1
|
Hajri R, Nicod-Lalonde M, Hottinger AF, Prior JO, Dunet V. Prediction of Glioma Grade and IDH Status Using 18F-FET PET/CT Dynamic and Multiparametric Texture Analysis. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:2604. [PMID: 37568967 PMCID: PMC10417545 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13152604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Revised: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) represent an independent predictor of better survival in patients with gliomas. We aimed to assess grade and IDH mutation status in patients with untreated gliomas, by evaluating the respective value of 18F-FET PET/CT via dynamic and texture analyses. A total of 73 patients (male: 48, median age: 47) who underwent an 18F-FET PET/CT for initial glioma evaluation were retrospectively included. IDH status was available in 61 patients (20 patients with WHO grade 2 gliomas, 41 with grade 3-4 gliomas). Time-activity curve type and 20 parameters obtained from static analysis using LIFEx© v6.30 software were recorded. Respective performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and stepwise multivariate regression analysis adjusted for patients' age and sex. The time-activity curve type and texture parameters derived from the static parameters showed satisfactory-to-good performance in predicting glioma grade and IDH status. Both time-activity curve type (stepwise OR: 101.6 (95% CI: 5.76-1791), p = 0.002) and NGLDM coarseness (stepwise OR: 2.08 × 1043 (95% CI: 2.76 × 1012-1.57 × 1074), p = 0.006) were independent predictors of glioma grade. No independent predictor of IDH status was found. Dynamic and texture analyses of 18F-FET PET/CT have limited predictive value for IDH status when adjusted for confounding factors. However, they both help predict glioma grade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rami Hajri
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland;
| | - Marie Nicod-Lalonde
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Lausanne University Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (M.N.-L.); (J.O.P.)
| | - Andreas F. Hottinger
- Department of Neurology, Lausanne University Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland;
- Lukas Lundin & Family Brain Tumor Research Center, Lausanne University Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - John O. Prior
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Lausanne University Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (M.N.-L.); (J.O.P.)
| | - Vincent Dunet
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Elahmadawy MA, El-Ayadi M, Ahmed S, Refaat A, Eltaoudy MH, Maher E, Taha H, Elbeltagy M. F18-FET PET in pediatric brain tumors: integrative analysis of image derived parameters and clinico-pathological data. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 67:46-56. [PMID: 33300749 DOI: 10.23736/s1824-4785.20.03267-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND F18-FET PET has an established diagnostic role in adult brain gliomas. In this study we analyzed image derived static and dynamic parameters with available conventional MRI, histological, clinical and follow-up data in assessment of pediatric brain tumor patients at different stages of the disease. METHODS Forty-four pediatric patients with median age 7 years, diagnosed with brain tumors and underwent forty-seven 18F-FET PET scans either initially (20 scans) or post-therapy (27 scans) were enrolled. Standardized analysis of summed FET PET images early from 10-20 min and late from 30-40 min post-injection were used for static (mean and maximum tumor to brain ratio [TBR] and biological tumor volume [BTV]) parameters evaluation as well as the time activity curve [TAC]. RESULTS Nineteen out of 20 initially assessed patients had pathologically and/or clinico-radiologically proven neoplastic lesions and one patient had pathologically proven abscess. Receiver operator curve (ROC) marked early TBR max 2.95, early TBR mean 1.76, late TBR max 2.5 and late TBR mean 1.74 as discriminator points with diagnostic accuracy reaching 90% when TBR max was combined with dynamic parameters. Significant association was found between initial FET scans, early and late BTV and event free survival (EFS) (P value=0.042 and 0.005 respectively). In post-therapy assessment, the diagnostic accuracy of conventional MRI was 81.48% when used alone and 96.30% when combined with F18-FET PET scan findings. A cutoff point of 3.2 cm3 for late BTV, in post-therapy scans, was successfully marked as a predictor for therapy response (P value 0.042) and was significantly associated with EFS (P value 0.002). In FET-avid / MRI non-enhancing lesions, early TBR max was able to detect highly malignant processes (high-grade tumors in initial scans and residue/recurrence in post-therapy scans) with 80% sensitivity and 100% specificity when cutoff value of 2.25 was used (P value=0.024). In patients with FET-avid brainstem lesions, whether enhancing or non-enhancing in MRI scans, 81.8% were associated with high risk diagnoses and 68.2% of them were associated with poor therapy outcome. The degree of FET uptake matched tumor-grading, but did not show significant association with OS or EFS (P value>0.05). CONCLUSIONS F18-FET PET seems to be an evolving pediatric neuro-imaging technique with valuable diagnostic and prognostic information at initial and post-therapy evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mai A Elahmadawy
- Unit of Nuclear Medicine, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt - .,Children's Cancer Hospital, Cairo, Egypt -
| | - Moatasem El-Ayadi
- Children's Cancer Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.,Department of Pediatric Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Soha Ahmed
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Aswan University, Aswan, Egypt.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Children's Cancer Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Amal Refaat
- Children's Cancer Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.,Department of Radio-Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Magdy H Eltaoudy
- Cyclotron Facility, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Children's Cancer Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Eslam Maher
- Department of Clinical Research, Children's Cancer Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Hala Taha
- Children's Cancer Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.,Department of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Mohamed Elbeltagy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Children's Cancer Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.,Kasr El-Ainy School of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Henssen D, Meijer F, Verburg FA, Smits M. Challenges and opportunities for advanced neuroimaging of glioblastoma. Br J Radiol 2023; 96:20211232. [PMID: 36062962 PMCID: PMC10997013 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20211232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Revised: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma is the most aggressive of glial tumours in adults. On conventional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, these tumours are observed as irregular enhancing lesions with areas of infiltrating tumour and cortical expansion. More advanced imaging techniques including diffusion-weighted MRI, perfusion-weighted MRI, MR spectroscopy and positron emission tomography (PET) imaging have found widespread application to diagnostic challenges in the setting of first diagnosis, treatment planning and follow-up. This review aims to educate readers with regard to the strengths and weaknesses of the clinical application of these imaging techniques. For example, this review shows that the (semi)quantitative analysis of the mentioned advanced imaging tools was found useful for assessing tumour aggressiveness and tumour extent, and aids in the differentiation of tumour progression from treatment-related effects. Although these techniques may aid in the diagnostic work-up and (post-)treatment phase of glioblastoma, so far no unequivocal imaging strategy is available. Furthermore, the use and further development of artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools could greatly enhance neuroradiological practice by automating labour-intensive tasks such as tumour measurements, and by providing additional diagnostic information such as prediction of tumour genotype. Nevertheless, due to the fact that advanced imaging and AI-diagnostics is not part of response assessment criteria, there is no harmonised guidance on their use, while at the same time the lack of standardisation severely hampers the definition of uniform guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dylan Henssen
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud university medical
center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Frederick Meijer
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud university medical
center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Frederik A. Verburg
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud university medical
center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marion Smits
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud university medical
center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pyka T, Krzyzanowska I, Rominger A, Delbridge C, Meyer B, Boeckh-Behrens T, Zimmer C, Gempt J. Multiparametric Characterization of Intracranial Gliomas Using Dynamic [18F]FET-PET and Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12. [PMID: 36292019 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12102331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Revised: 09/17/2022] [Accepted: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Both static and dynamic O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine-(FET)-PET and 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) are useful tools for grading and prognostication in gliomas. However, little is known about the potential of multimodal imaging comprising both procedures. We therefore acquired NAA/Cr and Cho/Cr ratios in multi-voxel MRS as well as FET-PET parameters in 67 glioma patients and determined multiparametric parameter combinations. Using receiver operating characteristics, differentiation between low-grade and high-grade glioma was possible by static FET-PET (area under the curve (AUC) 0.86, p = 0.001), time-to-peak (TTP; AUC 0.79, p = 0.049), and using the Cho/Cr ratio (AUC 0.72, p = 0.039), while the multimodal analysis led to improved discrimination with an AUC of 0.97 (p = 0.001). In order to distinguish glioblastoma from non-glioblastoma, MRS (NAA/Cr ratio, AUC 0.66, p = 0.031), and dynamic FET-PET (AUC 0.88, p = 0.001) were superior to static FET imaging. The multimodal analysis increased the accuracy with an AUC of 0.97 (p < 0.001). In the survival analysis, PET parameters, but not spectroscopy, were significantly correlated with overall survival (OS, static PET p = 0.014, TTP p = 0.012), still, the multiparametric analysis, including MRS, was also useful for the prediction of OS (p = 0.002). In conclusion, FET-PET and MRS provide complementary information to better characterize gliomas before therapy, which is particularly interesting with respect to the increasing use of hybrid PET/MRI for brain tumors.
Collapse
|
5
|
Castello A, Castellani M, Florimonte L, Ciccariello G, Mansi L, Lopci E. PET radiotracers in glioma: a review of clinical indications and evidence. Clin Transl Imaging 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s40336-022-00523-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
6
|
Kure AJ, Savas H, Hijaz TA, Hussaini SF, Korutz AW. Advancements in Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Applications to Diagnostic Challenges in Neuroradiology. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2021; 42:434-451. [PMID: 34537113 DOI: 10.1053/j.sult.2021.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Since the clinical adoption of magnetic resonance (MR) in medical imaging, MR has proven to be a workhorse in diagnostic neuroradiology, with the ability to provide superb anatomic detail as well as additional functional and physiologic data, depending on the techniques utilized. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography has also shown irreplaceable diagnostic value in certain disease processes of the central nervous system by providing molecular and metabolic information through the development of numerous disease-specific PET tracers, many of which can be utilized as a diagnostic technique in and of themselves or can provide a valuable adjunct to information derived from MR. Despite these advances, many challenges still remain in neuroradiology, particularly in malignancy, neurodegenerative disease, epilepsy, and cerebrovascular disease. Through improvements in attenuation correction, motion correction, and PET detectors, combining the 2 modalities of PET and MR through simultaneous imaging has proven feasible and allows for improved spatial and temporal resolution without compromising either of the 2 individual modalities. The complementary information offered by both technologies has provided increased diagnostic accuracy in both research and many clinical applications in neuroradiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J Kure
- Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
| | - Hatice Savas
- Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
| | - Tarek A Hijaz
- Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
| | - Syed F Hussaini
- Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
| | - Alexander W Korutz
- Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yan LF, Sun YZ, Zhao SS, Hu YC, Han Y, Li G, Zhang X, Tian Q, Liu ZC, Yang Y, Nan HY, Yu Y, Sun Q, Zhang J, Chen P, Hu B, Li F, Han TH, Wang W, Cui GB. Perfusion, Diffusion, Or Brain Tumor Barrier Integrity: Which Represents The Glioma Features Best? Cancer Manag Res 2019; 11:9989-10000. [PMID: 31819632 PMCID: PMC6885544 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s197839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2018] [Accepted: 09/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study aims to incorporate informative histogram indicator analyses and advanced multimodal MRI parameters to differentiate low-grade gliomas (LGGs) from high-grade gliomas (HGGs) and to explore the features associated with patients’ survival. Patients and methods A total of 120 patients with pathologically confirmed LGGs or HGGs receiving conventional and advanced MRI such as three-dimensional arterial spin labeling (3D-ASL), intravoxel incoherent motion-diffusion weighted imaging (IVIM-DWI), and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) were included. The mean and histogram indicators from advanced MRI were calculated from the entire tumor. The efficacies of a single indicator or multiple parameters were tested in distinguishing HGGs from LGGs and predicting patients’ survival. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and multivariable stepwise logistic regression were used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacies. Leave-one-out cross-validation was further used to validate the accuracy of the parameter sets in glioma grading. Log-rank test using the Kaplan–Meier curve was utilized to predict patients’ survival. Results Overall, parameters from DCE-MRI performed better than those from 3D-ASL or IVIM-DWI in both glioma grading and survival prediction. The histogram metrics of Ve were demonstrated to have higher accuracies (the accuracies for Extended Tofts_Vemean and Extended Tofts_Vemedian were 68.33% and 71.67%, respectively, while those for the Incremental_Vemean and Incremental_Ve75th were 68.33% and 72.50%, respectively) in grading LGGs from HGGs. The combination of Tofts_Ve histogram metrics was the one with the highest accuracy (81.67%) and area under ROC curve (AUC = 0.840). On the other hand, Patlak_Ktrans95th (AUC = 0.9265) and Extended Tofts_Ve95th (AUC = 0.9154) performed better than their corresponding means (Patlak_Ktransmean: AUC = 0.9118 and Extended Tofts_Vemean: AUC = 0.9044) in predicting patients’ overall survival (OS) at 18-month follow-up. Conclusion DCE-MRI-derived histogram features from the entire tumor were promising metrics for glioma grading and OS prediction. Combining single modal histogram features improved glioma grading. Trial registration NCT 02622620.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin-Feng Yan
- Department of Radiology & Functional and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Shaanxi Province, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710038, People's Republic of China
| | - Ying-Zhi Sun
- Department of Radiology & Functional and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Shaanxi Province, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710038, People's Republic of China
| | - Sha-Sha Zhao
- Department of Radiology & Functional and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Shaanxi Province, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710038, People's Republic of China
| | - Yu-Chuan Hu
- Department of Radiology & Functional and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Shaanxi Province, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710038, People's Republic of China
| | - Yu Han
- Department of Radiology & Functional and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Shaanxi Province, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710038, People's Republic of China
| | - Gang Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710038, People's Republic of China
| | - Xin Zhang
- Department of Radiology & Functional and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Shaanxi Province, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710038, People's Republic of China
| | - Qiang Tian
- Department of Radiology & Functional and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Shaanxi Province, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710038, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhi-Cheng Liu
- Department of Radiology & Functional and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Shaanxi Province, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710038, People's Republic of China
| | - Yang Yang
- Department of Radiology & Functional and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Shaanxi Province, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710038, People's Republic of China
| | - Hai-Yan Nan
- Department of Radiology & Functional and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Shaanxi Province, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710038, People's Republic of China
| | - Ying Yu
- Department of Radiology & Functional and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Shaanxi Province, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710038, People's Republic of China
| | - Qian Sun
- Department of Radiology & Functional and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Shaanxi Province, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710038, People's Republic of China
| | - Jin Zhang
- Department of Radiology & Functional and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Shaanxi Province, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710038, People's Republic of China
| | - Ping Chen
- Department of Radiology & Functional and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Shaanxi Province, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710038, People's Republic of China
| | - Bo Hu
- Department of Radiology & Functional and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Shaanxi Province, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710038, People's Republic of China
| | - Fei Li
- Student Brigade, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710032, People's Republic of China
| | - Teng-Hui Han
- Student Brigade, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710032, People's Republic of China
| | - Wen Wang
- Department of Radiology & Functional and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Shaanxi Province, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710038, People's Republic of China
| | - Guang-Bin Cui
- Department of Radiology & Functional and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Shaanxi Province, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710038, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Albatly AA, Alsamarah AT, Alhawas A, Veit-Haibach P, Buck A, Stolzmann P, Burger IA, Kollias SS, Huellner MW. Value of 18F-FET PET in adult brainstem glioma. Clin Imaging 2018; 51:68-75. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.01.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2017] [Revised: 01/25/2018] [Accepted: 01/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
9
|
Näslund O, Smits A, Förander P, Laesser M, Bartek J, Gempt J, Liljegren A, Daxberg EL, Jakola AS. Amino acid tracers in PET imaging of diffuse low-grade gliomas: a systematic review of preoperative applications. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2018; 160:1451-1460. [PMID: 29797098 PMCID: PMC5995993 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-018-3563-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2018] [Accepted: 05/09/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging using amino acid tracers has in recent years become widely used in the diagnosis and prediction of disease course in diffuse low-grade gliomas (LGG). However, implications of preoperative PET for treatment and prognosis in this patient group have not been systematically studied. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the preoperative diagnostic and prognostic value of amino acid PET in suspected diffuse LGG. Medline, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were systematically searched using keywords "PET," "low-grade glioma," and "amino acids tracers" with their respective synonyms. Out of 2137 eligible studies, 28 met the inclusion criteria. Increased amino acid uptake (lesion/brain) was consistently reported among included studies; in 25-92% of subsequently histopathology-verified LGG, in 83-100% of histopathology-verified HGG, and also in some non-neoplastic lesions. No consistent results were found in studies reporting hot spot areas on PET in MRI-suspected LGG. Thus, the diagnostic value of amino acid PET imaging in suspected LGG has proven difficult to interpret, showing clear overlap and inconsistencies among reported results. Similarly, the results regarding the prognostic value of PET in suspected LGG and the correlation between uptake ratios and the molecular tumor status of LGG were conflicting. This systematic review illustrates the difficulties with prognostic studies presenting data on group-level without adjustment for established clinical prognostic factors, leading to a loss of additional prognostic information. We conclude that the prognostic value of PET is limited to analysis of histological subgroups of LGG and is probably strongest when using kinetic analysis of dynamic FET uptake parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia Näslund
- Sahlgrenska Academy, Medicinaregatan 3, 41390, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| | - Anja Smits
- Institute of Physiology and Neuroscience, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Neuroscience, Neurology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Petter Förander
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience and Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Neurosurgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mats Laesser
- Department of Neurosurgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Radiology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Jiri Bartek
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience and Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Neurosurgery, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Neurosurgery, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jens Gempt
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ann Liljegren
- Department of Radiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Eva-Lotte Daxberg
- Department of Radiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Asgeir Store Jakola
- Institute of Physiology and Neuroscience, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Medical Library, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Siddiq IS, Atwa ST, Shama SA, Eltaoudy MH, Omar WM. Radiosynthesis and modified quality control of O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine ([18F]FET) for brain tumor imaging. Appl Radiat Isot 2018; 133:38-44. [PMID: 29275040 DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2017.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2017] [Revised: 11/29/2017] [Accepted: 12/10/2017] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
11
|
Chiang GC, Kovanlikaya I, Choi C, Ramakrishna R, Magge R, Shungu DC. Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Positron Emission Tomography and Radiogenomics-Relevance to Glioma. Front Neurol 2018; 9:33. [PMID: 29459844 PMCID: PMC5807339 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2017] [Accepted: 01/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Advances in metabolic imaging techniques have allowed for more precise characterization of gliomas, particularly as it relates to tumor recurrence or pseudoprogression. Furthermore, the emerging field of radiogenomics where radiographic features are systemically correlated with molecular markers has the potential to achieve the holy grail of neuro-oncologic neuro-radiology, namely molecular diagnosis without requiring tissue specimens. In this section, we will review the utility of metabolic imaging and discuss the current state of the art related to the radiogenomics of glioblastoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gloria C Chiang
- Department of Neuroradiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States
| | - Ilhami Kovanlikaya
- Department of Neuroradiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States
| | - Changho Choi
- Radiology, Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Rohan Ramakrishna
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States
| | - Rajiv Magge
- Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States
| | - Dikoma C Shungu
- Department of Neuroradiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Pyka T, Gempt J, Bette S, Ringel F, Förster S. Positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance spectroscopy in cerebral gliomas. Clin Transl Imaging 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/s40336-017-0222-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
13
|
Marner L, Henriksen OM, Lundemann M, Larsen VA, Law I. Clinical PET/MRI in neurooncology: opportunities and challenges from a single-institution perspective. Clin Transl Imaging 2016; 5:135-149. [PMID: 28936429 PMCID: PMC5581366 DOI: 10.1007/s40336-016-0213-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2016] [Accepted: 10/31/2016] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Purpose Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a key role in neurooncology, i.e., for diagnosis, treatment evaluation and detection of recurrence. However, standard MRI cannot always separate malignant tissue from other pathologies or treatment-induced changes. Advanced MRI techniques such as diffusion-weighted imaging, perfusion imaging and spectroscopy show promising results in discriminating malignant from benign lesions. Further, supplemental imaging with amino acid positron emission tomography (PET) has been shown to increase accuracy significantly and is used routinely at an increasing number of sites. Several centers are now implementing hybrid PET/MRI systems allowing for multiparametric imaging, combining conventional MRI with advanced MRI and amino acid PET imaging. Neurooncology is an obvious focus area for PET/MR imaging. Methods Based on the literature and our experience from more than 300 PET/MRI examinations of brain tumors with 18F-fluoro-ethyl-tyrosine, the clinical use of PET/MRI in adult and pediatric neurooncology is critically reviewed. Results Although the results are increasingly promising, the added value and range of indications for multiparametric imaging with PET/MRI are yet to be established. Robust solutions to overcome the number of issues when using a PET/MRI scanner are being developed, which is promising for a more routine use in the future. Conclusions In a clinical setting, a PET/MRI scan may increase accuracy in discriminating recurrence from treatment changes, although sequential same-day imaging on separate systems will often constitute a reliable and cost-effective alternative. Pediatric patients who require general anesthesia will benefit the most from simultaneous PET and MR imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisbeth Marner
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, 9 Blegdamsvej, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Otto M Henriksen
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, 9 Blegdamsvej, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Michael Lundemann
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, 9 Blegdamsvej, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Vibeke Andrée Larsen
- Department of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, 9 Blegdamsvej, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ian Law
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, 9 Blegdamsvej, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
A previous review published in 2012 demonstrated the role of clinical PET for diagnosis and management of brain tumors using mainly FDG, amino acid tracers, and 18F-fluorothymidine. This review provides an update on clinical PET studies, most of which are motivated by prediction of prognosis and planning and monitoring of therapy in gliomas. For FDG, there has been additional evidence supporting late scanning, and combination with 13N ammonia has yielded some promising results. Large neutral amino acid tracers have found widespread applications mostly based on 18F-labeled compounds fluoroethyltyrosine and fluorodopa for targeting biopsies, therapy planning and monitoring, and as outcome markers in clinical trials. 11C-alpha-methyltryptophan (AMT) has been proposed as an alternative to 11C-methionine, and there may also be a role for cyclic amino acid tracers. 18F-fluorothymidine has shown strengths for tumor grading and as an outcome marker. Studies using 18F-fluorocholine (FCH) and 68Ga-labeled compounds are promising but have not yet clearly defined their role. Studies on radiotherapy planning have explored the use of large neutral amino acid tracers to improve the delineation of tumor volume for irradiation and the use of hypoxia markers, in particular 18F-fluoromisonidazole. Many studies employed the combination of PET with advanced multimodal MR imaging methods, mostly demonstrating complementarity and some potential benefits of hybrid PET/MR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karl Herholz
- The University of Manchester, Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre, Manchester, England, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Albert NL, Weller M, Suchorska B, Galldiks N, Soffietti R, Kim MM, la Fougère C, Pope W, Law I, Arbizu J, Chamberlain MC, Vogelbaum M, Ellingson BM, Tonn JC. Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology working group and European Association for Neuro-Oncology recommendations for the clinical use of PET imaging in gliomas. Neuro Oncol 2016; 18:1199-208. [PMID: 27106405 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/now058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 465] [Impact Index Per Article: 58.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2016] [Accepted: 03/14/2016] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
This guideline provides recommendations for the use of PET imaging in gliomas. The review examines established clinical benefit in glioma patients of PET using glucose ((18)F-FDG) and amino acid tracers ((11)C-MET, (18)F-FET, and (18)F-FDOPA). An increasing number of studies have been published on PET imaging in the setting of diagnosis, biopsy, and resection as well radiotherapy planning, treatment monitoring, and response assessment. Recommendations are based on evidence generated from studies which validated PET findings by histology or clinical course. This guideline emphasizes the clinical value of PET imaging with superiority of amino acid PET over glucose PET and provides a framework for the use of PET to assist in the management of patients with gliomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (N.L.A.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (B.S., J.C.T.); Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy (R.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (M.M.K.); Division of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (C.l.F.); Radiological Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (W.P.); Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (I.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain (J.A.); Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.A.V.); Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E.)
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (N.L.A.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (B.S., J.C.T.); Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy (R.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (M.M.K.); Division of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (C.l.F.); Radiological Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (W.P.); Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (I.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain (J.A.); Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.A.V.); Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E.)
| | - Bogdana Suchorska
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (N.L.A.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (B.S., J.C.T.); Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy (R.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (M.M.K.); Division of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (C.l.F.); Radiological Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (W.P.); Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (I.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain (J.A.); Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.A.V.); Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E.)
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (N.L.A.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (B.S., J.C.T.); Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy (R.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (M.M.K.); Division of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (C.l.F.); Radiological Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (W.P.); Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (I.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain (J.A.); Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.A.V.); Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E.)
| | - Riccardo Soffietti
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (N.L.A.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (B.S., J.C.T.); Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy (R.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (M.M.K.); Division of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (C.l.F.); Radiological Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (W.P.); Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (I.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain (J.A.); Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.A.V.); Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E.)
| | - Michelle M Kim
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (N.L.A.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (B.S., J.C.T.); Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy (R.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (M.M.K.); Division of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (C.l.F.); Radiological Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (W.P.); Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (I.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain (J.A.); Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.A.V.); Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E.)
| | - Christian la Fougère
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (N.L.A.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (B.S., J.C.T.); Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy (R.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (M.M.K.); Division of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (C.l.F.); Radiological Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (W.P.); Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (I.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain (J.A.); Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.A.V.); Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E.)
| | - Whitney Pope
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (N.L.A.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (B.S., J.C.T.); Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy (R.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (M.M.K.); Division of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (C.l.F.); Radiological Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (W.P.); Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (I.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain (J.A.); Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.A.V.); Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E.)
| | - Ian Law
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (N.L.A.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (B.S., J.C.T.); Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy (R.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (M.M.K.); Division of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (C.l.F.); Radiological Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (W.P.); Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (I.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain (J.A.); Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.A.V.); Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E.)
| | - Javier Arbizu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (N.L.A.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (B.S., J.C.T.); Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy (R.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (M.M.K.); Division of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (C.l.F.); Radiological Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (W.P.); Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (I.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain (J.A.); Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.A.V.); Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E.)
| | - Marc C Chamberlain
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (N.L.A.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (B.S., J.C.T.); Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy (R.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (M.M.K.); Division of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (C.l.F.); Radiological Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (W.P.); Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (I.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain (J.A.); Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.A.V.); Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E.)
| | - Michael Vogelbaum
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (N.L.A.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (B.S., J.C.T.); Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy (R.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (M.M.K.); Division of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (C.l.F.); Radiological Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (W.P.); Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (I.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain (J.A.); Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.A.V.); Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E.)
| | - Ben M Ellingson
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (N.L.A.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (B.S., J.C.T.); Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy (R.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (M.M.K.); Division of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (C.l.F.); Radiological Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (W.P.); Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (I.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain (J.A.); Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.A.V.); Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E.)
| | - Joerg C Tonn
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (N.L.A.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (B.S., J.C.T.); Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy (R.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (M.M.K.); Division of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (C.l.F.); Radiological Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (W.P.); Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (I.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain (J.A.); Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.A.V.); Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E.)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Yu J, Wang M, Song J, Huang D, Hong X. Potential Utility of Visually AcceSAble Rembrandt Images Assessment in Brain Astrocytoma Grading. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2016; 40:301-6. [PMID: 26978002 DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of multivariate factors of Visually AcceSAble Rembrandt Images (VASARI) in brain astrocytoma grading. METHODS Presurgical magnetic resonance images of 126 patients with brain astrocytomas (World Health Organization grade 2, n = 38; grade 3, n = 36; grade 4, n = 52) were rated by 2 neuroradiologists for tumor size, location, and tumor morphology by using a standardized imaging feature set VASARI. RESULTS Significant differences were noted in 12 factors of VASARI including enhancement quality, enhancing proportion, noncontrast enhancing tumor proportion, necrosis proportion, edema proportion, hemorrhage, thickness of enhancing margin, definition of the enhancing margin, pial and ependymal invasion, enhanced tumor crossing midline, and satellites between brain astrocytoma grades (grades 1-IV, P < 0.05). On multivariate regression analysis, enhancement quality was an independent diagnostic factor for high-grade brain astrocytoma, whereas edema proportion was an independent diagnostic factor in differentiating grade 2 and grade 3. Noncontrast enhancing tumor proportion was a predictive factor in the diagnosis of grade 4 astrocytoma. Receiver operating characteristic analysis illustrates edema proportion score higher than 2 with sensitivity of 86.1% in differentiating grade 2 and grade 3 astrocytoma. Noncontrast enhancing tumor proportion scores 4 or lower has high sensitivity (92.3%) but moderate specificity (50.0%) in differentiating grade 3 and grade 4 astrocytoma. CONCLUSIONS Our data illustrate that magnetic resonance features of VASARI especially enhancement quality, edema proportion, and noncontrast enhancing tumor proportion provided precise and detailed information of astrocytoma grading and suggested that prediction of astrocytoma grading is based on VASARI as an adjunct to biopsy.
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
High-grade gliomas [HGG (WHO grades III-IV)] are almost invariably fatal. Imaging of HGG is important for orientating diagnosis, prognosis and treatment planning and is crucial for development of novel, more effective therapies. Given the potentially unlimited number of usable tracing molecules and the elevated number of available radionuclides, PET allows gathering multiple informations on HGG including data on tissue metabolism and drug pharmacokinetics. PET studies on the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of HGG carried out by most frequently used tracers and radionuclides ((11)C and (18)F) and published in 2014 have been reviewed. These studies demonstrate that a thorough choice of tracers may confer elevated diagnostic and prognostic power to PET imaging of HGG. They also suggest that a combination of PET and MRI may give the most complete and reliable imaging information on HGG and that research on hybrid PET/MRI may be paying back in terms of improved diagnosis, prognosis and treatment planning of these deadly tumours.
Collapse
|
18
|
Yang ZL, Zhang LJ. PET/MRI of central nervous system: current status and future perspective. Eur Radiol 2016; 26:3534-41. [PMID: 26780640 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-4202-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2015] [Revised: 12/15/2015] [Accepted: 12/30/2015] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Imaging plays an increasingly important role in the early diagnosis, prognosis prediction and therapy response evaluation of central nervous system (CNS) diseases. The newly emerging hybrid positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) can perform "one-stop-shop" evaluation, including anatomic, functional, biochemical and metabolic information, even at the molecular level, for personalised diagnoses and treatments of CNS diseases. However, there are still several problems to be resolved, such as appropriate PET detectors, attenuation correction and so on. This review will introduce the basic physical principles of PET/MRI and its potential clinical applications in the CNS. We also provide the future perspectives for this field. KEY POINTS • PET/MRI can simultaneously provide anatomic, functional, biochemical and metabolic information. • PET/MRI has promising potential in various central nervous system diseases. • Research on the future implementation of PET/MRI is challenging and encouraging.
Collapse
|
19
|
Malkowski B, Harat M, Zyromska A, Wisniewski T, Harat A, Lopatto R, Furtak J. The Sum of Tumour-to-Brain Ratios Improves the Accuracy of Diagnosing Gliomas Using 18F-FET PET. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0140917. [PMID: 26468649 PMCID: PMC4607373 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2015] [Accepted: 10/01/2015] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Gliomas are common brain tumours, but obtaining tissue for definitive diagnosis can be difficult. There is, therefore, interest in the use of non-invasive methods to diagnose and grade the disease. Although positron emission tomography (PET) with 18F-fluorethyltyrosine (18F-FET) can be used to differentiate between low-grade (LGG) and high-grade (HGG) gliomas, the optimal parameters to measure and their cut-points have yet to be established. We therefore assessed the value of single and dual time-point acquisition of 18F-FET PET parameters to differentiate between primary LGGs (n = 22) and HGGs (n = 24). PET examination was considered positive for glioma if the metabolic activity was 1.6-times higher than that of background (contralateral) brain, and maximum tissue-brain ratios (TBRmax) were calculated 10 and 60 min after isotope administration with their sums and differences calculated from individual time-point values. Using a threshold-based method, the overall sensitivity of PET was 97%. Several analysed parameters were significantly different between LGGs and HGGs. However, in a receiver operating characteristics analysis, TBR sum had the best diagnostic accuracy of 87% and sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 100%, 72.7%, 80%, and 100%, respectively. 18F-FET PET is valuable for the non-invasive determination of glioma grade, especially when dual time-point metrics are used. TBR sum shows the greatest accuracy, sensitivity, and negative predictive value for tumour grade differentiation and is a simple method to implement. However, the cut-off may differ between institutions and calibration strategies would be useful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bogdan Malkowski
- Department of Positron Emission Tomography and Molecular Imaging, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum, Bydgoszcz, Poland
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Franciszek Lukaszczyk Oncology Centre, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Maciej Harat
- Department of Radiotherapy, Franciszek Lukaszczyk Oncology Centre, Bydgoszcz, Poland
- Department of Oncology and Brachytherapy, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum, Bydgoszcz, Poland
- * E-mail:
| | - Agnieszka Zyromska
- Department of Radiotherapy, Franciszek Lukaszczyk Oncology Centre, Bydgoszcz, Poland
- Department of Oncology and Brachytherapy, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Tomasz Wisniewski
- Department of Radiotherapy, Franciszek Lukaszczyk Oncology Centre, Bydgoszcz, Poland
- Department of Oncology and Brachytherapy, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Aleksandra Harat
- Department of Public Health, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Rita Lopatto
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Franciszek Lukaszczyk Oncology Centre, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Jacek Furtak
- Department of Neurosurgery, 10th Military Research Hospital and Polyclinic, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Wang Q, Zhang H, Zhang J, Wu C, Zhu W, Li F, Chen X, Xu B. The diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance spectroscopy in differentiating high-from low-grade gliomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2016; 26:2670-84. [PMID: 26471274 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-4046-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2015] [Revised: 09/19/2015] [Accepted: 09/23/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) is a powerful tool for preoperative grading of gliomas. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic performance of MRS in differentiating high-grade gliomas (HGGs) from low-grade gliomas (LGGs). METHODS PubMed and Embase databases were systematically searched for relevant studies of glioma grading assessed by MRS through 27 March 2015. Based on the data from eligible studies, pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio and areas under summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC) of different metabolite ratios were obtained. RESULTS Thirty articles comprising a total sample size of 1228 patients were included in our meta-analysis. Quantitative synthesis of studies showed that the pooled sensitivity/specificity of Cho/Cr, Cho/NAA and NAA/Cr ratios was 0.75/0.60, 0.80/0.76 and 0.71/0.70, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) of the SROC was 0.83, 0.87 and 0.78, respectively. CONCLUSIONS MRS demonstrated moderate diagnostic performance in distinguishing HGGs from LGGs using tumoural metabolite ratios including Cho/Cr, Cho/NAA and NAA/Cr. Although there was no significant difference in AUC between Cho/Cr and Cho/NAA groups, Cho/NAA ratio showed higher sensitivity and specificity than Cho/Cr ratio and NAA/Cr ratio. We suggest that MRS should combine other advanced imaging techniques to improve diagnostic accuracy in differentiating HGGs from LGGs. KEY POINTS • MRS has moderate diagnostic performance in distinguishing HGGs from LGGs. • There is no significant difference in AUC between Cho/Cr and Cho/NAA ratios. • Cho/NAA ratio is superior to NAA/Cr ratio. • Cho/NAA ratio shows higher sensitivity and specificity than Cho/Cr and NAA/Cr ratios. • MRS should combine other advanced imaging techniques to improve diagnostic accuracy.
Collapse
|
21
|
Dunet V, Pomoni A, Hottinger A, Nicod-Lalonde M, Prior JO. Performance of 18F-FET versus 18F-FDG-PET for the diagnosis and grading of brain tumors: systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuro Oncol 2015; 18:426-34. [PMID: 26243791 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nov148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 104] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2015] [Accepted: 07/04/2015] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For the past decade (18)F-fluoro-ethyl-l-tyrosine (FET) and (18)F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) have been used for the assessment of patients with brain tumor. However, direct comparison studies reported only limited numbers of patients. Our purpose was to compare the diagnostic performance of FET and FDG-PET. METHODS We examined studies published between January 1995 and January 2015 in the PubMed database. To be included the study should: (i) use FET and FDG-PET for the assessment of patients with isolated brain lesion and (ii) use histology as the gold standard. Analysis was performed on a per patient basis. Study quality was assessed with STARD and QUADAS criteria. RESULTS Five studies (119 patients) were included. For the diagnosis of brain tumor, FET-PET demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.79-0.98) and pooled specificity of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.37-0.99), with an area under the curve of 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94-0.97), a positive likelihood ratio (LR+) of 8.1 (95% CI: 0.8-80.6), and a negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of 0.07 (95% CI: 0.02-0.30), while FDG-PET demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.38 (95% CI: 0.27-0.50) and specificity of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.31-0.99), with an area under the curve of 0.40 (95% CI: 0.36-0.44), an LR+ of 2.7 (95% CI: 0.3-27.8), and an LR- of 0.72 (95% CI: 0.47-1.11). Target-to-background ratios of either FDG or FET, however, allow distinction between low- and high-grade gliomas (P > .11). CONCLUSIONS For brain tumor diagnosis, FET-PET performed much better than FDG and should be preferred when assessing a new isolated brain tumor. For glioma grading, however, both tracers showed similar performances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Dunet
- Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland (V.D.); Nuclear Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland (A.P., M.N.-L., J.O.P.); Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland (A.H.); Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland (A.H.)
| | - Anastasia Pomoni
- Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland (V.D.); Nuclear Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland (A.P., M.N.-L., J.O.P.); Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland (A.H.); Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland (A.H.)
| | - Andreas Hottinger
- Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland (V.D.); Nuclear Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland (A.P., M.N.-L., J.O.P.); Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland (A.H.); Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland (A.H.)
| | - Marie Nicod-Lalonde
- Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland (V.D.); Nuclear Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland (A.P., M.N.-L., J.O.P.); Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland (A.H.); Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland (A.H.)
| | - John O Prior
- Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland (V.D.); Nuclear Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland (A.P., M.N.-L., J.O.P.); Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland (A.H.); Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland (A.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bashir U, Mallia A, Stirling J, Joemon J, MacKewn J, Charles-Edwards G, Goh V, Cook GJ. PET/MRI in Oncological Imaging: State of the Art. Diagnostics (Basel) 2015; 5:333-57. [PMID: 26854157 PMCID: PMC4665605 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics5030333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2015] [Revised: 07/09/2015] [Accepted: 07/10/2015] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Positron emission tomography (PET) combined with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a hybrid technology which has recently gained interest as a potential cancer imaging tool. Compared with CT, MRI is advantageous due to its lack of ionizing radiation, superior soft-tissue contrast resolution, and wider range of acquisition sequences. Several studies have shown PET/MRI to be equivalent to PET/CT in most oncological applications, possibly superior in certain body parts, e.g., head and neck, pelvis, and in certain situations, e.g., cancer recurrence. This review will update the readers on recent advances in PET/MRI technology and review key literature, while highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of PET/MRI in cancer imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Usman Bashir
- Cancer Imaging Department, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
| | - Andrew Mallia
- Cancer Imaging Department, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
| | - James Stirling
- Cancer Imaging Department, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
- PET Imaging Centre and the Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
| | - John Joemon
- PET Imaging Centre and the Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
| | - Jane MacKewn
- PET Imaging Centre and the Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
| | - Geoff Charles-Edwards
- Cancer Imaging Department, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
- Medical Physics, Guy's & St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
| | - Vicky Goh
- Cancer Imaging Department, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
- Department of Radiology, Guy's & St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
| | - Gary J Cook
- Cancer Imaging Department, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
- PET Imaging Centre and the Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
Tremendous advances have been made in abdominopelvic MR imaging, which continue to improve image quality, and make acquisitions faster and robust. We briefly discuss the role of non-Cartesian acquisition schemes as well as dual parallel radiofrequency (RF) transmit systems in the article to further improve image quality of the abdominal MR imaging. Furthermore, the use of hybrid PET/MR systems has the potential to synergistically combine MR imaging with PET acquisition, and the evolving role of hybrid PET/MR imaging is discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Kierans
- Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, 660 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Nainesh Parikh
- Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, 660 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Hersh Chandarana
- Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, 660 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Werner P, Barthel H, Drzezga A, Sabri O. Current status and future role of brain PET/MRI in clinical and research settings. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2015; 42:512-26. [PMID: 25573629 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-014-2970-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2014] [Accepted: 12/03/2014] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Hybrid PET/MRI systematically offers a complementary combination of two modalities that has often proven itself superior to the single modality approach in the diagnostic work-up of many neurological and psychiatric diseases. Emerging PET tracers, technical advances in multiparametric MRI and obvious workflow advantages may lead to a significant improvement in the diagnosis of dementia disorders, neurooncological diseases, epilepsy and neurovascular diseases using PET/MRI. Moreover, simultaneous PET/MRI is well suited to complex studies of brain function in which fast fluctuations of brain signals (e.g. related to task processing or in response to pharmacological interventions) need to be monitored on multiple levels. Initial simultaneous studies have already demonstrated that these complementary measures of brain function can provide new insights into the functional and structural organization of the brain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Werner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstr. 18, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Hu Z, Yang W, Liu H, Wang K, Bao C, Song T, Wang J, Tian J. From PET/CT to PET/MRI: advances in instrumentation and clinical applications. Mol Pharm 2014; 11:3798-809. [PMID: 25058336 DOI: 10.1021/mp500321h] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Multimodality imaging of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) provides both metabolic information and the anatomic structure, which is significantly superior to either PET or CT alone and has greatly improved its clinical applications. Because of the higher soft-tissue contrast of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and no extra ionizing radiation, PET/MRI imaging is the hottest topic currently. PET/MRI is swiftly making its way into clinical practice. However, it has many technical difficulties to overcome, such as photomultiplier tubes, which cannot work properly in a magnetic field, and the inability to provide density information on the object for attenuation correction. This paper introduces the technique process of PET/MRI and summarizes its clinical applications, including imaging in oncology, neurology, and cardiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenhua Hu
- Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences , Beijing 100190, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|