1
|
Deut U, Ronga MG, Bonfrate A, De Marzi L. Secondary radiation dose modeling in passive scattering and pencil beam scanning very high energy electron (VHEE) radiation therapy. Med Phys 2023. [PMID: 37227704 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Revised: 04/15/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Electrons with kinetic energy up to a few hundred MeV, also called very high energy electrons (VHEE), are currently considered a promising technique for the future of radiation therapy (RT) and in particular ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) therapy. However, the feasibility of a clinical application is still being debated and VHEE therapy remains an active area of research for which the optimal conformal technique is also yet to be determined. PURPOSE In this work, we will apply two existing formalisms based on analytical Gaussian multiple-Coulomb scattering theory and Monte Carlo (MC) simulations to study and compare the electron and bremsstrahlung photon dose distributions arising from two beam delivery systems (passive scattering with or without a collimator or active scanning). METHODS We therefore tested the application of analytical and MC models to VHEE beams and assessed their performance and parameterization in the energy range of 6-200 MeV. The optimized electron beam fluence, the bremsstrahlung, an estimation of central-axis and off-axis x-ray dose at the practical range and neutron contributions to the total dose, along with an extended parameterization for the photon dose model were developed, together with a comparison between double scattering (DS) and pencil beam scanning (PBS) techniques. MC simulations were performed with the TOPAS/Geant4 toolkit to verify the dose distributions predicted by the analytical calculations. RESULTS The results for the clinical energy range (between 6 and 20 MeV) as well as for higher energies (VHEE range between 20 and 200 MeV) and for two treatment field sizes (5 × 5 and 10 × 10 cm2 ) are reported, showing a reasonable agreement with MC simulations with mean differences below 2.1%. The relative contributions of photons generated in the medium or by the scattering system along the central-axis (up to 50% of the total dose) are also illustrated, along with their relative variations with electron energy. CONCLUSIONS The fast analytical models parametrized in this study allow an estimation of the amount of photons produced behind the practical range by a DS system with an accuracy lower than 3%, providing important information for the eventual design of a VHEE system. The results of this work could support future research on VHEE radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Umberto Deut
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Campus universitaire, Orsay, France
| | - Maria Grazia Ronga
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Campus universitaire, Orsay, France
- Thales Avionics, Vélizy-Villacoublay, France
| | - Anthony Bonfrate
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Campus universitaire, Orsay, France
| | - Ludovic De Marzi
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Campus universitaire, Orsay, France
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, INSERM LITO, Campus universitaire, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Palmieri L, Schenato L, Santagiustina M, Galtarossa A. Rayleigh-Based Distributed Optical Fiber Sensing. Sensors (Basel) 2022; 22:s22186811. [PMID: 36146159 PMCID: PMC9505392 DOI: 10.3390/s22186811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Revised: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
Distributed optical fiber sensing is a unique technology that offers unprecedented advantages and performance, especially in those experimental fields where requirements such as high spatial resolution, the large spatial extension of the monitored area, and the harshness of the environment limit the applicability of standard sensors. In this paper, we focus on one of the scattering mechanisms, which take place in fibers, upon which distributed sensing may rely, i.e., the Rayleigh scattering. One of the main advantages of Rayleigh scattering is its higher efficiency, which leads to higher SNR in the measurement; this enables measurements on long ranges, higher spatial resolution, and, most importantly, relatively high measurement rates. The first part of the paper describes a comprehensive theoretical model of Rayleigh scattering, accounting for both multimode propagation and double scattering. The second part reviews the main application of this class of sensors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Palmieri
- Department of Information Engineering, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy
- CNIT, National Inter-University Consortium for Telecommunications, 43124 Parma, Italy
| | - Luca Schenato
- CNIT, National Inter-University Consortium for Telecommunications, 43124 Parma, Italy
- Research Institute for Geo-Hydrological Protection, National Research Council, 35127 Padova, Italy
| | - Marco Santagiustina
- Department of Information Engineering, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy
- CNIT, National Inter-University Consortium for Telecommunications, 43124 Parma, Italy
| | - Andrea Galtarossa
- Department of Information Engineering, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy
- CNIT, National Inter-University Consortium for Telecommunications, 43124 Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Leite AMM, Ronga MG, Giorgi M, Ristic Y, Perrot Y, Trompier F, Prezado Y, Créhange G, De Marzi L. Secondary neutron dose contribution from pencil beam scanning, scattered and spatially fractionated proton therapy. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66. [PMID: 34673555 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac3209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
The Orsay Proton therapy Center (ICPO) has a long history of intracranial radiotherapy using both double scattering (DS) and pencil beam scanning (PBS) techniques, and is actively investigating a promising modality of spatially fractionated radiotherapy using proton minibeams (pMBRT). This work provides a comprehensive comparison of the organ-specific secondary neutron dose due to each of these treatment modalities, assessed using Monte Carlo (MC) algorithms and measurements. A MC model of a universal nozzle was benchmarked by comparing the neutron ambient dose equivalent,H*(10), in the gantry room with measurements obtained using a WENDI-II counter. The secondary neutron dose was evaluated for clinically relevant intracranial treatments of patients of different ages, in which secondary neutron doses were scored in anthropomorphic phantoms merged with the patients' images. The MC calculatedH*(10) values showed a reasonable agreement with the measurements and followed the expected tendency, in which PBS yields the lowest dose, followed by pMBRT and DS. Our results for intracranial treatments show that pMBRT yielded a higher secondary neutron dose for organs closer to the target volume, while organs situated furthest from the target volume received a greater quantity of neutrons from the passive scattering beam line. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to compare MC secondary neutron dose estimates in clinical treatments between these various proton therapy modalities and to realistically quantify the secondary neutron dose contribution of clinical pMBRT treatments. The method established in this study will enable epidemiological studies of the long-term effects of intracranial treatments at ICPO, notably radiation-induced second malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A M M Leite
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre Universitaire, F-91898 Orsay, France.,Institut Curie, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, Inserm U 1021- CNRS UMR 3347, F-91898 Orsay, France
| | - M G Ronga
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre Universitaire, F-91898 Orsay, France
| | - M Giorgi
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre Universitaire, F-91898 Orsay, France
| | - Y Ristic
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Service de Dosimétrie, Laboratoire de Dosimétrie des Rayonnements Ionisants, F-92262 Fontenay-aux-Roses Cedex, France
| | - Y Perrot
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Service de Dosimétrie, Laboratoire de Dosimétrie des Rayonnements Ionisants, F-92262 Fontenay-aux-Roses Cedex, France
| | - F Trompier
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Service de Dosimétrie, Laboratoire de Dosimétrie des Rayonnements Ionisants, F-92262 Fontenay-aux-Roses Cedex, France
| | - Y Prezado
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, Inserm U 1021- CNRS UMR 3347, F-91898 Orsay, France
| | - G Créhange
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre Universitaire, F-91898 Orsay, France
| | - L De Marzi
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre Universitaire, F-91898 Orsay, France.,Institut Curie, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, Inserm LITO, F-91898 Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chaouni S, Leduc A, Pouzoulet F, De Marzi L, Megnin-Chanet F, Stefan D, Habrand JL, Sichel F, Laurent C. Biological Effects of Scattered Versus Scanned Proton Beams on Normal Tissues in Total Body Irradiated Mice: Survival, Genotoxicity, Oxidative Stress and Inflammation. Antioxidants (Basel) 2020; 9:E1170. [PMID: 33255388 DOI: 10.3390/antiox9121170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Revised: 11/16/2020] [Accepted: 11/18/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Side effects of proton therapy are poorly studied. Moreover, the differences in the method of dose delivery on normal tissues are not taken into account when proton beams are scanned instead of being scattered. We proposed here to study the effects of both modalities of proton beam delivery on blood; skin; lung and heart in a murine model. In that purpose; C57BL/6 mice were total body irradiated by 190.6 MeV proton beams either by Double Scattering (DS) or by Pencil Beam Scanning (PBS) in the plateau phase before the Bragg Peak. Mouse survival was evaluated. Blood and organs were removed three months after irradiation. Biomarkers of genotoxicity; oxidative stress and inflammation were measured. Proton irradiation was shown to increase lymphocyte micronucleus frequency; lung superoxide dismutase activity; erythrocyte and skin glutathione peroxidase activity; erythrocyte catalase activity; lung; heart and skin oxidized glutathione level; erythrocyte and lung lipid peroxidation and erythrocyte protein carbonylation even 3 months post-irradiation. When comparing both methods of proton beam delivery; mouse survival was not different. However, PBS significantly increased lymphocyte micronucleus frequency; erythrocyte glutathione peroxidase activity and heart oxidized glutathione level compared to DS. These results point out the necessity to take into account the way of delivering dose in PT as it could influence late side effects.
Collapse
|
5
|
Fjæra LF, Indelicato DJ, Stokkevåg CH, Muren LP, Hsi WC, Ytre-Hauge KS. Implementation of a double scattering nozzle for Monte Carlo recalculation of proton plans with variable relative biological effectiveness. Phys Med Biol 2020; 65. [PMID: 33053524 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abc12d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
A constant relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 1.1 is currently used in clinical proton therapy. However, theRBEvaries with factors such as dose level, linear energy transfer (LET) and tissue type. MultipleRBEmodels have been developed to account for this biological variation. To enable recalculation of patients treated with double scattering (DS) proton therapy, includingLETand variableRBE, we implemented and commissioned a Monte Carlo (MC) model of a DS treatment nozzle. The main components from the IBA nozzle were implemented in the FLUKA MC code. We calibrated and verified the following entities to experimental measurements: range of pristine Bragg peaks (PBPs) and spread-out Bragg peaks (SOBPs), energy spread, lateral profiles, compensator range degradation, and absolute dose. We recalculated two patients with different field setups, comparing FLUKA vs. treatment planning system (TPS) dose, also obtainingLETand variableRBEdoses. We achieved good agreement between FLUKA and measurements. The range differences between FLUKA and measurements were for the PBPs within ±0.9 mm (83% ⩽ 0.5 mm), and for SOBPs ±1.6 mm (82% ⩽ 0.5 mm). The differences in modulation widths were below 5 mm (79% ⩽ 2 mm). The differences in the distal dose fall off (D80%-D20%) were below 0.5 mm for all PBPs and the lateral penumbras diverged from measurements by less than 1 mm. The mean dose difference (RBE= 1.1) in the target between the TPS and FLUKA were below 0.4% in a three-field plan and below 1.4% in a four-field plan. A dose increase of 9.9% and 7.2% occurred when using variableRBEfor the two patients, respectively. We presented a method to recalculate DS proton plans in the FLUKA MC code. The implementation was used to obtainLETand variableRBEdose and can be used for investigating variableRBEfor previously treated patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lars Fredrik Fjæra
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Daniel J Indelicato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, FL, United States of America
| | - Camilla H Stokkevåg
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Ludvig P Muren
- Department of Medical Physics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Wen C Hsi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, FL, United States of America
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Michaelidesová A, Vachelová J, Klementová J, Urban T, Pachnerová Brabcová K, Kaczor S, Falk M, Falková I, Depeš D, Vondráček V, Davídková M. In Vitro Comparison of Passive and Active Clinical Proton Beams. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:E5650. [PMID: 32781754 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21165650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Revised: 07/26/2020] [Accepted: 08/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Nowadays, the irradiation methodology in proton therapy is switching from the use of passively scattered beams to active pencil beams due to the possibility of more conformal dose distributions. The dose rates of active pencil beams are much higher than those of passive beams. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether there is any difference in the biological effectiveness of these passive and active irradiation modes. The beam qualities of double scattering and pencil beam scanning were measured dosimetrically and simulated using the Monte Carlo code. Using the medulloblastoma cell line DAOY, we performed an in vitro comparison of the two modes in two positions along the dose–deposition curve plateau and inside the Bragg peak. We followed the clonogenic cell survival, apoptosis, micronuclei, and γH2AX assays as biological endpoints. The Monte Carlo simulations did not reveal any difference between the beam qualities of the two modes. Furthermore, we did not observe any statistically significant difference between the two modes in the in vitro comparison of any of the examined biological endpoints. Our results do not show any biologically relevant differences related to the different dose rates of passive and active proton beams.
Collapse
|
7
|
Yuan J, Mansur D, Yao M, Biswas T, Zheng Y, Jesseph R, Jin JY, Machtay M. An Integrated Framework Based on Full Monte Carlo Simulations for Double-Scattering Proton Therapy. Int J Part Ther 2020; 6:31-41. [PMID: 31998819 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-19-00063.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2019] [Accepted: 07/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We developed an integrated framework that employs a full Monte Carlo (MC) model for treatment-plan simulations of a passive double-scattering proton system. MATERIALS AND METHODS We have previously validated a virtual machine source model for full MC proton-dose calculations by comparing the percentage of depth-dose curves, spread-out Bragg peaks, and lateral profiles against measured commissioning data. This study further expanded our previous work by developing an integrate framework that facilitates its clinical use. Specifically, we have (1) constructed patient-specific applicator and compensator numerically from the plan data and incorporated them into the beamline, (2) created the patient anatomy from the computed tomography image and established the transformation between patient and machine coordinate systems, and (3) developed a graphical user interface to ease the whole process from importing the treatment plan in the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine format to parallelization of the MC calculations. End-to-end tests were performed to validate the functionality, and 3 clinical cases were used to demonstrate clinical utility of the framework. RESULTS The end-to-end tests demonstrated that the framework functioned correctly for all tested functionality. Comparisons between the treatment planning system calculations and MC results in 3 clinical cases revealed large dose difference up to 17%, especially in the beam penumbra and near the end of beam range. The discrepancy likely originates from a variety of sources, such as the dose algorithms, modeling of the beamline, and the dose metric. The agreement for other regions was acceptable. CONCLUSION An integrated framework was developed for full MC simulations of double-scattering proton therapy. It can be a valuable tool for dose verification and plan evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiankui Yuan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - David Mansur
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Min Yao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Tithi Biswas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Yiran Zheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Rick Jesseph
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jian-Yue Jin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Mitchell Machtay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Su Z, Slopsema R, Flampouri S, Li Z. Impact of intrafraction prostate motion on clinical target coverage in proton therapy: A simulation study of dosimetric differences in two delivery techniques. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2019; 20:67-73. [PMID: 31478341 PMCID: PMC6806470 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2019] [Revised: 08/09/2019] [Accepted: 08/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To investigate the dosimetric impact of prostate intrafraction motion on proton double‐scattering (DS) and uniform scanning (US) treatments using electromagnetic transponder‐based prostate tracking data in simulated treatment deliveries. Methods In proton DS delivery, the spread‐out Bragg peak (SOBP) is created almost instantaneously by the constant rotation of the range modulator. US, however, delivers each entire energy layer of the SOBP sequentially from distal to proximal direction in time, which can interplay with prostate intrafraction motion. This spatiotemporal interplay during proton treatment was simulated to evaluate its dosimetric impact. Prostate clinical target volume (CTV) dose was obtained by moving CTV through dose matrices of the energy layers according to prostate‐motion traces. Fourteen prostate intrafraction motion traces of each of 17 prostate patients were used in the simulated treatment deliveries. Both single fraction dose‐volume histograms (DVHs) and fraction‐cumulative DVHs were obtained for both 2 Gy per fraction and 7.25 Gy per fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Results The simulation results indicated that CTV dose degradation depends on the magnitude and direction of prostate intrafraction motion and is patient specific. For some individual fractions, prescription dose coverage decreased in both US and DS treatments, and hot and cold spots inside the CTV were observed in the US results. However, fraction‐cumulative CTV dose coverage showed much reduced dose degradation for both DS and US treatments for both 2 Gy per fraction and SBRT simulations. Conclusions This study indicated that CTV dose inhomogeneity may exist for some patients with severe prostate intrafraction motion during US treatments. However, there are no statistically significant dose differences between DS and US treatment simulations. Cumulative dose of multiple‐fractions significantly reduced dose uncertainties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhong Su
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, and University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Roelf Slopsema
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, and University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Stella Flampouri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, and University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Zuofeng Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, and University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yuan J, Ellis R, Machtay M. Technical Note: An approach to building a Monte Carlo simulation model for a double scattering proton beam system. Med Phys 2018; 45:2660-2666. [PMID: 29603753 DOI: 10.1002/mp.12895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2018] [Revised: 03/09/2018] [Accepted: 03/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to demonstrate and develop a Monte Carlo (MC) simulation model for a passive double scattering compact proton therapy system based on limited information of the mechanical components. METHOD We built a virtual machine source model (VMSM) which included a detailed definition of each beam-modifying component in the nozzle. Conceptually, it is similar to the conventional virtual analytical source model (VASM), except that the numerical machine nozzle or beamline is constructed in the VMSM, whereas in the VASM analytical parameters characterizing the energy spectrum and source fluence distribution are sought. All major beam shaping components were included in the VMSM and the model simulates interactions of the beam with a rotating range modulation wheel (RMW) combined with the beam current modulation. The RMWs, the first and second scatterer in the system were generated and tuned to reproduce measurement data as closely as possible. To validate the model, we compared the percent depth dose curves, spread out Bragg peaks (SOBPs) and lateral profiles against measured commissioning beam data. RESULTS The agreement of beam range between the MC calculation and measurement was within 1 mm for all beam options. The distal-falloff length was in good agreement as well (<1 mm for the large and deep groups, <1.5 mm for the small group). Agreement to within 2.5 mm of measured SOBP widths was obtained for all MC calculations. For lateral profiles, differences were found to be less than 2 mm. CONCLUSIONS We demonstrated that with limited geometrical information it is possible to build an acceptable source model for MC simulations of a passive double scattering compact proton therapy system. The agreement between the measurements and the MC model provides validation for use of the model for further studies of the dosimetric effects in patient treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiankui Yuan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, 44106, OH, USA
| | - Rodney Ellis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, 44106, OH, USA
| | - Mitchell Machtay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, 44106, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ferguson S, Chen Y, Ferreira C, Islam M, Keeling VP, Lau A, Ahmad S, Jin H. Comparability of three output prediction models for a compact passively double-scattered proton therapy system. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2017; 18:108-117. [PMID: 28422406 PMCID: PMC5689858 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2016] [Revised: 02/16/2017] [Accepted: 02/21/2017] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate comparability of three output prediction models for a compact double‐scattered proton therapy system. Two published output prediction models are commissioned for our Mevion S250 proton therapy system. Model A is a correction‐based model (Sahoo et al., Med Phys, 2008;35(11):5088–5097) and model B is an analytical model which employs a function of r = (R’‐M’)/M’ (Kooy et al., Phys Med Biol, 2005;50:5487–5456) where R’ is defined as depth of distal 100% dose with straggling and M’ is the width between distal 100% dose and proximal 100% dose with straggling instead of the theoretical definition due to more accurate output prediction. The r is converted to ((R‐0.31)‐0.81 × M)/(0.81 × M) with the vendor definition of R (distal 90% dose) and M (distal 90% dose‐to‐proximal 95% dose), where R’ = R‐0.31 (g cm−2) and M’ = 0.81 × M (g cm−2). In addition, a quartic polynomial fit model (model C) mathematically converted from model B is studied. The outputs of 272 sets of R and M covering the 24 double scattering options are measured. Each model's predicted output is compared to the measured output. For the total dataset, the percent difference between predicted (P) and measured (M) outputs ((P‐M)/M × 100%) were within ±3% using the three different models. The average differences (±standard deviation) were −0.13 ± 0.94%, −0.13 ± 1.20%, and −0.22 ± 1.11% for models A, B, and C, respectively. The p‐values of the t‐test were 0.912 (model A vs. B), 0.061 (model A vs. C), and 0.136 (model B vs. C). For all the options, all three models have clinically acceptable predictions. The differences between models A, B, and C are statistically insignificant; however, model A generally has the potential to more accurately predict the output if a larger dataset for commissioning is used. It is concluded that the models can be comparably used for the compact proton therapy system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sven Ferguson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Yong Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Clara Ferreira
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Mohammad Islam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Baylor Scott & White, Temple, TX, USA
| | - Vance P Keeling
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CARTI, Inc., Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Andy Lau
- Oklahoma Cancer Specialists and Research Institute, Tulsa, OK, USA
| | - Salahuddin Ahmad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Hosang Jin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zhang K, Chen H, Li P, Bo X, Li X, Zeng Z, Xu H. Marriage Strategy of Structure and Composition Designs for Intensifying Ultrasound & MR & CT Trimodal Contrast Imaging. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2015; 7:18590-18599. [PMID: 26245739 DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b04999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
Despite great efforts having been devoted to the design of multimodal imaging probe, almost all design principles of nanotheranostic agents subordinate to simple assemblies of building blocks, resulting in complex preparation process and discounted ability, that is, 1 + 1 < 2. In this report, a novel design strategy, marriage of structure design and composition design that can maximize imaging ability of each building block, ultimately achieving 1 + 1 ≥ 2, has been established. Moreover, a high-efficient ultrasound (US) & MR & CT trimodal contrast agent acts as model to instantiate this design strategy, wherein nanoparticles-induced nonlinear scattering and rattle-type structure-induced double scattering enhancing US imaging, and uniform distribution of Mn(2+) paramagentic centers and "core-satellite" structure of Au atoms favoring enhanced MR imaging and CT imaging, respectively have been validated, achieving optimization of structure design. Importantly, the selected components, silica, Au and MnO are endowed with excellent biocompatibility, displaying the marriage strategy of composition design with aforementioned structure optimization. In in vivo evaluations, such a biocompatible trimodal probe is demonstrated of excellent performance in intensifying CT, MR and US imaging in vivo, especially after positively charged modification by PEI promoting more probes retained in tumor. More importantly, as a universal design strategy, the involved principles in constructing such a US&MR&CT trimodal imaging probe promise great potentials in guiding designs of other materials-based multimodal imaging probe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kun Zhang
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine , 301 Yan-chang-zhong Road, Shanghai, 200072, P. R. China
- Thyroid Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, 301
Yan-chang-zhong Road, Shanghai, 200072, P. R. China
- State Key Laboratory of High Performance Ceramics and Superfine
Microstructures, Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, Chinese Academy of
Sciences , 1295 Ding-Xi Road, Shanghai 200050, P. R. China
| | - Hangrong Chen
- State Key Laboratory of High Performance Ceramics and Superfine
Microstructures, Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, Chinese Academy of
Sciences , 1295 Ding-Xi Road, Shanghai 200050, P. R. China
| | - Pei Li
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine , 301 Yan-chang-zhong Road, Shanghai, 200072, P. R. China
- Thyroid Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, 301
Yan-chang-zhong Road, Shanghai, 200072, P. R. China
| | - Xiaowan Bo
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine , 301 Yan-chang-zhong Road, Shanghai, 200072, P. R. China
- Thyroid Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, 301
Yan-chang-zhong Road, Shanghai, 200072, P. R. China
| | - Xiaolong Li
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine , 301 Yan-chang-zhong Road, Shanghai, 200072, P. R. China
- Thyroid Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, 301
Yan-chang-zhong Road, Shanghai, 200072, P. R. China
| | - Zeng Zeng
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine , 301 Yan-chang-zhong Road, Shanghai, 200072, P. R. China
- Thyroid Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, 301
Yan-chang-zhong Road, Shanghai, 200072, P. R. China
| | - Huixiong Xu
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine , 301 Yan-chang-zhong Road, Shanghai, 200072, P. R. China
- Thyroid Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, 301
Yan-chang-zhong Road, Shanghai, 200072, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|