Quality indicators in inflammatory bowel disease

Clinical outcomes amongst elderly patients with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUNDS AND AIMS

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) affects a growing cohort of elderly patients. Our aim was to compare the quality of care received by elderly patients with IBD with a nonelderly adult IBD population using clinical markers including steroid-free clinical remission.

METHOD

Retrospective audit of all consecutive patients attending a specialist IBD centre over a 1-year period aged >60 (elderly cohort [EC]) and 50 consecutive patients aged 30-45 years (control cohort [CC]). A follow-up survey was completed assessing current symptoms and perceptions of care.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-nine patients were evaluated (89 EC, 50 CC). Steroid-free clinical remission was observed less commonly in the EC (58, 64%) compared with the CC (40, 80%) (P < 0.05). Biologics such as infliximab (15% EC vs 36% CC; P < 0.01) and adalimumab (14% EC vs 30% CC; P = 0.02) were used less frequently in the EC, whilst vedolizumab (6% EC vs 6% CC; P = 1) and ustekinumab (3% EC vs 2% CC; P = 1) were used at a similar frequency. Patients in the EC were less likely to have specialist IBD nursing contact (P < 0.01), smoking screening (P < 0.011) or influenza vaccinations (P < 0.006). IBD nurse contact was associated with significantly greater provision of the preventative care measures.

CONCLUSION

Elderly patients with IBD were less likely to experience steroid-free clinical remission or be prescribed biologics. Elderly patients were less likely to receive education with respect to preventative medicine. The models of care for the elderly need re-evaluation and greater incorporation with the multidisciplinary IBD team.

Challenges and Strategies to Optimising the Quality of Small Bowel Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Crohn’s Disease

Magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) is one of the most highly utilised tools in the assessment of patients with small bowel Crohn’s disease (CD). As a non-invasive modality, it has both patient and procedure-related advantages over ileocolonoscopy which is the current gold standard for Crohn’s disease activity assessment. MRE relies upon high-quality images to ensure accurate disease activity assessment; however, few studies have explored the impact of image quality on the accuracy of small bowel CD activity assessment. Bowel distension and motion artifacts are two key imaging parameters that impact the quality of images obtained through MRE. Multiple strategies have been employed to both minimise the effects of motion artifacts and improve bowel distension. This review discusses the definitions of bowel distension and motion artifacts within the literature with a particular focus on current strategies to improve bowel distension and limit motion artifacts in MRE.

Quantification of Mucosal Activity from Colonoscopy Reports via the Simplified Endoscopic Mucosal Assessment for Crohn's Disease

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic mucosal healing is the gold standard for evaluating Crohn's disease (CD) treatment efficacy. Standard endoscopic indices are not routinely used in clinical practice, limiting the quality of retrospective research. A method for retrospectively quantifying mucosal activity from documentation is needed. We evaluated the simplified endoscopic mucosal assessment for CD (SEMA-CD) to determine if it can accurately quantify mucosal severity recorded in colonoscopy reports.

METHODS

Pediatric patients with CD underwent colonoscopy that was video recorded and evaluated via Simple Endoscopic Score for CD (SES-CD) and SEMA-CD by central readers. Corresponding colonoscopy reports were de-identified. Central readers blinded to clinical history and video scoring were randomly assigned colonoscopy reports with and without images. The SEMA-CD was scored for each report. Correlation with video SES-CD and SEMA-CD were assessed with Spearman rho, inter-rater, and intrarater reliability with kappa statistics.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven colonoscopy reports were read a total of 347 times. The simplified endoscopic mucosal assessment for CD without images correlated with both SES-CD and SEMA-CD from videos (rho = 0.82, P < .0001 for each). The addition of images provided similar correlation. Inter-rater and intrarater reliability were 0.93 and 0.92, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The SEMA-CD applied to retrospective evaluation of colonoscopy reports accurately and reproducibly correlates with SES-CD and SEMA-CD of colonoscopy videos. The SEMA-CD for evaluating colonoscopy reports will enable quantifying mucosal healing in retrospective research. Having objective outcome data will enable higher-quality research to be conducted across multicenter collaboratives and in clinical registries. External validation is needed.

Interventions to Decrease Unplanned Healthcare Utilization and Improve Quality of Care in Adults With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) care and outcomes exhibit substantial variability, suggesting quality gaps. We aimed to identify interventions to narrow these gaps.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of Medline, Embase, and Web of Science through May 2021 to find manuscripts and abstracts reporting quality improvement (QI) interventions in IBD. We included studies with interventions that addressed acute care utilization, vaccination, or Crohn's and Colitis Foundation quality indicators for care processes, including pre-therapy testing, tobacco cessation, colorectal cancer surveillance, Clostridium difficile infection screening in flares, sigmoidoscopy in patients hospitalized with ulcerative colitis, and use of steroid-sparing therapy. The primary objective was to identify successful QI interventions. Risk of bias assessment was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist.

RESULTS

Twenty-three manuscripts and 23 meeting abstracts met inclusion criteria. Influenza and pneumococcal vaccination were the most studied indicators (24 references), followed by emergency room and/or hospital utilization, tobacco cessation, and pre-therapy testing (17, 11, and 10 references, respectively). Electronic medical record-based interventions were the most frequent, whereas other initiatives used strategies that included changes to care structure or delivery, vaccination protocols, or physician and patient education. Successful interventions matched the complexity of the metric to the intervention including making changes to care structure or delivery, empowered non-physician staff, and used electronic medical record changes to prompt clinicians.

CONCLUSIONS

The quality of IBD care can be improved with diverse interventions that range from simple to complex. However, these interventions are not universally successful. Clinicians should emulate successful interventions and design new initiatives to narrow gaps in care quality.

Secondary Indicators for an Evaluation and Guidance System for Quality of Care in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centers: A Critical Review of the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Quality of Care Center

The number of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has increased remarkably in recent years. However, the level of health care for IBD patients varies greatly among regions of China. Standardization of health care for IBD patients is essential to improve quality of care (QoC). The mission of the IBD Quality Care Evaluation Center (IBDQCC) is to establish indicators for QoC. Since 2017, the IBDQCC has developed structure, process, and outcome indicators with the steering committee of IBD specialists and methodologists; 28 core and 13 secondary IBD QoC indicators were selected using a Delphi method. Applications for certification of IBD quality care units were made voluntarily and preliminarily screened through the IBDQCC committee. Regional units had to meet all core indicators, and units of excellence were required to meet all core indicators together with an additional 50% of secondary indicators. As of 2019 and 2020, 69 IBD units (all from tertiary referral hospitals) have been certified as regional IBD units in China. The certification of excellence of the IBD units is currently undergoing auditing. The awareness of and appreciation for QoC in IBD is increasing in China, especially through the quality control evaluation program initiated by the IBDQCC, with a higher number of IBD units applying for the next round of certification. Although secondary indicators seem to play relatively minor roles in QoC, they suggest additional requirements for high-level centers.

Identifying and Predicting the Goals and Concerns Prioritised by Individuals with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

In order to provide high-quality care, providers need to understand their patients' goals and concerns. This study aims to identify and predict the goals and concerns prioritised by patients with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] in the outpatient setting.

METHODS

Mixed-methods analysis was performed to identify the types, frequencies, and predictors of IBD patients' goals and concerns using 4873 surveys collected over 2016-2019 at 25 gastroenterology clinics across the USA participating in the Crohn's & Colitis Foundation's IBD Qorus Learning Health System.

RESULTS

Patients with IBD most often prioritised goals and concerns related to symptoms/disease activity [50%] and clinical course/management [20%], whereas psychosocial/quality of life [12%] and medication [6%] concerns were less frequent. Females (odds ratio [OR] 22.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.3-91.5) and patients in clinical remission [OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.2-4.1] were more likely to prioritise family planning. Patients >60 years old [OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.5-6.5] and patients with active disease [OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.4-7.6] were more often concerned about travelling. Smokers were more often concerned about nutrition [OR 4.2, 95% CI 1.9-9.2]. Surgery was more often a concern of patients with perianal Crohn's disease [OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.2-3.5], active disease [OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.4], and those with recent hospitalisations [OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.2-5.4].

CONCLUSIONS

IBD patients prioritised the remission of physical symptoms as treatment goals and they were less frequently concerned about medications and their side effects. Patients' demographics, IBD characteristics, and health care utilisation patterns can predict specific types of concerns/goals.

A Quality Improvement Initiative Is Associated With Reduced Time to Administer Biologics and Small Molecules and Emergency Room Visits in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

Delays in biologic or small molecule medication administration are associated with increased adverse events, hospitalization, and surgery in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We evaluated the impact of a quality improvement (QI) intervention on the time to administration of biologics or small molecules (TABS) in IBD.

METHODS

Data were retrospectively extracted for IBD patients prescribed biologics or small molecules from a convenience sample of providers participating in an accredited QI educational intervention (baseline cohort). Subsequent to the intervention, data were prospectively collected from patients prescribed these medications (postintervention cohort). Dates related to steps between a treatment decision to medication administration were collected. The primary outcome compared TABS in baseline and postintervention cohorts.

RESULTS

Eighteen physicians provided survey and patient data for 200 patients in each cohort (n=400). The median time to medication administration (TABS) decreased from baseline to postintervention cohorts (30 vs. 26 d, P=0.04). Emergency room visits before medication administration also decreased (25.5% vs. 12.5%, P=0.001). Similar numerical TABS reductions were observed in subgroups limited to physicians providing patients to both cohorts and for individual medications prescribed. Primary contributors to delays included filling prescriptions subsequent to insurance approval and dispensation subsequent to this.

CONCLUSIONS

A QI intervention successfully reduced medication administration times (TABS) by accelerating provider-dependent steps. This intervention was associated with reduced emergency room visits. We propose TABS as a quality metric to assess the effective delivery of therapies in IBD. Further evaluation of QI interventions, patient education on prescription drug insurance, and quality metrics are warranted.

Latin American consensus on the quality indicators for comprehensive care clinics for patients with inflammatory bowel disease: PANCCO-GETECCU

INTRODUCTION

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic and incurable entity. The aim of the Pan American Crohn's and Colitis Organisation (PANCCO) is to create awareness of IBD, with special emphasis on Latin America, and the primary objective of the Spanish Working Group on Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis (GETECCU, the Spanish acronym) is to obtain the accreditation of the clinical and therapeutic criteria for the diagnosis and treatment of IBD.

AIM

To carry out a consensus for evaluating the approval criteria that a Comprehensive Care Clinic for Latin American IBD patients must meet, to be considered a center of excellence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fourteen clinical experts participated in the consensus. They were made up of specialists in gastroenterology, with broad clinical experience, spanning several years, in managing the care of a large number of patients with IBD, as well as advanced specialists in IBD. Thirteen of the participants came from 11 Latin American countries (Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Guatemala, Mexico, Peru, Puerto Rico, Uruguay, and Venezuela) that have IBD clinics. An expert from Spain, representing the GETECCU, provided the methodologic support. The consensus consisted of 52 statements divided into three sections: 1) Structure indicators, 2) Process indicators, and 3) Result indicators. The Delphi panel method was applied.

RESULTS

The present Latin American consensus describes the quality indicators that a Comprehensive Care Clinic for IBD patients must meet, to be considered a center of excellence, taking into account the needs of our region.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first Latin American consensus, jointly carried out by the PANCCO and GETECCU, to present accreditation standards for centers of excellence in the care of patients with IBD.

Implementation of an Inpatient IBD Service Is Associated with Improvement in Quality of Care and Long-Term Outcomes

BACKGROUND

There is wide variation in the quality of care of hospitalized patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Prior studies have demonstrated that a specialized inpatient IBD service improves short-term outcomes. In this study, we assessed the impact of a dedicated IBD service on the quality of care and long-term outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included adult patients admitted for a complication of IBD between March 2017 and February 2019 to a tertiary referral center. In March 2018, a dedicated inpatient IBD service co-managed by IBD gastroenterologists and colorectal surgeons was implemented. Quality of care outcomes included C. difficile stool testing, confirmed VTE prophylaxis administration and opiate avoidance. Long-term outcomes were clinical remission, IBD-related surgery, ED visits, and hospital readmissions at 90 days and 12 months.

RESULTS

In total, 143 patients were included; 66 pre- and 77 post-implementation of the IBD service. Fifty-two percent had ulcerative colitis and 48% had Crohn's disease. After implementation, there was improvement in C.difficile testing (90% vs. 76%, P = 0.04), early VTE prophylaxis (92% vs. 77%, P = 0.01) and decreases in narcotic use (14% vs. 30%, P = 0.02), IBD-related ED visits at 90 days (7% vs 18%, P = 0.03) and 12 months (16% vs 30%, P = 0.04), and IBD readmissions at 90 days (16% vs. 30%, P = 0.04). There were no differences in rates of clinical remission or surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The creation of a dedicated inpatient IBD service improved quality of IBD care and reduced post-discharge ED visits and readmissions and broader implementation of this strategy may help optimize care of hospitalized IBD patients.

Subjective Needs and Thoughts for the Treatment of Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Applying Q Methodology

Backgrounds/Aims

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract that requires lifetime management. Many studies have attempted to establish questionnaires and/or parameters to assess the quality of care for IBD patients. However, no study to date has investigated patients using the Q-methodology, which is subjective and has been studied systematically, to identify and categorize their opinions and subjective thinking about their disease and treatment. We have therefore aimed here to conduct a preliminary study of the Q-methodology to investigate the subjective thinking of IBD patients in Korea.

Methods

Q-methodology, a method of analyzing the subjectivity of questionnaire items, was examined in this study. Inputs from 50 IBD patients were classified into 34 normalized statements using a 9-point scale with a normal distribution. The collected data were analyzed using the QUANL PC program.

Results

Using the Q-methodology, IBD patients were classified into type I, II, III, and IV treatment needs: medical staff-dependent, relationship-oriented, information-driven, and social awareness, respectively.

Conclusions

The subjective needs of IBD patients and their thoughts about the treatment can be classified into four types. Our findings suggest that we can establish a systematic strategy for personalized care according to patient type.

New Zealand National Audit of Outpatient Inflammatory Bowel Disease Standards of Care

Aim

This study audits the delivery and standards of New Zealand (NZ) inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) care against international standards, with emphasis on the IBD nursing role.

Methods

Utilising international standards in IBD care, a 3 phase national multicentre survey study was performed between 2015 and 2019. We 1) evaluated the current role and practices of IBD nurses, 2) evaluated IBD service provision and identified areas for improvement, and 3) audited key aspects of IBD patient care, directly comparing nurse-led and doctor-led outpatient clinics.

Results

The median duration spent in an IBD nursing role was 21 months (range 2 to 120 months) with the majority (12/15) performing two or more nursing roles. The median IBD nurse full-time equivalent (FTE) was 0.8 (range 0.2 to 1.25). The average number of hours spent undertaking IBD nursing tasks was 22.2 – a 6.8-hour shortfall compared to rostered hours. No service had a per capita IBD multidisciplinary team (MDT) FTE which met international standards. Just under two-thirds (62.5%) of departments held a regular MDT meeting. All responding services could be contacted directly by IBD patients and respond within 48 hours of contact. During 492 doctor-led and 196 nurse-led scheduled outpatient clinic visits, nurses were significantly more likely to document weight, smoking status and organise appropriate colonoscopic surveillance than doctors.

Conclusion

Multiple nursing job roles resulted in rostered hours being insufficient to complete IBD specific tasks. IBD FTE did not meet international standards. The IBD care was patient-centred, encouraging direct contact from patients with prompt response. IBD nurses in NZ provide high-quality outpatient care when measured against auditable standards. As the IBD nursing role continues to develop, following the implementation of an educational framework and education programme, an increase in numbers is required in order to achieve the recommended minimum FTE per 250 000 population.

The burden of cost in inflammatory bowel disease: a medical economic perspective

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The cost of care for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has nearly doubled over the last two decades. With evolving treatment paradigms utilizing costly but efficacious biologic agents earlier and more often, the cost burden is only expected to worsen. The purpose of this review is to explore the current economic landscape and drivers of IBD healthcare costs along with potential mechanisms for improving value and cost-effectiveness of IBD care.

RECENT FINDINGS

The prevalence of IBD continues to rapidly expand with costs following suit. As compensation models change, the medical community is more incentivized than ever to develop cost reduction strategies including incorporation of high-value care measures, cooperative data aggregation, and technological solutions, with many of these interventions demonstrating promising results.

SUMMARY

IBD is an expensive chronic disease with payments only expected to rise. In light of this financial conundrum, new practice models, such as the IBD specialty medical home and remote telemedicine, are being tested with an emphasis on cost reduction. Many of these strategies are demonstrating improved patient outcomes while also curbing expenses. These early successes set the stage for continued cooperation, collaboration, and growth in value-based management of IBD.

Are Quality Metrics in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Rooted on Substantial Quality Evidence? A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Quality metrics were established to develop standards to help assess quality of care, yet variation in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) clinical practice exists. We performed a systematic review to assess the overall quality of evidence cited in formulating IBD quality metrics.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed on PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE. All major national and international IBD societies were included. Quality metrics were assessed for evidence quality and categorized as category A (guideline based), category B (primarily retrospective and observational studies) or category C (expert opinion). Quality metrics were examined for the type of metric, the quality, measurability, review, existing conflicts of interest (COI), and patient participation of the metric. Statistical analysis was conducted in R.

RESULTS

A total of 143 distinct, and an aggregate total of 217 quality metrics were included and analyzed. 68%, 3.2%, and 28.6% of IBD quality metrics were based on low, moderate, and high quality of evidence, respectively. The proportion of high quality evidence across societies was significantly different (P <0.01). Five organizations included patients in quality metric development, three reported external review, not all reported measurable outcomes or stated the presence of a COI. Finally, 43% of quality metrics were published more than 5 years ago.

CONCLUSIONS

Quality metrics are important to standardize practice. As more than two-thirds of the quality metrics in IBD are based on low quality evidence, further studies are needed to improve the overall quality of evidence supporting the development of quality measures.

Opioid Use in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Background

Data on opioid use in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and the relationship between disease, opioid use, and healthcare resource utilization are needed.

Methods

This analysis of real-world data from IBM Watson Health Commercial Claims and Encounters Database included patients with the first claim of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) between 2007 and 2014.

Results

Opioid use was higher in patients with IBD than in the matched non-IBD cohort. Adjusted for age, gender, and Charlson Comorbidity Index score, inpatient and emergency room visits risk was higher in opioid users than non-users in both IBD cohorts.

Conclusions

Opioid use could be a potential surrogate for inadequate disease control manifested by increased inpatient and emergency room visit risks. These results suggest a need exists for better disease management and the development of an outcomes measurement tool for IBD pain.

The Burden of Cost in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Medical Economic Perspective and the Future of Value-Based Care

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To examine the quantifiable economic impact of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), key cost drivers and determinants, and the impact of value-based care in IBD. Finally, we prognosticate on future directions and opportunities on healthcare economics in IBD.

RECENT FINDINGS

New value-based initiatives, technologically driven interventions, and quality improvement programs have demonstrated reductions in healthcare utilization and enhanced patient outcomes, and several have realized cost of care reductions. IBD is a costly, chronic illness with unbalanced spending by a small proportion of individuals. Pharmaceutical costs are overtaking inpatient expenses as the primary cost driver. Value-based care initiatives including the IBD medical home, remote monitoring platforms such as myIBDcoach and Project Sonar, and learning healthcare networks exemplified by ImproveCareNow have all demonstrated successes in improving care quality, patient outcomes, and reduced healthcare spending in some populations. The future of value-based care in IBD is bright, with ample opportunities for model refinement, collaboration, and growth.

The Inflammatory Bowel Disease Medical Home: From Patients to Populations

With increasing emphasis on cost reduction and quality improvement, the transition to value-based care is underway. New models of health care delivery are being explored to optimize patient experience and outcomes while decreasing health care expenses. One such model is the specialty medical home (SMH), which provides multidisciplinary, high-quality care for chronic diseases with specialist involvement, such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This review aims to explore the rationale behind initial construction, the critical personnel and components, the early outcomes of established models, comparison with other value-based care models, and the role of an IBD SMH in population health management.

Regional variations in the use of biologics and immunomodulators among Korean patients with inflammatory bowel diseases

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Variation in medical care can be an obstacle to improving quality and outcome of treatment. We conducted a nationwide, population-based study to identify regional variations in medication prescription rates in Korean patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs).

METHODS

Using the National Health Insurance claims, we collected data on patients diagnosed with IBD (8974 cases of Crohn's disease [CD] and 17 167 cases of ulcerative colitis [UC]) between 2010 and 2016.

RESULTS

Overall rates of biologics (infliximab or adalimumab) use in CD and UC were 19.6% and 6.1%, respectively, and those of immunomodulator (azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine) use were 66.9% and 20.4%, respectively. The average periods from diagnosis to first biologics use for CD and UC were 1.6 and 1.8 years, respectively, and those of immunomodulators were 0.6 and 1.3 years, respectively. In Seoul, Daegu, and Busan, three major cities in Korea, biologics prescription rates for CD were 20.7%, 22.9%, and 14.6%, respectively, and those for UC were 7.3%, 6.7%, and 4.5%, respectively. In the top 7 regions with the highest number of patients in Seoul, there were 3.6-fold and 3.2-fold variations between regions with the highest and lowest frequency of biologics use in CD and UC, respectively. In addition, there were 1.6-fold and 2.8-fold variations between regions with the highest and lowest frequency of immunomodulator use for CD and UC, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Regional variation exists in medication prescription rates within a single city as well as nationwide, suggesting that standardization of IBD treatment is necessary in Korea.

Quality improvement in healthcare for patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Since inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are chronic disorders with typical remission and relapses and no cure, maintaining high quality of provided healthcare to patients with IBD plays a major role in the management and reducing disease-related morbidity. To hone process-based quality indicators in order to ameliorate quality of care, the indicators must be based on high quality evidence and expert consensus. ImproveCareNow (ICN) group gave us a great example of quality improvement (QI) by gaining experience in how to exercise, apply and implement QI methods in the care of children with IBD. "The American Gastroenterological Association" has developed an adult "IBD physician performance measures set" and both "Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America" (CCFA) and "Crohn's and Colitis Canada" (CCC) have developed sets of most highly rated process and outcome measures. "The Emerging Practice in IBD Collaborative (EPIC) Canadian group" developed definitions of quality indicators for best-practice management of IBD in Canada. "Quality of Care through the Patient's Eyes (QUOTE-IBD)" was honed as a questionnaire to quantify quality of care in the eyes of patients with IBD. This is now widely used in several European countries. The current concepts of quality of care as well as quality indicators will be discussed in this article.

Improving the quality of care for inflammatory bowel disease

Great strides have been achieved in the development of quality-of-care measures and standards for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) over the last decade. The central structural component of care in IBD revolves around the multidisciplinary team, which should be equipped with the necessary resources to operate and implement decisions. Process measures have been defined by interest groups and can be adapted into process tools for the delivery of care for various patient subgroups and clinical scenarios. The emerging treat-to-target approach to IBD management may be used to achieve optimal long-term and holistic patient-centred outcomes, such as survival, control of inflammation and disease progression, symptomatic remission, quality of life and complications. Other important quality-of-care outcome measures for IBD include disutility of care, healthcare utilization and other patient-reported outcomes such as nutritional status and impact of fistulae. The current challenge for healthcare providers and health systems is the integration of quality-of-care structures and processes into clinical practice, and the consistent delivery of updated evidence-based quality IBD care to various patient populations by individual health care providers. Finally, the awareness and appreciation for quality of care in IBD is increasing in Asia, and Asian healthcare institutions should be encouraged to take the lead in improving the quality of care in IBD.

Increased end-stage renal disease risk in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A nationwide population-based study

AIM

To estimate the risk of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

METHODS

From January 2010 to December 2013, patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) were identified, based on both the International Classification of Diseases, 10^th revision (ICD-10) and the rare, intractable disease registration program codes from the National Health Insurance (NHI) database in South Korea. We compared 38812 patients with IBD to age- and sex-matched non-IBD controls with a ratio of 1:3. Patients newly diagnosed with ESRD were identified with the ICD-10 code.

RESULTS

During a mean follow-up of 4.9 years, ESRD was detected in 79 (0.2%) patients with IBD and 166 (0.1%) controls. The incidence of ESRD in patients with IBD was 0.42 per 1000 person-years. Patients with IBD had a significantly higher risk of ESRD than controls [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 3.03; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.77-5.20; P < 0.001]. The incidences (per 1000 person-years) of ESRD were 0.51 in patients with CD and 0.13 in controls, respectively (adjusted HR = 6.33; 95%CI: 2.75-14.56; P < 0.001). In contrast, the incidence of ESRD was similar between the UC and control groups (0.37 vs 0.37 per 1000 person-years; adjusted HR = 2.01; 95%CI: 0.90-4.51; P = 0.089).

CONCLUSION

The risk of ESRD was elevated in patients with CD, but not UC. Patients with CD should be monitored carefully for signs of renal insufficiency.

Vaccinations in Adult Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases in the West

BACKGROUND

Patients with moderate-severe inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) such as Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis are commonly treated with long-term immunosuppressive therapies involving immunomodulators such as thiopurines, biologics (anti-TNF and anti-adhesion molecules), or novel small molecules such as Janus kinase inhibitors.

SUMMARY

Some infections seen with immunosuppressive therapy in IBD are preventable with vaccines. IBD-specific immunosuppressive therapy is generally initiated by gastroenterologists. Therefore, gastroenterologists should comprehend the appropriate application of vaccines such as hepatitis B, pneumonia, and herpes zoster vaccinations. This review summarizes the current guidance for vaccinations of IBD patients in the United States.

KEY MESSAGE

Gastroenterologists treating IBD patients must be aware of necessary vaccination schedules in the setting of immunosuppressive therapies.

Medication non-adherence in inflammatory bowel diseases is associated with disability

Background/Aims

Medication non-adherence is common in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). The short-term consequences of non-adherence include increased disease relapse but the long-term impact upon patients in terms of daily functional impairment are less well characterized. Identifying negative outcomes, such as disability, may encourage adherence.

Methods

Consecutive ambulatory IBD subjects completed the Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS; non-adherence defined as ≤16), Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Disability Index (IBD-DI; disability: <3.5) and Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (high necessity/concerns: ≥16). The primary outcome was the association between medication non-adherence and disability. Secondary outcomes were the predictors of these outcomes.

Results

A total of 173 subjects on IBD maintenance medications were recruited (98 Crohn's disease, 75 ulcerative colitis: median IBD-DI, -5.0; interquartile range [IQR], -14.0 to 4.0 and median MARS, 19.0; IQR, 18 to 20) of whom 24% were non-adherent. Disability correlated significantly with medication non-adherence (r=0.38, P<0.0001). Median IBD-DI for non-adherers was significantly lower than adherers (-16.0 vs. -2.0, P<0.0001). Predictors of disability included female sex (P=0.002), previous hospitalization (P=0.023), management in a referral hospital clinic (P=0.008) and medication concerns (P<0.0001). Non-adherence was independently associated with difficulty managing bowel movements (odds ratio [OR], 3.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.50-9.16, P=0.005), rectal bleeding (OR, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.14-6.36; P=0.024) and arthralgia/arthritis (OR, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.11-5.92; P=0.028).

Conclusions

Medication non-adherence was associated with significantly increased disability in IBD. Female gender, higher disease severity and medication concerns were additional predictors of disability.