Endoscopic management of acute oesophageal variceal bleeding within 12 hours of admission is superior to 12-24 hours

Background: Acute oesophageal variceal haemorrhage (AOVH) is a medical emergency. The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases recommends endoscopy management as soon as possible and not more than 12 hours after presentation. The United Kingdom guidelines recommended endoscopy for unstable patients with severe acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding immediately after resuscitation and within 24 hours of admission. We aimed to evaluate the outcome of endoscopic management of AOVH in less than 12 hours compared to 12-24 hours post admission.Methods: 297 patients with AOVH were divided into groups depending on the timing of the endoscopic management: 180 within 12 h of admission and 117 patients at 12-24 hours of admission. Routine clinical and laboratory data were collected.Results: Compared to patients with endoscopic management at 12-24 hours (mean 16 hours), patients with endoscopic management within 12 hours (mean 8.3 hours) of admission had fewer hospital stay days (P = 0.001), significant reduction of ammonia levels (P < 0.0001) and significant improvement in associated hepatic encephalopathy grade 25 (p = 0.048). There were no major clinical events in the 12-hour group, but 8 events in the 12-24 hour group (p < 0.01).Conclusion: Endoscopic management of acute variceal bleeding within 12 hours of admission is superior to endoscopic management at 12-24 hours of admission regarding reduction of hospital stay, ammonia levels, correction of hepatic encephalopathy, re-bleeding and mortality rate, hence, reducing the cost of treatment benefiting patient satisfaction and improving hospital bed availability.

Serum leptin and homeostasis model assessment-IR as novel predictors of early liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B virus infection

BACKGROUND

The relationship between hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, leptin and insulin resistance remains unclear. We hypothesised links between serum leptin and insulin resistance in non-diabetic patients with chronic viral hepatitis B infection and their relation to liver fibrosis.

METHODS

We recruited 190 untreated patients with chronic HBV infection and 72 healthy controls. Serum leptin, fasting glucose, insulin, liver function tests (LFTs), C-peptide and Homeostasis model assessment-IR (HOMA-IR) were measured/calculated by ELISA and standard techniques.

RESULTS

Serum leptin, C-peptide (both P < 0.001), HOMA-IR (P = 0.021) and several LFTs were increased in patients with chronic HBV-infection. In multivariate regression analysis, both HOMA-IR (P = 0.003) and leptin (P = 0.002) were significant independent predictors of HBV infection. There were significant positive correlations (P < 0.01) between leptin and HOMA-IR (r = 0.81), between serum leptin and METAVIR activity (r = 0.95), and between HOMA-IR and BMI (r = 0.75), fasting glucose (r = 0.005), and fasting insulin (r = 0.81). Several LFTs, glucose and insulin correlated modestly (r = 0.61-0.69, P < 0.05) with leptin.

CONCLUSION

Serum leptin may be related to the rate of fibrosis progression in nondiabetic patients with chronic HBV infection. Follow-up by serial measurement of serum leptin and HOMA-IR in non diabetic HBV-infected patients may be used as a non-invasive marker of early liver fibrosis.

Evaluation of prostate cancer patients receiving multiple staging tests, including ProstaScint scintiscans

BACKGROUND

Multiple serum tests were performed on archival samples from patients who participated in trials to assess the ProstaScint scan staging ability. Traditional statistical analysis as well as artificial neural network (ANN) analysis were employed to evaluate individual patients and the group as a whole. The results were evaluated so that each factor was tested for prognostic value.

METHODS

Data obtained from serum tests, bone scans, and ProstaScint scans were evaluated by traditional statistical methods and ANN to determine the individual value in clinical staging of prostate cancer.

RESULTS

Two hundred seventy-five patients (180 postprostatectomy, 95 intact prostate) with prostate cancer (14 with distant metastases) were available for analysis. Data available included: clinical state (remission or progression), most recent clinical TNM stage, bone scan, and ProstaScint scan. Serum was tested for prostate-specific membrane antigen(PSMA), prostate-specific antigen(PSA), free PSA (fPSA), and complexed PSA (cPSA). Additional calculations included percent free PSA, and percent complexed PSA. Spearman individual statistical assessment for traditional group evaluation revealed no significant factors for T-stage. The free PSA and complex PSA had a significant association with node (N)-status. The distant metastases (M) stage correlated well with the bone scan and clinical stage. ANN analysis revealed no significant T-stage factors. N-stage factors showed a 95% sensitivity and 49% specificity. These factors included the presence or absence of a prostate, PSA serum levels, bone scan, and ProstaScint scans as major associated indicators. ANN analysis of the important variables for M-stage included ProstaScint scan score, and PSA levels (total, percent complexed, percent free, and fPSA). These factors were associated with a 95% sensitivity and 15% specificity level.

CONCLUSIONS

Two hundred seventy-five patients receiving treatment for prostate cancer were evaluated by ANN and traditional statistical analysis for factors related to stage of disease. ANN revealed that PSA levels, determined by a variety of ways, ProstaScint scan, and bone scan, were significant variables that had prognostic value in determining the likelihood of nodal disease, or distant disease in prostate cancer patients.

Treatment of childhood myoclonus with botulinum toxin type A

Because of inadequate response to or intolerable side effects of oral medication, nine patients with segmental, generalized, and focal myoclonus were treated with intramuscular botulinum toxin type A. All patients were evaluated with neuroimaging, routine and limb-monitored electroencephalography, electromyography, evoked potentials and appropriate biochemical studies. Patients were aged 2 to 22 years, with duration of myoclonus from 1 month to 10 years. Multiple medication trials included antiepileptic drugs, benzodiazepines, tryptophan, L-dopa/carbidopa, baclofen, and dantrolene. Patients were injected with botulinum toxin in their affected area with electromyographic guidance to affected muscles with different doses (8 to 20 units/kg), except two patients who were injected with 32 and 45 units/kg, respectively, at 4- to 8-month intervals. One patient did not complete botulinum toxin treatment because of subjective weakness, although there were virtually no side effects reported in patients completing therapy. Patients reported a dramatic reduction in painful myoclonus. In addition, patients exhibited improved functional skills, as demonstrated by markedly improved use of affected extremities and improvements in ambulation. One patient, who was nonambulatory prior to treatment, was able to walk afterward. Long-term benefits could be related to higher dosage used or negative feedback effect.

Follow-up evaluation of a phase II prostate cancer vaccine trial

BACKGROUND

A phase II trial, involving infusions of autologous dendritic cells (DC) and two human histocompatibility antigen (HLA-A2)-specific prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) peptides, was recently completed. Thirty percent of the participants, including subjects with hormone-refractory metastastic disease, and those with suspected local recurrence of prostate cancer, were identified as clinical responders. This report describes the follow-up evaluation of 19 responders in the two study groups.

METHODS

After conclusion of the study, study participants were subjected to follow-up evaluations at 6-8-week intervals. Each responder was reevaluated for response status, and duration of response was determined.

RESULTS

Subjects were observed for an average of 291 days (metastastic group, group A-2) and 557 days (local recurrence group, group B), which included the treatment and follow-up periods. The average duration of response was 149 days for group A-2, and 187 days for group B. A majority of responders (11/19; 58%) were still responsive at the end of the current follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The responses observed may be significant and relatively durable. This study suggests that DC-based cancer vaccines in the future may provide an additional therapy for advanced prostate cancer.

GM-CSF as a systemic adjuvant in a phase II prostate cancer vaccine trial

BACKGROUND

Recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF; Leukine [sargramostim], Immunex Corp., Seattle, WA) was administered to a subgroup of 44 patients in a phase II clinical trial for prostate cancer using DC pulsed with HLA-A2-specific prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) peptides. Our purpose was to determine if GM-CSF caused any enhancement of patients' immune responses, including enhancement of clinical response to the DC-peptide treatment. This report compares the clinical responses to DC-peptide infusions with and without systemic GM-CSF treatment.

METHODS

GM-CSF was administered by subcutaneous injection at a dose of 75 microg/m2/day for 7 days with each of six infusion cycles. Prefilled syringes were supplied to the patients for self-administration.

RESULTS

One complete and 8 partial responders were identified among 44 patients who received GM-CSF, as compared to 2 complete and 17 partial responders among 51 patients who did not receive GM-CSF. For patients who received GM-CSF and were tested by delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) skin test, 3 cases of improved immune response were identified, compared to 5 cases of improvement in patients who did not receive GM-CSF. The main GM-CSF side effects reported were local reactions at the site of injection, fatigue, pain, and fever. Most reported side effects were of mild severity, with some cases of moderate severity leading to discontinuation of GM-CSF.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest GM-CSF as employed in this trial did not detectably enhance clinical response to DC-peptide infusions, or significantly enhance the measured immune response.

Phase II prostate cancer vaccine trial: report of a study involving 37 patients with disease recurrence following primary treatment

BACKGROUND

A phase II trial was conducted to assess the efficacy of infusions of dendritic cells (DC) and two HLA-A2-specific prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) peptides (PSM-P1 and -P2). This report describes the evaluation of 37 subjects admitted with presumed local recurrence of prostate cancer after primary treatment failure.

METHODS

All subjects received six infusions of DC pulsed with PSM-P1 and -P2 at 6-week intervals. Clinical monitoring was conducted pre-, during, and post-phase II study. Data included: complete blood count, bone and total alkaline phosphatase, prostate markers, physical examination, performance status, bone scan, ProstaScint scan, and chest X-ray, as well as other assays to monitor cellular and humoral immune responses.

RESULTS

One complete and 10 partial responders were identified from this group based on National Prostate Cancer Project criteria, or on a 50% reduction of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), or on a significant resolution in lesions (biopsy-proven when possible) on ProstaScint scan.

CONCLUSIONS

About 30% of study participants in this group showed a positive response at the conclusion of the trial. This study suggests that DC-based cancer vaccines may provide an alternative therapy for prostate cancer patients whose primary treatment failed.

Infusion of dendritic cells pulsed with HLA-A2-specific prostate-specific membrane antigen peptides: a phase II prostate cancer vaccine trial involving patients with hormone-refractory metastatic disease

BACKGROUND

A phase II trial was conducted to assess the efficacy of infusions of dendritic cells (DC) and two HLA-A2-specific PSMA peptides (PSM-P1 and -P2). This report describes thirty three subjects with hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer without prior vaccine therapy history who were evaluated and reported as a group.

METHODS

All subjects received six infusions of DC pulsed with PSM-P1 and -P2 at six week intervals. Clinical monitoring was conducted pre-, during, and post- phase II study. Data collected include: complete blood count, bone and total alkaline phosphatase, prostate markers, physical examination, performance status, bone scan, ProstaScint scan, chest x-ray, as well as assays to monitor cellular immune responses.

RESULTS

Six partial and two complete responders were identified in the phase II study based on NPCP criteria, plus 50% reduction of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), or resolution in previously measurable lesions on ProstaScint scan.

CONCLUSIONS

Over 30% of study participants in this group showed a positive response at the conclusion of the trial. This study suggested that DC-based cancer vaccines may provide an alternative therapy for prostate cancer patients whose disease no longer responds to hormone therapy.

Evaluation of phase I/II clinical trials in prostate cancer with dendritic cells and PSMA peptides

BACKGROUND

A phase I trial involving patients with advanced prostate cancer was conducted to assess the safe administration of dendritic cells (DC) and HLA-A0201-specific prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) peptides (PSM-P1 or -P2). Thirty-three of the phase I participants were subsequently enrolled in a phase II trial, which involved six infusions of DC pulsed with PSM-P1 and -P2 peptides.

METHODS

Clinical monitoring was conducted up to 770 days from the start of the phase I study. Data collected included: complete blood count, bone and total alkaline phosphatase, prostate markers, physical examination, performance status, bone scan, ProstaScint scan, and chest X-ray, as well as assays to monitor cellular immune responses.

RESULTS

Nine partial responders were identified in the phase II study based on National Prostate Cancer Project (NPCP) criteria, plus 50% reduction of prostate-specific antigen. Four of the partial responders were also responders in the phase I study, with an average response duration of 225 days. Their combined average total response period was over 370 days. Five other responders were nonresponders in the phase I study. Their average partial response period was 196 days.

CONCLUSIONS

The responses observed in the phase I and II clinical trials were significant and of long duration. The partial-responder group included patients who continued to respond from phase I, as well as those who started to respond during the phase II trial.

Adenocarcinoma of the prostate: innovations in management

Adenocarcinoma of the prostate (CaP) in the Western world has become the most common noncutaneous human tumor. CaP is also the second most important cause of cancer deaths among the male population in the United States. Major progress was made in the past decade in better understanding this disease process, as well as in improved diagnostic accuracy. This improved diagnostic accuracy was due to wide application of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), use of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), and greater awareness among clinicians of CaP. The use of PSA in clinical practice has resulted in a sharp increase in the number of patients diagnosed with capsule-confined tumors. The optimal treatment for capsule-confined CaP is in the process of being defined. Radical prostatectomy in the United States is currently the most commonly applied treatment for younger patients. Excellent treatment results with a 10-year actuarial survival > 80% are readily obtainable in properly selected patients. Nerve-sparing procedures helped reduce the high incidence of impotence that occurs in patients after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Radiotherapy remains the other curative treatment method in the management of CaP patients, with long-term survival rates similar to those reported in surgical series. Due to the problem of frequent preoperative tumor understaging, a routine use of postoperative irradiation to the prostatic fossa produces an excellent (> 95%) incidence of local tumor control. Management of patients with metastatic disease has undergone a considerable evolution with the development of modern hormonal management and treatment with strontium-89 to control intractable bone pain. Newer treatment methods such as hyperthermia are currently being investigated. Major efforts are directed toward the reduction of short- and long-term treatment toxicity associated with surgery, radiotherapy, and hormonal management, thus improving patient quality of life.

[Hormone therapy before radical prostatectomy. Effects on surgical method and resection margins. Belgian Uro-Oncological Study Group (B.U.O.S.)]

127 patients with a clinical stage T2b and T3 prostate cancer were randomized in order to undergo either a radical prostatectomy alone or a radical prostatectomy after hormonal treatment (560 mg of estramustine phosphate daily for 6 weeks) in a prospective multi-center study. The clinical or radiological evaluation of an eventual downstaging being extremely difficult, the authors compared in the 2 groups the influence on the surgical act and the number of positive surgical margins at pathological examination of the resected specimen. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups concerning the surgery (duration of the procedure, blood transfusion, degree of difficulty). For clinical T2 prostate tumors the number of positive surgical margins was significantly lower in the group that had preoperative hormonal treatment. In the group with clinical T3 prostate cancer this difference was not found. The influence of positive margins on the later development of local or systemic recurrence and on survival still has to be awaited. At this moment one could conclude that only patients with a T2 prostate cancer benefit of a preoperative hormonal treatment.