Does Loosening the Inclusion Criteria of the CROSS Trial Impact Outcomes in the Curative-Intent Trimodality Treatment of Oesophageal and Gastroesophageal Cancer Patients?

AIM

To determine the efficacy of preoperative chemoradiotherapy as per the CROSS protocol for oesophageal/gastroesophageal junction cancer (OEGEJC), when expanded to patients outside of the inclusion/exclusion criteria defined in the original clinical trial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were collected retrospectively on 229 OEGEJC patients referred for curative-intent preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Outcomes including pathological complete response (pCR), overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of patients who met CROSS inclusion criteria (MIC) versus those who failed to meet criteria (FMIC) were determined.

RESULTS

In total, 42.8% of patients MIC, whereas 57.2% FMIC; 16.6% of patients did not complete definitive surgery. The MIC cohort had higher rates of pCR, when compared with the FMIC cohort (33.3% versus 20.6%, P = 0.039). The MIC cohort had a better RFS, cancer-specific survival and OS compared with the FMIC cohort (P = 0.006, P = 0.004 and P = 0.009, respectively). Age >75 years and pretreatment weight loss >10% were not associated with a poorer RFS (P = 0.541 and 0.458, respectively). Compared with stage I-III patients, stage IVa was associated with a poorer RFS (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.158; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.339-3.480, P = 0.001). Tumours >8 cm in length or >5 cm in width had a trend towards worse RFS (HR = 2.060; 95% CI = 0.993-4.274, P = 0.052).

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that the robust requirements of the CROSS trial may limit treatment for patients with potentially curable OEGEJC and can be adapted to include patients with a good performance status who are older than 75 years or have >10% pretreatment weight loss. However, the inclusion of patients with celiac nodal metastases or tumours >8 cm in length or >5 cm in width may be associated with poor outcomes.

Adherence to treatment guidelines in stage II/III rectal cancer in Alberta, Canada

AIMS

Evidence suggests that pre- and/or postoperative treatment benefits patients with stage II/III rectal cancer. This study aimed to quantify treatment patterns and adherence to treatment guidelines, and to identify barriers to having a consultation with an oncologist and barriers to receiving treatment in stage II/III rectal cancer, in a publicly funded medical care system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with surgically treated stage II/III rectal adenocarcinoma, diagnosed from 2002 to 2005 in Alberta, a Canadian province with a population of 3 million, were included. Demographic and treatment information from the Alberta Cancer Registry were linked to data from electronic medical records, hospital discharge data and the 2001 Canadian Census. The study outcomes were 'not having an oncologist consultation' and 'not receiving guideline-based treatment'. The relative risks of the two outcomes in association with patient characteristics were estimated using multivariable log-binomial regression.

RESULTS

Of a total of 910 surgically treated stage II/III rectal adenocarcinoma patients, 748 (82%) had a consultation with an oncologist and 414 (45.5%) received treatment. Pre-/post-surgical treatment modalities and timing varied; 96 (10.5%) received neoadjuvant treatment only, 389 (42.7%) received adjuvant treatment only, 119 (13.1%) received both, and 306 (33.6%) had surgery alone. Factors related to not having a consultation with an oncologist included older age, co-morbidities, cancer stage II and region of residence. Older age was the most significantly associated factor with not receiving treatment (relative risk=2.23; 95% confidence interval: 1.89, 2.64).

CONCLUSIONS

Disparities exist in the receipt of treatment in stage II/III rectal cancer. Factors such as age, region of residence and stage should not be barriers to consulting an oncologist to discuss or receive treatment. The reasons for these disparities need to be identified and addressed.

A prospective pharmacogenetic study of thymidylate synthase (TS) polymorphisms in high risk stage II or stage III colon cancer patients treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV)

13018

Background: Retrospective studies suggest TS polymorphisms predict toxicity from TS inhibitors as well as therapeutic response. The TS promoter has a variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) polymorphism containing putative E-box binding sites that bind upstream stimulatory factor (USF) -1 and -2. One E-box binding site exists in TSER*2 and 2 binding sites exist in TSER*3. A single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) at position 12 (G→C) in TSER*3’s 2nd repeat abolishes binding of USF-1/2. Combined effects of VNTR and SNP means individuals may have 2, 3 or 4 enhancer regions. We hypothesized that decreased enhancer numbers predicts for patients at risk for grade ≥3 mucositis, diarrhea, neutropenia, and overall toxicity and performed a prospective pharmacogenetic study of TS polymorphisms in adjuvant colon cancer patients treated with 5-FU/LV. Methods: High risk Stage II or Stage III colon cancer patients treated with 5FU/LV (425 mg/m2/ 20 mg/m2) daily for 5 days every 4 weeks had blood drawn for genotyping prior to starting therapy. Patients were assessed for toxicity using NCI CTC 2.0 in cycle 1. Three year disease-free survival will also be assessed. Results: 103 patients were enrolled and genotyped with 95 evaluable for toxicity. Patient characteristics: median age 61yrs (36–79): M 52%/F 48%; Stage III 77%, Stage II 23%. Frequency of genotypes containing 2 enhancers (TSER*2/ TSER*2, TSER*2 / TSER*3C, TSER*3C/ TSER*3C), 3 enhancers (TSER*2/ TSER*3G, TSER*3C/ TSER*3G) and 4 enhancers (TSER*3G/ TSER*3G) was 0.64, 0.31, and 0.05 respectively. No significant difference was seen in overall toxicity, mucositis, diarrhea and neutropenia based on TS polymorphism genotypes. Frequency of recurrence in 2 enhancer patients was 13% versus 26% in 3/4 enhancer patients but this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.16). Conclusions: This prospective study does not confirm previously published retrospective studies suggesting that TS VNTR and SNP predict toxicity from TS inhibitors in patients treated with 5-fluorouracil for colon cancer. There is a trend for prediction of recurrence which requires further follow-up.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Uridine glucuronosyltransferase 2B7 polymorphisms and epirubicin pharmacokinetics

13071

Background: Epirubicin (epi) is a widely used anthracycline for the treatment of breast cancer. In contrast to its optical isomer doxorubicin, epi is predominantly glucuronidated by uridine glucuronosyltransferase 2B7 (UGT2B7). UGT2B7 has a T to C polymorphism at position -161 in the enhancer region which correlated with efficacy of morphine glucuronidation (Sawyer et al. Clin Pharmcol Ther 2003). Methods: We performed a prospective pharmacogenetic study of FEC100 (5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, Epi 100 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2) given every 3 wks in early stage breast cancer pts. Drug levels were drawn at 1 and 24 hrs. We have determined levels of epi, epi-glucuronide (epiG), epirubicinol (epiol), and epiol-glucuronide (epiolG) in 78 of the 120 pts. The levels of epi and its metabolites were measured using an HPLC with fluorescence detection using the method of Fogli et al with modifications. Patient characteristics-median (range): age 50 (28 - 67), sex 77 F/ 1 M, baseline AST 22 U/L (13–66), ALT 20 U/L (5–90), bilirubin 7 umol/L (2–24), creatinine 73 umol/L (51–126). Results: 14 pts were TT homozygotes, 45 were CT heterozygotes, and 19 were CC homozygotes. Concentrations (ng/ml, median (range)) of epi, epiG, epiol, and epiolG at 1 hr respectively were 91 (39–481), 280 (0–981) 76 (14–212) 76 (0–276). There was no relationship between epiG concentration and genotype: 315 (median) TT, 263 CT, 288 CC. Patients with a TT genotype had a lower epiol concentrations (median, ng/ml) at 24 hr: 12 TT, 23 CT, 25 CC; p = 0.04. Conclusions: This analysis shows a relationship between UGT2B7 genotype and epi pharmacokinetics. We are completing analysis of all 120 samples and plan to perform a formal NONMEM analysis.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Integration of palliative care with alternative medicine in patients who have refused curative cancer therapy: a report of two cases

This article describes two young, potentially curable patients who chose a course of treatment that ultimately resulted in death. Their choice was in part influenced by the prospect of the disfiguring surgery that would have been required for cure. In the first patient this would have meant massive head and neck surgery, in the second, a radical hysterectomy that would have resulted in surgical menopause. The availability of practitioners who promised an easier cure was also a factor in swaying the first patient away from truly curative therapy. Denial also played a role in both of these patients' decisions. Part of their denial may have been exacerbated by the fact that both of their cancers have as risk factors behaviors that the patients may have considered inconsistent with their value system. In the first type of cancer, alcohol and chewing tobacco are major risk factors (11), neither of which would have been acceptable to the patient's family. In the second type, multiple sexual partners are a major risk for cervical cancer (12), a behavior which is inconsistent with the teachings of the patient's fundamentalist Christian beliefs. The approach that we have described--expressions of respect for the patient's belief system combined with the nonconfrontational offering of treatments with immediate symptomatic benefit--resulted in the development of an effective working relationship between patient, family, and palliative care team.