1
|
Kelly F, Chan E, Benson A, Masoumi S, Perry E, Taubman K, Sutherland T, Ong G, Guerrieri M, Chao MWT, Wong LM, Ng M. Location of Local Recurrences Post-Prostatectomy Detected by 18F-DCPFyL and Implications for Salvage Radiotherapy Target Volumes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:e399-e400. [PMID: 37785331 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.1531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) The use of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET scans have improved detection of recurrent prostate cancer for biochemical failure post-prostatectomy. The primary aim of this study is to assess the location of local recurrences for PSMA PET positive disease post-prostatectomy relative to anatomical landmarks and to inform salvage radiotherapy contouring guidelines. MATERIALS/METHODS This is a retrospective study of patients who underwent a staging PSMA PET-CT scan with 18F-DCFPyL tracer. Eligible patients included men with biochemical recurrence (PSA >0.2ng/mL) post-prostatectomy for prostate adenocarcinoma. PSMA positive local disease (GTV) was marked on the CT scan of the PSMA PET/CT, using the PSMA PET scan fused as the secondary dataset. Reference structures were contoured to compare the positional relationship to the GTV local recurrence. Centroids of each GTV position were measured to the closest border of the reference structures and distance measured. RESULTS Forty-five patients had a local recurrence on PSMA PET, 28/45 with prostate bed recurrence and 17/45 with seminal vesicle bed recurrence. The median age was 72.7 years, median pre-treatment PSA 0.515 ng/ml (0.2-11.1), pT2 in 37.8% and pT3 in 62.2, ISUP G2-3 was 66.7%, ISUP 4-5 29.6%, 67% ECE, 15.4% SV involvement and 40% positive margin. For prostate bed recurrences, 93.6% of GTVs were within 15mm from the inferior border of pubic symphysis (median 3.3mm [-9.8-15.4]), 83.9% within 10mm from the VUA (median 3.3mm [-17.4-15.9]), and 80.6% were greater than 10mm from the most superior slice of the penile bulb (median 16.4mm [1-29.5]). Laterally, 83.9% of recurrences were within 10mm of midline and 41.9% within 5mm (median 3.3mm [-13.56-11.59]) and all were contained within levator, 35.5% within 5mm (median 7.7 [1-22.6]) of the medial muscle border. 29.0% were within 5mm from the anterior edge of the rectal wall (median -7mm [-32.3-0.5]). Seminal vesicle bed recurrences were within 17.5mm of upper border of pubic symphysis for 88.9% of patients (median -4.69mm[-30.8to18.2]), 100% were more than 7.5mm inferiorly from the vas deferens (median-22.1mm[-32.7to-7.7]). Laterally, 100% recurrences were more than 7.5mm medial from obturator internus (median 5.37mm [-23.1to37.8]), and 88.9% were more than 10mm from midline (median 23.1mm [2.0-36.6]). CONCLUSION The 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET local recurrences can provide detailed localization of prostate bed and seminal vesicle recurrences. Our data can inform contouring guidelines for salvage radiotherapy to the prostate bed, particularly when using anatomical landmarks to define cranio-caudal extent of target volumes. For target volume laterally, the medial wall of levator ani would encompass all prostate bed recurrences, and no seminal vesicles recurrences were seen at the medial border of the obturator internus muscle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Kelly
- Genesis Care Epping, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - E Chan
- Genesis Care Australia, Melbourne, Australia
| | - A Benson
- Genesis Care, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - S Masoumi
- Genesis Care Australia, Melbourne, Australia
| | - E Perry
- Pacific Radiology, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - K Taubman
- St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Dept. of Nuclear Medicine, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia
| | - T Sutherland
- St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Dept. of Nuclear Medicine, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia
| | - G Ong
- Genesis Care, Shepparton, VIC, Australia
| | | | - M W T Chao
- Genesis Care Australia, Melbourne, Australia
| | - L M Wong
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - M Ng
- Genesis Care, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dixon S, Benson A, Kalaiselvan R, Kanwar S, Samad A, Pritchard-Jones R, West C, Scott M. OC-022 MAINTAINING AN ELECTIVE ABDOMINAL WALL RECONSTRUCTION SERVICE DURING THE COVID 19 PANDEMIC. Br J Surg 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac308.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Aim
Elective surgery services suffered significantly due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to analyse the impact and outcomes of abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) performed during the COVID-19 pandemic, assessing safety and sustainability.
Material and Methods
A retrospective review of all patients undergoing AWR in a single NHS trust, multiple surgeons, between 23rd March 2020 and 22rd March 2022, the 2 years following U.K. Government imposed lockdown, was undertaken and compared with the pre-pandemic AWR activity. Procedures were initially undertaken at a cold site and when demonstrated to be safe, main site operating restarted. The primary outcome was 90 day mortality, secondary outcomes of COVID-19 infection within 7 days, length of stay, critical care requirement, and complication rate.
Results
In the study period, 173 patients underwent AWR, compared with 99 cases in a single year preceding lockdown. 90 day mortality rate was zero. No patients returned positive COVID tests to the trust within 7 days of AWR, and no patients were readmitted for COVID related symptoms. Critical care admission was required in 7 patients, 3 of these were planned admissions pre-operatively. The surgical site occurrence rate was 9.8% (17), infection 5.8% (10), seroma 2.3% (4) and haematoma 1.7% (3). There were no recurrences reported, with follow up ranging between 1 and 18 months.
Conclusion
Continuing AWR services during the COVID pandemic is feasible and safe. Peri-operative COVID infection rates are low, critical care requirements minimal, and there is no impact on patient morbidity or mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Dixon
- General Surgery, St Helens and Knowsley Trust , Liverpool , United Kingdom
| | - A Benson
- Plastic Surgery, St Helens and Knowsley Trust , Liverpool , United Kingdom
| | - R Kalaiselvan
- General Surgery, St Helens and Knowsley Trust , Liverpool , United Kingdom
| | - S Kanwar
- General Surgery, St Helens and Knowsley Trust , Liverpool , United Kingdom
| | - A Samad
- General Surgery, St Helens and Knowsley Trust , Liverpool , United Kingdom
| | - R Pritchard-Jones
- Plastic Surgery, St Helens and Knowsley Trust , Liverpool , United Kingdom
| | - C West
- Plastic Surgery, St Helens and Knowsley Trust , Liverpool , United Kingdom
| | - M Scott
- General Surgery, St Helens and Knowsley Trust , Liverpool , United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dixon S, Benson A, Kalaiselvan R, Kanwar S, Samad A, Pritchard-Jones R, West C, Scott M. P-135 FIRST EXPERIENCE WITH A NEW CLOSED INCISION NEGATIVE PRESSURE WOUND THERAPY, PREVENA™, IN ABDOMINAL WALL RECONSTRUCTION PATIENTS. Br J Surg 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac308.232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Aim
Surgical site infection (SSI) contributes a significant proportion of post operative morbidity in patients undergoing abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR). Prevena™ closed incision negative pressure wound therapy (ciNPT) has been demonstrated to reduce SSI rates in the elective and emergency laparotomy setting. However, there is no evidence for Prevena™ use in AWR patients. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and feasibility of Prevena™ in AWR patients.
Materials and Method
Patients undergoing AWR at a single trust were selected at random to receive Prevena™. This was applied to the incision under sterile conditions, a continuous pressure of -125mmHg was applied for 7 days. The primary outcome measure was SSI, with secondary outcomes of 90 day mortality, complications and length of stay.
Results
10 patients received ciNPT in the study period, 8 female 2 male, mean BMI was 34.5. All patients had a Rives-Stoppa repair, with 2 patients also requiring bilateral transversus abdominal release (TAR). A vertical panniculectomy with umboplasty was used in 7 cases, fleur-de-lys panniculectomy with umboplasty in 2 cases, and a single case approached via transverse panniculectomy. There were no deaths within 90 days, median length of stay was 4 days. There was a single SSI managed with oral antibiotics, not requiring admission.
Conclusion
Prevena™ has been shown to reduce SSI rates in other patient cohorts and this small series demonstrates it is feasible and safe to use in the AWR setting. Larger studies are required to demonstrate SSI rate reduction in AWR patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Dixon
- General Surgery, St Helens and Knowsley Trust , Liverpool , United Kingdom
| | - A Benson
- Plastic Surgery, St Helens and Knowsley Trust , Liverpool , United Kingdom
| | - R Kalaiselvan
- General Surgery, St Helens and Knowsley Trust , Liverpool , United Kingdom
| | - S Kanwar
- General Surgery, St Helens and Knowsley Trust , Liverpool , United Kingdom
| | - A Samad
- General Surgery, St Helens and Knowsley Trust , Liverpool , United Kingdom
| | - R Pritchard-Jones
- Plastic Surgery, St Helens and Knowsley Trust , Liverpool , United Kingdom
| | - C West
- Plastic Surgery, St Helens and Knowsley Trust , Liverpool , United Kingdom
| | - M Scott
- General Surgery, St Helens and Knowsley Trust , Liverpool , United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Adams ST, Slade D, Shuttleworth P, West C, Scott M, Benson A, Tokala A, Walsh CJ. Reading a preoperative CT scan to guide complex abdominal wall reconstructive surgery. Hernia 2022; 27:265-272. [PMID: 34988686 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-021-02548-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Accepted: 12/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Computed tomography (CT) scanning is the imaging modality of choice when planning the overall management and operative approach to complex abdominal wall hernias. Despite its availability and well-recognised benefits there are no guidelines or recommendations regarding how best to read or report such scans for this application. In this paper we aim to outline an approach to interpreting preoperative CT scans in abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR). This approach breaks up the interpretive process into 4 steps-concentrating on the hernia or hernias, any complicating features of the hernia(s), the surrounding soft tissues and the abdominopelvic cavity as a whole-and was developed as a distillation of the authors' collective experience. We describe the key features that should be looked for at each of the four steps and the rationale for their inclusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S T Adams
- Department of Plastic Surgery, St Helen's and Knowsley Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Prescot, Merseyside, UK. .,Department of General Surgery, Wirral University Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Arrowe Park Hospital, Arrowe Park Rd, Upton, Wirral, CH49 5PE, UK. .,Department of General Surgery, St Helen's and Knowsley Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Prescot, Merseyside, UK.
| | - D Slade
- Department of Surgery, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, Lancashire, UK
| | - P Shuttleworth
- Department of General Surgery, Wirral University Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Arrowe Park Hospital, Arrowe Park Rd, Upton, Wirral, CH49 5PE, UK
| | - C West
- Department of Plastic Surgery, St Helen's and Knowsley Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Prescot, Merseyside, UK
| | - M Scott
- Department of General Surgery, St Helen's and Knowsley Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Prescot, Merseyside, UK
| | - A Benson
- Department of Plastic Surgery, St Helen's and Knowsley Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Prescot, Merseyside, UK
| | - A Tokala
- Department of Radiology, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, Lancashire, UK
| | - C J Walsh
- Department of General Surgery, Wirral University Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Arrowe Park Hospital, Arrowe Park Rd, Upton, Wirral, CH49 5PE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Palmedo H, Eschmann S, Werner A, Selinski I, Möllers MO, Kalinovsky J, Benson A, Poeppel T. Pain evaluation in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with radium-223 (Ra-223) in the PARABO observation study. Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz248.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
6
|
Van Cutsem E, Amonkar M, Fuchs C, Alsina M, Özgüroğlu M, Bang YJ, Chung H, Muro K, Goekkurt E, Benson A, Sun W, Wainberg Z, Norquist J, Chen X, Shih CS, Shitara K. Impact of pembrolizumab (pembro) versus paclitaxel on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer that has progressed after first-line chemotherapy (KEYNOTE-061). Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz247.117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
7
|
Kirrane EF, Luben TJ, Benson A, Owens EO, Sacks JD, Dutton SJ, Madden M, Nichols JL. A systematic review of cardiovascular responses associated with ambient black carbon and fine particulate matter. Environ Int 2019; 127:305-316. [PMID: 30953813 PMCID: PMC8517909 DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.02.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2018] [Revised: 02/07/2019] [Accepted: 02/10/2019] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5), an ambient air pollutant with mass-based standards promulgated under the Clean Air Act, and black carbon (BC), a common component of PM2.5, are both associated with cardiovascular health effects. OBJECTIVES To elucidate whether BC is associated with distinct, or stronger, cardiovascular responses compared to PM2.5, we conducted a systematic review. We evaluated the associations of short- and long-term BC, or the related component elemental carbon (EC), with cardiovascular endpoints including heart rate variability, heart rhythm, blood pressure and vascular function, ST segment depression, repolarization abnormalities, atherosclerosis and heart function, in the context of what is already known about PM2.5. DATA SOURCES We conducted a stepwise systematic literature search of the PubMed, Web of Science and TOXLINE databases and applied Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for reporting our results. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Studies reporting effect estimates for the association of quantitative measurements of ambient BC (or EC) and PM2.5, with relevant cardiovascular endpoints (i.e. meeting inclusion criteria) were included in the review. Included studies were evaluated for risk of bias in study design and results. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS Risk of bias evaluations assessed aspects of internal validity of study findings based on study design, conduct, and reporting to identify potential issues related to confounding or other biases. Study results are presented to facilitate comparison of the consistency of associations with PM2.5 and BC within and across studies. RESULTS Our results demonstrate similar associations for BC (or EC) and PM2.5 with the cardiovascular endpoints examined. Across studies, associations for BC and PM2.5 varied in their magnitude and precision, and confidence intervals were generally overlapping within studies. Where differences in the magnitude of the association between BC or EC and PM2.5 within a study could be discerned, no consistent pattern across the studies examined was apparent. LIMITATIONS We were unable to assess the independence of the effect of BC, relative the effect of PM2.5, on the cardiovascular system, nor was information available to understand the impact of differential exposure misclassification. CONCLUSIONS Overall, the evidence indicates that both BC (or EC) and PM2.5 are associated with cardiovascular effects but the available evidence is not sufficient to distinguish the effect of BC (or EC) from that of PM2.5 mass.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E F Kirrane
- National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
| | - T J Luben
- National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - A Benson
- Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, TN, USA
| | - E O Owens
- National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA; National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - J D Sacks
- National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - S J Dutton
- National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - M Madden
- Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, TN, USA; Economics Department, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - J L Nichols
- National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sandoval Leon AC, Medina Saenz K, Miller P, Benson A, Calfa C, Mahtani R, Slingerland J, Perez A, Vogel C, Valdes-Albini F, El-Ashry D, Lippman M. Abstract P4-01-07: A comprehensive liquid biopsy in patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p4-01-07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Precision medicine is revolutionizing breast cancer (BC) care. Comprehensive liquid biopsies are a tool for personalized care in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). Identifying robust biomarkers as part of a comprehensive liquid biopsy to predict response to treatment is of immense clinical interest.
Methods: After obtaining IRB approval, serial blood samples were collected from patients with LABC undergoing neoadjuvant therapy. Paired biopsies were collected prior to treatment and were sent to Foundation Medicine for next-generation sequencing (NGS). We used a sized-base microfilter technology to capture circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and circulating cancer associated fibroblasts (cCAFs). Patients with one or more CTCs or cCAFs were deemed positive for these tests. Additionally, in collaboration with Foundation Medicine, we extracted circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and we analyzed it using the FoundationACT platform. Patients with a detectable genomic alteration in their plasma were considered as having a positive ctDNA test. Our primary objective is to determine if a comprehensive liquid biopsy can serve as a prognostic marker of pathologic complete response (pCR).
Results: For this analysis we describe our findings in the initial blood draw of the first 18 patients enrolled. The mean age is 54 years (38-70). All patients who had their tumors sequenced had a detectable mutation. Consistent with the findings of others, we found TP53 mutations to be the most prevalent at 83.3%. We found that 44% of patients had ctDNA, 68.4% had cCAFs and 78.9% had CTCs. Many patients also had clusters of cells, consisting of one cell type, or co-clusters, consisting of both. 38.9% had CTC clusters, 16.7% had cCAF clusters and 16.7% had co-clusters (CTCs and cCAFs together). Some patients with CTCs did not have cCAFs and vice versa. The number of CTCs and cCAFS did not correlate with stage of disease or receptor status.
Conclusions: We describe a comprehensive liquid biopsy combining a sized-based microfilter technology for CTC and cCAFs identification and the FoundationACT platform for ctDNA analysis is feasible and these biomarkers can be detected in patients with LABC prior to the initiation of neoadjuvant therapy. Our study is accruing rapidly, and we will update our results with the longitudinal collection and the prognostic value of a comprehensive liquid biopsy at the time of the meeting.
Citation Format: Sandoval Leon AC, Medina Saenz K, Miller P, Benson A, Calfa C, Mahtani R, Slingerland J, Perez A, Vogel C, Valdes-Albini F, El-Ashry D, Lippman M. A comprehensive liquid biopsy in patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-01-07.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- AC Sandoval Leon
- University of Miami, Miami, Fl; Foundation Medicine, Inc, Cambridge, MA; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - K Medina Saenz
- University of Miami, Miami, Fl; Foundation Medicine, Inc, Cambridge, MA; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - P Miller
- University of Miami, Miami, Fl; Foundation Medicine, Inc, Cambridge, MA; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - A Benson
- University of Miami, Miami, Fl; Foundation Medicine, Inc, Cambridge, MA; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - C Calfa
- University of Miami, Miami, Fl; Foundation Medicine, Inc, Cambridge, MA; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - R Mahtani
- University of Miami, Miami, Fl; Foundation Medicine, Inc, Cambridge, MA; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - J Slingerland
- University of Miami, Miami, Fl; Foundation Medicine, Inc, Cambridge, MA; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - A Perez
- University of Miami, Miami, Fl; Foundation Medicine, Inc, Cambridge, MA; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - C Vogel
- University of Miami, Miami, Fl; Foundation Medicine, Inc, Cambridge, MA; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - F Valdes-Albini
- University of Miami, Miami, Fl; Foundation Medicine, Inc, Cambridge, MA; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - D El-Ashry
- University of Miami, Miami, Fl; Foundation Medicine, Inc, Cambridge, MA; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - M Lippman
- University of Miami, Miami, Fl; Foundation Medicine, Inc, Cambridge, MA; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zinzani P, Santoro A, Mollica L, Follows G, Bouabdallah K, Morschhauser F, Patnaik A, Huang L, Hiemeyer F, Benson A, Genvresse I, Garcia-Vargas J, Childs B, Dreyling M. Copanlisib monotherapy activity in relapsed or refractory indolent B-cell lymphoma: Combined analysis from phase I and II studies. Ann Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy286.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
10
|
Poeppel T, Eschmann S, Werner A, Selkinski I, Möllers MO, Neußer T, Benson A, Kalinovsky J, Palmedo H. Symptomatic skeletal event (SSE) dynamics in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with radium-223 (Ra-223): An interim review of a prospective, non-interventional study (PARABO). Ann Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy284.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
11
|
Rao S, Sclafani F, Eng C, Grønlie Guren M, Adams R, Benson A, Sebag-Montefiore D, Segelov E, Bryant A, Peckitt C, Roy A, Seymour M, Welch J, Saunders M, Muirhead R, Bridgewater J, Falk S, Glynne-Jones R, Arnold D, Cunningham D. InterAACT: A multicentre open label randomised phase II advanced anal cancer trial of cisplatin (CDDP) plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) vs carboplatin (C) plus weekly paclitaxel (P) in patients (pts) with inoperable locally recurrent (ILR) or metastatic treatment naïve disease - An International Rare Cancers Initiative (IRCI) trial. Ann Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy424.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
12
|
Fuchs MA, Yuan C, Sato K, Niedzwiecki D, Ye X, Saltz LB, Mayer RJ, Mowat RB, Whittom R, Hantel A, Benson A, Atienza D, Messino M, Kindler H, Venook A, Innocenti F, Warren RS, Bertagnolli MM, Ogino S, Giovannucci EL, Horvath E, Meyerhardt JA, Ng K. Predicted vitamin D status and colon cancer recurrence and mortality in CALGB 89803 (Alliance). Ann Oncol 2018; 28:1359-1367. [PMID: 28327908 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Observational studies suggest that higher levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25(OH)D) are associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer and improved survival of colorectal cancer patients. However, the influence of vitamin D status on cancer recurrence and survival of patients with stage III colon cancer is unknown. Patients and methods We prospectively examined the influence of post-diagnosis predicted plasma 25(OH)D on outcome among 1016 patients with stage III colon cancer who were enrolled in a National Cancer Institute-sponsored adjuvant therapy trial (CALGB 89803). Predicted 25(OH)D scores were computed using validated regression models. We examined the influence of predicted 25(OH)D scores on cancer recurrence and mortality (disease-free survival; DFS) using Cox proportional hazards. Results Patients in the highest quintile of predicted 25(OH)D score had an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for colon cancer recurrence or mortality (DFS) of 0.62 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-0.86), compared with those in the lowest quintile (Ptrend = 0.005). Higher predicted 25(OH)D score was also associated with a significant improvement in recurrence-free survival and overall survival (Ptrend = 0.01 and 0.0004, respectively). The benefit associated with higher predicted 25(OH)D score appeared consistent across predictors of cancer outcome and strata of molecular tumor characteristics, including microsatellite instability and KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, and TP53 mutation status. Conclusion Higher predicted 25(OH)D levels after a diagnosis of stage III colon cancer may be associated with decreased recurrence and improved survival. Clinical trials assessing the benefit of vitamin D supplementation in the adjuvant setting are warranted. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00003835.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M A Fuchs
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - C Yuan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston.,Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston
| | - K Sato
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - D Niedzwiecki
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham
| | - X Ye
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham
| | - L B Saltz
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York
| | - R J Mayer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - R B Mowat
- Toledo Community Hospital Oncology Program, Toledo, USA
| | - R Whittom
- Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - A Hantel
- Edward Cancer Center, Naperville
| | - A Benson
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago
| | - D Atienza
- Virginia Oncology Associates, Norfolk
| | - M Messino
- Southeast Cancer Control Consortium, Mission Hospitals-Memorial Campus, Asheville
| | | | - A Venook
- University of California at San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco
| | - F Innocenti
- Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill
| | - R S Warren
- University of California at San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco
| | - M M Bertagnolli
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston.,Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - S Ogino
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston.,Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston.,Division of MPE Molecular Pathological Epidemiology, Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - E L Giovannucci
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston.,Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston.,Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - E Horvath
- Alliance Protocol Operations Office, Chicago, USA
| | - J A Meyerhardt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - K Ng
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bonnetain F, Borg C, Adams RR, Ajani JA, Benson A, Bleiberg H, Chibaudel B, Diaz-Rubio E, Douillard JY, Fuchs CS, Giantonio BJ, Goldberg R, Heinemann V, Koopman M, Labianca R, Larsen AK, Maughan T, Mitchell E, Peeters M, Punt CJA, Schmoll HJ, Tournigand C, de Gramont A. How health-related quality of life assessment should be used in advanced colorectal cancer clinical trials. Ann Oncol 2017; 28:2077-2085. [PMID: 28430862 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Traditionally, the efficacy of cancer treatment in patients with advance or metastatic disease in clinical studies has been studied using overall survival and more recently tumor-based end points such as progression-free survival, measurements of response to treatment. However, these seem not to be the relevant clinical end points in current situation if such end points were no validated as surrogate of overall survival to demonstrate the clinical efficacy. Appropriate, meaningful, primary patient-oriented and patient-reported end points that adequately measure the effects of new therapeutic interventions are then crucial for the advancement of clinical research in metastatic colorectal cancer to complement the results of tumor-based end points. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is effectively an evaluation of quality of life and its relationship with health over time. HRQoL includes the patient report at least of the way a disease or its treatment affects its physical, emotional and social well-being. Over the past few years, several phase III trials in a variety of solid cancers have assessed the incremental value of HRQoL in addition to the traditional end points of tumor response and survival results. HRQoL could provide not only complementary clinical data to the primary outcomes, but also more precise predictive and prognostic value. This end point is useful for both clinicians and patients in order to achieve the dogma of precision medicine. The present article examines the use of HRQoL in phase III metastatic colorectal cancer clinical trials, outlines the importance of HRQoL assessment methods, analysis, and results presentation. Moreover, it discusses the relevance of including HRQoL as a primary/co-primary end point to support the progression-free survival results and to assess efficacy of treatment in the advanced disease setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Bonnetain
- Methodology and Quality of Life Unit, Oncology Department (INSERM UMR 1098), Quality of Life and Cancer Clinical Research Platform
| | - C Borg
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon
- Centre d'Investigation Clinique en Biothérapie, CIC-1431, Nantes
- 11UMR1098 INSERM/Université de Franche Comté/Etablissement Français du Sang, Besançon
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France
| | - R R Adams
- Cardiff University and Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK
| | - J A Ajani
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - A Benson
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Northwestern Medical Group, Chicago, USA
| | - H Bleiberg
- Montagne de Saint Job, Brussels, Belgium
| | - B Chibaudel
- Institut Hospitalier Franco-Britannique, Levallois-Perret, France
| | - E Diaz-Rubio
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - J Y Douillard
- Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest (ICO), Nantes St-Herblain, France
| | - C S Fuchs
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| | - B J Giantonio
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - R Goldberg
- Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center-James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, USA
| | - V Heinemann
- Department of Internal Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Klinikum Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - M Koopman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R Labianca
- Cancer Center, Ospedale Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - A K Larsen
- Cancer Biology and Therapeutics, INSERM and Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France
| | - T Maughan
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Gray Laboratories, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - E Mitchell
- Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA
| | - M Peeters
- Department of Oncology, Center for Oncological Research Antwerp, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - C J A Punt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H J Schmoll
- Department of Internal Medicine IV, University Clinic Halle, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | - C Tournigand
- Department of Oncology, University of Paris Est Creteil; APHP, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - A de Gramont
- Institut Hospitalier Franco-Britannique, Levallois-Perret, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Disel U, Madison R, Chung J, Gounder M, Oztan A, Benson A, Webster J, Klempner S, Ou SH, Ganesan S, Janeway K, Stephens P, Ross J, Schrock A, Miller V, Ali S. Co-amplification of KIT/KDR/PDGRA in over 100,000 advanced cancer cases. Ann Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx390.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
15
|
Zinzani P, Dreyling M, Patnaik A, Morschhauser F, Benson A, Genvresse I, Miriyala A, Garcia-Vargas J, Childs B. INTEGRATED SAFETY DATA WITH COPANLISIB MONOTHERAPY FROM PHASE I AND II TRIALS IN PATIENTS WITH RELAPSED INDOLENT NON-HODGKIN'S LYMPHOMA. Hematol Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1002/hon.2438_141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- P. Zinzani
- Department of Hematology; Institute of Hematology "L. e A. Seràgnoli"- University of Bologna; Bologna Italy
| | - M. Dreyling
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik III; Klinikum der Universität München-Grosshadern; Munich Germany
| | - A. Patnaik
- Medical Oncology; South Texas Accelerated Research Therapeutics (START) Center for Cancer Care; San Antonio TX USA
| | - F. Morschhauser
- Department of Hematology; CHRU - Hôpital Claude Huriez; Lille France
| | - A. Benson
- Clinical Statistics; Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc; Whippany-NJ USA
| | - I. Genvresse
- Pharmaceutical Division, Bayer AG; Berlin Germany
| | - A. Miriyala
- Clinical Development; Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc; Whippany-NJ USA
| | - J. Garcia-Vargas
- Clinical Development; Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc; Whippany-NJ USA
| | - B.H. Childs
- Clinical Development; Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc; Whippany-NJ USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bleiberg H, Decoster G, de Gramont A, Rougier P, Sobrero A, Benson A, Chibaudel B, Douillard JY, Eng C, Fuchs C, Fujii M, Labianca R, Larsen AK, Mitchell E, Schmoll HJ, Sprumont D, Zalcberg J. A need to simplify informed consent documents in cancer clinical trials. A position paper of the ARCAD Group. Ann Oncol 2017; 28:922-930. [PMID: 28453700 PMCID: PMC5406755 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In respect of the principle of autonomy and the right of self-determination, obtaining an informed consent of potential participants before their inclusion in a study is a fundamental ethical obligation. The variations in national laws, regulations, and cultures contribute to complex informed consent documents for patients participating in clinical trials. Currently, only few ethics committees seem willing to address the complexity and the length of these documents and to request investigators and sponsors to revise them in a way to make them understandable for potential participants. The purpose of this work is to focus on the written information in the informed consent documentation for drug development clinical trials and suggests (i) to distinguish between necessary and not essential information, (ii) to define the optimal format allowing the best legibility of those documents. Methods The Aide et Recherche en Cancérologie Digestive (ARCAD) Group, an international scientific committee involving oncologists from all over the world, addressed these issues and developed and uniformly accepted a simplified informed consent documentation for future clinical research. Results A simplified form of informed consent with the leading part of 1200-1800 words containing all of the key information necessary to meet ethical and regulatory requirements and 'relevant supportive information appendix' of 2000-3000 words is provided. Conclusions This position paper, on the basis of the ARCAD Group experts discussions, proposes our informed consent model and the rationale for its content.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - A. de Gramont
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Hospitalier Franco-Britannique, Levallois Perret
| | - P. Rougier
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology Department, European Hospital, Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
| | - A. Sobrero
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - A. Benson
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Robert H. Comprehensive Cancer Center Northwestern University, Chicago, USA
| | - B. Chibaudel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Hospitalier Franco-Britannique, Levallois Perret
| | - J. Y. Douillard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre R. Gauducheau Université de Nantes, Saint Herblain, France
| | - C. Eng
- Division of Cancer Medicine, Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - C. Fuchs
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - M. Fujii
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - R. Labianca
- Cancer Center, Ospedale Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - A. K. Larsen
- Laboratory of Cancer Biology and Therapeutics, INSERM and Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Saint-Antoine Hospital, Paris, France
| | - E. Mitchell
- Kimmel Cancer Center at Jefferson, Jefferson University Hospitals, Philadelphia, USA
| | - H. J. Schmoll
- Department of Internal Medicine IV, University Clinic Halle, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | - D. Sprumont
- Institute of Health Law, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland
| | - J. Zalcberg
- Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Smrity S, Benson A, Gupta R, Gale R, Green M, Walters G, Mackenzie S, Gough A. SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS AND ANTI-PHOSPHOLIPID SYNDROMEE60. NEW OPHTHALMIC MONITORING OF HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE: WILL THIS LEAD TO MORE PATIENTS HAVING THEIR TREATMENT STOPPED? Rheumatology (Oxford) 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex063.059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
18
|
Ringenbach SDR, Holzapfel SD, Mulvey GM, Jimenez A, Benson A, Richter M. The effects of assisted cycling therapy (ACT) and voluntary cycling on reaction time and measures of executive function in adolescents with Down syndrome. J Intellect Disabil Res 2016; 60:1073-1085. [PMID: 27018305 DOI: 10.1111/jir.12275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2015] [Accepted: 02/19/2016] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reports of positive effects of aerobic exercise on cognitive function in persons with Down syndrome are extremely limited. However, a novel exercise intervention, termed assisted cycling therapy (ACT), has resulted in acutely improved cognitive planning ability and reaction times as well as improved cognitive planning after 8 weeks of ACT in adolescents and young adults with Down syndrome. Here, we report the effects of 8 weeks of ACT on reaction time, set-shifting, inhibition and language fluency in adolescents with Down syndrome. METHODS Adolescents with Down syndrome (age: ~18 years) were randomly assigned to 8 weeks of ACT (n = 17) or voluntary cycling (VC: n = 16), and a convenience sample (n = 11) was assigned to be an inactive comparison group (NC: n = 11). During ACT, the cycling cadence of the participants was augmented to an average cadence that was 80% faster than the voluntary cadence of the VC group. The increase in cadence was achieved with an electric motor in the stationary bicycle. Reaction time, set-shifting, inhibition and language fluency were assessed before and after 8 weeks of intervention. RESULTS Power output and heart rates of the ACT and VC groups were almost identical, but the ACT cadence was significantly faster. The ACT group, but not the VC or NC groups, showed significantly improved reactions times (Hedges' g = -0.42) and inhibitory control (g = 0.18). Only the VC group showed improved set-shifting ability (g = 0.57). The ACT and VC groups displayed improved semantic language fluency (g = 0.25, g = 0.22, respectively). DISCUSSIONS These and previous results support the hypothesis of increased neuroplasticity and prefrontal cortex function following ACT and, to a smaller extent, following VC. Both ACT and VC appear to be associated with cortical benefits, but based on current and previous results, ACT seems to maximize the benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S D R Ringenbach
- School of Nutrition and Health Promotion, College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
| | - S D Holzapfel
- School of Nutrition and Health Promotion, College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
| | - G M Mulvey
- School of Nutrition and Health Promotion, College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
| | - A Jimenez
- School of Nutrition and Health Promotion, College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
| | - A Benson
- School of Nutrition and Health Promotion, College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
| | - M Richter
- School of Nutrition and Health Promotion, College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Van Cutsem E, Cervantes A, Adam R, Sobrero A, Van Krieken JH, Aderka D, Aranda Aguilar E, Bardelli A, Benson A, Bodoky G, Ciardiello F, D'Hoore A, Diaz-Rubio E, Douillard JY, Ducreux M, Falcone A, Grothey A, Gruenberger T, Haustermans K, Heinemann V, Hoff P, Köhne CH, Labianca R, Laurent-Puig P, Ma B, Maughan T, Muro K, Normanno N, Österlund P, Oyen WJG, Papamichael D, Pentheroudakis G, Pfeiffer P, Price TJ, Punt C, Ricke J, Roth A, Salazar R, Scheithauer W, Schmoll HJ, Tabernero J, Taïeb J, Tejpar S, Wasan H, Yoshino T, Zaanan A, Arnold D. ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 2016; 27:1386-422. [PMID: 27380959 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2158] [Impact Index Per Article: 269.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2016] [Accepted: 05/31/2016] [Indexed: 02/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignancies in Western countries. Over the last 20 years, and the last decade in particular, the clinical outcome for patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC) has improved greatly due not only to an increase in the number of patients being referred for and undergoing surgical resection of their localised metastatic disease but also to a more strategic approach to the delivery of systemic therapy and an expansion in the use of ablative techniques. This reflects the increase in the number of patients that are being managed within a multidisciplinary team environment and specialist cancer centres, and the emergence over the same time period not only of improved imaging techniques but also prognostic and predictive molecular markers. Treatment decisions for patients with mCRC must be evidence-based. Thus, these ESMO consensus guidelines have been developed based on the current available evidence to provide a series of evidence-based recommendations to assist in the treatment and management of patients with mCRC in this rapidly evolving treatment setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Van Cutsem
- Digestive Oncology, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - A Cervantes
- Medical Oncology Department, INCLIVA University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - R Adam
- Hepato-Biliary Centre, Paul Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France
| | - A Sobrero
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Martino Hospital, Genova, Italy
| | - J H Van Krieken
- Research Institute for Oncology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - D Aderka
- Division of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - E Aranda Aguilar
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital Reina Sofia, Cordoba, Spain
| | - A Bardelli
- School of Medicine, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - A Benson
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Northwestern Medical Group, Chicago, USA
| | - G Bodoky
- Department of Oncology, St László Hospital, Budapest, Hungary
| | - F Ciardiello
- Division of Medical Oncology, Seconda Università di Napoli, Naples, Italy
| | - A D'Hoore
- Abdominal Surgery, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - E Diaz-Rubio
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - J-Y Douillard
- Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest (ICO), St Herblain
| | - M Ducreux
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - A Falcone
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, University Hospital 'S. Chiara', Istituto Toscano Tumori, Pisa, Italy
| | - A Grothey
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - T Gruenberger
- Department of Surgery I, Rudolfstiftung Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - K Haustermans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - V Heinemann
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Clinic Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - P Hoff
- Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - C-H Köhne
- Northwest German Cancer Center, University Campus Klinikum Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - R Labianca
- Cancer Center, Ospedale Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - P Laurent-Puig
- Digestive Oncology Department, European Hospital Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
| | - B Ma
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, State Key Laboratory in Oncology in South China, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - T Maughan
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Gray Laboratories, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - K Muro
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Outpatient Treatment Center, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - N Normanno
- Cell Biology and Biotherapy Unit, I.N.T. Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - P Österlund
- Helsinki University Central Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki, Finland Department of Oncology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - W J G Oyen
- The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - D Papamichael
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - G Pentheroudakis
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - P Pfeiffer
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - T J Price
- Haematology and Medical Oncology Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, Australia
| | - C Punt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Ricke
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Clinic Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - A Roth
- Digestive Tumors Unit, Geneva University Hospitals (HUG), Geneva, Switzerland
| | - R Salazar
- Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - W Scheithauer
- Department of Internal Medicine I and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - H J Schmoll
- Department of Internal Medicine IV, University Clinic Halle, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | - J Tabernero
- Medical Oncology Department, Vall d' Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (V.H.I.O.), Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Taïeb
- Digestive Oncology Department, European Hospital Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
| | - S Tejpar
- Digestive Oncology, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - H Wasan
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - T Yoshino
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - A Zaanan
- Digestive Oncology Department, European Hospital Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
| | - D Arnold
- Instituto CUF de Oncologia (ICO), Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Gordon B, Benson A. Determination of glycaemic fluctuations with continuous glucose monitoring. What is a meaningful difference? J Sci Med Sport 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2015.12.377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
21
|
Benson A, O'Toole S, Lambert V, Gallagher P, Shahwan A, Austin JK. To tell or not to tell: A systematic review of the disclosure practices of children living with epilepsy and their parents. Epilepsy Behav 2015; 51:73-95. [PMID: 26262936 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.07.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2015] [Revised: 07/04/2015] [Accepted: 07/06/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Disclosing an epilepsy diagnosis to others is complex due to the condition's largely invisible nature and associated stigma. Despite this, little has been documented in terms of what this process involves for children living with epilepsy (CWE) and their parents. A systematic review was conducted to examine and synthesize evidence pertaining to: (i) the disclosure practices of CWE and their parents, (ii) enablers and barriers for disclosure, (iii) the impact of disclosure practices, and (iv) the relationship between disclosure management and other variables. The electronic databases PsycINFO, PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched systematically. Any empirical, peer-reviewed journal articles with findings reported regarding the self- or proxy-reported disclosure practices of children aged 0-18years with any type of epilepsy and/or their parents were deemed eligible for inclusion. Two review authors completed all stages of screening, data extraction, and quality assessment independently with two additional review authors resolving any discrepancies. A total of 32 articles were included in the review. Only one dated study examined disclosure as a primary focus; in the remaining studies, disclosure was a subfocus of larger studies or pertinent qualitative themes/subthemes incidentally emerged. The limited evidence suggests that: 1) CWE and parents adopt varying disclosure management strategies - from concealment to voluntary disclosure; 2) disclosure decisions are challenging for CWE and parents; 3) many barriers to disclosure exist (e.g., fear of stigmatization and rejection); 4) only a limited number of factors that enable disclosure are known (e.g., openness by others to engage with and learn about epilepsy); 5) disclosure management is significantly related to a number of variables (e.g., child/maternal perceived stigma and seizure control); and 6) there are varying outcomes for CWE and/or their parents in accordance with the adoption of specific disclosure management strategies (e.g., disclosure resulting in greater acceptance and the receipt of support or evoking anxiety/fear in others; and concealment resulting in misunderstandings, embarrassment, and stigma-coaching), but the evidence remains inconclusive in terms of which disclosure management strategy is optimal. While some preliminary work has been conducted, disclosure of epilepsy is a topic that has been largely neglected to date. This is despite the fact that disclosure is a significant source of concern for CWE and parent populations. Future studies should focus on elucidating the unique contextual factors that inform disclosure decisions in order to develop a theoretical framework that can explain the epilepsy disclosure decision-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Benson
- School of Nursing and Human Sciences, Faculty of Science and Health, Dublin City University, Dublin 9, Ireland
| | - S O'Toole
- School of Nursing and Human Sciences, Faculty of Science and Health, Dublin City University, Dublin 9, Ireland
| | - V Lambert
- School of Nursing and Human Sciences, Faculty of Science and Health, Dublin City University, Dublin 9, Ireland.
| | - P Gallagher
- School of Nursing and Human Sciences, Faculty of Science and Health, Dublin City University, Dublin 9, Ireland
| | - A Shahwan
- Neurology Department, Temple Street Children's University Hospital, Temple Street, Dublin 1, Ireland
| | - J K Austin
- Indiana University School of Nursing, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
O'Toole S, Benson A, Lambert V, Gallagher P, Shahwan A, Austin JK. Family communication in the context of pediatric epilepsy: A systematic review. Epilepsy Behav 2015; 51:225-39. [PMID: 26298868 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.06.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2015] [Revised: 06/06/2015] [Accepted: 06/29/2015] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
In childhood chronic illness, family communication can impact the child's and parents' psychosocial well-being. However, little is known about family communication in the context of epilepsy in childhood. The aim of this systematic review was to identify the existing evidence available on communication strategies adopted by families living with childhood epilepsy, including; the facilitators, barriers and challenges experienced by families when choosing to communicate, or not, about epilepsy; and the consequences of this communication. Papers published in the English language prior to March 2015 were identified following a search of six electronic databases: PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Scopus. Studies were included if they involved a sample of parents of children with epilepsy or children/young people with epilepsy (0-18years of age) and used qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods. Following a comprehensive search and screening process, 26 studies were identified as eligible for inclusion in the review. No studies identified specific communication strategies adopted by families living with childhood epilepsy. Some studies found that talking about epilepsy with family members had positive consequences (e.g., communication as an effective coping strategy), with no negative consequences reported in any of the studies. The main barrier to communication for parents was an unwillingness to use the word "epilepsy" because of the perceived negative social connotations associated with the health condition. For children with epilepsy, barriers were as follows: parental desire to keep epilepsy a secret, parents' tendency to deny that the child had epilepsy, parental overprotection, and parents' tendency to impose greater restrictions on the child with epilepsy than on siblings without epilepsy. Future research investigating the communication strategies of families living with epilepsy is needed in order to create effective communication-based interventions for discussing epilepsy within the home.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S O'Toole
- School of Nursing and Human Sciences, Faculty of Science and Health, Dublin City University, Dublin 9, Ireland
| | - A Benson
- School of Nursing and Human Sciences, Faculty of Science and Health, Dublin City University, Dublin 9, Ireland
| | - V Lambert
- School of Nursing and Human Sciences, Faculty of Science and Health, Dublin City University, Dublin 9, Ireland.
| | - P Gallagher
- School of Nursing and Human Sciences, Faculty of Science and Health, Dublin City University, Dublin 9, Ireland
| | - A Shahwan
- Neurology Department, Temple Street Children's University Hospital, Temple Street, Dublin 1, Ireland
| | - J K Austin
- Professor Emerita, Indiana University School of Nursing, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Benson A, Krivoshik A, Van Sant C, Needle M. O-007 Neuropilin 1 (NRP1) may be prognostic and identify a subgroup of Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) who Benefit from Tivozanib + mFOLFOX6 compared to Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX6. Ann Oncol 2015. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv235.06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
24
|
Hunter J, Lythgo N, Gordon B, Benson A. Type of supervision does not affect attendance or physical fitness in an 8-week workplace exercise intervention. J Sci Med Sport 2014. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.11.098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
25
|
Benson A, Bendell J, Wainberg Z, Vyushkov D, Acs P, Kudrik F, Dong H, Thai D. A Phase 2 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Study of Simtuzumab or Placebo in Combination with Gemcitabine for the First Line Treatment of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Ann Oncol 2014. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu334.4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
26
|
Benson A, Bridgewater J, Kiss I, Eskens F, Chen J, Sasse C, Vossen S, van Sant C, Ball H, Keating A, Krisvoshik A. Baton-Crc: a Phase 2 Randomized Trial Comparing Tivozanib (Tivo) + Mfolfox6 with Bevacizumab (Bev) + Mfolfox6 in Stage Iv Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (Mcrc). Ann Oncol 2014. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu333.36] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
27
|
Saltzstein D, Wachs B, Perroncel R, Benson A, Herrington J, Haverstock D, Pertel P. Complicated Urinary Tract Infections Treated with Extended-Release Ciprofloxacin with Emphasis onPseudomonas aeruginosa. J Chemother 2013; 19:694-702. [DOI: 10.1179/joc.2007.19.6.694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
|
28
|
Benson A, Bruce L, Gordon B. Comparing the measurement of physical activity using sport specific GPS and an iPhone™ ‘app’. J Sci Med Sport 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2012.11.714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
29
|
Jenkinson K, Naughton G, Benson A. The GLAMA (Girls! Lead! Achieve! Mentor! Activate!) and BLAST (Boys! Lead! Activate! Succeed Together!) peer leadership and physical activity program: A stealth intervention. J Sci Med Sport 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2012.11.282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
30
|
Gibbons C, Bonyhay I, Benson A, Adler G, Freeman R. Experimental Hypoglycemia Is a Human Model of Stress-Induced Hyperalgesia (S38.002). Neurology 2012. [DOI: 10.1212/wnl.78.1_meetingabstracts.s38.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
31
|
Gibbons C, Bonyhay I, Benson A, Freeman R. The Pathophysiology of Neuropathic and Non-Neuropathic Postural Tachycardia Syndrome (P05.203). Neurology 2012. [DOI: 10.1212/wnl.78.1_meetingabstracts.p05.203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
32
|
Van Cutsem E, Dicato M, Geva R, Arber N, Bang Y, Benson A, Cervantes A, Diaz-Rubio E, Ducreux M, Glynne-Jones R, Grothey A, Haller D, Haustermans K, Kerr D, Nordlinger B, Marshall J, Minsky BD, Kang YK, Labianca R, Lordick F, Ohtsu A, Pavlidis N, Roth A, Rougier P, Schmoll HJ, Sobrero A, Tabernero J, Van de Velde C, Zalcberg J. The diagnosis and management of gastric cancer: expert discussion and recommendations from the 12th ESMO/World Congress on Gastrointestinal Cancer, Barcelona, 2010. Ann Oncol 2011; 22 Suppl 5:v1-9. [PMID: 21633049 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdr284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Well-recognized experts in the field of gastric cancer discussed during the 12th European Society Medical Oncology (ESMO)/World Congress Gastrointestinal Cancer (WCGIC) in Barcelona many important and controversial topics on the diagnosis and management of patients with gastric cancer. This article summarizes the recommendations and expert opinion on gastric cancer. It discusses and reflects on the regional differences in the incidence and care of gastric cancer, the definition of gastro-esophageal junction and its implication for treatment strategies and presents the latest recommendations in the staging and treatment of primary and metastatic gastric cancer. Recognition is given to the need for larger and well-designed clinical trials to answer many open questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Van Cutsem
- University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
McAsey M, Kontio J, Benson A, Gindlesperger V, Carter T, Kohler T. The effect of daily ejaculation on semen parameters and sperm DNA damage in normal men. Fertil Steril 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.07.895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
34
|
Jariwala SP, Abrams E, Benson A, Fodeman J, Zheng T. The role of thymic stromal lymphopoietin in the immunopathogenesis of atopic dermatitis. Clin Exp Allergy 2011; 41:1515-20. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2011.03797.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
35
|
Benson A, Mulcahy M, Siskin G, Wiseman G, Rilling W, Lewandowski R, Memon K, Geschwind J, Salem R. Abstract No. 1: Safety, response and survival outcomes of Y90 radioembolization for liver metastases: Results from a 151 patient investigational device exemption multi-institutional study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2011.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
36
|
Rajput A, Romanus D, Weiser MR, ter Veer A, Niland J, Wilson J, Skibber JM, Wong YN, Benson A, Earle CC, Schrag D. Meeting the 12 lymph node (LN) benchmark in colon cancer. J Surg Oncol 2010; 102:3-9. [PMID: 20578172 DOI: 10.1002/jso.21532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Examining >or=12 LN in colon cancer has been suggested as a quality metric. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the 12 LN benchmark is achieved at NCCN centers compared to a US population-based sample. METHODS Patients with stage I-III disease resected at NCCN centers were identified from a prospective database (n = 718) and were compared to 12,845 stage I-III patients diagnosed in a SEER region. Age, gender, location, stage, number of positive nodes were compared for NCCN and SEER data in regards to number of nodes evaluated. Multivariate logistic regression models were developed to identify factors associated with evaluating 12 LNs. RESULTS 92% of NCCN and 58% of SEER patients had >or=12 LN evaluated. For patients treated at NCCN centers, factors associated with not meeting the 12 LN target were left-sided tumors, stage I disease and BMI >30. CONCLUSIONS >or=12 LN are almost always evaluated in NCCN patients. In contrast, this target is achieved in 58% of SEER patients. With longer follow-up of the NCCN cohort we will be able to link this quality metric to patterns of recurrence and survival and thereby better understand whether increasing the number of nodes evaluated is a priority for cancer control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Rajput
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
|
38
|
Rimington C, Benson A. Partition of porphyrins between cyclohexanone and aqueous sodium acetate as a function of pH. Determination of uroporphyrin and of hydrophilic porphyrin conjugates. Biochem J 2010; 105:1085-90. [PMID: 16742534 PMCID: PMC1198429 DOI: 10.1042/bj1051085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
1. The partition of uroporphyrins I and III, coproporphyrins I and III, haematoporphyrin IX, porphyrin c and a hydrophilic porphyrin-peptide fraction from variegate-porphyria faeces has been studied in systems of equal volumes of cyclohexanone and sodium acetate buffers of varying pH and concentration. 2. The concentration of acetate in the aqueous phase has little effect on the partition of porphyrin c, but markedly influences that of uroporphyrin. At 50% acetate saturation and pH4.5, only 5% enters the cyclohexanone phase whereas 60% of porphyrin c is extracted under similar conditions. 3. This circumstance forms the basis of a method for the determination of hydrophilic porphyrin-peptides in variegate-porphyria urine. Its reliability has been checked in model experiments. 4. At pH1.5 and an aqueous phase half-saturated with sodium acetate, an equal volume of cyclohexanone removes 95-97% of uroporphyrin and about 55% of porphyrin c. Uroporphyrin may therefore be determined as a second step in the method. 5. For the routine determination of uroporphyrin in systems free from other hydrophilic porphyrins, cyclohexanone extraction may be performed at any pH in the range 1.0-3.0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Rimington
- Department of Chemical Pathology, University College Hospital Medical School, London, W.C. 1
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Romanus D, Weiser M, TerVeer A, Skibber J, Wilson J, Rajput A, Wong Y, Benson A, Niland J, Schrag D. How often is adjuvant FOLFOX (Adj FOLFOX) discontinued for toxicity among colon cancer patients in the routine care setting? J Clin Oncol 2009. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.9530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
9530 Background: Although 12 cycles of Adj FOLFOX are recommended for stage III and high risk stage II colon cancer, toxicity may preclude completion of treatment. We used the NCCN Colorectal Cancer Outcomes Database to identify how frequently Adj FOLFOX is discontinued prematurely for toxicity in a non-clinical trial population. Methods: Newly diagnosed stage II-III colon cancer pts treated with Adj FOLFOX at 7 NCI-designated comprehensive cancer centers between 9/05–12/07 were identified. We assessed completion of the prescribed adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) course, including Adj FOLFOX and 5FU-based adjuvant treatment alone subsequent to discontinuation of oxaliplatin (oxal). Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) of Adj FOLFOX was defined as premature discontinuation of Adj FOLFOX due to toxicity. We evaluated potential predictors of Adj FOLFOX DLT, including older age and history of diabetes in a multivariable logistic model controlling for stage and center. We measured the duration of Adj FOLFOX use in weeks, from first to last dose. Results: 293 pts began Adj FOLFOX. Pts who experienced DLT (40%) had a shorter duration of Adj FOLFOX and were less likely to complete AC, even after oxal was discontinued. The only significant predictor of experiencing a DLT was a history of diabetes. Conclusions: Our analysis of patients treated outside of a clinical trial demonstrated a notably high rate of discontinuation of Adj FOLFOX due to DLT, particularly in pts with diabetes. The results underscore the need for systematic assessment of toxicity especially among diabetics. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D. Romanus
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL
| | - M. Weiser
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL
| | - A. TerVeer
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL
| | - J. Skibber
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL
| | - J. Wilson
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL
| | - A. Rajput
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Y. Wong
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL
| | - A. Benson
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL
| | - J. Niland
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL
| | - D. Schrag
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Small W, Mulcahy M, Rademaker A, Benson A, Bentrem D, Talamonti M. A Phase II Trial of Weekly Gemcitabine and Bevacizumab in Combination with Abdominal Radiation Therapy in Patients with Localized Pancreatic Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.06.781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
41
|
Johnson P, Adelglass J, Rankin B, Sterling R, Keating K, Benson A, Pertel P. Acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis: time to symptom resolution and return to normal activities with moxifloxacin. Int J Clin Pract 2008; 62:1366-72. [PMID: 18671753 DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01518..x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This prospective, single-arm, open-label, multicentre phase IV (postmarketing surveillance) study determined time to resolution of key symptoms and return to normal activities in adults with acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis treated with moxifloxacin 400 mg qd for 10 days. The study also assessed whether responses to the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-16 (SNOT-16) questionnaire [not yet validated for acute bacterial sinusitis (ABS)] accurately reflect clinical findings in these patients. METHODS Adults with a clinical diagnosis of acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis with signs/symptoms present for > or = 7 but < 28 days took part. Patients were evaluated bacteriologically and clinically on day 1 (pretherapy), days 2-4 and 10-13 (test of cure), for bacterial presence and improvement/resolution of the signs/symptoms of acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis. They completed SNOT-16 and Activity Impairment Assessment questionnaires daily, before receiving moxifloxacin, until day 10. RESULTS In both the bacteriologically and clinically evaluable populations, over 85% of patients showed clinical improvement by day 2, rising to over 96% by day 4. Pretherapy, according to the SNOT-16 questionnaire, almost all of the bacteriologically evaluable patients reported facial pain/pressure but this proportion had fallen to below 50% by day 4. In the bacteriologically evaluable population, 32/42 (76%) patients reported an improvement in facial pain/pressure from the pretherapy visit to day 4. Of patients showing improvement, 50% improved from 'moderate-to-severe facial pain' at pretherapy to 'no problem' at day 4. At day 4, 45-50% of patients reported impairment of normal activities, compared with 79-88% pretherapy. CONCLUSIONS Moxifloxacin rapidly improves the signs and symptoms of acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis and results in clinical cure in most patients. Responses to the SNOT-16 questionnaire accurately reflected clinical assessments, indicating that when fully validated the SNOT-16 questionnaire may be a valuable tool for the assessment of patient outcomes in ABS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Johnson
- ENT Consultants of Winchester, Winchester, VA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Gan HK, Cher L, Benson A, Dowling A, Rosenthal M. A phase II trial of temolozomide in patients with untreated high grade oligodengroglial brain tumours. J Clin Oncol 2008. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2008.26.15_suppl.13005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
43
|
Lewandowski R, Ibrahim S, Mulcahy M, Benson A, Ryu R, Salem R. Abstract No. 33: Treatment of Neuroendocrine Liver Metastases with 90Y Radioembolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2008. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2007.12.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
|
44
|
Berger AC, Winter K, Hoffman J, Regine W, Abrams R, Safran H, Konski A, Benson A, MacDonald J, Willet C. Post-resection CA 19–9 predicts overall survival (OS) in patients treated with adjuvant chemoradiation: A secondary endpoint of RTOG 9704. J Clin Oncol 2007. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2007.25.18_suppl.4522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
4522 Background: CA 19–9 is an important tumor marker in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Several single institutional studies have demonstrated post-resection CA 19–9 to be an important prognostic factor. A secondary endpoint of RTOG 9704, a phase III adjuvant chemoradiation trial for pancreatic cancer, was to prospectively evaluate the ability of post-resectional CA 19–9 to predict survival. Methods: A total of 538 patients were accrued to this trial, of which 385 had evaluable CA 19–9 levels. These were analyzed using ELISA GI-MA kits provided by Diagnostic Products Corporation, a Siemens Company. CA 19–9 expression was analyzed as a dichotomized variable (<180 vs. =180). Cox proportional hazards models were utilized to characterize the contribution of CA 19–9 expression on OS. The following additional variables were included in the multivariate analysis: treatment, nodal involvement, tumor diameter (< or > 3cm), and margin status. Actuarial estimates for OS were calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Results: Most patients had CA 19–9 < 180 (n=220, 57%), while 34% were Lewis Antigen negative (unable to express CA 19–9) and 33 (9%) patients had levels >180. Survival was statistically significantly improved among patients with CA 19–9 <180 compared with those whose CA 19–9 =180 (HR=3.58(95% CI=2.40–5.34), p<0.0001) ( table ). This corresponds to a 72% reduction in the risk of death. This improvement was observed among patients with pancreas head and non-head tumors when analyzed separately. The multivariate analysis confirms that CA 19–9 is a highly significant predictor of OS in patients with resected pancreatic cancer. Conclusions: This prospective analysis of CA 19–9 in 385 patients treated with adjuvant chemoradiation definitively confirms the importance of post-resectional CA 19–9 in pancreatic cancer patients who have undergone resection. Patients with post-resection CA 19–9 >180 should be considered for additional therapy. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. C. Berger
- Thomas Jefferson Univ, Philadelphia, PA; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Philadelphia, PA; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD; Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Brown University, Providence, RI; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; St. Vincent’s Cancer Center, Castine, ME; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - K. Winter
- Thomas Jefferson Univ, Philadelphia, PA; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Philadelphia, PA; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD; Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Brown University, Providence, RI; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; St. Vincent’s Cancer Center, Castine, ME; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - J. Hoffman
- Thomas Jefferson Univ, Philadelphia, PA; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Philadelphia, PA; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD; Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Brown University, Providence, RI; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; St. Vincent’s Cancer Center, Castine, ME; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - W. Regine
- Thomas Jefferson Univ, Philadelphia, PA; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Philadelphia, PA; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD; Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Brown University, Providence, RI; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; St. Vincent’s Cancer Center, Castine, ME; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - R. Abrams
- Thomas Jefferson Univ, Philadelphia, PA; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Philadelphia, PA; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD; Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Brown University, Providence, RI; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; St. Vincent’s Cancer Center, Castine, ME; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - H. Safran
- Thomas Jefferson Univ, Philadelphia, PA; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Philadelphia, PA; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD; Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Brown University, Providence, RI; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; St. Vincent’s Cancer Center, Castine, ME; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - A. Konski
- Thomas Jefferson Univ, Philadelphia, PA; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Philadelphia, PA; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD; Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Brown University, Providence, RI; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; St. Vincent’s Cancer Center, Castine, ME; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - A. Benson
- Thomas Jefferson Univ, Philadelphia, PA; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Philadelphia, PA; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD; Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Brown University, Providence, RI; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; St. Vincent’s Cancer Center, Castine, ME; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - J. MacDonald
- Thomas Jefferson Univ, Philadelphia, PA; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Philadelphia, PA; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD; Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Brown University, Providence, RI; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; St. Vincent’s Cancer Center, Castine, ME; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - C. Willet
- Thomas Jefferson Univ, Philadelphia, PA; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Philadelphia, PA; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD; Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Brown University, Providence, RI; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; St. Vincent’s Cancer Center, Castine, ME; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Hynes DM, Tarlov E, Perrin R, Zhang Q, Bennett C, Ferreira M, Lee T, Benson A. Patterns of care among veterans with colon cancer: Insights from California SEER, Medicare and VA-linked data. J Clin Oncol 2007. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2007.25.18_suppl.6586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
6586 Background: U.S. veterans have been shown to be a vulnerable population with high cancer rates, yet practice pattern information is lacking. Linkage of cancer registry, Medicare, and VA data provides a more complete view of health status and healthcare received among veterans with cancer. Methods: As part of a national study, a retrospective cohort of incident colon cancer patients from the California Cancer Registry data, who were = 66 years old and eligible to use VA and Medicare between 1999 and 2001, were followed for three years through 2004. We examined practice patterns for stages I-IV colon cancer, specifically, surgery and use of chemotherapy, and trends in one-year mortality using descriptive and multivariate regression models. Results: Among 633 veterans with colon cancer, 93% were male; 16% were African American; 28% were diagnosed at a VA facility compared to 72% at a Medicare facility, and 553 (87%) had colectomy. One year mortality rate was 29%. Among the 553 colectomy patients, prevalence of chemotherapy use, according to stage was 8%, 27%, 61% and 52% for stages I-IV, respectively (p-value <0.0001). Regression analyses of factors affecting whether chemotherapy was received revealed that Stage III patients were most likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy (Odds Ratio (OR) 19.80, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 9.68–40.50). However stage II and stage IV patients were also highly likely to receive chemotherapy following surgery (OR: 4.41 CI: 2.18–8.91 and OR: 13.21; CI: 6.01–29, respectively). Patients =76 years and those =86 years were less likely to receive chemotherapy following surgery (OR: 0.61, CI: 0.40–0.94 and OR: 0.25, CI: 0.094–0.64, respectively) compared to patients 66–75 years. Patients with Charlson Comorbidity Score of 2 or greater were less likely to receive chemotherapy (OR: 0.49; CI: 0.29–0.84). Treating facility (VA or Medicare), did not affect chemotherapy use. Conclusions: Among veterans with colon cancer in California, older patients were less likely to receive chemotherapy even when stage and comorbidity status were considered. Efforts focused on improving guideline consistent adjuvant chemotherapy use among older veterans with stage III colon cancer across treating facilities may yield the greatest benefit. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D. M. Hynes
- Edward Hines, Jr VA Hospital, Hines, IL; Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - E. Tarlov
- Edward Hines, Jr VA Hospital, Hines, IL; Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - R. Perrin
- Edward Hines, Jr VA Hospital, Hines, IL; Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Q. Zhang
- Edward Hines, Jr VA Hospital, Hines, IL; Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - C. Bennett
- Edward Hines, Jr VA Hospital, Hines, IL; Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - M. Ferreira
- Edward Hines, Jr VA Hospital, Hines, IL; Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - T. Lee
- Edward Hines, Jr VA Hospital, Hines, IL; Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - A. Benson
- Edward Hines, Jr VA Hospital, Hines, IL; Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Small W, Mulcahy M, Benson A, Gold S, Bredesen R, Rademaker F, Talamonti M. A phase II trial of weekly gemcitabine and bevacizumab in combination with abdominal radiation therapy in patients with localized pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 2007. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2007.25.18_suppl.15043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
15043 Purpose: To evaluate the response rate, survival and toxicity of non-metastatic pancreatic cancer patients treated with a combination of, Gemcitabine, Bevacizumab and Radiotherapy. Materials and Methods: Eligibility included patients with non- metastatic pancreatic cancer, standard organ function and ECOG performance status of 0 or 1. The patients received three cycles of therapy. Cycle one was 21 days and consisted of Gemcitabine days 1 and 8 and Bevacizumab days 1 and 15. Cycle 2 was 28 days and consisted of Gemcitabine days 1, 8, and 15, Bevacizumab days 8 and 22 and Radiotherapy days 1–5, 8–12, and 15–19. Cycle three was 21 days and delivered Gemcitabine days 1 and 8, and Bevacizumab day 8. The Gemcitabine dose was 1,000 mg/m2, Bevacizumab at 10 mg/kg and Radiotherapy was delivered to the gross tumor volume only for a total dose of 36 Gy at 2.4 Gy/fraction. Response was determined on week ten with cross sectional imaging and CA 19–9. Toxicities were scored utilizing CTC version 3.0. Resectable patients were to undergo surgery 8 (currently amended to 6) weeks after the last dose of Bevacizumab. Results: Ninteen patients have been enrolled on study from 10/10/05 - 1/4/07. Twelve patients are evaluable for toxicity and response. Ten (83%) had a grade 3 toxicity. The grade 3 toxicities included cytopenias (9), DVT (2), Dehydration (2), hypotension (1), mucositis (1), increased LFT’s (2), Anorexia (1), nausea (1) and fatigue (1).There were no Grade 4 or 5 toxicities. All but one patient completed all three cycles. Radiographic response at 10 weeks was noted to be stable in 10 (83%) patients. Two patients progressed distantly (liver and abdomen). The mean CA 19–9 pre and post treatment CA 19–9 was 1519.56 and 356.09 respectively. One patient underwent surgical resection. The mean follow up is 4.83 months. At last follow up nine patients were alive. Conclusions: The combination of full dose Gemcitabine, Bevacizumab and Radiotherapy was generally well tolerated with no Grade 4 toxicities and the majority of Grade 3 toxicities hematologic. All but one patient completed all three cycles. Responses were limited to a reduction in CA 19–9. Nine patients remain alive. Accrual to the trial continues. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W. Small
- Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | | | - A. Benson
- Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - S. Gold
- Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Van Cutsem E, Dicato M, Arber N, Benson A, Cunningham D, Diaz-Rubio E, Glimelius B, Goldberg R, Haller D, Haustermans K, Koo-Kang Y, Labianca R, Lang I, Minsky B, Nordlinger B, Roth A, Rougier P, Schmoll HJ, Sobrero A, Tabernero J, Szawlowski A, van de Velde C. The neo-adjuvant, surgical and adjuvant treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma. Current expert opinion derived from the Seventh World Congress on Gastrointestinal Cancer, Barcelona, 2005. Ann Oncol 2006; 17 Suppl 6:vi13-8. [PMID: 16809641 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdl976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- E Van Cutsem
- University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Makarova K, Slesarev A, Wolf Y, Sorokin A, Mirkin B, Koonin E, Pavlov A, Pavlova N, Karamychev V, Polouchine N, Shakhova V, Grigoriev I, Lou Y, Rohksar D, Lucas S, Huang K, Goodstein DM, Hawkins T, Plengvidhya V, Welker D, Hughes J, Goh Y, Benson A, Baldwin K, Lee JH, Díaz-Muñiz I, Dosti B, Smeianov V, Wechter W, Barabote R, Lorca G, Altermann E, Barrangou R, Ganesan B, Xie Y, Rawsthorne H, Tamir D, Parker C, Breidt F, Broadbent J, Hutkins R, O'Sullivan D, Steele J, Unlu G, Saier M, Klaenhammer T, Richardson P, Kozyavkin S, Weimer B, Mills D. Comparative genomics of the lactic acid bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103:15611-6. [PMID: 17030793 PMCID: PMC1622870 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0607117103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 944] [Impact Index Per Article: 52.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Lactic acid-producing bacteria are associated with various plant and animal niches and play a key role in the production of fermented foods and beverages. We report nine genome sequences representing the phylogenetic and functional diversity of these bacteria. The small genomes of lactic acid bacteria encode a broad repertoire of transporters for efficient carbon and nitrogen acquisition from the nutritionally rich environments they inhabit and reflect a limited range of biosynthetic capabilities that indicate both prototrophic and auxotrophic strains. Phylogenetic analyses, comparison of gene content across the group, and reconstruction of ancestral gene sets indicate a combination of extensive gene loss and key gene acquisitions via horizontal gene transfer during the coevolution of lactic acid bacteria with their habitats.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K. Makarova
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894
| | - A. Slesarev
- Fidelity Systems Inc., 7961 Cessna Avenue, Gaithersburg, MD 20879
| | - Y. Wolf
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894
| | - A. Sorokin
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894
| | - B. Mirkin
- School of Information Systems and Computer Science, Birkbeck College, University of London, Malet Street, London WC1E 7HX, United Kingdom
| | - E. Koonin
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894
- To whom correspondence may be addressed. E-mail:
, , , or
| | - A. Pavlov
- Fidelity Systems Inc., 7961 Cessna Avenue, Gaithersburg, MD 20879
| | - N. Pavlova
- Fidelity Systems Inc., 7961 Cessna Avenue, Gaithersburg, MD 20879
| | - V. Karamychev
- Fidelity Systems Inc., 7961 Cessna Avenue, Gaithersburg, MD 20879
| | - N. Polouchine
- Fidelity Systems Inc., 7961 Cessna Avenue, Gaithersburg, MD 20879
| | - V. Shakhova
- Fidelity Systems Inc., 7961 Cessna Avenue, Gaithersburg, MD 20879
| | - I. Grigoriev
- U.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, 2800 Mitchell Drive, Walnut Creek, CA 94598
| | - Y. Lou
- U.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, 2800 Mitchell Drive, Walnut Creek, CA 94598
| | - D. Rohksar
- U.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, 2800 Mitchell Drive, Walnut Creek, CA 94598
| | - S. Lucas
- U.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, 2800 Mitchell Drive, Walnut Creek, CA 94598
| | - K. Huang
- U.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, 2800 Mitchell Drive, Walnut Creek, CA 94598
| | - D. M. Goodstein
- U.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, 2800 Mitchell Drive, Walnut Creek, CA 94598
| | - T. Hawkins
- U.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, 2800 Mitchell Drive, Walnut Creek, CA 94598
| | - V. Plengvidhya
- Department of Food Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
- North Carolina Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Raleigh, NC 27695; Departments of
| | | | | | - Y. Goh
- Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583
| | - A. Benson
- Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583
| | - K. Baldwin
- Department of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
| | - J.-H. Lee
- Department of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
| | - I. Díaz-Muñiz
- Department of Food Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
| | - B. Dosti
- Department of Food Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
| | - V. Smeianov
- Department of Food Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
| | - W. Wechter
- Department of Food Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
| | - R. Barabote
- Department of Biology, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093
| | - G. Lorca
- Department of Biology, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093
| | - E. Altermann
- Department of Food Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
| | - R. Barrangou
- Department of Food Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
| | - B. Ganesan
- Center for Integrated BioSystems, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322
| | - Y. Xie
- Nutrition and Food Science and
- Center for Integrated BioSystems, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322
| | - H. Rawsthorne
- Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616; and
| | | | | | - F. Breidt
- Department of Food Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
- North Carolina Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Raleigh, NC 27695; Departments of
| | | | - R. Hutkins
- Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583
| | - D. O'Sullivan
- Department of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
| | - J. Steele
- Department of Food Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
| | - G. Unlu
- Department of Food Science and Toxicology, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844
| | - M. Saier
- Department of Biology, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093
| | - T. Klaenhammer
- Department of Food Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
- To whom correspondence may be addressed. E-mail:
, , , or
| | - P. Richardson
- U.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, 2800 Mitchell Drive, Walnut Creek, CA 94598
| | - S. Kozyavkin
- Fidelity Systems Inc., 7961 Cessna Avenue, Gaithersburg, MD 20879
| | - B. Weimer
- Nutrition and Food Science and
- Center for Integrated BioSystems, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322
- To whom correspondence may be addressed. E-mail:
, , , or
| | - D. Mills
- Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616; and
- To whom correspondence may be addressed. E-mail:
, , , or
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Liebes L, Levy DE, Poplin E, Mendoza S, Fry D, Buckley M, Zoloratov A, Benson A, Hochster H. Gemcitabine (G) plamsa and intracellular pharmacokinetics in E6201: Greater metabolite levels using fixed dosing rate (FDR) delivery. J Clin Oncol 2006. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.2024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
2024 Background: Gemcitabine (G) is an antimetabolite which requires activation by the rate-limiting enzyme dCK to its active metabolite, dFdCTP. FDR delivery of G at 10 mg/m2/minute may allow greater formation of active metabolite and improved activity. E6201 randomly assigned first line pancreatic cancer patients to three arms: A (G 1000 mg/m2 over 30 minutes), B FDR G (1500 mg/m2 over 150 minutes), and C GemOx (1000 mg/m2 over 100 minutes with oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2). Methods: Investigators from 18 centers contributed 23 sample sets on the first dose of G. Five time points over 4 hrs were sampled (baseline, mid infusion, end infusion, 1–2 post and 4 hrs). Plasma fractionation along with the PBMC purification and subsequent perchloric acid extraction were conducted locally with THU 1 mg (cytidine deaminase inhibitor). Samples were shipped overnight to the central lab where G and its metabolite dFdU were quantified from deproteinized plasma by reverse phase HPLC. dFdCTP was quantified by ion-exchange HPLC in neutralized PBMC extracts after removal of ribonucleotide triphosphates. Data were fit to nonlinear models (WinNonLin, v4.1) and comparisons amongst dosing groups employed the non-parametric, 2-sided Mann-Whitney test. Results: For Arms A, B and C the plasma AUCs were respectively (median ± SD): 4542 ± 2472 (N=9), 8603 ± 2608 (N=8) and 9130 ± 8788 (N=6) ng/ml x hr. The difference between group A and B (p=0.003) and A and C (p=0.05) were statistically different. Intracellular dFdCTP AUCs for groups A, B, and C were: 1862 ± 794 (N=8); 3725 ± 7763 (N=8) and 5024 ± 2113 (N=5) and significantly different for both A vs. B (p=0.05) and borderline significant for A vs C (p=0.065). The latter comparison is limited by a small number of samples. Conclusions: When studied in a multi-centered, randomized cooperative group setting, FDR delivery of G results in higher plasma AUC, and increased intracellular levels of active metabolite dFdCTP. These data support the concept that fixed dose rate delivery of G results in greater intracellular metabolite production at similar and equitoxic doses. Supported by ECOG NYU620HH04–00, NCI CA16087, CA2115, and from Eli Lilly. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L. Liebes
- New York University Medical Center, New York, NY; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - D. E. Levy
- New York University Medical Center, New York, NY; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - E. Poplin
- New York University Medical Center, New York, NY; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - S. Mendoza
- New York University Medical Center, New York, NY; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - D. Fry
- New York University Medical Center, New York, NY; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - M. Buckley
- New York University Medical Center, New York, NY; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - A. Zoloratov
- New York University Medical Center, New York, NY; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - A. Benson
- New York University Medical Center, New York, NY; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - H. Hochster
- New York University Medical Center, New York, NY; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Poplin E, Levy DE, Berlin J, Rothenberg ML, O’Dwyer PJ, Cella D, Mitchell E, Alberts S, Benson A. Phase III trial of gemcitabine (30-minute infusion) versus gemcitabine (fixed-dose-rate infusion [FDR]) versus gemcitabine + oxaliplatin (GEMOX) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (E6201). J Clin Oncol 2006. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.lba4004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
LBA4004 Background: Gemcitabine (GEM) is the cornerstone of treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer (PANCA). FDR GEM or GEMOX are promising, but have yet to convincingly demonstrate a survival advantage over GEM alone. E6201 compares overall survival (OS) of standard GEM 1000 mg/m2/30 min wkly ×7 over 56 days then wkly ×3 q28 d (ARM A) vs. FDR GEM 1500 mg/m2/150 min wkly ×3 q28 days (ARM B) or GEM 1000 mg/m2/100-min/d1 + oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2/d2 q14d (ARM C). Secondary endpoints are the comparison of the experimental regimens, toxicity, response, patterns of failure, progression-free survival and quality-of-life. Methods: This multi-institutional trial included patients (pts) with measurable and non-measurable advanced, unresectable PAN CA, normal organ function and PS 0–2. Pts were chemonaive, although prior adjuvant radiosensitizing 5FU was permitted. Pts were stratified by PS 0–1 vs 2 and locally advanced vs metastatic disease The study was designed to detect a 33% difference in median survival (hazard ratio 1.33) with 81% power while maintaining a significance level of 2.5% in a two-sided test for each of the two primary comparisons, assuming exponential failure and median survival of 6 mo for Arm A and 8 mo for Arm B and C (N = 750 eligible). Results: Accrual started in 3/03 and completed in 3/05. Median follow up is 5.8 mo. 833 pts (53% men; 88% PS 0–1; 88% metastatic), were randomized with 280, 277 and 276 pts in Arms A, B and C. The third interim analysis was conducted with 89.5% information on 3/2006. The predominant toxicity, available for 758 pts, was grade 3/4 myelosuppression and fatigue. Two deaths from ARDS and infection occurred. Median OS for ARMS A, B, and C are 4.96, 6.01 and 6.47 months, respectively. Hazard ratio A vs B is 1.21 with stratified log rank of 0.053 and for A vs C is 1.22 with stratified log rank of 0.045, neither statistically significant. Conclusion: E6201 final OS results will be available in June, 2006. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E. Poplin
- Cancer Institute of New Jersey/UMDNJ, New Brunswick, NJ; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Evanston Northwestern Healthcare, Evanston, IL; Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - D. E. Levy
- Cancer Institute of New Jersey/UMDNJ, New Brunswick, NJ; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Evanston Northwestern Healthcare, Evanston, IL; Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - J. Berlin
- Cancer Institute of New Jersey/UMDNJ, New Brunswick, NJ; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Evanston Northwestern Healthcare, Evanston, IL; Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - M. L. Rothenberg
- Cancer Institute of New Jersey/UMDNJ, New Brunswick, NJ; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Evanston Northwestern Healthcare, Evanston, IL; Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - P. J. O’Dwyer
- Cancer Institute of New Jersey/UMDNJ, New Brunswick, NJ; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Evanston Northwestern Healthcare, Evanston, IL; Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - D. Cella
- Cancer Institute of New Jersey/UMDNJ, New Brunswick, NJ; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Evanston Northwestern Healthcare, Evanston, IL; Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - E. Mitchell
- Cancer Institute of New Jersey/UMDNJ, New Brunswick, NJ; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Evanston Northwestern Healthcare, Evanston, IL; Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - S. Alberts
- Cancer Institute of New Jersey/UMDNJ, New Brunswick, NJ; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Evanston Northwestern Healthcare, Evanston, IL; Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - A. Benson
- Cancer Institute of New Jersey/UMDNJ, New Brunswick, NJ; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Evanston Northwestern Healthcare, Evanston, IL; Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|