and 2.84 ± 0.88 mm in the LR, AP, and SI directions, respectively. Calculated PTV margin was 2.21, 5.16, and 5.40 mm in the LR, AP, and SI directions, respectively. Conclusions Movements in the SI direction were the largest source of variability in definitive prostate RT, and interobserver variability was a non-negligible source of margin. The optimal PTV margin should also consider the internal margin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jina Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jiwon Sung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seo Jin Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kang Su Cho
- Department of Urology, Prostate Cancer Center, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Byung Ha Chung
- Department of Urology, Prostate Cancer Center, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Dongjoon Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jihun Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jun Won Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wu JK, Lee TY, Yu MC, Kuo MC, Chen WC, Hsiao YC, Wang YJ. Developing a novel quasi-3D movable water phantom for radiation therapy workable in the magnetic resonance environment. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2023; 13:7731-7740. [PMID: 38106241 PMCID: PMC10722017 DOI: 10.21037/qims-23-189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
Background The use of magnetic resonance linear accelerators (MR-LINACs) for clinical treatment has opened up new possibilities and challenges in the field of radiation oncology. However, annual quality assurance (QA) is relatively understudied due to practical considerations. Thus, to overcome the difficulty of measuring the dose with a small water phantom for TRS-398 or TG-51 in all external beam radiation treatment unit environments, such as MR compatibility, we designed a remote phantom with a three-axis changeable capacity for QA. Methods The designed water phantom was tested under an MR environment. The water phantom system comprised of three parts: a phantom box, a dose measurement tool, and a PMD401 drive system. The UNIDOSE universal dosimeter was used to collect beam data. The manufacturer's developer tools were utilized to position the measurement. To ensure magnetic field homogeneity, a distortion phantom was prepared using sixty fish oil capsules aligned radially to distinguish the oil and free air. The phantom was scanned in both the MR simulator and computed tomography (CT), and the acquired images were analyzed to determine the position shift. Results The dimensions of the device are 30 cm in the X-axis, 20 cm in the Y-axis, and 17 cm in the Z-axis. Total cost of materials was no more than $10,000 US dollars. Our results indicate that the device can function normally in a regular 1.5 T MR environment without interference from the magnetic field. The water phantom's traveling speed was found to be approximately 5 mm/s with a position difference confined within 6 cm intervals during normal use. The distortion test results showed that the prepared MR environment has uniform magnetic field homogeneity. Conclusions In this study, we constructed a prototype water phantom device that can function in an MR simulator without interference between the magnetic field and electronic components. Compared to other commercially available MR-LINAC water phantoms, our device offers a more cost-effective solution for routine monthly QA. It can shorten the duration of QA tests and relieve the burden on medical physicists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian-Kuen Wu
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Departments of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei
| | - Ting-Yen Lee
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei
| | - Min-Chin Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei
| | - Ming-Chih Kuo
- Department of Medical Imaging, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei
| | - Wei-Chuan Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, China Medical University Beigang Hospital, Yunlin
| | - Yi-Cheng Hsiao
- Department of Medical Imaging, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei
| | - Yu-Jen Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fu Jen Catholic University Hospital, New Taipei City
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zhong J, Kobus M, Maitre P, Datta A, Eccles C, Dubec M, McHugh D, Buckley D, Scarsbrook A, Hoskin P, Henry A, Choudhury A. MRI-guided Pelvic Radiation Therapy: A Primer for Radiologists. Radiographics 2023; 43:e230052. [PMID: 37796729 DOI: 10.1148/rg.230052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT) is a core pillar of oncologic treatment, and half of all patients with cancer receive this therapy as a curative or palliative treatment. The recent integration of MRI into the RT workflow has led to the advent of MRI-guided RT (MRIgRT). Using MRI rather than CT has clear advantages for guiding RT to pelvic tumors, including superior soft-tissue contrast, improved organ motion visualization, and the potential to image tumor phenotypic characteristics to identify the most aggressive or treatment-resistant areas, which can be targeted with a more focal higher radiation dose. Radiologists should be familiar with the potential uses of MRI in planning pelvic RT; the various RT techniques used, such as brachytherapy and external beam RT; and the impact of MRIgRT on treatment paradigms. Current clinical experience with and the evidence base for MRIgRT in the settings of prostate, cervical, and bladder cancer are discussed, and examples of treated cases are illustrated. In addition, the benefits of MRIgRT, such as real-time online adaptation of RT (during treatment) and interfraction and/or intrafraction adaptation to organ motion, as well as how MRIgRT can decrease toxic effects and improve oncologic outcomes, are highlighted. MRIgRT is particularly beneficial for treating mobile pelvic structures, and real-time adaptive RT for tumors can be achieved by using advanced MRI-guided linear accelerator systems to spare organs at risk. Future opportunities for development of biologically driven adapted RT with use of functional MRI sequences and radiogenomic approaches also are outlined. ©RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jim Zhong
- From the Leeds Institute of Medical Research (J.Z., A.S., A.H.) and Department of Biomedical Imaging (D.B.), University of Leeds, 6 Clarendon Way, Woodhouse, Leeds LS2 9LH, England; Leeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, England (J.Z., A.S., A.H.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany (M.K.); Radiation Therapy Research Group (M.K., P.M., A.D., C.E., M.D., P.H., A.C.) and Division of Cancer Sciences (D.M.), University of Manchester, Manchester, England; and The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England (P.M., C.E., M.D., D.M., P.H., A.C.)
| | - Marta Kobus
- From the Leeds Institute of Medical Research (J.Z., A.S., A.H.) and Department of Biomedical Imaging (D.B.), University of Leeds, 6 Clarendon Way, Woodhouse, Leeds LS2 9LH, England; Leeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, England (J.Z., A.S., A.H.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany (M.K.); Radiation Therapy Research Group (M.K., P.M., A.D., C.E., M.D., P.H., A.C.) and Division of Cancer Sciences (D.M.), University of Manchester, Manchester, England; and The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England (P.M., C.E., M.D., D.M., P.H., A.C.)
| | - Priyamvada Maitre
- From the Leeds Institute of Medical Research (J.Z., A.S., A.H.) and Department of Biomedical Imaging (D.B.), University of Leeds, 6 Clarendon Way, Woodhouse, Leeds LS2 9LH, England; Leeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, England (J.Z., A.S., A.H.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany (M.K.); Radiation Therapy Research Group (M.K., P.M., A.D., C.E., M.D., P.H., A.C.) and Division of Cancer Sciences (D.M.), University of Manchester, Manchester, England; and The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England (P.M., C.E., M.D., D.M., P.H., A.C.)
| | - Anubhav Datta
- From the Leeds Institute of Medical Research (J.Z., A.S., A.H.) and Department of Biomedical Imaging (D.B.), University of Leeds, 6 Clarendon Way, Woodhouse, Leeds LS2 9LH, England; Leeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, England (J.Z., A.S., A.H.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany (M.K.); Radiation Therapy Research Group (M.K., P.M., A.D., C.E., M.D., P.H., A.C.) and Division of Cancer Sciences (D.M.), University of Manchester, Manchester, England; and The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England (P.M., C.E., M.D., D.M., P.H., A.C.)
| | - Cynthia Eccles
- From the Leeds Institute of Medical Research (J.Z., A.S., A.H.) and Department of Biomedical Imaging (D.B.), University of Leeds, 6 Clarendon Way, Woodhouse, Leeds LS2 9LH, England; Leeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, England (J.Z., A.S., A.H.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany (M.K.); Radiation Therapy Research Group (M.K., P.M., A.D., C.E., M.D., P.H., A.C.) and Division of Cancer Sciences (D.M.), University of Manchester, Manchester, England; and The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England (P.M., C.E., M.D., D.M., P.H., A.C.)
| | - Michael Dubec
- From the Leeds Institute of Medical Research (J.Z., A.S., A.H.) and Department of Biomedical Imaging (D.B.), University of Leeds, 6 Clarendon Way, Woodhouse, Leeds LS2 9LH, England; Leeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, England (J.Z., A.S., A.H.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany (M.K.); Radiation Therapy Research Group (M.K., P.M., A.D., C.E., M.D., P.H., A.C.) and Division of Cancer Sciences (D.M.), University of Manchester, Manchester, England; and The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England (P.M., C.E., M.D., D.M., P.H., A.C.)
| | - Damien McHugh
- From the Leeds Institute of Medical Research (J.Z., A.S., A.H.) and Department of Biomedical Imaging (D.B.), University of Leeds, 6 Clarendon Way, Woodhouse, Leeds LS2 9LH, England; Leeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, England (J.Z., A.S., A.H.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany (M.K.); Radiation Therapy Research Group (M.K., P.M., A.D., C.E., M.D., P.H., A.C.) and Division of Cancer Sciences (D.M.), University of Manchester, Manchester, England; and The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England (P.M., C.E., M.D., D.M., P.H., A.C.)
| | - David Buckley
- From the Leeds Institute of Medical Research (J.Z., A.S., A.H.) and Department of Biomedical Imaging (D.B.), University of Leeds, 6 Clarendon Way, Woodhouse, Leeds LS2 9LH, England; Leeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, England (J.Z., A.S., A.H.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany (M.K.); Radiation Therapy Research Group (M.K., P.M., A.D., C.E., M.D., P.H., A.C.) and Division of Cancer Sciences (D.M.), University of Manchester, Manchester, England; and The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England (P.M., C.E., M.D., D.M., P.H., A.C.)
| | - Andrew Scarsbrook
- From the Leeds Institute of Medical Research (J.Z., A.S., A.H.) and Department of Biomedical Imaging (D.B.), University of Leeds, 6 Clarendon Way, Woodhouse, Leeds LS2 9LH, England; Leeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, England (J.Z., A.S., A.H.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany (M.K.); Radiation Therapy Research Group (M.K., P.M., A.D., C.E., M.D., P.H., A.C.) and Division of Cancer Sciences (D.M.), University of Manchester, Manchester, England; and The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England (P.M., C.E., M.D., D.M., P.H., A.C.)
| | - Peter Hoskin
- From the Leeds Institute of Medical Research (J.Z., A.S., A.H.) and Department of Biomedical Imaging (D.B.), University of Leeds, 6 Clarendon Way, Woodhouse, Leeds LS2 9LH, England; Leeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, England (J.Z., A.S., A.H.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany (M.K.); Radiation Therapy Research Group (M.K., P.M., A.D., C.E., M.D., P.H., A.C.) and Division of Cancer Sciences (D.M.), University of Manchester, Manchester, England; and The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England (P.M., C.E., M.D., D.M., P.H., A.C.)
| | - Ann Henry
- From the Leeds Institute of Medical Research (J.Z., A.S., A.H.) and Department of Biomedical Imaging (D.B.), University of Leeds, 6 Clarendon Way, Woodhouse, Leeds LS2 9LH, England; Leeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, England (J.Z., A.S., A.H.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany (M.K.); Radiation Therapy Research Group (M.K., P.M., A.D., C.E., M.D., P.H., A.C.) and Division of Cancer Sciences (D.M.), University of Manchester, Manchester, England; and The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England (P.M., C.E., M.D., D.M., P.H., A.C.)
| | - Ananya Choudhury
- From the Leeds Institute of Medical Research (J.Z., A.S., A.H.) and Department of Biomedical Imaging (D.B.), University of Leeds, 6 Clarendon Way, Woodhouse, Leeds LS2 9LH, England; Leeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, England (J.Z., A.S., A.H.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany (M.K.); Radiation Therapy Research Group (M.K., P.M., A.D., C.E., M.D., P.H., A.C.) and Division of Cancer Sciences (D.M.), University of Manchester, Manchester, England; and The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England (P.M., C.E., M.D., D.M., P.H., A.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Benitez CM, Steinberg ML, Cao M, Qi XS, Lamb JM, Kishan AU, Valle LF. MRI-Guided Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: The Next Frontier in Ultrahypofractionation. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4657. [PMID: 37760626 PMCID: PMC10526919 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2023] [Revised: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Technological advances in MRI-guided radiation therapy (MRIgRT) have improved real-time visualization of the prostate and its surrounding structures over CT-guided radiation therapy. Seminal studies have demonstrated safe dose escalation achieved through ultrahypofractionation with MRIgRT due to planning target volume (PTV) margin reduction and treatment gating. On-table adaptation with MRI-based technologies can also incorporate real-time changes in target shape and volume and can reduce high doses of radiation to sensitive surrounding structures that may move into the treatment field. Ongoing clinical trials seek to refine ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy treatments for prostate cancer using MRIgRT. Though these studies have the potential to demonstrate improved biochemical control and reduced side effects, limitations concerning patient treatment times and operational workflows may preclude wide adoption of this technology outside of centers of excellence. In this review, we discuss the advantages and limitations of MRIgRT for prostate cancer, as well as clinical trials testing the efficacy and toxicity of ultrafractionation in patients with localized or post-prostatectomy recurrent prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Luca F. Valle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-6951, USA (X.S.Q.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Arumugam S, Young T, Do V, Chlap P, Tawfik C, Udovitch M, Wong K, Sidhom M. Assessment of intrafraction motion and its dosimetric impact on prostate radiotherapy using an in-house developed position monitoring system. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1082391. [PMID: 37519787 PMCID: PMC10375704 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1082391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To implement an in-house developed position monitoring software, SeedTracker, for conventional fractionation prostate radiotherapy, and study the effect on dosimetric impact and intrafraction motion. Methods Thirty definitive prostate radiotherapy patients with implanted fiducial markers were included in the study. All patients were treated with VMAT technique and plans were generated using the Pinnacle planning system using the 6MV beam model for Elekta linear accelerator. The target dose of 60 Gy in 20 fractions was prescribed for 29 of 30 patients, and one patient was treated with the target dose of 78 Gy in 39 fractions. The SeedTracker position monitoring system, which uses the x-ray images acquired during treatment delivery in the Elekta linear accelerator and associated XVI system, was used for online prostate position monitoring. The position tolerance for online verification was progressively reduced from 5 mm, 4 mm, and to 3 mm in 10 patient cohorts to effectively manage the treatment interruptions resulting from intrafraction motion in routine clinical practice. The delivered dose to target volumes and organs at risk in each of the treatment fractions was assessed by incorporating the observed target positions into the original treatment plan. Results In 27 of 30 patients, at least one gating event was observed, with a total of 177 occurrences of position deviation detected in 146 of 619 treatment fractions. In 5 mm, 4 mm, and 3 mm position tolerance cohorts, the position deviations were observed in 13%, 24%, and 33% of treatment fractions, respectively. Overall, the mean (range) deviation of -0.4 (-7.2 to 5.3) mm, -0.9 (-6.1 to 15.6) mm, and -1.7 (-7.0 to 6.1) mm was observed in Left-Right, Anterior-Posterior, and Superior-Inferior directions, respectively. The prostate CTV D99 would have been reduced by a maximum value of 1.3 Gy compared to the planned dose if position deviations were uncorrected, but with corrections, it was 0.3 Gy. Similarly, PTV D98 would have been reduced by a maximum value of 7.6 Gy uncorrected, with this difference reduced to 2.2 Gy with correction. The V60 to the rectum increased by a maximum of 1.0% uncorrected, which was reduced to 0.5%. Conclusion Online target position monitoring for conventional fractionation prostate radiotherapy was successfully implemented on a standard Linear accelerator using an in-house developed position monitoring software, with an improvement in resultant dose to prostate target volume.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sankar Arumugam
- Department of Medical Physics, Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres and Ingham Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- South Western Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Tony Young
- Department of Medical Physics, Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres and Ingham Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Viet Do
- South Western Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Phillip Chlap
- Department of Medical Physics, Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres and Ingham Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- South Western Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Christine Tawfik
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Mark Udovitch
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Karen Wong
- South Western Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Mark Sidhom
- South Western Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dal Bello R, Lapaeva M, La Greca Saint-Esteven A, Wallimann P, Günther M, Konukoglu E, Andratschke N, Guckenberger M, Tanadini-Lang S. Patient-specific quality assurance strategies for synthetic computed tomography in magnetic resonance-only radiotherapy of the abdomen. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023; 27:100464. [PMID: 37497188 PMCID: PMC10366576 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2023.100464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Revised: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose The superior tissue contrast of magnetic resonance (MR) compared to computed tomography (CT) led to an increasing interest towards MR-only radiotherapy. For the latter, the dose calculation should be performed on a synthetic CT (sCT). Patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) methods have not been established yet and this study aimed to assess several software-based solutions. Materials and methods A retrospective study was performed on 20 patients treated at an MR-Linac, which were selected to evenly cover four subcategories: (i) standard, (ii) air pockets, (iii) lung and (iv) implant cases. The neural network (NN) CycleGAN was adopted to generate a reference sCT, which was then compared to four PSQA methods: (A) water override of body, (B) five tissue classes with bulk densities, (C) sCT generated by a separate NN (pix2pix) and (D) deformed CT. Results The evaluation of the dose endpoints demonstrated that while all methods A-D provided statistically equivalent results (p = 0.05) within the 2% level for the standard cases (i), only the methods C-D guaranteed the same result over the whole cohort. The bulk densities override was shown to be a valuable method in absence of lung tissue within the beam path. Conclusion The observations of this study suggested that the use of an additional sCT generated by a separate NN was an appropriate tool to perform PSQA of a sCT in an MR-only workflow at an MR-Linac. The time and dose endpoints requirements were respected, namely within 10 min and 2%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Dal Bello
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Mariia Lapaeva
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Group, Department of Informatics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Computer Vision Laboratory, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Agustina La Greca Saint-Esteven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Computer Vision Laboratory, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Philipp Wallimann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Manuel Günther
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Group, Department of Informatics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Nicolaus Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Stephanie Tanadini-Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Szmul A, Taylor S, Lim P, Cantwell J, Moreira I, Zhang Y, D’Souza D, Moinuddin S, Gaze MN, Gains J, Veiga C. Deep learning based synthetic CT from cone beam CT generation for abdominal paediatric radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:105006. [PMID: 36996837 PMCID: PMC10160738 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acc921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2022] [Revised: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 04/01/2023]
Abstract
Objective. Adaptive radiotherapy workflows require images with the quality of computed tomography (CT) for re-calculation and re-optimisation of radiation doses. In this work we aim to improve the quality of on-board cone beam CT (CBCT) images for dose calculation using deep learning.Approach. We propose a novel framework for CBCT-to-CT synthesis using cycle-consistent Generative Adversarial Networks (cycleGANs). The framework was tailored for paediatric abdominal patients, a challenging application due to the inter-fractional variability in bowel filling and small patient numbers. We introduced to the networks the concept of global residuals only learning and modified the cycleGAN loss function to explicitly promote structural consistency between source and synthetic images. Finally, to compensate for the anatomical variability and address the difficulties in collecting large datasets in the paediatric population, we applied a smart 2D slice selection based on the common field-of-view (abdomen) to our imaging dataset. This acted as a weakly paired data approach that allowed us to take advantage of scans from patients treated for a variety of malignancies (thoracic-abdominal-pelvic) for training purposes. We first optimised the proposed framework and benchmarked its performance on a development dataset. Later, a comprehensive quantitative evaluation was performed on an unseen dataset, which included calculating global image similarity metrics, segmentation-based measures and proton therapy-specific metrics.Main results. We found improved performance for our proposed method, compared to a baseline cycleGAN implementation, on image-similarity metrics such as Mean Absolute Error calculated for a matched virtual CT (55.0 ± 16.6 HU proposed versus 58.9 ± 16.8 HU baseline). There was also a higher level of structural agreement for gastrointestinal gas between source and synthetic images measured using the dice similarity coefficient (0.872 ± 0.053 proposed versus 0.846 ± 0.052 baseline). Differences found in water-equivalent thickness metrics were also smaller for our method (3.3 ± 2.4% proposed versus 3.7 ± 2.8% baseline).Significance. Our findings indicate that our innovations to the cycleGAN framework improved the quality and structure consistency of the synthetic CTs generated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Szmul
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sabrina Taylor
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Pei Lim
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jessica Cantwell
- Radiotherapy, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Isabel Moreira
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ying Zhang
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Derek D’Souza
- Radiotherapy Physics Services, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Syed Moinuddin
- Radiotherapy, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mark N. Gaze
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jennifer Gains
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Catarina Veiga
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bryant JM, Weygand J, Keit E, Cruz-Chamorro R, Sandoval ML, Oraiqat IM, Andreozzi J, Redler G, Latifi K, Feygelman V, Rosenberg SA. Stereotactic Magnetic Resonance-Guided Adaptive and Non-Adaptive Radiotherapy on Combination MR-Linear Accelerators: Current Practice and Future Directions. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:2081. [PMID: 37046741 PMCID: PMC10093051 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15072081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an effective radiation therapy technique that has allowed for shorter treatment courses, as compared to conventionally dosed radiation therapy. As its name implies, SBRT relies on daily image guidance to ensure that each fraction targets a tumor, instead of healthy tissue. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers improved soft-tissue visualization, allowing for better tumor and normal tissue delineation. MR-guided RT (MRgRT) has traditionally been defined by the use of offline MRI to aid in defining the RT volumes during the initial planning stages in order to ensure accurate tumor targeting while sparing critical normal tissues. However, the ViewRay MRIdian and Elekta Unity have improved upon and revolutionized the MRgRT by creating a combined MRI and linear accelerator (MRL), allowing MRgRT to incorporate online MRI in RT. MRL-based MR-guided SBRT (MRgSBRT) represents a novel solution to deliver higher doses to larger volumes of gross disease, regardless of the proximity of at-risk organs due to the (1) superior soft-tissue visualization for patient positioning, (2) real-time continuous intrafraction assessment of internal structures, and (3) daily online adaptive replanning. Stereotactic MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) has enabled the safe delivery of ablative doses to tumors adjacent to radiosensitive tissues throughout the body. Although it is still a relatively new RT technique, SMART has demonstrated significant opportunities to improve disease control and reduce toxicity. In this review, we included the current clinical applications and the active prospective trials related to SMART. We highlighted the most impactful clinical studies at various tumor sites. In addition, we explored how MRL-based multiparametric MRI could potentially synergize with SMART to significantly change the current treatment paradigm and to improve personalized cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Stephen A. Rosenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA; (J.M.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kishan AU, Ma TM, Lamb JM, Casado M, Wilhalme H, Low DA, Sheng K, Sharma S, Nickols NG, Pham J, Yang Y, Gao Y, Neylon J, Basehart V, Cao M, Steinberg ML. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided vs Computed Tomography-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: The MIRAGE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2023; 9:365-373. [PMID: 36633877 PMCID: PMC9857817 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.6558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 77.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Importance Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guidance offers multiple theoretical advantages in the context of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer. However, to our knowledge, these advantages have yet to be demonstrated in a randomized clinical trial. Objective To determine whether aggressive margin reduction with MRI guidance significantly reduces acute grade 2 or greater genitourinary (GU) toxic effects after prostate SBRT compared with computed tomography (CT) guidance. Design, Setting, and Participants This phase 3 randomized clinical trial (MRI-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer [MIRAGE]) enrolled men aged 18 years or older who were receiving SBRT for clinically localized prostate adenocarcinoma at a single center between May 5, 2020, and October 1, 2021. Data were analyzed from January 15, 2021, through May 15, 2022. All patients had 3 months or more of follow-up. Interventions Patients were randomized 1:1 to SBRT with CT guidance (control arm) or MRI guidance. Planning margins of 4 mm (CT arm) and 2 mm (MRI arm) were used to deliver 40 Gy in 5 fractions. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was the incidence of acute (≤90 days after SBRT) grade 2 or greater GU toxic effects (using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.03 [CTCAE v4.03]). Secondary outcomes included CTCAE v4.03-based gastrointestinal toxic effects and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)-based and Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26 (EPIC-26)-based outcomes. Results Between May 2020 and October 2021, 156 patients were randomized: 77 to CT (median age, 71 years [IQR, 67-77 years]) and 79 to MRI (median age, 71 years [IQR, 68-75 years]). A prespecified interim futility analysis conducted after 100 patients reached 90 or more days after SBRT was performed October 1, 2021, with the sample size reestimated to 154 patients. Thus, the trial was closed to accrual early. The incidence of acute grade 2 or greater GU toxic effects was significantly lower with MRI vs CT guidance (24.4% [95% CI, 15.4%-35.4%] vs 43.4% [95% CI, 32.1%-55.3%]; P = .01), as was the incidence of acute grade 2 or greater gastrointestinal toxic effects (0.0% [95% CI, 0.0%-4.6%] vs 10.5% [95% CI, 4.7%-19.7%]; P = .003). Magnetic resonance imaging guidance was associated with a significantly smaller percentage of patients with a 15-point or greater increase in IPSS at 1 month (6.8% [5 of 72] vs 19.4% [14 of 74]; P = .01) and a significantly reduced percentage of patients with a clinically significant (≥12-point) decrease in EPIC-26 bowel scores (25.0% [17 of 68] vs 50.0% [34 of 68]; P = .001) at 1 month. Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized clinical trial, compared with CT-guidance, MRI-guided SBRT significantly reduced both moderate acute physician-scored toxic effects and decrements in patient-reported quality of life. Longer-term follow-up will confirm whether these notable benefits persist. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04384770.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amar U. Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles
- Department of Urology, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Ting Martin Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - James M. Lamb
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Maria Casado
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Holly Wilhalme
- Statistics Core, Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Daniel A. Low
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Ke Sheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Sahil Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Nicholas G. Nickols
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles
- Department of Urology, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Jonathan Pham
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Yingli Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Yu Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - John Neylon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Vincent Basehart
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Minsong Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ng J, Gregucci F, Pennell RT, Nagar H, Golden EB, Knisely JPS, Sanfilippo NJ, Formenti SC. MRI-LINAC: A transformative technology in radiation oncology. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1117874. [PMID: 36776309 PMCID: PMC9911688 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1117874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Advances in radiotherapy technologies have enabled more precise target guidance, improved treatment verification, and greater control and versatility in radiation delivery. Amongst the recent novel technologies, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) may hold the greatest potential to improve the therapeutic gains of image-guided delivery of radiation dose. The ability of the MRI linear accelerator (LINAC) to image tumors and organs with on-table MRI, to manage organ motion and dose delivery in real-time, and to adapt the radiotherapy plan on the day of treatment while the patient is on the table are major advances relative to current conventional radiation treatments. These advanced techniques demand efficient coordination and communication between members of the treatment team. MRgRT could fundamentally transform the radiotherapy delivery process within radiation oncology centers through the reorganization of the patient and treatment team workflow process. However, the MRgRT technology currently is limited by accessibility due to the cost of capital investment and the time and personnel allocation needed for each fractional treatment and the unclear clinical benefit compared to conventional radiotherapy platforms. As the technology evolves and becomes more widely available, we present the case that MRgRT has the potential to become a widely utilized treatment platform and transform the radiation oncology treatment process just as earlier disruptive radiation therapy technologies have done.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Ng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States,*Correspondence: John Ng,
| | - Fabiana Gregucci
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States,Department of Radiation Oncology, Miulli General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
| | - Ryan T. Pennell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| | - Himanshu Nagar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| | - Encouse B. Golden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| | | | | | - Silvia C. Formenti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Merten R, Fischer M, Christiansen H, Hellms S, von Klot CAJ, Thomas NH, Knöchelmann AC. Using a Further Planning MRI after Neoadjuvant Androgen Deprivation Therapy Significantly Reduces the Radiation Exposure of Organs at Risk in External Beam Radiotherapy of Prostate Cancer. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12020574. [PMID: 36675503 PMCID: PMC9860985 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12020574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Revised: 01/01/2023] [Accepted: 01/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy for prostate cancer is often preceded by neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), which leads to a reduction in the size of the prostate. This study examines whether it is relevant for treatment planning to acquire a second planning magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after ADT (=MRI 2) or whether it can be planned without disadvantage based on an MRI acquired before starting ADT (=MRI 1). The imaging data for the radiotherapy treatment planning of 17 patients with prostate cancer who received two planning MRIs (before and after neoadjuvant ADT) were analyzed as follows: detailed comparable radiation plans were created separately, each based on the planning CT scan and either MRI 1 or MRI 2. After ADT for an average of 17.2 weeks, the prostate was reduced in size by an average of 24%. By using MRI 2 for treatment planning, the V60Gy of the rectum could be significantly relieved by an average of 15% with the same coverage of the target volume, and the V70Gy by as much as 33% (compared to using MRI 1 alone). Using a second MRI for treatment planning after neoadjuvant ADT in prostate cancer leads to a significant relief for the organs at risk, especially in the high dose range, with the same irradiation of the target volume, and should therefore be carried out regularly. Waiting for the prostate to shrink after a few months of ADT contributes to relief for the organs at risk and to lowering the toxicity. However, the use of reduced target volumes requires an image-guided application, and the oncological outcome needs to be verified in further studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roland Merten
- Clinic for Radiotherapy, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-511-532-2574
| | - Mirko Fischer
- Clinic for Radiotherapy, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Hans Christiansen
- Clinic for Radiotherapy, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Susanne Hellms
- Institute for Radiology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Nele Henrike Thomas
- Institute for Biostatistics, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ma TM, Ballas LK, Wilhalme H, Sachdeva A, Chong N, Sharma S, Yang T, Basehart V, Reiter RE, Saigal C, Chamie K, Litwin MS, Rettig MB, Nickols NG, Yoon SM, Smith L, Gao Y, Steinberg ML, Cao M, Kishan AU. Quality-of-Life Outcomes and Toxicity Profile Among Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation: The SCIMITAR Multicenter Phase 2 Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 115:142-52. [PMID: 36007724 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.08.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Revised: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Postoperative radiation therapy (RT) is an underused standard-of-care intervention for patients with prostate cancer and recurrence/adverse pathologic features after radical prostatectomy. Although stereotactic body RT (SBRT) is a well-studied and convenient option for definitive treatment, data on the postprostatectomy setting are extremely limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate short-term physician-scored genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities and patient-reported outcomes after postprostatectomy SBRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS The SCIMITAR trial was a phase 2, dual-center, open-label, single-arm trial that enrolled patients with postoperative prostate-specific antigen >0.03 ng/mL or adverse pathologic features. Coprimary endpoints were 4-year biochemical recurrence-free survival, physician-scored acute and late GU and GI toxicities by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.03) scale, and patient-reported quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes, as represented by the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index-26 and the International Prostate Symptom Score. Patients received SBRT 30 to 34 Gy/5 fractions to the prostate bed ± bed boost ± pelvic nodes with computed tomography (CTgRT) or magnetic resonance imaging guidance (MRgRT) in a nonrandomized fashion. Physician-scored toxicities and patient-reported QOL outcomes were collected at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months of follow-up. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to evaluate predictors of toxicities and QOL outcomes. RESULTS One hundred participants were enrolled (CTgRT, n = 69; MRgRT, n = 31). The median follow-up was 29.5 months (CTgRT: 33.3 months, MRgRT: 22.6 months). The median (range) prostate bed dose was 32 (30-34) Gy. Acute and late grade 2 GU toxicities were both 9% while acute and late grade 2 GI toxicities were 5% and 0%, respectively. Three patients had grade 3 toxicity (n = 1 GU, n = 2 GI). No patient receiving MRgRT had grade 3 GU or grade ≥2 GI toxicity. Compared with CTgRT, MRgRT was associated with a 30.5% (95% confidence interval, 11.6%-49.5%) reduction in any-grade acute GI toxicity (P = .006). MRgRT was independently associated with improved any-grade GI toxicity and improved bowel QOL. CONCLUSIONS Postprostatectomy SBRT was well tolerated at short-term follow-up. MRgRT may decrease GI toxicity. Longer toxicity and/or efficacy follow-up and randomized studies are needed.
Collapse
|
18
|
Poon DMC, Yang B, Geng H, Wong OL, Chiu ST, Cheung KY, Yu SK, Chiu G, Yuan J. Analysis of online plan adaptation for 1.5T magnetic resonance-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy (MRgSBRT) of prostate cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:841-850. [PMID: 35199189 PMCID: PMC8866042 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-03950-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 02/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To analyze and characterize the online plan adaptation of 1.5T magnetic resonance-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy (MRgSBRT) of prostate cancer (PC). METHODS PC patients (n = 107) who received adaptive 1.5 Tesla MRgSBRT were included. Online plan adaptation was implemented by either the adapt-to-position (ATP) or adapt-to-shape (ATS) methods. Patients were assigned to the ATS group if they underwent ≥ 1 ATS fraction (n = 51); the remainder were assigned to the ATP group (n = 56). The online plan adaptation records of 535 (107 × 5) fractions were retrospectively reviewed. Rationales for ATS decision-making were determined and analyzed using predefined criteria. Statistics of ATS fractions were summarized. Associations of patient characteristics and clinical factors with ATS utilization were investigated. RESULTS There were 87 (16.3%) ATS fractions and 448 ATP fractions (83.7%). The numbers of ATS adoptions in fractions 1-5 were 29 (29/107, 27.1%), 18 (16.8%), 15 (14.0%), 16 (15.0%), and 9 (8.4%), respectively, with significant differences in adoption frequency between fractions (p = 0.007). Other baseline patient characteristics and clinical factors were not significantly associated with ATS classification (all p > 0.05). Underlying criteria for the determination of ATS implementation comprised anatomical changes (77 fractions in 50 patients) and discrete multiple targets (15 fractions in 3 patients). No ATS utilization was determined using dosimetric or online quality assurance criteria. CONCLUSIONS This study contributes to facilitating the establishment of a standardized protocol for online MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy in PC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darren M. C. Poon
- grid.414329.90000 0004 1764 7097Comprehensive Oncology Centre, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR China
| | - Bin Yang
- grid.414329.90000 0004 1764 7097Medical Physics Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR China
| | - Hui Geng
- grid.414329.90000 0004 1764 7097Medical Physics Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR China
| | - Oi Lei Wong
- grid.414329.90000 0004 1764 7097Research Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR China
| | - Sin Ting Chiu
- grid.414329.90000 0004 1764 7097Department of Radiotherapy, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR China
| | - Kin Yin Cheung
- grid.414329.90000 0004 1764 7097Medical Physics Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR China
| | - Siu Ki Yu
- grid.414329.90000 0004 1764 7097Medical Physics Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR China
| | - George Chiu
- grid.414329.90000 0004 1764 7097Department of Radiotherapy, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR China
| | - Jing Yuan
- grid.414329.90000 0004 1764 7097Research Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Guerini AE, Nici S, Magrini SM, Riga S, Toraci C, Pegurri L, Facheris G, Cozzaglio C, Farina D, Liserre R, Gasparotti R, Ravanelli M, Rondi P, Spiazzi L, Buglione M. Adoption of Hybrid MRI-Linac Systems for the Treatment of Brain Tumors: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature Regarding Clinical and Technical Features. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2023; 22:15330338231199286. [PMID: 37774771 PMCID: PMC10542234 DOI: 10.1177/15330338231199286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Revised: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Possible advantages of magnetic resonance (MR)-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) for the treatment of brain tumors include improved definition of treatment volumes and organs at risk (OARs) that could allow margin reductions, resulting in limited dose to the OARs and/or dose escalation to target volumes. Recently, hybrid systems integrating a linear accelerator and an magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan (MRI-linacs, MRL) have been introduced, that could potentially lead to a fully MRI-based treatment workflow. METHODS We performed a systematic review of the published literature regarding the adoption of MRL for the treatment of primary or secondary brain tumors (last update November 3, 2022), retrieving a total of 2487 records; after a selection based on title and abstracts, the full text of 74 articles was analyzed, finally resulting in the 52 papers included in this review. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Several solutions have been implemented to achieve a paradigm shift from CT-based radiotherapy to MRgRT, such as the management of geometric integrity and the definition of synthetic CT models that estimate electron density. Multiple sequences have been optimized to acquire images with adequate quality with on-board MR scanner in limited times. Various sophisticated algorithms have been developed to compensate the impact of magnetic field on dose distribution and calculate daily adaptive plans in a few minutes with satisfactory dosimetric parameters for the treatment of primary brain tumors and cerebral metastases. Dosimetric studies and preliminary clinical experiences demonstrated the feasibility of treating brain lesions with MRL. CONCLUSIONS The adoption of an MRI-only workflow is feasible and could offer several advantages for the treatment of brain tumors, including superior image quality for lesions and OARs and the possibility to adapt the treatment plan on the basis of daily MRI. The growing body of clinical data will clarify the potential benefit in terms of toxicity and response to treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Emanuele Guerini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University and Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
- Co-first authors
| | - Stefania Nici
- Medical Physics Department, ASST Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
- Co-first authors
| | - Stefano Maria Magrini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University and Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Stefano Riga
- Medical Physics Department, ASST Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Cristian Toraci
- Medical Physics Department, ASST Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Ludovica Pegurri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University and Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Giorgio Facheris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University and Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Claudia Cozzaglio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University and Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
- Medical Physics Department, ASST Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Davide Farina
- Radiology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Roberto Liserre
- Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili University Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Roberto Gasparotti
- Neuroradiology Unit, Department of Medical-Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Marco Ravanelli
- Radiology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Paolo Rondi
- Radiology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Luigi Spiazzi
- Medical Physics Department, ASST Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
- Co-last author
| | - Michela Buglione
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University and Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
- Co-last author
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Martin JM, Richardson M, Siva S, Cardoso M, Handmer M, Sidhom M. Mechanisms, mitigation, and management of urinary toxicity from prostate radiotherapy. Lancet Oncol 2022; 23:e534-e543. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00544-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2022] [Revised: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
21
|
Alongi F, Rigo M, Figlia V, Nicosia L, Mazzola R, Giaj Levra N, Ricchetti F, Trapani G, Attinà G, Vitale C, Pastorello E, De Simone A, Gurrera D, Naccarato S, Sicignano G, Ruggieri R, Cuccia F. 1.5T MR-Guided Daily-Adaptive SBRT for Prostate Cancer: Preliminary Report of Toxicity and Quality of Life of the First 100 Patients. J Pers Med 2022; 12. [PMID: 36556203 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12121982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Revised: 11/24/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: The present study reports the preliminary outcomes in terms of adverse events and quality of life in the first 100 patients treated with 1.5T MR-guided daily-adaptive stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Methods: From October 2019 to December 2020, 100 patients, enrolled in a prospective study, received MR-guided SBRT for prostate cancer. Rectal spacer insertion was optional and administered in 37 patients. In total, 32 patients received androgen deprivation therapy in accordance with international guidelines. A prospective collection of data regarding toxicity and quality of life was performed. Results: The median age was 71 years (range, 52-84). The median total dose delivered was 35 Gy (35-36.25 Gy) in five sessions, either on alternate days (n = 25) or consecutive days (n = 75). For acute toxicity, we recorded: seven cases of acute G2 urinary pain and four cases of G2 gastrointestinal events. The median follow-up was 12 months (3-20), recording three late G2 urinary events and one G3 case, consisting of a patient who required a TURP 8 months after the treatment. For gastrointestinal toxicity, we observed 3 G ≥ 2 GI events, including one patient who received argon laser therapy for radiation-induced proctitis. Up to the last follow-up, all patients are alive and with no evidence of biochemical relapse, except for an M1 low-volume patient in distant progression two months after radiotherapy. QoL evaluation reported a substantial resolution of any discomfort within the second follow-up after radiotherapy, with the only exception being sexual items. Notably, after one year, global health items were improved compared to the baseline assessment. Conclusions: This study reports very promising outcomes in terms of adverse events and QoL, supporting the role of 1.5T MR-guided SBRT for prostate cancer. To date, this series is one of the first and largest available in the literature. Long-term results are warranted.
Collapse
|
22
|
Lapaeva M, La Greca Saint-Esteven A, Wallimann P, Günther M, Konukoglu E, Andratschke N, Guckenberger M, Tanadini-Lang S, Dal Bello R. Synthetic computed tomographies for low-field magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy in the abdomen. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2022; 24:173-179. [DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2022.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Revised: 11/13/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|
23
|
Schilham MGM, Rijpkema M, Scheenen T, Hermsen R, Barentsz JO, Michiel Sedelaar JP, Kusters-Vandevelde H, Kerkmeijer LGW, Somford DM, Gotthardt M. How Advanced Imaging Will Guide Therapeutic Strategies for Patients with Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer in the Years to Come. Eur Urol 2022; 82:578-580. [PMID: 36167598 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
In recent years, clinical use of novel advanced imaging modalities in prostate cancer detection, staging, and therapy has intensified and is currently reforming clinical guidelines. In the future, advanced imaging technologies will continue to develop and become even more accurate, which will offer new opportunities for improving patient selection, surgical treatment, and radiotherapy, with the potential to guide prostate cancer therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melline G M Schilham
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen/Eindhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Mark Rijpkema
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Tom Scheenen
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Rick Hermsen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jelle O Barentsz
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J P Michiel Sedelaar
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen/Eindhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Linda G W Kerkmeijer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Diederik M Somford
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen/Eindhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Martin Gotthardt
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Xiong Y, Rabe M, Nierer L, Kawula M, Corradini S, Belka C, Riboldi M, Landry G, Kurz C. Assessment of intrafractional prostate motion and its dosimetric impact in MRI-guided online adaptive radiotherapy with gating. Strahlenther Onkol 2022. [PMID: 36151215 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-022-02005-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/04/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to evaluate the intrafractional prostate motion captured during gated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided online adaptive radiotherapy for prostate cancer and analyze its impact on the delivered dose as well as the effect of gating. METHODS Sagittal 2D cine-MRI scans were acquired at 4 Hz during treatment at a ViewRay MRIdian (ViewRay Inc., Oakwood Village, OH, USA) MR linac. Prostate shifts in anterior-posterior (AP) and superior-inferior (SI) directions were extracted separately. Using the static dose cloud approximation, the planned fractional dose was shifted according to the 2D gated motion (residual motion in gating window) to estimate the delivered dose by superimposing and averaging the shifted dose volumes. The dose of a hypothetical non-gated delivery was reconstructed similarly using the non-gated motion. For the clinical target volume (CTV), rectum, and bladder, dose-volume histogram parameters of the planned and reconstructed doses were compared. RESULTS In total, 174 fractions (15.7 h of cine-MRI) from 10 patients were evaluated. The average (±1 σ) non-gated prostate motion was 0.6 ± 1.0 mm in the AP and 0.0 ± 0.6 mm in the SI direction with respect to the centroid position of the gating boundary. 95% of the shifts were within [-3.5, 2.7] mm in the AP and [-2.9, 3.2] mm in the SI direction. For the gated treatment and averaged over all fractions, CTV D98% decreased by less than 2% for all patients. The rectum and the bladder D2% increased by less than 3% and 0.5%, respectively. Doses reconstructed for gated and non-gated delivery were similar for most fractions. CONCLUSION A pipeline for extraction of prostate motion during gated MRI-guided radiotherapy based on 2D cine-MRI was implemented. The 2D motion data enabled an approximate estimation of the delivered dose. For the majority of fractions, the benefit of gating was negligible, and clinical dosimetric constraints were met, indicating safety of the currently adopted gated MRI-guided treatment workflow.
Collapse
|
25
|
Hehakaya C, Sharma AM, van der Voort Van Zijp JR, Grobbee DE, Verkooijen HM, Izaguirre EW, Moors EH. Implementation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Radiation Therapy in Routine Care: Opportunities and Challenges in the United States. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 7:100953. [PMID: 35651662 PMCID: PMC9149022 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.100953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Magnetic resonance image (MRI)-guided radiation therapy with the 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance linear accelerator (MR-Linac) is a rapidly evolving and emerging treatment. The MR-Linac literature mainly focused on clinical and technological factors in technology implementation, but it is relatively silent on health care system-related factors. Consequently, there is a lack of understanding of opportunities and barriers in implementing the MR-Linac from a health care system perspective. This study addresses this gap with a case study of the US health care system. Methods and Materials An exploratory, qualitative research design was used. Data collection consisted of 23 semistructured interviews ranging from clinical experts at the radiation therapy and radiology department to insurance commissioners in 7 US hospitals. Analysis of opportunities and barriers was guided by the Nonadoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread and Sustainability framework for new medical technologies in health care organizations. Results Opportunities included high-precision MR-guidance during radiation therapy with potential continued technical advances and better patient outcomes. MR-Linac also offers opportunities for research, professional, and economic development. Barriers included the lack of empirical evidence of clinical effectiveness, technological complexity, and large staffing and structural investments. Furthermore, the presence of patients with disadvantaged socioeconomic background, and the lack of appropriate reimbursement as well as regulatory conditions can hinder technology implementation. Conclusions Our study confirms the current literature on implementing the MR-Linac, but also reveals additional challenges for the US health care system. Alongside the well-known clinical and technical factors, also professional, socioeconomic, market, and governing influences affect technology implementation. These findings highlight new connections to facilitate technology uptake and provide a richer start to understanding its long-term effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charisma Hehakaya
- Division of Imaging & Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Corresponding author
| | - Ankur M. Sharma
- University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine and Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, England
| | | | - Diederick E. Grobbee
- Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Helena M. Verkooijen
- Division of Imaging & Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ellen H.M. Moors
- Innovation Studies, Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Wegener D, Thome A, Paulsen F, Gani C, Boldt J, Butzer S, Thorwarth D, Moennich D, Nachbar M, Müller AC, Zips D, Boeke S. First Experience and Prospective Evaluation on Feasibility and Acute Toxicity of Online Adaptive Radiotherapy of the Prostate Bed as Salvage Treatment in Patients with Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer on a 1.5T MR-Linac. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11164651. [PMID: 36012885 PMCID: PMC9410121 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11164651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2022] [Revised: 08/02/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Novel MRI-linear accelerator hybrids (MR-Linacs, MRL) promise an optimization of radiotherapy (RT) through daily MRI imaging with enhanced soft tissue contrast and plan adaptation on the anatomy of the day. These features might potentially improve salvage RT of prostate cancer (SRT), where the clinical target volume is confined by the mobile organs at risk (OAR) rectum and bladder. So far, no data exist about the feasibility of the MRL technology for SRT. In this study, we prospectively examined patients treated with SRT on a 1.5 T MRL and report on workflow, feasibility and acute toxicity. Patients and Methods: Sixteen patients were prospectively enrolled within the MRL-01 study (NCT: NCT04172753). All patients were staged and had an indication for SRT after radical prostatectomy according to national guidelines. RT consisted of 66 Gy in 33 fractions or 66.5/70 Gy in 35 fractions in case of a defined high-risk region. On the 1.5 T MRL, daily plan adaption was performed using one of two workflows: adapt to shape (ATS, using contour adaptation and replanning) or adapt to position (ATP, rigid replanning onto the online anatomy with virtual couch shift). Duration of treatment steps, choice of workflow and treatment failure were recorded for each fraction of each patient. Patient-reported questionnaires about patient comfort were evaluated as well as extensive reporting of acute toxicity (patient reported and clinician scored). Results: A total of 524/554 (94.6%) of fractions were successfully treated on the MRL. No patient-sided treatment failures occurred. In total, ATP was chosen in 45.7% and ATS in 54.3% of fractions. In eight cases, ATP was performed on top of the initial ATS workflow. Mean (range) duration of all fractions (on-table time until end of treatment) was 25.1 (17.6–44.8) minutes. Mean duration of the ATP workflow was 20.60 (17.6–25.2) minutes and of the ATS workflow 31.3 (28.2–34.1) minutes. Patient-reported treatment experience questionnaires revealed high rates of tolerability of the treatment procedure. Acute toxicity (RTOG, CTC as well as patient-reported CTC, IPSS and ICIQ) during RT and 3 months after was mild to moderate with a tendency of recovery to baseline levels at 3 months post RT. No G3+ toxicity was scored for any item. Conclusions: In this first report on SRT of prostate cancer patients on a 1.5 T MRL, we could demonstrate the feasibility of both available workflows. Daily MR-guided adaptive SRT of mean 25.1 min per fraction was well tolerated in this pretreated collective, and we report low rates of acute toxicity for this treatment. This study suggests that SRT on a 1.5 T MRL can be performed in clinical routine and it serves as a benchmark for future analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Wegener
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
- Correspondence:
| | - Alexandra Thome
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Frank Paulsen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Cihan Gani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Jessica Boldt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Sarah Butzer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David Moennich
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Marcel Nachbar
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Arndt-Christian Müller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Ludwigsburg, 71640 Ludwigsburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Simon Boeke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kerkmeijer LGW, Kishan AU, Tree AC. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided Adaptive Radiotherapy for Urological Cancers: What Urologists Should Know. Eur Urol 2022; 82:149-151. [PMID: 35031164 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.12.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2021] [Accepted: 12/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided radiotherapy allows for online adaptation of the radiation plan on the basis of anatomical and functional changes during treatment. MRI-guided radiotherapy holds significant promise for broadening the therapeutic window for multiple urological cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda G W Kerkmeijer
- Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Amar U Kishan
- Radiation Oncology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Alison C Tree
- Uro-Oncology, The Royal Marsden Hospital and the Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Nigogosyan Z, Ippolito JE, Collins SP, Wang EC. Prostate MRI in Stereotactic Body Radiation Treatment Planning and Delivery for Localized Prostate Cancer. Radiographics 2022; 42:1251-1264. [PMID: 35714039 DOI: 10.1148/rg.210114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Prostate MRI is increasingly being used to make diagnoses and guide management for patients receiving definitive radiation treatment for prostate cancer. Radiologists should be familiar with the potential uses of prostate MRI in radiation therapy planning and delivery. Radiation therapy is an established option for the definitive treatment of localized prostate cancer. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an external-beam radiation therapy method used to deliver a high dose of radiation to an extracranial target in the body, often in five or fewer fractions. SBRT is increasingly being used for prostate cancer treatment and has been recognized by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network as an acceptable definitive treatment regimen for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk prostate cancer. MRI is commonly used to aid in prostate radiation therapy. The authors review the uses of prostate MRI in SBRT treatment planning and delivery. Specific topics discussed include the use of prostate MRI for identification of and dose reduction to the membranous and prostatic urethra, which can decrease the risk of acute and late toxicities. MRI is also useful for identification and appropriate dose coverage of the prostate apex and areas of extraprostatic extension or seminal vesicle invasion. In prospective studies, prostate MRI is being validated for identification of and dose intensification to dominant intraprostatic lesions, which potentially can improve oncologic outcomes. It also can be used to evaluate the placement of fiducial markers and hydrogel spacers for radiation therapy planning and delivery. ©RSNA, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zack Nigogosyan
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO (Z.N., J.E.I.); and Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, 3800 Reservoir Rd NW, Washington, DC 20007 (S.P.C., E.C.W.)
| | - Joseph E Ippolito
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO (Z.N., J.E.I.); and Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, 3800 Reservoir Rd NW, Washington, DC 20007 (S.P.C., E.C.W.)
| | - Sean P Collins
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO (Z.N., J.E.I.); and Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, 3800 Reservoir Rd NW, Washington, DC 20007 (S.P.C., E.C.W.)
| | - Edina C Wang
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO (Z.N., J.E.I.); and Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, 3800 Reservoir Rd NW, Washington, DC 20007 (S.P.C., E.C.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Westley R, Hall E, Tree A. HERMES: Delivery of a Speedy Prostate Cancer Treatment. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2022; 34:426-429. [PMID: 35093251 PMCID: PMC8802653 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2022.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2021] [Revised: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- R Westley
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - E Hall
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - A Tree
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Ma X, Chen X, Wang Y, Qin S, Yan X, Cao Y, Chen Y, Dai J, Men K. Personalized modeling to improve pseudo-CT images for magnetic resonance imaging-guided adaptive radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 113:885-892. [PMID: 35462026 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.03.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Revised: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/25/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Magnetic resonance imaging-guided adaptive radiotherapy (MRIgART) greatly improves daily tumor localization and enables online re-planning to obtain maximum dosimetric benefits. However, accurately predicting patient-specific electron density maps for adaptive radiotherapy (ART) planning remains a challenge. Therefore, this study proposes a personalized modeling framework for generating pseudo-computed tomography (pCT) in MRIgART. METHODS AND MATERIALS Eighty-three patients who received MRIgART were included and CT simulations were performed on all the patients. Daily T2-weighted 1.5 T MRI was acquired using the Unity MR-linac for adaptive planning. Pairs of co-registered CT and daily MRI images of the randomly selected training set (68 patients) were inputted into a generative adversarial network (GAN) to establish a population model. The personalized model for each patient in the test set (15 patients) was acquired using model fine-tuning, which adopted the pair of the deformable-registered CT and the first daily MRI to fine-tune the population model. The pCT quality was quantitatively evaluated in the second and the last fractions with three metrics: intensity accuracy using mean absolute error (MAE); anatomical structure similarity using dice similarity coefficient (DSC); and dosimetric consistency using gamma-passing rate (GPR). RESULTS The image generation speed was 65 slices per second. For the last fractions, and for head-neck, thoracoabdominal, and pelvic cases, the average MAEs were 76.8 HU vs. 123.6 HU, 38.1 HU vs. 52.0 HU, and 29.5 HU vs. 39.7 HU, respectively. Furthermore, the average DSCs of bone were 0.92 vs. 0.80, 0.85 vs. 0.73, and 0.94 vs. 0.88; and the average GPRs (1%/1 mm) were 95.5% vs. 84.7%, 97.7% vs. 92.8%, and 95.5% vs. 88.7%, for personalized vs. population models, respectively. Results of the second fractions were similar. CONCLUSIONS The proposed personalized modeling framework remarkably improved pCT quality for multiple treatment sites and was well suited for the MRIgART clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiangyu Ma
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China..
| | - Xinyuan Chen
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yu Wang
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Shirui Qin
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xuena Yan
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ying Cao
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yan Chen
- Elekta Technology Co., Shanghai, China
| | - Jianrong Dai
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Kuo Men
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China..
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Michalet M, Riou O, Cottet-Moine J, Castan F, Gourgou S, Valdenaire S, Debuire P, Ailleres N, Draghici R, Charissoux M, Llacer Moscardo C, Farcy-Jacquet MP, Fenoglietto P, Azria D. Magnetic Resonance-Guided Reirradiation for Local Recurrence within the Prostate or in the Prostate Bed: One-Year Clinical Results of a Prospective Registry Study. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14081943. [PMID: 35454850 PMCID: PMC9030485 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14081943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2022] [Revised: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 04/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Around 33% of patients treated by EBRT or brachytherapy will present a biochemical recurrence. SBRT is a new option for the treatment of patients with local-only recurrence. MRgRT seems to be interesting for the treatment of these recurrences. This article presents the one-year late tolerance and biochemical recurrence-free survival results of a prospective registry study. Patients with intraprostatic (or in the prostate bed) recurrence were treated with 5 to 9 fractions (median dose of 30 Gy in 5 fractions) with the MRIdian® system. PSA level and toxicities were evaluated before treatment and at three, six and 12 months after treatment. Thirty-seven patients with a median age of 74.5 years old were treated between 21 October 2019 and 7 December 2020. Acute tolerance was excellent with no grade >2 toxicities. Twelve months after treatment, we observed an increase of grade 1−2 dysuria (46% vs. 13% before treatment) and grade 1 polyuria (73% vs. 7%). The six, nine and 12-months biochemical-recurrence free survival were 97.3%, 86.5% and 65.0%. Fifteen patients (40%) presented a biochemical recurrence. Nine of these 15 patients (60%) had a persistent disease within the treated volume. In conclusion, MRgRT is safe and has promising survival results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morgan Michalet
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France; (O.R.); (J.C.-M.); (S.V.); (P.D.); (N.A.); (R.D.); (M.C.); (C.L.M.); (P.F.); (D.A.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Olivier Riou
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France; (O.R.); (J.C.-M.); (S.V.); (P.D.); (N.A.); (R.D.); (M.C.); (C.L.M.); (P.F.); (D.A.)
| | - Jeremy Cottet-Moine
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France; (O.R.); (J.C.-M.); (S.V.); (P.D.); (N.A.); (R.D.); (M.C.); (C.L.M.); (P.F.); (D.A.)
| | - Florence Castan
- Biometrics Unit ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute, University Montpellier, 34090 Montpellier, France; (F.C.); (S.G.)
| | - Sophie Gourgou
- Biometrics Unit ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute, University Montpellier, 34090 Montpellier, France; (F.C.); (S.G.)
| | - Simon Valdenaire
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France; (O.R.); (J.C.-M.); (S.V.); (P.D.); (N.A.); (R.D.); (M.C.); (C.L.M.); (P.F.); (D.A.)
| | - Pierre Debuire
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France; (O.R.); (J.C.-M.); (S.V.); (P.D.); (N.A.); (R.D.); (M.C.); (C.L.M.); (P.F.); (D.A.)
| | - Norbert Ailleres
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France; (O.R.); (J.C.-M.); (S.V.); (P.D.); (N.A.); (R.D.); (M.C.); (C.L.M.); (P.F.); (D.A.)
| | - Roxana Draghici
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France; (O.R.); (J.C.-M.); (S.V.); (P.D.); (N.A.); (R.D.); (M.C.); (C.L.M.); (P.F.); (D.A.)
| | - Marie Charissoux
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France; (O.R.); (J.C.-M.); (S.V.); (P.D.); (N.A.); (R.D.); (M.C.); (C.L.M.); (P.F.); (D.A.)
| | - Carmen Llacer Moscardo
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France; (O.R.); (J.C.-M.); (S.V.); (P.D.); (N.A.); (R.D.); (M.C.); (C.L.M.); (P.F.); (D.A.)
| | - Marie-Pierre Farcy-Jacquet
- Institut de Cancérologie du Gard, University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, CHU Carémeau, 30900 Nîmes, France;
| | - Pascal Fenoglietto
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France; (O.R.); (J.C.-M.); (S.V.); (P.D.); (N.A.); (R.D.); (M.C.); (C.L.M.); (P.F.); (D.A.)
| | - David Azria
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France; (O.R.); (J.C.-M.); (S.V.); (P.D.); (N.A.); (R.D.); (M.C.); (C.L.M.); (P.F.); (D.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Zwart LG, Ong F, ten Asbroek LA, van Dieren EB, Koch SA, Bhawanie A, de Wit E, Dasselaar JJ. Cone-beam computed tomography-guided online adaptive radiotherapy is feasible for prostate cancer patients. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2022; 22:98-103. [PMID: 35602545 PMCID: PMC9115122 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2022.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Revised: 04/22/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Online adaptive radiotherapy (oART) is achievable within twenty minutes. Cone-beam computed tomography-guided oART is feasible in daily clinical practice. The adapted plan was always preferred over the scheduled plan.
Background and purpose Studies have shown the potential of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-guided online adaptive radiotherapy (oART) for prostate cancer patients in a simulation environment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of the clinical implementation of CBCT-guided oART for prostate cancer patients. Materials and methods Between February and July 2020, eleven prostate cancer patients were treated with CBCT-guided oART using a fractionation scheme of 20 × 3 Gy to the prostate and 20 × 2.7/3.0 Gy to the seminal vesicles for more advanced stages. The on-couch adaptive workflow consisted of influencer (prostate, seminal vesicles, rectum, bladder) review, target review, scheduled (re-calculated) and adapted (re-optimized) plan generation, an independent QA procedure and treatment delivery. Treatment time, proportion of adapted fractions and reasons for plan adaptation were evaluated. Results Mean total treatment time (±SD) from CBCT acquisition to end of treatment delivery was 17.5 ± 3.2 min (range: 10.8–28.8 min). In all 220 fractions, the PTV coverage was increased for the adapted plan compared to the scheduled plan. The V60Gy of bladder and rectum were below the constraints (<5% and <3%) for both scheduled and adapted plans in 171 out of 220 fractions and for the adapted plan only in 30 out of 220 fractions. In 19 out of 220 fractions, the V60Gy of the bladder and/or rectum was above the constraint for the adapted plan. Conclusions The clinical implementation of CBCT-guided oART is feasible for prostate cancer patients. The adaptive workflow is possible within twenty minutes on average with a dedicated team.
Collapse
|
33
|
Gough J, Hall W, Good J, Nash A, Aitken K. Technical Radiotherapy Advances – The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Radiation in the Delivery of Hypofractionation. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2022; 34:301-312. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2022.02.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Revised: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
|
34
|
Sritharan K, Tree A. MR-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer: state of the art and future perspectives. Br J Radiol 2022; 95:20210800. [PMID: 35073158 PMCID: PMC8978250 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20210800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2021] [Revised: 11/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Advances in radiotherapy technology have increased precision of treatment delivery and in some tumour types, improved cure rates and decreased side effects. A new generation of radiotherapy machines, hybrids of an MRI scanner and a linear accelerator, has the potential to further transform the practice of radiation therapy in some cancers. Facilitating superior image quality and the ability to change the dose distribution online on a daily basis (termed "daily adaptive replanning"), MRI-guided radiotherapy machines allow for new possibilities including increasing dose, for hard to treat cancers, and more selective sparing of healthy tissues, where toxicity reduction is the key priority.These machines have already been used to treat most types of cancer, although experience is still in its infancy. This review summarises the potential and current evidence for MRI-guided radiotherapy, with a predominant focus on prostate cancer. Current advantages and disadvantages are discussed including a realistic appraisal of the likely potential to improve patient outcomes. In addition, horizon scanning for near-term possibilities for research and development will hopefully delineate the potential role for this technology over the next decade.
Collapse
|
35
|
Yuan J, Poon DMC, Lo G, Wong OL, Cheung KY, Yu SK. A narrative review of MRI acquisition for MR-guided-radiotherapy in prostate cancer. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2022; 12:1585-1607. [PMID: 35111651 PMCID: PMC8739116 DOI: 10.21037/qims-21-697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 08/20/2021] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
Magnetic resonance guided radiotherapy (MRgRT), enabled by the clinical introduction of the integrated MRI and linear accelerator (MR-LINAC), is a novel technique for prostate cancer (PCa) treatment, promising to further improve clinical outcome and reduce toxicity. The role of prostate MRI has been greatly expanded from the traditional PCa diagnosis to also PCa screening, treatment and surveillance. Diagnostic prostate MRI has been relatively familiar in the community, particularly with the development of Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS). But, on the other hand, the use of MRI in the emerging clinical practice of PCa MRgRT, which is substantially different from that in PCa diagnosis, has been so far sparsely presented in the medical literature. This review attempts to give a comprehensive overview of MRI acquisition techniques currently used in the clinical workflows of PCa MRgRT, from treatment planning to online treatment guidance, in order to promote MRI practice and research for PCa MRgRT. In particular, the major differences in the MRI acquisition of PCa MRgRT from that of diagnostic prostate MRI are demonstrated and explained. Limitations in the current MRI acquisition for PCa MRgRT are analyzed. The future developments of MRI in the PCa MRgRT are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Yuan
- Medical Physics and Research Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Darren M. C. Poon
- Comprehensive Oncology Centre, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Gladys Lo
- Department of Diagnostic & Interventional Radiology, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Oi Lei Wong
- Medical Physics and Research Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Kin Yin Cheung
- Medical Physics and Research Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Siu Ki Yu
- Medical Physics and Research Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Cellini F, Tagliaferri L, Frascino V, Alitto AR, Fionda B, Boldrini L, Romano A, Casà C, Catucci F, Mattiucci GC, Valentini V. Radiation therapy for prostate cancer: What's the best in 2021. Urologia 2022; 89:5-15. [PMID: 34496707 DOI: 10.1177/03915603211042335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Radiotherapy is highly involved in the management of prostate cancer. Its features and potential applications experienced a radical evolution over last decades, as they are associated to the continuous evolution of available technology and current oncological innovations. Some application of radiotherapy like brachytherapy have been recently enriched by innovative features and multidisciplinary dedications. In this report we aim to put some questions regarding the following issues regarding multiple aspects of modern application of radiation oncology: the current application of radiation oncology; the modern role of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for both the management of primary lesions and for lymph-nodal recurrence; the management of the oligometastatic presentations; the role of brachytherapy; the aid played by the application of the organ at risk spacer (spacer OAR), fiducial markers, electromagnetic tracking systems and on-line Magnetic Resonance guided radiotherapy (MRgRT), and the role of the new opportunity represented by radiomic analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Cellini
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italia
| | - Luca Tagliaferri
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Frascino
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Rita Alitto
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Bruno Fionda
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Boldrini
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Angela Romano
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Calogero Casà
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Gian Carlo Mattiucci
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italia
- Radiation Oncology, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Tamura H, Kobashi K, Nishioka K, Yoshimura T, Hashimoto T, Shimizu S, Ito YM, Maeda Y, Sasaki M, Yamamoto K, Tamamura H, Aoyama H, Shirato H. Dosimetric advantages of daily adaptive strategy in IMPT for high-risk prostate cancer. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13531. [PMID: 35045211 PMCID: PMC8992948 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2021] [Revised: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 12/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the dosimetric advantages of daily adaptive radiotherapy (DART) in intensity‐modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for high‐risk prostate cancer by comparing estimated doses of the conventional non‐adaptive radiotherapy (NART) that irradiates according to an original treatment plan through the entire treatment and the DART that uses an adaptive treatment plan generated by using daily CT images acquired before each treatment. Methods Twenty‐three patients with prostate cancer were included. A treatment plan with 63 Gy (relative biological effectiveness (RBE)) in 21 fractions was generated using treatment planning computed tomography (CT) images assuming that all patients had high‐risk prostate cancer for which the clinical target volume (CTV) needs to include prostate and the seminal vesicle (SV) in our treatment protocol. Twenty‐one adaptive treatment plans for each patient (total 483 data sets) were generated using daily CT images, and dose distributions were calculated. Using a 3 mm set‐up uncertainty in the robust optimization, the doses to the CTV, prostate, SV, rectum, and bladder were compared. Results Estimated accumulated doses of NART and DART in the 23 patients were 60.81 ± 3.47 Gy (RBE) and 63.24 ± 1.04 Gy (RBE) for CTV D99 (p < 0.01), 62.99 ± 1.28 Gy (RBE) and 63.43 ± 1.33 Gy (RBE) for the prostate D99 (p = 0.2529), and 59.07 ± 5.19 Gy (RBE) and 63.17 ± 1.04 Gy (RBE) for SV D99 (p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed between NART and DART in the estimated accumulated dose for the rectum and bladder. Conclusion Compared with the NART, DART was shown to be a useful approach that can maintain the dose coverage to the target without increasing the dose to the organs at risk (OAR) using the 3 mm set‐up uncertainty in the robust optimization in patients with high‐risk prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroshi Tamura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.,Department of Radiological Technology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Keiji Kobashi
- Department of Radiation Medical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.,Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Kentaro Nishioka
- Department of Radiation Medical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Takaaki Yoshimura
- Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.,Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Takayuki Hashimoto
- Department of Radiation Medical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Shinichi Shimizu
- Department of Radiation Medical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.,Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Yoichi M Ito
- Data Science Center, Promotion Unit, Institute of Health Science Innovation for Medical Care, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Yoshikazu Maeda
- Proton Therapy Center, Fukui Prefectural Hospital, Fukui, Japan
| | - Makoto Sasaki
- Proton Therapy Center, Fukui Prefectural Hospital, Fukui, Japan
| | | | | | - Hidefumi Aoyama
- Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Hiroki Shirato
- Global Center for Biomedical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Hall WA, Paulson E, Li XA, Erickson B, Schultz C, Tree A, Awan M, Low DA, McDonald BA, Salzillo T, Glide-Hurst CK, Kishan AU, Fuller CD. Magnetic resonance linear accelerator technology and adaptive radiation therapy: An overview for clinicians. CA Cancer J Clin 2022; 72:34-56. [PMID: 34792808 PMCID: PMC8985054 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Revised: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT) continues to play an important role in the treatment of cancer. Adaptive RT (ART) is a novel method through which RT treatments are evolving. With the ART approach, computed tomography or magnetic resonance (MR) images are obtained as part of the treatment delivery process. This enables the adaptation of the irradiated volume to account for changes in organ and/or tumor position, movement, size, or shape that may occur over the course of treatment. The advantages and challenges of ART maybe somewhat abstract to oncologists and clinicians outside of the specialty of radiation oncology. ART is positioned to affect many different types of cancer. There is a wide spectrum of hypothesized benefits, from small toxicity improvements to meaningful gains in overall survival. The use and application of this novel technology should be understood by the oncologic community at large, such that it can be appropriately contextualized within the landscape of cancer therapies. Likewise, the need to test these advances is pressing. MR-guided ART (MRgART) is an emerging, extended modality of ART that expands upon and further advances the capabilities of ART. MRgART presents unique opportunities to iteratively improve adaptive image guidance. However, although the MRgART adaptive process advances ART to previously unattained levels, it can be more expensive, time-consuming, and complex. In this review, the authors present an overview for clinicians describing the process of ART and specifically MRgART.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- History, 20th Century
- History, 21st Century
- Humans
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Interventional/history
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Interventional/instrumentation
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Interventional/methods
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Interventional/trends
- Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging
- Neoplasms/radiotherapy
- Particle Accelerators
- Radiation Oncology/history
- Radiation Oncology/instrumentation
- Radiation Oncology/methods
- Radiation Oncology/trends
- Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/history
- Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation
- Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods
- Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/trends
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William A. Hall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Eric Paulson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - X. Allen Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Beth Erickson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Christopher Schultz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Alison Tree
- The Royal Marsden National Health Service Foundation Trust and the Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Musaddiq Awan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Daniel A. Low
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Brigid A. McDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Travis Salzillo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Carri K. Glide-Hurst
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Amar U. Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Clifton D. Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Ma TM, Neylon J, Casado M, Sharma S, Sheng K, Low D, Yang Y, Steinberg ML, Lamb J, Cao M, Kishan AU. Dosimetric impact of interfraction prostate and seminal vesicle volume changes and rotation: A post-hoc analysis of a phase III randomized trial of MRI-guided versus CT-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2021; 167:203-10. [PMID: 34979212 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.12.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2021] [Revised: 12/10/2021] [Accepted: 12/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Interfraction volumetric changes/rotations in the prostate and proximal seminal vesicles (SVs) might compromise target coverage when tight margins are used for prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). We investigated on-board MRI images from MRI-guided SBRT to better understand this. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty consecutive patients treated with MRI-guided prostate SBRT (40 Gy/5 fractions) enrolled on the MRI arm of a phase III randomized trial were included. A 2 mm isotropic margin was used for prostate and proximal SVPTV. Target volume, prostate dimensions, angles of the proximal SV on axial (angle α) and sagittal view (angle θ) were measured on a 0.35 T simulation MRI and five on-board pre-treatment MRIs. Dice coefficient of the targets and target dosimetry were calculated. RESULTS All patients experienced an isotropic increase in prostate volume during SBRT (p = 0.0016): 0.1%, 9.0%, 12.1%, 15.1%, and 14.2% (median) at fractions 1-5, respectively, regardless of baseline volume, which was significantly reduced with neoadjuvant ADT (p = 0.0042). There was minimal interfraction rotation of prostate, however, considerable variations in proximal SV angle α (median 21.5°) and angle θ (median 17.6°) were seen. Median V100% was 97.5% and 87.1% for prostate and proximal SV CTV, respectively. V95%≥95% was achieved in 94% of fractions for the prostate and in 59% for proximal SV. CONCLUSION Prostate volume consistently increased during SBRT. Interfraction prostatic rotation was minimal while rotation of the proximal SV was considerable. Prostate dosimetry was favorable, but online adaptive therapy may be indicated occasionally to account for prostatic swelling and in particular proximal SV rotations.
Collapse
|
40
|
Groen VH, Haustermans K, Pos FJ, Draulans C, Isebaert S, Monninkhof EM, Smeenk RJ, Kunze-Busch M, de Boer JCJ, van der Voort van Zijp J, Kerkmeijer LGW, van der Heide UA. Patterns of Failure Following External Beam Radiotherapy With or Without an Additional Focal Boost in the Randomized Controlled FLAME Trial for Localized Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol 2021; 82:252-257. [PMID: 34953603 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Revised: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Focal dose escalation in external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) showed an increase in 5-yr biochemical disease-free survival in the Focal Lesion Ablative Microboost in Prostate Cancer (FLAME) trial. OBJECTIVE To analyze the effect of a focal boost to intraprostatic lesions on local failure-free survival (LFS) and regional + distant metastasis-free survival (rdMFS). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Patients with intermediate- or high-risk localized prostate cancer were included in FLAME, a phase 3, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. INTERVENTION Standard treatment of 77 Gy to the entire prostate in 35 fractions was compared to an additional boost to the macroscopic tumor of up to 95 Gy during EBRT. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS LFS and rdMFS, measured via any type of imaging, were compared between the treatment arms using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. Dose-response curves were created for local failure (LF) and regional + distant metastatic failure (rdMF) using logistic regression. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS A total of 571 patients were included in the FLAME trial. Over median follow-up of 72 mo (interquartile range 58-86), focal boosting decreased LF (hazard ratio [HR] 0.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.14-0.78) and rdMF (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.35-0.93). Dose-response curves showed that a greater dose to the tumor resulted in lower LF and rdMF rates. CONCLUSIONS A clear dose-response relation for LF and rdMF was observed, suggesting that adequate focal dose escalation to intraprostatic lesions prevents undertreatment of the primary tumor, resulting in an improvement rdMF. PATIENT SUMMARY Radiotherapy is a treatment option for high-risk prostate cancer. The FLAME trial has shown that a high dose specifically targeted at the tumor within the prostate will result in better disease outcome, with less likelihood of regional and distant disease spread. The FLAME trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT01168479.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veerle H Groen
- Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Floris J Pos
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cédric Draulans
- Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sofie Isebaert
- Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Evelyn M Monninkhof
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Robert J Smeenk
- Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Martina Kunze-Busch
- Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Linda G W Kerkmeijer
- Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Elter A, Rippke C, Johnen W, Mann P, Hellwich E, Schwahofer A, Dorsch S, Buchele C, Klüter S, Karger CP. End-to-end test for fractionated online adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy using a deformable anthropomorphic pelvis phantom. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66. [PMID: 34845991 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac3e0c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Objective.In MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) for prostate cancer treatments inter-fractional anatomy changes such as bladder and rectum fillings may be corrected by an online adaption of the treatment plan. To clinically implement such complex treatment procedures, however, specific end-to-end tests are required that are able to validate the overall accuracy of all treatment steps from pre-treatment imaging to dose delivery.Approach.In this study, an end-to-end test of a fractionated and online adapted MRgRT prostate irradiation was performed using the so-called ADAM-PETer phantom. The phantom was adapted to perform 3D polymer gel (PG) dosimetry in the prostate and rectum. Furthermore, thermoluminescence detectors (TLDs) were placed at the center and on the surface of the prostate for additional dose measurements as well as for an external dose renormalization of the PG. For the end-to-end test, a total of five online adapted irradiations were applied in sequence with different bladder and rectum fillings, respectively.Main results.A good agreement of measured and planned dose was found represented by highγ-index passing rates (3%/3mmcriterion) of the PG evaluation of98.9%in the prostate and93.7%in the rectum. TLDs used for PG renormalization at the center of the prostate showed a deviation of-2.3%.Significance.The presented end-to-end test, which allows for 3D dose verification in the prostate and rectum, demonstrates the feasibility and accuracy of fractionated and online-adapted prostate irradiations in presence of inter-fractional anatomy changes. Such tests are of high clinical importance for the commissioning of new image-guided treatment procedures such as online adaptive MRgRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Elter
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Faculty of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C Rippke
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Medical Faculty, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - W Johnen
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - P Mann
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - E Hellwich
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - A Schwahofer
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - S Dorsch
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C Buchele
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Medical Faculty, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - S Klüter
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C P Karger
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
de Mol van Otterloo SR, Christodouleas JP, Blezer ELA, Akhiat H, Brown K, Choudhury A, Eggert D, Erickson BA, Daamen LA, Faivre-Finn C, Fuller CD, Goldwein J, Hafeez S, Hall E, Harrington KJ, van der Heide UA, Huddart RA, Intven MPW, Kirby AM, Lalondrelle S, McCann C, Minsky BD, Mook S, Nowee ME, Oelfke U, Orrling K, Philippens MEP, Sahgal A, Schultz CJ, Tersteeg RJHA, Tijssen RHN, Tree AC, van Triest B, Tseng CL, Hall WA, Verkooijen HM. Patterns of Care, Tolerability, and Safety of the First Cohort of Patients Treated on a Novel High-Field MR-Linac Within the MOMENTUM Study: Initial Results From a Prospective Multi-Institutional Registry. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 111:867-875. [PMID: 34265394 PMCID: PMC9764331 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2021] [Revised: 06/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE High-field magnetic resonance-linear accelerators (MR-Linacs), linear accelerators combined with a diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner and online adaptive workflow, potentially give rise to novel online anatomic and response adaptive radiation therapy paradigms. The first high-field (1.5T) MR-Linac received regulatory approval in late 2018, and little is known about clinical use, patient tolerability of daily high-field MRI, and toxicity of treatments. Herein we report the initial experience within the MOMENTUM Study (NCT04075305), a prospective international registry of the MR-Linac Consortium. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients were included between February 2019 and October 2020 at 7 institutions in 4 countries. We used descriptive statistics to describe the patterns of care, tolerability (the percentage of patients discontinuing their course early), and safety (grade 3-5 Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v.5 acute toxicity within 3 months after the end of treatment). RESULTS A total 943 patients participated in the MOMENTUM Study, 702 of whom had complete baseline data at the time of this analysis. Patients were primarily male (79%) with a median age of 68 years (range, 22-93) and were treated for 39 different indications. The most frequent indications were prostate (40%), oligometastatic lymph node (17%), brain (12%), and rectal (10%) cancers. The median number of fractions was 5 (range, 1-35). Six patients discontinued MR-Linac treatments, but none due to an inability to tolerate repeated high-field MRI. Of the 415 patients with complete data on acute toxicity at 3-month follow-up, 18 (4%) patients experienced grade 3 acute toxicity related to radiation. No grade 4 or 5 acute toxicity related to radiation was observed. CONCLUSIONS In the first 21 months of our study, patterns of care were diverse with respect to clinical utilization, body sites, and radiation prescriptions. No patient discontinued treatment due to inability to tolerate daily high-field MRI scans, and the acute radiation toxicity experience was encouraging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Erwin L A Blezer
- Division of Imaging, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Ananya Choudhury
- The University of Manchester and The Christie National Health Service Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | - Beth A Erickson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Lois A Daamen
- Division of Imaging, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Corinne Faivre-Finn
- The University of Manchester and The Christie National Health Service Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Clifton D Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Shaista Hafeez
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer, London, United Kingdom
| | - Emma Hall
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kevin J Harrington
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer, London, United Kingdom
| | - Uulke A van der Heide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Robert A Huddart
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer, London, United Kingdom
| | - Martijn P W Intven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Anna M Kirby
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer, London, United Kingdom
| | - Susan Lalondrelle
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer, London, United Kingdom
| | - Claire McCann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre/Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Bruce D Minsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Stella Mook
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Marlies E Nowee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Uwe Oelfke
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre/Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Christopher J Schultz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Robbert J H A Tersteeg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Rob H N Tijssen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Alison C Tree
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer, London, United Kingdom
| | - Baukelien van Triest
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Chia-Lin Tseng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre/Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario
| | - William A Hall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Helena M Verkooijen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; Division of Imaging, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Tamihardja J, Cirsi S, Kessler P, Razinskas G, Exner F, Richter A, Polat B, Flentje M. Cone beam CT-based dose accumulation and analysis of delivered dose to the dominant intraprostatic lesion in primary radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:205. [PMID: 34702305 PMCID: PMC8549146 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01933-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Evaluation of delivered dose to the dominant intraprostatic lesion (DIL) for moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy of prostate cancer by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based dose accumulation and target coverage analysis. Methods Twenty-three patients with localized prostate cancer treated with moderately hypofractionated prostate radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) between December 2016 and February 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Included patients were required to have an identifiable DIL on bi-parametric planning magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). After import into the RayStation treatment planning system and application of a step-wise density override, the fractional doses were computed on each CBCT and were consecutively mapped onto the planning CT via a deformation vector field derived from deformable image registration. Fractional doses were accumulated for all CBCTs and interpolated for missing CBCTs, resulting in the delivered dose for PTVDIL, PTVBoost, PTV, and the organs at risk. The location of the index lesions was recorded according to the sector map of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) Version 2.1. Target coverage of the index lesions was evaluated and stratified for location. Results In total, 338 CBCTs were available for analysis. Dose accumulation target coverage of PTVDIL, PTVBoost, and PTV was excellent and no cases of underdosage in DMean, D95%, D02%, and D98% could be detected. Delivered rectum DMean did not significantly differ from the planned dose. Bladder mean DMean was higher than planned with 19.4 ± 7.4 Gy versus 18.8 ± 7.5 Gy, p < 0.001. The penile bulb showed a decreased delivered mean DMean with 29.1 ± 14.0 Gy versus 29.8 ± 14.4 Gy, p < 0.001. Dorsal DILs, defined as DILs in the posterior medial peripheral zone of the prostate, showed a significantly lower delivered dose with a mean DMean difference of 2.2 Gy (95% CI 1.3–3.1 Gy, p < 0.001) compared to ventral lesions. Conclusions CBCT-based dose accumulation showed an adequate delivered dose to the dominant intraprostatic lesion and organs at risk within planning limits. Cautious evaluation of the target coverage for index lesions adjacent to the rectum is warranted to avoid underdosage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jörg Tamihardja
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
| | - Sinan Cirsi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Patrick Kessler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Gary Razinskas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Florian Exner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Anne Richter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Bülent Polat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Michael Flentje
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Li M, Zhang Q, Yang K. Role of MRI-Based Functional Imaging in Improving the Therapeutic Index of Radiotherapy in Cancer Treatment. Front Oncol 2021; 11:645177. [PMID: 34513659 PMCID: PMC8429950 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.645177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Advances in radiation technology, such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), have largely enabled a biological dose escalation of the target volume (TV) and reduce the dose to adjacent tissues or organs at risk (OARs). However, the risk of radiation-induced injury increases as more radiation dose utilized during radiation therapy (RT), which predominantly limits further increases in TV dose distribution and reduces the local control rate. Thus, the accurate target delineation is crucial. Recently, technological improvements for precise target delineation have obtained more attention in the field of RT. The addition of functional imaging to RT can provide a more accurate anatomy of the tumor and normal tissues (such as location and size), along with biological information that aids to optimize the therapeutic index (TI) of RT. In this review, we discuss the application of some common MRI-based functional imaging techniques in clinical practice. In addition, we summarize the main challenges and prospects of these imaging technologies, expecting more inspiring developments and more productive research paths in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mei Li
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Ministry of Education, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,West China School of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Qin Zhang
- West China School of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Kaixuan Yang
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Ministry of Education, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Zhong J, Slevin F, Scarsbrook AF, Serra M, Choudhury A, Hoskin PJ, Brown S, Henry AM. Salvage Reirradiation Options for Locally Recurrent Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review. Front Oncol 2021; 11:681448. [PMID: 34568012 PMCID: PMC8459721 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.681448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reirradiation using brachytherapy (BT) and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) are salvage strategies with locally radiorecurrent prostate cancer. This systematic review describes the oncologic and toxicity outcomes for salvage BT and EBRT [including Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)]. METHODS An International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) registered (#211875) study was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. EMBASE and MEDLINE databases were searched from inception to December 2020. For BT, both low dose rate (LDR) and high dose rate (HDR) BT techniques were included. Two authors independently assessed study quality using the 18-item Modified Delphi technique. RESULTS A total of 39 eligible studies comprising 1967 patients were included (28 BT and 11 SBRT). In 35 studies (90%), the design was single centre and/or retrospective and no randomised prospective studies were found. Twelve BT studies used LDR only, 11 HDR only, 4 LDR or HDR and 1 pulsed-dose rate only. All EBRT studies used SBRT exclusively, four with Cyberknife alone and 7 using both Cyberknife and conventional linear accelerator treatments. Median (range) modified Delphi quality score was 15 (6-18). Median (range) follow-up was 47.5 months (13-108) (BT) and 25.4 months (21-44) (SBRT). For the LDR-BT studies, the median (range) 2-year and 5-year bRFS rates were 71% (48-89.5) and 52.5% (20-79). For the HDR-BT studies, the median (range) 2-year and 5-year bRFS rates were 74% (63-89) and 51% (45-65). For the SBRT studies, the median (range) 2-year bRFS for the SBRT group was 54.9% (40-80). Mean (range) acute and late grade≥3 GU toxicity rates for LDR-BT/HDR-BT/SBRT were 7.4%(0-14)/2%(0-14)/2.7%(0-8.7) and 13.6%(0-30)/7.9%(0-21.3%)/2.7%(0-8%). Mean (range) acute and late grade≥3 GI toxicity rates for LDR-BT/HDR-BT/SBRT were 6.5%(0-19)/0%/0.5%(0-4%) and 6.4%(0-20)/0.1%(0-0.9)/0.2%(0-1.5). One third of studies included Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). CONCLUSIONS Salvage reirradiation of radiorecurrent prostate cancer using HDR-BT or SBRT provides similar biochemical control and acceptable late toxicity. Salvage LDR-BT is associated with higher late GU/GI toxicity. Challenges exist in comparing BT and SBRT from inconsistencies in reporting with missing data, and prospective randomised trials are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jim Zhong
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Leeds Cancer Centre, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leeds Cancer Centre, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Finbar Slevin
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leeds Cancer Centre, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew F. Scarsbrook
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Leeds Cancer Centre, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Maria Serra
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Ananya Choudhury
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom
- The Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Peter J. Hoskin
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom
- The Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Brown
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Ann M. Henry
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leeds Cancer Centre, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Al-Hallaq H, Batista V, Kügele M, Ford E, Viscariello N, Meyer J. The role of surface-guided radiation therapy for improving patient safety. Radiother Oncol 2021; 163:229-36. [PMID: 34453955 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2021] [Revised: 07/27/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Emerging data indicates SGRT could improve safety and quality by preventing errors in its capacity as an independent system in the treatment room. The aim of this work is to investigate the utility of SGRT in the context of safety and quality. Three incident learning systems (ILS) were reviewed to categorize and quantify errors that could have been prevented with SGRT: SAFRON (International Atomic Energy Agency), UW-ILS (University of Washington) and AvIC (Skåne University Hospital). A total of 849/9737 events occurred during the pre-treatment review/verification and treatment stages. Of these, 179 (21%) events were predicted to have been preventable with SGRT. The most common preventable events were wrong isocentre (43%) and incorrect accessories (34%), which appeared at comparable rates among SAFRON and UW-ILS. The proportion of events due to wrong accessories was much smaller in the AvIC ILS, which may be attributable to the mandatory use of SGRT in Sweden. Several case scenarios are presented to demonstrate that SGRT operates as a valuable complement to other quality-improvement tools routinely used in radiotherapy. Cases are noted in which SGRT itself caused incidents. These were mostly related to workflow issues and were of low severity. Severity data indicated that events with the potential to be mitigated by SGRT were of higher severity for all categories except wrong accessories. Improved vendor integration of SGRT systems within the overall workflow could further enhance its clinical utility. SGRT is a valuable tool with the potential to increase patient safety and treatment quality in radiotherapy.
Collapse
|
47
|
Sandoval ML, Youssef I, Latifi K, Grass GD, Torres-Roca J, Rosenberg S, Yamoah K, Johnstone PA. Non-Adaptive MR-Guided Radiotherapy for Prostate SBRT: Less Time, Equal Results. J Clin Med 2021; 10:3396. [PMID: 34362179 PMCID: PMC8347281 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10153396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Revised: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 07/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is widely utilized for treatment of localized prostate cancer. Magnetic-resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) was introduced in 2014 and has recently been implemented in SBRT for prostate cancer as it provides an opportunity for smaller margins and adaptive daily planning. Currently, the only publications of MRgRT for prostate SBRT describe European clinical experiences which utilized adaptive planning. However, adaptive planning adds significantly to the time required for daily treatment. OBJECTIVES Since prostate SBRT has demonstrated acceptable toxicity for several years, we did not consider daily adaptation critical to the process of prostate SBRT. After Institutional Review Board approval, we analyzed and now report our experience using MRgRT without adaptation. METHODS Between 25 September 2019 and 21 December 2020, 35 consecutive patients were treated with MRgRT prostate SBRT at our center. Patients treated with MRgRT included favorable intermediate risk (43%) and unfavorable intermediate risk (54%), and only one patient had low-risk prostate cancer. Nine patients (25%) received adjuvant leuprolide for a median of 4.5 months (range 4-6 m). Our clinical pathway allows for a maximum prostate gland volume of 60 cc; median prostate volume of this cohort was 35.0 cc (range 17-58.4 cc). Median pre-treatment PSA was 6.30 (range 2.55-16.77). Each patient was treated with 36.25 Gy delivered in five fractions over 2 weeks with urethral sparing to a maximal dose of 35 Gy. Target volumes included the prostate gland and proximal seminal vesicles with a 3 mm margin. RESULTS Median follow-up as of 26 May 2021 was 11.97 months (range 4.37-19.80). First follow-up data are available for all patients, with a median of 1.10 month from completion of treatment (0.63-3.40). The median PSA at first visit was 2.75 (range 0.02-9.00) with a median AUA symptom score of 9 (range 1-24). Second follow-up data are available for 34 patients at a median of 4.45 months (range 2.57-8.90). At second follow-up, the median PSA was 1.60 (range 0.02-5.40) with a median AUA symptom score of 6 (range 1-33). Seventeen patients had third follow-up data with a median of 9.77 months (range 4.70-12.33) after SBRT. The median PSA was 1.13 (range 0.02-4.73) with an AUA score of 9 (2-22) at the third follow-up. We observed a statistically significant decrease in PSA between pre-treatment and at first follow-up (p < 0.005). The most common toxicity was grade 2 urethritis, managed in all cases by tamsulosin. One patient developed grade 2 tenesmus relieved by topical steroids. No cases of grade ≥ 3 toxicity were seen in our patient population. CONCLUSIONS By avoiding the extra time required for plan adaptation, MRgRT without daily adaptation allows for successful prostate SBRT with manageable toxicity. We continue to reserve our limited adaptive treatment slots for preoperative pancreatic and ultra-central lung SBRT patients, which require time-intensive respiratory gating and adaptive planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria L. Sandoval
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA; (M.L.S.); (K.L.); (G.D.G.); (J.T.-R.); (S.R.); (K.Y.)
| | - Irini Youssef
- Department of Radiation Oncology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USA;
| | - Kujtim Latifi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA; (M.L.S.); (K.L.); (G.D.G.); (J.T.-R.); (S.R.); (K.Y.)
| | - G. Daniel Grass
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA; (M.L.S.); (K.L.); (G.D.G.); (J.T.-R.); (S.R.); (K.Y.)
| | - Javier Torres-Roca
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA; (M.L.S.); (K.L.); (G.D.G.); (J.T.-R.); (S.R.); (K.Y.)
| | - Stephen Rosenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA; (M.L.S.); (K.L.); (G.D.G.); (J.T.-R.); (S.R.); (K.Y.)
| | - Kosj Yamoah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA; (M.L.S.); (K.L.); (G.D.G.); (J.T.-R.); (S.R.); (K.Y.)
| | - Peter A. Johnstone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA; (M.L.S.); (K.L.); (G.D.G.); (J.T.-R.); (S.R.); (K.Y.)
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Wegener D, Zips D, Gani C, Boeke S, Nikolaou K, Othman AE, Almansour H, Paulsen F, Müller AC. [Primary treatment of prostate cancer using 1.5 T MR-linear accelerator]. Radiologe 2021; 61:839-845. [PMID: 34297139 PMCID: PMC8410708 DOI: 10.1007/s00117-021-00882-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Hintergrund Der potenzielle Nutzen des verbesserten Weichteilkontrastes von MR-Sequenzen gegenüber der Computertomographie (CT) für die Radiotherapie des Prostatakarzinoms ist bekannt und führt zu konsistenteren und kleineren Zielvolumina sowie verbesserter Risikoorganschonung. Hybridgeräte aus Magnetresonanztomographie (MRT) und Linearbeschleuniger (MR-Linac) stellen eine neue vielversprechende Erweiterung der radioonkologischen Therapieoptionen dar. Material und Methoden Dieser Artikel gibt eine Übersicht über bisherige Erfahrungen, Indikationen, Vorteile und Herausforderungen für die Radiotherapie des primären Prostatakarzinoms mit dem 1,5-T-MR-Linac. Ergebnisse Alle strahlentherapeutischen Therapieindikationen für das primäre Prostatakarzinom können mit dem 1,5-T-MR-Linac abgedeckt werden. Die potenziellen Vorteile umfassen die tägliche MR-basierte Lagekontrolle in Bestrahlungsposition und die Möglichkeit der täglichen Echtzeitanpassung des Bestrahlungsplans an die aktuelle Anatomie der Beckenorgane (adaptive Strahlentherapie). Zusätzlich werden am 1,5-T-MR-Linac funktionelle MRT-Sequenzen für individuelles Response-Assessment für die Therapieanpassung untersucht. Dadurch soll das therapeutische Fenster weiter optimiert werden. Herausforderungen stellen u. a. die technische Komplexität und die Dauer der Behandlungssitzung dar. Schlussfolgerung Der 1,5-T-MR-Linac erweitert das radioonkologische Spektrum in der Therapie des Prostatakarzinoms und bietet Vorteile durch tagesaktuelle MRT-basierte Zielvolumendefinition und Planadaptation. Weitere klinische Untersuchungen sind notwendig, um die Patienten zu identifizieren, die von der Behandlung am MR-Linac gegenüber anderen strahlentherapeutischen Methoden besonders profitieren.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Wegener
- Universitätsklinik für Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland.
| | - Daniel Zips
- Universitätsklinik für Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - Cihan Gani
- Universitätsklinik für Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - Simon Boeke
- Universitätsklinik für Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - Konstantin Nikolaou
- Universitätsklinik für Radiologie, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - Ahmed E Othman
- Universitätsklinik für Radiologie, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
- Universitätsklink für Neuroradiologie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Deutschland
| | - Haidara Almansour
- Universitätsklinik für Radiologie, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - Frank Paulsen
- Universitätsklinik für Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Hehakaya C, van der Voort van Zyp JRN, Vanneste BGL, Grutters JPC, Grobbee DE, Verkooijen HM, Frederix GWJ. Early health economic analysis of 1.5 T MRI-guided radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: Decision analytic modelling. Radiother Oncol 2021; 161:74-82. [PMID: 34089754 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.05.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2021] [Revised: 05/21/2021] [Accepted: 05/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging radiotherapy linear accelerator (MR-Linac) is gaining interest for treatment of localized prostate cancer. Clinical evidence is lacking and it therefore remains uncertain whether MR-Linac is cost-effective. An early health economic analysis was performed to calculate the necessary relative reduction in complications and the maximum price of MR-Linac (5 fractions) to be cost-effective compared to 5, 20 and 39 fractionation schedules of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS A state transition model was developed for men with localized prostate cancer. Complication rates such as grade ≥2 urinary, grade ≥2 bowel and sexual complications, and utilities were based on systematic literature searches. Costs were estimated from a Dutch healthcare perspective. Threshold analyses were performed to identify the thresholds of complications and costs for MR-Linac to be cost-effective, while holding other outcomes such as biochemical progression and mortality constant. One-way sensitivity analyses were performed to outline uncertainty outcomes. RESULTS At €6460 per patient, no reductions in complications were needed to consider MR-Linac cost-effective compared to EBRT 20 and 39 fractions. Compared to EBRT 5 fractions and LDR brachytherapy, MR-Linac was found to be cost-effective when complications are relatively reduced by 54% and 66% respectively. Results are highly sensitive to the utilities of urinary, bowel and sexual complications and the probability of biochemical progression. CONCLUSIONS MR-Linac is found to be cost-effective compared to 20 and 39 fractions EBRT at baseline. For MR-Linac to become cost-effective over 5 fractions EBRT and LDR brachytherapy, it has to reduce complications substantially or be offered at lower costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charisma Hehakaya
- Division of Imaging & Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands; Julius Clinical, Zeist, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Ben G L Vanneste
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MAASTRO Clinic, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Janneke P C Grutters
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Diederick E Grobbee
- Julius Clinical, Zeist, The Netherlands; Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands; Utrecht University, The Netherlands
| | - Helena M Verkooijen
- Division of Imaging & Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands; Utrecht University, The Netherlands
| | - Geert W J Frederix
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|