1
|
Leite AMM, Bonfrate A, Da Fonseca A, Lansonneur P, Alapetite C, Mammar H, De Marzi L. Double scattering and pencil beam scanning Monte Carlo workflows for proton therapy retrospective studies on radiation-induced toxicities. Cancer Radiother 2023:S1278-3218(23)00070-7. [PMID: 37164897 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2023.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Revised: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Monte Carlo (MC) simulations can be used to accurately simulate dose and linear energy transfers (LET) distributions, thereby allowing for the calculation of the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of protons. We present hereby the validation and implementation of a workflow for the Monte Carlo modelling of the double scattered and pencil beam scanning proton beamlines at our institution. METHODS The TOPAS/Geant4 MC model of the clinical nozzle has been comprehensively validated against measurements. The validation also included a comparison between simulated clinical treatment plans for four representative patients and the clinical treatment planning system (TPS). Moreover, an in-house tool implemented in Python was tested to assess the variable RBE-weighted dose in proton plans, which was illustrated for a patient case with a developing radiation-induced toxicity. RESULTS The simulated range and modulation width closely matches the measurements. Gamma-indexes (3%/3mm 3D), which compare the TPS and MC computations, showed a passing rate superior to 98%. The calculated RBE-weighted dose presented a slight increase at the necrosis location, within the PTV margins. This indicates the need for reporting on the physical and biological effects of irradiation in high dose regions, especially at the healthy tissues and increased LET distributions location. CONCLUSION The results demonstrate that the Monte Carlo method can be used to independently validate a TPS calculation, and to estimate LET distributions. The features of the in-house tool can be used to correlate LET and RBE-weighted dose distributions with the incidence of radiation-induced toxicities following proton therapy treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A M M Leite
- Inserm U 1021- CNRS UMR 3347, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, 91898, Orsay, France; Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, centre universitaire, 91898 Orsay, France
| | - A Bonfrate
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, centre universitaire, 91898 Orsay, France
| | - A Da Fonseca
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, centre universitaire, 91898 Orsay, France
| | - P Lansonneur
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, centre universitaire, 91898 Orsay, France
| | - C Alapetite
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, centre universitaire, 91898 Orsay, France
| | - H Mammar
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, centre universitaire, 91898 Orsay, France
| | - L De Marzi
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, centre universitaire, 91898 Orsay, France; Inserm LITO, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, 91898 Orsay, France.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Leite AMM, Ronga MG, Giorgi M, Ristic Y, Perrot Y, Trompier F, Prezado Y, Créhange G, De Marzi L. Secondary neutron dose contribution from pencil beam scanning, scattered and spatially fractionated proton therapy. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66. [PMID: 34673555 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac3209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
The Orsay Proton therapy Center (ICPO) has a long history of intracranial radiotherapy using both double scattering (DS) and pencil beam scanning (PBS) techniques, and is actively investigating a promising modality of spatially fractionated radiotherapy using proton minibeams (pMBRT). This work provides a comprehensive comparison of the organ-specific secondary neutron dose due to each of these treatment modalities, assessed using Monte Carlo (MC) algorithms and measurements. A MC model of a universal nozzle was benchmarked by comparing the neutron ambient dose equivalent,H*(10), in the gantry room with measurements obtained using a WENDI-II counter. The secondary neutron dose was evaluated for clinically relevant intracranial treatments of patients of different ages, in which secondary neutron doses were scored in anthropomorphic phantoms merged with the patients' images. The MC calculatedH*(10) values showed a reasonable agreement with the measurements and followed the expected tendency, in which PBS yields the lowest dose, followed by pMBRT and DS. Our results for intracranial treatments show that pMBRT yielded a higher secondary neutron dose for organs closer to the target volume, while organs situated furthest from the target volume received a greater quantity of neutrons from the passive scattering beam line. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to compare MC secondary neutron dose estimates in clinical treatments between these various proton therapy modalities and to realistically quantify the secondary neutron dose contribution of clinical pMBRT treatments. The method established in this study will enable epidemiological studies of the long-term effects of intracranial treatments at ICPO, notably radiation-induced second malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A M M Leite
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre Universitaire, F-91898 Orsay, France.,Institut Curie, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, Inserm U 1021- CNRS UMR 3347, F-91898 Orsay, France
| | - M G Ronga
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre Universitaire, F-91898 Orsay, France
| | - M Giorgi
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre Universitaire, F-91898 Orsay, France
| | - Y Ristic
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Service de Dosimétrie, Laboratoire de Dosimétrie des Rayonnements Ionisants, F-92262 Fontenay-aux-Roses Cedex, France
| | - Y Perrot
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Service de Dosimétrie, Laboratoire de Dosimétrie des Rayonnements Ionisants, F-92262 Fontenay-aux-Roses Cedex, France
| | - F Trompier
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Service de Dosimétrie, Laboratoire de Dosimétrie des Rayonnements Ionisants, F-92262 Fontenay-aux-Roses Cedex, France
| | - Y Prezado
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, Inserm U 1021- CNRS UMR 3347, F-91898 Orsay, France
| | - G Créhange
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre Universitaire, F-91898 Orsay, France
| | - L De Marzi
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre Universitaire, F-91898 Orsay, France.,Institut Curie, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, Inserm LITO, F-91898 Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|