Comparison of rehospitalization rates and associated costs among patients with schizophrenia receiving paliperidone palmitate or oral antipsychotics

PURPOSE

Comparative data on rehospitalization patterns and associated institutional costs after inpatient treatment with paliperidone palmitate or oral antipsychotic therapy are reported.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using discharge and billing records from a large hospital database. Selected clinical and cost outcomes were compared in a cohort of adult patients who received the long-acting antipsychotic paliperidone palmitate during a schizophrenia-related index hospital stay and a cohort of patients who received oral antipsychotic therapy during their index admission. Inverse probability-of-treatment weights based on propensity scores were used to reduce confounding. Rates of all-cause and schizophrenia-related rehospitalization and emergency room (ER) use in the two cohorts over periods of up to 12 months were analyzed using a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model. Institutional costs for the evaluated postdischarge events were compared via multivariate linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

In the first 12 months after index hospital discharge, the risk of all-cause rehospitalization and ER use was significantly lower in the paliperidone palmitate cohort than in the oral antipsychotic cohort (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-0.63; p < 0.0001); institutional costs during the first 6 months after discharge were significantly lower in the paliperidone palmitate cohort than in the comparator group (adjusted mean monthly cost difference -$404; 95% CI, -$781 to -$148; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The use of paliperidone palmitate therapy during patients' index hospital admission for schizophrenia was associated with a reduced risk of hospital readmission or ER use and lower postdischarge institutional costs.

Economic simulation of canagliflozin and sitagliptin treatment outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with inadequate glycemic control

OBJECTIVES

This study examines the association between changes in diabetes-related quality measures (QMs) (HbA1c, systolic and diastolic blood pressure [BP], low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C], and body weight) and healthcare costs in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. It also performs an economic simulation that evaluates the cost implications of the changes in QMs and of the incidence rates (IRs) of adverse events (AEs) associated with canagliflozin (CANA) and sitagliptin (SITA) treatments in a real-world setting.

METHODS

Health-insurance claims and electronic medical records from the Reliant Medical Group database (2007-2011) were used to identify adult patients with T2DM receiving metformin and sulfonylurea who did not achieve adequate glycemic control. The association between the changes in QMs and healthcare costs was evaluated using multivariate regression and non-parametric bootstrap methods. AE-related costs were taken from the literature. The cost impact of CANA and SITA outcomes was evaluated using the aforementioned costs and the changes in QMs and the IRs of AEs observed in a recent phase 3 trial comparing CANA and SITA as third oral agent (DIA3015).

RESULTS

Eight hundred and fifty-six T2DM patients were identified (mean age = 65.8; female 45.4%). The regression analysis found that increases of 1 percentage point in HbA1C and 1% in systolic and diastolic BP, LDL-C, or weight were associated with a per patient per year (PPPY) cost increase of $4476 (p = 0.028) and $566 (p = 0.006), a decrease of $362 (p = 0.070) and $7 (p = 0.817), and an increase of $241 (p = 0.481), respectively. The economic simulation showed that changes in QMs and IRs of AEs equivalent to those reported in DIA3015 would be associated with a reduction in PPPY healthcare costs of $6061 (p = 0.036) for CANA and $2190 (p = 0.098) for SITA.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that integrated approaches that manage to control a combination of quality measures are most successful at reducing downstream healthcare costs.

Adherence patterns for abiraterone acetate and concomitant prednisone use in patients with prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

With the growing use of oral anticancer medications, understanding adherence patterns has become increasingly important. Abiraterone acetate (AA) is a prodrug of abiraterone, a novel androgen biosynthesis inhibitor. AA is approved for use in combination with prednisone for treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate AA and concomitant prednisone utilization and adherence patterns for patients with prostate cancer in the United States.

METHODS

This study used data from 2 administrative health care claims databases--Dataset 1: Truven Health Analytics MarketScan (December 2010 to August 2012) and Dataset 2: Symphony Health Solutions' ProMetis Lx (June 2009 to March 2013). To evaluate the consistency of medication-taking behavior, adherence was measured using medication possession ratio (MPR), which was calculated as the sum of days of supply divided by the days on therapy in patients with at least 2 AA prescriptions. Additional outcomes included the proportion of patients taking prednisone, mean and median daily dose of AA, and concomitant prednisone use. Adherence was also studied by age, health care plan type, or previous recent chemotherapy subgroups.

RESULTS

515 patients (mean age: 72.2) and 3,228 patients (mean age: 72.2) with at least 1 AA claim were selected from Dataset 1 and Dataset 2, respectively. The mean (median) daily AA dose per person per prescription was 998.8 (1,000) mg for Dataset 1 and 994.2 (1,000) mg for Dataset 2, which is within 1% of the recommended daily dose (1,000 mg). Mean (median) MPR was 93% (98%; n = 492) in Study Population 1 and 93% (100%; n = 2,449) in Study Population 2. The mean (median) daily prednisone dose per person per prescription was similar in both datasets with 10.1 (10.0; n = 488) mg and 10.6 (10.0; n = 2,425) mg in Dataset 1 and 2, respectively. Similar adherence patterns were observed for patients in different age groups, for patients with commercial health care plans versus patients with Medicare coverage, and for patients with recent chemotherapy compared with patients without.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from 2 observational studies reported high levels of adherence to AA dosing and administration patterns consistent with prescribing information. These findings provide useful insights into the treatment patterns in patients with prostate cancer treated with AA and can contribute to the current discussion in oncologic research and practice.