Kinematic and Injury Response of Reclined PMHS in Frontal Impacts

Simulative investigation of the required level of geometrical individualization of the lumbar spines to predict fractures

Injury mechanisms of the lumbar spine under dynamic loading are dependent on spine curvature and anatomical variation. Impact simulation with finite element (FE) models can assist the reconstruction and prediction of injuries. The objective of this study was to determine which level of individualization of a baseline FE lumbar spine model is necessary to replicate experimental responses and fracture locations in a dynamic experiment.Experimental X-rays from 26 dynamic drop tower tests were used to create three configurations of a lumbar spine model (T12 to L5): baseline, with aligned vertebrae (positioned), and with aligned and morphed vertebrae (morphed). Each model was simulated with the corresponding loading and boundary conditions from dynamic lumbar spine experiments. Force, moment, and kinematic responses were compared to the experimental data. Cosine similarity was computed to assess how well simulation responses match the experimental data. The pressure distribution within the vertebrae was used to compare fracture risk and fracture location between the different models.The positioned models replicated the injured spinal level and the fracture patterns quite well, though the morphed models provided slightly more accuracy. However, for impact reconstruction or injury prediction, the authors recommend pure positioning for whole-body models, as the gain in accuracy was relatively small, while the morphing modifications of the model require considerably higher efforts. These results improve the understanding of the application of human body models to investigate lumbar injury mechanisms with FE models.

Effect of seat back angle on preferred seat pan inclination for the development of highly automated vehicles

Recent studies on occupants' safety in reclined positions suggest that a more inclined seat pan could be needed to reduce the occurrence of submarining. This study aimed to investigate whether a more inclined seat pan would also be comfortable for occupants. Eighteen volunteers participated in the experiment. They were asked to self-select seat pan inclination for seat back angles from 20 to 60 degrees using a reconfigurable experimental seat from two initial seat pan angles (10 and 40 degrees from the horizontal). On average, preferred seat pan angle varied from 11.3(±2.1, standard deviation) to 29.9(±6.8), 12.5(±3.8) to 37.4(±3.7), and 12.8(±4.8) to 38.6(±2.7) degrees for seat pan angles of 20, 40, and 60 degrees respectively. The shear force analysis suggests that the seat pan inclination might be self-selected to reduce the forward shear, while a high inclination angle with a noticeable backward shear was also preferred.Practitioner summary: Preferred range of seat pan inclination for different seat back angles studied for the development of highly automated vehicles. The present work provides quantitative guidelines for specifying comfortable seating in a reclined position.

The influence of seated postures and anthropometry on lap belt fit in vehicle occupants: A 3D computed tomography study

OBJECTIVE

In vehicle frontal collisions, it is crucial that the lap belt is designed to engage with the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) of occupants for a reliable restraint. This study aims to understand the influence of different seated postures on the geometrical relationship of the seat belt and the pelvis for various occupants using 3D upright and supine computed tomography (CT) systems.

METHODS

The 3D shapes of bones and soft tissues around the pelvis were acquired through a CT scan for 30 participants. They were seated in a rigid seat equipped with a lap belt simulating the front seat of a small car, and wore a lap belt in three seated postures: upright, slouched and reclined. Parameters related to the likelihood of submarining occurrences, such as belt-ASIS overlap (an index for assessing the potential engagement of the lap belt with the ASIS) and the belt-pelvis angle (the difference between the belt angle and the normal direction of the anterior edge of the ilium) were compared.

RESULTS

It was observed that the pelvis angle tilted rearward as the hip point was positioned forward and seatback angle increased. This can be seen in the slouched and reclined posture. The belt-pelvis angle was comparable between the slouched and the reclined postures, and was closer to zero (indicating that the lap belt path is closer to perpendicular to the anterior edge of the ilium) compared to the upright posture. In contrast, the belt-ASIS overlap increased with an increasing flesh margin of the ASIS and shallower belt angle. This suggests that the belt-pelvis angle is influenced by the seated posture whereas the belt-ASIS overlap is dependent more on an individual's anthropometry. The plot of belt-pelvis angle and belt-ASIS overlap exhibited significant variability among participants.

CONCLUSIONS

The belt-pelvis angle and the belt-ASIS overlap of individuals will provide valuable information for understanding the current belt-fit location and predicting submarining occurrences for individuals in various postures when designing restraint systems.

Assessing injury risks of reclined occupants in a frontal crash preceded by braking with varied seatbelt designs using the SAFER Human Body Model

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated the effects of different seatbelt geometries and load-limiting levels on the kinematics and injury risks of a reclined occupant during a whole-sequence frontal crash scenario, using simulations with the Active SAFER Human Body Model (Active SHBM).

METHODS

The Active SHBM was positioned in a reclined position (50°) on a semi-rigid seat model. A whole-sequence frontal crash scenario, an 11 m/s2 Automated Emergency Braking (AEB) phase followed by a frontal crash at 50 km/h, was simulated. The seatbelt geometry was varied using either a B-pillar-integrated (BPI) or Belt-in-seat (BIS) design. The shoulder belt load-limiting level of the BPI seatbelt was also varied to achieve either similar shoulder belt forces (BPI_Lower_LL) or comparable upper body displacements (BPI_Higher_LL) to the BIS seatbelt. Kinematics of different body regions and seatbelt forces were compared. The risks of sustaining a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), two or more fractured ribs (NFR2+), and lumbar spine vertebral fractures were also compared.

RESULTS

During the pre-crash phase, head, first thoracic vertebra, and first lumbar vertebra displacements were greater with the BPI seatbelt than with the BIS, mainly due to the lack of initial contact between the torso and the seatbelt. Pelvis pre-crash displacements, however, remained consistent across seatbelt types. In the in-crash phase, variations in shoulder belt forces were directly influenced by the different load-limiting levels of the shoulder belt. The mTBI (around 20%) and NFR2+ (around 70-100%) risks were amplified with BPI seatbelts, especially at higher load-limiting force. However, the BPI design demonstrated reduced lumbar spine fracture risks (from 30% to 1%).

CONCLUSIONS

The BIS seatbelt appears promising, as seen with the reduced mTBI and NFR2+ risks, for ensuring the protection of reclined occupants in frontal crashes. However, additional solutions, such as lap belt load limiting, should be considered to reduce lumbar spine loading.

Predictive modeling of submarining risk in car occupants based on pelvis angle and lap belt positioning

OBJECTIVE

The engagement of the lap belt with the pelvis is critical for occupant safety during vehicle frontal crashes to prevent occupant submarining. This study aims to develop a predictive model for submarining risk based on anthropometric parameters and lap belt positioning using finite element (FE) analyses.

METHODS

FE analyses were conducted using human body models representing various body shapes (a 50th percentile male, low and high BMI males, and a 5th percentile female) in three seated postures (standard, reclined, and slouched). The lap belt-ASIS overlap and the belt-pelvis angle were used as key parameters for predicting submarining risk. A logistic regression analysis was utilized to correlate submarining occurrence with the initial values of these two parameters at the beginning of impact. Subsequently, this submarining prediction model was applied to computer tomography (CT) measurements of human subjects in different seated postures (upright, reclined, and slouched), and submarining risks were calculated based on the developed model.

RESULTS

FE simulations indicated that submarining was more likely to occur as the initial belt-pelvis angle approached zero and there was a smaller initial belt-ASIS overlap. The logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the initial belt-pelvis angle and belt-ASIS overlap were statistically significant for predicting submarining risk. The derived model effectively distinguished submarining occurrence based on the initial values of these two parameters. The application of the submarining model to CT measurements of human subjects showed that submarining risk was lower in the order of upright, slouched, and reclined postures. In the reclined posture, the high submarining risk was attributed to a small belt-ASIS overlap and a rearward-tilted pelvis angle; whereas in the slouched posture, the risk was mostly associated with a rearward-tilted pelvis angle.

CONCLUSIONS

The submarining prediction model was developed based on the belt-pelvis angle and the belt-ASIS overlap. This predictive model may help to design restraint systems for various body types and seated postures of occupants.

Comparison of thoracolumbar spine kinematics and injuries in reclined frontal impact sled tests between mid-size adult female and male PMHS

Disparities in injury tolerance and kinematic response remain understudied despite field data highlighting sex-based differences in injury risk. Furthermore, the automotive industry anticipates occupants will prefer reclined seating in highly automated vehicles. This study aimed to compare thoracolumbar spine kinematics and injuries between mid-size female and male post-mortem human subjects (PMHS) in reclined frontal impacts. Seven adult PMHS (three female, four male) were tested in reclined (50°) 50 km/h frontal impacts. The PMHS were seated on a semi-rigid seat and restrained by a prototype three-point seat belt system designed to mitigate submarining. The 3-D motions of five vertebrae and the pelvis were measured by an optical motion tracking system. Pressure transducers were inserted into intervertebral discs at three locations along the lumbar spine to track timing of lumbar vertebra fractures. Due to variations in the geometry of the pelvis and soft tissue surrounding the pelvis compared to the male subjects, the female subjects could not be positioned in the seat the same as the males, and, as a result, the females and their belt anchors needed to be translated forward in the seat to maintain similar belt geometry relative to the males. The females exhibited similar pre-test spinal curvatures and kinematics to the males. An L1 fracture was observed in one of three female subjects and two of four male subjects, and timing of these fractures were both similar (61 ∼ 65 ms) and close to the time of peak downward seat force. Generally, the female and male subjects exhibited similar kinematic and injury responses in this reclined frontal impact sled test condition.

Influences of human thorax variability on population rib fracture risk prediction using human body models

Rib fractures remain a common injury for vehicle occupants in crashes. The risk of a human sustaining rib fractures from thorax loading is highly variable, potentially due to a variability in individual factors such as material properties and geometry of the ribs and ribcage. Human body models (HBMs) with a detailed ribcage can be used as occupant substitutes to aid in the prediction of rib injury risk at the tissue level in crash analysis. To improve this capability, model parametrization can be used to represent human variability in simulation studies. The aim of this study was to identify the variations in the physical properties of the human thorax that have the most influence on rib fracture risk for the population of vehicle occupants. A total of 15 different geometrical and material factors, sourced from published literature, were varied in a parametrized SAFER HBM. Parametric sensitivity analyses were conducted for two crash configurations, frontal and near-side impacts. The results show that variability in rib cortical bone thickness, rib cortical bone material properties, and rib cross-sectional width had the greatest influence on the risk for an occupant to sustain two or more fractured ribs in both impacts. Therefore, it is recommended that these three parameters be included in rib fracture risk analysis with HBMs for the population of vehicle occupants.

Investigation of Potential Injury Patterns and Occupant Kinematicsin Frontal Impact with PMHS in Reclined Postures

The reality of the autonomous vehicle in a near future is growing and is expected to induce significant change inthe occupant posture with respect to a standard driving posture. The delegated driving would allow sleeping and/or resting in a seatwith a reclined posture. However, the data in the literature are rare on the body kinematics, human tolerance, and injury types insuch reclined postures. The current study aims at increasing the knowledge in the domain and providing useful data to assess therelevance of the standard injury assessment tools such as anthropomorphic test devices or finite element human body models. For that purpose, a test series of three male Post-Mortem Human Subjects (PMHS) were performed in frontal impact at a 13.4 m/sdelta V. The backseat inclination was 58 degrees with respect to the vertical axis. The semi-rigid seat developed by Uriot et al.(2015) was used with a stiffer seat ramp. The restraint was composed of a lap belt equipped with two 3.5 kN load limiters, and ofa shoulder belt equipped of a 4 kN load limiter on the upper anchorage placed in the vicinity of the shoulder. The belts, the semi-rigid seat, and the footrest were equipped with force sensors. The rotations of the seat pan and of the seat ramp were also measured. The PMHS were instrumented with multi-axis accelerometers and Y angular velocity sensors attached to the head, thorax (T1 andT12 vertebrae), and sacrum. Strain gauges were glued onto the anterior face of the L1 to L5 lumbar vertebrae and onto the anteriorface of the iliac wings. To estimate the pelvis kinematics, a rigid support equipped with targets was fixed onto the femur shaft. Prior to test, X-ray imagery was performed to exhibit the initial curvature of the lumbar spine. After the tests, an in-depth necropsywas done, with a specific attention to the lumbar spine. In the chosen test conditions, no lap-belt submarining was observed for the three PMHS. One PMHS sustained an AIS2 pelvic ringfracture and another one sustained an AIS4 injury with complete separation of the left and right sacroiliac joints. Lumbar discruptures and vertebral fractures were observed for the three PMHS (AIS 2 and AIS3 coding). The number of separated rib fractureswere very different from one PMHS to another (0, 6 and 33). Response corridors for the external forces and kinematics were builtand are presented in the paper. The results are discussed by comparing with existing data for which the backseat was in standardposture.

Obese Occupant Response in Reclined and Upright Seated Postures in Frontal Impacts

The American population is getting heavier and automated vehicles will accommodate unconventional postures. While studies replicating mid-size and upright fore-aft seated occupants are numerous, experiments with post-mortem human subjects (PMHS) with obese and reclined occupants are sparse. The objective of this study was to compare the kinematics of the head-neck, torso and pelvis, and document injuries and injury patterns in frontal impacts. Six PMHS with a mean body mass index of 38.2 ± 5.3 kg/m2 were equally divided between upright and reclined groups (seatback: 23°, 45°), restrained by a three-point integrated belt, positioned on a semi-rigid seat, and exposed to low and moderate velocities (15, 32 km/h). Data included belt loads, spinal accelerations, kinematics, and injuries from x-rays, computed tomography, and necropsy. At 15 km/h speed, no significant difference in the occupant kinematics and evidence of orthopedic failure was observed. At 32 km/h speed, the primary difference between the cohorts was significantly larger Z displacements in the reclined occupant at the head (190 ± 32 mm, vs. 105 ± 33 mm p < 0.05) and femur (52 ± 18 mm vs. 30 ± 10 mm, p < 0.05). All the moderate-speed tests produced at least one thorax injury. Rib fractures were scattered around the circumference of the rib-cage in the upright, while they were primarily concentrated on the anterior aspect of the rib-cage in two reclined specimens. Although MAIS was the same in both groups, the reclined specimens had more bi-cortical rib fractures, suggesting the potential for pneumothorax. While not statistical, these results suggest enhanced injuries with reclined obese occupants. These results could serve as a data set for validating the response of restrained obese anthropometric test device (ATDs) and computational human body models.

Comparison of small female occupant model responses with experimental data in a reclined posture

Objective: The objective of the current study was to compare the GHBMC female model responses with in-house sled test data for three small female post mortem human surrogates (PMHS) at 32 km/h and a seatback recline angle of 45 degrees. The kinematics and the seatbelt forces were used to compare the female PMHS and model responses. The study aimed to identify updates that may be needed to the model.Methods: In-house experimental sled test kinematic and seatbelt response data for the small females were obtained. The 5^th female GHBMC was simulated with the same boundary conditions as in the experiments. In addition, using the PMHS computed tomography (CT) and test environment scans, the female model geometry was updated to a subject-specific model for one of the specimens, and the models were simulated to obtain 5^th female and subject-specific model responses. The kinematic response and the seatbelt forces for the two models were compared with the average of the three experimental data.Results: The head, T8 and L4 excursions, head and pelvis accelerations and seatbelt forces for the two female models were compared with the experimental data. The model responses were in agreement with the PMHS; however, the subject-specific model showed a closer agreement with the kinematic response. The subject-specific model did not submarine as in the experiments, whereas the 5^th female model submarined. However, the subject-specific model showed 20% higher seatbelt forces than the PMHS.Conclusion: This study showed that anthropometric differences may significantly alter occupant kinematics in reclined posture and need to be incorporated to investigate kinematics and injury mechanisms. The next step of the study involves incorporating age-specific material changes and investigating the subject-specific injury mechanisms. The results will be useful to develop countermeasures for autonomous vehicles.

Analysis of Lap Belt Fit to Human Subjects using CT Images

In vehicle collisions, the lap belt should engage the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS). In this study, threedimensional (3D) shapes of bones and soft tissues around the pelvis were acquired using a computed tomography (CT) scan of 10 male and 10 female participants wearing a lap belt. Standing, upright sitting, and reclined postures were scanned using an upright CT and a supine CT scan system. In the upright sitting posture, the thigh height was larger with a higher BMI while the ASIS height did not change significantly with BMI. As a result, the height of the ASIS relative to the thigh (ASIS-thigh height) became smaller as the BMI increased. Because the thigh height of females was smaller than that of males, the ASIS-thigh height was larger for females than for males. As the ASIS-thigh height was larger, the overlap of the lap belt with the ASIS increased. Thus, the lap belt overlapped more with the ASIS for the females than for the males. The abdomen outer shape is characterized by the trouser cord formed valley, the torso/thigh junction, and the anterior convexity formed between them depending on the adipose tissues. The abdomen outer shapes changed from the standing, the reclined posture to the upright sitting posture. In the reclined sitting posture, the lap belt is positioned upward and rearward relative to the ASIS, and the overlap of the lap belt with the ASIS was smaller compared to the upright posture.