Intracellular IFN-γ and IL-2 expression monitoring as surrogate markers of the risk of acute rejection and personal drug response in de novo liver transplant recipients

Biomarker monitoring is needed in transplantation to reflect individual response to immunosuppressive drugs and graft outcome. We evaluated intracellular expression and soluble production of interferon-(IFN)-γ and interleukin-(IL)-2 as predictive biomarkers of acute rejection (AR) and personal drug response. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic profiles were determined in 47 de novo liver recipients treated with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and prednisone. Of the 47 patients, AR occurred in nine. There were no differences in drug concentrations between rejectors and non-rejectors. A pre-transplantation cut-off value of 55.80% for %CD8(+)-IFN-γ(+) identified patients at high risk of AR with a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 82%. In the first week post-transplantation, patients with a % inhibition for soluble IFN-γ, %CD8(+)-IFN-γ(+) and %CD8(+)-IL2(+) lower than 40% developed AR, showing low susceptibility to immunosuppressive drugs. Therefore, effector-T-cell response monitoring may help physicians to identify personal response to treatment and patients at high risk of AR.

How long should initiation of calcineurin inhibitors be delayed to protect renal function in liver transplantation?

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Delayed introduction of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) in liver transplantation (OLT) seeks to protect renal function, although the optimal length of the delay is not well established. The aim of this study was to analyze the effects on renal function of CNI initiation on different days after OLT.

METHODS

We reviewed the charts of 260 OLT recipients. Group D1-a (n = 36) underwent the standard initial immunosuppression at our center: namely, CNI introduction on day 1 with further daily administration to achieve target levels of 8 to 15 ng/mL for tacrolimus or 150 to 300 ng/mL for cyclosporine. Due to renal concerns, 126 patients (group D1-b) had CNI introduced on day 1 either not daily or at doses to achieve less than the target on at least two occasions. In 43 patients (group D2), CNI were introduced on day 2 in 23 on day 3 (group D3), in 12 on day 4 (group D4), and at least at day 5 in 20 others (group D5). In periods without CNI treatment, patients received mycophenolate mofetil. Steroids were administered to all patients. The study period included the first 3 months post-OLT. Renal function was estimated as creatinine clearance (CrCl) using the Cockcroft-Gault equation.

RESULTS

Changes in CrCl from pre-OLT to month 3 were -19% ± 28% in group D1-a; -27% ± 19% in group D1-b; -29% ± 19% in group D2; -23% ± 26% in group D3; -4% ± 38% in group D4, and +4% ± 33% in group D5 (P < .05 vs groups D1-a, D1-b, D2, and D3). On multivariate analysis, CNI introduction at day ≥ 5 was protective for kidneys when adjusted for other variables that potentially influence renal function.

CONCLUSION

CNI should be introduced at day 5 after OLT to protect renal function.