Evaluation of microsatellite instability in women with epithelial ovarian cancer

Treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer is the third most common gynecologic malignancy worldwide but accounts for the highest mortality rate among these cancers. A stepwise approach to assessment, diagnosis, and treatment is vital to appropriate management of this disease process. An integrated approach with gynecologic oncologists as well as medical oncologists, pathologists, and radiologists is of paramount importance to improving outcomes. Surgical cytoreduction to R0 is the mainstay of treatment, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. Genetic testing for gene mutations that affect treatment is the standard of care for all women with epithelial ovarian cancer. Nearly all women will have a recurrence, and the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer continues to be nuanced and requires extensive review of up to date modalities that balance efficacy with the patient's quality of life. Maintenance therapy with poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors, bevacizumab, and/or drugs targeting homologous recombination deficiency is becoming more widely used in the treatment of ovarian cancer, and the advancement of immunotherapy is further revolutionizing treatment targets.

EMAST frequency in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis and literature review

Aim: The prognostic and predictive value of Elevated Microsatellite Alterations at Selected Tetranucleotide (EMAST) has been reported in colorectal cancer (CRC). The prevalence of EMAST in CRC varied across the literature. We conducted a meta-analysis to determine the prevalence of EMAST in CRC. Materials & methods: Three international databases including PubMed, ISI and Scopus were searched to identify related articles that described the frequency of EMAST. Results: Analysis was performed on 16 eligible studies including 4922 patients. The overall EMAST prevalence among CRCs patients was 33% (95% CI: 23-43%, I² = 98%). Conclusion: This study indicated that approximately a third of the CRC patients are diagnosed with EMAST, hereupon EMAST as a prognostic and predictive biomarker should be more studied clinically.

Correlations between microsatellite instability and the biological behaviour of tumours

Purpose

Microsatellites are widely distributed repetitive DNA motifs, accounting for approximately 3% of the genome. Due to mismatch repair system deficiency, insertion or deletion of repetitive units often occurs, leading to microsatellite instability. In this review, we aimed to explore the relationship between MSI and biological behaviour of colorectal carcinoma, gastric carcinoma, lymphoma/leukaemia and endometrial carcinoma, as well as the application of frameshift peptide vaccines in cancer therapy.

Methods

The relevant literature from PubMed and Baidu Xueshu were reviewed in this article. The ClinicalTrials.gov database was searched for clinical trials related to the specific topic.

Results

Microsatellite instability is divided into three subtypes: high-level, low-level microsatellite instability, and stable microsatellites. The majority of tumour patients with high-level microsatellite instability often show a better efficacy and prognosis than those with low-level microsatellite instability or stable microsatellites. In coding regions, especially for genes involved in tumourigenesis, microsatellite instability often results in inactivation of proteins and contributes to tumourigenesis. Moreover, the occurrence of microsatellite instability in coding regions can also cause the generation of frameshift peptides that are thought to be unknown and novel to the individual immune system. Thus, these frameshift peptides have the potential to be biomarkers to raise tumour-specific immune responses.

Conclusion

MSI has the potential to become a key predictor for evaluating the degree of malignancy, efficacy and prognosis of tumours. Clinically, MSI patterns will provide more valuable information for clinicians to create optimal individualized treatment strategies based on frameshift peptides vaccines.

Mismatch Repair Protein Loss as a Prognostic and Predictive Biomarker in Breast Cancers Regardless of Microsatellite Instability

Background

Breast cancers that harbor mismatch-repair (MMR) deficiency and/or microsatellite instability (MSI) might be sensitive to immune checkpoint blockade, but there are currently no specific guidelines for assessing MMR status in breast cancer. Here, we sought to define the clinical value of MMR immunohistochemistry (IHC) and MSI analysis in breast cancers.

Methods

We subjected 444 breast cancers to MMR IHC and MSI analysis. Cases were classified as MMR-proficient (pMMR), MMR-deficient (dMMR), and MMR-heterogeneous (hMMR) based on the loss of immunoreactivity; MSI was defined by instability in the five indicators recommended by the National Cancer Institute for endometrial and colorectal cancers. Correlation of MMR status with patients' survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Statistical tests were two-sided.

Results

Loss of MMR proteins was homogeneous (dMMR) in 75 patients (17%) and heterogeneous (hMMR) in 55 (12%). Among luminal breast cancers, there were similar frequencies of dMMR and hMMR tumors. Overall, the rate of discrepancy between IHC and MSI analysis was high (91%). Women with Luminal B-like dMMR carcinomas (n = 44) showed shorter overall survival (median = 77 months, range = 0-115 months) than those with pMMR (n = 205) or hMMR (n = 35) tumors (median = 84 months, range = 0-127 months) (P = .008). On the contrary, patients with estrogen receptor-negative breast cancers treated with chemotherapy lived longer in cases of dMMR (n = 9) than pMMR (n = 33) or hMMR (n = 7) tumors, with 87 months of median survival (range = 73-123 months) for the former compared with 79 months (range = 8-113 months) for the latter two categories (P < .001).

Conclusions

Immunohistochemistry and MSI are not interchangeable tests in breast carcinomas. MMR protein loss is a more common event than MSI and shows intra-tumor heterogeneity. MMR IHC allows the identification of clinically relevant subclasses of breast cancer patients, provided that multiple areas of the tumor are analyzed.

MSI-L/EMAST is a predictive biomarker for metastasis in colorectal cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a prognostic marker in colorectal cancer (CRC). The biological significance of MSI-low (MSI-L) phenotype and its differences with microsatellite stable (MSS) phenotype remains unclear. The aim of this study is indicating the role of mononucleotide repeat in identifying MSI-L and revealing the association of MSI-L with elevated microsatellite alterations at selected tetranucleotide repeats (EMAST) and oncologic outcome in CRC patients.

METHODS

MSI and EMAST status were analyzed using three quasimonomorphic panel (BAT-25, BAT-26, and NR-27) and five tetranucleotide repeats (D20S82, D20S85, D9S242, D8S321, and MYCL1), respectively, by capillary electrophoresis method without the need to fluorescent primers. The associations of MSI status with clinicopathological features, EMAST status, metastasis, and overall survival (OS) were investigated.

RESULTS

Among 159 CRC patient 22.0% were MSI-H, 40.3% were MSS, 37.7% were MSI-L, and 41.5% showed EMAST + phenotype. MSI-L were associated with advanced stages, EMAST⁺ tumors and worse OS ( p ≤ 0.001). Metastasis was relatively common in MSI-L/EMAST ⁺ CRCs and BAT-25 were the most unstable marker in these tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

MSI-L tumors have different clinicopathological features from MSS and MSI-H tumors. The MSI-L phenotype is a worse prognostic biomarker in CRC and when accompanied by EMAST could be a predictor for metastasis.

Prevalence and molecular characteristics of defective mismatch repair epithelial ovarian cancer in a Japanese hospital-based population

Background

The prevalence and molecular characteristics of defective mismatch repair epithelial ovarian cancers in the Japanese population have scarcely been investigated.

Methods

Immunohistochemistry for mismatch repair proteins (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2) was performed in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections prepared from resected primary epithelial ovarian cancers in patients who underwent oophorectomy at our institution between April 2005 and September 2014. Genetic and/or epigenetic alterations of the mismatch repair genes were investigated in patients with loss of any mismatch repair proteins in the tumor.

Results

There were 305 patients with a median age of 54 years (range, 18-83 years). Loss of expression in the ovarian tumor of one or more mismatch repair proteins was observed in 3 of the 305 patients (0.98%): 2 patients MLH1/PMS2 loss and 1 patient showed MSH2/MSH6 loss. Genetic testing of these three patients failed to reveal any pathogenic germline mutations of MLH1 or MSH2. One patient with MLH1/PMS2 loss showed hypermethylation of the promoter region of MLH1. Somatic mutations were found in each of the alleles of MLH1 (c.545dupG and deletion of exons 2-19) in the other patient with MLH1/PMS2 loss. In the patient with MSH2/MSH6 loss, two somatic mutations were detected in MSH2 (c.229_230delAG and c.1861C>T), although we could not determine whether these mutations were biallelic or not.

Conclusions

The prevalence of defective mismatch repair epithelial ovarian cancer in the Japanese hospital-based population was extremely low. Molecular mechanism involved in such defective mismatch repair ovarian cancers seems to be epigenetic events through MLH1 promotor hypermethylation or somatically mutated mismatch repair genes without germline mismatch repair mutation.

Prognostic significance of microsatellite instability‑associated pathways and genes in gastric cancer

The aim of the present study was to reveal the potential molecular mechanisms of microsatellite instability (MSI) on the prognosis of gastric cancer (GC). The investigation was performed based on an RNAseq expression profiling dataset downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas, including 64 high‑level MSI (MSI‑H) GC samples, 44 low‑level MSI (MSI‑L) GC samples and 187 stable microsatellite (MSI‑S) GC samples. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified between the MSI‑H, MSI‑L and MSI‑S samples. Pathway enrichment analysis was performed for the identified DEGs and the pathway deviation scores of the significant enrichment pathways were calculated. A Multi‑Layer Perceptron (MLP) classifier, based on the different pathways associated with the MSI statuses was constructed for predicting the outcome of patients with GC, which was validated in another independent dataset. A total of 190 DEGs were selected between the MSI‑H, MSI‑L and MSI‑S samples. The MLP classifier was established based on the deviation scores of 10 significant pathways, among which antigen processing and presentation, and inflammatory bowel disease pathways were significantly enriched with HLA‑DRB5, HLA‑DMA, HLA‑DQA1 and HLA‑DRA; the measles, toxoplasmosis and herpes simplex infection pathways were significantly enriched with Janus kinase 2 (JAK2), caspase‑8 (CASP8) and Fas. The classifier performed well on an independent validation set with 100 GC samples. Taken together, the results indicated that MSI status may affect GC prognosis, partly through the antigen processing and presentation, inflammatory bowel disease, measles, toxoplasmosis and herpes simplex infection pathways. HLA‑DRB5, HLA‑DMA, HLA‑DQA1, HLA‑DRA, JAK2, CASP8 and Fas may be predictive factors for prognosis in GC.

Screening for Lynch syndrome using risk assessment criteria in patients with ovarian cancer

Objective

Lynch syndrome is a cancer predisposition syndrome caused by germline mutation of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. Lynch syndrome only causes about 0.4% of cases of ovarian cancer, which suggests that universal screening may not be cost-efficient. However, the frequency of Lynch syndrome in ovarian cancer is unclear in the Asian population. The goal of the study was to investigate a screening strategy using family history.

Methods

The subjects were 129 patients with ovarian cancer. Clinical and family history were collected using a self-administered questionnaire, and Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) criteria 2007 and PREMM₅ were used for risk assessment. Microsatellite instability, immunohistochemistry, and methylation of MMR genes were analyzed.

Results

Of the 129 cases, 25 (19.4%) met the SGO criteria, and 4 of these 25 had MSI-high and MMR deficiency. Two cases had loss of MSH2 and MSH6, indicating MSH2 mutation, and the other two had loss of MLH1 and PMS2, including one without MLH1 methylation indicating MLH1 mutation. These results show that screening using family history can detect Lynch syndrome in 12.0% (3/25) of ovarian cancer cases. The 3 cases were positive for PREMM₅, but negative for Amsterdam II criteria and revised Bethesda guidelines. Genetic testing in one case with MSH2 and MSH6 deficiency confirmed the diagnosis of Lynch syndrome with MSH2 mutation.

Conclusion

This is the first study of screening for Lynch syndrome in ovarian cancer using clinical and family history in an Asian population. This approach may be effective for diagnosis in these patients.

Lynch Syndrome Screening in the Gynecologic Tract: Current State of the Art

Lynch syndrome underlies approximately 5% of endometrial cancers and ∼1% of ovarian cancers. Gynecologic malignancies are often the presenting cancer in these patients. Therefore, there is considerable benefit to identifying these patients and enrolling them and affected family members in surveillance programs for secondary malignancies. The molecular basis for Lynch syndrome is a defect in the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system. Tumors can be screened for these defects using immunohistochemistry to identify loss of MMR proteins or by enlisting polymerase chain reaction to identify the microsatellite instability that attends dysfunctional MMR. However, diagnostic confirmation of Lynch syndrome requires germline mutational testing. The algorithm for screening endometrial carcinomas for Lynch syndrome remains a subject of debate, with some studies supporting universal screening and others proposing a hybrid approach informed by clinicopathologic features. This review discusses the rationales and relative merits of current Lynch syndrome-screening approaches for endometrial and ovarian cancers and provides pathologists with an informed approach to Lynch syndrome testing in gynecologic cancers. It also addresses the clinical difficulties presented by cases with discordant screening and germline results (Lynch-like cancers) and emphasizes the critical role of strong communication with clinician and genetic counseling colleagues to ensure that the significance of a positive screening test is appropriately conveyed to patients. Finally, it discusses the need for more nuanced cost-effective analyses and the potential role for next-generation sequencing panels in future screening efforts.

Mismatch Repair Deficiency and Response to Immune Checkpoint Blockade

: More than 1.6 million new cases of cancer will be diagnosed in the U.S. in 2016, resulting in more than 500,000 deaths. Although chemotherapy has been the mainstay of treatment in advanced cancers, immunotherapy development, particularly with PD-1 inhibitors, has changed the face of treatment for a number of tumor types. One example is the subset of tumors characterized by mismatch repair deficiency and microsatellite instability that are highly sensitive to PD-1 blockade. Hereditary forms of cancer have been noted for more than a century, but the molecular changes underlying mismatch repair-deficient tumors and subsequent microsatellite unstable tumors was not known until the early 1990s. In this review article, we discuss the history and pathophysiology of mismatch repair, the process of testing for mismatch repair deficiency and microsatellite instability, and the role of immunotherapy in this subset of cancers.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Mismatch repair deficiency has contributed to our understanding of carcinogenesis for the past 2 decades and now identifies a subgroup of traditionally chemotherapy-insensitive solid tumors as sensitive to PD-1 blockade. This article seeks to educate oncologists regarding the nature of mismatch repair deficiency, its impact in multiple tumor types, and its implications for predicting the responsiveness of solid tumors to immune checkpoint blockade.

Mismatch Repair Deficiency and Response to Immune Checkpoint Blockade

: More than 1.6 million new cases of cancer will be diagnosed in the U.S. in 2016, resulting in more than 500,000 deaths. Although chemotherapy has been the mainstay of treatment in advanced cancers, immunotherapy development, particularly with PD-1 inhibitors, has changed the face of treatment for a number of tumor types. One example is the subset of tumors characterized by mismatch repair deficiency and microsatellite instability that are highly sensitive to PD-1 blockade. Hereditary forms of cancer have been noted for more than a century, but the molecular changes underlying mismatch repair-deficient tumors and subsequent microsatellite unstable tumors was not known until the early 1990s. In this review article, we discuss the history and pathophysiology of mismatch repair, the process of testing for mismatch repair deficiency and microsatellite instability, and the role of immunotherapy in this subset of cancers.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Mismatch repair deficiency has contributed to our understanding of carcinogenesis for the past 2 decades and now identifies a subgroup of traditionally chemotherapy-insensitive solid tumors as sensitive to PD-1 blockade. This article seeks to educate oncologists regarding the nature of mismatch repair deficiency, its impact in multiple tumor types, and its implications for predicting the responsiveness of solid tumors to immune checkpoint blockade.

Somatic microsatellite variability as a predictive marker for colorectal cancer and liver cancer progression

Microsatellites (MSTs) are short tandem repeated genetic motifs that comprise ~3% of the genome. MST instability (MSI), defined as acquired/lost primary alleles at a small subset of microsatellite loci (e.g. Bethesda markers), is a clinically relevant marker for colorectal cancer. However, these markers are not applicable to other types of cancers, specifically, for liver cancer which has a high mortality rate. Here we show that somatic MST variability (SMV), defined as the presence of additional, non-primary (aka minor) alleles at MST loci, is a complementary measure of MSI, and a genetic marker for colorectal and liver cancer. Re-analysis of Illumina sequenced exomes from The Cancer Genome Atlas indicates that SMV may distinguish a subpopulation of African American patients with colorectal cancer, which represents ~33% of the population in this study. Further, for liver cancer, a higher rate of SMV may be indicative of an earlier age of onset. The work presented here suggests that classical MSI should be expanded to include SMV, going beyond alterations of the primary alleles at a small number of microsatellite loci. This measure of SMV may represent a potential new diagnostic for a variety of cancers and may provide new information for colorectal cancer patients.

Association between IHC and MSI testing to identify mismatch repair-deficient patients with ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

In epithelial ovarian cancer, concordance between results of microsatellite instability (MSI) and immunohistochemical (IHC) testing has not been demonstrated. This study evaluated the association of MSI-high (MSI-H) status with loss of expression (LoE) of mismatch repair (MMR) proteins on IHC and assessed for potential factors affecting the strength of the association.

METHODS

Tumor specimens from three population-based studies of epithelial ovarian cancer were stained for MMR proteins through manual or automated methods, and results were interpreted by one of two pathologists. Tumor and germline DNA was extracted and MSI testing performed. Multivariable logistic regression models were fitted to predict loss of IHC expression based on MSI status after adjusting for staining method and reading pathologist.

RESULTS

Of 834 cases, 564 (67.6%) were concordant; 41 were classified as MSI-H with LoE and 523 as microsatellite stable (MSS) with no LoE. Of the 270 discordant cases, 83 were MSI-H with no LoE and 187 were MSS with LoE. Both IHC staining method and reading pathologist were strongly associated with discordant results.

CONCLUSIONS

Lack of concordance in the current study may be related to inconsistencies in IHC testing methods and interpretation. Results support the need for validation studies before routine screening of ovarian tumors is implemented in clinical practice for the purpose of identifying Lynch syndrome.