1
|
Saili K, de Jager C, Masaninga F, Chisanga B, Sinyolo A, Chiwaula J, Chirwa J, Hamainza B, Chanda E, Bakyaita NN, Mutero CM. Community perceptions, acceptability, and the durability of house screening interventions against exposure to malaria vectors in Nyimba district, Zambia. BMC Public Health 2024; 24:285. [PMID: 38267927 PMCID: PMC10809574 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-17750-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 01/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND House screening remains conspicuously absent in national malaria programs despite its recognition by the World Health Organization as a supplementary malaria vector-control intervention. This may be attributed, in part, to the knowledge gap in screen durability or longevity in local climatic conditions and community acceptance under specific cultural practices and socio-economic contexts. The objectives of this study were to assess the durability of window and door wire mesh screens a year after full house screening and to assess the acceptability of the house screening intervention to the participants involved. METHODS This study was conducted in Nyimba district, Zambia and used both quantitative and qualitative methods of data collection and analysis. Both direct observation and questionnaires were employed to assess the durability of the screens and the main reasons for damage. Findings on damage were summarized as percentages. Focus group discussions were used to assess people's knowledge, perceptions, and acceptability of the closing eaves and house screening intervention. Deductive coding and inductive coding were used to analyse the qualitative data. RESULTS A total of 321 out of 400 (80.3%) household owners of screened houses were interviewed. Many window screens (90.3%) were intact. In sharp contrast, most door screens were torn (n = 150; 46.7%) or entirely removed (n = 55; 17.1%). Most doors (n = 114; 76%) had their wire mesh damaged or removed on the bottom half. Goats (25.4%), rust (17.6%) and children (17.1%) were cited most as the cause of damage to door screens. The focus group discussion elicited positive experiences from the participants following the closing of eaves and screening of their windows and doors, ranging from sleeping peacefully due to reduced mosquito biting and/or nuisance and having fewer insects in the house. Participants linked house screening to reduced malaria in their households and community. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated that in rural south-east Zambia, closing eaves and screening windows and doors was widely accepted. Participants perceived that house screening reduced human-vector contact, reduced the malaria burden and nuisance biting from other potentially disease carrying insects. However, screened doors are prone to damage, mainly by children, domestic animals, rust, and termites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kochelani Saili
- International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, P.O. Box 30772-00100, Kenya.
- School of Health Systems & Public Health, University of Pretoria Institute for Sustainable Malaria Control, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
| | - Christiaan de Jager
- School of Health Systems & Public Health, University of Pretoria Institute for Sustainable Malaria Control, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | | | - Brian Chisanga
- International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, P.O. Box 30772-00100, Kenya
- Development Economics Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands
| | - Andy Sinyolo
- National Malaria Elimination Centre, Lusaka, Zambia
| | | | - Jacob Chirwa
- National Malaria Elimination Centre, Lusaka, Zambia
| | | | - Emmanuel Chanda
- World Health Organization, Regional Office, Brazzaville, Congo
| | | | - Clifford Maina Mutero
- International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, P.O. Box 30772-00100, Kenya
- School of Health Systems & Public Health, University of Pretoria Institute for Sustainable Malaria Control, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Saili K, de Jager C, Sangoro OP, Nkya TE, Masaninga F, Mwenya M, Sinyolo A, Hamainza B, Chanda E, Fillinger U, Mutero CM. Anopheles rufipes implicated in malaria transmission both indoors and outdoors alongside Anopheles funestus and Anopheles arabiensis in rural south-east Zambia. Malar J 2023; 22:95. [PMID: 36927373 PMCID: PMC10018844 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-023-04489-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Accepted: 02/12/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The primary malaria vector-control interventions, indoor residual spraying and long-lasting insecticidal nets, are effective against indoor biting and resting mosquito species. Consequently, outdoor biting and resting malaria vectors might elude the primary interventions and sustain malaria transmission. Varied vector biting and resting behaviour calls for robust entomological surveillance. This study investigated the bionomics of malaria vectors in rural south-east Zambia, focusing on species composition, their resting and host-seeking behaviour and sporozoite infection rates. METHODS The study was conducted in Nyimba District, Zambia. Randomly selected households served as sentinel houses for monthly collection of mosquitoes indoors using CDC-light traps (CDC-LTs) and pyrethrum spray catches (PSC), and outdoors using only CDC-LTs for 12 months. Mosquitoes were identified using morphological taxonomic keys. Specimens belonging to the Anopheles gambiae complex and Anopheles funestus group were further identified using molecular techniques. Plasmodium falciparum sporozoite infection was determined using sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. RESULTS From 304 indoor and 257 outdoor light trap-nights and 420 resting collection, 1409 female Anopheles species mosquitoes were collected and identified morphologically; An. funestus (n = 613; 43.5%), An. gambiae sensu lato (s.l.)(n = 293; 20.8%), Anopheles pretoriensis (n = 282; 20.0%), Anopheles maculipalpis (n = 130; 9.2%), Anopheles rufipes (n = 55; 3.9%), Anopheles coustani s.l. (n = 33; 2.3%), and Anopheles squamosus (n = 3, 0.2%). Anopheles funestus sensu stricto (s.s.) (n = 144; 91.1%) and Anopheles arabiensis (n = 77; 77.0%) were the dominant species within the An. funestus group and An. gambiae complex, respectively. Overall, outdoor CDC-LTs captured more Anopheles mosquitoes (mean = 2.25, 95% CI 1.22-3,28) than indoor CDC-LTs (mean = 2.13, 95% CI 1.54-2.73). Fewer resting mosquitoes were collected with PSC (mean = 0.44, 95% CI 0.24-0.63). Sporozoite infectivity rates for An. funestus, An. arabiensis and An. rufipes were 2.5%, 0.57% and 9.1%, respectively. Indoor entomological inoculation rates (EIRs) for An. funestus s.s, An. arabiensis and An. rufipes were estimated at 4.44, 1.15 and 1.20 infectious bites/person/year respectively. Outdoor EIRs for An. funestus s.s. and An. rufipes at 7.19 and 4.31 infectious bites/person/year, respectively. CONCLUSION The findings of this study suggest that An. rufipes may play an important role in malaria transmission alongside An. funestus s.s. and An. arabiensis in the study location.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kochelani Saili
- International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (Icipe), P.O. Box 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya. .,University of Pretoria Institute for Sustainable Malaria Control, School of Health Systems and Public Health, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
| | - Christiaan de Jager
- University of Pretoria Institute for Sustainable Malaria Control, School of Health Systems and Public Health, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Onyango P Sangoro
- International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (Icipe), P.O. Box 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Theresia E Nkya
- International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (Icipe), P.O. Box 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya.,Mbeya College of Health and Allied Sciences, University of Dar es Salaam, Mbeya, Tanzania
| | | | | | - Andy Sinyolo
- National Malaria Elimination Centre, Lusaka, Zambia
| | | | - Emmanuel Chanda
- World Health Organization, Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo
| | - Ulrike Fillinger
- International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (Icipe), P.O. Box 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Clifford M Mutero
- International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (Icipe), P.O. Box 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya.,University of Pretoria Institute for Sustainable Malaria Control, School of Health Systems and Public Health, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Echodu DC, Yeka A, Eganyu T, Odude W, Bukenya F, Amoah B, Wanzira H, Colborn K, Elliott RC, Powell SE, Kilama M, Mulebeke R, Nankabirwa J, Giorgi E, Roskosky M, Omoding O, Gonahasa S, Opigo J. Impact of population based indoor residual spraying with and without mass drug administration with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine on malaria prevalence in a high transmission setting: a quasi-experimental controlled before-and-after trial in northeastern Uganda. BMC Infect Dis 2023; 23:72. [PMID: 36747133 PMCID: PMC9901833 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-023-07991-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Declines in malaria burden in Uganda have slowed. Modelling predicts that indoor residual spraying (IRS) and mass drug administration (MDA), when co-timed, have synergistic impact. This study investigated additional protective impact of population-based MDA on malaria prevalence, if any, when added to IRS, as compared with IRS alone and with standard of care (SOC). METHODS The 32-month quasi-experimental controlled before-and-after trial enrolled an open cohort of residents (46,765 individuals, 1st enumeration and 52,133, 4th enumeration) of Katakwi District in northeastern Uganda. Consented participants were assigned to three arms based on residential subcounty at study start: MDA+IRS, IRS, SOC. IRS with pirimiphos methyl and MDA with dihydroartemisinin- piperaquine were delivered in 4 co-timed campaign-style rounds 8 months apart. The primary endpoint was population prevalence of malaria, estimated by 6 cross-sectional surveys, starting at baseline and preceding each subsequent round. RESULTS Comparing malaria prevalence in MDA+IRS and IRS only arms over all 6 surveys (intention-to-treat analysis), roughly every 6 months post-interventions, a geostatistical model found a significant additional 15.5% (95% confidence interval (CI): [13.7%, 17.5%], Z = 9.6, p = 5e-20) decrease in the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) due to MDA for all ages, a 13.3% reduction in under 5's (95% CI: [10.5%, 16.8%], Z = 4.02, p = 5e-5), and a 10.1% reduction in children 5-15 (95% CI: [8.5%, 11.8%], Z = 4.7, p = 2e-5). All ages residents of the MDA + IRS arm enjoyed an overall 80.1% reduction (95% CI: [80.0%, 83.0%], p = 0.0001) in odds of qPCR confirmed malaria compared with SOC residents. Secondary difference-in-difference analyses comparing surveys at different timepoints to baseline showed aOR (MDA + IRS vs IRS) of qPCR positivity between 0.28 and 0.66 (p < 0.001). Of three serious adverse events, one (nonfatal) was considered related to study medications. Limitations include the initial non-random assignment of study arms, the single large cluster per arm, and the lack of an MDA-only arm, considered to violate equipoise. CONCLUSIONS Despite being assessed at long time points 5-7 months post-round, MDA plus IRS provided significant additional protection from malaria infection over IRS alone. Randomized trials of MDA in large areas undergoing IRS recommended as well as cohort studies of impact on incidence. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial was retrospectively registered 11/07/2018 with the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR201807166695568).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Adoke Yeka
- grid.11194.3c0000 0004 0620 0548Makerere University College of Health Sciences, School of Public Health, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Thomas Eganyu
- Pilgrim Africa, Plot 8 Engwau Road, PO Box 577, Soroti, Uganda
| | - Wycliff Odude
- Pilgrim Africa, Plot 8 Engwau Road, PO Box 577, Soroti, Uganda
| | - Fred Bukenya
- Pilgrim Africa, Plot 8 Engwau Road, PO Box 577, Soroti, Uganda
| | - Benjamin Amoah
- grid.7445.20000 0001 2113 8111School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Sir Alexander Fleming Building, South Kensington Campus, London, SW7 2AZ UK
| | | | - Kathryn Colborn
- grid.430503.10000 0001 0703 675XUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12631 East 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
| | - Richard C. Elliott
- Pilgrim Africa, 8001 14th Avenue NE, Suite A, Seattle, WA 98115 USA ,grid.184764.80000 0001 0670 228XMicron School of Materials Science and Engineering, Boise State University, Engineering Building, Suite 338, Boise, ID 83725 USA
| | | | - Maxwell Kilama
- Pilgrim Africa, Plot 8 Engwau Road, PO Box 577, Soroti, Uganda
| | - Ronald Mulebeke
- grid.11194.3c0000 0004 0620 0548Makerere University College of Health Sciences, School of Public Health, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Joaniter Nankabirwa
- grid.463352.50000 0004 8340 3103Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Emanuele Giorgi
- grid.9835.70000 0000 8190 6402Lancaster University Medical School, Centre for Health Informatics, Computing and Statistics, Lancaster, UK
| | - Mellisa Roskosky
- Pilgrim Africa, 8001 14th Avenue NE, Suite A, Seattle, WA 98115 USA ,grid.21107.350000 0001 2171 9311Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD USA
| | - Osborn Omoding
- Pilgrim Africa, Plot 8 Engwau Road, PO Box 577, Soroti, Uganda
| | - Samuel Gonahasa
- grid.463352.50000 0004 8340 3103Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Jimmy Opigo
- grid.415705.2National Malaria Control Division, Ministry of Health Uganda, Kampala, Uganda
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nankabirwa JI, Arinaitwe E, Briggs J, Rek J, Rosenthal PJ, Kamya MR, Olwoch P, Smith DL, Rodriguez-Barraquer I, Dorsey G, Greenhouse B. Simulating the Impacts of Augmenting Intensive Vector Control with Mass Drug Administration or Test-and-Treat Strategies on the Malaria Infectious Reservoir. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2022; 107:1028-1035. [PMID: 36191870 PMCID: PMC9709029 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.21-0953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2021] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Highly effective vector control can reduce malaria burden significantly, but individuals with parasitemia provide a potential reservoir for onward transmission. We performed an empirical, non-parametric simulation based on cohort data from Tororo District, Uganda-an area with historically high but recently reduced malaria transmission-to estimate the effects of mass drug administration (MDA) and test-and-treat on parasite prevalence. We estimate that a single round of MDA would have accelerated declines in parasite prevalence dramatically over 2 years (cumulative parasite prevalence ratio [PPR], 0.34). This decline was mostly during the first year of administration (PPR, 0.23) and waned by 23 months (PPR, 0.74). Test-and-treat using a highly sensitive diagnostic had nearly the same effect as MDA at 1 year (PPR, 0.27) and required many fewer treatments. The impact of test-and-treat using a standard diagnostic was modest (PPR, 0.58 at 1 year). Our analysis suggests that in areas experiencing a dramatic reduction in malaria prevalence, MDA or test-and-treat with a highly sensitive diagnostic may be an effective way of reducing or eliminating the infectious reservoir temporarily. However, for sustained benefits, repeated rounds of the intervention or additional interventions are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joaniter I. Nankabirwa
- Department of Internal Medicine, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda
- Infectious Disease Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda
| | | | - Jessica Briggs
- Department of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - John Rek
- Infectious Disease Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Philip J. Rosenthal
- Department of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Moses R. Kamya
- Department of Internal Medicine, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda
- Infectious Disease Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Peter Olwoch
- Infectious Disease Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda
| | - David L. Smith
- Department of Health Metrics Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Isabel Rodriguez-Barraquer
- Department of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Grant Dorsey
- Department of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Bryan Greenhouse
- Department of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Emerson C, Meline J, Linn A, Wallace J, Kapella BK, Venkatesan M, Steketee R. End Malaria Faster: Taking Lifesaving Tools Beyond “Access” to “Reach” All People in Need. Glob Health Sci Pract 2022; 10:GHSP-D-22-00118. [PMID: 35487558 PMCID: PMC9053156 DOI: 10.9745/ghsp-d-22-00118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
To “reach the unreached” with preventive and curative malaria services, we must know which individuals and communities remain unreached and then bring tailored services from the clinic to the community and home.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney Emerson
- U.S. President's Malaria Initiative, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| | - Jed Meline
- U.S. President's Malaria Initiative, United States Agency for International Development, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Anne Linn
- U.S. President's Malaria Initiative, United States Agency for International Development, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Julie Wallace
- U.S. President's Malaria Initiative, United States Agency for International Development, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Bryan K Kapella
- U.S. President's Malaria Initiative, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Meera Venkatesan
- U.S. President's Malaria Initiative, United States Agency for International Development, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Richard Steketee
- U.S. President's Malaria Initiative, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|