Diverse roles of low-molecular weight thiol GSH in Francisella's virulence, location sensing and GSH-stealing from host

Low-molecular weight (LMW) thiols, encompassing peptides and small proteins with active cysteine residue(s), are important to bacteria as they are involved in a wide range of redox reactions. They include the tripeptide glutathione (GSH) and the small redox proteins, thioredoxins and glutaredoxins. We review the low MW thiols and related molecules in Francisella species and what role they may play in growth and virulence. Genes for GSH biosynthesis, metabolism and thioredoxins are present in all strains of Francisella, including the fully human-virulent strains. GSH and cysteine (CSH) are the major LMW thiols in Francisella extracts. We explore the potential role of the LMW thiols to overcome the nutritional challenges of intracellular growth (high GSH conditions) as well as the nutritional challenges of planktonic growth (low GSH conditions), and their contribution to Francisella's sensing its environmental location. Francisella may also use GSH as a source of CSH, for which it is auxotrophic. "Glutathione stealing" from the host may be an important part of Francisella's success strategy as a facultative intracellular pathogen both to detect its location and obtain CSH. An understanding of GSH metabolism in Francisella provides insights into the interaction of this pathogen with its host and may reveal additional targets for therapeutic intervention for tularemia infections.

Glycogen turnover and anaplerosis in preconditioned rat hearts

Using (13)C NMR, we tested the hypothesis that protection by preconditioning is associated with reduced glycogenolysis during ischemia. Preconditioned rat hearts showed improved postischemic function and reduced ischemic damage relative to ischemic controls after 30 min stop-flow ischemia and 30 min reperfusion (contractility: 30+/-10 vs. 2+/-2%; creatine kinase release: 41+/-4 vs. 83+/-15 U/g; both P<0.05). Preconditioning decreased preischemic [(13)C]glycogen by 24% (a 10% decrease in total glycogen), and delayed ischemic [(13)C]glycogen consumption by 5-10 min, reducing ischemic glycogenolysis without changing acidosis relative to controls. Upon reperfusion, glycogen synthesis resumed only after preconditioning. Glutamate (13)C-isotopomer analysis showed recovery of Krebs cycle activity with higher anaplerosis than before ischemia (23+/-4 vs. 11+/-3%, P<0.05), but in controls reperfusion failed to restore flux. Compared to control, preconditioning before 20 min ischemia increased contractility (86+/-10 vs. 29+/-14%, P<0.05) and restored preischemic anaplerosis (13+/-3 vs. 39+/-9%, P<0.05). Preconditioning is associated with reduced glycogenolysis early during ischemia. However, protection does not rely on major variations in intracellular pH, as proposed earlier. Our isotopomer data suggest that preconditioning accelerates metabolic and functional recovery during reperfusion by more efficient/active replenishment of the depleted Krebs cycle.

Controversies in preconditioning

Preconditioning is an effective mean of protecting the heart against prolonged ischemia by pretreating it with a minor insult, and the present paper reviews various controversies in this highly active field of research. In many models, adenosine plays a role by triggering the activation of protein kinase C. It may work in conjunction with other agents, such as bradykinin, but the putative role of noradrenaline is uncertain. Regulation of the enzyme producing adenosine (i.e., 5'-nucleotidase) has been reported during preconditioning but, because its activity does not seem to be associated with infarct size, it is unlikely that the hydrolase plays a pivotal role. Controversial data have been published on the involvement of mitochondrial ATPase, which may be ascribed to the poor time resolution of the experiments described; however, we do not believe that either acidosis or tissue ATP are important factors in triggering preconditioning. The role of glycolysis in the preconditioning effect remains to be firmly established; opposite mechanisms are activated in low-flow and stop-flow protocols. Although species differences regarding preconditioning exist, they seem to be more of a quantitative than a qualitative nature. The phenomenon could be clinically relevant because evidence is accumulating that preconditioning may take place during bypass surgery and coronary angioplasty if longer balloon-occlusion times are used.