1
|
Schrader R, Posner N, Dorling P, Senerchia C, Chen Y, Beaverson K, Seare J, Garnier N, Walker V, Alvir J, Mahn M, Merla V, Zhang Y, Landis C, Buikema AR. Development and electronic health record validation of an algorithm for identifying patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy in US administrative claims. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 2023; 29:1033-1044. [PMID: 37610111 PMCID: PMC10508712 DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2023.29.9.1033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Muscular dystrophies (MDs) comprise a heterogenous group of genetically inherited conditions characterized by progressive muscle weakness and increasing disability. The lack of separate diagnosis codes for Duchenne MD (DMD) and Becker MD, 2 of the most common forms of MD, has limited the conduct of DMD-specific real-world studies. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate administrative claims-based algorithms for identifying patients with DMD and capturing their nonambulatory and ventilation-dependent status. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using the statistically deidentified Optum Market Clarity Database (including patient claims linked with electronic health records [EHRs] data) to develop and validate the following algorithms: DMD diagnosis, nonambulatory status, and ventilation-dependent status. The initial study sample consisted of US patients in the database who had a diagnosis code for Duchenne/Becker MD (DBMD) between October 1, 2018, and September 30, 2020, who were male, aged 40 years or younger on their first DBMD diagnosis, and met continuous enrollment and 1-day minimal clinical activities requirement in a 12-month measurement period between October 1, 2017, and September 30, 2020. The algorithms, developed by a cross-functional team of DMD specialists (including patient advocates), were based on administrative claims data with International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modifications coding, using information of diagnosis codes for DBMD, sex, age, treatment, and disease severity (eg, evidence of ambulation assistance/support and/or evidence of ventilation support or dependence). Patients who met each algorithm and had EHR notes available were then validated against structured fields and unstructured provider notes from their own linked EHR to confirm patients' DMD diagnoses, nonambulatory status, and ventilation-dependent status. Algorithm performance was assessed by positive predictive value with 95% CIs. RESULTS: A total of 1,300 patients were included in the initial study sample. Of these, EHR were available and reviewed for 303 patients. The mean age of the 303 patients was 14.8 years, with 61.7% being non-Hispanic White. A majority had a Charlson comorbidity index score of 0 (59.4%) or 1-2 (27.7%). Positive predictive value (95% CI) was 91.6% (85.8%-95.6%) for the DMD diagnosis algorithm, 88.4% (80.2%-94.1%) for the nonambulatory status algorithm, and 77.8% (62.9%-88.8%) for the ventilation-dependent status algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: This work provides the means to more accurately identify patients with DMD from administrative claims data without a specific diagnosis code. The algorithms validated in this study can be applied to assess treatment effectiveness and other outcomes among patients with DMD treated in clinical practice. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by Pfizer, which contracted with Optum to perform the study and provide medical writing assistance. Ms Schrader reports being an employee of Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy. Mr Posner reports being an employee and stockholder of Pfizer and receiving support from Pfizer for attending conferences not related to this manuscript. Dr Dorling reports being an employee and stockholder of Pfizer at the time the study was conducted and is a current employee of Chiesi USA, Inc. Ms Senerchia reports being an employee of Optum and owning stock in Pfizer and UnitedHealth Group, the parent company of Optum. Dr Chen reports being an employee and stockholder of Pfizer. Ms Beaverson reports being an employee of Pfizer and owning stock in Pfizer and Amicus Therapeutics. Dr Seare reports being an employee of Optum at the time the study was conducted. Dr Garnier and Ms Merla report being employees of Pfizer. Ms Walker reports being an employee of Optum. Dr Alvir reports being an employee and stockholder of Pfizer. Dr Mahn reports being an employee and stockholder of Pfizer. Dr Zhang reports being an employee of Optum. Ms Landis reports being an employee of Optum. Ms Buikema reports being an employee of Optum and holding stock in UnitedHealth Group, the parent company of Optum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nate Posner
- Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy, Washington, DC
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ghaswalla PK, Marshall GS, Bengtson LGS, Buikema AR, Bancroft T, Koep E, Novy P, Hogea CS. Meningococcal Vaccination Rates Among People With a New Diagnosis of HIV Infection in the US. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e228573. [PMID: 35486405 PMCID: PMC9055456 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.8573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE In the United States, individuals with HIV infection have been recommended to receive a 2-dose series of the meningococcal A, C, W, Y (MenACWY) vaccine since 2016 owing to their increased risk of meningococcal disease. OBJECTIVE To examine uptake and time to receipt of the MenACWY vaccine among people with a new diagnosis of HIV. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study used health insurance data from the US Optum Research Database from January 1, 2016, through March 31, 2018, to retrospectively identify 1208 individuals aged 2 years or older with 1 or more inpatient claim or 2 or more outpatient claims evidencing a new diagnosis of HIV infection and with continuous insurance enrollment for 12 or more months before and 6 or more months after diagnosis. Follow-up was 6 to 33 months. Statistical analysis was conducted from March 7, 2019, to January 5, 2022. EXPOSURE Receipt of the MenACWY vaccine. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The coprimary outcomes were uptake and time to receipt of 1 or more doses of the MenACWY vaccine after a new HIV diagnosis. Secondary outcomes included uptake and time to receipt of 2 or more doses of the MenACWY vaccine. Vaccination uptake and receipt were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis; factors associated with receipt of 1 or more doses of the MenACWY vaccine were identified with multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. RESULTS Of 1208 individuals eligible for vaccination (1024 male patients [84.8%]; mean [SD] age, 38.8 [12.5] years; 35 [2.9%] Asian; 273 [22.6%] Black; 204 [16.9%] Hispanic; 442 [36.6%] White), 16.3% were estimated to have received a first dose of the MenACWY vaccine in the 2 years after a new HIV diagnosis. Among individuals who received a first dose, at 1 year or more of enrollment after the first dose, 66.2% were estimated to have received a second dose within 1 year of the first dose. Factors statistically significantly associated with uptake of the MenACWY vaccine included receipt of a pneumococcal vaccine (hazard ratio [HR], 23.03; 95% CI, 13.93-38.09), attendance at a well-care visit (HR, 3.67; 95% CI, 1.11-12.12), West or Midwest geographic region (West: HR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.44-3.47; Midwest: HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.16-2.71), and male sex (HR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.18-6.26), whereas age of 56 years or older was significantly associated with reduced uptake of the MenACWY vaccine (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.18-0.97). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This cohort study suggests that MenACWY vaccine uptake among people with a new diagnosis of HIV was low, highlighting the need to educate patients and clinicians about the recommendations for conditions such as HIV infection that increase the risk of meningococcal disease among high-risk populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parinaz K. Ghaswalla
- Vaccines, US Health Outcomes, GSK, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- now with Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Moderna Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Gary S. Marshall
- Norton Children’s, affiliated with the University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky
| | | | | | - Tim Bancroft
- Optum Life Sciences, HEOR, Eden Prairie, Minnesota
| | - Eleena Koep
- Optum Life Sciences, HEOR, Eden Prairie, Minnesota
- now with United Healthcare, Center for Health Care Research, Minnetonka, Minnesota
| | - Patricia Novy
- Vaccines, US Health Outcomes, GSK, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- now with Dynavax Technologies, Emeryville, California
| | - Cosmina S. Hogea
- Global Value, Evidence and Outcomes, Oncology, GSK, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- now with Bristol Myers Squibb, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ghaswalla PK, Bengtson LG, Marshall GS, Buikema AR, Bancroft T, Schladweiler KM, Koep E, Novy P, Hogea CS. Corrigendum to ‘Meningococcal vaccination in patients with newly diagnosed asplenia in the United States’ [Vaccine 39 (2021) 272–281]. Vaccine 2022; 40:1383. [DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.07.089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
4
|
Marshall GS, Ghaswalla PK, Bengtson LGS, Buikema AR, Bancroft T, Koep E, Novy P, Hogea CS. Low Meningococcal Vaccination Rates Among Patients With Newly Diagnosed Complement Component Deficiencies in the United States. Clin Infect Dis 2021; 75:155-158. [PMID: 34718466 PMCID: PMC9402647 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciab917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Meningococcal vaccination is recommended for patients with complement component deficiencies (CDs) in the United States. In this retrospective database study, only 4.6% and 2.2% of patients received MenACWY and MenB vaccination, respectively, within 3 years of CD diagnosis. Thus, meningococcal vaccination rates among patients with CDs need to be improved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gary S Marshall
- Norton Children’s and University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| | - Parinaz K Ghaswalla
- Correspondence: P. K. Ghaswalla, Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Moderna, Inc., Philadelphia, PA 19147, USA ()
| | | | | | | | - Eleena Koep
- UnitedHealth Group, Minnetonka, Minnesota, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Buikema AR, Buzinec P, Paudel ML, Andrade K, Johnson JC, Edmonds YM, Jhamb SK, Chastek B, Raja H, Cao F, Hulbert EM, Korrer S, Mazumder D, Seare J, Solow BK, Currie UM. Racial and ethnic disparity in clinical outcomes among patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection in a large US electronic health record database. EClinicalMedicine 2021; 39:101075. [PMID: 34493997 PMCID: PMC8413267 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2021] [Revised: 07/23/2021] [Accepted: 07/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Racial and ethnic minority groups have been disproportionately affected by the US coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic; however, nationwide data on COVID-19 outcomes stratified by race/ethnicity and adjusted for clinical characteristics are sparse. This study analyzed the impacts of race/ethnicity on outcomes among US patients with COVID-19. METHODS This was a retrospective observational study of patients with a confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis in the electronic health record from 01 February 2020 through 14 September 2020. Index encounter site, hospitalization, and mortality were assessed by race/ethnicity (Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black [Black], non-Hispanic White [White], non-Hispanic Asian [Asian], or Other/unknown). Associations between racial/ethnic categories and study outcomes adjusted for patient characteristics were evaluated using logistic regression. FINDINGS Among 202,908 patients with confirmed COVID-19, patients from racial/ethnic minority groups were more likely than White patients to be hospitalized on initial presentation (Hispanic: adjusted odds ratio 1·690, 95% CI 1·620-1·763; Black: 1·810, 1·743-1·880; Asian: 1·503, 1·381-1·636) and during follow-up (Hispanic: 1·700, 1·638-1·764; Black: 1·578, 1·526-1·633; Asian: 1·391, 1·288-1·501). Among hospitalized patients, adjusted mortality risk was lower for Black patients (0·881, 0·809-0·959) but higher for Asian patients (1·205, 1·000-1·452). INTERPRETATION Racial/ethnic minority patients with COVID-19 had more severe disease on initial presentation than White patients. Increased mortality risk was attenuated by hospitalization among Black patients but not Asian patients, indicating that outcome disparities may be mediated by distinct factors for different groups. In addition to enacting policies to facilitate equitable access to COVID-19-related care, further analyses of disaggregated population-level COVID-19 data are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ami R. Buikema
- Optum, Eden Prairie, MN, USA
- Corresponding author at: 11000 Optum Circle, MN101-E300, Eden Prairie, MN 55344, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bengtson LGS, Bancroft T, Schilling C, Buikema AR, Stanford RH. Development and validation of a drug adherence index for COPD. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 2021; 27:198-209. [PMID: 33506734 PMCID: PMC10391199 DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.2.198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Inhaled medications are the mainstay of treatment for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Despite their importance, adherence to these medications is low. Low adherence is linked to increased exacerbation rates, mortality rates, health care utilization, and, ultimately, increased costs. A drug adherence index (DAI) is a predictive modeling tool that identifies patients most likely to change adherence status so that they can be targeted for support programs. Optum has previously developed DAI tools for diabetes, hypertension, and high cholesterol. In this study, a COPD-specific DAI was developed. This DAI tool could be used to better target medication adherence support in patients with COPD, aiming to increase adherence. OBJECTIVES: To develop a COPD-specific DAI using (a) enrollment, medical, and pharmacy variables and (b) only enrollment and pharmacy variables for potential application to pharmacy benefit managers and pharmacy plans. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study using health care claims among Medicare Advantage with Part D beneficiaries with COPD in the United States. Potential predictors of adherence were measured during a 1-year baseline period. The adherence outcome was measured during a subsequent 1-year at-risk period. Adherence to long-acting bronchodilators was defined as a proportion of days covered (PDC) ≥80%. Nonadherence was defined as a PDC of <80%. Patients were stratified according to their adherence status at baseline, and logistic regression models were developed separately for each set of patients. Separate models were also developed using enrollment, medical, and pharmacy variables (primary objective) or using enrollment and pharmacy variables only (secondary objective). RESULTS: A total of 61,507 patients met all inclusion and exclusion criteria. For the primary objective, at baseline, 31,142 patients were adherent and 30,365 patients were nonadherent. The final DAI model used to predict future nonadherence included 30 covariates, with 7 predictors from medical claims. The validated model c-statistic was 0.752. The final DAI model used to predict future adherence included 29 covariates; only 4 predictors were from medical claims. The validated model c-statistic was 0.691. Findings were similar for the secondary objective using only enrollment and pharmacy variables. CONCLUSIONS: This DAI was developed and validated specifically to predict future adherence status to long-acting bronchodilator medications among patients with COPD. The DAI models performed better for predicting nonadherence than predicting adherence. Both organizations with medical and pharmacy data and organizations with only pharmacy data could utilize the DAI tool to target patients for adherence programs, as results were similar with and without the use of medical variables. DISCLOSURES: This study was sponsored and funded by GlaxoSmithKline (HO-16-17938). The study sponsor participated in the conception and design of the study, analysis and interpretation of the data, and drafting and critical revision of the report and approved submission of the manuscript. All authors had access to the results of the analyses, reviewed and edited the manuscript, approved the final draft, and were involved in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The data contained in the Optum database contain proprietary elements owned by Optum and, therefore, cannot be broadly disclosed or made publicly available at this time. The disclosure of these data to third parties assumes certain data security and privacy protocols are in place and that the third party has executed a license agreement that includes restrictive agreements governing the use of the data. Bengtson, Buikema, and Bankcroft are employees at Optum, and Schilling is a former employee of Optum; their employment was not contingent on this work. Optum was funded by GlaxoSmithKline to conduct the study. Stanford was an employee of GlaxoSmithKline at the time of this study and holds stock in GlaxoSmithKline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tim Bancroft
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Optum, Eden Prairie, MN
| | | | - Ami R Buikema
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Optum, Eden Prairie, MN
| | - Richard H Stanford
- US Value Evidence and Outcomes, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ghaswalla PK, Bengtson LGS, Marshall GS, Buikema AR, Bancroft T, Schladweiler KM, Koep E, Novy P, Hogea CS. Meningococcal vaccination in patients with newly diagnosed asplenia in the United States. Vaccine 2020; 39:272-281. [PMID: 33309081 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.11.068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Revised: 11/14/2020] [Accepted: 11/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with asplenia are recommended to receive meningococcal ACWY (MenACWY) and B (MenB) vaccines in the United States (US). OBJECTIVES To examine uptake and time to receipt of meningococcal vaccines in newly diagnosed asplenia patients, and identify factors associated with vaccination. METHODS For this retrospective database analysis, patients were identified from 1/1/2010 (MenACWY) or 1/1/2015 (MenB) through 3/31/2018 from an administrative claims database including commercially insured US patients with ≥1 inpatient or ≥2 outpatient claims with evidence of a new asplenia diagnosis (sickle cell disease was excluded); continuous enrollment for ≥12 months before and ≥6 months after the index date; and age ≥2 (MenACWY) or ≥10 (MenB) years. Co-primary outcomes were uptake and time to receipt of ≥1 dose, separately for MenACWY and MenB, by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to identify characteristics associated with vaccination. RESULTS Among 2,273 and 741 patients eligible for the MenACWY and MenB analyses, respectively, 28.1% and 9.7% received MenACWY and MenB in the first 3 years after a new asplenia diagnosis. Patients were more likely to receive meningococcal vaccines if they had received pneumococcal vaccines (MenACWY: hazard ratio [HR] 26.02; 95% confidence interval [CI] 21.01-32.22; MenB: HR 3.89; 95% CI 2.07-7.29) or attended ≥1 well-care visit (MenACWY: HR 6.63; 95% CI 4.84-9.09; MenB: HR 11.17; 95% CI 3.02-41.26). CONCLUSIONS Meningococcal vaccination rates among newly diagnosed asplenia patients were low, highlighting the need to educate providers about the recommendations for high-risk conditions and ensure healthcare access for vulnerable patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Gary S Marshall
- Norton Children's and University of Louisville School of Medicine, 571 S. Floyd St., Suite 321, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.
| | - Ami R Buikema
- Optum, 11000 Optum Circle, Eden Prairie, MN 55344, USA.
| | - Tim Bancroft
- Optum, 11000 Optum Circle, Eden Prairie, MN 55344, USA.
| | | | - Eleena Koep
- UnitedHealth Group, 12700 Whitewater Drive, Minnetonka, MN 55343, USA.
| | - Patricia Novy
- Vaccines, GSK, 5, Crescent Drive, Philadelphia, PA 19112, USA.
| | - Cosmina S Hogea
- Vaccines, GSK, 5, Crescent Drive, Philadelphia, PA 19112, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Singer D, Bengtson LGS, Elliott C, Buikema AR, Franchino-Elder J. Healthcare Resource Utilization, Exacerbations, and Readmissions Among Medicare Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease After Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonist Therapy Initiation with Soft Mist versus Dry Powder Inhalers. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2020; 15:3239-3250. [PMID: 33324047 PMCID: PMC7732756 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s284678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2020] [Accepted: 11/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is often managed with inhaled long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs), yet real-world data on healthcare resource utilization (HRU) by inhaler type are lacking. This study compared HRU after LAMA initiation with a soft mist inhaler (SMI) versus a dry powder inhaler (DPI). Patients and Methods Inclusion criteria were COPD diagnosis, age ≥40 years, LAMA initiation (index date = first LAMA SMI or DPI claim 9/1/14—6/30/18), and Medicare Advantage enrollment 1 year pre-index (baseline) to ≥30 days post-index (follow-up). Patients were followed to the earliest of discontinuation, switch, disenrollment, 1 year, or study end (7/31/18). Exclusion criteria were asthma, cystic fibrosis, or lung cancer diagnoses, unavailable demographics, multiple index LAMAs, or baseline LAMA use. Cohorts (SMI or DPI) were balanced on baseline characteristics using inverse probability of treatment weighting. Outcomes included per patient per month (PPPM) COPD-related HRU encounters, and exacerbations (defined as moderate [ambulatory visit with corticosteroid or antibiotic within ±7 days] or severe [emergency visit or inpatient admission]); and 30-day readmissions following COPD-related hospitalizations. Results After weighting, cohorts (SMI [n=5360] and DPI [n=22,880]) were similar in age (72 and 73 years, respectively), gender (both 52% female), and COPD severity score (31.3 and 31.5, respectively). Cohorts had similar counts of follow-up HRU encounters. However, the SMI cohort had fewer (mean ± standard deviation) COPD-related exacerbations (0.054±0.082 vs DPI cohort 0.059±0.088 PPPM, p<0.001) overall. Moreover, the SMI cohort had fewer severe exacerbations (0.030±0.058 vs DPI: 0.034±0.065 PPPM, p<0.001). Hospitalizations among SMI patients had a lower adjusted odds of readmission versus hospitalizations among DPI patients (odds ratio: 0.656, 95% confidence interval= 0.460, 0.937; p=0.020). Conclusion SMI initiators had significantly fewer COPD-related exacerbations than DPI initiators. In addition, lower odds of readmissions were observed following COPD-related hospitalizations among the SMI cohort, as compared with the DPI cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Singer
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., Ridgefield, CT, USA
| | | | - Caitlin Elliott
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Optum, Eden Prairie, MN, USA
| | - Ami R Buikema
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Optum, Eden Prairie, MN, USA
| | - Jessica Franchino-Elder
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., Ridgefield, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Palli SR, Frazer M, DuCharme M, Buikema AR, Anderson AJ, Franchino-Elder J. Differences in Real-World Health and Economic Outcomes Among Patients with COPD Treated with Combination Tiotropium/Olodaterol Versus Triple Therapy. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 2020; 26:1363-1374. [PMID: 32678719 PMCID: PMC10390943 DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.20159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The 2018 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) recommends combination long-acting muscarinic antagonists/long-acting beta2-agonists (LAMA + LABA) as preferred maintenance therapy for patients with symptomatic chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD) after monotherapy and stepping up to triple therapy (TT; LAMA + LABA + inhaled corticosteroids [ICS]) in case of further exacerbations. Restrictions on TT recommendations have primarily been driven by higher pneumonia risk associated with regular ICS use. Evidence suggests that TT is overprescribed, which may affect economic and clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVE To compare health plan-paid costs, COPD exacerbations, and pneumonia diagnoses among patients newly treated with a LAMA + LABA regimen composed of tiotropium (TIO) + olodaterol (OLO) in a fixed-dose combination inhaler (TIO + OLO) or TT in a U.S. Medicare Advantage Part D insured population. METHODS This retrospective study identified COPD patients aged ≥ 40 years who were initiating TIO + OLO or TT (index regimen) between January 1, 2014, and March 31, 2018, from a national administrative claims database. Continuous insurance coverage for 12 months pretreatment (baseline) and ≥ 30 days posttreatment (follow-up) was required. Patients were followed until the earliest of study end (May 31, 2018), discontinuation of index regimen (≥ 60-day gap in index regimen coverage), switch to a different regimen, or health plan disenrollment. Before analysis of outcomes, TIO + OLO and TT patients were 1:1 propensity score-matched on baseline demographics, comorbidities, COPD medication use, medical resource use, and costs. Cohort differences in post-match outcomes were assessed by Wald Z-test (annualized costs) and Kaplan-Meier method (time to first COPD exacerbation and pneumonia diagnosis). RESULTS After matching, each cohort had 1,454 patients who were well balanced on baseline characteristics. Compared with TT, the TIO + OLO cohort incurred $7,041 (41.1%) lower mean COPD-related total costs ($10,094 vs. $17,135; P < 0.001); cohort differences in the medical component ($3,666 lower for TIO + OLO) were driven by lower mean acute inpatient costs ($3,053 lower for TIO + OLO). Combined mean COPD plus pneumonia-related medical costs were $5,212 (39.0%) lower for TIO + OLO versus TT ($8,209 vs. $13,421; P = 0.006), and total mean all-cause costs were $9,221 (30.4%) lower for TIO + OLO versus TT ($21,062 vs. $30,283; P < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis found longer time to first severe COPD exacerbation (P = 0.020) and first pneumonia diagnosis (P = 0.002) for TIO + OLO versus TT and a lower percentage of TIO + OLO patients experiencing these events (severe COPD exacerbation: 9.0% vs. 16.1%; pneumonia: 14.5% vs. 19.3%). A secondary analysis, which expanded the TIO + OLO cohort to include any LAMA + LABA regimen, had similar findings for all outcomes. CONCLUSIONS COPD patients initiating TIO + OLO incurred lower costs to health plans and experienced fewer COPD exacerbation and pneumonia events relative to TT. These findings provide important real-world economic and clinical insight into the GOLD recommendations for TIO + OLO and LAMA + LABA therapy. The study findings also indicate the continued inconsistency between the recommendations and real-world clinical practices pertaining to TT. DISCLOSURES This study was sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (BIPI). Palli and Franchino-Elder are employees of BIPI. Frazer, DuCharme, Buikema, and Anderson are employees of Optum, which was contracted by BIPI to conduct this study. The authors received no direct compensation related to the development of the manuscript. BIPI was given the opportunity to review the manuscript for medical and scientific accuracy as well as intellectual property considerations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Swetha R Palli
- Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ridgefield, Connecticut
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tran JN, Wong RJ, Lee JS, Bancroft T, Buikema AR, Ting J, Terrault N. Hepatitis C Screening Rates and Care Cascade in a Large US Insured Population, 2010-2016: Gaps to Elimination. Popul Health Manag 2020; 24:198-206. [PMID: 32392454 DOI: 10.1089/pop.2019.0237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Understanding the health care system's ability to move patients through the hepatitis C virus (HCV) care cascade from screening to treatment is essential for HCV elimination. This retrospective study describes real-world HCV screening rates and care cascade steps to identify gaps in care for patients with HCV in the United States. Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years as of the measurement year (calendar year between January 1, 2010-December 31, 2016) and were commercial and Medicare Advantage with Part D members in the Optum Research database with continuous health plan enrollment 5 years prior to and during the measurement year. Incident and prevalent screening rates were calculated for each measurement year. Care cascade steps were analyzed via Kaplan-Meier analysis and logistic regression among patients with a positive HCV ribonucleic acid test. Cohorts were selected based on birth year (pre-1945 birth cohort, 1945-1965 birth cohort, post-1965 birth cohort). Among the 1945-1965 birth cohort, incident and prevalent screening rates increased from 1.6% to 4.7% and 10% to 18%, respectively, from 2010 to 2016. The proportion of patients attaining each independent cascade step within 1 year of screening increased significantly over time for genotype testing (P = 0.0283) and receipt of treatment (P < 0.0001). Median time from screening to treatment decreased from 1627 days (95% CI 1335-1871) in 2010 to 282 days (95% CI 223-498) in 2015. HCV screening and completion of the care cascade has improved for certain patient populations; however, gaps remain, highlighting the urgent need to address barriers to meeting HCV elimination goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josephine Nhu Tran
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Optum, Eden Prairie, Minnesota, USA
| | - Robert J Wong
- Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Alameda Health System-Highland Hospital, Oakland, California, USA
| | - Janet S Lee
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, California, USA
| | - Tim Bancroft
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Optum, Eden Prairie, Minnesota, USA
| | - Ami R Buikema
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Optum, Eden Prairie, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jie Ting
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, California, USA
| | - Norah Terrault
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Paudel M, Mahmud S, Buikema AR, Korrer S, Damon VV, Brekke L, Chit A. 2747. Relative Vaccine Efficacy of High-Dose vs. Standard Dose Influenza Vaccines in Preventing Probable Influenza in a US Medicare Fee-for-Service Population. Open Forum Infect Dis 2019. [PMCID: PMC6809702 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofz360.2424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
High dose (HD) influenza vaccine has been shown to be more efficacious than standard dose (SD) vaccine in multiple randomized trials. HD is currently the most commonly used vaccine in US seniors (≥65 years of age). In this study, we evaluated the real-world relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of HD vs SD over 3 influenza seasons.
Methods
This study includes a cohort of Medicare fee-for-service enrollees during influenza seasons 2011–2012 to 2013–2014 who received either HD or SD at a pharmacy or an outpatient clinic. HD recipients were matched 1:1 to SD recipients based on location, date of vaccination, age, and gender. Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard models with competing risk of death were used to adjust for residual confounding. The study outcome of probable influenza was defined as any inpatient stay with an influenza diagnosis on the claim, or an outpatient medical encounter with a rapid influenza test/culture followed by an antiviral prescription. Analyses were stratified based on vaccination location (clinic vs pharmacy) as it is expected that physicians carrying both vaccines may prioritize HD to frailer patients, while pharmacists may not exercise clinical judgment.
Results
Over the influenza seasons 2011–2012, 2012/–2013, and 2013–2014, 1.6–2.2 million seniors were immunized at a pharmacy; and 3.3–3.5 million at a clinic. After matching, there were 535,598; 1,017,552; and 1,548,164 in the pharmacy cohort, and 821,662; 1,151,080; and 1,559,488 in the clinic cohort, across study years. The rVE over 2011/12, 2012/13, and 2013/14 during peak influenza circulation was 21.8% (95% CI: −5.9%, 42.3%), 14.8% (9.3%,19.9%), and 16.9% (9.2%, 23.9%), respectively, in the pharmacy cohort; and 16.5% (−5.9%, 34.2%), 15.1% (10.9%, 19.1%), 10.0% (2.9%, 16.6%), respectively, in the clinic cohort.
Conclusion
HD was consistently associated with better protection against probable influenza events requiring outpatient or inpatient care. The slightly lower treatment effects observed in the outpatient clinic cohort could be a result of confounding by indication due to physicians triaging HD to frailer patients.
Disclosures
All authors: No reported disclosures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Ayman Chit
- Sanofi Pasteur, Swiftwater, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bengtson L, Marshall GS, Buikema AR, Koep E, Novy P, Hogea C. 2726. Meningococcal Vaccination Among Patients Newly Diagnosed at High-Risk for Meningococcal Disease in the United States. Open Forum Infect Dis 2019. [PMCID: PMC6810767 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofz360.2403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Quadrivalent conjugate and polysaccharide meningococcal vaccines (MenACWY) have been recommended in the United States for patients at high-risk due to functional or anatomic asplenia, complement component deficiency (CD) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Serogroup B vaccines (MenB) are recommended for patients ≥10 years of age with asplenia or CD. Little is currently known about meningococcal vaccine uptake and time to vaccination among patients with incident high-risk diagnoses.
Methods
Patients newly diagnosed (1 inpatient or ≥2 outpatient medical claims with evidence of the condition ≥30 days apart) with functional or anatomic asplenia (excluding sickle cell disease), CD or HIV infection were identified in the Optum Research Database. Continuous enrollment for ≥12 months before and ≥6 months after the diagnosis date (index date) was required. Patients with evidence of pre-existing conditions were excluded. MenACWY uptake was assessed among patients ≥2 years of age at index date from January 1, 2010 for asplenia and CD, and January 1, 2016 for HIV infection, through March 31, 2018; and MenB uptake among patients ≥10 years of age at index date from January 1, 2015 through March 31, 2018. Current Procedural Terminology and National Drug Codes on medical claims were used to capture vaccinations. For each condition, Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to estimate uptake and time to receipt of ≥1 dose of each vaccine for up to 5 years post-index date; vaccinations within 90 days before the index date were also included in calculations.
Results
Among asplenia patients, the percentage with receipt of ≥1 dose of MenACWY at 1, 2.5, and 5 years post-index date was 6.6%, 9.4%, and 13.3%, respectively; for CD patients the corresponding percentages were 2.2%, 4.8%, and 8.3%; and for HIV patients at 1 and 2.5 years post-index date the percentages were 10.8% and 19.8% (Figure 1). Receipt of ≥1 dose of MenB at 1 and 2.5 years post-index date was 1.7% and 3.1%, respectively, for asplenia patients and 1.1% and 2.5%, respectively, for CD patients (Figure 2).
Conclusion
Uptake of meningococcal vaccines in patients newly diagnosed with high-risk conditions is very low and the time to vaccination is long, leaving patients vulnerable to invasive meningococcal disease for extended periods of time.
Disclosures
All authors: No reported disclosures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Cosmina Hogea
- GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Palli SR, Buikema AR, DuCharme M, Frazer M, Kaila S, Juday T. Costs, exacerbations and pneumonia after initiating combination tiotropium olodaterol versus triple therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Comp Eff Res 2019; 8:1299-1316. [PMID: 31559852 DOI: 10.2217/cer-2019-0101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: To compare health plan-paid costs, exacerbations and pneumonia outcomes for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) initiating combination tiotropium olodaterol (TIO + OLO) versus triple therapy (TT: long-acting muscarinic antagonist + long-acting β2 agonists + inhaled corticosteroid). Patients & methods: COPD patients initiating TIO + OLO or TT between 1 January 2014 and 30 June 2016 were identified from a managed care Medicare database and balanced for baseline characteristics using inverse probability of treatment weighting before assessment of outcomes. Results: Annual COPD-related and all-cause costs were US$4118 (35%) and US$5384 (23%) lower for TIO + OLO versus TT (both p ≤ 0.001). TIO + OLO patients had nearly half the severe exacerbations (8.3 vs 15.5%; p = 0.014) and pneumonia was also less common (18.9 vs 30.9%; p < 0.001). Conclusion: TIO + OLO was associated with improved economic and COPD health outcomes versus TT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Swetha R Palli
- Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ridgefield, CT 06877, USA
| | | | | | | | - Shuchita Kaila
- Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ridgefield, CT 06877, USA
| | - Timothy Juday
- Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ridgefield, CT 06877, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Stanford RH, Parker ED, Reinsch TK, Buikema AR, Blauer-Peterson C. Assessment of COPD-related outcomes in patients initiating a once daily or twice daily ICS/LABA. Respir Med 2019; 150:1-7. [PMID: 30961933 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2019.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2018] [Revised: 12/10/2018] [Accepted: 01/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Use of inhaled corticosteroids and long acting beta agonist (ICS/LABA) combination therapy has been shown to decrease the frequency of exacerbations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In this population, adherence to treatment is associated with better disease control and lower risk of COPD-related exacerbations in the future. Using a treatment with a more convenient regimen or easier-to-use device could improve patient adherence, improve disease control, decrease the frequency of exacerbations and minimize the COPD-related economic burden. Real-world information on the impact on healthcare costs and exacerbation risk of initiating once-daily or twice daily ICS/LABA in this patient population is limited. The objective of this study was to assess COPD-related healthcare costs, adherence, and exacerbations in COPD patients initiating treatment with fluticasone furoate/vilanterol 100/25 (FF/VI) or budesonide/formoterol 160/4.5 (BUD/F) using a large managed care database in the US. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study among COPD patients initiating FF/VI or BUD/F between January 01, 2014 and June 30, 2016. The analysis used the Optum Research Database (ORD) which contains patients from commercial and Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug (MAPD) plans. The study included new initiators of ICS/LABA as either FF/VI or BUD/F for COPD, ≥40 years of age at index, ≥15 months of continuous enrollment (12 months pre-index and ≥3 months post-index). New users of FF/VI or BUD/F were matched on baseline characteristics using propensity score matching (PSM) methods. Multivariate models including ordinary least squares regression, Lin's regression, logistic regression, and Cox proportional hazards were used to assess differences between the cohorts on outcomes of interest. RESULTS A total of 18,652 subjects met all inclusion and exclusion criteria with 5044 initiating FF/VI and 13,608 initiating BUD/F. Of these, 9026 subjects were matched at a 1:1 ratio (4513 patients in each cohort) and were included in the final analyses. Proportion of days covered (PDC), was significantly better for FF/VI (mean PDC [SD]: FF/VI: 0.46 [0.31], BUD/F: 0.41 [0.29], p < 0.001) while FF/VI was associated with a 9% lower risk (adj. hazard ratio (HR): 0.91, 95% CI: 0.85-0.96) of having a moderate or severe COPD-related exacerbation. However, COPD-related healthcare costs were not significantly different, $11,521 vs $10,986, p = 0.41 for FF/VI and BUD/F, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Patients initiating once-daily FF/VI were more adherent, and were associated with a lower risk of subsequent COPD-related exacerbations compared with twice-daily BUD/F, however this was not associated with a significant difference in costs. (GSK Study HO1617333/206702).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard H Stanford
- US Value Evidence and Outcomes, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
| | - Emily D Parker
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Optum, Inc, Eden Prairie, MN, USA
| | - Tyler K Reinsch
- US Value Evidence and Outcomes, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA; Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Ami R Buikema
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Optum, Inc, Eden Prairie, MN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Buikema AR, Brekke L, Anderson A, Koep E, Van Voorhis D, Sharpsten L, Hahn B, Ray R, Stanford RH. The effect of delaying initiation with umeclidinium/vilanterol in patients with COPD: an observational administrative claims database analysis using marginal structural models. Multidiscip Respir Med 2018; 13:38. [PMID: 30338068 PMCID: PMC6180385 DOI: 10.1186/s40248-018-0151-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2018] [Accepted: 08/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with high clinical and economic burden. Optimal pharmacological therapy for COPD aims to reduce symptoms and the frequency and severity of exacerbations. Umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI) is an approved combination therapy for once-daily maintenance treatment of patients with COPD. This study evaluated the impact of delaying UMEC/VI initiation on medical costs and exacerbation risk. METHODS A retrospective analysis of patients with COPD who initiated UMEC/VI between 4/28/2014 and 7/31/2016 was conducted using the Optum Research Database. The index date was the first COPD visit after UMEC/VI available on US formulary (Commercial 4/28/2014; Medicare Advantage 1/1/2015). Patients were followed for 12 months post-index, and categorized into 12 cohorts corresponding to month (30-day period) of UMEC/VI initiation (i.e. Months 1-12) post-index. The outcomes studied during the follow up period included COPD-related and all-cause medical costs, and risk of COPD exacerbations. Marginal structural models (MSM) were used to control for time-varying confounding due to changes in treatment and severity during follow up. RESULTS 2,200 patients initiating UMEC/VI were included in the study sample. Patients' average age was 69.3 years, 49.9% were female and 69.7% were Medicare insured. Following MSM analysis, 12-month adjusted COPD-related medical costs increased by 2.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.1-5.9%; p = 0.044) for each monthly delay in UMEC/VI initiation, with a 37.4% higher adjusted cost for patients initiating UMEC/VI in Month 12 versus Month 1 ($13,087 vs. $9524). The 12-month adjusted all-cause medical costs increased by 2.8% (95% CI: 0.6-5.2%; p = 0.013) for each monthly delay, with a 36.1% higher adjusted cost for patients initiating UMEC/VI at Month 12 versus Month 1 ($22,766 vs. $16,727). The monthly risk of severe exacerbation was significantly higher in patients who had not yet initiated UMEC/VI than those who had (hazard ratio: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.35-2.23; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Prompt use of UMEC/VI following a physician visit for COPD appears to result in economic and clinical benefits, with reductions in medical costs and exacerbation risk. Additional research is warranted to assess the benefits of initiating UMEC/VI as a first-line therapy compared with escalation to UMEC/VI from monotherapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ami R. Buikema
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Optum, 11000 Optum Circle, Eden Prairie, MN 55344 USA
| | - Lee Brekke
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Optum, 11000 Optum Circle, Eden Prairie, MN 55344 USA
| | - Amy Anderson
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Optum, 11000 Optum Circle, Eden Prairie, MN 55344 USA
| | - Eleena Koep
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Optum, 11000 Optum Circle, Eden Prairie, MN 55344 USA
| | - Damon Van Voorhis
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Optum, 11000 Optum Circle, Eden Prairie, MN 55344 USA
| | - Lucie Sharpsten
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Optum, 11000 Optum Circle, Eden Prairie, MN 55344 USA
| | - Beth Hahn
- US Value Evidence and Outcomes, GSK, 5 Moore Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-3398 USA
| | - Riju Ray
- US Medical Affairs, GSK, 5 Moore Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-3398 USA
| | - Richard H. Stanford
- US Value Evidence and Outcomes, GSK, 5 Moore Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-3398 USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hahn B, Buikema AR, Brekke L, Anderson A, Koep E, Van Voorhis D, Sharpsten L, Ray R, Stanford RH. The effect of delaying initiation with umeclidinium/vilanterol in patients with COPD: an observational administrative claims database analysis using marginal structural models. Multidiscip Respir Med 2018. [DOI: 10.4081/mrm.2018.194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with high clinical and economic burden. Optimal pharmacological therapy for COPD aims to reduce symptoms and the frequency and severity of exacerbations. Umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI) is an approved combination therapy for once-daily maintenance treatment of patients with COPD. This study evaluated the impact of delaying UMEC/VI initiation on medical costs and exacerbation risk. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients with COPD who initiated UMEC/VI between 4/28/2014 and 7/31/2016 was conducted using the Optum Research Database. The index date was the first COPD visit after UMEC/VI available on US formulary (Commercial 4/28/2014; Medicare Advantage 1/1/2015). Patients were followed for 12 months post-index, and categorized into 12 cohorts corresponding to month (30-day period) of UMEC/VI initiation (i.e. Months 1–12) post-index. The outcomes studied during the follow up period included COPD-related and all-cause medical costs, and risk of COPD exacerbations. Marginal structural models (MSM) were used to control for time-varying confounding due to changes in treatment and severity during follow up. Results: 2,200 patients initiating UMEC/VI were included in the study sample. Patients’ average age was 69.3 years, 49.9% were female and 69.7% were Medicare insured. Following MSM analysis, 12-month adjusted COPD-related medical costs increased by 2.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.1–5.9%; p = 0.044) for each monthly delay in UMEC/VI initiation, with a 37.4% higher adjusted cost for patients initiating UMEC/VI in Month 12 versus Month 1 ($13,087 vs. $9524). The 12-month adjusted all-cause medical costs increased by 2.8% (95% CI: 0.6–5.2%; p = 0.013) for each monthly delay, with a 36.1% higher adjusted cost for patients initiating UMEC/VI at Month 12 versus Month 1 ($22,766 vs. $16,727). The monthly risk of severe exacerbation was significantly higher in patients who had not yet initiated UMEC/VI than those who had (hazard ratio: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.35–2.23; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Prompt use of UMEC/VI following a physician visit for COPD appears to result in economic and clinical benefits, with reductions in medical costs and exacerbation risk. Additional research is warranted to assess the benefits of initiating UMEC/VI as a first-line therapy compared with escalation to UMEC/VI from monotherapies.
Collapse
|
17
|
Bengtson LGS, Yu Y, Wang W, Cao F, Hulbert EM, Wolbeck R, Elliott CA, Buikema AR. Inhaled Corticosteroid-Containing Treatment Escalation and Outcomes for Patients with Asthma in a U.S. Health Care Organization. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 2018; 23:1149-1159. [PMID: 29083972 PMCID: PMC10397825 DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.11.1149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Asthma is a common disorder that affects approximately 8% of the U.S. POPULATION Treatment guidelines indicate inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) as the mainstay treatment, yet poor asthma control is common among ICS-treated patients. Treatment escalation (ICS dose increase and other controller therapy add-ons) is used to manage symptoms. Real-world studies of postescalation outcomes may inform treatment decisions. OBJECTIVES To (a) describe characteristics and treatment patterns among asthma patients who escalated treatment and (b) assess outcomes (exacerbations, uncontrolled asthma, and health care resource utilization [HCRU]) after escalation. METHODS The study cohort was identified from a large U.S. administrative claims database via ICD-9-CM codes for asthma (493.xx on ≥ 2 dates) and initiation (defining index date) of long-term (> 1 fill) ICS-containing treatment between January 1, 2009, and September 30, 2014. One year of continuous enrollment was required before and after the index date. Escalation was defined as ≥ 1 of the following: ICS dose increase; a switch between ICS, long-acting beta-2 agonists (LABA), or leukotriene modifiers (LTRM) to a different ICS, LABA, or LTRM; or add-on of controller medications (e.g., antibody biologic). Escalation patterns were examined. Rates of exacerbation (defined by inpatient admission, emergency department [ED] visit, or office visit with a pharmacy claim for an oral corticosteroid [OCS] within 7 days) and occurrence of uncontrolled asthma (defined by > 4 fills for a short-acting beta agonist [SABA] in a 1-year period, ≥ 1 OCS fill, or ≥ 1 asthma-related ED visit or inpatient admission) were calculated. Per-patient-per-year (PPPY) HCRU was estimated. RESULTS Among 35,126 patients (mean [SD] age 38 [16] years) who initiated long-term ICS-containing treatment, 5,044 (14%) patients escalated their index regimens at 136 (105) days post-index (i.e., pre-escalation period). The most frequent changes, alone or in combination, included ICS dose increase (68%) or LABA (27%) or LTRM (25%) add-ons. Before escalation, the exacerbation rate was 1.60 (5.10) PPPY, and 1,108 (22%) patients experienced exacerbation. During the postescalation period of 251.6 (138.9) days, the exacerbation rate was 0.75 (2.9) PPPY, and 1,038 (21%) patients experienced exacerbation. A majority (> 85%) of exacerbations in the periods before and after escalation were associated with an office visit plus an OCS pharmacy claim within 7 days. Uncontrolled asthma was experienced by 41.5% and 41.0% of patients before and after escalation, respectively. Ambulatory care visits were common before (mean [SD] 24.0 [26.7] all-cause and 8.5 [13.4] asthma-related PPPY) and after escalation (19.3 [21.3] all-cause and 4.6 [8.1] asthma-related PPPY). CONCLUSIONS Among asthma patients who initiated a long-term ICS-containing regimen, approximately 14% escalated therapy within a year of initiation. Yet, 21% of those patients had ≥ 1 exacerbation, and 41% of patients had uncontrolled asthma within 1 year after treatment escalation. The results demonstrate an unmet need among asthma patients who escalated their ICS-containing treatment. DISCLOSURES This study was sponsored and funded by Boehringer-Ingelheim, which contracted with Optum to conduct the research. The sponsor collaborated with Optum on the preparation, writing, revision, and approval of the manuscript. Bengston, Cao, Hulbert, Wolbeck, Elliott, and Buikema are employees of Optum. Yu and Wang are employed by Boehringer-Ingelheim. Study concept and design were contributed by Bengston, Yu, and Wang. Cao, Hulbert, and Wolbeck collected the data, and data analysis was performed by Bengston, Yu, and Wang. The manuscript was written by Bengston, along with Yu and Wang, and revised by Bengston, Yu, and Wang, along with the other authors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yanni Yu
- 2 Boehringer-Ingelheim, Ridgefield, Connecticut
| | - Weijia Wang
- 2 Boehringer-Ingelheim, Ridgefield, Connecticut
| | - Feng Cao
- 1 Optum, Eden Prairie, Minnesota
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hahn B, Hull M, Blauer-Peterson C, Buikema AR, Ray R, Stanford RH. Rates of escalation to triple COPD therapy among incident users of LAMA and LAMA/LABA. Respir Med 2018; 139:65-71. [PMID: 29858004 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2018.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2017] [Revised: 02/19/2018] [Accepted: 04/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Improved outcomes have been reported for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) receiving combination long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting β2-agonist (LAMA/LABA) therapy compared with LAMA monotherapy. However, little is known about the relative characteristics of these patients and their rates of escalation to triple therapy (TT, combining a LAMA, LABA, and inhaled corticosteroid). This study aimed to characterize patients initiating treatment with the LAMA tiotropium (TIO) and the fixed-dose LAMA/LABA combination therapy umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI), and to compare rates of escalation to TT between patients receiving these therapies. METHODS Retrospective study of patients with COPD enrolled in a US health insurance plan during 2013-2015 and newly initiated on TIO or UMEC/VI. Patients were ≥40 years of age at index (date of therapy initiation) with continuous enrollment for 12 months pre-index and ≥30 days post-index. LAMA users were propensity score matched 1:1 to LAMA/LABA users, with TT initiation rates reported by cohort using pharmacy claims. RESULTS 35,357 patients initiating on TIO and 2407 patients initiating on UMEC/VI were identified. After propensity score matching, the rate of TT initiation was significantly higher in new TIO users (n = 1320) than in new UMEC/VI users (n = 1320) (0.92 vs 0.49 per 100 months of exposure, respectively; p < 0.001). Relative to the UMEC/VI cohort, the TIO cohort had an 87% higher risk of TT initiation (hazard ratio: 1.87; 95% confidence interval: 1.4-2.5; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Patients receiving UMEC/VI progressed to TT more slowly, and were at lower risk of progressing to TT, than patients receiving TIO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beth Hahn
- US Value Evidence and Outcomes, GSK, 5 Moore Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-3398, USA.
| | - Michael Hull
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Optum LifeSciences, 11000 Optum Circle, MN101-E300, Eden Prairie, MN 55344, USA.
| | - Cori Blauer-Peterson
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Optum LifeSciences, 11000 Optum Circle, MN101-E300, Eden Prairie, MN 55344, USA.
| | - Ami R Buikema
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Optum LifeSciences, 11000 Optum Circle, MN101-E300, Eden Prairie, MN 55344, USA.
| | - Riju Ray
- US Medical Affairs, GSK, 5 Moore Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-3398, USA.
| | - Richard H Stanford
- US Value Evidence and Outcomes, GSK, 5 Moore Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-3398, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Campos MA, Runken MC, Davis AM, Johnson MP, Stone GA, Buikema AR. Impact of a Health Management Program on Healthcare Outcomes among Patients on Augmentation Therapy for Alpha 1-Antitrypsin Deficiency: An Insurance Claims Analysis. Adv Ther 2018; 35:467-481. [PMID: 29616482 PMCID: PMC5910458 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-018-0690-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2018] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) is a genetic disorder which reduces serum alpha 1-antitrypsin (AAT or alpha1-proteinase inhibitor, A1PI) and increases the risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Management strategies include intravenous A1PI augmentation, and, in some cases, a health management program (Prolastin Direct®; PD). Objectives This study compared clinical and economic outcomes between patients with and without PD program participation. Methods This retrospective study included commercial and Medicare Advantage health insurance plan members with ≥ 1 claim with diagnosis codes for COPD and ≥ 1 medical or pharmacy claim including A1PI (on index date). Outcomes were compared between patients receiving only Prolastin® or Prolastin®-C (PD cohort) and patients who received a different brand without PD (Comparator cohort). Demographic and clinical characteristics were captured during 6 months pre-index. Post-index exacerbation episodes and healthcare utilization and costs were compared between cohorts. Results The study sample comprised 445 patients (n = 213 in PD cohort; n = 232 in Comparator cohort), with a mean age 55.5 years, 50.8% male, and 78.9% commercially insured. The average follow-up was 822 days (2.25 years), and the average time on A1PI was 747 days (2.04 years). Few differences were observed in demographic or clinical characteristics. Adjusting for differences in patient characteristics, the rate of severe exacerbation episodes was reduced by 36.1% in the PD cohort. Adjusted total annual all-cause costs were 11.4% lower, and adjusted mean respiratory-related costs were 10.6% lower in the PD cohort than the Comparator cohort. Annual savings in all-cause total costs in the PD cohort relative to the Comparator cohort was US$25,529 per patient, largely due to significantly fewer and shorter hospitalizations. Conclusions These results suggest that comprehensive health management services may improve both clinical and economic outcomes among patients with COPD and AATD who receive augmentation therapy. Funding Grifols Shared Services of North America, Inc. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-018-0690-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A Campos
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, University of Miami Health System, 1600 NW 10th Ave # 7043A, Miami, FL, 33136, USA
| | - Michael C Runken
- Global HEOR, Grifols Shared Services of North America, Inc., 79 T.W. Alexander Dr., 4101 Research Commons, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA
| | - Angela M Davis
- Pulmonary Global Scientific and Medical Affairs, Grifols Shared Services of North America, Inc., 79 T.W. Alexander Drive, Bldg 4101, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA
| | - Michael P Johnson
- Optum Life Sciences, HEOR, 11000 Optum Circle, Eden Prairie, MN, 55344, USA
| | - Glenda A Stone
- Global HEOR, Medical Affairs, Grifols Shared Services of North America, Inc., 79 T.W. Alexander Dr., 4101 Research Commons, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA
| | - Ami R Buikema
- Optum Life Sciences, HEOR, 11000 Optum Circle, Eden Prairie, MN, 55344, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Rosenblatt L, Buikema AR, Seare J, Bengtson LGS, Johnson J, Cao F, Villasis-Keever A. Economic Outcomes of First-Line Regimen Switching Among Stable Patients with HIV. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 2017. [PMID: 28650246 PMCID: PMC10397957 DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.16403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although switching of antiretroviral therapy (ART) is a valid approach for addressing treatment failure in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), ART changes among those who are well maintained on their current regimens may lead to the development of new side effects or resistance. OBJECTIVE To examine the effect of first-line regimen switching on subsequent health care utilization and cost among stable HIV patients. METHODS This was a retrospective claims data study of adult patients with HIV who initiated ART between 2007 and 2013 and had been treated with their initial regimens for at least 6 continuous months. Those with evidence of pregnancy or HIV-2 were excluded. Patients who underwent an ART change were assigned to a switcher cohort; a nonswitcher cohort was then generated by matching up to 20 nonswitchers for each switcher, with replacement. The index date was the date of the first ART change for switchers and was the claim date closest to the corresponding switcher's switch date for nonswitchers. Patient characteristics at baseline and post-index annualized health care utilization and costs were analyzed descriptively and with multivariable models. Analyses were performed in the full population and among patients designated as virologically stable (had undetectable viral ribonucleic acid [RNA] for 90 days pre-index) and virologically and clinically stable (had undetectable viral RNA and no apparent clinical reason for switching ART). RESULTS The study population consisted of 6,983 individuals, which included 927 switchers (168 virologically stable; 55 virologically+clinically stable), who were matched with replacement with 18,511 nonswitcher comparators. The switcher cohort was 88.8% male (mean age 43.8 years). Mean preindex and follow-up treatment durations for switchers and nonswitchers were 1.8 years and 1.5 years, respectively; demographic characteristics, pre-index treatment duration, and follow-up duration were similar between cohorts. Significantly more nonswitchers than switchers had a first-line efavirenz-based regimen (67.2% vs. 47.8%, P < 0.001). In the virologically stable subset, follow-up annualized health care utilization for switchers versus nonswitchers, respectively, was 14.8 versus 12.3 ambulatory visits (P < 0.05), 0.8 versus 0.9 emergency department visits (P = 0.652), and 0.05 versus 0.05 inpatient hospitalizations (P = 0.915). Follow-up annualized health care costs were $37,120 for switchers versus $31,771 for nonswitchers (P < 0.05), with the difference driven largely by pharmacy costs. Multivariable-adjusted follow-up annualized health care costs were 8.9% higher among switchers versus nonswitchers (P < 0.01), and switchers also had a shorter time to subsequent ART regimen change (P < 0.001). Results were similar for the virologically+clinically stable subset. CONCLUSIONS In this large, real-world population, stable patients with HIV who switched from their first-line ART regimens had significantly higher health care costs than those who did not change therapies, suggesting that ART regimen changes may be costly and should be undertaken only when clinically warranted. DISCLOSURES This work was funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), which participated in the design of the study, interpretation of the data, revision of the manuscript, and the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Rosenblatt is an employee and stock owner of BMS; Villasis-Keever was an employee of BMS at the time this study was conducted and is currently an employee of Janssen. Buikema is an employee and stock owner of Optum, and Seare, Bengston, Johnson, and Cao are employees of Optum, which was contracted by BMS to conduct the study. Optum contracts with pharmaceutical companies, such as Janssen, Merck, EMD Serano, GlaxoSmithKline, and Gilead, to conduct research in HIV. Optum is also a subsidiary of a health plan that has interest in managing the health and associated costs of patients with HIV. Study concept and design were contributed by Rosenblatt and Buikema, along with the other authors. Cao and Johnson took the lead in data collection, along with Buikema, Seare, and Bengston. Data interpretation was performed by Buikema, Seare, Bengston, and Villasis-Keever. The manuscript was written by Buikema and Bengston, along with Rosenblatt, Seare, Johnson and Villasis-Keever, and revised by Rosenblatt, Villasis-Keever, and Johnson, along with the other authors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Feng Cao
- 2 Optum, Eden Prairie, Minnesota
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Masseria C, Buikema AR, Liu F, Krishnarajah G. Mixing of diphtheria, tetanus, and acellular pertussis (DTaP) vaccines in a population of children in managed care. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2015; 11:1175-83. [PMID: 25714800 PMCID: PMC4514255 DOI: 10.4161/21645515.2014.985506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2014] [Revised: 10/10/2014] [Accepted: 10/22/2014] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommends administering diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis (DTaP) vaccines to children at 2, 4, 6, 15-18 months, and 4-6 y of age; preferably with the same-brand vaccine for the whole series. We estimated age-appropriate DTaP dose completion and the proportion of children receiving a "mixed" DTaP vaccination series (ie, including DTaP vaccines from ≥ 2 brands) across the 3 milestones. Commercially-insured children born between 01/01/2003 and 04/30/2011 were identified from United States health insurance claims data and assigned to ≥ 1 of 3 study cohorts based on the duration of continuous health plan enrollment: 1) birth to <8 months; 2) birth to <20 months; 3) birth to <7 years. Dose completion and brand mixing of the first 3, first 4 or all 5 doses were measured in the respective cohorts. Administered DTaP vaccinations were identified in claims data and classified by brand (based on vaccine components and manufacturer). The analysis included children who received ≥ 2 DTaP vaccinations and had known brand information for all doses. Age-appropriate dose completion was 77% with 3 doses (<8 months cohort), 71% with 4 doses (<20 months cohort), and 85% with 5 doses (<7 years cohort). Mixed DTaP series were received by 4.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.6%-4.7%) in the <8 months cohort, 29.0% (95% CI: 28.6%-29.4%) in the <20 months cohort, and 39.0% (95% CI: 34.5, 43.6) in the <7 years cohort. DTaP mixing was just 4.7% for the first 3 doses but subsequently increased with the number of administered doses.
Collapse
|
22
|
Krishnarajah G, Davis EJ, Fan Y, Standaert BA, Buikema AR. Rotavirus vaccine series completion and adherence to vaccination schedules among infants in managed care in the United States. Vaccine 2011; 30:3717-22. [PMID: 22214886 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.12.077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2011] [Revised: 12/01/2011] [Accepted: 12/17/2011] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Two rotavirus vaccines are currently approved in the United States: 3-dose RotaTeq (RV5; Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA) is administered at ages 2, 4, and 6 months; and 2-dose Rotarix (RV1; GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA) is administered at ages 2 and 4 months. Our objective was to compare rotavirus vaccine series completion and dosing schedule compliance between cohorts of infants who received these vaccines. METHODS Infants aged less than 1 year who initiated a rotavirus vaccine series between 01 January 2009 and 30 June 2009 were identified in US health insurance claims data. Cohorts were formed based on vaccine brand use. Series completion and compliance with the FDA-approved and ACIP-recommended harmonized schedules were analyzed descriptively and a log binomial model was used to estimate the difference in series completion by vaccine brand while adjusting for demographic variables. RESULTS Among infants in the RV1 and RV5 cohorts (N=55,584), 84.3% completed a full series. A greater proportion of the RV1 cohort than the RV5 cohort completed their series (91.0% vs. 83.4%; P<0.001; multivariate-adjusted relative risk 1.07; 95% CI 1.06-1.08). In the RV1 and RV5 cohorts, respectively, 75.0% and 59.5% of infants were fully compliant with the FDA-approved administration schedule for their vaccine (P<0.001); 83.3% and 76.4% of infants were fully compliant with the harmonized schedule (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS The proportion of infants that completed the series was greater and compliance with respective FDA-approved and harmonized dosing schedules was higher among infants vaccinated with RV1 than among infants who received RV5.
Collapse
|
23
|
Leider HL, Dhaliwal J, Davis EJ, Kulakodlu M, Buikema AR. Healthcare costs and nonadherence among chronic opioid users. Am J Manag Care 2011; 17:32-40. [PMID: 21348566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the health economic burden of chronic opioid users and to determine whether opioid regimen nonadherence contributes to increased healthcare costs. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective claims-based analysis of patients with long-term prescription opioid use (>120 days of supply over 6 months). METHODS Twelve-month healthcare utilization and costs were compared for chronic opioid users (n = 49,425) and, among chronic opioid users with urine drug-monitoring results (n = 2100), between adherent patients versus patients with evidence of nonadherence to their opioid regimen. Likely nonadherence was based on urine test results indicating absence of the prescribed drug, higher or lower than expected drug levels based on a proprietary algorithm, or presence of unprescribed or illegal drugs. The influence of nonadherence on total healthcare costs was assessed using multivariate models. RESULTS Prevalence of chronic opioid use was 1.3%. Chronic opioid users had significantly greater healthcare utilization and costs than matched nonusers ($23,049 vs $4975; P <.001). Adherent patients (n = 442) had lower total healthcare costs than likely nonadherent patients (n = 1658; $23,160 vs $26,433; P = .036). After adjustment for demographics, likely nonadherence was significantly associated with elevated total healthcare costs (cost ratio [CR] 1.136; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00, 1.29; P = .048). When adjusting for other types of nonadherence, the presence of higher than expected levels of the prescribed opioid was associated with significantly elevated costs (CR 1.121; 95% CI 1.01, 1.25; P = .039). CONCLUSION Chronic opioid users represent a substantial cost burden relative to similar patients without evidence of chronic pain. Among likely nonadherent chronic opioid users, those with evidence of opioid overuse had significantly elevated healthcare costs.
Collapse
|