1
|
Vandekerkhove G, Giri VN, Halabi S, McNair C, Hamade K, Bitting RL, Wyatt AW. Toward Informed Selection and Interpretation of Clinical Genomic Tests in Prostate Cancer. JCO Precis Oncol 2024; 8:e2300654. [PMID: 38547422 PMCID: PMC10994438 DOI: 10.1200/po.23.00654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2023] [Revised: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Clinical genomic testing of patient germline, tumor tissue, or plasma cell-free DNA can enable a personalized approach to cancer management and treatment. In prostate cancer (PCa), broad genotyping tests are now widely used to identify germline and/or somatic alterations in BRCA2 and other DNA damage repair genes. Alterations in these genes can confer cancer sensitivity to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, are linked with poor prognosis, and can have potential hereditary cancer implications for family members. However, there is huge variability in genomic tests and reporting standards, meaning that for successful implementation of testing in clinical practice, end users must carefully select the most appropriate test for a given patient and critically interpret the results. In this white paper, we outline key pre- and post-test considerations for choosing a genomic test and evaluating reported variants, specifically for patients with advanced PCa. Test choice must be based on clinical context and disease state, availability and suitability of tumor tissue, and the genes and regions that are covered by the test. We describe strategies to recognize false positives or negatives in test results, including frameworks to assess low tumor fraction, subclonal alterations, clonal hematopoiesis, and pathogenic versus nonpathogenic variants. We assume that improved understanding among health care professionals and researchers of the nuances associated with genomic testing will ultimately lead to optimal patient care and clinical decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gillian Vandekerkhove
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Veda N. Giri
- Yale School of Medicine and Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT
| | | | | | | | | | - Alexander W. Wyatt
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fonseca NM, Maurice-Dror C, Herberts C, Tu W, Fan W, Murtha AJ, Kollmannsberger C, Kwan EM, Parekh K, Schönlau E, Bernales CQ, Donnellan G, Ng SWS, Sumiyoshi T, Vergidis J, Noonan K, Finch DL, Zulfiqar M, Miller S, Parimi S, Lavoie JM, Hardy E, Soleimani M, Nappi L, Eigl BJ, Kollmannsberger C, Taavitsainen S, Nykter M, Tolmeijer SH, Boerrigter E, Mehra N, van Erp NP, De Laere B, Lindberg J, Grönberg H, Khalaf DJ, Annala M, Chi KN, Wyatt AW. Prediction of plasma ctDNA fraction and prognostic implications of liquid biopsy in advanced prostate cancer. Nat Commun 2024; 15:1828. [PMID: 38418825 PMCID: PMC10902374 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-45475-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
No consensus strategies exist for prognosticating metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Circulating tumor DNA fraction (ctDNA%) is increasingly reported by commercial and laboratory tests but its utility for risk stratification is unclear. Here, we intersect ctDNA%, treatment outcomes, and clinical characteristics across 738 plasma samples from 491 male mCRPC patients from two randomized multicentre phase II trials and a prospective province-wide blood biobanking program. ctDNA% correlates with serum and radiographic metrics of disease burden and is highest in patients with liver metastases. ctDNA% strongly predicts overall survival, progression-free survival, and treatment response independent of therapeutic context and outperformed established prognostic clinical factors. Recognizing that ctDNA-based biomarker genotyping is limited by low ctDNA% in some patients, we leverage the relationship between clinical prognostic factors and ctDNA% to develop a clinically-interpretable machine-learning tool that predicts whether a patient has sufficient ctDNA% for informative ctDNA genotyping (available online: https://www.ctDNA.org ). Our results affirm ctDNA% as an actionable tool for patient risk stratification and provide a practical framework for optimized biomarker testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolette M Fonseca
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Cameron Herberts
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Wilson Tu
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - William Fan
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Andrew J Murtha
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Edmond M Kwan
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences; Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Karan Parekh
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Elena Schönlau
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Cecily Q Bernales
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Gráinne Donnellan
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Sarah W S Ng
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Takayuki Sumiyoshi
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Joanna Vergidis
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | - Krista Noonan
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Surrey, BC, Canada
| | - Daygen L Finch
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Kelowna, BC, Canada
| | | | - Stacy Miller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer, Prince George, BC, Canada
| | - Sunil Parimi
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Edward Hardy
- Tom McMurtry & Peter Baerg Cancer Centre, Vernon Jubilee Hospital, Vernon, BC, Canada
| | - Maryam Soleimani
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Lucia Nappi
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Bernhard J Eigl
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Sinja Taavitsainen
- Prostate Cancer Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere, Finland
| | - Matti Nykter
- Prostate Cancer Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere, Finland
| | - Sofie H Tolmeijer
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Medical Oncology, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Emmy Boerrigter
- Department of Pharmacy, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Niven Mehra
- Department of Medical Oncology, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Nielka P van Erp
- Department of Pharmacy, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Bram De Laere
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Johan Lindberg
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Henrik Grönberg
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Daniel J Khalaf
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Matti Annala
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
- Prostate Cancer Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere, Finland.
| | - Kim N Chi
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| | - Alexander W Wyatt
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
- Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sumiyoshi T, Wang X, Warner EW, Sboner A, Annala M, Sigouros M, Beja K, Mizuno K, Ku S, Fazli L, Eastham J, Taplin ME, Simko J, Halabi S, Morris MJ, Gleave ME, Wyatt AW, Beltran H. Molecular features of prostate cancer after neoadjuvant therapy in the phase 3 CALGB 90203 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2024; 116:115-126. [PMID: 37676819 PMCID: PMC10777679 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djad184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Revised: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The phase 3 CALGB 90203 (Alliance) trial evaluated neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy for high-risk localized prostate cancer before radical prostatectomy. We dissected the molecular features of post-treated tumors with long-term clinical outcomes to explore mechanisms of response and resistance to chemohormonal therapy. METHODS We evaluated 471 radical prostatectomy tumors, including 294 samples from 166 patients treated with 6 cycles of docetaxel plus androgen deprivation therapy before radical prostatectomy and 177 samples from 97 patients in the control arm (radical prostatectomy alone). Targeted DNA sequencing and RNA expression of tumor foci and adjacent noncancer regions were analyzed in conjunction with pathologic changes and clinical outcomes. RESULTS Tumor fraction estimated from DNA sequencing was significantly lower in post-treated tumor tissues after chemohormonal therapy compared with controls. Higher tumor fraction after chemohormonal therapy was associated with aggressive pathologic features and poor outcomes, including prostate-specific antigen-progression-free survival. SPOP alterations were infrequently detected after chemohormonal therapy, while TP53 alterations were enriched and associated with shorter overall survival. Residual tumor fraction after chemohormonal therapy was linked to higher expression of androgen receptor-regulated genes, cell cycle genes, and neuroendocrine genes, suggesting persistent populations of active prostate cancer cells. Supervised clustering of post-treated high-tumor-fraction tissues identified a group of patients with elevated cell cycle-related gene expression and poor clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Distinct recurrent prostate cancer genomic and transcriptomic features are observed after exposure to docetaxel and androgen deprivation therapy. Tumor fraction assessed by DNA sequencing quantifies pathologic response and could be a useful trial endpoint or prognostic biomarker. TP53 alterations and high cell cycle transcriptomic activity are linked to aggressive residual disease, despite potent chemohormonal therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takayuki Sumiyoshi
- Vancouver Prostate Centre and Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Xiaofei Wang
- Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Evan W Warner
- Vancouver Prostate Centre and Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Andrea Sboner
- Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Matti Annala
- Vancouver Prostate Centre and Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Michael Sigouros
- Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kevin Beja
- Vancouver Prostate Centre and Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Kei Mizuno
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shengyu Ku
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ladan Fazli
- Vancouver Prostate Centre and Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - James Eastham
- Urology Service at the Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mary-Ellen Taplin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jeffrey Simko
- Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Susan Halabi
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Michael J Morris
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Martin E Gleave
- Vancouver Prostate Centre and Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Alexander W Wyatt
- Vancouver Prostate Centre and Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Himisha Beltran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhao JL, Antonarakis ES, Cheng HH, George DJ, Aggarwal R, Riedel E, Sumiyoshi T, Schonhoft JD, Anderson A, Mao N, Haywood S, Decker B, Curley T, Abida W, Feng FY, Knudsen K, Carver B, Lacouture ME, Wyatt AW, Rathkopf D. Phase 1b study of enzalutamide plus CC-115, a dual mTORC1/2 and DNA-PK inhibitor, in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Br J Cancer 2024; 130:53-62. [PMID: 37980367 PMCID: PMC10781677 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02487-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Revised: 10/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 11/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND CC-115, a dual mTORC1/2 and DNA-PK inhibitor, has promising antitumour activity when combined with androgen receptor (AR) inhibition in pre-clinical models. METHODS Phase 1b multicentre trial evaluating enzalutamide with escalating doses of CC-115 in AR inhibitor-naive mCRPC patients (n = 41). Primary endpoints were safety and RP2D. Secondary endpoints included PSA response, time-to-PSA progression, and radiographic progression. RESULTS Common adverse effects included rash (31.7% Grades 1-2 (Gr); 31.7% Gr 3), pruritis (43.9% Gr 1-2), diarrhoea (37% Gr 1-2), and hypertension (17% Gr 1-2; 9.8% Gr 3). CC-115 RP2D was 5 mg twice a day. In 40 evaluable patients, 80% achieved ≥50% reduction in PSA (PSA50), and 58% achieved ≥90% reduction in PSA (PSA90) by 12 weeks. Median time-to-PSA progression was 14.7 months and median rPFS was 22.1 months. Stratification by PI3K alterations demonstrated a non-statistically significant trend towards improved PSA50 response (PSA50 of 94% vs. 67%, p = 0.08). Exploratory pre-clinical analysis suggested CC-115 inhibited mTOR pathway strongly, but may be insufficient to inhibit DNA-PK at RP2D. CONCLUSIONS The combination of enzalutamide and CC-115 was well tolerated. A non-statistically significant trend towards improved PSA response was observed in patients harbouring PI3K pathway alterations, suggesting potential predictive biomarkers of response to a PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway inhibitor. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02833883.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jimmy L Zhao
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
- University of Minnesota Masonic Cancer Center, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Emmanuel S Antonarakis
- The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, 401 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21231, USA
- R&D in Oncology, AstraZeneca, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Heather H Cheng
- University of Washington and Fred Hutch Cancer Research Center, 1144 Eastlake Avenue, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA
| | - Daniel J George
- Duke Cancer Institute, 20 Duke Medicine Circle, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Rahul Aggarwal
- University of California, San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1825 4th Street, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Elyn Riedel
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Takayuki Sumiyoshi
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Amanda Anderson
- Epic Sciences, 9381 Judicial Drive Suite 200, San Diego, CA, 92121, USA
| | - Ninghui Mao
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Samuel Haywood
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Brooke Decker
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Tracy Curley
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Wassim Abida
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Felix Y Feng
- University of California, San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1825 4th Street, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Karen Knudsen
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, 914 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Brett Carver
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Mario E Lacouture
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Alexander W Wyatt
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Dana Rathkopf
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Warner EW, Van der Eecken K, Murtha AJ, Kwan EM, Herberts C, Sipola J, Ng SWS, Chen XE, Fonseca NM, Ritch E, Schönlau E, Bernales CQ, Donnellan G, Munzur AD, Parekh K, Beja K, Wong A, Verbeke S, Lumen N, Van Dorpe J, De Laere B, Annala M, Vandekerkhove G, Ost P, Wyatt AW. Multiregion sampling of de novo metastatic prostate cancer reveals complex polyclonality and augments clinical genotyping. Nat Cancer 2024; 5:114-130. [PMID: 38177459 DOI: 10.1038/s43018-023-00692-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024]
Abstract
De novo metastatic prostate cancer is highly aggressive, but the paucity of routinely collected tissue has hindered genomic stratification and precision oncology. Here, we leveraged a rare study of surgical intervention in 43 de novo metastatic prostate cancers to assess somatic genotypes across 607 synchronous primary and metastatic tissue regions plus circulating tumor DNA. Intra-prostate heterogeneity was pervasive and impacted clinically relevant genes, resulting in discordant genotypes between select primary restricted regions and synchronous metastases. Additional complexity was driven by polyclonal metastatic seeding from phylogenetically related primary populations. When simulating clinical practice relying on a single tissue region, genomic heterogeneity plus variable tumor fraction across samples caused inaccurate genotyping of dominant disease; however, pooling extracted DNA from multiple biopsy cores before sequencing can rescue misassigned somatic genotypes. Our results define the relationship between synchronous treatment-sensitive primary and metastatic lesions in men with de novo metastatic prostate cancer and provide a framework for implementing genomics-guided patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan W Warner
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Kim Van der Eecken
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Andrew J Murtha
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Edmond M Kwan
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Cameron Herberts
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Joonatan Sipola
- Prostate Cancer Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere, Finland
| | - Sarah W S Ng
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Xinyi E Chen
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Nicolette M Fonseca
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Elie Ritch
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Elena Schönlau
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Cecily Q Bernales
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Gráinne Donnellan
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Aslı D Munzur
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Karan Parekh
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Kevin Beja
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Amanda Wong
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Sofie Verbeke
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Nicolaas Lumen
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Jo Van Dorpe
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Bram De Laere
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Matti Annala
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Prostate Cancer Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere, Finland
| | - Gillian Vandekerkhove
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Alexander W Wyatt
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
- Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wyatt AW. Rare Genetic Drivers of Lethal Prostate Cancer. JAMA Oncol 2023; 9:1499-1501. [PMID: 37733349 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.3352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander W Wyatt
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, British Columbia Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rendon RA, Selvarajah S, Wyatt AW, Kolinsky M, Schrader KA, Fleshner NE, Kinnaird A, Merrimen J, Niazi T, Saad F, Shayegan B, Wood L, Chi KN. 2023 Canadian Urological Association guideline: Genetic testing in prostate cancer. Can Urol Assoc J 2023; 17:314-325. [PMID: 37851913 PMCID: PMC10581723 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.8588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shamini Selvarajah
- Department of Clinical Laboratory Genetics, UHN Laboratory Medicine Program, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alexander W. Wyatt
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Michael Kolinsky
- Division of Medical Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | | | - Neil E. Fleshner
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Adam Kinnaird
- Divison of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | | | - Tamim Niazi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Fred Saad
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Bobby Shayegan
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Lori Wood
- Division of Medical Oncology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Schostak M, Bradbury A, Briganti A, Gonzalez D, Gomella L, Mateo J, Penault-Llorca F, Stenzinger A, Wyatt AW, Bjartell A. Practical Guidance on Establishing a Molecular Testing Pathway for Alterations in Homologous Recombination Repair Genes in Clinical Practice for Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol Oncol 2023:S2588-9311(23)00166-9. [PMID: 37714762 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Revised: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/17/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Prostate cancer is a molecularly heterogeneous disease that is amenable to diagnostic testing to identify patients potentially eligible for personalised treatments inform familial risk and provide relevant information about potential prognosis. Several guidelines support the integration of genomic testing in a shared decision-making framework so that both health care professionals (HCPs) and patients are involved in determining the best treatment approach. OBJECTIVE To review current guidelines on molecular diagnostic testing for homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene alterations in patients with metastatic prostate cancer, with the aim of providing practical considerations for effective guideline implementation and establishment of an appropriate pathway for molecular diagnostic testing. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We undertook a nonsystematic narrative review of the literature using PubMed to identify current guidelines and recommendations on molecular diagnostic testing for BRCA and/or homologous recombination repair gene alterations (HRRm) in patients with prostate cancer. In addition, selected articles that included BRCA/HRRm testing in clinical trials in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and real-world evidence were also evaluated. Websites for relevant societies were reviewed for molecular diagnostic guidelines not published on PubMed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Our review of guidelines published by several international societies that include molecular testing in prostate cancer identified variations in molecular testing approaches. The review of testing approaches used in clinical trials and real-world settings also highlighted several aspects that require improvement. Therefore, we compiled practical guidance for establishing an appropriate BRCA/HRR mutation testing pathway. CONCLUSIONS While there are several challenges to molecular testing and interpretation of test results that require enhancement, a multidisciplinary team approach will empower HCPs and their institutions to improve on or initiate their own molecular testing pathways. This in turn will lead to improvements in management strategies for patients with metastatic prostate cancer, for whom better treatment outcomes is a significant unmet need. PATIENT SUMMARY Establishing a molecular testing pathway in clinical practice for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer will lead to fairer and more equal access to personalised treatments. This should lead to better outcomes, particularly for patients whose disease has spread to other areas of the body.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Schostak
- Department of Urology, Urooncology, Robot-assisted and Focal Treatment, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
| | - Angela Bradbury
- Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - David Gonzalez
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University, Belfast, UK
| | - Leonard Gomella
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Joaquin Mateo
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Alexander W Wyatt
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Anders Bjartell
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden; Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Helzer KT, Sharifi MN, Sperger JM, Shi Y, Annala M, Bootsma ML, Reese SR, Taylor A, Kaufmann KR, Krause HK, Schehr JL, Sethakorn N, Kosoff D, Kyriakopoulos C, Burkard ME, Rydzewski NR, Yu M, Harari PM, Bassetti M, Blitzer G, Floberg J, Sjöström M, Quigley DA, Dehm SM, Armstrong AJ, Beltran H, McKay RR, Feng FY, O'Regan R, Wisinski KB, Emamekhoo H, Wyatt AW, Lang JM, Zhao SG. Fragmentomic analysis of circulating tumor DNA-targeted cancer panels. Ann Oncol 2023; 34:813-825. [PMID: 37330052 PMCID: PMC10527168 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Revised: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The isolation of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from the bloodstream can be used to detect and analyze somatic alterations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), and multiple cfDNA-targeted sequencing panels are now commercially available for Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved biomarker indications to guide treatment. More recently, cfDNA fragmentation patterns have emerged as a tool to infer epigenomic and transcriptomic information. However, most of these analyses used whole-genome sequencing, which is insufficient to identify FDA-approved biomarker indications in a cost-effective manner. PATIENTS AND METHODS We used machine learning models of fragmentation patterns at the first coding exon in standard targeted cancer gene cfDNA sequencing panels to distinguish between cancer and non-cancer patients, as well as the specific tumor type and subtype. We assessed this approach in two independent cohorts: a published cohort from GRAIL (breast, lung, and prostate cancers, non-cancer, n = 198) and an institutional cohort from the University of Wisconsin (UW; breast, lung, prostate, bladder cancers, n = 320). Each cohort was split 70%/30% into training and validation sets. RESULTS In the UW cohort, training cross-validated accuracy was 82.1%, and accuracy in the independent validation cohort was 86.6% despite a median ctDNA fraction of only 0.06. In the GRAIL cohort, to assess how this approach performs in very low ctDNA fractions, training and independent validation were split based on ctDNA fraction. Training cross-validated accuracy was 80.6%, and accuracy in the independent validation cohort was 76.3%. In the validation cohort where the ctDNA fractions were all <0.05 and as low as 0.0003, the cancer versus non-cancer area under the curve was 0.99. CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate that sequencing from targeted cfDNA panels can be utilized to analyze fragmentation patterns to classify cancer types, dramatically expanding the potential capabilities of existing clinically used panels at minimal additional cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K T Helzer
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison
| | - M N Sharifi
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA
| | - J M Sperger
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA
| | - Y Shi
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison
| | - M Annala
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Prostate Cancer Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere, Finland
| | - M L Bootsma
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison
| | - S R Reese
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA
| | - A Taylor
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA
| | - K R Kaufmann
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA
| | - H K Krause
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA
| | - J L Schehr
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison
| | - N Sethakorn
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA
| | - D Kosoff
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA
| | - C Kyriakopoulos
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA
| | - M E Burkard
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA
| | - N R Rydzewski
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison
| | - M Yu
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin, Madison
| | - P M Harari
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison
| | - M Bassetti
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison
| | - G Blitzer
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison
| | - J Floberg
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison
| | - M Sjöström
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco; Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco
| | - D A Quigley
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco; Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics; Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco
| | - S M Dehm
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| | - A J Armstrong
- Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham
| | - H Beltran
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| | - R R McKay
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla
| | - F Y Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco; Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco
| | - R O'Regan
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA; Department of Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, USA
| | - K B Wisinski
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA
| | - H Emamekhoo
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA
| | - A W Wyatt
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada
| | - J M Lang
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA
| | - S G Zhao
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison; William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans' Hospital, Madison, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lundberg A, Zhang M, Aggarwal R, Li H, Zhang L, Foye A, Sjöström M, Chou J, Chang K, Moreno-Rodriguez T, Shrestha R, Baskin A, Zhu X, Weinstein AS, Younger N, Alumkal JJ, Beer TM, Chi KN, Evans CP, Gleave M, Lara PN, Reiter RE, Rettig MB, Witte ON, Wyatt AW, Feng FY, Small EJ, Quigley DA. The Genomic and Epigenomic Landscape of Double-Negative Metastatic Prostate Cancer. Cancer Res 2023; 83:2763-2774. [PMID: 37289025 PMCID: PMC10425725 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-23-0593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Revised: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Systemic targeted therapy in prostate cancer is primarily focused on ablating androgen signaling. Androgen deprivation therapy and second-generation androgen receptor (AR)-targeted therapy selectively favor the development of treatment-resistant subtypes of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), defined by AR and neuroendocrine (NE) markers. Molecular drivers of double-negative (AR-/NE-) mCRPC are poorly defined. In this study, we comprehensively characterized treatment-emergent mCRPC by integrating matched RNA sequencing, whole-genome sequencing, and whole-genome bisulfite sequencing from 210 tumors. AR-/NE- tumors were clinically and molecularly distinct from other mCRPC subtypes, with the shortest survival, amplification of the chromatin remodeler CHD7, and PTEN loss. Methylation changes in CHD7 candidate enhancers were linked to elevated CHD7 expression in AR-/NE+ tumors. Genome-wide methylation analysis nominated Krüppel-like factor 5 (KLF5) as a driver of the AR-/NE- phenotype, and KLF5 activity was linked to RB1 loss. These observations reveal the aggressiveness of AR-/NE- mCRPC and could facilitate the identification of therapeutic targets in this highly aggressive disease. SIGNIFICANCE Comprehensive characterization of the five subtypes of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer identified transcription factors that drive each subtype and showed that the double-negative subtype has the worst prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arian Lundberg
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Meng Zhang
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Rahul Aggarwal
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Haolong Li
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Li Zhang
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Adam Foye
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Martin Sjöström
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Jonathan Chou
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Kevin Chang
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Thaidy Moreno-Rodriguez
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Raunak Shrestha
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Avi Baskin
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Xiaolin Zhu
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Alana S. Weinstein
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Noah Younger
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Joshi J. Alumkal
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Tomasz M. Beer
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Kim N. Chi
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Christopher P. Evans
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California
- Department of Urologic Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California
| | - Martin Gleave
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Primo N. Lara
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California
| | - Rob E. Reiter
- Departments of Medicine, Hematology/Oncology and Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Matthew B. Rettig
- Departments of Medicine, Hematology/Oncology and Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California
| | - Owen N. Witte
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Alexander W. Wyatt
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Felix Y. Feng
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Eric J. Small
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - David A. Quigley
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Herberts C, Wyatt AW, Nguyen PL, Cheng HH. Genetic and Genomic Testing for Prostate Cancer: Beyond DNA Repair. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2023; 43:e390384. [PMID: 37207301 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_390384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
Significant progress has been made in genetic and genomic testing for prostate cancer across the disease spectrum. Molecular profiling is increasingly relevant for routine clinical management, fueled in part by advancements in testing technology and integration of biomarkers into clinical trials. In metastatic prostate cancer, defects in DNA damage response genes are now established predictors of benefit to US Food and Drug Administration-approved poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors, and trials are actively investigating these and other targeted treatment strategies in earlier disease states. Excitingly, opportunities for molecularly informed management beyond DNA damage response genes are also maturing. Germline genetic variants (eg, BRCA2 or MSH2/6) and polygenic germline risk scores are being investigated to inform cancer screening and active surveillance in at-risk carriers. RNA expression tests have recently gained traction in localized prostate cancer, enabling patient risk stratification and tailored treatment intensification via radiotherapy and/or androgen deprivation therapy for localized or salvage treatment. Finally, emerging minimally invasive circulating tumor DNA technology promises to enhance biomarker testing in advanced disease pending additional methodological and clinical validation. Collectively, genetic and genomic tests are rapidly becoming indispensable tools for informing the optimal clinical management of prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cameron Herberts
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Alexander W Wyatt
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Paul L Nguyen
- Harvard Medical School, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | - Heather H Cheng
- University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tolmeijer SH, Boerrigter E, Sumiyoshi T, Kwan EM, Ng S, Annala M, Donnellan G, Herberts C, Benoist GE, Hamberg P, Somford DM, van Oort IM, Schalken JA, Mehra N, van Erp NP, Wyatt AW. Early on-treatment changes in circulating tumor DNA fraction and response to enzalutamide or abiraterone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2023:724963. [PMID: 36996325 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-2998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Revised: 12/13/2022] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI) are standard of care for treatment-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), but rapid resistance is common. Early identification of resistance will improve management strategies. We investigated whether changes in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) fraction during ARPI treatment are linked with mCRPC clinical outcomes. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Plasma cell-free DNA was collected from 81 patients with mCRPC at baseline and after 4-weeks of first-line ARPI treatment during two prospective multi-centre observational studies (NCT02426333;NCT02471469). CtDNA fraction was calculated from somatic mutations in targeted sequencing and genome copy number profiles. Samples were classified into detected vs. undetected ctDNA. Outcome measurements were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Non-durable treatment response was defined as PFS ≤ 6 months. RESULTS CtDNA was detected in 48/81 (59%) baseline and 29/81 (36%) 4-week samples. CtDNA fraction for samples with detected ctDNA was lower at 4-weeks vs. baseline (median 5.0% vs. 14.5%, P=0.017). PFS and OS was shortest for patients with persistent ctDNA at 4 weeks (univariate hazard ratio 4.79 (95%CI, 2.62-8.77) and 5.49 (95%CI, 2.76-10.91), respectively), independent of clinical prognostic factors. For patients exhibiting change from detected to undetected ctDNA by 4-weeks, there was no significant PFS difference versus patients with baseline undetected ctDNA. CtDNA change had a positive predictive value of 88% and negative predictive value of 92% for identifying non-durable responses. CONCLUSIONS Early changes in ctDNA% are strongly linked to duration of first-line ARPI treatment benefit and survival in mCRPC and may inform early therapy switches or treatment intensification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Emmy Boerrigter
- Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Sarah Ng
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Matti Annala
- Tampere University and Tays Cancer Centre, Tampere, Finland
| | | | - Cameron Herberts
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Inge M van Oort
- Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Jack A Schalken
- Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Niven Mehra
- Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Nielka P van Erp
- Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ritch EJ, Herberts C, Warner EW, Ng SWS, Kwan EM, Bacon JVW, Bernales CQ, Schönlau E, Fonseca NM, Giri VN, Maurice-Dror C, Vandekerkhove G, Jones SJM, Chi KN, Wyatt AW. A generalizable machine learning framework for classifying DNA repair defects using ctDNA exomes. NPJ Precis Oncol 2023; 7:27. [PMID: 36914848 PMCID: PMC10011564 DOI: 10.1038/s41698-023-00366-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2022] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Specific classes of DNA damage repair (DDR) defect can drive sensitivity to emerging therapies for metastatic prostate cancer. However, biomarker approaches based on DDR gene sequencing do not accurately predict DDR deficiency or treatment benefit. Somatic alteration signatures may identify DDR deficiency but historically require whole-genome sequencing of tumour tissue. We assembled whole-exome sequencing data for 155 high ctDNA fraction plasma cell-free DNA and matched leukocyte DNA samples from patients with metastatic prostate or bladder cancer. Labels for DDR gene alterations were established using deep targeted sequencing. Per sample mutation and copy number features were used to train XGBoost ensemble models. Naive somatic features and trinucleotide signatures were associated with specific DDR gene alterations but insufficient to resolve each class. Conversely, XGBoost-derived models showed strong performance including an area under the curve of 0.99, 0.99 and 1.00 for identifying BRCA2, CDK12, and mismatch repair deficiency in metastatic prostate cancer. Our machine learning approach re-classified several samples exhibiting genomic features inconsistent with original labels, identified a metastatic bladder cancer sample with a homozygous BRCA2 copy loss, and outperformed an existing exome-based classifier for BRCA2 deficiency. We present DARC Sign (DnA Repair Classification SIGNatures); a public machine learning tool leveraging clinically-practical liquid biopsy specimens for simultaneously identifying multiple types of metastatic prostate cancer DDR deficiencies. We posit that it will be useful for understanding differential responses to DDR-directed therapies in ongoing clinical trials and may ultimately enable prospective identification of prostate cancers with phenotypic evidence of DDR deficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elie J Ritch
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Cameron Herberts
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Evan W Warner
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Sarah W S Ng
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Edmond M Kwan
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Jack V W Bacon
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Cecily Q Bernales
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Elena Schönlau
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Nicolette M Fonseca
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Veda N Giri
- Yale School of Medicine and Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Gillian Vandekerkhove
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Steven J M Jones
- Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Kim N Chi
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Alexander W Wyatt
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. .,Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tortora D, Roberts ME, Kumar G, Kotapalli SS, Ritch E, Scurll JM, McConeghy B, Sinha S, Wyatt AW, Black PC, Daugaard M. A genome-wide CRISPR screen maps endogenous regulators of PPARG gene expression in bladder cancer. iScience 2023; 26:106525. [DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Revised: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/26/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023] Open
|
15
|
Bacon JVW, Müller DC, Ritch E, Annala M, Dugas SG, Herberts C, Vandekerkhove G, Seifert H, Zellweger T, Black PC, Bubendorf L, Wyatt AW, Rentsch CA. Somatic Features of Response and Relapse in Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Treated with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin Immunotherapy. Eur Urol Oncol 2022; 5:677-686. [PMID: 34895867 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Revised: 10/13/2021] [Accepted: 11/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND High-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is treated with bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG), but relapse is common. Improvement of patient outcomes requires better understanding of links between BCG resistance and genomic driver alterations. OBJECTIVE To validate the prognostic impact of common genomic alterations in NMIBC pretreatment and define somatic changes present in post-BCG relapses. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We retrieved tumour tissues and outcomes for 90 patients with BCG-naive NMIBC initiating BCG monotherapy. Post-BCG tissue was available from 34 patients. All tissues underwent targeted sequencing of tumour and matched normal. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Associations between clinical outcomes and genomics were determined using Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Of the patients, 58% were relapse free at data cut-off, 24% had NMIBC recurrence, and 18% experienced muscle-invasive progression. The risk of relapse was associated with ARID1A mutation (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.00; p = 0.04) and CCNE1 amplification (HR = 2.61; p = 0.02). Pre- and post-BCG tumours shared truncal driver alterations, with mutations in TERT and chromatin remodelling genes particularly conserved. However, shifts in somatic profiles were common and clinically relevant alterations in FGFR3, PIK3CA, TSC1, and TP53 were temporally variable, despite apparent clonal prevalence at one time point. Limitations include the difficulty of resolving the relative impact of BCG therapy versus surgery on genomics at relapse and biopsy bias. CONCLUSIONS Somatic hypermutation and alterations in CCNE1 and ARID1A should be incorporated into future models predicting NMIBC BCG outcomes. Changes in tumour genomics over time highlight the importance of recent biopsy when considering targeted therapies, and suggest that relapse after BCG is due to persisting and evolving precursor populations. PATIENT SUMMARY Changes in key cancer genes can predict bladder cancer relapse after treatment with bacillus Calmette-Guérin. Relapses after treatment can be driven by large-scale genetic changes within the cancer. These genetic changes help us understand how superficial bladder cancer can progress to be treatment resistant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack V W Bacon
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - David C Müller
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Department of Urology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Elie Ritch
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Matti Annala
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Prostate Cancer Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences and BioMediTech Institute, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| | - Sarah G Dugas
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Department of Urology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Cameron Herberts
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Gillian Vandekerkhove
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Helge Seifert
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Peter C Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Lukas Bubendorf
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Alexander W Wyatt
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
| | - Cyrill A Rentsch
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kwan EM, Wyatt AW, Chi KN. Towards clinical implementation of circulating tumor DNA in metastatic prostate cancer: Opportunities for integration and pitfalls to interpretation. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1054497. [PMID: 36439451 PMCID: PMC9685669 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1054497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) represents short fragments of tumor-derived DNA released into the bloodstream primarily from cancer cells undergoing apoptosis. In metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), characterizing genomic alterations in ctDNA identifies mutations, copy number alterations, and structural rearrangements with predictive and prognostic biomarker utility. These associations with clinical outcomes have resulted in ctDNA increasingly incorporated into routine clinical care. In this review, we summarize current and emerging applications for ctDNA analysis in metastatic prostate cancer, including outcome prediction, treatment selection, and characterization of treatment resistance. We also discuss potential pitfalls with interpreting ctDNA findings, namely false negatives arising from low tumor content and optimal assay design, including correction for clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential and germline variants. Understanding the influence of these limitations on interpretation of ctDNA results is necessary to overcome barriers to clinical implementation. Nevertheless, as assay availability and technology continue to improve, recognizing both opportunities and shortcomings of ctDNA analysis will retain relevance with informing the implementation of precision-oncology initiatives for metastatic prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edmond M. Kwan
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- BC Cancer, Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Alexander W. Wyatt
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Kim N. Chi
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- BC Cancer, Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Sjöström M, Zhao SG, Levy S, Zhang M, Ning Y, Shrestha R, Lundberg A, Herberts C, Foye A, Aggarwal R, Hua JT, Li H, Bergamaschi A, Maurice-Dror C, Maheshwari A, Chen S, Ng SWS, Ye W, Petricca J, Fraser M, Chesner L, Perry MD, Moreno-Rodriguez T, Chen WS, Alumkal JJ, Chou J, Morgans AK, Beer TM, Thomas GV, Gleave M, Lloyd P, Phillips T, McCarthy E, Haffner MC, Zoubeidi A, Annala M, Reiter RE, Rettig MB, Witte ON, Fong L, Bose R, Huang FW, Luo J, Bjartell A, Lang JM, Mahajan NP, Lara PN, Evans CP, Tran PT, Posadas EM, He C, Cui XL, Huang J, Zwart W, Gilbert LA, Maher CA, Boutros PC, Chi KN, Ashworth A, Small EJ, He HH, Wyatt AW, Quigley DA, Feng FY. The 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine Landscape of Prostate Cancer. Cancer Res 2022; 82:3888-3902. [PMID: 36251389 PMCID: PMC9627125 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-22-1123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Revised: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Analysis of DNA methylation is a valuable tool to understand disease progression and is increasingly being used to create diagnostic and prognostic clinical biomarkers. While conversion of cytosine to 5-methylcytosine (5mC) commonly results in transcriptional repression, further conversion to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) is associated with transcriptional activation. Here we perform the first study integrating whole-genome 5hmC with DNA, 5mC, and transcriptome sequencing in clinical samples of benign, localized, and advanced prostate cancer. 5hmC is shown to mark activation of cancer drivers and downstream targets. Furthermore, 5hmC sequencing revealed profoundly altered cell states throughout the disease course, characterized by increased proliferation, oncogenic signaling, dedifferentiation, and lineage plasticity to neuroendocrine and gastrointestinal lineages. Finally, 5hmC sequencing of cell-free DNA from patients with metastatic disease proved useful as a prognostic biomarker able to identify an aggressive subtype of prostate cancer using the genes TOP2A and EZH2, previously only detectable by transcriptomic analysis of solid tumor biopsies. Overall, these findings reveal that 5hmC marks epigenomic activation in prostate cancer and identify hallmarks of prostate cancer progression with potential as biomarkers of aggressive disease. SIGNIFICANCE In prostate cancer, 5-hydroxymethylcytosine delineates oncogene activation and stage-specific cell states and can be analyzed in liquid biopsies to detect cancer phenotypes. See related article by Wu and Attard, p. 3880.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Sjöström
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
- Division of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Shuang G Zhao
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
- William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans' Hospital, Madison, WI
| | | | - Meng Zhang
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Raunak Shrestha
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Arian Lundberg
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Cameron Herberts
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Adam Foye
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Rahul Aggarwal
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Junjie T Hua
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Haolong Li
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Corinne Maurice-Dror
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Ashutosh Maheshwari
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Sujun Chen
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sarah W S Ng
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Wenbin Ye
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Automation, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China
| | - Jessica Petricca
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael Fraser
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lisa Chesner
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Marc D Perry
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Thaidy Moreno-Rodriguez
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - William S Chen
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Joshi J Alumkal
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Jonathan Chou
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Alicia K Morgans
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Tomasz M Beer
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR
| | - George V Thomas
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR
- Department of Pathology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Martin Gleave
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Michael C Haffner
- Divisions of Human Biology and Clinical Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Amina Zoubeidi
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Matti Annala
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Centre, Tampere, Finland
| | - Robert E Reiter
- Departments of Medicine, Hematology/Oncology and Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Matthew B Rettig
- Departments of Medicine, Hematology/Oncology and Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Owen N Witte
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Lawrence Fong
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Rohit Bose
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
- Department of Anatomy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Franklin W Huang
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Jianhua Luo
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Anders Bjartell
- Department of Translational Medicine, Medical Faculty, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Joshua M Lang
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
| | | | - Primo N Lara
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA
| | - Christopher P Evans
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA
- Department of Urologic Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA
| | - Phuoc T Tran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland, College Park, Baltimore, MD
| | - Edwin M Posadas
- Urologic Oncology Program & Uro-Oncology Research Laboratories, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Chuan He
- Department of Chemistry, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Institute for Biophysical Dynamics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Xiao-Long Cui
- Department of Chemistry, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Institute for Biophysical Dynamics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Jiaoti Huang
- Department of Pathology, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Wilbert Zwart
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Luke A Gilbert
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
- Arc Institute, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Christopher A Maher
- Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University, St. Louis, MO
- McDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University, St. Louis, MO
- Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, MO
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO
| | - Paul C Boutros
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Human Genetics, Institute for Precision Health, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Departments of Human Genetics and Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Kim N Chi
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Alan Ashworth
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Eric J Small
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Housheng H He
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alexander W Wyatt
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - David A Quigley
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Felix Y Feng
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bacon JVW, Giannatempo P, Cataldo G, Fazli L, Saxena N, Ozgun G, Soleimani M, Chi K, Nichols C, Necchi A, Wyatt AW, Kollmannsberger CK, Nappi L. TP53 Alterations Are Associated With Poor Survival in Patients With Primary Mediastinal Nonseminoma Germ Cell Tumors. Oncologist 2022; 27:e912-e915. [PMID: 36166584 PMCID: PMC9632310 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary mediastinal nonseminoma germ cell tumors (PMNSGCT) are a subgroup of nonseminoma germ cell tumors (GCT) with poor prognosis. In this study, PMNSGCT-specific genomic landscape was analyzed and correlated with clinical outcomes. METHODS DNA was extracted and sequenced from 28 archival tumor tissue of patients with mediastinal GCT (3 seminoma and 25 nonseminoma). Overall survival (OS) and association with gene alterations were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier and univariate Cox regression methods. RESULTS Three patients (11%) had a karyotype XXY, 17/28 (61%) tumor samples presented chromosome 12p amplification. Somatic mutations were detected in 19/28 (68%) samples. The most frequently mutated genes were: TP53 (13/28; 46%), KIT (5/28; 18%), and KRAS (5/28; 18%). Deleterious TP53 alterations were associated with significantly reduced overall survival (HR: 7.16; P = .012). CONCLUSIONS TP53 alterations are common in PMNSGCT and are associated with reduced overall survival, potentially underlying the poor sensitivity to chemotherapy observed in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack V W Bacon
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Patrizia Giannatempo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Ladan Fazli
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Neetu Saxena
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Guliz Ozgun
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Maryam Soleimani
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Kim Chi
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Andrea Necchi
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University; IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Alexander W Wyatt
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada,Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Christian K Kollmannsberger
- Christian Kollmannsberger, Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, 600 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, Canada V5Z 4E6. Tel: +1 604 877 6000; Fax: +1 604 708 2144;
| | - Lucia Nappi
- Corresponding author: Lucia Nappi, MD, PhD, Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, 600 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, Canada V5Z 4E6. Tel: +1 604 877 6000; Fax: +1 604 877 0585;
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Sutera P, Deek MP, Van der Eecken K, Wyatt AW, Kishan AU, Molitoris JK, Ferris MJ, Minhaj Siddiqui M, Rana Z, Mishra MV, Kwok Y, Davicioni E, Spratt DE, Ost P, Feng FY, Tran PT. Genomic biomarkers to guide precision radiotherapy in prostate cancer. Prostate 2022; 82 Suppl 1:S73-S85. [PMID: 35657158 PMCID: PMC9202472 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2022] [Revised: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Our ability to prognosticate the clinical course of patients with cancer has historically been limited to clinical, histopathological, and radiographic features. It has long been clear however, that these data alone do not adequately capture the heterogeneity and breadth of disease trajectories experienced by patients. The advent of efficient genomic sequencing has led to a revolution in cancer care as we try to understand and personalize treatment specific to patient clinico-genomic phenotypes. Within prostate cancer, emerging evidence suggests that tumor genomics (e.g., DNA, RNA, and epigenetics) can be utilized to inform clinical decision making. In addition to providing discriminatory information about prognosis, it is likely tumor genomics also hold a key in predicting response to oncologic therapies which could be used to further tailor treatment recommendations. Herein we review select literature surrounding the use of tumor genomics within the management of prostate cancer, specifically leaning toward analytically validated and clinically tested genomic biomarkers utilized in radiotherapy and/or adjunctive therapies given with radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip Sutera
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Matthew P. Deek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Kim Van der Eecken
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium
| | - Alexander W. Wyatt
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Amar U. Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jason K. Molitoris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Matthew J. Ferris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - M. Minhaj Siddiqui
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Zaker Rana
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mark V. Mishra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Young Kwok
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Daniel E. Spratt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, Antwerp, Belgium and Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Felix Y. Feng
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Medicine and Urology, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Phuoc T. Tran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kwan EM, Wyatt AW. Androgen receptor genomic alterations and treatment resistance in metastatic prostate cancer. Prostate 2022; 82 Suppl 1:S25-S36. [PMID: 35657159 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Revised: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Genomic alterations to the androgen receptor (AR) are common in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). AR copy number amplifications, ligand-binding domain missense mutations, and intronic structural rearrangements can all drive resistance to approved AR pathway inhibitors and their detection via tissue or liquid biopsy is linked to clinical outcomes. With an increasingly crowded treatment landscape, there is hope that AR genomic alterations can act as prognostic and/or predictive biomarkers to guide patient management. METHODS In this review, we evaluate the current evidence for AR genomic alterations as clinical biomarkers in mCRPC, focusing on correlative studies that have used plasma circulating tumor DNA to characterize AR genotype. RESULTS We highlight data that demonstrates the complexity of AR genotype within individual patients, and suggest that future studies should account for cancer clonal heterogeneity and variable tumor content in liquid biopsy samples. Given the potential for cooccurrence of multiple AR genomic alterations in the same or competing subclones of a patient, it is distinctly challenging to attribute blanket clinical significance to any individual alteration. This challenge is further complicated by the varied treatment exposures in contemporary patients, and the fact that AR genotype continues to evolve in the mCRPC setting across sequential lines of systemic therapy. CONCLUSIONS As treatment access and liquid biopsy technology continues to improve, we posit that real-time measures of AR biology are likely to play a key role in emerging precision oncology strategies for metastatic prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edmond M Kwan
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Alexander W Wyatt
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Herberts C, Annala M, Sipola J, Ng SWS, Chen XE, Nurminen A, Korhonen OV, Munzur AD, Beja K, Schönlau E, Bernales CQ, Ritch E, Bacon JVW, Lack NA, Nykter M, Aggarwal R, Small EJ, Gleave ME, Quigley DA, Feng FY, Chi KN, Wyatt AW. Deep whole-genome ctDNA chronology of treatment-resistant prostate cancer. Nature 2022; 608:199-208. [PMID: 35859180 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-04975-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) in blood plasma is an emerging tool for clinical cancer genotyping and longitudinal disease monitoring1. However, owing to past emphasis on targeted and low-resolution profiling approaches, our understanding of the distinct populations that comprise bulk ctDNA is incomplete2-12. Here we perform deep whole-genome sequencing of serial plasma and synchronous metastases in patients with aggressive prostate cancer. We comprehensively assess all classes of genomic alterations and show that ctDNA contains multiple dominant populations, the evolutionary histories of which frequently indicate whole-genome doubling and shifts in mutational processes. Although tissue and ctDNA showed concordant clonally expanded cancer driver alterations, most individual metastases contributed only a minor share of total ctDNA. By comparing serial ctDNA before and after clinical progression on potent inhibitors of the androgen receptor (AR) pathway, we reveal population restructuring converging solely on AR augmentation as the dominant genomic driver of acquired treatment resistance. Finally, we leverage nucleosome footprints in ctDNA to infer mRNA expression in synchronously biopsied metastases, including treatment-induced changes in AR transcription factor signalling activity. Our results provide insights into cancer biology and show that liquid biopsy can be used as a tool for comprehensive multi-omic discovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cameron Herberts
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Matti Annala
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Prostate Cancer Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere, Finland
| | - Joonatan Sipola
- Prostate Cancer Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere, Finland
| | - Sarah W S Ng
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Xinyi E Chen
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Anssi Nurminen
- Prostate Cancer Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere, Finland
| | - Olga V Korhonen
- Prostate Cancer Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere, Finland
| | - Aslı D Munzur
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Kevin Beja
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Elena Schönlau
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Cecily Q Bernales
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Elie Ritch
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jack V W Bacon
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Nathan A Lack
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,School of Medicine, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey.,Koç University Research Centre for Translational Medicine, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Matti Nykter
- Prostate Cancer Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere, Finland
| | - Rahul Aggarwal
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Eric J Small
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Martin E Gleave
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - David A Quigley
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Felix Y Feng
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Kim N Chi
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Alexander W Wyatt
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. .,Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Herberts C, Annala M, Sipola J, Ng SW, Chen XE, Nurminen A, Korhonen O, Munzur AD, Beja K, Schönlau E, Bernales CQ, Ritch E, Bacon JV, Lack NA, Nykter M, Aggarwal R, Small EJ, Gleave ME, Quigley DA, Feng FY, Chi KN, Wyatt AW. Abstract 3625: Clonal architecture and evolution of treatment-resistant prostate cancer via deep whole-genome ctDNA sequencing. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-3625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in blood plasma is an emerging tool for clinical cancer genotyping and longitudinal disease monitoring. However, integration of ctDNA tests into clinical management is critically impeded by the poor understanding of the distinct somatic populations comprising bulk ctDNA—including their relationship to synchronous metastatic tissue, and their temporal dynamics during standard-of-care treatment. Prior approaches relying on targeted and/or low-resolution techniques (e.g. targeted exon sequencing, low-pass (shallow) whole-genome sequencing; WGS) do not permit comprehensive dissection of clonal architecture and unbiased analysis of putative resistance mechanisms.
Methods: We performed deep WGS on serial plasma ctDNA (median depth: 185×) and synchronous metastatic tissue biopsies with high tumor purity from 35 patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. We developed a subclonal reconstruction algorithm optimized for our data enabling resolution of per-patient evolutionary histories and ctDNA clonal composition. ctDNA nucleosome footprinting was used to infer mRNA abundance in synchronously biopsied metastases and androgen receptor (AR) transcription factor activity at 3224 AR binding sites (ARBS).
Results: We comprehensively assess all classes of genomic alterations and demonstrate that ctDNA harbors greater populational heterogeneity than metastatic tissue (p<0.001). The evolutionary histories of ctDNA populations indicate frequent whole-genome doubling and attenuation of C>T aging-associated mutation signature during subclonal differentiation. Although driver alterations were largely concordant between tissue and ctDNA, each individual metastasis contributed only a minor share of total ctDNA (average ctDNA contribution: 17%). By comparing serial ctDNA before and after clinical progression on potent AR pathway inhibitors, we reveal population restructuring converging solely on AR copy augmentation as the dominant genomic driver of acquired treatment-resistance. Nucleosome depletion at transcription start-sites is highly correlated with same-patient metastatic tissue mRNA abundance, indicating that ctDNA fragmentomics can recapitulate transcriptomic patterns in metastatic lesions. Most ctDNA samples exhibited strong ARBS nucleosome depletion which correlated with AR gene copy number (R=0.36, p=0.003). Finally, serial ctDNA nucleosome profiling at ARBS revealed adaptive transcriptomic resistance to AR pathway inhibitors, including lineage switch to a neuroendocrine-like (AR-low) state.
Conclusions: We show that the populations comprising ctDNA are typically complex and more heterogeneous than those found in bulk WGS of a synchronous metastasis. Our work advocates for liquid biopsy as a comprehensive multi-omic discovery tool for cancers with high ctDNA fractions.
Citation Format: Cameron Herberts, Matti Annala, Joonatan Sipola, Sarah W. Ng, Xinyi E. Chen, Anssi Nurminen, Olga Korhonen, Aslı D. Munzur, Kevin Beja, Elena Schönlau, Cecily Q. Bernales, Elie Ritch, Jack V. Bacon, Nathan A. Lack, Matti Nykter, Rahul Aggarwal, Eric J. Small, Martin E. Gleave, David A. Quigley, Felix Y. Feng, Kim N. Chi, Alexander W. Wyatt. Clonal architecture and evolution of treatment-resistant prostate cancer via deep whole-genome ctDNA sequencing [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 3625.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cameron Herberts
- 1University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Matti Annala
- 2Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere, Finland
| | - Joonatan Sipola
- 2Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere, Finland
| | - Sarah W. Ng
- 1University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Xinyi E. Chen
- 1University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Anssi Nurminen
- 2Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere, Finland
| | - Olga Korhonen
- 2Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere, Finland
| | - Aslı D. Munzur
- 1University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Kevin Beja
- 1University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Elena Schönlau
- 1University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Elie Ritch
- 1University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jack V. Bacon
- 1University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Nathan A. Lack
- 1University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Matti Nykter
- 2Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere, Finland
| | - Rahul Aggarwal
- 3University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Eric J. Small
- 3University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Martin E. Gleave
- 1University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Felix Y. Feng
- 3University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Kim N. Chi
- 4BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Warner E, Van der Eecken K, Murtha AJ, Kwan EM, Ng SW, Chen XE, Bernales CQ, Donnellan G, Schonlau E, Verbeke S, Lumen N, Van Dorpe J, Vandekerkhove G, Ritch E, Annala M, De Laere B, Ost P, Wyatt AW. Abstract 41: Multi-focal genomic dissection of synchronous primary and metastatic tissue from de novo metastatic prostate cancer. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-41] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: 10% of newly diagnosed prostate cancer presents with metastases. Known as de novo metastatic castrate-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC), it is disproportionally responsible for >50% of prostate cancer deaths. Cancer genotyping can identify vulnerabilities exploitable by targeted therapies, and promises to help prognosticate. However, tissue from de novo mCSPC is scarce; neither prostatectomy nor metastatic biopsy is standard, and it is unknown if diagnostic biopsies are representative of synchronous metastases. The potential for plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to inform on tumor genotype is also unknown.
Methods: We performed comprehensive pathological and genomic assessment of all spatially or phenotypically-distinct tumor foci (n=523) in 43 patients with de novo mCSPC who underwent prostatectomy, pelvic lymph node dissection, and plasma collection.
Results: 91% (478/523) of tissue foci had evidence of prostate cancer by targeted DNA sequencing, with a median tumor fraction of 48%. When modeling random selection of a single primary foci (mirroring biopsy tissue availability in clinic), tumor fraction was <20% in 19% of patients. Only 46% of plasma cell-free DNA samples prior to systemic therapy had a ctDNA fraction above 0.3% (limit of detection); median tumor fraction of 5% in samples with confirmed ctDNA. We observed recurrent alterations in major driver genes, including TP53, FOXA1, PTEN, and RB1, and the genomic landscape was very similar to published cohorts of castration-resistant prostate cancer (excluding AR). Primary site genomic heterogeneity was pervasive, including secondary (clonally distinct) prostate cancer populations in 14% of patients. Polyclonal seeding of metastases was detected in 26% of patients. Biallelic inactivation of TP53, PTEN, and/or RB1 was observed in 63% of tumors, and was frequently found in synchronous metastases and ctDNA. The two patients with compound disruption of TP53, PTEN, and RB1 experienced rapid progression to castration-resistance and death within two years of diagnosis, despite initial low-risk clinical features. Across the cohort, biallelic disruption of TP53 together with high-risk clinical features at diagnosis was associated with rapid progression (HR 4.64 (95% CI: 1.70-12.69); P = 0.003).
Conclusions: One fifth of patients with de novo mCSPC have pervasive low tumor fraction in their primary tumor and blood plasma. Many tumors exhibit spatial heterogeneity within the primary site, with evidence of multiple clones seeding metastases. This data raises concerns about accurate tumor genotyping in routine clinical practice where needle biopsy specimens are the only available tissue for profiling. Nevertheless, some de novo mCSPC are marked by aggressive genomics and experience rapid progression to lethal disease, suggesting that tailored multi-focal genomic profiling can further segment the disease.
Citation Format: Evan Warner, Kim Van der Eecken, Andrew J. Murtha, Edmond M. Kwan, Sarah W. Ng, Xinyi E. Chen, Cecily Q. Bernales, Grainne Donnellan, Elena Schonlau, Sofie Verbeke, Nicolaas Lumen, Jo Van Dorpe, Gillian Vandekerkhove, Elie Ritch, Matti Annala, Bram De Laere, Piet Ost, Alexander W. Wyatt. Multi-focal genomic dissection of synchronous primary and metastatic tissue from de novo metastatic prostate cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 41.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan Warner
- 1Vancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | | | - Edmond M. Kwan
- 1Vancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Sarah W. Ng
- 1Vancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Xinyi E. Chen
- 1Vancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | | | - Elena Schonlau
- 1Vancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | - Elie Ritch
- 1Vancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | | | - Piet Ost
- 2Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Orlando F, Romanel A, Trujillo B, Sigouros M, Wetterskog D, Quaini O, Leone G, Xiang JZ, Wingate A, Tagawa S, Jayaram A, Linch M, Jamal-Hanjani M, Swanton C, Rubin MA, Wyatt AW, Beltran H, Attard G, Demichelis F. Allele-informed copy number evaluation of plasma DNA samples from metastatic prostate cancer patients: the PCF_SELECT consortium assay. NAR Cancer 2022; 4:zcac016. [PMID: 35664542 PMCID: PMC9154344 DOI: 10.1093/narcan/zcac016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2021] [Revised: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Sequencing of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in cancer patients' plasma offers a minimally-invasive solution to detect tumor cell genomic alterations to aid real-time clinical decision-making. The reliability of copy number detection decreases at lower cfDNA tumor fractions, limiting utility at earlier stages of the disease. To test a novel strategy for detection of allelic imbalance, we developed a prostate cancer bespoke assay, PCF_SELECT, that includes an innovative sequencing panel covering ∼25 000 high minor allele frequency SNPs and tailored analytical solutions to enable allele-informed evaluation. First, we assessed it on plasma samples from 50 advanced prostate cancer patients. We then confirmed improved detection of genomic alterations in samples with <10% tumor fractions when compared against an independent assay. Finally, we applied PCF_SELECT to serial plasma samples intensively collected from three patients previously characterized as harboring alterations involving DNA repair genes and consequently offered PARP inhibition. We identified more extensive pan-genome allelic imbalance than previously recognized in prostate cancer. We confirmed high sensitivity detection of BRCA2 allelic imbalance with decreasing tumor fractions resultant from treatment and identified complex ATM genomic states that may be incongruent with protein losses. Overall, we present a framework for sensitive detection of allele-specific copy number changes in cfDNA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Orlando
- Department of Cellular, Computational and Integrative Biology, University of Trento, Trento, Italy
| | - Alessandro Romanel
- Department of Cellular, Computational and Integrative Biology, University of Trento, Trento, Italy
| | - Blanca Trujillo
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Medical Oncology, University College London Hospitals, London NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Michael Sigouros
- Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, NY, USA
| | | | - Orsetta Quaini
- Department of Cellular, Computational and Integrative Biology, University of Trento, Trento, Italy
| | - Gianmarco Leone
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Medical Oncology, University College London Hospitals, London NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Jenny Z Xiang
- The Genomics Resources Core Facility, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Weill Cornell Medicine. NY, NY, USA
| | - Anna Wingate
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Scott Tagawa
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine. NY, NY, USA
| | - Anuradha Jayaram
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Medical Oncology, University College London Hospitals, London NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Mark Linch
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Medical Oncology, University College London Hospitals, London NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Mariam Jamal-Hanjani
- Department of Medical Oncology, University College London Hospitals, London NW1 2BU, UK
- Cancer Metastasis Laboratory, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK
- Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK
| | - Charles Swanton
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Medical Oncology, University College London Hospitals, London NW1 2BU, UK
- The Francis Crick Institute, London NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Mark A Rubin
- Department for BioMedical Research and Bern Center of Precision Medicine, University of Bern and Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Alexander W Wyatt
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Himisha Beltran
- Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, NY, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Gerhardt Attard
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Medical Oncology, University College London Hospitals, London NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Francesca Demichelis
- Department of Cellular, Computational and Integrative Biology, University of Trento, Trento, Italy
- Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Fonseca NM, Van der Eecken K, Herberts C, Verbeke S, Ng SWS, Lumen N, Ritch E, Murtha AJ, Bernales CQ, Schönlau E, Moris L, Van Dorpe J, Annala M, Wyatt AW, Ost P. Genomic Features of Lung-Recurrent Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer. JCO Precis Oncol 2022; 6:e2100543. [PMID: 35507889 DOI: 10.1200/po.21.00543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Pulmonary involvement is rare in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) that recurs after treatment for localized disease. Guidelines recommend intensive systemic therapy, similar to patients with liver metastases, but some lung-recurrent mHSPC may have good outcomes. Genomic features of lung metastases may clarify disease aggression, but are poorly understood since lung biopsy is rarely performed. We present a comparative assessment of genomic drivers and heterogeneity in metachronous prostate tumors and lung metastases. METHODS We leveraged a prospective functional imaging study of 208 biochemically recurrent prostate cancers to identify 10 patients with lung-recurrent mHSPC. Histologic diagnosis was attained via thoracic surgery or fine-needle lung biopsy. We retrieved clinical data and performed multiregion sampling of primary tumors and metastases. Targeted and/or whole-exome sequencing was applied to 46 primary and 32 metastatic foci. RESULTS Unusually for mHSPC, all patients remained alive despite a median follow-up of 11.5 years. Several patients experienced long-term freedom from systemic treatment. The genomic landscape of lung-recurrent mHSPC was typical of curable prostate cancer with frequent PTEN, SPOP, and chromosome 8p alterations, and there were no deleterious TP53 and DNA damage repair gene mutations that characterize aggressive prostate cancer. Despite a long median time to recurrence (76.8 months), copy number alterations and clonal mutations were highly conserved between metastatic and primary foci, consistent with intrapatient homogeneity and limited genomic evolution. CONCLUSION In this retrospective hypothesis-generating study, we observed indolent genomic etiology in selected lung-recurrent mHSPC, cautioning against grouping these patients together with liver or bone-predominant mHSPC. Although our data do not generalize to all patients with lung metastases, the results encourage prospective efforts to stratify lung-recurrent mHSPC by genomic features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolette M Fonseca
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Kim Van der Eecken
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Belgium
| | - Cameron Herberts
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Sofie Verbeke
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Sarah W S Ng
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Nicolaas Lumen
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Belgium.,Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Elie Ritch
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Andrew J Murtha
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Cecily Q Bernales
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Elena Schönlau
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Lisa Moris
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jo Van Dorpe
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Matti Annala
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada.,Prostate Cancer Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences and BioMediTech Institute, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| | - Alexander W Wyatt
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada.,Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Belgium.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kolinsky MP, Niederhoffer KY, Kwan EM, Hotte SJ, Hamilou Z, Yip SM, Chi KN, Wyatt AW, Saad F. Considerations on the identification and management of metastatic prostate cancer patients with DNA repair gene alterations in the Canadian context. Can Urol Assoc J 2022; 16:132-143. [PMID: 34812730 PMCID: PMC9054340 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.7621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Olaparib is the first Health Canada-approved agent in metastatic prostate cancer to use a companion diagnostic to identify alterations in BRCA1, BRCA2, or ATM. As olaparib is introduced, clinicians must learn to access and interpret germline and somatic next-generation sequencing (NGS) results, and how to manage affected patients who appear to have distinct clinical features. The traditional model of referring patients to a hereditary cancer clinic (HCC) for germline testing is likely impractical in this disease, as the metastatic prostate cancer patient population would be overwhelming. Alternate approaches to this are clinician-ordered genetic testing (so-called “mainstreaming”), out-of-pocket payment for third-party private company genetic testing, or germline testing done in conjunction with somatic testing, particularly cell free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA).
Germline testing alone is not sufficient for identifying Olaparib-eligible patients, as less than half of BRCA1, BRCA2, or ATM alterations are germline in origin, but it is critically important to identify family members who are carriers so that risk-reduction measures can be undertaken. Somatic testing is not widely available in Canada, but some patients can access it through research protocols or by paying out-of-pocket. Somatic testing can be performed on archival or fresh solid tissue biopsy samples, or through whole blood samples to access plasma-derived circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Both testing approaches have relative advantages and disadvantages, but neither may be informative in all patients and, therefore, ideal somatic NGS pathways should provide options for both tissue and ctDNA testing.
We advocate that clinicians begin discussions with their provincial lab formularies, HCC, and molecular pathology labs to highlight the importance of germline and somatic testing in this population and identify pathways for patient access. While olaparib has approval for use in BRCA1, BRCA2, and ATM-altered mCRPC, emerging evidence suggests that PARP inhibitors have variable activity in these three genes, with BRCA2 alterations appearing to be the most responsive. Retrospective and prospective series have reported varying outcomes to standard of care therapies, such as ARATs and taxane-based chemotherapy, in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients with DNA damage repair (DDR) gene alterations, such as BRCA2. In the absence of high-level evidence showing a lack of benefit, we believe this patient population should still be considered for these treatments.
In addition, platinum-based chemotherapy appears to have activity in DDR gene-altered mCRPC and should be considered another option when access to olaparib is not possible.
At present, there is no evidence to support an optimal treatment sequence in this patient population, therefore, physician and patient preferences will need to be taken into consideration when selecting therapies. As olaparib and other PARP inhibitors are tested in different disease states and in combination with other therapies, we will likely see a more refined approach to use of these agents and management of this new biomarker-defined patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael P. Kolinsky
- Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | | | - Edmond M. Kwan
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Zineb Hamilou
- Division of Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Steven M. Yip
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre and Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Kim N. Chi
- BC Cancer Agency and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Alexander W. Wyatt
- Vancouver Prostate Centre and Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia and Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Fred Saad
- Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Fonseca NM, Roberts ME, Wyatt AW. A marrow-minded look at immune checkpoint blockade resistance in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer. Transl Androl Urol 2021; 10:4009-4013. [PMID: 34804843 PMCID: PMC8575591 DOI: 10.21037/tau-20-1205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolette M Fonseca
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Morgan E Roberts
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Alexander W Wyatt
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Van der Eecken K, Vanwelkenhuyzen J, Deek MP, Tran PT, Warner E, Wyatt AW, Kwan EM, Verbeke S, Van Dorpe J, Fonteyne V, Lumen N, De Laere B, Ost P. Tissue- and Blood-derived Genomic Biomarkers for Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol Oncol 2021; 4:914-923. [PMID: 34801437 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Revised: 08/16/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Multiple studies have reported on the genomic characteristics of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). The impact of these findings on prognostication, treatment selection, and clinical trial design remains unclear. OBJECTIVE To summarise genomic alteration prevalences in liquid and/or tissue biopsies, infer their clinical implications, and compare genomic alteration frequencies across different disease states and clinical phenotypes. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION The PubMed and Web of Knowledge databases were systematically searched up to January 2021. Quality assessment was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS In total, 11 studies encompassing 1682 mHSPC patients were included. High-volume disease was associated with more frequent alterations in TP53, DNA damage repair, and Wnt pathways. Tumours from patients with de novo mHSPC were enriched for alterations in TP53 and CDK12 compared with recurrent disease. Alterations in AR, TP53, cell cycle signalling, and MYC were associated with a poorer clinical outcome. A comparative analysis of gene alteration frequencies across disease states revealed a relative increase from localised to castration-resistant tumours, with noteworthy enrichment of CTNNB1 alterations in mHSPC (5%), which warrants further investigation. This study was limited by variability in methodology and definitions used among the eligible studies, including differences in sequencing methods, analytes (being either tissue or liquid), alteration calling thresholds, and target patient populations with a relative under-representation of recurrent metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS Several genomic alterations are associated with differential prognosis and clinical phenotypes in mHSPC. We urge that emerging data on these potential predictive biomarkers must be validated in biomarker-driven randomised controlled trials before any clinical implementation. Alignment of the assay methodology and reporting will be critical for ensuring rapid scalability. PATIENT SUMMARY We reviewed current data on genomic alterations of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, and summarised key genomic subtypes that associate with specific clinical phenotypes and treatment outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim Van der Eecken
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium; Cancer Research Institute (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium; Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Belgium.
| | - Jan Vanwelkenhuyzen
- Cancer Research Institute (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium; Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Belgium; Center for Medical Genetics, Department of Biomolecular Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Matthew P Deek
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Phuoc T Tran
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Evan Warner
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Alexander W Wyatt
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Edmond M Kwan
- Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sofie Verbeke
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium; Cancer Research Institute (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium
| | - Jo Van Dorpe
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium; Cancer Research Institute (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium
| | - Valérie Fonteyne
- Cancer Research Institute (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium; Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Belgium; Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Nicolaas Lumen
- Cancer Research Institute (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium; Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Belgium; Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Bram De Laere
- Cancer Research Institute (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium; Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Belgium; Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Piet Ost
- Cancer Research Institute (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium; Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Belgium; Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridiumnetwerk, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Smith MR, Thomas S, Gormley M, Chowdhury S, Olmos D, Oudard S, Feng FY, Rajpurohit Y, Urtishak K, Ricci DS, Rooney B, Lopez-Gitlitz A, Yu M, Wyatt AW, Li M, Attard G, Small EJ. Blood Biomarker Landscape in Patients with High-risk Nonmetastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Treated with Apalutamide and Androgen-Deprivation Therapy as They Progress to Metastatic Disease. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 27:4539-4548. [PMID: 34112710 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-0358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Revised: 03/29/2021] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In the placebo-controlled SPARTAN study, apalutamide added to androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) improved metastasis-free survival, second progression-free survival (PFS2), and overall survival (OS) in patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC). Mechanisms of resistance to apalutamide in nmCRPC require evaluation. PATIENTS AND METHODS In a subset of patients from SPARTAN, aberrations were assessed at baseline and end of study treatment (EOST) using targeted next-generation sequencing or qRT-PCR. Circulating-tumor DNA (ctDNA) levels were assessed qualitatively. Select aberrations in androgen receptor (AR) and other common PC-driving genes were detected and summarized by the treatment group; genomic aberrations were summarized in ctDNA-positive samples. Association between detection of aberrations in all patients and outcomes was assessed using Cox proportional-hazards models and multivariate analysis. RESULTS In 247 patients, the overall prevalence of ctDNA, AR aberrations, and TP53 inactivation increased from baseline (40.6%, 13.6%, and 22.2%) to EOST (57.1%, 25.4%, and 35.0%) and was comparable between treatment groups at EOST. In patients who received subsequent androgen signaling inhibition after study treatment, detectable biomarkers at EOST were significantly associated with poor outcomes: ctDNA with PFS2 or OS (HR, 2.01 or 2.17, respectively; P < 0.0001 for both), any AR aberration with PFS2 (1.74; P = 0.024), and TP53 or BRCA2 inactivation with OS (2.06; P = 0.003; or 3.1; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Apalutamide plus ADT did not increase detectable AR/non-AR aberrations over ADT alone. Detectable ctDNA, AR aberrations, and TP53/BRCA2 inactivation at EOST were associated with poor outcomes in patients treated with first subsequent androgen signaling inhibitor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew R Smith
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Shibu Thomas
- Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Simon Chowdhury
- Guy's, King's and St. Thomas' Hospitals, Great Maze Pond, London, United Kingdom
| | - David Olmos
- Spanish National Cancer Research Center (CNIO), and Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria y Regional de Málaga, Madrid, Spain
| | - Stéphane Oudard
- Oncology Department, Georges Pompidou Hospital, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Felix Y Feng
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | | | - Karen Urtishak
- Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Brendan Rooney
- Janssen Research & Development, High Wycombe, United Kingdom
| | | | - Margaret Yu
- Janssen Research & Development, Los Angeles, California
| | - Alexander W Wyatt
- The University of British Columbia, Vancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Mark Li
- Resolution Bioscience, Kirkland, Washington
| | - Gerhardt Attard
- University College London Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | - Eric J Small
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Sperger JM, Emamekhoo H, McKay RR, Stahlfeld CN, Singh A, Chen XE, Kwak L, Gilsdorf CS, Wolfe SK, Wei XX, Silver R, Zhang Z, Morris MJ, Bubley G, Feng FY, Scher HI, Rathkopf D, Dehm SM, Choueiri TK, Halabi S, Armstrong AJ, Wyatt AW, Taplin ME, Zhao SG, Lang JM. Prospective Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes Using a Multiplex Liquid Biopsy Targeting Diverse Resistance Mechanisms in Metastatic Prostate Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:2926-2937. [PMID: 34197212 PMCID: PMC8425833 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.00169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Nearly all men with prostate cancer treated with androgen receptor (AR) signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) develop resistance via diverse mechanisms including constitutive activation of the AR pathway, driven by AR genomic structural alterations, expression of AR splice variants (AR-Vs), or loss of AR dependence and lineage plasticity termed neuroendocrine prostate cancer. Understanding these de novo acquired ARSI resistance mechanisms is critical for optimizing therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie M Sperger
- Department of Medicine, Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | - Hamid Emamekhoo
- Department of Medicine, Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | - Rana R McKay
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | | | - Anupama Singh
- Department of Medicine, Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | - Xinyi E Chen
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Lucia Kwak
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Cole S Gilsdorf
- Department of Medicine, Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | - Serena K Wolfe
- Department of Medicine, Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | - Xiao X Wei
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Rebecca Silver
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Zhenwei Zhang
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Michael J Morris
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Glenn Bubley
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Felix Y Feng
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.,Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Howard I Scher
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Dana Rathkopf
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Scott M Dehm
- Departments of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology and Urology, Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Toni K Choueiri
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Susan Halabi
- Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Duke University, Durham, NC.,Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Andrew J Armstrong
- Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Alexander W Wyatt
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Shuang G Zhao
- Department of Medicine, Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.,Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.,William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, WI
| | - Joshua M Lang
- Department of Medicine, Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.,Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Gonzalez D, Mateo J, Stenzinger A, Rojo F, Shiller M, Wyatt AW, Penault‐Llorca F, Gomella LG, Eeles R, Bjartell A. Practical considerations for optimising homologous recombination repair mutation testing in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. J Pathol Clin Res 2021; 7:311-325. [PMID: 33630412 PMCID: PMC8185363 DOI: 10.1002/cjp2.203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2020] [Revised: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Analysis of the genomic landscape of prostate cancer has identified different molecular subgroups with relevance for novel or existing targeted therapies. The recent approvals of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors olaparib and rucaparib in the metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) setting signal the need to embed molecular diagnostics in the clinical pathway of patients with mCRPC to identify those who can benefit from targeted therapies. Best practice guidelines in overall biospecimen collection and processing for molecular analysis are widely available for several tumour types. However, there is no standard protocol for molecular diagnostic testing in prostate cancer. Here, we provide a series of recommendations on specimen handling, sample pre-analytics, laboratory workflow, and testing pathways to maximise the success rates for clinical genomic analysis in prostate cancer. Early involvement of a multidisciplinary team of pathologists, urologists, oncologists, radiologists, nurses, molecular scientists, and laboratory staff is key to enable optimal workflow for specimen selection and preservation at the time of diagnosis so that samples are available for molecular analysis when required. Given the improved outcome of patients with mCRPC and homologous recombination repair gene alterations who have been treated with PARP inhibitors, there is an urgent need to incorporate high-quality genomic testing in the routine clinical pathway of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Gonzalez
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer ResearchQueen's UniversityBelfastUK
| | - Joaquin Mateo
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO)Vall d'Hebron University HospitalBarcelonaSpain
| | | | - Federico Rojo
- Department of PathologyIIS‐Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz‐CIBERONCMadridSpain
| | - Michelle Shiller
- Department of PathologyBaylor University Medical CenterDallasTXUSA
| | - Alexander W Wyatt
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic SciencesUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
| | - Frédérique Penault‐Llorca
- Centre Jean PerrinUniversité Clermont Auvergne, INSERM, U1240 Imagerie Moléculaire et Stratégies ThéranostiquesClermont FerrandFrance
| | - Leonard G Gomella
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer CenterThomas Jefferson UniversityPhiladelphiaPAUSA
| | - Ros Eeles
- Division of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Anders Bjartell
- Division of Urological Cancers, Department of Translational MedicineLund UniversityLundSweden
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Clark R, Kenk M, McAlpine K, Thain E, Farncombe KM, Pritchard CC, Nussbaum R, Wyatt AW, de Bono J, Vesprini D, Bombard Y, Lorentz J, Narod S, Kim R, Fleshner N. The evolving role of germline genetic testing and management in prostate cancer: Report from the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre International Retreat. Can Urol Assoc J 2021; 15:E623-E629. [PMID: 34171218 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.7383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Prostate cancer is a significant cause of cancer mortality. It has been well-established that certain germline pathogenic variants confer both an increased risk of being diagnosed with prostate cancer and dying of prostate cancer.1 There are exciting developments in both the availability of genetic testing and opportunities for improved treatment of patients. On August 19, 2020, the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre in Toronto, Ontario, hosted a virtual retreat, bringing together international experts in urology, medical oncology, radiation oncology, medical genetics, and translational research, as well as a patient representative. We are pleased to provide this manuscript as a review of those proceedings for Canadian clinicians. RECOMMENDATIONS We drafted several recommendations for future research and policy action based on this meeting:Need for increased access to funding for germline testing for the common genetic disorders associated with increased risk of prostate cancer.A need for increased research into identifying genetic factors influencing risk stratification, treatment response, and outcomes of prostate cancer within Canadian populations at increased genetic risk for prostate cancer.Need for increased awareness about genetic risk factors among the Canadian public.Need for research on patient perspectives and psychosocial outcomes in individuals identified to be at increased genetic risk of prostate cancer.We support the creation of specialized multidisciplinary clinics that specialize in tailored care for patients at increased genetic risk of prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roderick Clark
- Division of Urology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Miran Kenk
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kristen McAlpine
- Division of Urology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Emily Thain
- Familial Cancer Clinic, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kirsten M Farncombe
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Colin C Pritchard
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | | | - Alexander W Wyatt
- Department of Urological Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Johann de Bono
- Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Danny Vesprini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Yvonne Bombard
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michaels Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Justin Lorentz
- Genetics and High Risk Program, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Steven Narod
- Familial Breast Cancer Research Unit, Women's College Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Raymond Kim
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Neil Fleshner
- Division of Urology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Annala M, Taavitsainen S, Khalaf DJ, Vandekerkhove G, Beja K, Sipola J, Warner EW, Herberts C, Wong A, Fu S, Finch DL, Oja CD, Vergidis J, Zulfiqar M, Eigl BJ, Kollmansberger CK, Nykter M, Gleave ME, Chi KN, Wyatt AW. Evolution of Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer in ctDNA during Sequential Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibition. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 27:4610-4623. [PMID: 34083234 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-1625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2021] [Revised: 05/21/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cross-resistance renders multiple lines of androgen receptor (AR) signaling inhibitors increasingly futile in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We sought to determine acquired genomic contributors to cross-resistance. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN We collected 458 serial plasma cell-free DNA samples at baseline and progression timepoints from 202 patients with mCRPC receiving sequential AR signaling inhibitors (abiraterone and enzalutamide) in a randomized phase II clinical trial (NCT02125357). We utilized deep targeted and whole-exome sequencing to compare baseline and posttreatment somatic genomic profiles in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). RESULTS Patient ctDNA abundance was correlated across plasma collections and independently prognostic for sequential therapy response and overall survival. Most driver alterations in established prostate cancer genes were consistently detected in ctDNA over time. However, shifts in somatic populations after treatment were identified in 53% of patients, particularly after strong treatment responses. Treatment-associated changes converged upon the AR gene, with an average 50% increase in AR copy number, changes in AR mutation frequencies, and a 2.5-fold increase in the proportion of patients carrying AR ligand binding domain truncating rearrangements. CONCLUSIONS Our data show that the dominant AR genotype continues to evolve during sequential lines of AR inhibition and drives acquired resistance in patients with mCRPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matti Annala
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada.,Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Centre, Tampere, Finland
| | - Sinja Taavitsainen
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Centre, Tampere, Finland
| | - Daniel J Khalaf
- BC Cancer, Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Gillian Vandekerkhove
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Kevin Beja
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Joonatan Sipola
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Centre, Tampere, Finland
| | - Evan W Warner
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Cameron Herberts
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Amanda Wong
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Simon Fu
- BC Cancer, Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Daygen L Finch
- BC Cancer, Southern Interior Centre, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Conrad D Oja
- BC Cancer, Fraser Valley Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Joanna Vergidis
- BC Cancer, Vancouver Island Centre, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Bernhard J Eigl
- BC Cancer, Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Matti Nykter
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Centre, Tampere, Finland
| | - Martin E Gleave
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Kim N Chi
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada. .,BC Cancer, Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Alexander W Wyatt
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Maurice-Dror C, Fonseca N, Herberts C, Fan W, Wyatt AW, Chi KN. Circulating tumor DNA fraction (ctDNA%) to independently predict for clinical outcomes in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.5049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
5049 Background: CtDNA% (the tumour-derived proportion of cell-free DNA (cfDNA)) is abundant in >60% of mCRPC pts and associates with adverse clinical prognostic factors. However, prognostic associations have not been comprehensively tested across clinical contexts. We evaluated the utility of ctDNA% as an independent prognostic biomarker in patients with mCRPC prior to first-line (1L) therapy. Methods: 410 treatment-naïve mCRPC pts had blood samples drawn prior to 1L therapy and followed prospectively for outcomes. Plasma cfDNA was subjected to deep targeted sequencing and ctDNA% was calculated using validated methods ( Annala, Cancer Discov, 2018 ). Overall survival (OS), PSA progression free survival (PSA PFS) and PSA declines ≥50% from baseline (PSA50 response rate (RR)) were stratified by ctDNA% and compared using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analysis. Results: Median age was 73 yrs. (range 45-98), the majority of pts had ECOG PS 0-1 (78%) and 9.5% had liver metastases at baseline. The most common 1L therapy employed was androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (90%). Median follow-up was 21 mo. (range 1-75) and median ctDNA% was 4.9% (range: 0-89%). Stratifying patients into high ctDNA (>30%) and Low ctDNA (≤2%) groups showed stronger association with OS and PSA PFS than grouping by median (Table). In a univariate comparison to pts with low ctDNA (≤2%), pts with high ctDNA% (>30%) had significantly shorter median PSA PFS, median OS and a lower PSA50 RR (Table). In a multivariable adjustment for clinical prognostic factors and cfDNA concentration, high ctDNA% remained strongly associated with OS (HR= 3.3, 95%CI: 2.1-5.3, p<0.001) and PSA PFS (HR: 3.7, 95%CI: 2.4-5.9, p<0.001). Although ctDNA% and total cfDNA concentration were correlated (R2=0.55), association with OS was stronger for ctDNA% than cfDNA concentration (stratified at median; HR: 2.9 (2.3-3.7), p<0.001 vs HR: 2.1 (1.7-2.6), p<0.001). Conclusions: In a large cohort of treatment-naïve mCRPC pts, ctDNA% prior to 1L treatment provided strong prognostic information independent of known clinical factors. These data further demonstrate the multipronged clinical utility of ctDNA-based profiling for actionable genomic alterations.[Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - William Fan
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Alexander W. Wyatt
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Kim N. Chi
- BC Cancer-Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Annala M, Fu S, Bacon JVW, Sipola J, Iqbal N, Ferrario C, Ong M, Wadhwa D, Hotte SJ, Lo G, Tran B, Wood LA, Gingerich JR, North SA, Pezaro CJ, Ruether JD, Sridhar SS, Kallio HML, Khalaf DJ, Wong A, Beja K, Schönlau E, Taavitsainen S, Nykter M, Vandekerkhove G, Azad AA, Wyatt AW, Chi KN. Cabazitaxel versus abiraterone or enzalutamide in poor prognosis metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase II trial. Ann Oncol 2021; 32:896-905. [PMID: 33836265 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.03.205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2020] [Revised: 03/10/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment of poor prognosis metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) includes taxane chemotherapy and androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI). We sought to determine optimal treatment in this setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS This multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase II trial recruited patients with ARPI-naive mCRPC and poor prognosis features (presence of liver metastases, progression to mCRPC after <12 months of androgen deprivation therapy, or ≥4 of 6 clinical criteria). Patients were randomly assigned 1 : 1 to receive cabazitaxel plus prednisone (group A) or physician's choice of enzalutamide or abiraterone plus prednisone (group B) at standard doses. Patients could cross over at progression. The primary endpoint was clinical benefit rate for first-line treatment (defined as prostate-specific antigen response ≥50%, radiographic response, or stable disease ≥12 weeks). RESULTS Ninety-five patients were accrued (median follow-up 21.9 months). First-line clinical benefit rate was greater in group A versus group B (80% versus 62%, P = 0.039). Overall survival was not different between groups A and B (median 37.0 versus 15.5 months, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.58, P = 0.073) nor was time to progression (median 5.3 versus 2.8 months, HR = 0.87, P = 0.52). The most common first-line treatment-related grade ≥3 adverse events were neutropenia (cabazitaxel 32% versus ARPI 0%), diarrhoea (9% versus 0%), infection (9% versus 0%), and fatigue (7% versus 5%). Baseline circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) fraction above the cohort median and on-treatment ctDNA increase were associated with shorter time to progression (HR = 2.38, P < 0.001; HR = 4.03, P < 0.001). Patients with >30% ctDNA fraction at baseline had markedly shorter overall survival than those with undetectable ctDNA (HR = 38.22, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Cabazitaxel was associated with a higher clinical benefit rate in patients with ARPI-naive poor prognosis mCRPC. ctDNA abundance was prognostic independent of clinical features, and holds promise as a stratification biomarker.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Annala
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Centre, Tampere, Finland
| | - S Fu
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada; Oncology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - J V W Bacon
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - J Sipola
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Centre, Tampere, Finland
| | - N Iqbal
- Medical Oncology, Saskatoon Cancer Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
| | - C Ferrario
- Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - M Ong
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and the University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - D Wadhwa
- BC Cancer - Kelowna Centre, Kelowna, Canada
| | - S J Hotte
- Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Canada
| | - G Lo
- Department of Medical Oncology, R. S. McLaughlin Durham Regional Cancer Centre, Lakeridge Health, Oshawa, Canada
| | - B Tran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - L A Wood
- QEII Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Canada
| | - J R Gingerich
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - S A North
- Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - C J Pezaro
- Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Australia; Department of Oncology, Eastern Health, Australia
| | | | - S S Sridhar
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - H M L Kallio
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Centre, Tampere, Finland
| | - D J Khalaf
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada
| | - A Wong
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - K Beja
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - E Schönlau
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - S Taavitsainen
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Centre, Tampere, Finland
| | - M Nykter
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Centre, Tampere, Finland
| | - G Vandekerkhove
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - A A Azad
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - A W Wyatt
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada.
| | - K N Chi
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Dror CM, Wyatt AW, Chi KN. Olaparib for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer. Future Oncol 2021; 17:2413-2429. [PMID: 33769071 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2020-1245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent innovations in the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer have improved patient outcomes. Nonetheless, this disease remains fatal and additional treatment approaches are needed. Greater understanding of the molecular landscape of metastatic prostate cancer has revealed recurrent alterations in key pathways amenable to therapeutic targeting. One such pathway is DNA repair, particularly alterations in genes directly or indirectly associated with homologous recombination repair found in up to one-quarter of patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Olaparib, an inhibitor of poly-ADP-ribose polymerase, has recently gained approval for the treatment of mCRPC harboring alterations in homologous recombination repair genes. This review will provide a summary of evidence regarding PARP inhibition in the treatment of mCRPC, with a specific focus on olaparib.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alexander W Wyatt
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4S6, Canada.,Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4S6, Canada
| | - Kim N Chi
- BC Cancer, Vancouver, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4S6, Canada.,Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4S6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kwon DH, Chou J, Yip SM, Reimers MA, Zhang L, Wright F, Dhawan MS, Borno HT, Desai A, Aggarwal RR, Wyatt AW, Small EJ, Alva AS, Chi KN, Feng FY, Koshkin VS. Differential treatment outcomes in BRCA1/2-, CDK12-, and ATM-mutated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Cancer 2021; 127:1965-1973. [PMID: 33690902 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2020] [Revised: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 01/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND DNA damage repair mutations (DDRm) are common in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The optimal standard therapy for this population is not well described. METHODS A multi-institutional, retrospective study of patients with mCRPC and DDRm was conducted. Patient data, including systemic therapies and responses, were collected. The decline in prostate-specific antigen ≥ 50% from baseline (PSA50) and overall survival (OS) from the treatment start were compared by mutation and treatment type. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model for OS was created that controlled for DDRm, first-line treatment received for mCRPC, and clinical factors. RESULTS The most common DDRm observed among 149 men with mCRPC were BRCA1/2 (44%), CDK12 (32%), and ATM (15%). The majority received first-line abiraterone (40%) or enzalutamide (30%). The PSA50 rate with first-line abiraterone was lower for CDK12 (52%) than BRCA1/2 (89%; P = .02). After first-line abiraterone or enzalutamide, the median OS was longest with second-line carboplatin-chemotherapy (38 months) in comparison with abiraterone or enzalutamide (33 months), docetaxel (17 months), or cabazitaxel (11 months; P = .02). PSA50 responses to carboplatin-based chemotherapy were higher for BRCA1/2 (79%) than ATM (14%; P = .02) or CDK12 (38%; P = .08). In a multivariable analysis, neither the specific DDRm type nor the first-line treatment was associated with improved OS. CONCLUSIONS Responses to standard therapies were generally superior in patients with BRCA1/2 mutations and inferior in patients with ATM or CDK12 mutations. The DDRm type did not independently predict OS. After progression on first-line abiraterone or enzalutamide, carboplatin-based chemotherapy was associated with the longest OS. These findings may inform treatment discussions and clinical trial design and require prospective validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel H Kwon
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Jonathan Chou
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Steven M Yip
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Melissa A Reimers
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Li Zhang
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.,Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Francis Wright
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Mallika S Dhawan
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Hala T Borno
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Arpita Desai
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Rahul R Aggarwal
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Alexander W Wyatt
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Eric J Small
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Ajjai S Alva
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Kim N Chi
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Felix Y Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Vadim S Koshkin
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Chen E, Cario CL, Leong L, Lopez K, Márquez CP, Chu C, Li PS, Oropeza E, Tenggara I, Cowan J, Simko JP, Chan JM, Friedlander T, Wyatt AW, Aggarwal R, Paris PL, Carroll PR, Feng F, Witte JS. Cell-free DNA concentration and fragment size as a biomarker for prostate cancer. Sci Rep 2021; 11:5040. [PMID: 33658587 PMCID: PMC7930042 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84507-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2020] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed neoplasm in American men. Although existing biomarkers may detect localized prostate cancer, additional strategies are necessary for improving detection and identifying aggressive disease that may require further intervention. One promising, minimally invasive biomarker is cell-free DNA (cfDNA), which consist of short DNA fragments released into circulation by dying or lysed cells that may reflect underlying cancer. Here we investigated whether differences in cfDNA concentration and cfDNA fragment size could improve the sensitivity for detecting more advanced and aggressive prostate cancer. This study included 268 individuals: 34 healthy controls, 112 men with localized prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP), and 122 men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Plasma cfDNA concentration and fragment size were quantified with the Qubit 3.0 and the 2100 Bioanalyzer. The potential relationship between cfDNA concentration or fragment size and localized or mCRPC prostate cancer was evaluated with descriptive statistics, logistic regression, and area under the curve analysis with cross-validation. Plasma cfDNA concentrations were elevated in mCRPC patients in comparison to localized disease (OR5ng/mL = 1.34, P = 0.027) or to being a control (OR5ng/mL = 1.69, P = 0.034). Decreased average fragment size was associated with an increased risk of localized disease compared to controls (OR5bp = 0.77, P = 0.0008). This study suggests that while cfDNA concentration can identify mCRPC patients, it is unable to distinguish between healthy individuals and patients with localized prostate cancer. In addition to PSA, average cfDNA fragment size may be an alternative that can differentiate between healthy individuals and those with localized disease, but the low sensitivity and specificity results in an imperfect diagnostic marker. While quantification of cfDNA may provide a quick, cost-effective approach to help guide treatment decisions in advanced disease, its use is limited in the setting of localized prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmalyn Chen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Clinton L Cario
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Lancelote Leong
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Karen Lopez
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - César P Márquez
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.,School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Carissa Chu
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Patricia S Li
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Erica Oropeza
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Imelda Tenggara
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Janet Cowan
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jeffry P Simko
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Department of Anatomic Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - June M Chan
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Terence Friedlander
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Alexander W Wyatt
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Rahul Aggarwal
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Pamela L Paris
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Peter R Carroll
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Felix Feng
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - John S Witte
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. .,Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Sjöström M, Zhao S, Small EJ, Ning Y, Maurice-Dror C, Foye A, Hua JJT, Li H, Beer TM, Evans CP, Rettig M, Chi KN, Alumkal JJ, Aggarwal RR, Ashworth A, Levy S, He HH, Wyatt AW, Quigley DA, Feng FY. 5-hydroxymethylcytosine as a liquid biopsy biomarker in mCRPC. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.6_suppl.148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
148 Background: 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) is an epigenetic modification which regulates gene expression and is associated with active transcription. The optimization of 5hmC sequencing in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) could therefore enable assessment of gene activity through a liquid biopsy. We aimed to investigate the 5hmC landscape of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and to evaluate the potential of 5hmC modifications in cfDNA as biomarkers of outcome in mCRPC patients. Methods: Genome-wide 5hmC modifications were analyzed with a low-input whole-genome 5hmC sequencing method based on selective chemical labeling in DNA from 93 mCRPC tissue biopsies previously profiled with whole-genome sequencing (WGS), RNA-sequencing and whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS). In addition, we analyzed 64 cell-free DNA (cfDNA) samples, from men with mCRPC before first-line abiraterone or enzalutamide, with both 5hmC sequencing and a conventional targeted ctDNA panel assessing common genomic alterations. Results: In mCRPC tissue samples, 5hmC enrichment was more strongly associated with gene expression than promoter methylation or copy number. Among cancer hallmark pathways, the androgen response genes had the strongest association between 5hmC and gene expression, suggesting a disease specific marking of gene activation. 5hmC patterns in cfDNA could be used to estimate the circulating tumor DNA fraction (ct-fraction), which was prognostic for overall survival (tertiles of ct-fraction, HR = 1.6 95%CI 1.1-2.3, p = 0.007). Further, 5hmC levels were indicative of gain of oncogene activity (such as AR, MYC, and PIK3CA) and loss of tumor suppressor gene activity (such as RB1, TP53 and BRCA2). The number of alterations, by 5hmC levels, of common drivers of mCRPC was prognostic for overall survival, also after adjusting for ct-fraction (adjusted p = 0.00001), and the prognostic value of common alterations detected by 5hmC sequencing versus conventional targeted ctDNA sequencing was similar. Finally, 5hmC levels in cfDNA of genes not significantly altered by copy number gain or loss (and thus not routinely included in targeted ctDNA sequencing assays), such as TOP2A and EZH2, identified a high-risk subgroup of mCRPC, which was highly prognostic for overall survival independent of ct-fraction (adjusted HR = 1.8 95%CI 1.2-2.8, p = 0.007). Conclusions: 5hmC in mCRPC tissue demonstrated an association with gene expression that was highest for prostate cancer driver genes, highlighting the ability to track disease-specific biology. 5hmC in cfDNA from men with mCRPC can be used to estimate the ct-fraction of the sample, infer activity gain and loss of common drivers of mCRPC, and identify high-risk groups of mCRPC based on alterations not commonly detected with conventional ctDNA sequencing, showing its potential as a liquid biomarker. Further studies are aimed at optimizing and validating 5hmC-based biomarkers in larger cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Sjöström
- University of California, San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - Shuang Zhao
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Eric Jay Small
- University of California, San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | - Adam Foye
- University of California, San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - Jun Jie T. Hua
- University of California, San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - Haolong Li
- University of California, San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - Tomasz M. Beer
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| | | | - Matthew Rettig
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, and VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Kim N. Chi
- University of British Columbia, BC Cancer-Vancouver Center, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Rahul Raj Aggarwal
- University of California, San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - Alan Ashworth
- University of California, San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Housheng H. He
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alexander W. Wyatt
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - David A. Quigley
- University of California, San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - Felix Y Feng
- University of California, San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Vandekerkhove G, Lavoie JM, Annala M, Murtha AJ, Sundahl N, Walz S, Sano T, Taavitsainen S, Ritch E, Fazli L, Hurtado-Coll A, Wang G, Nykter M, Black PC, Todenhöfer T, Ost P, Gibb EA, Chi KN, Eigl BJ, Wyatt AW. Plasma ctDNA is a tumor tissue surrogate and enables clinical-genomic stratification of metastatic bladder cancer. Nat Commun 2021; 12:184. [PMID: 33420073 PMCID: PMC7794518 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-20493-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Molecular stratification can improve the management of advanced cancers, but requires relevant tumor samples. Metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) is poised to benefit given a recent expansion of treatment options and its high genomic heterogeneity. We profile minimally-invasive plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) samples from 104 mUC patients, and compare to same-patient tumor tissue obtained during invasive surgery. Patient ctDNA abundance is independently prognostic for overall survival in patients initiating first-line systemic therapy. Importantly, ctDNA analysis reproduces the somatic driver genome as described from tissue-based cohorts. Furthermore, mutation concordance between ctDNA and matched tumor tissue is 83.4%, enabling benchmarking of proposed clinical biomarkers. While 90% of mutations are identified across serial ctDNA samples, concordance for serial tumor tissue is significantly lower. Overall, our exploratory analysis demonstrates that genomic profiling of ctDNA in mUC is reliable and practical, and mitigates against disease undersampling inherent to studying archival primary tumor foci. We urge the incorporation of cell-free DNA profiling into molecularly-guided clinical trials for mUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gillian Vandekerkhove
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Matti Annala
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Centre, Tampere, Finland
| | - Andrew J Murtha
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Nora Sundahl
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Experimental Cancer Research, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Simon Walz
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Takeshi Sano
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Sinja Taavitsainen
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Centre, Tampere, Finland
| | - Elie Ritch
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Ladan Fazli
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Antonio Hurtado-Coll
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Gang Wang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Matti Nykter
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Centre, Tampere, Finland
| | - Peter C Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Tilman Todenhöfer
- Studienpraxis Urologie, Nuertingen, Germany
- Medical School, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Experimental Cancer Research, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Ewan A Gibb
- Decipher Biosciences, Inc., Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Kim N Chi
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Bernhard J Eigl
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| | - Alexander W Wyatt
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Warner E, Herberts C, Fu S, Yip S, Wong A, Wang G, Ritch E, Murtha AJ, Vandekerkhove G, Fonseca NM, Angeles A, Beigi A, Schönlau E, Beja K, Annala M, Khalaf D, Chi KN, Wyatt AW. BRCA2, ATM, and CDK12 Defects Differentially Shape Prostate Tumor Driver Genomics and Clinical Aggression. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 27:1650-1662. [PMID: 33414135 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-3708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2020] [Revised: 11/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE DNA damage repair (DDR) defects are common across cancer types and can indicate therapeutic vulnerability. Optimal exploitation of DDR defects in prostate cancer requires new diagnostic strategies and a better understanding of associated clinical genomic features. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN We performed targeted sequencing of 1,615 plasma cell-free DNA samples from 879 patients with metastatic prostate cancer. Depth-based copy-number calls and heterozygous SNP imbalance were leveraged to expose DDR-mutant allelic configuration and categorize mechanisms of biallelic loss. We used split-read structural variation analysis to characterize tumor suppressor rearrangements. Patient-matched archival primary tissue was analyzed identically. RESULTS BRCA2, ATM, and CDK12 were the most frequently disrupted DDR genes in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), collectively mutated in 15% of evaluable cases. Biallelic gene disruption via second somatic alteration or mutant allele-specific imbalance was identified in 79% of patients. A further 2% exhibited homozygous BRCA2 deletions. Tumor suppressors TP53, RB1, and PTEN were controlled via disruptive chromosomal rearrangements in BRCA2-defective samples, but via oncogene amplification in context of CDK12 defects. TP53 mutations were rare in cases with ATM defects. DDR mutations were re-detected across 94% of serial ctDNA samples and in all available archival primary tissues, indicating they arose prior to metastatic progression. Loss of BRCA2 and CDK12, but not ATM, was associated with poor clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS BRCA2, ATM, and CDK12 defects are each linked to distinct prostate cancer driver genomics and aggression. The consistency of DDR status in longitudinal samples and resolution of allelic status underscores the potential for ctDNA as a diagnostic tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan Warner
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Cameron Herberts
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Simon Fu
- BC Cancer, Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Steven Yip
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Amanda Wong
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Gang Wang
- Department of Pathology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Elie Ritch
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Andrew J Murtha
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Gillian Vandekerkhove
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Nicolette M Fonseca
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Arshia Beigi
- BC Cancer, Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Elena Schönlau
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Kevin Beja
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Matti Annala
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Centre, Finland
| | - Daniel Khalaf
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Kim N Chi
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. .,BC Cancer, Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Alexander W Wyatt
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. .,Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Casanova-Salas I, Athie A, Boutros PC, Del Re M, Miyamoto DT, Pienta KJ, Posadas EM, Sowalsky AG, Stenzl A, Wyatt AW, Mateo J. Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Blood-based Liquid Biopsies to Inform Clinical Decision-making in Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol 2021; 79:762-771. [PMID: 33422353 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.12.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Genomic stratification can impact prostate cancer (PC) care through diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarkers that aid in clinical decision-making. The temporal and spatial genomic heterogeneity of PC together with the challenges of acquiring metastatic tissue biopsies hinder implementation of tissue-based molecular profiling in routine clinical practice. Blood-based liquid biopsies are an attractive, minimally invasive alternative. OBJECTIVE To review the clinical value of blood-based liquid biopsy assays in PC and identify potential applications to accelerate the development of precision medicine. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic review of PubMed/MEDLINE was performed to identify relevant literature on blood-based circulating tumor cells (CTCs), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), and extracellular vesicles (EVs) in PC. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Liquid biopsy has emerged as a practical tool to profile tumor dynamics over time, elucidating features that evolve (genome, epigenome, transcriptome, and proteome) with tumor progression. Liquid biopsy tests encompass analysis of DNA, RNA, and proteins that can be detected in CTCs, ctDNA, or EVs. Blood-based liquid biopsies have demonstrated promise in the context of localized tumors (diagnostic signatures, risk stratification, and disease monitoring) and advanced disease (response/resistance biomarkers and prognostic markers). CONCLUSIONS Liquid biopsies have value as a source of prognostic, predictive, and response biomarkers in PC. Most clinical applications have been developed in the advanced metastatic setting, where CTC and ctDNA yields are significantly higher. However, standardization of assays and analytical/clinical validation is necessary prior to clinical implementation. PATIENT SUMMARY Traces of tumors can be isolated from blood samples from patients with prostate cancer either as whole cells or as DNA fragments. These traces provide information on tumor features. These minimally invasive tests can guide diagnosis and treatment selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Casanova-Salas
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO) and Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alejandro Athie
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO) and Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Paul C Boutros
- Departments of Human Genetics and Urology, Institute for Precision Health and Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Marzia Del Re
- Unit of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - David T Miyamoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kenneth J Pienta
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Edwin M Posadas
- Translational Oncology Program & Urologic Oncology Program, Cedars-Sinai Cancer, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Adam G Sowalsky
- Laboratory of Genitourinary Cancer Pathogenesis, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Arnulf Stenzl
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Alexander W Wyatt
- Vancouver Prostate Centre and Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Joaquin Mateo
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO) and Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Hofmann MR, Hussain M, Dehm SM, Beltran H, Wyatt AW, Halabi S, Sweeney C, Scher HI, Ryan CJ, Feng FY, Attard G, Klein E, Miyahira AK, Soule HR, Sharifi N. Prostate Cancer Foundation Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Biomarker Working Group Meeting Summary. Urology 2020; 155:165-171. [PMID: 33373705 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.12.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 12/15/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Androgen deprivation therapy remains the backbone therapy for the treatment of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). In recent years, several treatments, including docetaxel, abiraterone + prednisone, enzalutamide, and apalutamide, have each been shown to demonstrate survival benefit when used upfront along with androgen deprivation therapy. However, treatment selection for an individual patient remains a challenge. There is no high level clinical evidence for treatment selection among these choices based on biological drivers of clinical disease. In August 2020, the Prostate Cancer Foundation convened a working group to meet and discuss biomarkers for hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, the proceedings of which are summarized here. This meeting covered the state of clinical and biological evidence for systemic therapies in the mHSPC space, with emphasis on charting a course for the generation, interrogation, and clinical implementation of biomarkers for treatment selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin R Hofmann
- Genitourinary Malignancies Research Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Department of Urology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Maha Hussain
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Scott M Dehm
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Himisha Beltran
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Alexander W Wyatt
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Susan Halabi
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke Medical Center and Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC
| | - Christopher Sweeney
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Howard I Scher
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Charles J Ryan
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Felix Y Feng
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Urology, and Medicine University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | | | - Eric Klein
- Genitourinary Malignancies Research Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Department of Urology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | | | | | - Nima Sharifi
- Genitourinary Malignancies Research Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Department of Urology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Kawai Y, Imada K, Akamatsu S, Zhang F, Seiler R, Hayashi T, Leong J, Beraldi E, Saxena N, Kretschmer A, Oo HZ, Contreras-Sanz A, Matsuyama H, Lin D, Fazli L, Collins CC, Wyatt AW, Black PC, Gleave ME. Paternally Expressed Gene 10 (PEG10) Promotes Growth, Invasion, and Survival of Bladder Cancer. Mol Cancer Ther 2020; 19:2210-2220. [PMID: 32847979 DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-19-1031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2019] [Revised: 11/17/2019] [Accepted: 08/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Paternally expressed gene 10 (PEG10) has been associated with neuroendocrine muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), a subtype of the disease with the poorest survival. In this work, we further characterized the expression pattern of PEG10 in The Cancer Genome Atlas database of 412 patients with MIBC, and found that, compared with other subtypes, PEG10 mRNA level was enhanced in neuroendocrine-like MIBC and highly correlated with other neuroendocrine markers. PEG10 protein level also associated with neuroendocrine markers in a tissue microarray of 82 cases. In bladder cancer cell lines, PEG10 expression was induced in drug-resistant compared with parental cells, and knocking down of PEG10 resensitized cells to chemotherapy. Loss of PEG10 increased protein levels of cell-cycle regulators p21 and p27 and delayed G1-S-phase transition, while overexpression of PEG10 enhanced cancer cell proliferation. PEG10 silencing also lowered levels of SLUG and SNAIL, leading to reduced invasion and migration. In an orthotopic bladder cancer model, systemic treatment with PEG10 antisense oligonucleotide delayed progression of T24 xenografts. In summary, elevated expression of PEG10 in MIBC may contribute to the disease progression by promoting survival, proliferation, and metastasis. Targeting PEG10 is a novel potential therapeutic approach for a subset of bladder cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshihisa Kawai
- The Vancouver Prostate Centre and Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan
| | - Kenjiro Imada
- The Vancouver Prostate Centre and Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Shusuke Akamatsu
- Department of Urology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Fan Zhang
- The Vancouver Prostate Centre and Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Roland Seiler
- The Vancouver Prostate Centre and Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Department of Urology, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Tetsutaro Hayashi
- The Vancouver Prostate Centre and Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jeffrey Leong
- The Vancouver Prostate Centre and Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Eliana Beraldi
- The Vancouver Prostate Centre and Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Neetu Saxena
- The Vancouver Prostate Centre and Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Alexander Kretschmer
- The Vancouver Prostate Centre and Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Htoo Zarni Oo
- The Vancouver Prostate Centre and Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Alberto Contreras-Sanz
- The Vancouver Prostate Centre and Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Hideyasu Matsuyama
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan
| | - Dong Lin
- The Vancouver Prostate Centre and Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Ladan Fazli
- The Vancouver Prostate Centre and Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Colin C Collins
- The Vancouver Prostate Centre and Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Alexander W Wyatt
- The Vancouver Prostate Centre and Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Peter C Black
- The Vancouver Prostate Centre and Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Martin E Gleave
- The Vancouver Prostate Centre and Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Vandekerkhove GR, Annala M, Lavoie JM, Sundahl N, Walz S, Sano T, Murtha A, Todenhöfer T, Ost P, Chi KN, Black PC, Eigl B, Wyatt AW. Abstract PR08: The genomic landscape of metastatic urothelial carcinoma from circulating tumor DNA. Clin Cancer Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1557-3265.bladder19-pr08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
The recent expansion of treatment options for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) has emphasized the need for molecular biomarkers in this setting. However, knowledge of the somatic genome landscape in mUC is limited; large-scale sequencing efforts have relied on primary tumor tissue from muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), revealing a molecularly heterogeneous disease characterized in particular by high somatic mutation rates. Putative prognostic and predictive biomarkers described from primary tissue need validation in metastatic tumors. Given the challenge of obtaining metastatic tissue, we sought to utilize circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to characterize the somatic landscape in mUC. We collected 162 whole-blood samples from 90 mUC patients. Targeted next-generation sequencing was performed on cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and matched leukocyte DNA utilizing a custom 50-gene panel. Somatic alteration frequencies in our metastatic cohort were compared to those reported for primary MIBC by TCGA (Cell 2017, n=412), with data obtained via cBioPortal. Our cohort of 90 mUC patients included 14% with upper tract disease. The median cfDNA sequencing depth was 986x, with ctDNA detectable in at least one blood collection for 81% (73/90) of mUC patients. In 10/73 patients, the estimated tumor mutation burden was ≥30 mutations per Mb. TP53 was the most frequently mutated gene (46/73 ctDNA-positive patients). Chromatin modifiers were also frequently altered: ARID1A 27%, and 25% for KDM6A and KMT2D. Genes mutated in the PI3K pathway included PIK3CA (22%), PTEN (5.5%), and PIK3R1 (1.4%). FGFR3 mutations were identified in 8.2% of patients. ERBB2 mutations were present in 12.3% of patients, and amplification was detected in eight patients. Thus, the metastatic somatic landscape closely resembles primary disease; however, comparison to TCGA dataset revealed mutations in TP53 and FGFR1 were enriched for in the metastatic setting (TP53: 63.0% vs. 48.1%, p = 0.022; FGFR1: 5.5% vs. 1.5%, p = 0.049; two-sided Fisher's exact test). Profiling of ctDNA from a large mUC cohort suggests a relatively similar somatic landscape to primary MIBC. However, alterations in key driver genes are potentially over- or underrepresented in metastatic disease, which has prognostic implications. In mUC, ctDNA profiling is a powerful alternative to metastatic tissue biopsy.
This abstract is also being presented as Poster B19.
Citation Format: Gillian R. Vandekerkhove, Matti Annala, Jean-Michel Lavoie, Nora Sundahl, Simon Walz, Takeshi Sano, Andrew Murtha, Tilman Todenhöfer, Piet Ost, Kim N. Chi, Peter C. Black, Bernhard Eigl, Alexander W. Wyatt. The genomic landscape of metastatic urothelial carcinoma from circulating tumor DNA [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Bladder Cancer: Transforming the Field; 2019 May 18-21; Denver, CO. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2020;26(15_Suppl):Abstract nr PR08.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gillian R. Vandekerkhove
- 1Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada,
| | - Matti Annala
- 2Institute of Biosciences and Medical Technology, Tampere, Finland,
| | | | - Nora Sundahl
- 4Department of Radiation Oncology and Experimental Cancer Research, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium,
| | - Simon Walz
- 5Department of Urology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Takeshi Sano
- 1Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada,
| | - Andrew Murtha
- 1Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada,
| | - Tilman Todenhöfer
- 5Department of Urology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Piet Ost
- 4Department of Radiation Oncology and Experimental Cancer Research, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium,
| | - Kim N. Chi
- 3Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada,
| | - Peter C. Black
- 1Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada,
| | - Bernhard Eigl
- 3Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada,
| | - Alexander W. Wyatt
- 1Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada,
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Zhao SG, Chen WS, Li H, Foye A, Zhang M, Sjöström M, Aggarwal R, Playdle D, Liao A, Alumkal JJ, Das R, Chou J, Hua JT, Barnard TJ, Bailey AM, Chow ED, Perry MD, Dang HX, Yang R, Moussavi-Baygi R, Zhang L, Alshalalfa M, Laura Chang S, Houlahan KE, Shiah YJ, Beer TM, Thomas G, Chi KN, Gleave M, Zoubeidi A, Reiter RE, Rettig MB, Witte O, Yvonne Kim M, Fong L, Spratt DE, Morgan TM, Bose R, Huang FW, Li H, Chesner L, Shenoy T, Goodarzi H, Asangani IA, Sandhu S, Lang JM, Mahajan NP, Lara PN, Evans CP, Febbo P, Batzoglou S, Knudsen KE, He HH, Huang J, Zwart W, Costello JF, Luo J, Tomlins SA, Wyatt AW, Dehm SM, Ashworth A, Gilbert LA, Boutros PC, Farh K, Chinnaiyan AM, Maher CA, Small EJ, Quigley DA, Feng FY. The DNA methylation landscape of advanced prostate cancer. Nat Genet 2020; 52:778-789. [PMID: 32661416 PMCID: PMC7454228 DOI: 10.1038/s41588-020-0648-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 171] [Impact Index Per Article: 42.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2020] [Accepted: 05/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Although DNA methylation is a key regulator of gene expression, the comprehensive methylation landscape of metastatic cancer has never been defined. Through whole-genome bisulfite sequencing paired with deep whole-genome and transcriptome sequencing of 100 castration-resistant prostate metastases, we discovered alterations affecting driver genes only detectable with integrated whole-genome approaches. Notably, we observed that 22% of tumors exhibited a novel epigenomic subtype associated with hyper-methylation and somatic mutations in TET2, DNMT3B, IDH1, and BRAF. We also identified intergenic regions where methylation is associated with RNA expression of the oncogenic driver genes AR, MYC and ERG. Finally, we showed that differential methylation during progression preferentially occurs at somatic mutational hotspots and putative regulatory regions. This study is a large integrated study of whole-genome, whole-methylome and whole-transcriptome sequencing in metastatic cancer and provides a comprehensive overview of the important regulatory role of methylation in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuang G Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - William S Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Haolong Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Adam Foye
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Meng Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Martin Sjöström
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Rahul Aggarwal
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Denise Playdle
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Joshi J Alumkal
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.,Department of Molecular and Medical Genetics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Rajdeep Das
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jonathan Chou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Junjie T Hua
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Travis J Barnard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Adina M Bailey
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Eric D Chow
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Center for Advanced Technology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Marc D Perry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ha X Dang
- McDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.,Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Rendong Yang
- The Hormel Institute, University of Minnesota, Austin, MN, USA
| | - Ruhollah Moussavi-Baygi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Li Zhang
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Mohammed Alshalalfa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - S Laura Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Kathleen E Houlahan
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Human Genetics, Institute for Precision Health, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Yu-Jia Shiah
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tomasz M Beer
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.,Division of Hematology/Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - George Thomas
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.,Department of Pathology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Kim N Chi
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Martin Gleave
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Amina Zoubeidi
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Robert E Reiter
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Departments of Medicine and Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Matthew B Rettig
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Departments of Medicine and Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Medicine, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Owen Witte
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics at the David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - M Yvonne Kim
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Lawrence Fong
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Daniel E Spratt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Todd M Morgan
- Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Rohit Bose
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Department of Anatomy, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Franklin W Huang
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Hui Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Lisa Chesner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Tanushree Shenoy
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Hani Goodarzi
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Irfan A Asangani
- Department of Cancer Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Shahneen Sandhu
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Joshua M Lang
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Nupam P Mahajan
- Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.,Department of Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Primo N Lara
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.,Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Christopher P Evans
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.,Department of Urologic Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Karen E Knudsen
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Housheng H He
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jiaoti Huang
- Department of Pathology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Wilbert Zwart
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joseph F Costello
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jianhua Luo
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Scott A Tomlins
- Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Alexander W Wyatt
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Scott M Dehm
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.,Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Alan Ashworth
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Luke A Gilbert
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Paul C Boutros
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Human Genetics, Institute for Precision Health, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Departments of Medicine and Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Arul M Chinnaiyan
- Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Christopher A Maher
- McDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.,Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Eric J Small
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - David A Quigley
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Felix Y Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. .,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. .,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. .,Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Herberts CM, Murtha AJ, Fu S, Wang G, Schönlau E, Gleave A, Yip S, Angeles A, Hotte S, Alshangiti A, Tran B, North S, Taavitsainen S, Beja K, Vandekerkhove G, Ritch E, Saad F, Iqbal N, Gleave ME, Annala M, Chi KN, Wyatt AW. Abstract A24: Identifying the genomic and clinical features of AKT1/PIK3CA mutant metastatic prostate cancer using circulating tumor DNA. Clin Cancer Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1557-3265.liqbiop20-a24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Hotspot activating mutations in AKT1 and PIK3CA represent a rare but potentially unique subset of metastatic prostate cancers (mPCa). The accompanying genomic and clinical features of these patients are currently unknown. Preclinical evidence suggests that unconstrained PI3K signaling via PTEN loss may render androgen receptor (AR)-targeted therapy less effective. Given the availability of agents that target nodes within the PI3K pathway, elucidating the genomic properties of AKT1/PIK3CA mutant patients and their response to AR-targeted therapy will be critical for therapeutic selection.
Methods: We performed deep targeted sequencing on 1,381 cell-free DNA samples from 608 patients with mPCa. Analysis was restricted to patients with hotspot AKT1 or PI3KCA mutations of presumed clonal origin, requiring a variant allele frequency >25% of a sample’s ctDNA fraction. Activating AKT1 and PIK3CA mutations were defined as recurrent hotspot mutations with a cBioPortal annotation, as well as functionally equivalent variants within 5bp of these canonical hotspot positions. Patient records were reviewed for baseline clinical characteristics, as well as time from androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) initiation to castration resistance and overall survival (OS).
Results: 5.9% (36/608) of patients harbored at least 1 clonal hotspot mutation in either AKT1 or PIK3CA, of which p.E17K and p.E545K/Q/A were most common. This population had a significantly higher ctDNA fraction compared to a control cohort of AKT1/PIK3CA wild-type mPCa patients (Mann-Whitney U test, 0.48 vs. 0.21, p < 0.001). There were no differences in PTEN copy number or mutation frequency compared to the control cohort. Although AR mutations and copy number amplifications were observed at similar frequencies, patients harboring AKT1 or PI3KCA mutations had fewer additional copies of AR (median 4.71 vs. 10.33, p=0.011, Mann-Whitney U Test). 30 patients with activating AKT1/PIK3CA mutations had clinical outcomes available. Interestingly, there were no significant differences in time to castration resistance or OS compared to ctDNA-positive patients without activating PI3K defects.
Conclusions: AKT1/PIK3CA mutant mPCa is defined by a genomic landscape featuring high ctDNA-fraction and lower levels of AR amplification. Response to standard-of-care treatment among these patients is typical for ctDNA-positive mPCa. These findings may nominate patients who may benefit from PI3K-targeted therapeutics following resistance on AR-targeted therapy.
Citation Format: Cameron M. Herberts, Andrew J. Murtha, Simon Fu, Gang Wang, Elena Schönlau, Anna Gleave, Steven Yip, Arkhjamil Angeles, Sebastien Hotte, Abdulraheem Alshangiti, Ben Tran, Scott North, Sinja Taavitsainen, Kevin Beja, Gillian Vandekerkhove1, Elie Ritch, Fred Saad, Nayyer Iqbal, Martin E. Gleave, Matti Annala, Kim N. Chi, Alexander W. Wyatt. Identifying the genomic and clinical features of AKT1/PIK3CA mutant metastatic prostate cancer using circulating tumor DNA [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advances in Liquid Biopsies; Jan 13-16, 2020; Miami, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2020;26(11_Suppl):Abstract nr A24.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Simon Fu
- 2BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada,
| | | | | | - Anna Gleave
- 1Vancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada,
| | - Steven Yip
- 3Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada,
| | | | | | | | - Ben Tran
- 5Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia,
| | - Scott North
- 6Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada,
| | | | - Kevin Beja
- 1Vancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada,
| | | | - Elie Ritch
- 1Vancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada,
| | - Fred Saad
- 8Hospital St. Luc du CHUM, Montreal, QC, Canada,
| | | | | | - Matti Annala
- 7Institute of Biosciences and Medical Technology, Tampere, Finland,
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Bacon JVW, Annala M, Soleimani M, Lavoie JM, So AI, Gleave ME, Fazli L, Chi KN, Kollmannsberger CK, Wyatt AW, Nappi L. Abstract A18: Plasma circulating tumor DNA is scarce and confounded by clonal hematopoiesis in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1557-3265.liqbiop20-a18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Despite the recent implementation of novel targeted therapies, the 5-year survival rate for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) remains dismal. Prognostic and predictive biomarkers are urgently required to avoid unnecessary patient morbidity and financial toxicity. Exploratory studies leveraging archival primary tumor tissue are considered suboptimal in this setting due to the considerable heterogeneity of metastatic lesions. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) permits the noninvasive characterization of metastatic cancers using a simple blood draw. In this study, we sought to establish the utility of a ctDNA-based assay as a tool to profile the somatic genome of patients with mRCC. We collected whole blood from 55 progressing mRCC patients. All patients were systemic therapy naïve at the time of sample collection. Plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and matched leukocyte DNA were subjected to targeted sequencing across 981 cancer-associated genes. Matched tumor tissue from 14 patients was also analyzed. The median cfDNA sequencing depth for this cohort was 938x. 33% of patients had evidence for RCC-derived ctDNA above 1% of total cfDNA; this was significantly lower than prostate or bladder cancer patients analyzed using the same approach. Among ctDNA-positive patients, ctDNA fraction averaged only 3.9% and showed no association with clinical variables or cfDNA yield. In these patients, the most commonly mutated genes were VHL, BAP1, and PBRM1, and matched tissue concordance was 77%. Evidence of somatic expansions unrelated to RCC, such as clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP), was detected in 43% of patients. Pathogenic germline mutations in DNA repair genes were detected in 11% of patients. Patients with ctDNA above 1% had shorter overall survival and progression-free survival on first-line therapy. Patients with evidence of CHIP but not ctDNA had an intermediate prognosis compared to ctDNA-positive and ctDNA-negative patients. CfDNA sequencing enables characterization of the somatic RCC genome in only a minority of metastatic RCC patients. Due to low ctDNA abundance and presence of non-RCC derived somatic clones in circulation, cfDNA sequencing may not be a simple pan-patient alternative to tissue biopsy in metastatic RCC.
Citation Format: Jack V. W. Bacon, Matti Annala, Maryam Soleimani, Jean-Michel Lavoie, Alan I. So, Martin E. Gleave, Ladan Fazli, Kim N. Chi, Christian K. Kollmannsberger, Alexander W. Wyatt, Lucia Nappi. Plasma circulating tumor DNA is scarce and confounded by clonal hematopoiesis in metastatic renal cell carcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advances in Liquid Biopsies; Jan 13-16, 2020; Miami, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2020;26(11_Suppl):Abstract nr A18.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Alan I. So
- 1Vancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada,
| | | | - Ladan Fazli
- 1Vancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada,
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Herberts C, Murtha AJ, Fu S, Wang G, Schönlau E, Xue H, Lin D, Gleave A, Yip S, Angeles A, Hotte S, Tran B, North S, Taavitsainen S, Beja K, Vandekerkhove G, Ritch E, Warner E, Saad F, Iqbal N, Nykter M, Gleave ME, Wang Y, Annala M, Chi KN, Wyatt AW. Activating AKT1 and PIK3CA Mutations in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol 2020; 78:834-844. [PMID: 32451180 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.04.058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2020] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Activating mutations in AKT1 and PIK3CA are undercharacterised in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), but are linked to activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) signalling and sensitivity to pathway inhibitors in other cancers. OBJECTIVE To determine the prevalence, genomic context, and clinical associations of AKT1/PIK3CA activating mutations in mCRPC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We analysed targeted cell-free DNA (cfDNA) sequencing data from 599 metastatic prostate cancer patients with circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) content above 2%. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS In patients with AKT1/PIK3CA mutations, cfDNA was subjected to PTEN intron sequencing and matched diagnostic tumour tissue was analysed when possible. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Of the patients, 6.0% (36/599) harboured somatic clonal activating mutation(s) in AKT1 or PIK3CA. Mutant allele-specific imbalance was common. Clonal mutations in mCRPC ctDNA were typically detected in pretreatment primary tissue and were consistent across serial ctDNA collections. AKT1/PIK3CA-mutant mCRPC had fewer androgen receptor (AR) gene copies than AKT1/PIK3CA wild-type mCRPC (median 4.7 vs 10.3, p = 0.003). AKT1 mutations were mutually exclusive with PTEN alterations. Patients with and without AKT1/PIK3CA mutations showed similar clinical outcomes with standard of care treatments. A heavily pretreated mCRPC patient with an AKT1 mutation experienced a 50% decline in prostate-specific antigen with Akt inhibitor (ipatasertib) monotherapy. Ipatasertib also had a marked antitumour effect in a patient-derived xenograft harbouring an AKT1 mutation. Limitations include the inability to assess AKT1/PIK3CA correlatives in ctDNA-negative patients. CONCLUSIONS AKT1/PIK3CA activating mutations are relatively common and delineate a distinct mCRPC molecular subtype with low-level AR copy gain. Clonal prevalence and evidence of mutant allele selection propose PI3K pathway dependency in selected patients. The use of cfDNA screening enables prospective clinical trials to test PI3K pathway inhibitors in this population. PATIENT SUMMARY Of advanced prostate cancer cases, 6% have activating mutations in the genes AKT1 or PIK3CA. These mutations can be identified using a blood test and may help select patients suitable for clinical trials of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cameron Herberts
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Andrew J Murtha
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Simon Fu
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Gang Wang
- Department of Pathology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Elena Schönlau
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Hui Xue
- Department of Experimental Therapeutics, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Dong Lin
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Department of Experimental Therapeutics, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Anna Gleave
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Steven Yip
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | | | | | - Ben Tran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Scott North
- Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | | | - Kevin Beja
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Gillian Vandekerkhove
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Elie Ritch
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Evan Warner
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Fred Saad
- Urology, Hospital St. Luc du CHUM, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Nayyer Iqbal
- Medical Oncology, Saskatoon Cancer Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Matti Nykter
- Institute of Biosciences and Medical Technology, Tampere, Finland
| | - Martin E Gleave
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Yuzhuo Wang
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Department of Experimental Therapeutics, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Matti Annala
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Institute of Biosciences and Medical Technology, Tampere, Finland
| | - Kim N Chi
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| | - Alexander W Wyatt
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Bacon JVW, Annala M, Soleimani M, Lavoie JM, So A, Gleave ME, Fazli L, Wang G, Chi KN, Kollmannsberger CK, Wyatt AW, Nappi L. Plasma Circulating Tumor DNA and Clonal Hematopoiesis in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2020; 18:322-331.e2. [PMID: 32046920 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.12.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2019] [Accepted: 12/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a lack of molecularly-informed biomarkers for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) sequencing is a minimally-invasive alternative to tissue for profiling the genome in other cancers but relevance in metastatic RCC remains unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS Whole blood was collected from 55 patients with metastatic RCC. Plasma cfDNA and leukocyte DNA were subjected to targeted sequencing across 981 cancer genes. Matched tumor tissue from 14 patients was analyzed. RESULTS Thirty-three percent of patients had evidence for RCC-derived circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), significantly lower than patients with metastatic prostate or bladder cancer analyzed using the same approach. Among ctDNA-positive patients, ctDNA fraction averaged only 3.9% and showed no strong association with clinical variables. In these patients, the most commonly mutated genes were VHL, BAP1, and PBRM1, and matched tissue concordance was 77%. Evidence of somatic expansions unrelated to RCC, such as clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential, were detected in 43% of patients. Pathogenic germline mutations in DNA repair genes were detected in 11% of patients. CtDNA-positive patients had shorter overall survival and progression-free survival on first-line therapy. Patients with evidence of clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential had an intermediate prognosis compared with ctDNA-positive and -negative patients. CONCLUSIONS CfDNA sequencing enables straightforward characterization of the somatic RCC genome in a minority of patients with metastatic RCC. Owing to low ctDNA abundance, and the presence of non-RCC derived somatic clones in circulation, cfDNA sequencing may not be a simple pan-patient alternative to tissue biopsy in metastatic RCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack V W Bacon
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Matti Annala
- Prostate Cancer Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences and BioMediTech Institute, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| | - Maryam Soleimani
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Alan So
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Martin E Gleave
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Ladan Fazli
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Gang Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Kim N Chi
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Alexander W Wyatt
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada.
| | - Lucia Nappi
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|