Clinical Evaluation of an Abbreviated Contrast-Enhanced Whole-Body MRI for Oncologic Follow-Up Imaging

Whole-Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for Staging Melanoma Patients in Direct Comparison to Computed Tomography (CT): Results from a Prospective Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/CT and PET/MRI Study

PURPOSE

The consideration of radiation exposure is becoming more important in metastatic melanoma due to improved prognoses. The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the diagnostic performance of whole-body (WB) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in comparison to computed tomography (CT) with ¹⁸F-FDG positron emission tomography (PET)/CT and ¹⁸F-PET/MRI together with a follow-up as the reference standard.

METHODS

Between April 2014 and April 2018, a total of 57 patients (25 females, mean age of 64 ± 12 years) underwent WB-PET/CT and WB-PET/MRI on the same day. The CT and MRI scans were independently evaluated by two radiologists who were blinded to the patients' information. The reference standard was evaluated by two nuclear medicine specialists. The findings were categorized into different regions: lymph nodes/soft tissue (I), lungs (II), abdomen/pelvis (III), and bone (IV). A comparative analysis was conducted for all the documented findings. Inter-reader reliability was assessed using Bland-Altman procedures, and McNemar's test was utilized to determine the differences between the readers and the methods.

RESULTS

Out of the 57 patients, 50 were diagnosed with metastases in two or more regions, with the majority being found in region I. The accuracies of CT and MRI did not show significant differences, except in region II where CT detected more metastases compared to MRI (0.90 vs. 0.68, p = 0.008). On the other hand, MRI had a higher detection rate in region IV compared to CT (0.89 vs. 0.61, p > 0.05). The level of agreement between the readers varied depending on the number of metastases and the specific region, with the highest agreement observed in region III and the lowest observed in region I.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with advanced melanoma, WB-MRI has the potential to serve as an alternative to CT with comparable diagnostic accuracy and confidence across most regions. The observed limited sensitivity for the detection of pulmonary lesions might be improved through dedicated lung imaging sequences.

Advances in Bone Marrow Imaging: Strengths and Limitations from a Clinical Perspective

Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains the modality of choice to image bone marrow. However, the last few decades have witnessed the emergence and development of novel MRI techniques, such as chemical shift imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and whole-body MRI, as well as spectral computed tomography and nuclear medicine techniques. We summarize the technical bases behind these methods, in relation to the common physiologic and pathologic processes involving the bone marrow. We present the strengths and limitations of these imaging methods and consider their added value compared with conventional imaging in assessing non-neoplastic disorders like septic, rheumatologic, traumatic, and metabolic conditions. The potential usefulness of these methods to differentiate between benign and malignant bone marrow lesions is discussed. Finally, we consider the limitations hampering a more widespread use of these techniques in clinical practice.

MRI techniques for immunotherapy monitoring

MRI is a widely available clinical tool for cancer diagnosis and treatment monitoring. MRI provides excellent soft tissue imaging, using a wide range of contrast mechanisms, and can non-invasively detect tissue metabolites. These approaches can be used to distinguish cancer from normal tissues, to stratify tumor aggressiveness, and to identify changes within both the tumor and its microenvironment in response to therapy. In this review, the role of MRI in immunotherapy monitoring will be discussed and how it could be utilized in the future to address some of the unique clinical questions that arise from immunotherapy. For example, MRI could play a role in identifying pseudoprogression, mixed response, T cell infiltration, cell tracking, and some of the characteristic immune-related adverse events associated with these agents. The factors to be considered when developing MRI imaging biomarkers for immunotherapy will be reviewed. Finally, the advantages and limitations of each approach will be discussed, as well as the challenges for future clinical translation into routine clinical care. Given the increasing use of immunotherapy in a wide range of cancers and the ability of MRI to detect the microstructural and functional changes associated with successful response to immunotherapy, the technique has great potential for more widespread and routine use in the future for these applications.