Can regulatory T cells improve outcomes of sensitised patients after HLA-Ab incompatible renal transplantation: study protocol for the Phase IIa GAMECHANgER-1 trial

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation is the gold-standard treatment for patients with kidney failure. However, one-third of patients awaiting a kidney transplant are highly sensitized to human leukocyte antigens (HLA), resulting in an increased waiting time for a suitable kidney, more acute and chronic rejection, and a shorter graft survival compared to non-highly sensitised patients. Current standard immunosuppression protocols do not adequately suppress memory responses, and so alternative strategies are needed. Autologous polyclonally expanded regulatory T cells (Tregs) have been demonstrated to be safe in transplant settings and could be a potential alternative to modulate memory immune alloresponses.

METHODS

The aim of this trial is to determine whether adoptive transfer of autologous Tregs into HLA sensitised patients can suppress memory T and B cell responses against specific HLA antigens. This is a two-part, multi-centre, prospective clinical trial, comprising an observational phase (Part 1) aiming to identify patients with unregulated cellular memory responses to HLA (Pure HLA Proteins) followed by an interventional phase (Part 2). The first 9 patients identified as being eligible in Part 1 will undergo baseline immune monitoring for 2 months to inform statistical analysis of the primary endpoint. Part 2 is an adaptive, open labelled trial based on Simon's two-stage design, with 21 patients receiving Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP)-grade polyclonally expanded Tregs to a dose of 5-10 × 106 cells/kg body weight. The primary EP is suppression of in vitro memory responses for 2 months post-infusion. 12 patients will receive treatment in stage 1 of Part 2, and 9 patients will receive treatment in stage 2 of Part 2 if ≥ 50% patients pass the primary EP in stage 1.

DISCUSSION

This is a prospective study aiming to identify patients with unregulated cellular memory responses to Pure HLA Proteins and determine baseline variation in these patterns of response. Part 2 will be an adaptive phase IIa clinical trial with 21 patients receiving a single infusion of GMP-grade polyclonally expanded Tregs in two stages. It remains to be demonstrated that modulating memory alloresponses clinically using Treg therapy is achievable.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

EudraCT Number: 2021-001,664-23. REC Number: 21/SC/0253. Trial registration number ISRCTN14582152.

Immune Exhaustion and Transplantation

Exhaustion of lymphocyte function through chronic exposure to a high load of foreign antigen is well established for chronic viral infection and antitumor immunity and has been found to be associated with a distinct molecular program and characteristic cell surface phenotype. Although exhaustion has most commonly been studied in the context of CD8 viral responses, recent studies indicate that chronic antigen exposure may affect B cells, NK cells and CD4 T cells in a parallel manner. Limited information is available regarding the extent of lymphocyte exhaustion development in the transplant setting and its impact on anti-graft alloreactivity. By analogy to the persistence of a foreign virus, the large mass of alloantigen presented by an allograft in chronic residence could provide an ideal setting for exhausting donor-reactive T cells. The extent of T cell exhaustion occurring with various allografts, the kinetics of its development, whether exhaustion is influenced positively or negatively by different immunosuppressants, and the impact of exhaustion on graft survival and tolerance development remains a fertile area for investigation. Harnessing or encouraging the natural processes of exhaustion may provide a novel means to promote graft survival and transplantation tolerance.

Natural Killer Cells and Liver Transplantation: Orchestrators of Rejection or Tolerance?

Natural killer (NK) cells are highly heterogeneous innate lymphocytes with a diverse repertoire of phenotypes and functions. Their role in organ transplantation has been poorly defined due to conflicting clinical and experimental data. There is evidence that NK cells can contribute to graft rejection and also to tolerance induction. In most solid organ transplantation settings, the role of NK cells is only considered from the perspective of the recipient immune system. In contrast to other organs, the liver contains major resident populations of immune cells, particularly enriched with innate lymphocytes such as NK cells, NKT cells, and gamma-delta T cells. Liver transplantation therefore results in a unique meeting of donor and recipient immune systems. The unusual immune repertoire and tolerogenic environment of the liver may explain why this potentially inflammatory "meeting" often results in attenuated immune responses and reduced requirement for immunosuppression. Recent trials of immunosuppression withdrawal in liver transplant patients have identified NK cell features as possible predictors of tolerance. Here we propose that hepatic NK cells play a key role in the induction of tolerance post-liver transplant and examine potential mechanisms by which these cells influence liver transplant outcome.

How long should initiation of calcineurin inhibitors be delayed to protect renal function in liver transplantation?

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Delayed introduction of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) in liver transplantation (OLT) seeks to protect renal function, although the optimal length of the delay is not well established. The aim of this study was to analyze the effects on renal function of CNI initiation on different days after OLT.

METHODS

We reviewed the charts of 260 OLT recipients. Group D1-a (n = 36) underwent the standard initial immunosuppression at our center: namely, CNI introduction on day 1 with further daily administration to achieve target levels of 8 to 15 ng/mL for tacrolimus or 150 to 300 ng/mL for cyclosporine. Due to renal concerns, 126 patients (group D1-b) had CNI introduced on day 1 either not daily or at doses to achieve less than the target on at least two occasions. In 43 patients (group D2), CNI were introduced on day 2 in 23 on day 3 (group D3), in 12 on day 4 (group D4), and at least at day 5 in 20 others (group D5). In periods without CNI treatment, patients received mycophenolate mofetil. Steroids were administered to all patients. The study period included the first 3 months post-OLT. Renal function was estimated as creatinine clearance (CrCl) using the Cockcroft-Gault equation.

RESULTS

Changes in CrCl from pre-OLT to month 3 were -19% ± 28% in group D1-a; -27% ± 19% in group D1-b; -29% ± 19% in group D2; -23% ± 26% in group D3; -4% ± 38% in group D4, and +4% ± 33% in group D5 (P < .05 vs groups D1-a, D1-b, D2, and D3). On multivariate analysis, CNI introduction at day ≥ 5 was protective for kidneys when adjusted for other variables that potentially influence renal function.

CONCLUSION

CNI should be introduced at day 5 after OLT to protect renal function.

Comparative transcriptional and phenotypic peripheral blood analysis of kidney recipients under cyclosporin A or sirolimus monotherapy

Due to its low level of nephrotoxicity and capacity to harness tolerogenic pathways, sirolimus (SRL) has been proposed as an alternative to calcineurin inhibitors in transplantation. The exact mechanisms underlying its unique immunosuppressive profile in humans, however, are still not well understood. In the current study, we aimed to depict the in vivo effects of SRL in comparison with cyclosporin A (CSA) by employing gene expression profiling and multiparameter flow cytometry on blood cells collected from stable kidney recipients under immunosuppressant monotherapy. SRL recipients displayed an increased frequency of CD4 + CD25highFoxp3 + T cells. However, this was accompanied by an increased number of effector memory T cells and by enrichment in NFkB-related pro-inflammatory expression pathways and monocyte and NK cell lineage-specific transcripts. Furthermore, measurement of a transcriptional signature characteristic of operationally tolerant kidney recipients failed to detect differences between SRL and CSA-treated recipients. In conclusion, we show here that the blood transcriptional profile induced by SRL monotherapy in vivo does not resemble that of operationally tolerant recipients and is dominated by innate immune cells and NFkB-related pro-inflammatory events. These data provide novel insights on the complex effects of SLR on the immune system in clinical transplantation.

Induction of tolerance in solid organ transplantation: the rationale to develop clinical protocols in liver transplantation

Minimization or withdrawal of immunosuppressive treatments after organ transplantation represents a major objective for improving quality of life and long-term survival of grafted patients. Such a goal may be reached under some clinical conditions, particularly in liver transplantation, making these patients good candidates for tolerance trials. In this context in liver transplantation, the central questions are (1) how to promote the natural propensity of the liver graft to be accepted, (2) which type of immunosuppressive drug should be used for induction and maintenance, and (3) which biomarkers could be used to discriminate tolerant patients from those requiring long-term immunosuppression. Induction therapies using aggressive T-cell-depleting agents may favor graft acceptance. However, persistent and/or rapidly reemerging cell lines, such as memory-type cells or CD8(+) T cells, could represent a significant barrier for induction of tolerance. The type of maintenance drugs also remains questionable. Calcineurin inhibitors may be eventually deleterious in the context of tolerance protocols, through inhibitory effects on regulatory T cells, that are not observed with rapamycin. In conclusion, significant efforts must be made to achieve reliable strategies for immunosuppression minimization or withdrawal after organ transplantation into the clinics.

An appraisal of tolerance in liver transplantation

Human liver allografts have a lower susceptibility to rejection than other organs. In addition, in some liver transplant recipients immunosuppressive drugs can be completely withdrawn, and these patients are considered as 'operationally' tolerant. Careful scrutiny of accumulated clinical experience indicates that elective immunosuppressive drug weaning is feasible in almost 20% of selected liver transplant recipients. This is associated with an incidence of 12% to 76% of acute cellular rejection, but these episodes are commonly mild and often resolve by return to baseline immunosuppression (IS), many times without the need to administer steroid boluses. Study of tolerance in liver transplantation (LT) has been hampered by confusion regarding the definitions of rejection and tolerance, and by the absence of prospective studies correlating results of immune monitoring assays and clinical outcome. Thus, we lack a clinically validated treatment-stopping rule capable of predicting the success of IS withdrawal and this procedure has to be performed on a 'trial and error' basis. The search for an accurate means to identify allograft tolerance among immunosuppressed recipients should become a priority in LT research. This information would provide a biological basis for guiding IS withdrawal protocols and for the implementation of tolerance-promoting strategies in LT.